Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-10-21 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2005, 01:03 -0400 schrieb j j:
> Where are the .debs?  Oo developers encouraged one to use alien to
> convert rpms to deb.  

Try/Test the pre packages

deb http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.x/ ./

on your sid box and report problems to the debian OOo mailinglist
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/

-- 
Noèl Köthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


kde 3.4 release and pre version

2005-03-19 Thread Noèl Köthe
Hello,

my i18n packages depends on 3.4.0-1 which isn't fullfilled right now.
The packages on alioth are versioned with preX. Will the 3.4 release go
to alioth in the next days or will it be faster (it needs some time for
building and uploading) to rebuild i18n?

Any plans to upload 3.4 to experimental?

thx.

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: Where do i get 3.4?

2005-03-17 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 10:44 +0100 schrieb NoÃl KÃthe:

> This is fixed in the 3.4 release and since yesterday I working on it

Uploading to http://people.debian.org/~noel/kde-i18n/
It will need some time to be there.
Feel free to upload it to alioth.

For an upload to sid (when we decide to upload 3.4) I will build them
again but because 3.4 is released and some people are crying;) I made
them available fast.;)

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: Where do i get 3.4?

2005-03-17 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Mittwoch, den 16.03.2005, 23:05 +0300 schrieb Alex. V. Bogdanov:

> debian repository? Also, I haven't found i18n packages :\

This is correct because pre1 i18n had some problems when building.
This is fixed in the 3.4 release and since yesterday I working on it
(add/remove languages, add new files to the packages)

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: kde-i18n-de and old kdevelop

2004-05-01 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sa, den 01.05.2004 schrieb Hendrik Sattler um 13:22:

> why does the following situation exist?
> # aptitude -V install kde-i18n-de
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree
> Reading extended state information... Done
> The following packages will be automatically REMOVED:
>   kdevelop [4:2.1.5.1-7] kdevelop-data [4:2.1.5.1-7]
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>   kdevelop [4:2.1.5.1-7] kdevelop-data [4:2.1.5.1-7]
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   kde-i18n-de [4:3.1.5-1 -> 4:3.2.2-2]
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 14,0MB of archives. After unpacking 3097kB will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
> Abort.
> 
> I know that there is a kdevelop3 in Debian unstable but kde-i18n-de is in 
> Debian Sarge and breaks kdevelop there.
> Additionally, if kdevelop3 is a full replacement for kdevelop2, why do both 
> versions exist in Debian? It only confuses users and is uninstallable for 
> non-english users (that also run KDE), anyway.

Its because the language files from kdevelop3 where added to kde-i18n
from upstream and they are conflicting with the files in kdevelop2.
kdevelop2 maintainer removed the i18n files and I will remove the
conflict in the next upload.

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: KDE 3.2.2 for woody?

2004-04-18 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Fr, den 16.04.2004 schrieb Ian Eure um 22:17:
> Does anyone have a source for this? 3.2.0 is the latest I've been able to 
> find.

afaik:
3.2.2 will be released tomorrow and on the kde.org server woody binary
packages will be available, too.

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: KDE 3.1.3 - Sid Status Update

2003-08-05 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Die, 2003-08-05 um 00.06 schrieb Chris Cheney:

> kde-i18n
> 
> 3.1.3 not uploaded yet by Noel Koethe

Sorry.:(
Have to wait for #203059

-- 
Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org




Re: kde-i18n-*-snapshot

2003-07-14 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Mon, 2003-07-14 um 02.29 schrieb Szymon Janc:

> I'm member of team that is translating kde to polish language.
> But we usualy don't have 100% messages translated when cvs-head is tagged and 
> released and we commit translations all the time. So I have to download cvs 
> and overwrite files from kde-i18n-pl deb to see if translations don't have 
> bugs, misspeling etc . It would be much more simple if there were snapshot of 
> it in debian :)
> 
> This would be easier not only for translators (probably all translation teams 
> have the same problem as polish team:)) but also users who would update 
> translations more often and have more and better translations then ones from 
> the official release :)
> 
> So I asking if it is posible to add packages like kde-i18n-*-cvs or sth ?
> Updated each week or fortnight ?

No.
kde-i18n is a huge package and the primary reason for testing and
unstable is to produce the next stable release. For these stable
releases -cvs or -snapshot package doesn't make any sense.

I think you should use the non-official KDE-cvs Debian packages from
this URL:

http://opendoorsoftware.com/cgi/http.pl?p=kdecvs;frame=1 

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: DSA-293-1, DSA-284-1

2003-04-26 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sam, 2003-04-26 um 06.21 schrieb Chris Cheney:

> >   For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem will be
> >   fixed soon.
> > 
> > What exactly is "soon", and what is holding this back? A fix has been
> > available for ages now.
> > 
> > Yes, yes, yes I know that people are doing this on their spare time 
> > (thanks!)
> > and that this is what comes from running unstable.. 
> > 
> > All I'm asking is at least a comment on the issue - are we waiting for
> > GCC 5.7 and XFree 8.5 to hit unstable along with Kernel 2.8.21 or only
> > until the first KMail worm declares "Kindly open the attached PDF file"?

> Anyone with the ability to upload a fixed version to sid feel free to do
> so.  I have approximately 3 weeks left before I graduate from uni so am
> quite busy. Otherwise expect it to be in sid around May 19.

Shouldn't we change from the one-maintainer-who-is
doing-the-whole-kde-core-stuff to a small team like other successfull
big packages (openoffice, gcc, libc,...)?

-- 
NoÃl KÃthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org