Bug#784454: [calligra] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: calligra Version: 1:2.8.5+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132224.ga22...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784479: [kde4libs] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kde4libs Version: 4:4.14.2-5 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132430.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784480: [kdepim] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdepim Version: 4:4.14.2-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132435.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784483: [kdevelop] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdevelop Version: 4:4.7.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132447.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784482: [kdeplasma-addons] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdeplasma-addons Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian/Ubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132444.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784481: [kdepim-runtime] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdepim-runtime Version: 4:4.14.2-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132441.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784477: [kde-runtime] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kde-runtime Version: 4:4.14.2-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132422.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784474: [kalgebra] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kalgebra Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132408.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784478: [kde-workspace] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kde-workspace Version: 4:4.11.13-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132428.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784491: [libkgapi] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: libkgapi Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Debian/Ubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132517.ga24...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784484: [kdevplatform] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdevplatform Version: 1.7.0-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132453.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784492: [marble] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: marble Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132524.ga24...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784485: [kdevelop-php-docs] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: kdevelop-php-docs Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132450.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784511: [pykde4] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: pykde4 Version: 4:4.14.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132652.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784516: [qmf] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: qmf Version: 1.0.7~2011w23.2-2.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132708.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784517: [qtruby] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: qtruby Version: 4:4.11.3-4.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132710.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784528: [smokeqt] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: smokeqt Version: 4:4.12.2-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132800.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784522: [qzion] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: qzion Version: 0.4.0+lgpl-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Krap Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132730.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#784525: [rocs] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: rocs Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506132744.ga25...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: qt3 and ptrdiff_t build error
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:12:51PM +, Tiana Rakotovao Andriamahefa wrote: Hi all, The build of an application using qt3 always fails into this kind of error (with GCC-4.6) : In file included from /usr/include/qt3/qmime.h:46:0, from /usr/include/qt3/qevent.h:48, from /usr/include/qt3/qobject.h:48, from /usr/include/qt3/qwidget.h:46, from /usr/include/qt3/qmainwindow.h:45, from main.cc:9: /usr/include/qt3/qmap.h:607:13: error: ‘ptrdiff_t’ does not name a type make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/qconf.o] Erreur 1 make: *** [xconfig] Erreur 2 And including stddef.h resolves well this problem. So, I would like to ask you if qt3 is still maintained so that it is for example possible to add include stddef.h in some qt3 headers? Or should stddef.h always be included by our program. Hi Tiana, Qt3 is not maintained anymore in Debian. Last stable version of Debian shipping Qt3 is Squeeze with GCC 4.4. IIRC the problem you reported was fixed in one of the uploads of Qt3 made after the release of Squeeze, if you grab the latest upload of Qt3 from http://snapshot.debian.org it is possible this problem is fixed there. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130116063156.ga28...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#678210: RM: qt-x11-free -- RoQA; obsolete libraries, dead upstream, superseeded by Qt4
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal \o/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120619215959.ga17...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#673464: RM: koffice -- ROM; dead-upstream, superseeded by Calligra
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove koffice from the archive. The development of KOffice is almost dead since most of the development team moved efforts to Calligra. For casual readers of this bug: note that Calligra is still not in the Debian archive and might not to make it into wheezy. But KOffice is not in a good state to be allowed into Wheezy. Thanks, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120518205408.ga13...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#673466: RM: koffice-l10n -- ROM; should be removed with koffice
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please removed koffice-l10n together with the removal of koffice (#673464) Thanks, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120518205755.ga14...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#663511: RM: kaboom -- ROM; obsolete, not longer needed
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove kaboom. It is a settings migration wizard used from KDE 3 to KDE 4 and it shouldn't be shipped with wheezy. Thanks, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120311200122.ga32...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#651825: Recommends a package that is not in the Debian archive
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:46:28PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: I am also wondering how useful is to keep this package around without sagemath in the Debian archive? If sagemath is installed manually, the path to the manual installation can be provided in the settings inside cantor and the backend would work. So this bug probably could be solved adding a bit in the description warning the users they will need to install sagemath manually and adding more complete instructions about how to set the path in the README.Debian. About the Recommends: sagemath, I think it is better to remove it directly instead of a demote to Suggests since the part about sagemath would be already documented in the description and if we want to use properly recommends/suggests/depends, cantor-backend-sage needs a depende in sagemath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111212140407.ga7...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#556686: quick update
Hi, Do not bother about fixing this bug, the short-term plan is removing libwv from Debian. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110911210947.ga8...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Qt3 looking for adopters
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:36:05PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: It has 21 bugs. The important point here is you would become also *upstream*. No they are trinirty qt3 :) I do not know if you have realized that trinity is about KDE 3 and they have hope of migrating it to Qt 4 ... Could you offer me sponsorship ? I am not going to sponsor something that I think should be removed from Debian ... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504180957.ga18...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#625502: O: qt-x11-free -- Qt GUI Library
Package: wnpp Severity: normal kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed quite soon. This means the KDE team is not longer interested in Qt3 and we are looking for new maintainer(s). More information at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00056.html Adopting Qt3 require skills and time since you would have to do the upstream work. Consider carefully this before adopting Qt3. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503220654.ga30...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Qt3 looking for adopters (orphaned now)
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 07:56:26PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: Hi, kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed quite soon. This means the KDE team is not longer interested in Qt3 and we are looking for new maintainer(s). Personally, I would have gone for removing Qt3 too but the following concerns have been raised: - latest LSB 4.1 still needs Qt3 - some software using Qt3 do not have any replacement (twinkle has mentioned for several users). There is a list of packages using Qt 3 at [1] and even if Qt3 is kept in the archive, I am planning to do a QA round of all the packages using Qt3. - there seem to be a lot of people using their Qt 3 software and Debian in scientific environments. Qt 3 was EOL'ed in July 2007 [2], so if you decide to adopt Qt 3 you won't have any support by upstream. Also, if you adopt the package, please coordinate with the KDE team so we can push some final changes. If there are no adopters in the next 3 weeks, I will do an orphaning upload (and file the O: bug) with the changes mentioned earlier. Change of plans. Due the switch to GCC 4.6, 48 packages using Qt 3 failed to build from source. This was already reported against Qt3 with a patch, see bug report #611255 (Thanks Riddell!) and Modestas did a quick upload fixing the issue plus the other final issues we wanted to address. See changelog [1] We took advantage of the upload to also orphan Qt3. Orphaning bug is #625502. If you want Qt3 is wheezy (or any of the packages that need Qt3), please, step up soon. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2011/05/msg00294.html Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503222439.ga30...@pryan.ekaia.org
Qt3 looking for adopters
Hi, kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed quite soon. This means the KDE team is not longer interested in Qt3 and we are looking for new maintainer(s). Personally, I would have gone for removing Qt3 too but the following concerns have been raised: - latest LSB 4.1 still needs Qt3 - some software using Qt3 do not have any replacement (twinkle has mentioned for several users). There is a list of packages using Qt 3 at [1] and even if Qt3 is kept in the archive, I am planning to do a QA round of all the packages using Qt3. - there seem to be a lot of people using their Qt 3 software and Debian in scientific environments. Qt 3 was EOL'ed in July 2007 [2], so if you decide to adopt Qt 3 you won't have any support by upstream. Also, if you adopt the package, please coordinate with the KDE team so we can push some final changes. If there are no adopters in the next 3 weeks, I will do an orphaning upload (and file the O: bug) with the changes mentioned earlier. Ana PS: cc'me in replies [1] http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemoval [2] http://qt.nokia.com/about/news/archive/press.2007-01-22.4604809587/) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#620576: kdelibs: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:43:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Package: kdelibs Version: 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch Hi folks, The attached patch has just been applied to the Ubuntu kdelibs package, to null out the dependency_libs field in the libtool .la file being shipped in the -dev package. This is generally a good idea because it avoids causing consumers of your library to require other .la files listed here to be available at build time when they're not actually needed (i.e., in the dynamic linking common case). It's specifically a good idea right now because multiarch is imminent, and that means the .la files referenced here are going to *move* soon, causing build failures for anything using libtool to build against kdelibs. As long as kdelibs is going to need a rebuild to fix up the invalid .la references, it would be nice to get rid of them altogether. (Alternatively, since I guess kde3 libs are supposed to be dropped soon, you might just let this go unfixed and become a FTBFS for reverse-deps? Your See #619728. Celestia NMU is entering in 3 days, and I filed removals today for the other 2 blocking packages :-) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110402214610.ga29...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: KDE-SC 4.6.x?
