Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Am Samstag, 28. August 2021, 16:36:52 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Dietz Proepper - 28.08.21, 14:31:45 CEST: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2021, 09:50:16 CEST schrieb Martin > > Steigerwald: > > > Hi. > > > > > > KDEPIM upgrade to 21.08 in Debian Unstable should be possible, > > > unless > > > you rely on Digikam. digikam-private-libs still needs a rebuilt. > > > > > > Did anyone update? Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? > > > > As a quick workaround, if I use kmail from within Kontact, I can > > access all kmail settings via the Kontact setup dialog. > > Thanks, that is a really nice work-around. I did not think of trying > this! I found it out by accident ;-). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Dietz Proepper - 28.08.21, 14:31:45 CEST: > Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2021, 09:50:16 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > Hi. > > > > KDEPIM upgrade to 21.08 in Debian Unstable should be possible, > > unless > > you rely on Digikam. digikam-private-libs still needs a rebuilt. > > > > Did anyone update? Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? > > As a quick workaround, if I use kmail from within Kontact, I can > access all kmail settings via the Kontact setup dialog. Thanks, that is a really nice work-around. I did not think of trying this! Best, -- Martin
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2021, 09:50:16 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hi. > > KDEPIM upgrade to 21.08 in Debian Unstable should be possible, unless > you rely on Digikam. digikam-private-libs still needs a rebuilt. > > Did anyone update? Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? As a quick workaround, if I use kmail from within Kontact, I can access all kmail settings via the Kontact setup dialog. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
On donderdag 26 augustus 2021 18:35:25 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I first upgraded my version 5.83 packages to the ones in unstable: > > aptitude safe-upgrade ~i~V5.83.0 -t experimental > > In Experimental. You're absolutely correct. I mentioned it as I saw various 5.83 programs/libraries and you apparently already had some programs from Norbert installed. > But it could be that this was related to the library mentioned above, so > yeah, could be that some other 5.83 libraries were in use. As mentioned above, that was my 'suspicion' (from the output you posted earlier). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Diederik de Haas - 26.08.21, 15:44:00 CEST: > On donderdag 26 augustus 2021 14:35:08 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Can those of you who see this problem, please try the kmail > > > package > > > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npreining:/ > > > debian-kde:/apps2108/Debian_Unstable/amd64/ > > > kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb (for > > > Debian_Unstable, for testing use Debian_Testing) > > > It should be installable as is. > > > > Not with Debian Unstable packages: > > > > LANG=en dpkg -i kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb > > (Reading database ... 417884 files and directories currently > > installed.) Preparing to unpack kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb ... > > Unpacking kmail (4:21.08.0-1~np1) over (4:21.08.0-1~np1) ... > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of kmail: > > kmail depends on libkf5coreaddons5 (>= 5.84.0); however: > > Version of libkf5coreaddons5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. > > kmail depends on libkf5kcmutils5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: > > Version of libkf5kcmutils5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. > > kmail depends on libkf5xmlgui5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: > > Version of libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. > > I first upgraded my version 5.83 packages to the ones in unstable: > aptitude safe-upgrade ~i~V5.83.0 -t experimental In Experimental. > Started KMail and settings window still didn't work. I did it without > logging out or anything, so there's a reasonable chance the 5.83 > versions were still in use. Hmm, here KMail after installation as above just didn't start as it didn't find some library symbols. But it could be that this was related to the library mentioned above, so yeah, could be that some other 5.83 libraries were in use. Ciao, -- Martin
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
