Re: Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:24:07PM -0500, David P James wrote: On Mon 20 December 2004 23:06, Antiphon wrote: I have KMail set up to use Bogofilter to preprocess messages but it doesn't seem to do anything any more. Did you recently upgrade Bogofilter (in Sid)? Because if so then you'll have to change the filter in KMail. Instead of filtering on the X-Bogosity header containing 'Yes' you now have to have it filter on matching the regexp 'spam\b' (if you just change 'yes' to 'spam' you'll send everything to the spam bin since the word spamicity which is always in the X-Bogosity header contains the string spam, which is why 'contains' has to be changed to 'matches regexp'). BTW: is it normal that the new version produces a lot of strange files in the directory, e.g.: 16384 2004-12-18 10:21 __db.001 2629632 2004-12-18 10:21 __db.002 98304 2004-12-18 10:21 __db.003 4063232 2004-12-18 10:21 __db.004 16384 2004-12-18 10:21 __db.005 0 2004-12-18 10:21 lockfile-d 1024 2004-12-21 10:22 lockfile-p 10485760 2004-12-18 10:23 log.01 10485760 2004-12-18 10:27 log.02 10485760 2004-12-18 10:27 log.03 10485760 2004-12-18 10:28 log.04 10485760 2004-12-18 10:29 log.05 10485760 2004-12-19 09:55 log.06 10485760 2004-12-21 09:41 log.07 10485760 2004-12-21 10:22 log.08 sums up to 90 MB. Quite a lot for my old system. :-( --
Re: Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
Hello Joerg, hello list! On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:39:19AM +0100, Joerg Rieger wrote: BTW: is it normal that the new version produces a lot of strange files in the directory, e.g.: [...] sums up to 90 MB. Quite a lot for my old system. :-( bogofilter: massive disk space leak http://bugs.debian.org/284452 The maintainer is still waiting for upstream to make the removal of the old log files a config option. Cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
Joerg Rieger wrote: BTW: is it normal that the new version produces a lot of strange files in the directory, e.g.: I read on the bogofilter list, that the latest version is really buggy. I am on testing, so this does not happen to me, but if I were you, I would get bogofilter on hold to the previous version (= in aptitude) and wait until the new upstream version will come out. Second. The different values of X-Bogosity header in filtered messages can be changed back to the original values in ~/.bogofilter.conf (or whatever current name of the bogofilter configuration files is -- it is also customizable in /etc/bogofilter.conf). Matej -- Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 understand, v.: To reach a point, in your investigation of some subject, at which you cease to examine what is really present, and operate on the basis of your own internal model instead.
Re: Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
* Matej Cepl [Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:50:37 -0500]: bogofilter on hold to the previous version (= in aptitude) and wait until the new upstream version will come out. aptitude forbid-version is nice. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 You've come to the right place. At debian-devel we are always willing to argue over the meanings of words. -- seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
I have KMail set up to use Bogofilter to preprocess messages but it doesn't seem to do anything any more. Spamassasin works but is terribly slow. Annoyance Filter refuses to be detected in the anti-spam wizard, even if it is installed via apt-get I tried deleting the bogofilter settings and the KMail filters for it but it seems to have no effect.
Re: Bogofilter no longer works in KMail
On Mon 20 December 2004 23:06, Antiphon wrote: I have KMail set up to use Bogofilter to preprocess messages but it doesn't seem to do anything any more. Did you recently upgrade Bogofilter (in Sid)? Because if so then you'll have to change the filter in KMail. Instead of filtering on the X-Bogosity header containing 'Yes' you now have to have it filter on matching the regexp 'spam\b' (if you just change 'yes' to 'spam' you'll send everything to the spam bin since the word spamicity which is always in the X-Bogosity header contains the string spam, which is why 'contains' has to be changed to 'matches regexp'). HTH, -- David P James Ottawa, Ontario http://david.jamesnet.ca ICQ: #42891899, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Noone isn't no one pgpKIt9oqIIr6.pgp Description: PGP signature