Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema: > Martin Steigerwald > > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0. > > > > Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up? > > > > I read: > >* digikam 3.0.0 uses features from unreleased kdegraphics >=4.10 & > >ships a private version of the kdegraphics libs - this is not the > >Debian way > > : > > :-( * Unsatisfactory Conflicts: libkipi8, libkexiv2-10, libkdcraw20, > > > > libksane0 > > > > from the changelog. And can put the package on hold since my self built > > digikam 2.9.0 packages still work. > > [snip] > > It's a bit late to do this, but I have uploaded yesterday a fixed digikam > 2.9.0 to qt-kde.debian.net. I already replaced my self built 2.9 packages (see some earlier thread here) with those. Worked nicely. I have to keep those packages on hold to avoid having apt/aptitude try to update them to the 3.0 ones. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303171214.54147.mar...@lichtvoll.de
KDE SC 4.10
Hi! I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems José and others work on KDE SC 4.10. Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build some during the free week after the coming week. Anyway, keep up the good work. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303171601.32634.mar...@lichtvoll.de
Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
Martin Steigerwald > Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema: > > Martin Steigerwald > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0. > > > > > > Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up? > > > > > > I read: > > >* digikam 3.0.0 uses features from unreleased kdegraphics >=4.10 & > > >ships a private version of the kdegraphics libs - this is not the > > >Debian way > > > : > > > :-( * Unsatisfactory Conflicts: libkipi8, libkexiv2-10, libkdcraw20, > > > > > > libksane0 > > > > > > from the changelog. And can put the package on hold since my self built > > > digikam 2.9.0 packages still work. > > > [snip] > > > > It's a bit late to do this, but I have uploaded yesterday a fixed digikam > > 2.9.0 to qt-kde.debian.net. > > I already replaced my self built 2.9 packages (see some earlier thread > here) with those. Worked nicely. I have to keep those packages on hold to > avoid having apt/aptitude try to update them to the 3.0 ones. > > Thanks, I guess you had to put them on hold to upgrade from your custom packages to the qt-kde.d.n ones, afaik that's unavoidable unless you comment out the experimental line in your sources.list first. But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the packages on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages in experimental? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the > experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the packages > on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages in > experimental? If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a safe- upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages. If experimental's prio is >= 100 then a full-upgrade does want to upgrade digikam to the 3.0.0 versions and suggest to remove a bunch of other packages because of unresolved dependencies. A safe-upgrade (still) doesn't upgrade it to version 3.0.0, but only says that there are 2 upgradeable packages (also digikam-data). With digikam on hold, neither full-upgrade or safe-upgrade wants to upgrade. So 'normally' you don't need to put digikam on hold, unless you've changed experimental's priority through /etc/apt/preferences(.d/). HTH, Diederik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303172301.36309.didi.deb...@cknow.org
Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
Diederik de Haas > On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > > But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the > > experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the > > packages on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages > > in experimental? > > If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a > safe- upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0 > packages. > > If experimental's prio is >= 100 then a full-upgrade does want to upgrade > digikam to the 3.0.0 versions and suggest to remove a bunch of other > packages because of unresolved dependencies. A safe-upgrade (still) > doesn't upgrade it to version 3.0.0, but only says that there are 2 > upgradeable packages (also digikam-data). > With digikam on hold, neither full-upgrade or safe-upgrade wants to > upgrade. > > So 'normally' you don't need to put digikam on hold, unless you've changed > experimental's priority through /etc/apt/preferences(.d/). > > HTH, > Diederik Thanks, but I already know what apt priority is. I can also read 'man apt_preferences' myself. And I also already know the reply to my question will be probably "No". signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > Thanks Sorry. Won't bother you again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303172358.09983.diederik.deh...@gmail.com
Re: digikam 3.0 not co-installable with some parts of KDE
Diederik de Haas > On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > > Thanks > > Sorry. Won't bother you again. You didn't bother me, so don't worry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
