Re: meta-kde package and Testing

2002-02-26 Thread tluxt2
--- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
  Is there any chance that the meta-kde package can make it into testing 
  before release?
  
  Sorry, this has probably been asked many many times... (where's the 
  answer, debian-devel ?)
 
 You'll have to check with the KDE maintainer, Chris Cheney. Somebody
 really needs to take it over and sort out its bugs - see #135796.

Since Chris is probably very busy working of the tasks shown below, 
1) Let me make you aware of his recent comments (below)
2) ajt:  If ccheney is roughly able to achieve his estimated schedule (below),
will that be sufficient to meet the deadline for inclusion in Woody's release?
3) ajt:  Is there a posted release time table?  I looked at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/  and
http://www.debian.org/devel/
and didn't find a timetable there.  Would it be a good idea to post a timetable
for the release at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/ ?


--- On 24 Feb 2002 12:08:45 -0600 Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As everyone else on this list knows dates like are meaningless since
 it is impossible to predict what will come up and I do have lots of
 outside pressures that will take away some time.  However, if you want
 a pretty date list here it is.
 
 2/24 - finish kdebase
 2/25 - finish kdeadmin
 2/26 - finish kdegraphics
 2/27 - finish kdemultimedia
 2/28 - finish kdenetwork
 3/ 1 - finish kdepim
 3/ 2 - finish kdeutils
 3/ 3 - finish kde-meta
 3/ 4 - finish kde-i18n
 3/ 5 - finish kdebindings
 3/ 6 - finish kdoc
 
 kdebase appears to be the biggest obstacle currently, and the others
 are probably easier to fix.  I have been working on kdebase for about
 5 days so far and I think it is almost finished.


Debian Bug report logs - #135796
meta-kde: this package badly needs a maintainer, and badly needs to get into
woody 
Package: meta-kde; Reported by: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
dated Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:33:02 UTC; 
Maintainer for meta-kde is Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Source for meta-kde is (unknown). 
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Bug#135796; Package meta-kde. Full text available. 
Acknowledgement sent to Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian QA Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full text available.


Message received at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2002 02:22:56 +
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: meta-kde: this package badly needs a maintainer, and badly needs to
get into woody
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:25:25 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: meta-kde
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-25
Severity: normal

Tasksel depends on the kde metapackages for its desktop task to work as
advertised. Somehow that metapackage has not yet made it into woody. It
is release critical that it does.

The packages in this metapackage have a large number of unsatisfyable
depends, according to the excuses page, expecially on non-i386, but on
i386 as well.

I'm not marking this bug as RC since this package needs to get into
woody and that won't help. Tasksel will be receiving the RC bug. IF this
is not quickly corrected, tasksel might be forced to drop support for
KDE.

Debian bug tracking system administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Last
modified: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 05:44:37 UTC 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com




Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:28:08PM +, Kyle Gordon wrote:
 On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 22:42, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
  not much heard about KDE3.deb lately. Are there any KDE3
  alpha/experimental debs around? Until last time when I worked upstream on
  karm Ivan's alpha stuff did fine for me, but that's no longer the case it
  seems.

I have experimental .deb's which do not work. Everything segfaults on
load, I'm going to check this out, but it could be due to a botched
local qt3 install.

  I'd really could use *any* quality of KDE-head debs, I only need to be
  able to aproximately compile and start some stuff to check features etc.
  It doesn't have to be anything near perfect or stable.

Give me 24 hours or so.

 I'm new to the list, so forgive me if I ask silly questions :-p
 
 On a related note to Tomas' post, I noticed KDE3 (well, the splash
 screen at least :-) went into the unstable release a few weeks ago, but
 as of yet there has been no further updates. Is this normal practice, or
 does KDE take a little bit longer to settle in with Debian??

KDE3 is not in unstable, and won't be for some time.

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
doogie I just go and break dpkg.  that's my lot in life.


pgpgQ8xqA1QCO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: packages tasksel expects to find in woody, that arn't there

2002-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:15:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
 Of particular note is the missing KDE metapackage, which means
 that new woody installs do not get KDE at all, although tasksel claims
 to let you pick it as part of the desktop task. Someone needs to begin
 maintaining that package, fix its dependancy problems, and get it into
 woody posthaste.

