Bug#1069163: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1069163: fixed in libkf5ksieve 4:22.12.3-2)
Hi there, With a test build provided by Patrick, I was able to confirm that this fixes the issue on my system. Thank you for the swift response! kind regards, -- Jonas Schäfer Team Lead Cloud Infrastructure Development Cloud Technologies GmbH Königsbrücker Straße 96 | 01099 Dresden +49 351 479 367 37 jonas.schae...@cloudandheat.com | www.cloudandheat.com Green, Open, Efficient. Your Cloud Service and Cloud Technology Provider from Dresden. https://www.cloudandheat.com/ Commercial Register: District Court Dresden Register Number: HRB 30549 VAT ID No.: DE281093504 Managing Director: Nicolas Röhrs Authorized signatory: Dr. Marius Feldmann signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1057050 {Done: Patrick Franz } [src:qt6-multimedia]
qt6-multimedia: Please build with EIGEN_DONT_VECTORIZE on powerpc to fix FTBFS
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions qt6-multimedia/6.6.1-1.
--
1057050: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1057050: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1)
Control: reopen -1 Hi, looks like this didn't work: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qt6-multimedia=powerpc=6.4.2-11=1705003199=0 Reopening the bug therefore. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Processed: Re: Bug#1024752 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1024752: fixed in qt6-websockets 6.4.1-2)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1024752 {Done: Patrick Franz } [src:qt6-websockets]
qt6-websockets FTCBFS: does not pass QT_HOST_PATH
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions qt6-websockets/6.4.1-2.
--
1024752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1024752: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1024752: fixed in qt6-websockets 6.4.1-2)
Control: reopen -1 Hi Patrick, On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 12:57:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters > (reply to Patrick Franz ). I think the patch got broken during application. extra_cmake_args vs cmake_extra_args. Could you fix that up? Helmut
Bug#1023001: Reply
Hi Andrés, On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:53:27 +0200 Andrés Segarra wrote: > No, I didn't. I simply ran apt update + upgrade, as I've always done. > The transition to plasma 5.25 worked perfectly, and I've not done > anything different. Here is a thread on the forum where another user > reports this bug: https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=153180 "apt upgrade" does not remove installed packages from your machine. Please take a look at your /var/log/apt/history.log and post the entry incl. the commandline that removed plasma-desktop. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
Bug#1023001: Reply
No, I didn't. I simply ran apt update + upgrade, as I've always done. The transition to plasma 5.25 worked perfectly, and I've not done anything different. Here is a thread on the forum where another user reports this bug: https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=153180 --- Andrés Segarra
Bug#1010747: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Georges Khaznadar ) (Bug#1010747: fixed in pyacidobasic 2.11.1-2)
On Wed, May 18 2022, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the shiboken2 package: > > #1010747: Unusable with current python version > > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters > (reply to Georges Khaznadar > ). This bug was against shiboken2, but was fixed pyacidobasic? I just verified nothing has been fixed in shiboken2 yet.
Bug#1000976: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1000976: fixed in plasma-systemmonitor 5.23.4-2)
On 2021-12-03 at 19:17 Patrick Franz wrote: > In this case, "qml-module-org-kde-kcm" seems to be missing. Yes - installing this module allows to start plasma-systemmonitor. Thanks.
Bug#976274: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Dmitry Shachnev ) (Bug#976274: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.2+dfsg-2)
On Freitag, 11. Dezember 2020 10:09:05 CET you wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the libqt5gui5 package: > > #976274: libqt5gui5: Please build Qt5 with configure option > -xcb-native-painting > > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters > (reply to Dmitry Shachnev ). Thanks, works for me :-) Cheers, André
Bug#972257: kdeconnect notification for reply sometimes inverts text (or action) on "reply"/"mark as read"
Package: kdeconnect Version: 20.04.3-1 Severity: important Hi. It's been some releases now that this problem annoyed me. At first I thought it was just because the feature was still young. And I still don't know if it's an l10n related problem or a design problem. Here is what happens : when receiving SMS or other notification (eg: whatsapp) on the phone that I can reply to, I get a notification on the desktop application with the notification text and 2 buttons, 1 to reply to the notification, 1 to mark it as read. However : - for the 1st notification received in a discussion, the 2 buttons work as expected : "Reply" opens a reply window, "Mark as read" marks the message as read and that's it. - for the following notifications, the 2 buttons are inverted (in position : where previously "Reply" was written, contains now "Mark as read" and vice versa) but they act as if they were not inverted. Sometimes they come back ok (I don't know the trigger that puts them back right). It's of course misleading mostly when wanting to reply and it marks the message as read so we need to find the message on the phone and reply from there... -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages kdeconnect depends on: ii kde-cli-tools 4:5.17.5-2 ii kio 5.70.1-1 ii libc6 2.31-3 ii libfakekey0 0.3+git20170516-2 ii libkf5configcore5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5configwidgets5 5.70.0-2 ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.70.0-2 ii libkf5dbusaddons5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5i18n5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5iconthemes5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5kcmutils5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5kiocore55.70.1-1 ii libkf5kiofilewidgets5 5.70.1-1 ii libkf5kiowidgets5 5.70.1-1 ii libkf5notifications5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5people5 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5pulseaudioqt2 1.2-2 ii libkf5service-bin 5.70.0-1 ii libkf5service55.70.0-1 ii libkf5waylandclient5 4:5.70.0-1 ii libkf5widgetsaddons5 5.70.0-1 ii libqca-qt5-2 2.3.1-1 ii libqca-qt5-2-plugins 2.3.1-1 ii libqt5core5a 5.14.2+dfsg-6 ii libqt5dbus5 5.14.2+dfsg-6 ii libqt5gui55.14.2+dfsg-6 ii libqt5multimedia5 5.14.2-3 ii libqt5network55.14.2+dfsg-6 ii libqt5qml55.14.2+dfsg-3 ii libqt5quick5 5.14.2+dfsg-3 ii libqt5widgets55.14.2+dfsg-6 ii libqt5x11extras5 5.14.2-2 ii libstdc++610.2.0-13 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.12-1 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.3-1 ii plasma-framework 5.70.1-1 ii qml-module-org-kde-kirigami2 5.70.0-1 ii qml-module-org-kde-people 5.70.0-1 ii qml-module-qtquick-controls 5.14.2-2 ii qml-module-qtquick-controls2 5.14.2+dfsg-2 ii qml-module-qtquick-layouts5.14.2+dfsg-3 ii qml-module-qtquick2 5.14.2+dfsg-3 ii sshfs 3.7.0+repack-1 kdeconnect recommends no packages. Versions of packages kdeconnect suggests: pn python3-nautilus -- no debconf information
