Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Am Mittwoch 13 Mai 2015, 08:35:00 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
> El Tuesday 12 May 2015, Jimmy Johnson escribió:
> > Christian this is what I get after running the upgrade:
> (...)
> 
> > I was a little concerned with ruby being removed so I did not
> > complete the upgrade.
> 
> I think that you are missing the point. Christian's concern
> wasn't how to do the installation, or if something might not
> be 100% smooth. The point is that this is random software
> found on the web, and if you install it without even knowing
> the nickname of the person who did the packaging, you are
> doing a huge leap of faith. You are installing plenty of
> untrusted programs. Plus running maintainer scripts with root
> permissions.

Exactly. And this is why Alejandro advised to read the sources in 
order to ensure nobody messed with them. (To be really sure, one
would still need to build the binary packages from the audited 
sources on a trusted machine - it is all about trust here.)

Anyway, thanks again, guys. I guess I will not be doing that huge 
leap of faith, this time. :)

Regards,

Christian

-- 
kernel concepts GmbH   Tel: +49-271-771091-11
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48
D-57072 Siegen
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Tuesday 12 May 2015, Jimmy Johnson escribió:
> Christian this is what I get after running the upgrade:
(...) 
> I was a little concerned with ruby being removed so I did not complete
> the upgrade.

I think that you are missing the point. Christian's concern wasn't how to do 
the installation, or if something might not be 100% smooth. The point is that 
this is random software found on the web, and if you install it without even 
knowing the nickname of the person who did the packaging, you are doing a huge 
leap of faith. You are installing plenty of untrusted programs. Plus running 
maintainer scripts with root permissions.

-- 
Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201505130835.00730@badopi.org



Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi Jimmy,

Am Dienstag 12 Mai 2015, 07:53:12 schrieb Jimmy Johnson:
> [...] 
> Christian this is what I get after running the upgrade:
> jimmy# upgrade-system
> 1) Updating package lists:
> I: Package lists updated.
> 2) Checking for upgradable packages:
> I: Installing upgradable packages...
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... The following packages were
> automatically installed and are no longer required:
> [...]
> plasma-scriptengine-ruby ruby-kde4 ruby-plasma ruby-qt4
>ruby-qt4-webkit
> Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
> Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>libmarblewidget19* libnepomuk4* libnepomukquery4a*
> libnepomukutils4* The following NEW packages will be
> installed:
>baloo-utils baloo4 libakonadi-socialutils4 libatasmart-bin
> [...]
> 191 upgraded, 12 newly installed, 4 to remove and 0 not
> upgraded. Need to get 249 MB of archives.
> After this operation, 14.4 MB of additional disk space will be
> used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> 
> I was a little concerned with ruby being removed so I did not
> complete the upgrade.

Check the output of APT closely, it reveals what will actually 
happen:

There's "The following packages will be REMOVED" section, which 
lists packages which will indeed be removed if you choose to 
continue the upgrade.

Then, there's "The following packages were automatically 
installed and are no longer required", which lists packages to 
which, after the upgrade, no dependencies could be found. Under 
this category, some Ruby packages are listed. They will not be 
automatically removed. APT tells you how to get rid of them, if 
you choose to. Moreover, it is not Ruby itself, but some KDE 
packages with ruby stuff. These are no longer needed after the 
upgrade, either since the newer KDE does not make use of Ruby any 
more, or since there's some optional support for some stuff in 
KDE which needs Ruby, but which the package creator did not 
switch on.