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: Hi, I am just curious where the development and discussion to KDE-SC 4.6.x is happening. Look in http://git.debian.org for pkg-kde repositories. e.g.: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-sc/kde4libs.git;a=summary Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401132347.ga25...@ekaia.org
Re: contribution to koffice packaging
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Adrien wrote: En cette agréable journée du dimanche 27 mars 2011, Ana Guerrero a écrit : Hi Adrien, I am sorry I did not answer you before, I do not read this list very often. As you might know, koffice is not going to be around a lot of time longer in Debian and it is going to be replaced by Calligra. If you want to help, a needed task is looking at all the pending bugs and: - checking what are fixed in Calligra (action: mark them with a user-tag) - what bugs do not apply anymore (action: close them) - what bugs should be forwarded to upstream.(action you forward them to kde bugzilla [1] [2] ok so I start with this work. If I am doing wrong, just let me know ;-) So far, it is good, but you need to Cc' the reported of the bug or they won't get any email. Submitters do not get subscribed to bugs automatically:/ Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110330213022.ga5...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#619728: RM: kdelibs -- ROM; obsolete
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove kdelibs from the archive. Squeeze shipped with KDE 4 as default KDE desktop and it still included kdelibs from KDE 3 for transitioning. The KDE team does not want to keep KDE 3 libraries for Wheezy. Most of the rdepends has been already removed from Debian and others are filed waiting to be removed. There are some packages that have a replacement or they are waiting for a upload to remove the kde3 support, I will add the blocking bugs for those. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110326142556.ga4...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#619729: RM: arts -- ROM; obsolete
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal arts provided the sound system to the now obsolete KDE 3. Please remove it! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110326143011.ga5...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: eigen3 packages
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:26:13PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: On Thursday 24 March 2011 15:50:48 Anton Gladky wrote: Dear QT and KDE maintainers, I have prepared the package for the new release 3.0 of mathematical library eigen. I have based it on the previous eigen2 release. What has been done: * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format * DEP-5 for copyright file * Added watch file * Added doc-base file * Added upstream Changelog file from their website lintian -IE --pedantic gives warnings on absent ITP-bug (I will add this bug, when somebody will review this package), and one warning about .hg-files in the source tarball. I would be glad if somebody review and upload the package: Hi Anton! As far as I understand, eigen is maintained under the Qt/KDE team umbrella. Would you like to join us maintaining this package? If so, please read http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org and join us on IRC, #debian-qt-kde on OFTC. anton, as said this morning in IRC, please go to https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-kde/ and Request to join (you will need to create an alioth account. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110325130311.ga29...@ekaia.org
plans for ggz-kde-* packages?
Hi! What are you plans for ggz-kde-client and ggz-kde-games? You probably have read already the bugs filed by Eckhart Wörner about the removal of the KDE3 libraries filed some months ago. There are a KDE4 port coming soon or should be removed? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227125304.ga22...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: kde-extras packages using kdelibs4c2a
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:30AM +, Fathi Boudra wrote: Hello, On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: * kasablanca * kbarcode There's a port in progress but it's stuck since a year: http://gitorious.org/kbarcode-kde4 I am going to file removal from them. If the ports are finished in the future, we can reintroduce them in the archive. * keep * kfocus * klibido * kmobiletools * kpogre * ksniffer * kvdr * lensfun * libkipi * taskjuggler None of them seem to have a working KDE 4 port (except taskjuggler having something in ruby...). I guess we can go ahead and file them all for removal? +1 Except for lensfun, I filed the removal for all of those. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227144719.ga24...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: plans for ggz-kde-* packages?
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Josef Spillner wrote: ¡Hola! For wheezy they should be removed, as there are KDE 4 successors waiting in the pipeline. Admittedly they've been waiting there in dormant state for several months, but it'd give us a good motivation to work on them again :-) Thanks for the quick answer! I am filing the removal bugs. Ana Josef :: Ana Guerrero Sonntag 27 Februar 2011 Hi! What are you plans for ggz-kde-client and ggz-kde-games? You probably have read already the bugs filed by Eckhart Wörner about the removal of the KDE3 libraries filed some months ago. There are a KDE4 port coming soon or should be removed? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227145019.ga24...@pryan.ekaia.org
kprof removal?
