Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
On Monday 16 February 2004 10:40 am, Andreas Bauer wrote: > Am Montag, 16. Februar 2004 15:52 schrieb Mark Bucciarelli: > > > > you can install the candidate 3.2 packages now on testing or > > unstable. see the debian wiki for instructions. > > Are there still the same problems open in this packages? Especially > the Kmail filtering troubels? According to the wiki yes. I haven't tested that yet. Regards, Mark
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2004 15:52 schrieb Mark Bucciarelli: > you can install the candidate 3.2 packages now on testing or > unstable. see the debian wiki for instructions. Are there still the same problems open in this packages? Especially the Kmail filtering troubels? Thanks Andi -- Who says education is expensive, doesn't know what stupidity costs. pgpLY0yyFBN2n.pgp Description: signature
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 02:30:42PM +, Andr? Esteves wrote: > Why don't you give proportional attention to the proportion of users in the > respective architectures? If you want to see the results of that thinking, go use Mandrake. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAMOScUzgNqloQMwcRAgJaAKCpC76lZuJ7zjDY0kFdxtBqOioBkACgoa7j 1t6A0IFK0fwrM0QNsqQjc00= =7AjH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
On Monday 16 February 2004 9:30 am, André Esteves wrote: > Em Segunda, 16 de Fevereiro de 2004 07:26, o Adeodato Simó escreveu: [...] > > The reason for the delay is not KDE 3.2 itself taking long to be > > prepared/compiled, but that it must wait until KDE 3.1.5 gets into > > testing before getting into unstable itself. (And for KDE 3.1.5 to > > get into testing, it must be compiled in *all* architectures Debian > > supports, for which there have been lately "some" problems...) > > > > > > Cheers. > > AHHH!!! > I will have not enough patience!!! you can install the candidate 3.2 packages now on testing or unstable. see the debian wiki for instructions. regards, mark
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
> AHHH!!! > I will have not enough patience!!! X'DDD You are not the only one dreaming with kde packages X'DD > Why don't you give proportional attention to the proportion of users in > the > respective architectures? You can find i386 debian packages at ftp://ftp.kde.org You can find powerpc packages at http://jaime.robles.nu/debian/kde-3.2 Is any other architecture available? -- Jaime Robles http://jaime.robles.nu http://www.redlibre.net
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
Em Segunda, 16 de Fevereiro de 2004 07:26, o Adeodato Simó escreveu: > * Robert Tilley [Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:49:23 -0500]: > > Could the more informed members of the list chime in with the current > > progress of KDE 3.2.0 into unstable? > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2004/debian-qt-kde-200402/msg00160.ht >ml > > > Does it really require such a length of time to recompile KDE for the > > unstable libraries or are there issues of which a non-initiate like > > myself is unaware? > > The reason for the delay is not KDE 3.2 itself taking long to be > prepared/compiled, but that it must wait until KDE 3.1.5 gets into > testing before getting into unstable itself. (And for KDE 3.1.5 to > get into testing, it must be compiled in *all* architectures Debian > supports, for which there have been lately "some" problems...) > > > Cheers. AHHH!!! I will have not enough patience!!! Why don't you give proportional attention to the proportion of users in the respective architectures? cheers, Aife -- +-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- + -- http://www.ateismo.net --+ +- siga o nosso diario de uns ateus em www.ateismo.net/diario -+ --- "Durante os tempos de propaganda e logro universal, dizer a verdade transforma-se num acto revolucionário..." -- George Orwell
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
* Robert Tilley [Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:49:23 -0500]: > Could the more informed members of the list chime in with the current > progress > of KDE 3.2.0 into unstable? http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2004/debian-qt-kde-200402/msg00160.html > Does it really require such a length of time to recompile KDE for the > unstable > libraries or are there issues of which a non-initiate like myself is unaware? The reason for the delay is not KDE 3.2 itself taking long to be prepared/compiled, but that it must wait until KDE 3.1.5 gets into testing before getting into unstable itself. (And for KDE 3.1.5 to get into testing, it must be compiled in *all* architectures Debian supports, for which there have been lately "some" problems...) Cheers. -- Adeodato Simó (a.k.a. thibaut) EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | IM: my_dato [jabber.org] | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: David Bowie - Quicksand Proper treatment will cure a cold in seven days, but left to itself, a cold will hang on for a week. -- Darrell Huff signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
Robert Tilley writes: Could the more informed members of the list chime in with the current progress of KDE 3.2.0 into unstable? I have noticed a lot of discussion about this recently. Once progress is made I reckon that the more informed people will give information to us all. Until then I think we should stay patient. Does it really require such a length of time to recompile KDE for the unstable It's a really big package and a lot of testing needs to be done to even enter unstable. libraries or are there issues of which a non-initiate like myself is unaware? -- Comments are appreciated, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KDE 3.2.0 -- Status of Move Into Unstable?
Could the more informed members of the list chime in with the current progress of KDE 3.2.0 into unstable? Does it really require such a length of time to recompile KDE for the unstable libraries or are there issues of which a non-initiate like myself is unaware? -- Comments are appreciated, Bob