HTH,

Christian

-- 
kernel concepts GmbH   Tel: +49-271-771091-11
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48
D-57072 Siegen
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Jimmy Johnson

On 05/12/2015 07:34 AM, Christian Hilberg wrote:

Hi Jimmy,

Am Dienstag 12 Mai 2015, 07:02:04 schrieb Jimmy Johnson:

On 05/12/2015 02:02 AM, Christian Hilberg wrote:

Hi all,

seeking for a less-painful-than-self-compile way to get
KDEPIM
4.14.7 into Debian/Jessie (for much the same reasons as
pointed out by the OP), I stumbled across

http://kdebian.org/ppa/




Christian, this may help you:
"KDE updated in Debian, here's how. In this guide we will see
how to have KDE in Debian constantly updated thanks to
third-party repositories KDEbian."
http://media-opensource.blogspot.com/2014/09/kde-updated-in-deb
ian-heres-how.html




Thanks for the hint. This is one of the above-mentioned blogs
linking to http://kdebian.org/.

I'm still somewhat reluctant to use this repo, for no other
reason than the creator of the PPA hiding. Undoubtedly, there may
be good reasons to do so. But it gives me a hard time trusting in
it.

Sure, I can always read the sources, as has been suggested in
another reply. :-) I did not do that for the packages I've got
from Debian, because the fact that they do not even try to hide
who they are makes me feel I can trust them. This is not the case
for http://kdebian.org/.

However, thanks dear Debian folks, thanks dear Debian community.
You're great.



Christian this is what I get after running the upgrade:
jimmy# upgrade-system
1) Updating package lists:
I: Package lists updated.
2) Checking for upgradable packages:
I: Installing upgradable packages...
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... The following packages were automatically 
installed and are no longer required:
  libkactivities-models1 libnepomukcore4 libokularcore5 
libparted-fs-resize0 libqtruby4shared2
  libsmokekdecore4-3 libsmokekdeui4-3 libsmokekfile3 libsmokekhtml3 
libsmokekio3 libsmokeknewstuff2-3
  libsmokeknewstuff3-3 libsmokekparts3 libsmokektexteditor3 
libsmokekutils3 libsmokeplasma3
  libsmokeqtopengl4-3 nepomuk-core-data plasma-scriptengine-ruby 
ruby-kde4 ruby-plasma ruby-qt4

  ruby-qt4-webkit
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libmarblewidget19* libnepomuk4* libnepomukquery4a* libnepomukutils4*
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  baloo-utils baloo4 libakonadi-socialutils4 libatasmart-bin 
libjs-underscore libkfbapi1
  libmarblewidget20 libmygpo-qt1 libnatspec0 libokularcore6 
libqtcurve-utils1 libqzeitgeist1

