Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:43 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: > [...] > > Those are: > > kdeedu-* > > libkdeedu* > > and the KDE meta packages. > > > > The meta packages are probably only changed if a dependency changed. > > > > kdeedu cause is described at > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kdeedu > > An updated kdeedu needs to be pushed into testing but held back due to a > > chain of dependencies (looks like qt-x11-free is the cause). > > Ah, thanks! > > > Any other packages? > > Probably not. > > > HS > > Wolfgang By the way, how big are the chances that a current KDevelop will make it into the sarge stable release? Wolfgang
Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: > Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 11:40 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > > Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein: > > > On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a > > > > mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing? > > > > > > Haven't seen any KDE 3.1 stuff in Sarge (but I'm not using the whole > > > KDE system so maybe...) > > > > If you go to http://packages.debian.org/ and search for packages whose > > name contains "kde" which are located in testing, you will get quite a > > few packages which still have a 3.1.x version. > > Those are: > kdeedu-* > libkdeedu* > and the KDE meta packages. > > The meta packages are probably only changed if a dependency changed. > > kdeedu cause is described at > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kdeedu > An updated kdeedu needs to be pushed into testing but held back due to a > chain of dependencies (looks like qt-x11-free is the cause). Ah, thanks! > Any other packages? Probably not. > HS Wolfgang
Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 11:40 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein: > > On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a > > > mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing? > > > > Haven't seen any KDE 3.1 stuff in Sarge (but I'm not using the whole KDE > > system so maybe...) > > If you go to http://packages.debian.org/ and search for packages whose name > contains "kde" which are located in testing, you will get quite a few > packages which still have a 3.1.x version. Those are: kdeedu-* libkdeedu* and the KDE meta packages. The meta packages are probably only changed if a dependency changed. kdeedu cause is described at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kdeedu An updated kdeedu needs to be pushed into testing but held back due to a chain of dependencies (looks like qt-x11-free is the cause). Any other packages? HS -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de oder über pgp.net PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.org
Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein: > On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a > > mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing? > > Haven't seen any KDE 3.1 stuff in Sarge (but I'm not using the whole KDE > system so maybe...) If you go to http://packages.debian.org/ and search for packages whose name contains "kde" which are located in testing, you will get quite a few packages which still have a 3.1.x version. > [...] Wolfgang
Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
* Steffen Hein [Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:26:19 +0200]: > PS [OT]: Can anyone tell if GIMP 2.0 will make it into Sarge? It would be a > shame if Debian would release with 1.2 a half year after the 2.0 release... effort is being put in ensuring so. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The reader this message encounters not failing to understand is cursed.
Re: KDE 3.2 in sarge?
On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > Hello, > > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a > mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing? Haven't seen any KDE 3.1 stuff in Sarge (but I'm not using the whole KDE system so maybe...) but what would interest me is if KDE 3.2.3 will make it completely into Sarge because currently we have a mix of KDE 3.2.2 and some KDE 3.2.3 packages. Would be very nice because KDE 3.2.3 fixes some really nasty bugs... PS [OT]: Can anyone tell if GIMP 2.0 will make it into Sarge? It would be a shame if Debian would release with 1.2 a half year after the 2.0 release...
KDE 3.2 in sarge?
Hello, will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing? Wolfgang
Re: kde 3.2 in Sarge ?
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:11:35PM +, jmdeleu wrote: > According to this week's Debian News :" A user on Debian Planet > noticed that it is quite unlikely for sarge to include GNOME 2.6, > which has been rescheduled for March 31st. This would be a pity, > especially as KDE 3.2 has gotten in." > > Yet according to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl: kdelibs is > still stalled and has RC bugs and Debian packages testing still only > has 3.1.5. > > What's the real story here ? KDE 3.2.1 is in sid. KDE 3.2.2 will be uploaded to sid next week with all known RC bugs fixed. Apparently the Gnome people don't believe they can get Gnome into shape fast enough to make it in before the Sarge release so they have only uploaded Gnome 2.6 to experimental. I think they probably could get it ready in time since Sarge isn't going to be releasing as fast as anyone originally thought. ;) Currently it looks like Sarge won't release until sometime around June. Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
kde 3.2 in Sarge ?
According to this week's Debian News :" A user on Debian Planet noticed that it is quite unlikely for sarge to include GNOME 2.6, which has been rescheduled for March 31st. This would be a pity, especially as KDE 3.2 has gotten in." Yet according to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl: kdelibs is still stalled and has RC bugs and Debian packages testing still only has 3.1.5. What's the real story here ?
Re: KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Wednesday 24 March 2004 17:44, Courtney Sherman a écrit : > The debs from kde.org were compiled for woody and will have dependency > problems on Libranet which is a mixture of sarge and sid. > > Courtney > > Benjamin Azan wrote: > > You can get kde 3.2 not 3.2.1 which is the latest stable version on the > > repository : > > deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian stable main > > You can use it with the woody distrib too > > > > Le Monday 22 March 2004 22:58, Courtney Sherman a écrit : > >>>Graham, > >>> > >>>Use the unstable (sid) repositories. KDE 3.2 is there and installed > >>>fine on my Libranet system. > >>> > >>>Courtney > >>> > >>>Graham wrote: > Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list > to get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 > and not straight Debian sarge. Ho, I thought a more up-to-date version of library isn't a problem for dependencies which are barely set to package =version number but mor often as package > version number... But may-be I'm wrong - -- <<>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYb0JTJu4BBh+CzIRAo5QAJ90aXErDZjkRf5xnEZg6Es/tG/IfwCgkm2d gBAWxYSVHJZKEjELaZCGlFU= =b7EJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
The debs from kde.org were compiled for woody and will have dependency problems on Libranet which is a mixture of sarge and sid. Courtney Benjamin Azan wrote: You can get kde 3.2 not 3.2.1 which is the latest stable version on the repository : deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian stable main You can use it with the woody distrib too Le Monday 22 March 2004 22:58, Courtney Sherman a écrit : Graham, Use the unstable (sid) repositories. KDE 3.2 is there and installed fine on my Libranet system. Courtney Graham wrote: Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 and not straight Debian sarge.
Re: KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You can get kde 3.2 not 3.2.1 which is the latest stable version on the repository : deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian stable main You can use it with the woody distrib too Le Monday 22 March 2004 22:58, Courtney Sherman a écrit : > Graham, > > Use the unstable (sid) repositories. KDE 3.2 is there and installed > fine on my Libranet system. > > Courtney > > Graham wrote: > > Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to > > get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 and > > not straight Debian sarge. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYKVPTJu4BBh+CzIRAuFMAJ9BkGXMO2GOFrUi94w47TnBPuRhfQCbBNu2 5I3vdE+k6snqg32eUh5XU94= =IIVf -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
Graham, Use the unstable (sid) repositories. KDE 3.2 is there and installed fine on my Libranet system. Courtney Graham wrote: Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 and not straight Debian sarge.
Re: KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to > get KDE 3.2.? Please read the archives before posting. Had you searched the archives, you would have found that you should take a look through http://www.apt-get.org/ if you don't know what to add to your sources.list. -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian. Because it *must* work. debian.org aboutdebian.com pgpoKXi80LirI.pgp Description: PGP signature
KDE 3.2 in Sarge?
Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 and not straight Debian sarge. -- Graham