Processed: housecleaning - please reply if you think 'wishlist' is wrong
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # housecleaning - please reply if you think 'wishlist' is wrong, > # or simply if something is a more pressing issue, I'll happily > # upgrade the severity then. Or just do it yourself, please! :) > tags 879967 - moreinfo Bug #879967 [src:qtmultimedia-opensource-src] qtmultimedia-opensource-src: FTBFS on sparc64: tst_qdeclarativemultimediaglobal segfault at startup Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #879967 to the same tags previously set > tags 486754 - moreinfo Bug #486754 [developers-reference] standardize transitional package tags Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > severity 879967 wishlist Bug #879967 [src:qtmultimedia-opensource-src] qtmultimedia-opensource-src: FTBFS on sparc64: tst_qdeclarativemultimediaglobal segfault at startup Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' > severity 376590 wishlist Bug #376590 [developers-reference] developers-reference: suggests to test downgrading Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 470960 wishlist Bug #470960 [developers-reference] 6.7.8.2: point 4 (use foo-ver.orig for repacked tarballs) seems backwards Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 541956 wishlist Bug #541956 [developers-reference] Fw: t-p-u description in dev-ref Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 550283 wishlist Bug #550283 [developers-reference] devref: §5.3. - clarify to install and test on an up-to-date unstable system Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 561494 wishlist Bug #561494 [developers-reference] devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 620686 wishlist Bug #620686 [developers-reference] document how to deal with technically negligent developers Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 731666 wishlist Bug #731666 [developers-reference] suggest to think about testing before uploading to unstable. Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 742552 wishlist Bug #742552 [developers-reference] developers-reference should encourage verification of upstream cryptographic signatures Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 754189 wishlist Bug #754189 [developers-reference] developers-reference: describe maintenance workflow for developers-reference Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 757274 wishlist Bug #757274 [developers-reference] devref: please point upstream to PTS subscription UI when forwarding bugs Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 807441 wishlist Bug #807441 [src:developers-reference] rename procedure out of date Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 808314 wishlist Bug #808314 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: maintainer scripts: /usr is always there Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 823584 wishlist Bug #823584 [developers-reference] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 830562 wishlist Bug #830562 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Document expectations & best practices for including AppArmor policy in packages Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 884857 wishlist Bug #884857 [developers-reference] developers-reference: clarify process on retirement/improve wording Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 896015 wishlist Bug #896015 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Changes to conventions for uploading to stable-proposed-updates Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > severity 908155 wishlist Bug #908155 [src:developers-reference] Coordination with upstream developers not universally applied Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 376590: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=376590 470960: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470960 486754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486754 541956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541956 550283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550283 561494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561494 620686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620686 731666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731666 742552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742552 754189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754189 757274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757274 807441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807441 808314: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808314 823584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823584 830562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830562 879967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879967 884857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Improper usage of Reply-To header - Debian Bug #639455
Hi Aleksey, Moments ago you actioned a change to Debian Bug #639455. In your email to make this change, you included a Reply-To header, set to the kde general user support mailing list, k...@mail.kde.org. Mail concerning this bug report is off topic for that mailing list, as it relates to a specific distribution, and isn't itself a user support query. If you could please refrain from including this header in future mails to Debian bugs that would be appreciated. Regards, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin
Re: Reply to SMS in kde connect
On viernes, 25 de noviembre de 2016 19:14:07 ART newbee...@nativobject.net wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to reply to SMS using kde connect but it doesn't seem to work... > > The button "reply" is here but when I push it, nothing happened and it > disappears... > > Is there any configuration or workaround to make it works ? Some features depend upon the Android version. That being said I never got to update the package (although I'm not the official maintainer). Last time I tried tests where failing but I could not check why. If anyone is willing to help... just say it :) -- No pienses que estoy loco, es sólo una manera de actuar De mí - Charly García Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Reply to SMS in kde connect
Hi, I tried to reply to SMS using kde connect but it doesn't seem to work... The button "reply" is here but when I push it, nothing happened and it disappears... Is there any configuration or workaround to make it works ? Regards Mourad
Re: Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
