Re: KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-29 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Xabi Leon xabi...@free.fr
 Hi, thanks for this upload and all the nice work for KDE in Debian !!
 
 Juste a little problem : we can't safely remove kdebase-bin, because the
 new Rekonq 0.8 still depends on it.
 
 Same problem with Frescobaldi.

Thanks. I've just fixed rekonq in git. Frescobaldi will be fixed later, at 
least 
after we have KDE SC 4.7.x in the archive.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20291602.10628.panfa...@gmail.com



Re: KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-29 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Diggory Hardy diggory.ha...@gmail.com
 Hi,
 
 Cool! I was hoping to install rekonq 0.8 without upgrading everything else
 until its had a little more testing, but I suppose this isn't possible due
 to packaging?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Diggory

Hi,

please next time reply to the list. No, installing rekonq in 4.6 isn't 
possible because it needs at least KDE 4.7, otherwise I would have uploaded it 
to sid.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20292321.51611.panfa...@gmail.com



Re: KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-27 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011 schrieb Xabi Leon:
 Hi, thanks for this upload and all the nice work for KDE in Debian !!

Hi Xabi,

 Juste a little problem : we can't safely remove kdebase-bin, because
 the new Rekonq 0.8 still depends on it.

Had some little hichups during upgrade, but nothing serious. aptitude -t 
experimental-snapshots upgrade didn´t seem to get kdm, so I upgraded it 
and kde-workspace manually. Maybe some little stuff is still at 4.6.5. Will 
check later. 

Rekonq 0.8 installed just fine here.
 
 Same problem with Frescobaldi.

Don´t have that one installed.

Experiences from first login are good. KDE 4.7.2 basically works. The date 
format of the clock in the systray got lost. I remember about that this 
clock has been updated. No problem to set it again.

I have been a bit frightened as I saw that my calendar and journal were 
not displayed anymore. I added the file 
~/.kde/share/apps/korganizer/std.ics which was still there and fine to 
Akonadi resource. Before it hasn´t been in there, so I do not understand 
why it worked before. Well now I have my calendar again. All is fine. I 
wonder whether I can still select which one of my calendars a journal 
entry should go to now that I have to files in the Akonadi resource. I was 
not able to create two different Akonadi resources. But if need be I ask 
this on kdepim-users mailinglist.

So, so far, so good.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20271019.32499.mar...@lichtvoll.de



KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-26 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Hello,


KDE Software Compilation 4.7.2 (except kdepim) has been uploaded to
http://qt-kde.debian.net/

The secondary mirror qt-kde2.debian.net is temporarily unavailable.

Follow instructions on the homepage if you are considering to upgrade or 
install these packages.

Please do *NOT* report bugs in the BTS against these semi-official packages. 
Use 
this mailing list or IRC support channel (#debian-...@irc.debian.org) instead.


Architectures
=

In the past, we provided both amd64 and i386 packages in our semi-official 
repository. This time, we are providing only for amd64 because the developer 
who was in charge of building for i386 is busy right now. We may or may not 
provide i386 packages in the future.


Why 4.7.2?
===

We started to work on KDE SC 4.7.x packages a long time ago. While we were 
working on 4.7.2, KDE SC 4.7.3 was released. With the 4.7.x releases some 
tarballs released by the KDE developers were split and others were renamed. 
This produced some extra work for us, including changing some package 
relationships and adding dummy packages to make the upgrades work.
So when 4.7.3 was released we had to choose between spending our time in 
updating the packages or spending our time in polishing the current package 
relationships and such. We choose the latter and (hopefully) this will lead to 
an easy and straightforward upgrade. Also this will make it easier for us to 
update the packages in the future.


KDEPIM 4.7
===

While developing the 4.7 packages our fellow developer Eshat Cakar experienced 
some important problems with kmail. On the other hand, kdepim 4.4.x wasn't 
tested against 4.7 by upstream KDE developers (unlike what happened with the 
4.6.x releases). Therefore, this may raise some new bugs.[1] 

In hope that we are choosing the lesser of two evils, we are skipping kdepim 
4.7 for now.

Last but not least, note that kdepim developers work on one of the most 
dangerous module (this module can chew users' data if there are important 
bugs) so be patient with them, they deserve our respect.