The following packages will be upgraded:
  akonadi-backend-mysql akonadi-server amarok amarok-common 
amarok-utils ark dolphin freespacenotifier
  gtk2-engines-qtcurve gwenview kate-data katepart kcalc 
kde-base-artwork kde-baseapps
  kde-baseapps-bin kde-baseapps-data kde-plasma-desktop kde-runtime 
kde-runtime-data kde-style-oxygen
  kde-style-qtcurve kde-wallpapers kde-wallpapers-default 
kde-window-manager kde-workspace
  kde-workspace-bin kde-workspace-data kde-workspace-kgreet-plugins 
kde-workspace-randr
  kdegames-card-data kdelibs-bin kdelibs5-data kdelibs5-plugins 
kdepasswd kdepim-runtime
  kdepimlibs-kio-plugins kdf kdm kdoctools kfind kget khelpcenter4 
kinfocenter kio-audiocd klipper
  kmenuedit kmix konq-plugins konqueror konqueror-nsplugins konsole 
konversation konversation-data
  kpartsplugin kpat ksysguard ksysguardd ksystemlog ktorrent 
ktorrent-data kwin-style-crystal
  kwin-style-qtcurve kwrite libakonadi-calendar4 libakonadi-contact4 
libakonadi-kabc4 libakonadi-kcal4
  libakonadi-kde4 libakonadi-kmime4 libakonadi-notes4 
libakonadiprotocolinternals1 libastro1
  libbaloocore4 libbaloofiles4 libbalooqueryparser4 libbaloowidgets4 
libbalooxapian4 libdbusmenu-qt2
  libgpgme++2 libkabc4 libkactivities-bin libkactivities6 libkalarmcal2 
libkatepartinterfaces4
  libkcal4 libkcalcore4 libkcalutils4 libkcddb4 libkcmutils4 
libkcompactdisc4 libkdcraw-data
  libkdcraw23 libkde3support4 libkdeclarative5 libkdecorations4abi2 
libkdecore5 libkdegames6abi1
  libkdesu5 libkdeui5 libkdewebkit5 libkdnssd4 libkemoticons4 
libkephal4abi1 libkexiv2-11
  libkexiv2-data libkfile4 libkfilemetadata4 libkholidays4 libkhtml5 
libkidletime4 libkimap4 libkio5
  libkipi-data libkipi11 libkjsapi4 libkjsembed4 libkldap4 libkmbox4 
libkmediaplayer4 libkmime4
  libknewstuff2-4 libknewstuff3-4 libknotifyconfig4 libkntlm4 
libkonq-common libkonq5-templates
  libkonq5abi1 libkonqsidebarplugin4a libkparts4 libkpimidentities4 
libkpimtextedit4 libkpimutils4
  libkprintutils4 libkpty4 libkresources4 libkrosscore4 
libkscreensaver5 libksgrd4 libksignalplotter4
  libktexteditor4 libkunitconversion4 libkutils4 libkwineffects1abi5 
libkwinglesutils1
  libkwinglutils1abi2 libkworkspace4abi2 libkxmlrpcclient4 
libmailtransport4 libmicroblog4 libphonon4
  libplasma-geolocation-interface4 libplasma3 libplasmaclock4abi4 
libplasmagenericshell4
  libpolkit-qt-1-1 libprocesscore4abi1 libprocessui4a libqca2 
libqgpgme1 libqmobipocket1 libsolid4
  libsyndication4 libtaskmanager4abi4 libth

Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi Jimmy,

Am Dienstag 12 Mai 2015, 07:02:04 schrieb Jimmy Johnson:
> On 05/12/2015 02:02 AM, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > seeking for a less-painful-than-self-compile way to get
> > KDEPIM
> > 4.14.7 into Debian/Jessie (for much the same reasons as
> > pointed out by the OP), I stumbled across
> > 
> > http://kdebian.org/ppa/
> > 
> > While this repo seems to have all of the packages I'm after,
> > I do not really know to make heads or tails of it.
> > 
> > There site does not mention any maintainer. The owner of the
> > domain hides behind some privacy service. There seems to be
> > some connection to a live.ru account, but that does not
> > necessarily mean anything.
> > 
> > Other than being referred to from some blog posts, I did not
> > find any information as to whether or not this PPA can be
> > trusted. I for one do *not* trust, because of missing
> > information about who's behind that PPA, but maybe there is
> > some info about this site I missed?
> > 
> > Anyway, the DSC files from that repo might be worth a look
> > when trying to set up some trustworthy alternative to it,
> > which would surely be of a great relief to Debian/Jessie
> > KDEPIM users.
> Christian, this may help you:
> "KDE updated in Debian, here's how. In this guide we will see
> how to have KDE in Debian constantly updated thanks to
> third-party repositories KDEbian."
> http://media-opensource.blogspot.com/2014/09/kde-updated-in-deb
> ian-heres-how.html

Thanks for the hint. This is one of the above-mentioned blogs 
linking to http://kdebian.org/.

I'm still somewhat reluctant to use this repo, for no other 
reason than the creator of the PPA hiding. Undoubtedly, there may 
be good reasons to do so. But it gives me a hard time trusting in 
it.

Sure, I can always read the sources, as has been suggested in 
another reply. :-) I did not do that for the packages I've got 
from Debian, because the fact that they do not even try to hide 
who they are makes me feel I can trust them. This is not the case 
for http://kdebian.org/.

However, thanks dear Debian folks, thanks dear Debian community.
You're great.