On 05/07/2014 10:32 AM, sibi kanagaraj wrote: //, I would say that cleaning some old bugs would help us. That means checking bugs that have no activity for quite some time (let's say 6 months), verify that the bug is still there and close it otherwise. In any case, add a new entry in the bug log saying what you found.// I have not done this before . So , I decided to wait for few days and observe the happenings and thought that I could figure out what is to be done . Daily I see some 10-12 bug tracking mails .Apart from that , I have not been able to trace out whats happening . If there is any documentation on what is to be read , I will read it and start checking the bugs . You could start here: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ The best is to validate if you can reproduce the bugs on your setup. If yes, further investigate whether it is a packaging bug or a bug in KDE upstream. If an upstream bug, check in upstream tracker if there is already a bug filed. If not filed, file a bug upstream and associate the Debian bug to it. If it is a packaging bug, please add that detail in the bug report. Over time you will start fixing the bugs. -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/0sto3b-2og@news.researchut.com
Re: Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
¡Hola sibi! El 2014-05-07 a las 10:32 +0530, sibi kanagaraj escribió: //, I would say that cleaning some old bugs would help us. That means checking bugs that have no activity for quite some time (let's say 6 months), verify that the bug is still there and close it otherwise. In any case, add a new entry in the bug log saying what you found.// I have not done this before . So , I decided to wait for few days and observe the happenings and thought that I could figure out what is to be done . Daily I see some 10-12 bug tracking mails .Apart from that , I have not been able to trace out whats happening . It's not always easy to know what's happening. :) I think the motto for this call for help could be don't be affraid to ask for help. So you are encouraged to ask, using irc has some advantages for this, but it's perfectly fine if you prefer mail. Rereading what I ask you to do, it's a quite hard task, as it's phrased in a way that makes me think do this query and work on the results, but the query part is not easy at all. I finally managed to get a list with a very unefficient sql query to udd.debian.org: select distinct bs.id, bs.status, bs.last_modified from public.all_packages as ps join public.all_bugs bs on (ps.package = bs.package) where ( ps.maintainer_email = 'debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org' or ps.maintainer_email = 'pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org' ) and bs.status != 'done' and bs.status != 'fixed' and (bs.last_modified + interval '6 months') now(); For which you need to do the query from alioth as is documented here: https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ And sort of understand the database schema: https://udd.debian.org/schema/udd.html#public.view.all-bugs All of it is way beyond what I intended as a first task, I'm really sorry. Please, if someone has a better way to get this results, tell me. If there is any documentation on what is to be read , I will read it and start checking the bugs . There is some, but its quite dispersed, improving the documentation to become a more welcomming team is one of the things that we need to do, please don't forget your first doubts so you can help us improve the experience. -- If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -- France's Rule of Folly Saludos /\/\ /\ `/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140507084823.gp14...@gnuservers.com.ar
Re: Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
Good afternoon, I too am planning on helping out and have been reading the recommended web pages. On 7 May 2014 09:48, Maximiliano Curia m...@gnuservers.com.ar wrote: It's not always easy to know what's happening. :) Is this part of the problem? It seems that there isn't a clear bug tracker like launchpad for ubuntu or bugzilla or Fedora. There appears to be no concise dashboard of work items and tickets for the group. I thought that the ideal list to work with was: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org;dist=unstable#_0_3_4 However you are implying better data can be gotten from udd: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=jessiemerged=ignfnewerval=7flastmodval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=ascformat=html#results It would be nice if someone gave direction for a sprint in which we have a group start with sid, a group with jessie and perhaps another with wheezey on virtual machines. Then in week one we work through the Outstanding Important - Unclassified to classify them either by marking as upstream, wontfix or reproducible. Then work on the next set. Perhaps make it the first week of each month to do the same thing? I've been wondering how much automation is surrounding the whole packaging process? I've not yet found a code review for the packaging process. It appears to rely on packagers testing and hoping that others also test: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_add_a_new_package_to_the_archive.3F I was hoping that a system that automates building the package, installing it and then throwing up any warnings from the install process, possibly for x86 and amd64, however I've not yet bumped into anything. These are just some of my work in progress thoughts so far. I've not discovered everything about debian yet, but I am getting to understand things a little better each day. Regards Phil Hannent
Re: Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
Hi all , //, I would say that cleaning some old bugs would help us. That means checking bugs that have no activity for quite some time (let's say 6 months), verify that the bug is still there and close it otherwise. In any case, add a new entry in the bug log saying what you found.// I have not done this before . So , I decided to wait for few days and observe the happenings and thought that I could figure out what is to be done . Daily I see some 10-12 bug tracking mails .Apart from that , I have not been able to trace out whats happening . If there is any documentation on what is to be read , I will read it and start checking the bugs . -Sibi On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Maximiliano Curia m...@gnuservers.com.arwrote: ¡Hola sibi! El 2014-05-02 a las 18:39 +0530, sibi kanagaraj escribió: I saw a mail in mailing list , on call fro help from the KDE team . I would like to know if I could be of any help . Assigning tasks is way too hard, it's easier for us if you tell us which of the tasks listed in the call for help [1] interest you and how can we help you with it. If you still prefer to have a task assigned, I would say that cleaning some old bugs would help us. That means checking bugs that have no activity for quite some time (let's say 6 months), verify that the bug is still there and close it otherwise. In any case, add a new entry in the bug log saying what you found. [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg8.html Have fun, -- UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity. -- Dennis Ritchie Saludos /\/\ /\ `/
Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
Dear team , I saw a mail in mailing list , on call fro help from the KDE team http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-india/2014-May/001237.html. I would like to know if I could be of any help . -Sibi
Re: Reply for Call for help from KDE Team
¡Hola sibi! El 2014-05-02 a las 18:39 +0530, sibi kanagaraj escribió: I saw a mail in mailing list , on call fro help from the KDE team . I would like to know if I could be of any help . Assigning tasks is way too hard, it's easier for us if you tell us which of the tasks listed in the call for help [1] interest you and how can we help you with it. If you still prefer to have a task assigned, I would say that cleaning some old bugs would help us. That means checking bugs that have no activity for quite some time (let's say 6 months), verify that the bug is still there and close it otherwise. In any case, add a new entry in the bug log saying what you found. [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg8.html Have fun, -- UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity. -- Dennis Ritchie Saludos /\/\ /\ `/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717113: marked as done (kmail: Please default reply using HTML if present to False)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:49:06 + with message-id e1v6ghg-83...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#717113: fixed in kdepim 4:4.10.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #717113, regarding kmail: Please default reply using HTML if present to False to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 717113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kmail Version: 4:4.10.5-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The new KMail2 has a new configuration option, reply using HTML if present (or, in the coming 4.11, reply or forward...). The default value for this option is True. However, as far as I can see, using this option creates some breakages, and more importantly, it deviates from the behavior of KMail1, where the behavior enabled by this option was not available. In the interest of smoother transitions for KMail1 users, please set this option to off by default -- at least when migrating old accounts -- on Debian. Thanks, Shai. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kde-runtime 4:4.10.5-1 ii kdepim-runtime4:4.10.5-1 ii kdepimlibs-kio-plugins4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-contact4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-kde4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-kmime4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadiprotocolinternals1 1.9.2-2 ii libc6 2.17-7 ii libcalendarsupport4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-6 ii libgpgme++2 4:4.10.5-1 ii libincidenceeditorsng44:4.10.5-1 ii libkabc4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcalcore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcalutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcmutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkdecore5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkdepim44:4.10.5-1 ii libkdeui5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkio5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkleo4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkmime4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkontactinterface4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkparts44:4.10.5-1 ii libkpgp4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimidentities44:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimtextedit4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkprintutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libksieveui4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libktnef4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmailcommon44:4.10.5-1 ii libmailimporter4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmailtransport4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagecomposer4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagecore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagelist4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessageviewer4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libnepomukcore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libpimcommon4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-network4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-xml4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtcore44:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtwebkit4 2.2.1-6 ii libsolid4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libsoprano4 2.9.2+dfsg.1-1 ii libstdc++64.8.1-6 ii libtemplateparser44:4.10.5-1 ii perl 5.14.2-21 Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii gnupg-agent 2.0.20-1 ii gnupg22.0.20-1 ii pinentry-gtk2 [pinentry-x11] 0.8.1-1 Versions of packages kmail suggests: ii bogofilter 1.2.2+dfsg1-3 pn clamav | f-prot-installer none ii kaddressbook 4:4.10.5-1 pn kleopatra none ii procmail 3.22-20 ii spambayes 1.1a6-1 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: kdepim Source-Version: 4:4.10.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#717113: kmail: Please default reply using HTML if present to False
Package: kmail Version: 4:4.10.5-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The new KMail2 has a new configuration option, reply using HTML if present (or, in the coming 4.11, reply or forward...). The default value for this option is True. However, as far as I can see, using this option creates some breakages, and more importantly, it deviates from the behavior of KMail1, where the behavior enabled by this option was not available. In the interest of smoother transitions for KMail1 users, please set this option to off by default -- at least when migrating old accounts -- on Debian. Thanks, Shai. