Re: Re: State of KDE 4.11

2013-09-25 Thread Robin Herink

So when is 4.11 getting to Debian repos? :)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52434cde.4050...@yahoo.com



Re: Font anti-aliasing looking weird in Firefox?

2013-09-25 Thread Robin Herink
I experience exactly the same thing. It must have nothing to do with KDE 
though, because I use MATE environment. I'd love to find out what it is 
though.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52434c74.6010...@yahoo.com



Re: Packaging very large i18n material

2003-06-09 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Lundi 9 Juin 2003 15:25, Ben Burton a écrit :
> Ah, okay, I wasn't entirely clear on the kde-i18n-lang option.  What I
> meant by this is that kde-i18n-lang would be updated for both KDE and
> KOffice releases, and would include code taken from both branches as
> appropriate.  e.g., when KOffice 1.3 is released, even though KDE 3.1.2
> stays the same, a new upload of kde-i18n is made with new koffice
> translations.

So, if you put all kde translations in kde-i18n-**, you will have to do this 
with the others kde apps which have a different release cycle.

For example : a new version of k3b is released. You have to take the new 
k3b.po and re-upload kde-i18n.

If I want to upgrade k3b, I have to download i18n-xy just for k3b.po

And the users would have to always keep the last stable version of every kde 
apps they want.

And what if I want to keep an old koffice with the last kde ?

Option 3 is very not modular... I also vote for option 2.

> This is of course a mess to sort out since the apps are on different
> release cycles.  That is the big problem with option 3.
>
> b. :)




Re: KDE, Writing CD's, and Windows XP

2003-05-31 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Samedi 31 Mai 2003 22:27, Robert Tilley a écrit :

> Any comment or information on the ideas contained herein is most
> appreciated.

For KaZaA : if you have high bandwidth, try lmule/xmule.
If you really need kazaa, try this :

http://p2pfr.free.fr/linux/fasttrack/kza.linux.tar.gz

It use VERY OLD libs (like ncurses4 :-/ ), but you will find them in the 
debian pool. Be careful to potential security issues.




Re: Is kscd usable? (kdemultimedia 3.1 on ppc)

2003-03-13 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Jeudi 13 Mars 2003 21:19, Chris Cheney a écrit :
> Something I forgot to mention earlier is that PC optical disks have had
> spdif connectors on them for several years now. So even if you are an
> audiophile using a cable (a spdif one) would still result in good quality.

On recent PCs, on-the-fly ripping (1x) does not take so much cpu time.
The analog cable was useful for 486, but I really think that it is outdated 
now (maybe for some old drives that can't extract audio digitally).

The problem is that the current linux kernel is unable to use DMA for audio 
ripping (related to the sector size) on IDE drives. And without DMA, the cpu 
load is high... Something like playing a dvd video vithout overlay...





Re: Bug#181009: ITP: koffice-i18n -- i18n files for koffice

2003-02-15 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Samedi 15 Février 2003 14:04, Ben Burton a écrit :
> If koffice-i18n is packaged as lots of little language-specific
> packages, it means we have lots more little packages in debian that add
> to the already confusing number of packages for users to choose from and
> for slow hardware to deal with.  It's not like just adding another two
> or three packages, I believe it's more like adding another 30.

Is this really a problem ?



For extragear, where each app has its own release cycle, upstreams asks 
packagers to include i18n stuff with the application. OK, it's what we are 
doing.
But what is the difference between any extragear app and koffice ?
The only one that I can see is the size : koffice is much bigger, so including 
the whole i18n stuff in one package would make a too big package (as Ben 
said).

Now, imagine that an extragear app become quite big, with big i18n stuff : we 
will have the same problem that with koffice now.
If we now put koffice i18n stuff in the kde i18n-foo packages (which is quite 
a hack, since we merge several branches), what will we do for this extragear 
app ? Will we put its i18n stuff in the kde i18n packages too ?

This would be quite hard for i18n maintainers : take kde from KDE_x_y_BRANCH, 
koffice from KOFFICE_x_y_BRANCH, and some extragear apps (but not the whole 
module) from HEAD ?




Re: Bug#181009: ITP: koffice-i18n -- i18n files for koffice

2003-02-15 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Samedi 15 Février 2003 14:04, Ben Burton a écrit :
> If, however, we (the developers) can go to the extra hassle of combining
> the koffice and core KDE i18n files

I suppose you mean the maintainer(s)...
So they would have to remove the koffice i18n files in KDE_x_y_BRANCH (I still 
don't understand why some koffice i18n is tagged in this branch) and use the 
ones in KOFFICE_x_y_BRANCH.

But what about the version number ?

If we use the one of the last KDE release, how to know which version of 
koffice is translated in ?




Re: kdeextragear-1 not in i18n

2003-02-03 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Lundi 3 Février 2003 21:41, Henning Moll a écrit :
> The last official release of k3b is 0.7.5 (www.k3b.org) (and yes, you're
> right, it contains the translations). But why do you use cvs HEAD for your
> packages then?

You raised an issue, but it appears that nobody knows the answer.
When a kde branch is created (like the current 3.1 branch), all the i18n 
contents are tagged, even kdenonbeta, kdeextragear and koffice, which should 
not.

As Charles said previously, it is quite confusing, because these modules 
shouldn't be translated in this branch. So, if you use it, you will get no / 
a strange translation, since no body care of it.




Re: Ralf's sid packages : only default font is available

2003-01-22 Thread Matthieu Robin
Le Wednesday 22 January 2003 22:51, vous avez écrit :
> You are using fontconfig on unstable. That is the root cause of the
> problem. My boss has had the same and I told him to install woody and
> XFree4.2.1 for woody + my packages to have a stable system that allows you
> to work and not play with unstable packages all day :-)).

I don't understand why, but after an apt-get install frozen-bubble it works 
:-)

Very strange, because I have made others apt-get between your packages and 
this one, and THIS one helped.




Ralf's sid packages : only default font is available

2003-01-22 Thread Matthieu Robin
Hi everybody !

I just switched to Ralf's 3.1 packages (sid). They are working perfectly, 
except that only the default (fixed) font is available. In fact, I can choose 
the font I want (the full lists appears), but whatever the one I select, the 
default one is always printing.

It is not related to XF, since my old home-made packages can still display 
every fonts without problem.

If it can help, I found this in my ~/.xsession-errors :

Fontconfig error: Cannot load default config file


Does anybody know where this problem comes from ?

Thanks a lot,




unsubscribe

2002-07-11 Thread Robin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]