Re: And uglier

2001-05-09 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I just replied your email with 'L' (lowercase), which had all the CC's and 
To's, and I only got the list address in the To: field. Are you sure you are 
using it right??? ;-)

I'm using KMail version 1.2.

One other thing. I have all my list mails organized in folders, with filters. 
On the folder, I specified that this was a list and added the address for the 
list. Maybe if you do this, it will work like it was supposed to.

(Right-click folder - Modify... - Associated mailing list)

When you right-click on the folder, there's even an option to post to the 
mailing list (which I usually do) :-)

HTH


On Wednesday 09 May 2001 10:14, JC Portlock wrote:
 Even so, the 'L' in kmail does not reply to just the list, but those
 listed in the 'To:' AND the 'Cc:' lines, similar to 'reply-all'.  That
 is how I responded to this message. [Sorry folks for doubling your mail
 input, just making a point  ;^)  ]

 On Tuesday 08 May 2001 07:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
  Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper
  case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action.
  What'd I miss?
 
  On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   On Tuesday,  8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote:
Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt.
This only replys to the particular list you are replying to...
  
   and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-)
  
   HS

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Public key: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6+WO8uvZ3Qj4o07kRAqsbAJ9ty3OjYZUSF77wR5a47F6L+HLwIACdGqKY
kg3TjD1Le2CvA7CzENhEhKs=
=k2TJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: scroll wheel

2001-05-07 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I've been using my mouse wheel in KDE 2.x, and I don't have imwheel 
installed. The only thing I needed was to configure XF86Config-4 to handle 
the mouse wheel:

Section InputDevice 
Identifier  Generic Mouse 
Driver  mouse 
Option  CorePointer 
Option  Device/dev/psaux 
Option  Protocol  ImPS/2 
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5 
EndSection

The two relevant options are the protocol, which most be compatible with the 
wheel, and the ZAxisMapping, which tells X to map the wheel. 

I have an intellimouse from MS, and I use the wheel as the middle button (so 
I don't have to emulate the third buuton)

Most KDE applications respond to the wheel (konqueror, kmail, konsole, etc.)

Hope this helps.

On Sunday 06 May 2001 17:29, James Smith wrote:
 Does anyone know of a way to get a scroll wheel on a mouse working in KDE
 without using an external program like imwheel?

 JW,
 James Smith

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Public key: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE69uIuuvZ3Qj4o07kRAuvjAJ9pbBdMZMbMo/VGTmx2ao1G/gtjCACZAWtQ
f7bK5Ak3NWeXPgFhm4lrAG8=
=5bdi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: Some ugly typewriter-fonts

2001-05-04 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Well, I don't know about Konqueror, but you can force KMail to use your 
encoding (in my case, iso-8859-1) and be able to read your mails. 

It is under Message/Set Encoding

That fixed the ugly fonts for me.

On Friday 04 May 2001 11:51, Jan Torben Heuer wrote:
 Don't know wheter it's an KDE Problem, but I have some Problems with an
 ugly Font under KDE. Every EMail coded as iso--2 is displayed with a
 very big bitmaps font. Some websites also contains this font. (e.g
 http://www.giga.de/home)

 Any idea, how i can delete this font or find out, which font ist is?

 thanx
   Jan Torben

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Public key: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE68tNnuvZ3Qj4o07kRAsGnAKCatD8UAehVkaZkCr/f3X9CQrcXWACeL3VL
hT0BPhoOKexM7bWoQ9ml/AU=
=uYU5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: libqt2-2.3.0-final-2 not compiled with -xft?

2001-04-18 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 18 April 2001 14:58, Jens Benecke wrote:

 Just FYI (I haven't followed all of this), in case you are wondering why AA
 fonts are not working and are using the NVIDIA drivers.

 NVIDIA drivers claim they can do RENDER, but they can NOT yet do AA fonts.
 They just have every app crash or ignore the settings. (At least here.)

 NVIDIA has promised improvements for the next driver version.

Well, that 'fixes' MY problem... =(

When you say next, could you be more specific? I'm using 0.9-796 right now...

Thx!