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kde-runtime 4:4.10.5-1 ii kdepim-runtime4:4.10.5-1 ii kdepimlibs-kio-plugins4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-contact4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-kde4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadi-kmime4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libakonadiprotocolinternals1 1.9.2-2 ii libc6 2.17-7 ii libcalendarsupport4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-6 ii libgpgme++2 4:4.10.5-1 ii libincidenceeditorsng44:4.10.5-1 ii libkabc4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcalcore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcalutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkcmutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkdecore5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkdepim44:4.10.5-1 ii libkdeui5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkio5 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkleo4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkmime4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkontactinterface4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkparts44:4.10.5-1 ii libkpgp4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimidentities44:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimtextedit4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkpimutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libkprintutils4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libksieveui4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libktnef4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmailcommon44:4.10.5-1 ii libmailimporter4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmailtransport4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagecomposer4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagecore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessagelist4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libmessageviewer4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libnepomukcore4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libpimcommon4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-network4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-xml4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtcore44:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+dfsg-2 ii libqtwebkit4 2.2.1-6 ii libsolid4 4:4.10.5-1 ii libsoprano4 2.9.2+dfsg.1-1 ii libstdc++64.8.1-6 ii libtemplateparser44:4.10.5-1 ii perl 5.14.2-21 Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii gnupg-agent 2.0.20-1 ii gnupg22.0.20-1 ii pinentry-gtk2 [pinentry-x11] 0.8.1-1 Versions of packages kmail suggests: ii bogofilter 1.2.2+dfsg1-3 pn clamav | f-prot-installer none ii kaddressbook 4:4.10.5-1 pn kleopatra none ii procmail 3.22-20 ii spambayes 1.1a6-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130716232207.3219.17178.reportbug@deblack.local
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Tuesday, 2013-05-07, Ross Boylan wrote: On Monday, May 06, 2013 10:00:12 AM Kevin Krammer wrote: On Monday, 2013-05-06, Ross Boylan wrote: Are you saying it's a KDE standard to always use capital letters? That's quite confusing to me, since lower and upper case letters often do different things--in fact they do different things in KMail, as I found. No, what I am saying is that, at least the default style's visual hint for keyboard shortcut uses the symbol on the key to mean the key Since the symbol on the physical key is uppercase, that comes down to the same thing, i.e. display an uppercase letter when a lower case letter is meant. Indeed, which is why the actual uppercase letter is referred to as a Shift + the letter, a modifier/key combination. I may be particularly sensitive to this since I'm also using mutt, for which there are many cases in which lower and upper case differ, and both do something useful. That is also often the case in KDE applications. Any such shortcut will be depict as the keyboard combination that is necessary for that letter to happen, which is Shift + the letter (unless of course capslock is active, but I don't think the keyboard shortcut visual hint changes when that happens). and uses modifiers to mean that the key needs to be pressed while the depict combination of modifier keys are held. I am not aware of any keyboard that uses lowercase letters on its keycaps, but if course if you have such a keyboard that the visualization hint That's not the issue. The issue is that an uppercase shortcut suggests, at least to me, using the upper case letter. Different expectations then. For me a key is always just that key, if I also need to hold a modifier I expect that modifier to be also part of the visual hint. would not match what you are seeing, leading you to the assumption that you must hold the shift modifier to achieve the depict keystroke. Maybe you could file a feature request against Qt to allow toggle for people such as yours with a keyboard with lower case characters on their keycaps. So you think this is ultimately a Qt, rather than KDE, issue? Could depend on the style being used, but it could be something the Qt menu code does. The main reason I think this matters a bit is that it is relatively easy to hit A and think you are replying to all recipients if you don't check. That almost happend to me. Interesting. Whenever I hit the A key it does indeed invoke the I take it from the previous remarks that when you say hit the A key you mean using keystrokes that create a lowercase a. Indeed. That's what my A key does :) That works for me too. Hehe. What doesn't work is hitting keys (i.e., shift and A) the mean capital A. That does reply, rather than reply-all. Ah, Isee, you want Shift+A to trigger reply-all. You can set that as a replacement in KMail's shortcut configuration or even add it as a second shortcut if you want both. Cheers, Kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Sunday, May 05, 2013 02:17:43 PM Kevin Krammer wrote: On Sunday, 2013-05-05, Kevin Krammer wrote: On Sunday, 2013-05-05, Ross Boylan wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 Severity: normal From the top menu selecting message shows a list of commands including reply all. A is indicated as a shortcut. However, whether focus is on the message list or the message, A acts like a reply. Lowercase a does do a reply all. A in the menu refers to the A key, which produces the lower case a character. The uppercase A character is produced by a combination of (one of) the SHIFT keys and the A key, thus indicated as SHIFT+A in the menu if associated as the entry's shortcut. Either the listed shortcut key or the behavior should change so they are consistent. It already is. Menu shortcut visualizations always use capital characters, both for any modifier key as well as any character key. Sorry, I was partially incorrect here. The modifier is displayed in mixed case characters. Anyway, another very common shortcut, Ctrl + Q for Quit Application, is also always displayed with a capital Q, and does not refer to the combination of Ctrl + Shift + q Cheers, Kevin Are you saying it's a KDE standard to always use capital letters? That's quite confusing to me, since lower and upper case letters often do different things--in fact they do different things in KMail, as I found. The main reason I think this matters a bit is that it is relatively easy to hit A and think you are replying to all recipients if you don't check. That almost happend to me. Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305060917.56879.r...@biostat.ucsf.edu
