Re: And uglier
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 07:52:50PM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. What'd I miss? I am not sure that he meant kmail uses L to do this ...Mutt does this with the L, I do not know about kmail... -- Viktor ...-snip-... On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... ...-snip-... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-)
Re: And uglier
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 04:52, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. What'd I miss? You should read keyboard accelerators like 'L' as Press the key labeled 'L' and not as press the key kombination that produces an 'L'. E.g., Caps Lock ... L and L work but Shift+L does not (that can be a different accelerator, e.g. F1-Help Shift+F1-What's this. Achim On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) HS -- Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls/TELE: USA-707-442-6579\/A GNU-Debian linux user Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls ICQ: 12741145 If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid. SHOUT JUST FOR FUN. Free software, in a free world, for a free spirit. Please Support freedom! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: And uglier
Even so, the 'L' in kmail does not reply to just the list, but those listed in the 'To:' AND the 'Cc:' lines, similar to 'reply-all'. That is how I responded to this message. [Sorry folks for doubling your mail input, just making a point ;^) ] On Tuesday 08 May 2001 07:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. What'd I miss? On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) HS -- 73, JC Portlock KE6UME [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 14481033 === Professionals built the Titanic, but Amateurs built the Ark. === Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
Re: And uglier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just replied your email with 'L' (lowercase), which had all the CC's and To's, and I only got the list address in the To: field. Are you sure you are using it right??? ;-) I'm using KMail version 1.2. One other thing. I have all my list mails organized in folders, with filters. On the folder, I specified that this was a list and added the address for the list. Maybe if you do this, it will work like it was supposed to. (Right-click folder - Modify... - Associated mailing list) When you right-click on the folder, there's even an option to post to the mailing list (which I usually do) :-) HTH On Wednesday 09 May 2001 10:14, JC Portlock wrote: Even so, the 'L' in kmail does not reply to just the list, but those listed in the 'To:' AND the 'Cc:' lines, similar to 'reply-all'. That is how I responded to this message. [Sorry folks for doubling your mail input, just making a point ;^) ] On Tuesday 08 May 2001 07:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. What'd I miss? On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) HS - -- Guillermo Castro[EMAIL PROTECTED] eMonterrey Monterrey NL, Mexico Public key: http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x3E28D3B9 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6+WO8uvZ3Qj4o07kRAqsbAJ9ty3OjYZUSF77wR5a47F6L+HLwIACdGqKY kg3TjD1Le2CvA7CzENhEhKs= =k2TJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: And uglier
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:12:19AM -0300, Rogerio Brito wrote: I had this happen to me in a distant past. Perhaps my solution also applies to your case? It was to just reinstall xfonts-base (apt-get --reinstall install xfonts-base). Cross your fingers. Hope this helps, Roger... Thanks, that might have done it, but meanwhile I was pissed enough to reinstall with Progeny, which does a perfect job setting up X without even asking about hardware - but unfortunately it comes up in Gnome and they only have KDE 2.0. Nothing against Gnome, just not what I'm after. So the next experiment is whether the unofficial Potato KDE 2.1.1 will install on Progeny nicely Am I having fun yet?? Whit
Re: And uglier
Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... Just my $0.02...:-)) Viktor Ui. Még sohasem használtam ezt a két centes dolgot, de gondoltam most itt az idõ...:-)) On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:50:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...-snip-... Ps.: why isn't the 'reply-to' field of this list set to the list-address? Now I cannot simply 'reply' to messages, I must always do 'reply to all' (which isn't a Good Thing (tm), because the original sender receives two times my big and boring mail :) )
Re: And uglier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) HS -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6+IdHzvr6q9zCwcERAux5AKCvfi45/BudbwduHnShumQCjKZAXgCdFi4V A0XxrQOEnQXk/dVhPf9D4xk= =n+B3 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: And uglier
Er, maybe it can't. The caption under Message indicates an upper case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. What'd I miss? On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: Ákos, why don't you use the L (list reply) feature of mutt. This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) HS -- Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls/TELE: USA-707-442-6579\/A GNU-Debian linux user Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls ICQ: 12741145 If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid. SHOUT JUST FOR FUN. Free software, in a free world, for a free spirit. Please Support freedom!
It's getting even uglier
Okay, so I try to install kde2 onto Potato by dselect, select everything to do with kde, it appears to install (except for some reason libssh096 is currently not available on non-us), but startx kde2 does not do more than start an X screen with a single terminal in the corner and some unstable cursor control. If someone can suggest how to overcome this, it would save me from the wrath of my girlfriend, whose system is disabled because of this (she wanted Konqueror). The last couple of Potato-KDE2 installs I did went so damn smoothly Whit
And uglier
Since Potato wasn't happy on the target system, what the hey, went to upgrade it to Woody and xfree4. Make the change in sources, run apt-get, only gets half-way there, run dselect, not much better, run dselect and get fvwm, suddenly it decides it's really going to upgrade a bunch of stuff. It was after that I added xfree4, which seems to go okay, but now there's not even startx on the system. Okay, found and installed the package with startx, now it chokes because it can't find the 'fixed' font. And anXious just exits quickly ... eh, where are the alternatives to get X actually configured here? I like Debian based on other experiences, but this should not be such a bear, just getting a working install on a reasonably standard system that took Mandrake just fine a year ago (despite which I've no fondness for Mandrake - it was just a way to test and learn what was wrong with it). Can someone recommend a clear route to get Woody up with xfree4 and kde2? I can't waste another day on this, but would be happy to wipe and spend another couple of hours on it if I thought that would result in the system being up and clean. Thanks, Whit
Re: And uglier
On May 07 2001, Whit Blauvelt wrote: Okay, found and installed the package with startx, now it chokes because it can't find the 'fixed' font. And anXious just exits quickly ... eh, where are the alternatives to get X actually configured here? I had this happen to me in a distant past. Perhaps my solution also applies to your case? It was to just reinstall xfonts-base (apt-get --reinstall install xfonts-base). Cross your fingers. Hope this helps, Roger... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