Hi Jeremy, I was wondering if it is time to ask for the removal of kprof. kprof did not make into Squeeze due to a RC bug and it uses kdelibs from KDE3 that as you might know we are trying to remove from the archive. (See bug: http://bugs.debian.org/604303) Do you know if there is a port for KDE 4? Could I go ahead and file for removal? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226190927.ga30...@pryan.ekaia.org
kde-extras packages using kdelibs4c2a
Hi folks! This is the list of packages using kdelibs4c2a maintained by kde-extras people. * kasablanca * kbarcode * keep * kfocus * klibido * kmobiletools * kpogre * ksniffer * kvdr * lensfun * libkipi * taskjuggler None of them seem to have a working KDE 4 port (except taskjuggler having something in ruby...). I guess we can go ahead and file them all for removal? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226201605.ga32...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Bug#615129: RM: qt-x11-free/3:3.3.8b-7, kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5
Hi Jonathan, On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:29:45PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Tags: moreinfo Hi, There seems to be some interest in removing kde3 and qt3 before wheezy is released. This bug is meant to track that process and request removal of those packages from testing when it is finished. Tagged moreinfo because it seems valuable to confirm that the maintainers of those packages are okay with the removal once the blockers are dealt with. :) It is great you want to help with this. We have already working on this, could you please join #debian-qt-kde and coodinate with us? Specially notice than removal of qt3 and kde3libs should be tracked separately. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226004142.ga18...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#581946: kdelibs4c2a: perl-suid is going away with Perl 5.12
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:52:51PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:21:26PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: Package: kdelibs4c2a Version: 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-3 Severity: minor User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org Usertags: perl-5.12-transition Perl 5.12 (currently in experimental) removed support for suidperl, so the perl-suid Debian package is going away too. If one believes grep -r '#!/usr/bin/perl' . and debian/kdelibs4c2a.lintian then the only suidperl script is kio/misc/fileshareset Searching for other references to this script finds a thread which ends with http://lists.mandriva.com/cooker/2010-03/msg00690.php which isn't conclusive. Couldn't find anything on https://bugs.kde.org/ Hopefully someone who's more familiar with the KDE project can do a bit more digging on this, perhaps filing a bug upstream? Hi Dominic, kdelibs4c2a, that is kdelibs from KDE3, is dead ustream and we are trying actively to remove it from the archive. See http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110211231101.ga5...@ekaia.org
release notes for KDE done
And after a final small update (rev8166) the part for KDE is done. And the uprade path fixed, thanks Modestas!! Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110119220105.ga1...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Bug#609255: release-notes: kde4 is new in squeeze
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:52:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: (x-debbugs-cc to the qt/kde maintainers) squeeze is the first debian release to include kde4. Could one of the maintainers provide some text for the release notes? I think we need at least: - a section in the What's new in Debian 6.0 chapter with some highlights and major differences with previous releases - a section in the Issues to be aware of chapter with the most prominent transition issues, if any Versions that Squeeze will ship: KDE SC 4.4.5 with kdepim 4.4.7 Qt 4.6.3 Stuff we have to write about from the top of my head: - KDE 3 is dead, but kdelibs and some KDE 3 apps are still in the archive. - Also Qt 3 is around and some apps using it. - kdelibs from KDE 3 and Qt 3 won't be in the next Debian release. - changes in the metapackages, plasma-desktop vs plasma-netbook - kaboom, migrating your settings from KDE 3 to KDE 4: http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kaboom.html Let's wait a couple of days in case something important is missing and I will write the final text. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110107202238.ga30...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#604827: please build against libwpd 0.9.0/libwpg 0.2.0
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:56:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Package: koffice Severity: wishlist Tags: experimental libwpd 0.9.0 and libwpg 0.2.0 were released and are already in experimental. You get this report because your package (build-)depends on it. There's API and ABI changed there so it needs a transition. To make it the least painful many packages should migrate quickly at least in experimental so they can be uploaded to sid together (or at least in short delays) when it's due time. This will be fixed in the first upload of Calligra, an self-fork from koffice, that will be replacing koffice in the Debian archive. Hopefully this will hapen whithin the next 2 months. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110106164322.ga5...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#597469: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (Re: Bug#597469: qt4-x11: ftbfs buildd ran out of disk space)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Thanks for caring about Qt4. Sadly, buildds running out of space is something that happens often and filing bugs about this issue is not useful given there is nothing that can be done from the maintainers. this build failure is holding up migration of a security fix to testing. the maintainers can/should request a rebuild on the build daemon. Everybody can ask for a rebuild request, but not sure it will be enought. The real fix is only on the hands of the buildd maintainers who are probably aware already of the issue, just maybe they do not know how important it is. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100920170413.ga7...@ekaia.org
Bug#585622: katepart automatically delete highlighted text
severity 585622 normal thanks On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:48:56PM +0800, Michael Tsang wrote: Package: kate Version: 4:4.4.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss 1 open a text/plain document in Konqueror 2 highlight some text in the embedded katepart 3 click on another tab 4 click on the tab with embedded katepart again expected result: the text is still highlighted actual result: the text is deleted without prior notice, resulting in data loss Hi! I can not reproduce this problem with kde 4.4.5 Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100812220901.ga18...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: What about...
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:00:20AM +0200, Marco Valli wrote: ... KDE SC 4.5.0 in Sid? regards http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/08/msg0.html Read after Current status. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100811000940.ga8...@ana.debian.net
Bug#591576: FTBFS in hppa
Package: eigen2 Version: 2.0.12-1 Severity: serious See log at: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=eigen2ver=2.0.14-1arch=hppastamp=1279087164file=log Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100804003809.ga13...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#590172: koffice-doc-html should conflict with old kpresenter data
Hi Mark! On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:41:51AM -0300, Mark Small wrote: Package: koffice-doc-html Version: 1:2.2.1-2 Severity: important Hi there, Today I installed the new version of koffice that just hit testing. I ran in to a small problem. koffice-doc-html wouldn't install until I uninstalled the old kpresenter data because they share a file. Perhaps there should be a conflicts? Thanks for your bug, could you please tell me a few more details: - from what koffice version are you updating from? - what is the conflicting file? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100729005242.ga9...@ana.debian.net
Bug#589673: koffice-l10n: no migrate yet
Package: koffice-l10n Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: serious Do not allow translation migrate before the app. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100719210940.ga23...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#589066: kformula: Errors in package description
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:02:54PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote: Package: kformula Severity: minor in DDTSS I see paragraphs more than once (note that from 3th paragraph you the 1st one and so on). The package description is: ---8-8-8-8-8-8-8-- KFormula contains the formula drawing components. It can be used to embed formulas into KOffice documents. . Features include easy Greek letter insertion, intelligent cursor movement, advanced syntax highlighting, multi-level undo support, LaTeX export and MathML import. . This package is part of the KDE Office Suite. KFormula is a formula editor that provides the basic input facilities and the support functionality expected of a KOffice application. . Features include easy Greek letter insertion, intelligent cursor movement, advanced syntax highlighting, multi-level undo support, LaTeX export and MathML import. . This package is part of the KDE Office Suite. ---8-8-8-8-8-8-8-- but I think it must be: ---8-8-8-8-8-8-8-- KFormula contains the formula drawing components. It can be used to embed formulas into KOffice documents. . Features include easy Greek letter insertion, intelligent cursor movement, advanced syntax highlighting, multi-level undo support, LaTeX export and MathML import. . This package is part of the KDE Office Suite. ---8-8-8-8-8-8-8-- Thanks Davide, effectively kformula only includes now the kformula shape, I forgot update the description! Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714172805.ga10...@ana.debian.net