Christian

-- 
kernel concepts GmbH   Tel: +49-271-771091-11
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48
D-57072 Siegen
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Jimmy Johnson

On 05/12/2015 02:02 AM, Christian Hilberg wrote:

Hi all,

seeking for a less-painful-than-self-compile way to get KDEPIM
4.14.7 into Debian/Jessie (for much the same reasons as pointed
out by the OP), I stumbled across

http://kdebian.org/ppa/

While this repo seems to have all of the packages I'm after, I do
not really know to make heads or tails of it.

There site does not mention any maintainer. The owner of the
domain hides behind some privacy service. There seems to be some
connection to a live.ru account, but that does not necessarily
mean anything.

Other than being referred to from some blog posts, I did not find
any information as to whether or not this PPA can be trusted. I
for one do *not* trust, because of missing information about
who's behind that PPA, but maybe there is some info about this
site I missed?

Anyway, the DSC files from that repo might be worth a look when
trying to set up some trustworthy alternative to it, which would
surely be of a great relief to Debian/Jessie KDEPIM users.



Christian, this may help you:
"KDE updated in Debian, here's how. In this guide we will see how to 
have KDE in Debian constantly updated thanks to third-party repositories 
KDEbian." 
http://media-opensource.blogspot.com/2014/09/kde-updated-in-debian-heres-how.html 


--
Jimmy Johnson

Debian Sid - KDE 4.14.2 - AMD64 - EXT4 at sda14
Registered Linux User #380263


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/555207dc.9000...@gmail.com



Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Tuesday 12 May 2015, Christian Hilberg escribió:
> Hi all,
> 
> seeking for a less-painful-than-self-compile way to get KDEPIM
> 4.14.7 into Debian/Jessie (for much the same reasons as pointed
> out by the OP), I stumbled across
> 
>   http://kdebian.org/ppa/
> 
> While this repo seems to have all of the packages I'm after, I do
> not really know to make heads or tails of it.
> 
> There site does not mention any maintainer. The owner of the
> domain hides behind some privacy service. There seems to be some
> connection to a live.ru account, but that does not necessarily
> mean anything.

Opened the akonadi package (first one alphabetically), and the author of the 
latest changelog entry is Nikolay Romanov 
 
> Other than being referred to from some blog posts, I did not find
> any information as to whether or not this PPA can be trusted. I
> for one do *not* trust, because of missing information about
> who's behind that PPA, but maybe there is some info about this
> site I missed?

The sources. :)

> Anyway, the DSC files from that repo might be worth a look when
> trying to set up some trustworthy alternative to it, which would
> surely be of a great relief to Debian/Jessie KDEPIM users.

I haven't inspected all of them, just akonadi. But for it, there are sources 
(and I haven't inspected que quality). That doesn't mean the work done for 
those packages can be reused.

Making a quick and dirty package for yourself can be done in minutes if for 
your use case some things are irrelevant. But that is not normally the case of 
official packages.

-- 
Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201505121514.20963@badopi.org



Re: Re: Newer KDEPIM for Jessie

2015-05-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi all,

seeking for a less-painful-than-self-compile way to get KDEPIM 
4.14.7 into Debian/Jessie (for much the same reasons as pointed 
out by the OP), I stumbled across

http://kdebian.org/ppa/

While this repo seems to have all of the packages I'm after, I do 
not really know to make heads or tails of it.

There site does not mention any maintainer. The owner of the 
domain hides behind some privacy service. There seems to be some 
connection to a live.ru account, but that does not necessarily 
mean anything.

Other than being referred to from some blog posts, I did not find 
any information as to whether or not this PPA can be trusted. I 
for one do *not* trust, because of missing information about 
who's behind that PPA, but maybe there is some info about this 
site I missed?

Anyway, the DSC files from that repo might be worth a look when 
trying to set up some trustworthy alternative to it, which would 
surely be of a great relief to Debian/Jessie KDEPIM users.

Kind regards,

Christian

-- 
kernel concepts GmbH   Tel: +49-271-771091-11
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48
D-57072 Siegen
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.