On donderdag 26 augustus 2021 14:35:08 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Can those of you who see this problem, please try the kmail package > > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npreining:/ > > debian-kde:/apps2108/Debian_Unstable/amd64/ > > kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb (for > > Debian_Unstable, for testing use Debian_Testing) > > It should be installable as is. > > Not with Debian Unstable packages: > > LANG=en dpkg -i kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb > (Reading database ... 417884 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking kmail (4:21.08.0-1~np1) over (4:21.08.0-1~np1) ... > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of kmail: > kmail depends on libkf5coreaddons5 (>= 5.84.0); however: > Version of libkf5coreaddons5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. > kmail depends on libkf5kcmutils5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: > Version of libkf5kcmutils5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. > kmail depends on libkf5xmlgui5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: > Version of libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. I first upgraded my version 5.83 packages to the ones in unstable: aptitude safe-upgrade ~i~V5.83.0 -t experimental Started KMail and settings window still didn't work. I did it without logging out or anything, so there's a reasonable chance the 5.83 versions were still in use. I downloaded only kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb and after a reboot, so 5.85 was surely in use, I did 'sudo dpkg -i kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb': [sudo] password for diederik: dpkg: warning: downgrading kmail from 4:21.08.0-1 to 4:21.08.0-1~np1 (Reading database ... 698466 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking kmail (4:21.08.0-1~np1) over (4:21.08.0-1) ... Setting up kmail (4:21.08.0-1~np1) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-17) ... Processing triggers for mailcap (3.70) ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) ... And now KMail's settings window does work :-) Cheers, Diederik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Norbert Preining - 26.08.21, 13:21:33 CEST: > > Did anyone update? Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? > > I did some experiments: > > * frameworks 5.85 (OBS) with kmail from sid (compiled against > frameworks 5.83) > black windows > * installed kmail from my OBS (downgrade to -1~np1) which is compiled > against frameworks 5.85 and running against 5.85 > settings window shows up fine > > > Can those of you who see this problem, please try the kmail package > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npreining:/ > debian-kde:/apps2108/Debian_Unstable/amd64/ > kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb (for > Debian_Unstable, for testing use Debian_Testing) > It should be installable as is. Not with Debian Unstable packages: LANG=en dpkg -i kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 417884 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking kmail (4:21.08.0-1~np1) over (4:21.08.0-1~np1) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of kmail: kmail depends on libkf5coreaddons5 (>= 5.84.0); however: Version of libkf5coreaddons5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. kmail depends on libkf5kcmutils5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: Version of libkf5kcmutils5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. kmail depends on libkf5xmlgui5 (>= 5.85.0-1~np1); however: Version of libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 on system is 5.83.0-2. dpkg: error processing package kmail (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-17) ... Processing triggers for mailcap (3.70) ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.26-1) ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) ... Errors were encountered while processing: kmail Thanks, -- Martin
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Hej, Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2021, 13:21:33 CEST schrieb Norbert Preining: [...] > > That would give tests with > kmail compiled against frameworks 5.85 but running at 5.83 I was running Frameworks 5.85 from experimental and kmail 21.08 from unstable (compiled against 5.83) and I got the blank window. With Norbert's kmail version compiled against Frameworks 5.85, the settings window is back to normal. > If that fails, then I suspect a bug in 5.83 and suggest we upload 5.85 > ASAP. Agree. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
Hi all, > Did anyone update? Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? I did some experiments: * frameworks 5.85 (OBS) with kmail from sid (compiled against frameworks 5.83) black windows * installed kmail from my OBS (downgrade to -1~np1) which is compiled against frameworks 5.85 and running against 5.85 settings window shows up fine Can those of you who see this problem, please try the kmail package https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npreining:/debian-kde:/apps2108/Debian_Unstable/amd64/kmail_21.08.0-1~np1_amd64.deb (for Debian_Unstable, for testing use Debian_Testing) It should be installable as is. That would give tests with kmail compiled against frameworks 5.85 but running at 5.83 If that fails, then I suspect a bug in 5.83 and suggest we upload 5.85 ASAP. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Re: KDEPIM 21.08: blank settings window in KMail
> Did anyone update? Yes, i did > Do you also see a blank settings window in KMail? Yes, i see it. In spite of everything, kmail works perfectly, so I too will check better when I will have more time. Regards -- Marco Valli
