Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 06 January 2005 15:38, Adeodato Simó wrote:
   I belive you can easily find a couple or more bugs related to
   non-working keyboards in kdm. IIRC, it's due to an upsteam change in
   the kdm/Xservers file. We will discuss providing a workaround for the
   3.3.2 packages.

Hmm. Yes, you are right. Checking the BTS, it looks like I was bitten by 
#266106. Fixed it like described there.

I guess I just wasn't expecting a bug like this to make it to Sarge :-(

Anyway, I'm still very happy with the improvements in 3.3.1.
(Although I probably will change the new startup sound: it sounds too 
Windowsish for my taste)


pgpjIjQYSTPho.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 18:07, Andrew Schulman wrote:
 kate always throws out reams of failed assertions to the console.  I
 got sick of it and now use

 function kate
 {
  /usr/bin/kate $@ 2/dev/null
 }

Yes, but that is not a real solution and it is very much worse than in the 
previous version of kate in Sarge.
I yesterday deleted my ~/.xsession-errors, but now it is already at 180kB.

The main culprits are:
ASSERT: !m_doc-wrapCursor() in ../../../kate/part/katerenderer.cpp 
(626)
konqueror: ERROR: Error in BrowserExtension::actionSlotMap(), unknown 
action : searchProvider

IMHO, these really need to be fixed.

I also wonder if these messages really need to be printed:
gpgmeplug checkMessageSignature found email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpgmeplug checkMessageSignature status flags: 3

Cheers,
FJP


pgp9gwwTVUU5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 16:59, Frans Pop wrote:
 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 14:36, Frans Pop wrote:
  Just upgraded to 3.3.1 in Sarge. No problems and...

I ran into one other problem this morning when I booted the system.
The keyboard was completely dead in kdm, including console switching.

In the end I rebooted into single user mode, started kde with 'startx' and 
checked the keyboard settings in the control panel.
It turned out that the Enable keyboard layouts checkbox had somehow been 
deselected and also my Xkb Options were gone.

After resetting these, kdm works normally again.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpMtiHEFQgQ3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-06 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Frans Pop [Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:18:01 +0100]:

 I ran into one other problem this morning when I booted the system.
 The keyboard was completely dead in kdm, including console switching.

 In the end I rebooted into single user mode, started kde with 'startx' and 
 checked the keyboard settings in the control panel.
 It turned out that the Enable keyboard layouts checkbox had somehow been 
 deselected and also my Xkb Options were gone.

 After resetting these, kdm works normally again.

  Correct me if I'm wrong, but the settings of your user's keyborad
  layouts shouldn't affect what happens in kdm.

  I belive you can easily find a couple or more bugs related to
  non-working keyboards in kdm. IIRC, it's due to an upsteam change in
  the kdm/Xservers file. We will discuss providing a workaround for the
  3.3.2 packages.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Andrés Calamaro - Me Pierdo
 
A conference is a gathering of important people who singly can do nothing
but together can decide that nothing can be done.
-- Fred Allen




KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-05 Thread Frans Pop
Hi,

Just upgraded to 3.3.1 in Sarge. No problems and...

I love it!

Thanks to everybody who worked on it!

Cheers,
FJP


pgpRkWtNY2SYe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-05 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 14:36, Frans Pop wrote:
 Just upgraded to 3.3.1 in Sarge. No problems and...

Hmmm. Maybe I spoke a little bit too soon.

If I start kate from konsole, I get tons of messages like:
ASSERT: !m_doc-wrapCursor() in ../../../kate/part/katerenderer.cpp 
(626)

Can anyone confirm?

Cheers,
FJP


pgpycUMNetahs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE 3.3.1 in Sarge

2005-01-05 Thread Andrew Schulman
 If I start kate from konsole, I get tons of messages like:
 ASSERT: !m_doc-wrapCursor() in ../../../kate/part/katerenderer.cpp 
 (626)

kate always throws out reams of failed assertions to the console.  I got 
sick of it and now use

function kate
{
/usr/bin/kate $@ 2/dev/null
}

-- 
To reply by email, replace deadspam.com by alumni.utexas.net




Processed: KDE 3.3.1 in sarge, closes many RC bugs

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 285126 -sarge
Bug#285126: CAN-2004-1171: plain text password exposure
Tags were: sarge patch security
Tags removed: sarge

 tags 271256 -sarge
Bug#271256: EXPLANATION: Why testing lacks some kde packages in some 
architectures
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

 tags 285126 -sarge
Bug#285126: CAN-2004-1171: plain text password exposure
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: sarge

 tags 252670 -sarge
Bug#252670: klaptopdaemon: session-shutdown instantaneously when running on  
batteries
Tags were: sarge fixed-upstream
Tags removed: sarge

 tags 278173 +sid
Bug#278173: kpdf: CAN-2004-0888: arbitrary code execution
Tags were: patch sarge security
Tags added: sid

 tags 253701 -sarge
Bug#253701: krecord: Autobuilt package puts docs in /usr/share/doc/HTML
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

 tags 247243 -sarge
Bug#247243: /usr/bin/startkde: upgrades reset x-session-manager alternative to 
--auto
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Re: KDE 3.3.1 for Sarge

2004-11-21 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

(Sorry for breaking the threads, but I'm not subscribed to d-release.)