KDE is maintained, and works fine. kdelibs is sitting in incoming and
AIUI needs an override to go in (even though it's not NEW). Most of its
dependency problems are there; a kdebase package has also been prepared
for upload to fix the other dependancy problem.

Hopefully, with these uploads, meta-kde should hit woody.

-d, crossing his fingers and knocking on wood(y?)

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
stibbons I'm sorry I'm a trendy breakdancer with orange sunglasses.


pgpOZi5JzUsG8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: meta-kde package and Testing

2002-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:24:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
   Is there any chance that the meta-kde package can make it into testing 
   before release?
   
   Sorry, this has probably been asked many many times... (where's the 
   answer, debian-devel ?)
  
  You'll have to check with the KDE maintainer, Chris Cheney. Somebody
  really needs to take it over and sort out its bugs - see #135796.
 
 Since Chris is probably very busy working of the tasks shown below, 
 1) Let me make you aware of his recent comments (below)
 2) ajt:  If ccheney is roughly able to achieve his estimated schedule (below),
 will that be sufficient to meet the deadline for inclusion in Woody's release?
 3) ajt:  Is there a posted release time table?  I looked at
 http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/  and
 http://www.debian.org/devel/
 and didn't find a timetable there.  Would it be a good idea to post a 
 timetable
 for the release at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/ ?

It's ready when it's ready when it's ready. You will find this
philosophy all through Debian. It's not just debian-kde that's been
telling you this.

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** tbm has joined channel #debian-bugs
weasel The Master is alive!
weasel Has he found precious?
weasel Has he found The Ring?
tbm I search...
tbm I eat tbm.
tbm Right now I am working on his liver.
tbm It is tasty.


pgpog2oT5MtBS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:

 On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:28:08PM +, Kyle Gordon wrote:
  On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 22:42, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
   not much heard about KDE3.deb lately. Are there any KDE3
   alpha/experimental debs around? Until last time when I worked upstream on
   karm Ivan's alpha stuff did fine for me, but that's no longer the case it
   seems.

 I have experimental .deb's which do not work. Everything segfaults on
 load, I'm going to check this out, but it could be due to a botched
 local qt3 install.

   I'd really could use *any* quality of KDE-head debs, I only need to be
   able to aproximately compile and start some stuff to check features etc.
   It doesn't have to be anything near perfect or stable.

 Give me 24 hours or so.

Absolutely no problem. But please (that's a plea only, no pressure in my
voice) give feedback to the list as soon as there's *anything* available.

Thanks a lot Daniel,
*t


 Tomas Pospisek
 SourcePole   -  Linux  Open Source Solutions
 http://sourcepole.ch
 Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
 Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11





Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:47:56PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
  On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 22:42, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
   I'd really could use *any* quality of KDE-head debs, I only need to be
   able to aproximately compile and start some stuff to check features etc.
   It doesn't have to be anything near perfect or stable.
 
  Give me 24 hours or so.
 
 Absolutely no problem. But please (that's a plea only, no pressure in my
 voice) give feedback to the list as soon as there's *anything* available.

Update: I need to change /usr/share/kde3 to /usr/share for it to work
(long story), but my build box is suddenly unroutable due to @home being
stupid. Shit!

Ironic that it's always up when I'm tooling around just trying to get
the answer with no firm idea, yet when I know exactly what I want, it's
screwed. Great.

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* wiggy points people to arcanum.co.nz
wiggy apparently it's fun
asuffield wiggy: the last time you said that we lost an entire weekend
of useful activity to cocklefighting


pgpDWHJXgxVRL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Window Raise from konsole

2002-02-26 Thread Chris Halls
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Oleg Cherkasov wrote:
 I have process running in konsole, so I would like to bring this window up as 
 soon as something will happened in it.  The idea is to have a script which 
 accepts one argument, window name.  This window will be raised ...


The KDE 3 konsole will be much improved.  It talks about

Monitoring for activity and/or silence, sending of input to all sessions
(cluster management) [1]

Maybe the monitoring will do what you're after.

Chris

[1] http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.0-features.html
-- 
Chris Halls | Frankfurt, Germany | apt-proxy


pgpBDVKmIadUm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Rene Horn
This is fine if you want to do this, but I am of the opinion that putting up 
KDE3 now is superfluous work since it is on the verge of its stable release.  
I think if we wait a little longer, we would benefit more since we will 
eventually have to compile that anyway and compiling takes a while.

