Processed: [bts-link] source package kde-runtime
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kde-runtime # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). # remote status report for #677625 (http://bugs.debian.org/677625) # Bug title: kde-runtime: nepomuk spams .xsession-errors with FIXME debug message # * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300323 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 677625 + fixed-upstream Bug #677625 [kde-runtime] kde-runtime: nepomuk spams .xsession-errors with FIXME debug message Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 677625 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED Bug#677625: kde-runtime: nepomuk spams .xsession-errors with FIXME debug message There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677625 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134211108121084.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
[bts-link] source package kde-runtime
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kde-runtime # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #677625 (http://bugs.debian.org/677625) # Bug title: kde-runtime: nepomuk spams .xsession-errors with FIXME debug message # * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300323 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 677625 + fixed-upstream usertags 677625 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712163800.10772.30032.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
[bts-link] source package kdesdk
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdesdk # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #645667 (http://bugs.debian.org/645667) # Bug title: [umbrello] can't export on XHTML : failed to load HTTP resource # * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212723 # * remote status changed: (?) - UNCONFIRMED usertags 645667 + status-UNCONFIRMED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712163800.10772.64073.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
[bts-link] source package kdepim
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #529227 (http://bugs.debian.org/529227) # Bug title: akregator: Fails to properly select next item after deleting an item # * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119724 # * remote status changed: REOPENED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 529227 + fixed-upstream usertags 529227 - status-REOPENED usertags 529227 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712163800.10772.98620.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
Bug#681386: RM: kdeutils -- ROM; replaced by split sources
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, the monolithic kdeutils module has been split by upstream since KDE SC 4.8 in few smaller sources; the set of the KDE SC sources replacing kdeutils is: ark, filelight, kcalc, kcharselect, kdf, kfloppy, kgpg, kremotecontrol, ktimer, kwallet, superkaramba, printer-applet, sweeper The only loss package is kdeutils-dbg, but that is expected of course. Thanks, -- Pino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712193856.9620.62743.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Re: Trinity
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:41:43 +0200 Valerio Passini valerio.pass...@unicam.it wrote: KDE 3 was very good, but leave it in its era, without fancy desktops, social networks, streaming media services, huge data collections, and clouds. Mmm, this statement makes me want to start using KDE3 again. :) But in all fairness, it is perfectly possible to use KDE4 without all the social, semantic, and/or cloudy crap that's being pushed to Linux desktop in recent years. It just takes bit of tweaking. Regards, -- Andrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120712094447.2ed4c82c@hiker
Re: Trinity
On Thursday 12 Jul 2012 08:44:47 Andrej Kacian wrote: it is perfectly possible to use KDE4 without all the social, semantic, and/or cloudy crap that's being pushed to Linux desktop in recent years. It just takes bit of tweaking. That's prety much how I use KDE4. alexd
Re: Trinity
Hello, On 2012 m. of July 12 d., Thursday 00:10:57 Bruce Sass wrote: On July 9, 2012 01:54:05 PM hrvojes wrote: On Monday 09 of July 2012 15:48:01 john Culleton wrote: BTW KDE has gone down hill of late. It gets as many complaints as Vista it seems. My solution is simple. I use Trinity which is a clone of KDE 3.5. Try it, you might like it (or not.) Yes, the obvious solution is moving to obsoleted DE. I think you mean, STABLE, not obsoleted... Trinity is actively being developed (albeit slowly), and is a sane, somewhat lighter weight[1], alternative to the resource hungry bleeding edge which is KDE 4, for those who want a KDE experience without all the blood. Trinity discussion is completely irrelevant for debian-kde mailing list because: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. 2) Trinity is not and has never been KDE despite its origins So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207121540.28620.mo...@debian.org
Re: Trinity
On July 12, 2012 06:40:28 AM Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, On 2012 m. of July 12 d., Thursday 00:10:57 Bruce Sass wrote: On July 9, 2012 01:54:05 PM hrvojes wrote: On Monday 09 of July 2012 15:48:01 john Culleton wrote: BTW KDE has gone down hill of late. It gets as many complaints as Vista it seems. My solution is simple. I use Trinity which is a clone of KDE 3.5. Try it, you might like it (or not.) Yes, the obvious solution is moving to obsoleted DE. I think you mean, STABLE, not obsoleted... Trinity is actively being developed (albeit slowly), and is a sane, somewhat lighter weight[1], alternative to the resource hungry bleeding edge which is KDE 4, for those who want a KDE experience without all the blood. Trinity discussion is completely irrelevant for debian-kde mailing list because: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. 2) Trinity is not and has never been KDE despite its origins Despite its orgins as a continuation of the KDE-3.5 codebase, eh. ;) So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207121355.17951.bms...@shaw.ca
Re: Trinity