I'd be willing to help in testing apps for Sarge, provided that there is 
some clear coordination and the intention is let's go for KDE 3.3.1 
unless ... and not maybe we'll allow KDE 3.3.1 if 

Although I haven't tried 3.3.1 yet (my system is running Sarge), I'd like 
to see it in Sarge as there are several minor annoying problems in 3.2.3 
that I understand are solved in 3.3.1.

I do think that proper support for and easy installation of encryption 
support for kmail (gpgme1.0, kleopatra) should be a condition for 
allowing 3.3.1.
I understand from d-kde this is being worked on.

Cheers,
FJP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBoS5/gm/Kwh6ICoQRAnvGAJ0X7VjKw2sawN9/TFbrAF+JZBsy3wCePRgM
Kpzs267QWweL19z8yNhVK+I=
=+/X9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: KDE 3.3.1 for Sarge

2004-11-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Steve Langasek [Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:47:35 -0800]:

 KDE 3.3 in sarge is contingent on the KDE maintainers being able to provide
 the same sort of assurances that were asked of the GNOME maintainers
 regarding the safety of allowing these packages to trickle in (i.e., the
 correctness of the package relationships), which calls for comprehensive
 partial upgrade testing.

  I have mixed feelinks when wrt 'partial upgrade testing' in KDE. we
  know from experience that KDE upstream really ensures that their
  monolithic x.y.z works together nicely, but that mixing even minor
  point releases can break things very badly.

  so, testing can you give the impression that the mixture works, but
  then it can show breakage unexpectedly. while is true that this could
  happen with Gnome too, it seems to me that for KDE the probability is
  much higher.

 I understand that kparts makes the package relationships more complex than
 those expressed in shlibs alone.  This is one concrete reason I know of why
 testing of partial upgrades is called for -- though of course, there may be
 other reasons I don't know about, as well.

  my personal view/wish of the transition would be to let it happen, in
  a carefully chosen date, the more packages at once the better. if I'm
  not wrong, the full transition can happen, *without* *hints*, in three
  britney runs (kdelibs, then the core of kde, then 5 or so extra
  packages). IMVHO, such transition would have much less probability of
  breaking anything, in fact I think is as good as it can get, given
  kde's characteristics.

 * * *

  (the release managers may wish to skip this section, but please read
  the next one.)

  I attach the current state of kde packages. as calc already stated,
  they're mostly ready. kdemultimedia just needs the alpha buildd admin
  to have a look, and kdenetwork's dependencies will be satisfied soon.

  barring those two, the only important issue remaining is kdepim, which
  I think should get re-uploaded to fix the build system and fix a
  couple of dependency issues (e.g., #274611).

 * * *

  KDE 3.3.1 seems in quite good shape, being #266760 the only serious
  issue which can be resolved with a new arts upload. also, all the
  t-p-u uploads (of which at least 2 are remaining: kdegraphics for
  #278173 and #280373, probably kdenetwork for #282232) could be
  dropped, since all issues are addressed in sid.

  there is, however, one big issue left. my above talking about partial
  upgrades and leting all the transition happen at once, referred only
  to official KDE packages. but there is, as you know, nearly a hundred
  packages currently stalled by kdelibs (some with t-p-u uploads) that
  would become elegible for sarge once kdelibs 3.3.1 was allowed in.

  I have two concerns wrt these packages:

1. since there is no tranisition-all-at-once for them, one has
   really to check that the existing version in sarge will work
   correctly in a KDE 3.3 environment, as newer versions may or may
   not make sarge.

   if/when the KDE transition is approved, and before it happens, I
   volunteer (help welcome) to check the above, either by installing
   kdelibs 3.3 in a sarge system, or by installing the sarge verions
   of the packages in a sid system. most likely, will send mail to
   maintainers, too.

2. most importantly (but perhaps I'm being too paranoid here), and
   as all these packages were well known to be blocked from sarge,
   their versions in sid may not be really good release candidates
   (imagine, e.g., that an experimental version was uploaded to sid
   because it won't enter sarge anyway). hopefully, not candidate
   packages will have serious+ bugs on them, but I prefer to bet on
   the safe side.

   I'm seeking advice as how to deal with this (but perhaps the
   advice is the RMs don't see #2 as a real problem). the best I
   could come up with is a mass bug filing of 'serious' bugs tagged
   sid to all this packages, asking the maintainers to:

  (a) check if the package in sarge works in a KDE 3.3
  environment (so that work for people helping with #1 can
  be reduced)

  (b) close the bug if is their opinion that the package in its
  current form is available for release.

 * * *

  and that was all for now, I think. sorry, as always, for the lengthy
  mail, and keep up the good work.

  cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.
-- Earl Wilson
arts- In testing, should take care of #266760.
kdelibs - Ready to enter

kdebase - Waiting for kdelibs.
kdegraphics - Waiting for kdelibs.
kdeutils- Waiting for kdelibs.
kdeadmin-