Rene

On Tuesday 26 February 2002 12:29 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:28:08PM +, Kyle Gordon wrote:
  On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 22:42, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
   not much heard about KDE3.deb lately. Are there any KDE3
   alpha/experimental debs around? Until last time when I worked upstream
   on karm Ivan's alpha stuff did fine for me, but that's no longer the
   case it seems.

 I have experimental .deb's which do not work. Everything segfaults on
 load, I'm going to check this out, but it could be due to a botched
 local qt3 install.

   I'd really could use *any* quality of KDE-head debs, I only need to be
   able to aproximately compile and start some stuff to check features
   etc. It doesn't have to be anything near perfect or stable.

 Give me 24 hours or so.

  I'm new to the list, so forgive me if I ask silly questions :-p
 
  On a related note to Tomas' post, I noticed KDE3 (well, the splash
  screen at least :-) went into the unstable release a few weeks ago, but
  as of yet there has been no further updates. Is this normal practice, or
  does KDE take a little bit longer to settle in with Debian??

 KDE3 is not in unstable, and won't be for some time.

-- 
Alternate email addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Window Raise from konsole

2002-02-26 Thread Oleg Cherkasov
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 13:35, Chris Halls wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Oleg Cherkasov wrote:
  I have process running in konsole, so I would like to bring this window
  up as soon as something will happened in it.  The idea is to have a
  script which accepts one argument, window name.  This window will be
  raised ...

 The KDE 3 konsole will be much improved.  It talks about

 Monitoring for activity and/or silence, sending of input to all sessions
 (cluster management) [1]

 Maybe the monitoring will do what you're after.

 Chris

 [1] http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.0-features.html

Thanks, but I found a solution for my problem: rxvt + xtctl

http://freshmeat.net/projects/xtctl/

Oleg




Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:

 Update: I need to change /usr/share/kde3 to /usr/share for it to work
 (long story), but my build box is suddenly unroutable due to @home being
 stupid. Shit!

 Ironic that it's always up when I'm tooling around just trying to get
 the answer with no firm idea, yet when I know exactly what I want, it's
 screwed. Great.

If you are having notorious problems with bandwidth/ horsepower/
connectivity I might try to help you. I'd take some time though. Please
contact me if that's the case.
*t


 Tomas Pospisek
 SourcePole   -  Linux  Open Source Solutions
 http://sourcepole.ch
 Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
 Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11





Re: packages tasksel expects to find in woody, that arn't there

2002-02-26 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Stone wrote:
 KDE is maintained, and works fine. kdelibs is sitting in incoming and
 AIUI needs an override to go in (even though it's not NEW). Most of its
 dependency problems are there; a kdebase package has also been prepared
 for upload to fix the other dependancy problem.
 
 Hopefully, with these uploads, meta-kde should hit woody.
 
 -d, crossing his fingers and knocking on wood(y?)

aj reminded me that there was a reason we were trying to avoid using
meta/task packages -- at least big ones that have the potential to go
boom easily, and the above is why. On the other hand I don't want to
have to track what is in the kde package by hand. So I have implemented
something in tasksel that will automatically explode the task package
into its dependancies and list all of those. Tasksel need only be
rebuilt when the deps change.

-- 
see shy jo




[±¤°í] È­ÀÌÆ®µ¥ÀÌ ÇູÀ̺¥Æ® 10

2002-02-26 Thread ·ÎÁî100
Title:100 































  



   .  .
,.   . 
. 

  . 


.
 .
+  E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] +












DCOP/KDE IPC error

2002-02-26 Thread Matt Reynolds
After installing the vncserver package, and running it several times, both 
as root and as myself, I'm now getting this error when logging into KDE.  
The startup screen shows Setting up IPC... and then displays the following 
message. 

'There was some error setting up inter-process communication for KDE. The
message returned by the system was:'
'Could not read the network connection list. 
/home/entropy/DCOPserver_hostname_:0'
'Please check that the dcopserver program is running!' 

I can still login as root and browse, but I'm completely stumped as to why 
this is happening. 