[ANN] Koffice 2.2.1 in unstable
Hi everybody, KOffice 2.2.1 and its translations will be available from unstable in a few hours. The upload has been made for AMD64, it might take some hours more for others arches. Keep in mind the different level of maturity of the applications and remember: file upstream at https://bugs.kde.org/ and only file Debian bugs in the Debian BTS. When somethigs does not work as expected or you are unsure, use this user mailing list. Enjoy and btw ... ¡viva la roja! ;) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100712152232.ga25...@ana.debian.net
Bug#585136: kdebase-runtime: drkonqi reports bugs upstream, not following the Debian BTS policy
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:16:37PM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote: Hi all! I think there is a problem with reporting bugs with DrKonqi. DrKonqi fills bugs upstream, but the Debian policy is to fill bug using the Debian BTS. No, as user, you can file bugs in the Debian BTS, and you are encouraged to do this when it is a Debian problem (packaging, integration). However, when the bug is upstream it is usually a better idea submit the bug to upstream and follow up in whatever system upstream uses. As a side effect, we can see the bug count for DebianKde is falling (at least on the yearly graph (http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kdebuggraph.html). That is something we are very happy about. To get some brackground and understand why is making us happy, please read: http://ekaia.org/blog/2009/09/26/how-to-get-your-bugs-solved-in-debian-kde/ http://ekaia.org/blog/2010/02/16/no-the-debian-kde-post-you-were-waiting-for/ http://ekaia.org/blog/2010/05/05/kde-443-in-unstable/ I think either drkonqi or the documentation of BTS should be fixed. If you think there is any part of the BTS's documentation that says explicitly you must file bugs in the Debian BTS and not upstream, please let me know. I will file a bug against bugs.debian.orgwith a rewording suggestion. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100609143554.ga26...@ana.debian.net
Re: KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0400, kap4lin wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 i386 from the semi-official repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am currently inclined to do so. However, it is not yet fully decided and I would love some well argumented feedback. Take into consideration some apps are more mature than others. Out of curiosity, I installed koffice on a spare Virtualbox VM (Debian/sid - sidux). The VM itself is kept updated. Both kword and kspread crashed (repeatedly deterministically) when trying to open new blank document! Karbon, Krita, Kpresenter at least opened a blank document. In the case of crashes, install the package koffice-dbg to get a backtrace. Read more at: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reportss As I said, it was just out of curiosity. So, apologies! I do not use koffice and I don't see myself using it in foreseeable future. In fact, I don't see myself running squeeze either! So, I'll refrain from this :( Even if it gets included, I just hope there is a disclaimer, very easily visible to the end user [*,**], that kword, kspread (and may be kpresenter) are at best pre-alpha quality softwares! I understand that a lot of work has gone into krita (and karbon) so it is worth including koffice just for these. Sorry but I do not see the point of reporting here it crashes if you do not try to check what is the problem, it might have been very well a problem in *your* system or a problem that is easily fixable. kword, kspread open here a new document without problem, yes they crash from time to time but not when you open a blank new document. Also, you are using sidux, AFAIK it should not be very far from Debian unstable but that packages are for a pure Debian unstable instalation (FWIW, they also fine in my netbook with testing). Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100529183408.ga3...@ana.debian.net
Re: KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:08:52PM +0200, Xavier Brochard wrote: Krita and karbon are ready for end users, other apps not. Putting all the suite in Squeeze will expose you to a lot of bugs report! By not putting it, we will see a lot of complaints on this mailing list. The good thing is that every one can answer on this list. I can only stress here (no for you, to all the users): if you do not send the bug report to upstream adding all the information you can and being able to provide more information when asked, your posibilities of getting the bug report fixed are very low. If it is not too much work, I would suggest to put krita and karbon in Squeeze and the other packages in another repository when they will be usable. Then, you will add a line in koffice, karbon and krita packages description (looks like nobody read READMEs) explaining that. No going to happen. KOffice includes a bunch of program with very diferent public. I have interest in kspread, kword and kivio, but I don't draw (with or without computer) so my usage and interest in krita and karbon is only opening them before uploading new version of koffice to make sure they work :) Currently my opinion is the less mature apps are not in worse shape that the koffice 1.6 shipped in Lenny, while the more mature apps seems to be superior to those in Lenny. More information: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691 Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100528122431.ga7...@ana.debian.net
Re: KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption (mini-update)
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 i386 from the semi-official repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ You have now available also the localization packages [1], and also the small application based in koffice libraries braindump [2] Ana [1] You can see the list of languages at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/ [2] http://blog.cberger.net/2009/05/20/braindump/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100528204419.ga19...@ana.debian.net
Bug#580782: KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 i386 from the semi-official repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ These packages will arrive to the official archive soon, but since I need to get some time to update the copyright file and they include new debs (kformula shape and kexi), they need to go thru NEW queue and it might take a couple of weeks. It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am currently inclined to do so. However, it is not yet fully decided and I would love some well argumented feedback. Take into consideration some apps are more mature than others. Some notes and advise: - You have the instructions in how to use those repositories in the mentioned page, please follow them. - The packages are for KDE 4.4.3 - If you do not understand very well how to install packages from no official repositories and you do not want to break your system, do not use them. Reporting bugs -- These packages are not in the Debian archive so please *don't* report bugs against them in the Debian Bug Tracking System. If you see any packaging problem, please report it in this mailing list. If you find a bug, miss a feature or have a wishlist, please file a report in the KDE bugzilla: https://bugs.kde.org/ Include all the information you can about your system (Debian experimental, KOffice 2.2.0) and all the details you are able to give. If you just have a problem and you don't know exactly what it is, send an email to this list. In the case of crashes, install the package koffice-dbg to get a backtrace. Read more at: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reportss Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100526141400.ga4...@pryan.ekaia.org
KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 i386 from the semi-official repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ These packages will arrive to the official archive soon, but since I need to get some time to update the copyright file and they include new debs (kformula shape and kexi), they need to go thru NEW queue and it might take a couple of weeks. It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am currently inclined to do so. However, it is not yet fully decided and I would love some well argumented feedback. Take into consideration some apps are more mature than others. Some notes and advise: - You have the instructions in how to use those repositories in the mentioned page, please follow them. - The packages are for KDE 4.4.3 - If you do not understand very well how to install packages from no official repositories and you do not want to break your system, do not use them. Reporting bugs -- These packages are not in the Debian archive so please *don't* report bugs against them in the Debian Bug Tracking System. If you see any packaging problem, please report it in this mailing list. If you find a bug, miss a feature or have a wishlist, please file a report in the KDE bugzilla: https://bugs.kde.org/ Include all the information you can about your system (Debian experimental, KOffice 2.2.0) and all the details you are able to give. If you just have a problem and you don't know exactly what it is, send an email to this list. In the case of crashes, install the package koffice-dbg to get a backtrace. Read more at: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reportss Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100526141400.ga4...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#580782: Please set severity to important :/