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Monday, 2013-05-06, Ross Boylan wrote: Are you saying it's a KDE standard to always use capital letters? That's quite confusing to me, since lower and upper case letters often do different things--in fact they do different things in KMail, as I found. No, what I am saying is that, at least the default style's visual hint for keyboard shortcut uses the symbol on the key to mean the key and uses modifiers to mean that the key needs to be pressed while the depict combination of modifier keys are held. I am not aware of any keyboard that uses lowercase letters on its keycaps, but if course if you have such a keyboard that the visualization hint would not match what you are seeing, leading you to the assumption that you must hold the shift modifier to achieve the depict keystroke. Maybe you could file a feature request against Qt to allow toggle for people such as yours with a keyboard with lower case characters on their keycaps. The main reason I think this matters a bit is that it is relatively easy to hit A and think you are replying to all recipients if you don't check. That almost happend to me. Interesting. Whenever I hit the A key it does indeed invoke the reply-to-all functionality. But then of course all my keyboards have upper case characters depict in the keycaps so there was a direct visual similarity between the shortcut hint and the actual key. Cheers, Kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Monday, May 06, 2013 10:00:12 AM Kevin Krammer wrote: On Monday, 2013-05-06, Ross Boylan wrote: Are you saying it's a KDE standard to always use capital letters? That's quite confusing to me, since lower and upper case letters often do different things--in fact they do different things in KMail, as I found. No, what I am saying is that, at least the default style's visual hint for keyboard shortcut uses the symbol on the key to mean the key Since the symbol on the physical key is uppercase, that comes down to the same thing, i.e. display an uppercase letter when a lower case letter is meant. I may be particularly sensitive to this since I'm also using mutt, for which there are many cases in which lower and upper case differ, and both do something useful. I also use evolution, which of course is GNOME not KDE, and I don't remember any such issues there. I use T-bird on windows. I figured I try out KMail to how it is now. and uses modifiers to mean that the key needs to be pressed while the depict combination of modifier keys are held. I am not aware of any keyboard that uses lowercase letters on its keycaps, but if course if you have such a keyboard that the visualization hint That's not the issue. The issue is that an uppercase shortcut suggests, at least to me, using the upper case letter. would not match what you are seeing, leading you to the assumption that you must hold the shift modifier to achieve the depict keystroke. Maybe you could file a feature request against Qt to allow toggle for people such as yours with a keyboard with lower case characters on their keycaps. So you think this is ultimately a Qt, rather than KDE, issue? The main reason I think this matters a bit is that it is relatively easy to hit A and think you are replying to all recipients if you don't check. That almost happend to me. Interesting. Whenever I hit the A key it does indeed invoke the I take it from the previous remarks that when you say hit the A key you mean using keystrokes that create a lowercase a. That works for me too. What doesn't work is hitting keys (i.e., shift and A) the mean capital A. That does reply, rather than reply-all. reply-to-all functionality. But then of course all my keyboards have upper case characters depict in the keycaps so there was a direct visual similarity between the shortcut hint and the actual key. Cheers, Kevin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305061649.39876.r...@biostat.ucsf.edu
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
Package: kmail Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 Severity: normal From the top menu selecting message shows a list of commands including reply all. A is indicated as a shortcut. However, whether focus is on the message list or the message, A acts like a reply. Lowercase a does do a reply all. Either the listed shortcut key or the behavior should change so they are consistent. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kde-runtime 4:4.8.4-2 ii kdepim-runtime 4:4.4.11.1-6 ii kdepimlibs-kio-plugins 4:4.8.4-2 ii libakonadi-contact4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libakonadi-kde4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libc6 2.13-38 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5 ii libgpgme++2 4:4.8.4-2 ii libkabc44:4.8.4-2 ii libkcal44:4.8.4-2 ii libkcmutils44:4.8.4-4 ii libkde3support4 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkdecore5 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkdepim4 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libkdeui5 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkhtml5 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkimap4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libkio5 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkldap4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libkleo44:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libkmime4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkontactinterface44:4.8.4-2 ii libkparts4 4:4.8.4-4 ii libkpgp44:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libkpimidentities4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libkpimtextedit44:4.8.4-2 ii libkpimutils4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libkresources4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libksieve4 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libktnef4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libmailtransport4 4:4.8.4-2 ii libmessagecore4 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libmessagelist4 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libmimelib4 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 ii libnepomuk4 4:4.8.4-4 ii libphonon4 4:4.6.0.0-3 ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11 ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5 ii libthreadweaver44:4.8.4-4 ii perl5.14.2-21 ii phonon 4:4.6.0.0-3 Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii gnupg-agent 2.0.19-2 ii gnupg22.0.19-2 ii pinentry-gtk2 [pinentry-x11] 0.8.1-1 Versions of packages kmail suggests: pn clamav | f-prot-installer none ii kaddressbook 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 pn kleopatra none pn procmail none pn spamassassin | bogofilter | annoyance-filter | spamba none -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505193550.28123.67635.report...@tempserver.betterworld.us
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Sunday, 2013-05-05, Ross Boylan wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 Severity: normal From the top menu selecting message shows a list of commands including reply all. A is indicated as a shortcut. However, whether focus is on the message list or the message, A acts like a reply. Lowercase a does do a reply all. A in the menu refers to the A key, which produces the lower case a character. The uppercase A character is produced by a combination of (one of) the SHIFT keys and the A key, thus indicated as SHIFT+A in the menu if associated as the entry's shortcut. Either the listed shortcut key or the behavior should change so they are consistent. It already is. Menu shortcut visualizations always use capital characters, both for any modifier key as well as any character key. Cheers, Kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706882: kmail: A does not reply to all
