Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:45:28AM -0700, Brian Kimball wrote: (I bound those keys to those functions so I can see what my newly installed spamassassin is doing. I now find it kind of ironic that since I've installed spamassassin I've never spent more time looking at or been more curious about spam!) The plan is working, Emperor Ming. Nick
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Saturday 07 August 2004 9:13 am, Roy Bixler wrote: I wonder if anyone has noticed that KMail 3.2.3-1 version recently uploaded is less stable than the 3.2.2-2 version. In particular, I sometimes do a V (View Source) command to view the full source of a message to see its full headers. This never caused a problem before, but with the 3.2.3-1 KMail version, it crashes quite frequently with the V command. Of course, having updated the night before, as I was reading your message, I thought Huh - that's interesting and pushed V without even thinking. Of course, Kontact crashed like a drunken man on a unicycle: hard, fast, immediately. So, I have to say, you're right. Scott -- R. Scott Granneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ www.granneman.com Join GranneNotes! Information at www.granneman.com Publications: http://www.granneman.com/personal/work/publications.htm Read my blog at http://blog.granneman.com Verbing weirds language. ---Calvin Hobbes
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Saturday 07 August 2004 16:35, Scott Granneman wrote: Of course, having updated the night before, as I was reading your message, I thought Huh - that's interesting and pushed V without even thinking. Of course, Kontact crashed like a drunken man on a unicycle: hard, fast, immediately. Good to know that I'm not the only stupid one reading a bug report and instantly trying it out :-) Never seen something crashing that fast. I can confirm this bug. Have fun, Marcus -- :: Marcus Thiesen :: www.thiesen.org :: ICQ#108989768 :: 0x754675F2 :: It's easier to fix a broken spec than 10,000 broken programs. Larry Wall
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Saturday 07 August 2004 07:35 am, Scott Granneman wrote: Of course, having updated the night before, as I was reading your message, I thought Huh - that's interesting and pushed V without even thinking. Of course, Kontact crashed like a drunken man on a unicycle: hard, fast, immediately. So, I have to say, you're right. Exact same happened to me. It was pretty damn funny. FWIW, I've been using Alt+H bound to all headers and Alt+F to switch back to fancy headers. Works good for me. brian (I bound those keys to those functions so I can see what my newly installed spamassassin is doing. I now find it kind of ironic that since I've installed spamassassin I've never spent more time looking at or been more curious about spam!)
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
* Marcus Thiesen [Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:40:38 +0200]: On Saturday 07 August 2004 16:35, Scott Granneman wrote: Of course, having updated the night before, as I was reading your message, I thought Huh - that's interesting and pushed V without even thinking. Of course, Kontact crashed like a drunken man on a unicycle: hard, fast, immediately. Good to know that I'm not the only stupid one reading a bug report and instantly trying it out :-) Never seen something crashing that fast. I can confirm this bug. #263895, reported yesterday. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The problem I have with making an intelligent statement is that some people then think that it's not an isolated occurrance. -- Simon Travaglia
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
Roy Bixler wrote: I wonder if anyone has noticed that KMail 3.2.3-1 version recently uploaded is less stable than the 3.2.2-2 version. In particular, I sometimes do a V (View Source) command to view the full source of a message to see its full headers. This never caused a problem before, but with the 3.2.3-1 KMail version, it crashes quite frequently with the V command. My solution for now is to revert to the 3.2.2-2 package off of snapshot.debian.net and downgrade to sarge from unstable. Since I've reverted, KMail is stable as before. I am not experiencing this problem with 3.2.3-1. Running Libranet/Debian.
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Saturday 07 August 2004 8:13 am, Roy Bixler wrote: I wonder if anyone has noticed that KMail 3.2.3-1 version recently uploaded is less stable than the 3.2.2-2 version. In particular, I sometimes do a V (View Source) command to view the full source of a message to see its full headers. This never caused a problem before, but with the 3.2.3-1 KMail version, it crashes quite frequently with the V command. My solution for now is to revert to the 3.2.2-2 package off of snapshot.debian.net and downgrade to sarge from unstable. Since I've reverted, KMail is stable as before. If it matters, I'm running on a Sun Ultrasparc (Blade 100) machine with the official Debian 2.4.26 Linux kernel. Bug confirmed on my system, Debian Sid running on 650MHz Athlon. Doug pgpl7aMUEKDut.pgp Description: signature
Re: KMail 3.2.3-1 instability
On Sat 7 August 2004 10:45, Brian Kimball wrote: Exact same happened to me. It was pretty damn funny. FWIW, I've been using Alt+H bound to all headers and Alt+F to switch back to fancy headers. Works good for me. brian (I bound those keys to those functions so I can see what my newly installed spamassassin is doing. I now find it kind of ironic that since I've installed spamassassin I've never spent more time looking at or been more curious about spam!) It wears off once you get it working reliably :). There's supposed to be a new feature going into KMail (already exists as a patch somewhere) to allow the user to view specific additional headers. In my case I'd use X-Bogosity so I can tell how well Bogofilter is doing on both ham and spam without having to press 'V' all the time. On a side note, the wonderful thing about spam is it gives you a large body of email to experiment on (mainly for rewriting various things). If you make a mistake - just delete it and try again on another. One of the good ones I've created is a KMail filter to rewrite the date of messages identified as spam so when I expire them from my Junk folder it actually deletes all the ones it should (otherwise spam with forward dates hangs around for eons). -- David P James Ottawa, Ontario http://david.jamesnet.ca ICQ: #42891899, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Noone isn't no one pgp0tYXRFgwtL.pgp Description: signature