Hi Yves, On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:41:03PM +0200, Yves Lambert wrote: Package: krita Version: 1:2.1.1-1 Severity: normal Hi, as libkdcraw7 is no longer in repository, krita cannot be installed anymore with or without KDE 4.3xx and therefore koffice can not be installed. This is formally an *important* bug. The bug has a severity higher than important, so not sure what you are asking here =) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100519185715.ga22...@ana.debian.net
Bug#580782: [krita] Can't install krita due to dependency issue with libkdcraw
Hi Matthew, On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:06:50PM +0100, Matthew Cope wrote: Package: krita Version: 1:2.1.1-1 Severity: serious Hello, After updating to KDE SC 4.4.3 krita will not install because it cannot install libkdcraw7. KDE SC 4.4.3 now uses libkdcraw8 instead of libkdcraw7. This appears to be similar to (already closed) bugs #579984, #579985 #579986. Yes, koffice needs a new upload to be instalable with KDE 4.3.4. Sadly for making a new upload, koffice neess also a copyright review that will take some time. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100512142003.ga19...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: issue with device notifier in kde4.4.3 (only in panel)
Hi Iker, First of all, the list for users question and talk is debian-...@l.d.o. About your question: On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 12:22:34AM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: Hello, I have this problem since you uploaded kde4.4 in qt-experimental-snapshots repository, but i wasn't sure if it was only a trouble with my system. I cannot unmount usb disks with the device notifier in the panel, because even the font size it is too big or it doesn't resize properly. When this plasmoid is in the desktop, although it is smaller than the text to show, The text stands out together with the button to unmount the device, but when it is on the panel this does not happen, making imposible to unmount it. I haven't found anything similar happening to anybody, but i think that there is not happening because of my configuration, y have purged and reinstaled kde and remove ~/.kde, tried to change fonts size (it seems that cannot change plasmoids font size) and i haven't changed the theme of kde. because i am not sure if can explain myself good enough i have taken two snapshots to explain the problem and published in esdebian.org. It is in spanish but the explanation is the same, just if some of you want to see the pictures: http://www.esdebian.org/foro/41145/notificador-dispositivos-kde44-demasiado-pequeno I am thinking that maybe is because the translation to spanish needs more space that the original text english, but i am just guessing. what should i have to do? report it as a bug? or request to kde developers as feature to avoid the text to stands out the plasmoid? You could file a request to make the window bigger automatically when the translation is too long, but I am not sure developers will agree with this (and I am not sure there is a shorter translation with full sense.) However, there is a bug if the button does not appear when you put your mouse over the hard drive you plugged so I suggest you report it all at http://bugs.kde.org Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100507225531.ga21...@ana.debian.net
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:12:31PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: My point is that many KDE developers and packagers do not use KDE like real-world users, and therefore do not appreciate the concerns of real-world KDE users. Of course no, they write KDE while they use GNOME /ironic Real-world users as such do not exist, developers write what they want to use, no what *you* want to use. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100507155605.ga9...@ana.debian.net
KDE in Debian, a personal POV
A couple of ideas that might not be very clear: Suggestions if you still want to use KDE 3.5 - keep using Lenny forever - learn how to build it, install it e.g. in /opt/kde and learn how to update it every time there is a new non-compatible library in your system - switch to another distribution that stills ships kde 3.5 (I think centos 5.0 still ships KDE 3.5.4) - pay/bribe somebody to make packages for you. Somebody will add here about some KDE 3.5 repositories that are out there, but those repositories are unlikely to be there forever. suggestions if you do not want to use KDE 4.4 -- - switch to another desktop like Gnome, XFCE, GNU STEP or LXDE - don't use any desktop - learn how to love KDE 4 ? :) suggestions if you are OK with KDE 4.4 but you have some issues --- Ask yourself what you can do to improve it. Understand developers working in a project do not have the same motivation or interest than you and they primarily write the software for them, not for you, just they share it and you can use it too (or improve it) You can ask them nicely to look at your stuff, and they can tell you nicely if they are not interested. Complain unfairly will only demotivate developers and will have the opposite effect of what you wanted. Some extra comments: If you think Debian (*) (not the Qt/KDE maintainers) should be acting different, make sure you agree with the Debian Social Contract and Constitution, start contributing to Debian until you become a person who has a track of contributions and then you can try converting Debian in what you think it should be. (*) mind debian is not an entity, it is a bunch of people with very different motivations. If you think you do not have the skills to contribute, you can try start learning, all the developers started as a mere users, sometimes because they did not like something!. If you do not have the time, that's life, you have to choose, I would love eating good vegetarians meals every day but I do not have the time to learn how to cook them every day or the money to pay for them, mostly because I choose to do other things on my time. Finally, a more personal opinion, that I hope will help to understand the point, in the case I would have not liked KDE 4 at all, I just would have switched to something else. It would have never cross my mind maintaining KDE 3, it would have required like 2 or 3 times the work currently it takes maintaining KDE 4, that is not exaclty little. Some people seem to believe we do not maintain KDE 3 just because we do not want and it would just be matter of keeping those packages there in a corner of the archive, it would be a titanic work maintaining such a piece of abandoned software. You would be underestimating if you think 2-3 persons could maintain KDE 3 on their own, when KDE 3 was actively maintained it had more than 200 developers, some paid to do so full time! Maybe you do not need so many people to maintain it just working, but there are small features you might want in the future, e.g support for HTML 5. How can 2-3 persons without deep knowledge of all the code expect to do that? Have a nice weekend, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100507193229.ga14...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote: Hello! First, thank you for the great distro that is Debian, one of the best. I would like to suggest you some way so that the users keep on using the good old KDE 3.5 when they migrate to the upcoming Lenny. Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to Kde4. No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it. I really feel sorry that KDE 3 series is no more being developed, and when the day cames that I no longer will be able to use KDE 3, I will switch to Apple or even Windows, but NEVER to kde4 or Gnome! (and I feel many users out there think like me!!!) You still have gnustep, xfce, lxde, no using any or simply never upgrade. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506065944.ga30...@ana.debian.net
Re: KDE 4.4.3 in unstable
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:13:50PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: These responses are quite frustrating. I read Ana's post as please make sure KDE 4.4 is ready for stable. My post was KDE 4.4 is inappropriate for stable. All the replies have been too bad, we are going to release it anyway. No, you complain about something *specific* no the whole KDE 4.4, as I told you, if you are able to develop a patch for it, there is plenty of time for testing before freeze. Understand no everybody is annoyed about that. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506071807.ga30...@ana.debian.net
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 07:41:23AM -0400, Curt Howland wrote: On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ana Guerrero was heard to say: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote: Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to Kde4. No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it. While the former is certainly true, the latter is demonstrably false. False? Who from the current maintainers have seen you showing interest in maintaining KDE 3.5? Please demostrate it :-) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506171315.ga7...@ana.debian.net