[1] These bugs probably won't be fixed by us, since we hope to provide any 
kdepim 4.7.x which works better than 4.7.2.


Packages renamed


Some packages were renamed with this release, you can check them here:
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kde47.html

Also, there are some packages which are dummy packages now and which can be 
safely removed, you can remove these (in case they aren't already removed by 
your package manager in the upgrade):
* kdebase-runtime-dbg
* kdebase-apps 
* kdebase-workspace
* kdebase-wokspace-bin
* kdebase-workspace-dev
* kdebase-workspace-dbg
* kdebase-bin
* kdebase-dbg

If removing one of the above mentioned packages makes you remove other 
different packages, probably it's a bug, so please let us know if that happens.

However, probably you would not be able to remove (yet) these dummy packages:
* kdebase-runtime[1]
* kdegraphics-libs-data[2]

[1]because a lot of packages still depend on it. This minor problem will be 
there for a long time until we have no packages depending on kdebase-runtime.

[2]because of koffice.


Rekonq
=

rekonq 0.8.0 has been uploaded to qt-kde.debian.net as well.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20261535.55970.panfa...@gmail.com



Re: KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-26 Thread Dietz Pröpper
José Manuel Santamaría Lema:

 KDE Software Compilation 4.7.2 (except kdepim) has been uploaded to
 http://qt-kde.debian.net/

Hey guys, should you ever drop in my are, I owe you a couple of beer. And 
we have very fine beer here :-).

In short, niiice work!

regards,
Dietz


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: KDE SC 4.7 available in qt-kde.debian.net

2011-11-26 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Samstag, 26. November 2011 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
 Hello,

Hi José!

 KDE Software Compilation 4.7.2 (except kdepim) has been uploaded to
 http://qt-kde.debian.net/

Yieeha! Thank you and all the others who worked on it very much! I am 
grateful for it. I bet it has been a lot of work!

Thanks for omitting kdepim for now. From what I read on kdepim-users 
mailinglist KDEPIM 2, especially KMail 2, can still make a lot of trouble.

 KDEPIM 4.7
 ===
 
 While developing the 4.7 packages our fellow developer Eshat Cakar
 experienced some important problems with kmail. On the other hand,
 kdepim 4.4.x wasn't tested against 4.7 by upstream KDE developers
 (unlike what happened with the 4.6.x releases). Therefore, this may
 raise some new bugs.[1]
 
 In hope that we are choosing the lesser of two evils, we are skipping
 kdepim 4.7 for now.
 
 Last but not least, note that kdepim developers work on one of the most
 dangerous module (this module can chew users' data if there are
 important bugs) so be patient with them, they deserve our respect.

Yes of course. I read in KDE commit digests about lots of bug fixes in 
KDEPIM since 4.7.0 release.

I read that one nasty data loss bug while moving mails from one folder to 
another has been fixed meanwhile. According to Andras Mantia who does a 
immense job informing users about current pitfalls and fixing bugs, it has 
been fixed in 4.7.2 and recent Akonadi server:

Still there were reports of data losing, why? Unfortunately programmers 
are not perfect and introduce bugs in the codebase. One of the most severe 
bugs caused real data losing when copying mails from one folder to 
another. This is fixed with KDE 4.7.2+ and any recent Akonadi server. There 
are other bugs around, but none will cause losing your original data 
files.

Akonadi misconception #1: where is my data?
http://blogs.kde.org/node/4503

IMHO this blog is good to read for anyone who wants to use KDEPIM 2 in the 
future.

Its interesting to note that he thinks that none of the other bugs will 
cause losing original data. But there are still nasty performance and 
other behavorial problems and it seems the default MySQL database setup is 
not safe against crashes or suspend/resume issues. There is a KDE bug open 
for that which suggests changing the InnoDB configuration for MySQL. I can 
dig it up again when needed.

 [1] These bugs probably won't be fixed by us, since we hope to provide
 any kdepim 4.7.x which works better than 4.7.2.

Yep, sure.

I agree to your reasoning with KDEPIM 2.

So, I will wait till tomorrow or so, before trying to upgrade ;).

Thanks again,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20270058.01224.mar...@lichtvoll.de