Hello, On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. FIY, nobody stepped up to take over maintainance of Qt 3 in Debian. So you can basically forget about KDE 3.5 at this point. 2) Trinity is not and has never been KDE despite its origins Despite its orgins as a continuation of the KDE-3.5 codebase, eh. ;) Everything about KDE 3.5 is long dead. No matter how good or bad it was, its base system (Qt 3) is not supported anymore. So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- We had this discussion before. It ended up in trolling and left a bad taste for everyone involved. this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. If anyone wanted to bring trinity to Debian, (s)he would have already done it. But every maintainer understands that it is impossible to provide good packages for outdated and basically abondoned software. All you do is encourage people to install random packages of bad quality. Eventually users will face problems and/or break systems, many have already broke. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Trinity
Hi, Alle giovedì 12 luglio 2012, Bruce Sass ha scritto: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. Not really; consider for example that qt3 has been removed recently from Debian (so squeeze is the last stable release with qt3), so any kind of reintrouction of it into the archive will not be that welcome. So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. No, debian-kde is definitely *not* the place for advertising Trinity in any form, nor for finding your users. Please bring Trinity away from this list, thank you. -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Trinity
On July 12, 2012 02:10:33 PM Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. FIY, nobody stepped up to take over maintainance of Qt 3 in Debian. So you can basically forget about KDE 3.5 at this point. 2) Trinity is not and has never been KDE despite its origins Despite its orgins as a continuation of the KDE-3.5 codebase, eh. ;) Everything about KDE 3.5 is long dead. No matter how good or bad it was, its base system (Qt 3) is not supported anymore. Trinity uses the KDE3.5 code and maintain Qt3 themselves, so it is not long dead nor unsupported. So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- We had this discussion before. It ended up in trolling and left a bad taste for everyone involved. That is unfortunate. :( this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. If anyone wanted to bring trinity to Debian, (s)he would have already done it. But every maintainer understands that it is impossible to provide good packages for outdated and basically abondoned software. It may be outdated from the perspective of KDE, but if people are working on it and maintaining its core then it is not abandoned. All you do is encourage people to install random packages of bad quality. Eventually users will face problems and/or break systems, many have already broke. random packages of bad quality... we must be talking about two different things... I am only considering Trinity--KDE-3.5, bits of KDE-4, and the toolkit it is built upon--not arbitrary packages which depend on Qt3. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207121522.05475.bms...@shaw.ca
Re: Trinity
Bruce Sass bms...@shaw.ca wrote: Bla bla bla Seriously ??? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/470dd0bf-bf8b-4829-b9b2-7d7d14ffa...@email.android.com
Re: Trinity
On July 12, 2012 03:37:38 PM Diederik de Haas wrote: Bruce Sass bms...@shaw.ca wrote: Bla bla bla Seriously ??? Yup -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207121542.09568.bms...@shaw.ca
Re: Trinity
On July 12, 2012 02:13:20 PM Pino Toscano wrote: Hi, Alle giovedì 12 luglio 2012, Bruce Sass ha scritto: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. Not really; consider for example that qt3 has been removed recently from Debian (so squeeze is the last stable release with qt3), so any kind of reintrouction of it into the archive will not be that welcome. That's a good thing... nobody should want old and unmaintained Qt3 apps in the archive. However, it may open the door a little more for the introduction of Trinity since there is now no pressure to accommodate arbitrary Qt3 based apps. So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. No, debian-kde is definitely *not* the place for advertising Trinity in any form, nor for finding your users. Please bring Trinity away from this list, thank you. Sure... all I wanted to do was correct some BS about Trinity being an obsolete clone of KDE-3.5. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207121540.31442.bms...@shaw.ca
Re: Trinity
On Thursday 12 July 2012 23:22:04 Bruce Sass wrote: On July 12, 2012 02:10:33 PM Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, On Thursday 12 July 2012 13:55:17 Bruce Sass wrote: 1) Trinity is not in Debian. True, but it has been packaged for Stable and Oldstable based systems which makes it more likely to eventually appear in Debian than some random piece of source out there. FIY, nobody stepped up to take over maintainance of Qt 3 in Debian. So you can basically forget about KDE 3.5 at this point. 2) Trinity is not and has never been KDE despite its origins Despite its orgins as a continuation of the KDE-3.5 codebase, eh. ;) Everything about KDE 3.5 is long dead. No matter how good or bad it was, its base system (Qt 3) is not supported anymore. Trinity uses the KDE3.5 code and maintain Qt3 themselves, so it is not long dead nor unsupported. Oh yes a handful of people are able to maintain 2 large projects with tons of code. Sure... So unless any of above changes, this is not a place for KDE is crap, Trinity rulez. Nowhere is a good place for: KDE is crap, Trinity rulez! However, given Trinity's origins (as KDE-3.5) and goals (be installed alongside and work with KDE-4 and apps), debian-kde is the best place within Debian for someone looking at introducing it into the archive to bring it up-- We had this discussion before. It ended up in trolling and left a bad taste for everyone involved. That is unfortunate. :( this is where the DD/DM expertise wrt KDE-3.5 and 4 resides, and this is the place with the most potential for finding interested users. If anyone wanted to bring trinity to Debian, (s)he would have already done it. But every maintainer understands that it is impossible to provide good packages for outdated and basically abondoned software. It may be outdated from the perspective of KDE, but if people are working on it and maintaining its core then it is not abandoned. All you do is encourage people to install random packages of bad quality. Eventually users will face problems and/or break systems, many have already broke. random packages of bad quality... we must be talking about two different things... I am only considering Trinity--KDE-3.5, bits of KDE-4, and the toolkit it is built upon--not arbitrary packages which depend on Qt3. - Bruce Martin Gräßlin recently wrote a nice blog entry about Trinity and its problems: http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2012/02/having-a-look-at-the-oldnew- desktop-environments/ -- Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207130009.23430.catd...@tuxzone.org