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 04:39:02PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Sune Vuorela: On 2010-05-06, Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote: On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ana Guerrero was heard to say: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote: Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to Kde4. No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it. While the former is certainly true, the latter is demonstrably false. Where is your code? I will repeat No one is interested in doing it. That does not seem to be entirely true as was mentioned elsewhere in this thread: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/ However this seems far away from the man-power behind KDE 3 until 3.5.10. To truly get forward with this one it appears to me that way more developers are needed. Who then would have less or no time to work on improving KDE 4. Doing stuff in your own is easy. Doing stuff coordinating with a whole distro, whithin ugly hacks and with a good ending quality, is not. BTW, I would rather advise people learn how to build their own packages before using and thus depending in this 3rd party repo, no only because security reasons, or because it is not built in the top of debian. This repo is not going to be there forever, for sure, sooner or later people maintaining it will get tired, and if you are planning to use KDE 3 forever... Just pointing about this to people mentioning this repo, nothing direclty to Martin here :) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506171818.gb7...@ana.debian.net
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:26:34PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote: On Thursday 06 May 2010 it was so written: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 07:41:23AM -0400, Curt Howland wrote: On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ana Guerrero was heard to say: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote: Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to Kde4. No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it. While the former is certainly true, the latter is demonstrably false. False? Yes, false. There are lots of people who are interested in having KDE3 continue, as opposed to being forced to upgrade to KDE4. Ok, you read me wrong: nobody is interested in working on it. Who from the current maintainers have seen you showing interest in maintaining KDE 3.5? Please demostrate it :-) I'll demonstrate, sure. there is nobody interested on it does not equal there is no developers interested in working on it. If you had stated from the current maintainers in the first place, I would not have taken your statement as inclusive of all people, and you would not have then assumed that I mean developers. That there are no interested developers to do the work involved is self evident, since it is not occurring. And since we said from the very beginning (more than 2 years) it was not going to happen. You have demostrated nothing here =) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506173047.ga7...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: I have great respect for Ana's work but even Ana is using Mutt. This has nothing to do with KDE 4 or kdepim, I have been using mutt for more than 6 years now... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506185806.ga9...@ana.debian.net
KDE 4.4.3 in unstable
Hi, Given no everybody reads planet Debian, here goes a copy of http://ekaia.org/blog/2010/05/05/kde-443-in-unstable/ Following Qt 4.6.2, uploaded a couple of weeks ago, KDE 4.4.3, has finally found its way to unstable in the last 48 hours. Given KDE 4.5.0 is not expected until August, it is likely the next point release, 4.4.4, will be the KDE version included in next Debian stable, Squeeze. What this means: go and update to 4.4.3, test, and when you find a bug, please, follow this instructions [0]. If you are lazy to read it: report upstream bugs at the KDE Bugzilla and report the packaging/integration bugs in the Debian BTS. When in doubt, you have the Debian KDE mailing list [1], that is being successful so far in maintaining a good signal-noise ratio. I would like highlight the drop in the open bugs in the BTS experimented in the last 2-3 months, I published this graph in February: http://ekaia.org/img-blog/2010/ALL_3years-February2009.png And look at the situation now: http://ekaia.org/img-blog/2010/ALL_3years-May2010.png This is mainly due to the great work of Eckhart Wörner. Also there is other people who contributed to it more modestly, a big thank you to all of you! As you can see in the second graph, there are less than 1000 bugs open now in the BTS, they are still too much and time has taught us it is very easy going over 1000 again, so we still welcome more volunteers looking at bugs. If you are not the bugsquasher type, you can write HTML and you do some IRC, we also need somebody to help us reorganize a bit the pkg-kde website[2]. I will help you personally on this task, but it is good if you can lurk by IRC and you are not scared to share your doubts with the rest of the team there. Finally, I promise I will publish something about the status of KOffice pre-2.2 in Debian, but I still can not say whether it will be in Squeeze. [0] http://ekaia.org/blog/2009/09/26/how-to-get-your-bugs-solved-in-debian-kde/ [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/ [2] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100505202449.ga26...@ana.debian.net
Re: KDE 4.4.3 in unstable
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:21:15PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: On Wednesday 05 May 2010 15:24:49 Ana Guerrero wrote: Following Qt 4.6.2, uploaded a couple of weeks ago, KDE 4.4.3, has finally found its way to unstable in the last 48 hours. Given KDE 4.5.0 is not expected until August, it is likely the next point release, 4.4.4, will be the KDE version included in next Debian stable, Squeeze. Please, please, don't do this. In 4.4, kmail depends on mysql-server in order to send mail. (kmail - Akonadi - mysql-server). In 4.3, this is not true. From what I hear on upstream mailing lists, this won't be true in 4.5. Upstream is already aware and working on the issue, but it falls under new feature so it won't be included in the 4.4.x line. For me, KDE 4.4 is the most broken KDE release since 4.1 (I didn't try 4.0). I'd rather have 4.3.x in Squeeze than 4.4. Actually, I like most of KDE 4.4 and am currently using it for day-to-day work. I'm still using kmail/kontact/etc. (basically kdepim) from 4.3 since I have no desire to run yet another RDBMS on my system. (I already run PostgreSQL, and have a number of apps that use SQLite installed.) Please don't force an Akonadi-enabled PIM suite on stable users before they are provided with an Akonadi that can use something other than MySQL. KDE 4.4 is the current stable release, there is not much more options here with the freeze happening around the summer *before* 4.5 is out. Good news is you have at least a couple of months to develop a patch for this. ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100505215835.ga28...@ana.debian.net
Re: broken url
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:05:55PM +0200, 3m4il wrote: Hi Guys The URL to the i386 Version of KDE-Debian ist broken (404). Page: http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kde3.html Link: http://caesar.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/4.0_r6/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r6-i386-kde-CD-1.iso bye That page was highly outdated. I have updated the links to mention Lenny now instead of etch :) Thanks! Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100425174351.ga8...@ana.debian.net
Re: Koffice plans for squeeze?
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:51:22AM -0500, Joe Neal wrote: Is Squeeze going to ship with any version of Koffice at all? I have papers and documents going back nearly ten years in koffice formats and I will need to retain access to them from time to time. If Squeeze dosen't ship with Koffice is it expected to make a showing in backports fairly soon after the release? Keeping a Lenny install in VirtualBox is not my preferred solution so I'd rather keep my stable workstation at Lenny until Koffice is available for Squeeze via backports if that will be an option. Whether KOffice2 will ship in Squeeze is still undefined. Koffice 2.0 and 2.1 were not really suitable for the final user. Currently KOffice 2.2.0 is in beta phase but there is not a date set for the final release. Once we have KDE 4.4 in unstable (and there is not a date for this) I will update KOffice in *experimental* to the latest (pre)release of 2.2.0. About using KOffice in your testing/unstable system, you can try using koffice2 from experimental. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100329172514.ga27...@ana.debian.net
Bug#571990: [libqt4-dev] Reopen bug closed without reason
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:55:30AM +0100, Robert Wohlrab wrote: reopen 571990 thanks Please don't close a bug who wants a upload to unstable with an upload to experimental. You bug can be understood as a request to upload to a new version, so do not take it so bad ;) Have you realized also your mail subject is kind of wrong? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100304173547.ga24...@ana.debian.net
Bug#572374: please consider Section: Education
Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, While trying to sort of the Section field for the apps included in kdeedu, I started to wonder if we are missing a subsection in the archive for educational applications. We have a lot of new applications in the archive that are not exactly games. Currently most of the applications are split between the subsections misc and games. E.g.: under games we have childsplay, tuxtype and under misc we have jclic, anki and most of the debian-edu metapackages. We also have several linguistic applications (no localization ones) that could fall under this category: apertium, kiten or parley. I am sure there are more educational apps hidden under other categories. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100303193448.ga2...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#561779: More info...