On Sunday, 2013-05-05, Kevin Krammer wrote: On Sunday, 2013-05-05, Ross Boylan wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1 Severity: normal From the top menu selecting message shows a list of commands including reply all. A is indicated as a shortcut. However, whether focus is on the message list or the message, A acts like a reply. Lowercase a does do a reply all. A in the menu refers to the A key, which produces the lower case a character. The uppercase A character is produced by a combination of (one of) the SHIFT keys and the A key, thus indicated as SHIFT+A in the menu if associated as the entry's shortcut. Either the listed shortcut key or the behavior should change so they are consistent. It already is. Menu shortcut visualizations always use capital characters, both for any modifier key as well as any character key. Sorry, I was partially incorrect here. The modifier is displayed in mixed case characters. Anyway, another very common shortcut, Ctrl + Q for Quit Application, is also always displayed with a capital Q, and does not refer to the combination of Ctrl + Shift + q Cheers, Kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Reply
Hello, I had eairlier sent an official mail to your Mailing address on this matter without a reply. My name is Frank Mueller and i work in the acc ounts department at S.N.S Bank Netherl ands. I will like to discuss about a decea sed family member's Fina ncial portfolio at S.N.S Bank Netherlands. Respond back to me via email or phone call so that i can give you a comprehensive detail into this matter. Regards, Mr Frank Mueller 448715037032 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103030024.p22nmudw027...@mail.ucla.edu
Bug#257101: marked as done (reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:16:23 +0200 with message-id 201004221816.24127.ewoer...@kde.org and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #257101, regarding reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 257101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kmail Version: 4:3.2.2-2 Severity: minor When replying to a message that has both reply-to and mail-followup-to set, kmail takes mail-followup-to unconditionally. Please consider making this behavior configurable and/or to ask the user where to reply to. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-vash Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.2.2-1.0KDE I/O Slaves ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries ii ktnef 4:3.2.2-2 KDE TNEF viewer ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-2 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2 4:3.2.2-2 KDE calendaring library ii libkdenetwork24:3.2.2-2 KDE Network library ii libkdepim14:3.2.2-2 KDE PIM library ii libksieve04:3.2.2-2 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.2-2 KDE mime library ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 4:4.4.2-1 No response from the submitter for 4 weeks, closing. ---End Message---
Processed: Re: reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 257101 + moreinfo Bug #257101 [kmail] reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12694504160.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#564925: kmail doesn't quote mail after click on reply
Package: kmail Version: 4:4.3.4-1 Severity: normal Hi, on the message when I click on reply kmail doesn't quote the message. Thanks Pol -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28.7-luna (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.3.4-2 runtime components from the offici ii kdelibs5 4:4.3.4-1 core libraries for all KDE 4 appli ii kdepimlibs5 4:4.3.4-1 core libraries for KDE PIM 4 appli ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-8 GCC support library ii libkdepim44:4.3.4-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleo4 4:4.3.4-1 certificate based crypto library f ii libkontactinterfaces4 4:4.3.4-1 KDE Kontact interface library ii libkpgp4 4:4.3.4-1 gpg based crypto library for KDE ii libksieve44:4.3.4-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib4 4:4.3.4-1 KDE mime library ii libphonon44:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 Phonon module ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 D-Bus module ii libqt4-network4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 network module ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt ii libqt4-xml4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore44:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++64.4.2-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii perl 5.10.1-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii phonon4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 Phonon module metapackage Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-18Versatile e-mail processor Versions of packages kmail suggests: ii bogofilter1.2.0-1a fast Bayesian spam filter (dummy pn clamav | f-prot-installer none (no description available) ii gnupg 1.4.10-2 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii gnupg-agent 2.0.13-1 GNU privacy guard - password agent ii kaddressbook 4:4.3.4-1 KDE address book ii kleopatra 4:4.3.4-1 KDE Certificate Manager ii pinentry-qt [pinentry-x11]0.7.6-1+b1 Qt-3-based PIN or pass-phrase entr -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#550877: Reply
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 550877 kdebase-runtime Bug #550877 [systemsettings] systemsettings: Changing Default Window Manager restarts X unexpectedly (under LTSP) Bug reassigned from package 'systemsettings' to 'kdebase-runtime'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions kdebase-workspace/4:4.3.2-1. retitle 550877 componentchooser KCM shall not kill window manager not under KDE Bug #550877 [kdebase-runtime] systemsettings: Changing Default Window Manager restarts X unexpectedly (under LTSP) Changed Bug title to 'componentchooser KCM shall not kill window manager not under KDE' from 'systemsettings: Changing Default Window Manager restarts X unexpectedly (under LTSP)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550877: Reply