A bug filed against the VNC server package hints at permissions being munged 
after running it *before* KDE, but that isn't the case with me. 

I'm sorry I don't have more information.  I've tried removing the files 
related to the user from /tmp to no avail, as well as the .DCOP* files in 
the users home dir.  I can start the dcopserver from the command line, but 
this doesn't seem to affect logging in through KDM. 

I'm running unstable, and have had no problems till I ran the vncserver. 

Again, my apologies if this is not much.  Any help is appreciated.



Re: packages tasksel expects to find in woody, that arn't there

2002-02-26 Thread Chris Cheney
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:07:49AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
 Daniel Stone wrote:
  KDE is maintained, and works fine. kdelibs is sitting in incoming and
  AIUI needs an override to go in (even though it's not NEW). Most of its
  dependency problems are there; a kdebase package has also been prepared
  for upload to fix the other dependancy problem.
  
  Hopefully, with these uploads, meta-kde should hit woody.
  
  -d, crossing his fingers and knocking on wood(y?)
 
 aj reminded me that there was a reason we were trying to avoid using
 meta/task packages -- at least big ones that have the potential to go
 boom easily, and the above is why. On the other hand I don't want to
 have to track what is in the kde package by hand. So I have implemented
 something in tasksel that will automatically explode the task package
 into its dependancies and list all of those. Tasksel need only be
 rebuilt when the deps change.

I am adding the meta packages to each kde source so they are rebuilt
each time a new upload is done to fix any problems.

example)
kdelibs (meta) which depends on:
libkdecore
libkdecore-bin
(...)

then the kde (meta) package just depends on each of the others so it
won't go boom (in theory).

Chris




Re: KDE3 alpha .debs around?

2002-02-26 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 04:33 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
 Update: I need to change /usr/share/kde3 to /usr/share for it to work
 (long story), but my build box is suddenly unroutable due to @home being
 stupid. Shit!

 Ironic that it's always up when I'm tooling around just trying to get
 the answer with no firm idea, yet when I know exactly what I want, it's
 screwed. Great.

Daniel:  

Have posted you a private reply, bugus lives .. .

/me finds another bug in kde . . .  argh

-- 

Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls\/A GNU-Debian linux user\/ http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls
If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid. I SHOUT JUST FOR FUN.
Free software, in a free world, for a free spirit. Please Support freedom!




KDE 2.2.2 crash when it's compiled when objprelink

2002-02-26 Thread Josep Febrer Salord
I don't know if this is the appropiate place to discuss objprelink problems 
with KDE, but if someone can help me I apreciate it a lot.
I tried to build KDE 2.2.2 from the Debian  sources generating binary 
packages compiled with objprelink and optimizations for 686.
I get objprelink form: 
http://leon.bottou.com/objprelink/ 

I compiled Qt with the patch from this page with the  Debian sources 
generating a binary debian package.
After compiling and installing the Qt and kdelibs binaries that I generated I 
have no problems, but I don't notice anything especial.
Later I compiled kdebase always from the Debian sources with objprelink.
After installing these packages kdm crashes when it want to display the 
background image, but fortunatelly I can login. KDE seems to load more faster 
than ever but crashed when it want to launch kicker and absolutelly nothing 
appears.
From IceWM I started konqueror from an xterm and it loads amazing fast and 
their performance are very great but always crashed when I want to see the 
sidebar or want to display everything. On the contrary konsole is the only 
application that works and also loads fast.

I'm running woody with KDE 2.2.2 and their dependences from unstable with 
binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3-2.
From the Linux From Scratch project also I read this:
 You'll need the latest version of binutils (2.11.2 at this point), and if 
any of glibc, gcc or binutils were compiled with optimizations there is a 
chance that everything you prelink will segfault when run.  Prelinking failed 
for me on my LFS 2.4.3 system where those were built with optimizations; on a 
LFS 3.0 system where glibc, gcc and binutils were compiled with no 
optimizations and everything else was built -O3 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686, 
prelinking worked fine.  Proceed with caution.

Also I don't have any problems compiling KDE with objprelink.
Are there anyone that enjoy with objprelink on Debian?
Any help will be sincerelly appreciated, I felt the speed of objprelink on my 
P II 350, but I can't applied.




unsubscribe

2002-02-26 Thread Barry Price