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: Does KDE offer a screenshot app btw? I couldn't locate one using APT... ksnapshot. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100226205645.ga30...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#560957: closed by Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
fixed 560957 4:4.3.1-1 thanks On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:51:44PM -0900, Florian Aldehoff wrote: Hi Lisandro, I disagree with closing this bug. As similar bug reports like https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdepim/+bug/158978 and https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140443 indicate, a rewrite of the dimap system in newer versions of kmail makes this bug in Kmail 1.9.9 unreproducible with KDE 4.2+. However the bug continues to exist in KDE 3.5.10 and makes Kmail unusable unless I have a second backup IMAP server to recover deleted messages. You switched the bug status to more information - what else do you need to know? The bug can be closed with a version (doing it now) marking it is fixed in 4:4.3.1-1. This will mark the bug fixed in unstable and for the next Debian stable release but it will continue appearing as open in stable (KDE 3.5.10) Apart from this bug I'm a happy user of 3.5 and not to eager to switch to KDE4 prior to the next Debian stable release - actually I consider staying with 3.5 even when Debian 6 is out. Any chance that the improvements in newer Kmail versions are backported to Kmail 1.9.9? I am afraid the answer is no. KDE 3 and KDE 4 are quite different and development of KDE 3 is dead now. The only KDE 3 bugs that will be fixed are those security bugs that a real threat. Ana Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2010 17:57:05 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the kmail package: #560957: kmail deleted contents of inbox with dimap It has been closed by Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com by replying to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100222083315.ga17...@ana.debian.net
Re: kde-minimal dependency problem (libxxf86misc1)
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:49:40AM +0100, Ramon Antonio Parada wrote: There is an installation problem KDE in unstable. Package libxxf86misc1 is present in unstable but only avr32 and m68k ports while other architectures (amd64, i386, etc) were moved to testing. [1] kde-minimal depends on kdebase-workspace, depends on kdebase-workspace-bin, depends on libxxf86misc1 which as I said is not avaliable in unstable for most architectures. Need to manually download packages if you wanna install kde. This is known and it will be fixed in the next KDE upload (4.4 whenever it will be). You do not need to download anything manually, just keep the testing lines in your sources.list. The library will be in testing as long as KDE 4.3.x is there needing it. As unstable user it is a good idea keeping always testing in your sources.list to avoid this kind of problems when transitions are going on. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100221020530.ga9...@ana.debian.net
Bug#561779: Markers for range selections not updated as necessary
Hi Marcos, On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:46:52PM +, Marcos Marado wrote: Upstream bug report at: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219842 Thanks for forwading the bug! Next time, could you please link in the debian BTS? You only need to send an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org with the following text: forwarded XXX http:/bugs.kde.org/ thanks e.g, for this case: fowarded 561779 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219842 thanks The Subject: of the email does not matter. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100218135618.gb29...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#561779: Bug fixed
reopen 561779 notfixed 561779 4:4.3.4-1 thanks On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:20:55PM +0200, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Package: kdepim Version: 4:4.3.4-1 The above bug about the kmail has been fixed in version 4:4.3.4-1 of the kdepim.Bug report is closing. After a quick chat with Antonis by IRC he told me he has tried to reproduce the bug several times with a new version (4:4.3.4-1) and the bug was not reproducible for it. Ulrich, you reported it against 4:4.3.2-1, could you check with this newer version? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100218135427.ga29...@pryan.ekaia.org
Bug#498903: krita: Can't import files with dcraw: non-numeric argument to -n
Hi Kurt, On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 03:05:19PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: found 498903 1:1.6.3-8 fixed 498903 1:2.1.1-1 thanks I think I never got your mail asking about this. The version in experimental seems to make use of libraw instead, so it's not giving that error. What kokeroulis meant is you have been asked about this bug from another triager, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498903#10 Is that an embedded copy of libraw? I don't see it in the archive. No, Krita from koffice 2 uses libkdcraw from kdegraphics. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100217104108.ga28...@ana.debian.net
Re: old debian kde version
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:54:42PM +0100, aiacovi...@libero.it wrote: Hi, is there any way to get old version of kde as packaged by Debian? Are .tar.gz , .diff.gz and .dsc files archived somewhere? Given what you want is the source package, you could fetch the kde tarballs from KDE's ftp (check the Attic dir [1]) and the debian/ directory from the packaging SVN [2]. [1] ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/Attic [2] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-kde (check the tags dir) HTH, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562388: soprano: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/soprano/libsoprano_raptorserializer.so': No such file or directory
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:35:38AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: soprano Version: 2.3.1+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091213 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 ... Fixed in SVN, it will be fixed in next release of soprano for KDE 4.4. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566120: kde-l10n: please provide kde-l10n-all
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:38:50PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Package: kde-l10n Severity: wishlist Hi, please add a kde-l10n-all metapackage depending on all kde-l10n-* packages. Maybe if you tell me why this would be a good idea... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566120: kde-l10n: please provide kde-l10n-all
tags 566120 wontfix thanks On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:40:13PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Ana Guerrero wrote: Maybe if you tell me why this would be a good idea... this is essential when building live cds (or here, dvds). Unless this is explained more, I do not see the point. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#504870: tags
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:36:50AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: tags 504870 + experimental thanks Hi Ana, # This package is not in sid/squeeze since months ago. will it come back from experimental? else I'd propose to close this bug... http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2009/12/msg00099.html I've tagged it sid+squeeze so it doesnt show up on http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/stable.html Maybe the tag experimental is not a good idea here and using versioned stuff is better, we can do 2 things: a) It is a removed package so close it as last version in unstable plus +rm b) Close it as fixed in experimental. In the unlikely case it is not, I will fix it in my next koffice upload due to this week. I like more b) but i think it still will confuse some scripts asummin the package is in unstable (so showing this problem affecting). Also you have tagged other packages in similar cases. I guess you were tagging after doko's bug updates, but he did not look carefully and there is ton of false positives (e.g. #565009) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Koffice in sid
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:31:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: On 2009-12-29 Jakub Nowacki wrote: Hello! Does anyone know when we can expect the new Koffice in Sid? Is it so buggy that it must be kept in experimental since November? :-) On 2009-08-07 Modestas Vainius wrote: It is not in Sid because it is not ready for Sid (software quality wise). There is no need to be scared of experimental. Answering here as main package of KOffice in Debian KOffice 2, as suite, is not fully ready for the masses, it is not only my personal impression, you can read the same in the KOffice 2.1 release announcement at [0] in bold: should still only be used by early adopters and probably not as the primary worktool. If squeeze were to be released tomorrow, it would be without KOffice. About whether KOffice 2.2 will be in unstable, it is to be decided when it is released. Also, it would help enormously getting co-maintainers (see [1]). That said, you can install it cleanly from experimental, then check if it is suitable for your needs. Very important: bug reports must go to upstream :) Ana [0] http://www.koffice.org/news/koffice-2-1-released/ [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: No xorg dependency for kde-minimal?
