Re: status of 2.2.1

2001-11-15 Thread John Gay
On Thursday 15 November 2001 01:54, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
>   Nope. But he's got a number of packages done. Yer isolated. Sure enough.
>
>   Yes Jaye, there IS a Santa Clause! And not only that, yer box has 
> already
> been updated (ain't big bros handy?) and NO, yer NOT running a full 2.2.x
> system. Ivan (bless that man) is still working with the upstream people,
> and his own boxes to get the packages all updated. But you've got SOME of
> them.
>
> :--)
>
>  kate   2.2.1.0-6
>  kbattleship2.2.0-final-2
>  kdecarddecks   2.2.0-final-2
>  kdelibs3   2.2.1-14
>  kdelibs3-crypt 2.2.1-11
>  kdelibs3-cups  2.2.1-14
>  kdessh 2.2.1-1.2
>  kdewallpapers  2.2.1.0-6
>  klines 2.2.0-final-2
>  konqueror  2.2.1.0-6
>  konsole2.2.1.0-6
>  kscreensaver   2.2.1
> .0-6
>  ktimer 2.2.1-1.4
>
>   So, that's where yer at now. Most everything should work well now. Enjoy
> it.
>
> > tia
>
I noticed the new KDE2.2 packages in the testing tree. Currently I'm running 
testing with the unstable KDE packages, thanks to plenty of help getting the 
two to co-operate on my system. I was hoping that with KDE2.2 finally 
starting to migrate into testing to remove the unstable references in my 
sources.list and stay sync'd with testing.

Does anyone know if this could lead to problems, or can apt keep things 
straight for me?

I have not done a proper dist-upgrade since I suceeded in getting the 
unstable packages to install because my system now wants to install many 
non-kde related packages from unstable, hence my desire to return to a pure 
testing platform as soon as the archives catch up with what I currently have 
from unstable now.

Thanks again for all the work and effort that everyone has put into packaging 
KDE for Debian and all the help with my preferences and sources.list to 
getting KDE2.2.1 running for me in the first place!

Cheers,

John Gay




Re: status of 2.2.1

2001-11-14 Thread Ben Burton

> I have not seen any mail regarding the status of kde2.2.1 for woody.  Has
> it been fully updated on servers and ready for consumption?

A number of my 2.2.1 KDE modules had porting issues; these have all been 
resolved except for kdeaddons and are just waiting for their 10 days in sid 
to expire.

Ben.

-- 

Ben Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/
Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We teach people how to remember, we never teach them how to grow.
- Oscar Wilde




Re: status of 2.2.1

2001-11-14 Thread G. L. `Griz' Inabnit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Wednesday 14 November 2001 05:09 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> Greetings:
Salutaions!
>
> I have not seen any mail regarding the status of kde2.2.1 for woody.
Broke yer mailer, huh? Too bad. That sux. But no, not everything is 
finished.

> Has it been fully updated on servers and ready for consumption?
Nope. But he's got a number of packages done. Yer isolated. Sure enough.

Yes Jaye, there IS a Santa Clause! And not only that, yer box has 
already
been updated (ain't big bros handy?) and NO, yer NOT running a full 2.2.x
system. Ivan (bless that man) is still working with the upstream people, and
his own boxes to get the packages all updated. But you've got SOME of them.
:--)

 kate   2.2.1.0-6
 kbattleship2.2.0-final-2
 kdecarddecks   2.2.0-final-2
 kdelibs3   2.2.1-14
 kdelibs3-crypt 2.2.1-11
 kdelibs3-cups  2.2.1-14
 kdessh 2.2.1-1.2
 kdewallpapers  2.2.1.0-6
 klines 2.2.0-final-2
 konqueror  2.2.1.0-6
 konsole2.2.1.0-6
 kscreensaver   2.2.1.0-6
 ktimer 2.2.1-1.4

So, that's where yer at now. Most everything should work well now. 
Enjoy it.

>
> tia

- --
__
   OutCast Computer Consultants of Central Oregon
 http://outcast-consultants.redmond.or.us
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (541) 504-1388
Toll Free (866) 562-7160
 Via IRC at; 205.227.115.251:6667:#OutCasts
   Via ICQ: UIN 138930

"Failure is not an option...it's bundled with Microsoft"
-anonymous-

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!

"Software is like sex. They're both better when they're free!!" - Linus
Torvalds

"As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to
advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal
amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product."