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Public key: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE63fxwuvZ3Qj4o07kRAnEYAKCBtUI8tmjCiT5HIze8Zh88QtKJVwCgmyz7
OEFLJ3gkJggKIPwkO2Y6hd0=
=2jC5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: libqt2-2.3.0-final-2 not compiled with -xft?

2001-04-17 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 17 April 2001 03:47, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
  I am having trouble getting the QT-AA to work with the latest packages. I
  haven't had any trouble with this in the past, and I followed the
  instructions in the task-anti-aliasing documentation. Still no QT-AA.
  xfs-tt is correctly configured, the RENDER extension is being loaded (as
  are the freetype and type1 modules), XftConfig is correctly
  configured (worked with 4.0.2), and QT_XFT=1. All my truetype fonts are
  available, but not smoothed.
 
  So I am left with one thing that I don't know how to check. Was libqt2
  compiled without -xft? That's the only thing left I can think of.

 yes..and as you can see it's linked to libXft and libXrender...

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/lib/libqt.so
 libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x404e)
 libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x404ee000)
 libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x405c9000)
 libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x405eb000)
 libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x405f4000)
 libXft.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 (0x4060b000)
 libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4062c000)
 libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x4063b000)
 libmng.so.1 = /usr/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x4065a000)
 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 = /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
 (0x40698000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x406de000)
 libXrender.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x407f1000)
 libfreetype.so.6 = /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x407f6000)
 liblcms.so.1 = /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x40829000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2000)

err... My libqt is NOT linked with libXrender nor libXft:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ldd libqt.so
libGLU.so.1 = /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 (0x404d5000)
libGL.so.1 = /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4054d000)
libXmu.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x4059)
libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x405a5000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x405b3000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4068f000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x406b1000)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x406ba000)
libfreetype.so.6 = /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x406d)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40708000)
libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40717000)
libmng.so.1 = /usr/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x40736000)
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 = /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 
(0x40774000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x407bb000)
libGLcore.so.1 = /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 (0x408ce000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40ad9000)
libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40add000)
liblcms.so.1 = /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x40b27000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2000)

I am using libqt2-gl package...

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Llave pública: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE63GV+uvZ3Qj4o07kRAmEJAJwPkWlO9Fssjb5rwDiRpZsX8ZR3dgCaApR7
ok5rfNzzr553Bv9MifLPu6s=
=y68Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: libqt2-2.3.0-final-2 not compiled with -xft?

2001-04-17 Thread Guillermo Castro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 17 April 2001 16:20, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
  err... My libqt is NOT linked with libXrender nor libXft:

 and what version of the libqt package are you running? -1 or -2?

 Ivan

- From dpkg:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l libqt2-gl
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: 
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  libqt2-gl  2.3.0-final-1  Qt GUI Library (Open GL Version).

So what does that mean? where do I get -2? I am using sid...

- -- 
Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eMonterrey  Monterrey NL, Mexico
Public key: 
http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE63LEMuvZ3Qj4o07kRArekAJ9FJwmMCvwaU1MkVzfgGtVb4m/PcACeK91c
3gAo7PAO427o7C1okAxwbnM=
=3QO3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: Konqueror and Secure pages

2001-04-05 Thread Guillermo Castro
Maybe you should try to install the kdebase-crypto package. I think with
that, you should be set...

Guillermo
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Garbett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: Konqueror and Secure pages


 I couldn't browse a secure website under Konqueror that I just installed
 2.1.1.
 The web site mentions on kde mentions needing an OpenSSL installed.

 Which Debian package should I grab for this? Where do I get it? I looked
 for such in the sid distro of Debian and couldn't find it.

 Shawn Garbett


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





KDevelop missing C++ reference

2001-03-20 Thread Guillermo Castro
Hi,

I have KDevelop 1.4 (kdevelop_1.4-final-0.potato1_i386.deb), but when I try 
to look at the C/C++ reference, it gives me an error. I've been trying to 
find a .deb package holding this reference and no luck.

Is anyone succesfully using KDevelop? With all the documentation created?

If you could share your insights on how and what packages you used, it would 
be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Guillermo Castro