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 02:00:13AM +0100, Jesús M. Navarro wrote: Hi, Sune: On Sunday 22 November 2009 01:19:39 Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2009-11-21, Diederik de Haas didi.deb...@cknow.org wrote: Hello, I'm setting up a virtualbox image to do some testing and installed kde-minimal into it. After rebooting I didn't see KDE start up and executing 'startkde' produced the following msg: $DISPLAY is not set or cannot connect to the X server. Searching with aptitude revealed that no single xorg package was installed. While I realise that this is kde-minimal, but isn't this a bit too minimal (=useless)? (I know how to fix it, so no need to explain that) You can run kde from a remote machine... But it usually (while not always) will be run locally. Therefore it should suggest an X environment (not a hard dependency but yes a suggets). There is a Recommends already: a...@pryan:~$ apt-cache show kde-minimal Priority: optional Section: kde Installed-Size: 36 Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Architecture: all Source: meta-kde Version: 5:55 Depends: kdebase-runtime (= 4:4.3.1), kdebase-workspace (= 4:4.3.1), kdebase-apps (= 4:4.3.1) Recommends: kdm (= 4:4.3.1), xserver-xorg --- Suggests: kde-l10n (= 4:4.3.1) ... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: KDE Support in Debian
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:09:07AM +0800, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: My installation step is like this: 1. Download stable netinstall CD 2. Install stable using netinstall as minimal possible 3. Change /etc/apt/sources.list to point to testing 4. Aptitude update 5. Aptitude full-upgrade 6. Aptitude install kde-minimal I also would recommend this way to a new user, just one small comment: instead of kde-minimal, you can install kde-standard, that is kde-minimal plus some of the most common apps used. It is half-way between kde-minimal and kde-full. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552496: kwalletmanager: needs endless to open wallet and consumes up to 100% of one cpu
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:19:03AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:09:47PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Package: kwalletmanager Version: 4:4.3.2-1 Severity: important kwalletmanager needs around 10 minutes to open the wallet after startup and for this time one of my two cpu's consumes is fully busy with kwallet. As this makes kwallet pretty useless, this is in my eyes a important bug, and it would be cool to have it fixed. I ran into this once with KDE 3. Look if any (or all ) of your wallet files (under /home/user/.kde/share/apps/kwallet ), got corrupted or trunked to 0. You can create a new empty one and open/close it to test. If this is the case, i hope you have backups... oops, ovbiously yours did not get trunked because you can open it until wait some time. But the behaviour you tell is what happened to me when the file got trucked and basically it told me it was unable to open it after ~10-15 min with my system busy. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552496: kwalletmanager: needs endless to open wallet and consumes up to 100% of one cpu
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:09:47PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Package: kwalletmanager Version: 4:4.3.2-1 Severity: important kwalletmanager needs around 10 minutes to open the wallet after startup and for this time one of my two cpu's consumes is fully busy with kwallet. As this makes kwallet pretty useless, this is in my eyes a important bug, and it would be cool to have it fixed. I ran into this once with KDE 3. Look if any (or all ) of your wallet files (under /home/user/.kde/share/apps/kwallet ), got corrupted or trunked to 0. You can create a new empty one and open/close it to test. If this is the case, i hope you have backups... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548708: FTBFS with GCC 4.4: #elif is missing defined()
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:35:52AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: wv2 Version: 0.4.0.dfsg-1 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4 Tags: patch Fixed upstream already: http://wvware.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wvware/wv2-trunk/src/ustring.cpp?r1=2r2=36pathrev=36 So it will be in the next upstream release. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548229: ksnapshot has no man page
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:50:04PM -0400, Daniel Bolton wrote: Armin, I have attached a man page. Thanks, but could you provide an *useful* manpage? The manpage you have attached just shows the output of ksnapshot --help, if we thought this is useful we already would have added this automatically long time ago... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548229: ksnapshot has no man page
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:01:18PM +0200, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: [Ana Guerrero | Friday 25 September 2009] On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:50:04PM -0400, Daniel Bolton wrote: Armin, I have attached a man page. Thanks, but could you provide an *useful* manpage? The manpage you have attached just shows the output of ksnapshot --help, if we thought this is useful we already would have added this automatically long time ago... Could you define useful? I saw some manpages that basically state the --help output with one or two sentences above to explain what the tool is for. Yes, there is plenty of no useful manpages. That is not excuse to add more. About what is useful from my POV, if after reading a manpage you know something else about what you can do with the app. For example, look at ark manpage (sadly, outdated) it not only includes the relevant output of --help (it skip the generic options), it also includes examples of how to use the app, what to read to know more (see also paragprah), ark's maintainer, where to find more information about ark, a long description about ark... And it could include more stuff like where to report bugs... Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548229: ksnapshot has no man page
Hi Daniel, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:59:03PM -0400, Daniel Bolton wrote: Sorry for wasting your time. I think a simple man page should have been added a long time ago. Then I wouldn't have filed this report and wasted my time. The handbook entry ( http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdegraphics/ksnapshot/index.html ) pretty much gives the same info about invoking the program and then says to click the buttons. Nobody is wasting their time here. I do not know if you are subscribed to the bug, but I should have send you this more useful answer [1] firstly to you, sorry. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548229#37 On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:50:04PM -0400, Daniel Bolton wrote: Armin, I have attached a man page. Thanks, but could you provide an *useful* manpage? The manpage you have attached just shows the output of ksnapshot --help, if we thought this is useful we already would have added this automatically long time ago... Ana -- Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545392: Konqueror: Crashes on acid3 test
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:35:19PM +0200, Kai-Martin wrote: Package: konqueror Version: 4:4.2.4-1 Severity: normal konqueror crashes on acid3 test provided by http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid3 The crash occures in the middle of the test at number 42. (Makes me wonder if this is in any way related to the hitchhikers guide to the universe ...) Works here with 4.3.1, it does not pass the test, sadly :) Update and if you still have crashes, install the debugging packages to get a proper backtrace. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#544167: kde-l10n-sr: Wrong language mentioned in the package description
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:05:34PM +0200, Beatrice Torracca wrote: Package: kde-l10n-sr Severity: minor Hi. The package description mentions the Latvian language where it should say serbian Just a minor thing. Good catch! It will be fixed in the next upload. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: KDE plans for the squeeze cycle
Hi Marc et all, I will answer including also Qt 4 plans, that as you know is a quite important part of KDE 4 :) * Which major upstream releases of KDE are expected in the next two years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit flaky? About KDE -- We currently have KDE 4.3.0 in unstable. KDE 4.4 is expected about January 2010. KDE 4.5 is expected about July 2010. It is not a good idea to do more speculation about dates after this point because in KDE they are also testing new release management methods. About flaky releases, usually 0 point releases have some bugs and any further point releases are highly preferred to ship in a Debian stable release. In case of freezing with a .0 (or .1) release, we would like to be given the possibility of upload the next point releases given that point releases have so far contained fewer regressions than actual bug fixes. Having a .2 or .3 point release would be the ideal. We would like to mention that neither of us expected to release with KDE 4.3.X and we didn't give (nor will give now being late to the party) to it as much care as it probably needed to. About Qt - We currently have Qt 4.5.2 in the archive and the development and expectations are on Qt 4.6. This release is expected about the end of this year or worse case, very early 2010. Qt 4.6 will deliver an important set of new features (animation API, state machine framework), and important updates (graphics view, webkit, qtscript) [0]. Leaving 4.6 outside of the next stable, would put Squeeze in an unsupported status of new Qt software for its entire life span. It is also worth mentioning Qt 4.5.x doesn't support GCC 4.4 (and won't), Qt 4.6 will do. As with KDE the best is always shipping with a point release and Qt 4.6.1 is our minimal target. * How much time do you usually need from a new upstream release of KDE to a stable Debian package in unstable? KDE releases the tarballs to packagers one week before release, so packagers have time to prepare the packaging. We usually get something ready (with the 4.x releases) for release day, sometimes with some bugs, sometimes not. These bugs are usually weeded out during a week or two after this. For point releases, which is only bug fix releases, we usually get the packaging fully right at first upload, which happens around release day. * How many big transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier? We already have done most of the complicated stuff when moving from kde 3 to kde 4. We have some stuff we would like to do but nothing too big or must do before next release. If we could plan the Debian release cycle completely after what would be good for KDE, squeeze will freeze shortly after KDE 4.5.0 is uploaded to Debian (July 2010) and the 4.5.x point releases would be allowed in. KDE would have the possibility to take advantage of the new things in Qt4.6, and we would reach Qt4.6.2 or something like that on the Qt side. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
