Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
Rogerio Brito wrote: > I'm really not using GNOME anymore. In fact, I'm only using > Ximian Gnome packages like gnapster and gimp1.2, not much > else (and I expect testing to have upgraded versions of > gnapster and gimp1.2 RSN). Try out lopster (http://lopster.sourceforge.net/) and you will forget gnapster as well :). > The only drawback with Konqueror 2.1 Beta 2 right now seems to > be some missing pictures here and there, but nothing that is a Pictures problem is known and it's fixed already in CVS. > showstopper. Of course, I hope these bugs will be ironed out > soon and the final release will kick major butt. regards, -- Hasso Tepper KDE Estonian Team
Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
On Jan 28 2001, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > Am Saturday 27 January 2001 20:50 schrieb John Dalbec: > > I have KDE 2.0.1 on Potato. > > Both render perfectly fine with Konqueror 2.1 Beta 2. Thanks to all the reports that I have received, I installed Ivan's packages of Beta 2, and I'm amazed at how much things evolved since the 2.0.x times. It's much more configurable and much more comfortable to work with. Kudos to the KDE team, indeed. I'm really not using GNOME anymore. In fact, I'm only using Ximian Gnome packages like gnapster and gimp1.2, not much else (and I expect testing to have upgraded versions of gnapster and gimp1.2 RSN). The only drawback with Konqueror 2.1 Beta 2 right now seems to be some missing pictures here and there, but nothing that is a showstopper. Of course, I hope these bugs will be ironed out soon and the final release will kick major butt. []s, Roger... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
Am Saturday 27 January 2001 20:50 schrieb John Dalbec: > On Saturday January 27 2001 01:08 am, Rogerio Brito wrote: > > Here are two: > > > > http://oglobo.globo.com/especial/default_190101.htm > > > > http://www.conectel.com.br > > I get an empty frame with a blue background (comp_hp.htm) overlaying > everything. > > I have KDE 2.0.1 on Potato. Both render perfectly fine with Konqueror 2.1 Beta 2. -- WfG, Chris
Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
On Saturday January 27 2001 01:08 am, Rogerio Brito wrote: > Here are two: > > http://oglobo.globo.com/especial/default_190101.htm I get a SIGSEGV: 0x40ba0d19 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x40ba0d19 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x40bfbcd8 in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x4048c010 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #3 0x40b42858 in sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x410ddf7f in KHTMLParser::insertNode () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #5 0x410dddf2 in KHTMLParser::parseToken () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #6 0x410e7267 in HTMLTokenizer::processToken () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #7 0x410e5f59 in HTMLTokenizer::parseTag () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #8 0x410e6bc2 in HTMLTokenizer::write () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #9 0x410f00ac in DOM::HTMLDocumentImpl::write () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #10 0x41086266 in KHTMLPart::write () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #11 0x41084b3c in KHTMLPart::slotData () from /usr/lib/libkhtml.so.3 #12 0x401a5a7b in KIO::TransferJob::data () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #13 0x4018e953 in KIO::TransferJob::slotData () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #14 0x4018b1ff in KIO::SlaveInterface::data () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #15 0x40187e64 in KIO::SlaveInterface::dispatch () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #16 0x40187bf0 in KIO::SlaveInterface::dispatch () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #17 0x401ade64 in KIO::Slave::gotInput () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 #18 0x406b134e in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #19 0x406ff4f8 in QSocketNotifier::activated () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #20 0x406e0c4c in QSocketNotifier::event () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #21 0x4066250b in QApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #22 0x40440db4 in KApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #23 0x406327ba in qt_set_socket_handler () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #24 0x40632efb in QApplication::processNextEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #25 0x406641c0 in QApplication::enter_loop () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #26 0x40632827 in QApplication::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 #27 0x40e3c056 in main () from /usr/lib/konqueror.so #28 0x804a85c in strcpy () #29 0x804b0ba in strcpy () #30 0x804b425 in strcpy () #31 0x804c39e in strcpy () #32 0x40b3ca42 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > http://www.conectel.com.br I get an empty frame with a blue background (comp_hp.htm) overlaying everything. I have KDE 2.0.1 on Potato.
Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
> * Second, I think that your decision to compile the packages > with debug symbols enabled while everything is still beta is well this will come and go...my local copies will most likely have debugging 99% of the time, but the public ones I make will swap back and forth...Debug slows things down quite a bit...it's just as easy for me to kick out a debug'd binary for someone to use when troubleshooting (or me recreating it)... > * Third, when will the 2.1beta2 be officially released? I just > went to kde.org site and saw that nothing was officially > announced. BTW, do you happen to know if there is an > official schedule? Good question. I dont' remember the time line..there is one somewhere. ummm.. http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-2.1-release-plan.html so Monday. > I have some URLs here that cause Konqueror to not work > correctly (or that cause plain SIGSEVs). Would other people be > willing to test them? > > Here are two: > > http://oglobo.globo.com/especial/default_190101.htm > http://www.conectel.com.br Both of these work with what I"m using...which is post beta2. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: 2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
> I have some URLs here that cause Konqueror to not work > correctly (or that cause plain SIGSEVs). Would other people be > willing to test them? > > Here are two: > > http://oglobo.globo.com/especial/default_190101.htm > http://www.conectel.com.br both are working fine for me !! (debian/sid kde2.1-beta2 ) > > (A workaround for using the later page is to load: > http://www.conectel.com.br/hp.htm). works also -- Christophe Prud'homme | MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243| Un prud'homme était un homme Cambridge MA 02139 | d'honneur et de valeur, Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229 | sage et loyal. Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559 | -- Chateaubriand http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | Following the hacker spirit
2.1beta2, debugging and Konqueror (was: Re: 2.1beta2 warning)
Hi, Ivan. Hi fellow community members. I have some comments. * First of all, thank you, Ivan, for your impressive job maintaining all the packages. It is very much appreciated; * Second, I think that your decision to compile the packages with debug symbols enabled while everything is still beta is a welcome change. After all, if we are willing to help beta test software, we should have the symbols to send dumps to the KDE team. There were numerous times when I found homepages that I could not use with the 2.0.1 Konqueror (since it had a segfault) and I'm willing to test these very same pages with the 2.1 Konqueror (I'll install it as soon as I download it) so that I can let the KDE team know about it, so the community can have a more stable product. After all, Konqueror is the main reason why I and a few friends are using KDE in the first place; * Third, when will the 2.1beta2 be officially released? I just went to kde.org site and saw that nothing was officially announced. BTW, do you happen to know if there is an official schedule? I have some URLs here that cause Konqueror to not work correctly (or that cause plain SIGSEVs). Would other people be willing to test them? Here are two: http://oglobo.globo.com/especial/default_190101.htm http://www.conectel.com.br (A workaround for using the later page is to load: http://www.conectel.com.br/hp.htm). Comments are welcome. []s, Roger... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