reassign 550877 kdebase-runtime retitle 550877 componentchooser KCM shall not kill window manager not under KDE thanks Hello, On antradienis 13 Spalis 2009 23:16:49 David Steiner wrote: It gave you a fat warning about a new window manager, you ignored it and now you complain with severity serious? It shouldn't have changed anything, but it did. It's not clear to assume start new window manager means kill the currently running one. Also there was no Cancel button, just an Ok. Well, then Cancel button would not hurt obviously. I put it on serious because that's how the debian bug tracker says: Can loose important data, like if I'm typing a long post in the browser, it would be lost, or an unsaved openoffice document. No big deal, change it to a normal bug. i haven't posted many bugs before. But following such a logic all Xorg crash bugs would be critical. That's not the case. systemsettings is a KDE configuration app. So it isn't being developed to work with other components? Seems reasonable, but kind of unintuitive when you use KDE apps outside. It changes KDE desktop or KDE application settings. That particular setting is of KDE desktop, it does not affect KDE applications (contrary to e.g. default browser). Again, why are messing with KDE systemsettings if you are not using KDE? i use konqueror, kmail and ktorrent. hence why i changed the Default Applications. Since you are not running KDE session manager, it cannot start window manager for you. That setting would start Openbox under KDE session though. However, this problem is mainly your own fault. You got what you wanted and frankly, I still don't understand what you intended to achieve changing that setting. i changed it because i didn't want to screw up the login process. it was set to KWin, so to be safe i put it to OpenBox. But it used to work like it was set before (i.e. KWin), didn't it? So golden rule - don't fix what ain't broken :D Killing window manager under KDE would not kill the whole session which is obviously not the case under Openbox. I still wonders me, why the window manager would get changed instantly. Isn't that the job of the Login Manager, KDM? Why not let the user select his window manager there? Then it wouldn't interfere with other login managers. Since KDE has a session manager, it can replace current window manager without terminating X session. So why wouldn't it? It's a feature and it is safe under KDE. However, I agree that it should not do that under non-KDE session since it might not be safe. -- Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#273732 closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 273...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kdebase removed from Debian)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 273732 Bug#273732: kdesktop and kdeeject have no manpages. 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 273732 kdebase-runtime Bug#273732: kdesktop and kdeeject have no manpages. Bug reassigned from package `kdesktop' to `kdebase-runtime'. found 273732 4:4.2.2-1 Bug#273732: kdesktop and kdeeject have no manpages. Bug marked as found in version 4:4.2.2-1. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#273732 closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 273...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kdebase removed from Debian)
reopen 273732 reassign 273732 kdebase-runtime found 273732 4:4.2.2-1 quit On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:18:42PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Version: 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-2+rm Hi, You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/273732 in the Debian BTS against the package kdebase. Debian has switched to KDE 4 in unstable and kdebase does not exist in KDE 4. Therefore, I am closing this bug as fixed in *unstable*. The bug will remain open for stable since it is shipping KDE 3.5. It is not fixed: kdebase-runtime still exist and include a lot of binaries without manpages: /usr/bin/kcmshell4 /usr/bin/kde-cp /usr/bin/kde-mv /usr/bin/kde-open /usr/bin/kde4 /usr/bin/kde4-menu /usr/bin/kfile4 /usr/bin/khotnewstuff4 /usr/bin/kiconfinder /usr/bin/kioclient /usr/bin/kmimetypefinder /usr/bin/knotify4 /usr/bin/kquitapp /usr/bin/ksvgtopng4 /usr/bin/ktraderclient /usr/bin/ktrash4 /usr/bin/kuiserver /usr/bin/kwalletd /usr/bin/nepomukserver /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub /usr/bin/solid-hardware Cheers, -- Bill. ballo...@debian.org Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#273732: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 273...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kdebase removed from Debian)
Bill, you know, that's kinda useless unless you actually provide manpages. We already have such lists through lintian reports on lintian.debian.org. Mraw, KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#273732: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 273...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kdebase removed from Debian)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:32:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Bill, you know, that's kinda useless unless you actually provide manpages. We already have such lists through lintian reports on lintian.debian.org. Well I reported this bug nearly five years ago and nothing has been done, and kde4 is used as a pretext to close it. The motivation for the bug is still there. Anyway, since the binary are probably documented somewhere, it should be possible to generate manpages automatically that point to the documentation. At least that would be a start. Cheers, -- Bill. ballo...@debian.org Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#494566: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 494...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kcontrol removed from Debian)
I'm not saying that my feature request is crucial, but it is stupid to close bugs just because you've bumped a version number and renamed a component. If the problem still exists (or in this case the feature is still absent) then the bug should be transferred. -- Ben Pearre http://ml.cs.colorado.edu/~ben PGP: CFDA6CDA Don't let Obama read your email!http://www.gnupg.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#494566: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 494...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kcontrol removed from Debian)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:29:18AM -0600, Ben Pearre wrote: I'm not saying that my feature request is crucial, but it is stupid to close bugs just because you've bumped a version number and renamed a component. If the problem still exists (or in this case the feature is still absent) then the bug should be transferred. Then check if the bug still really exists and then reassign it. If not, your claim is stupid. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#434697: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 434...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kcontrol removed from Debian)
I appreciate you probably have quite a lot of bugs like this to close, but if you read the bug report, you'd see that it applies equally to KDE 4, and you might check whether it has in fact been resolved. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | author, n. one who parades ignorance in public -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#434697: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 434...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kcontrol removed from Debian)
Hi Ruben, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:12:16PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: I appreciate you probably have quite a lot of bugs like this to close, but if you read the bug report, you'd see that it applies equally to KDE 4, and you might check whether it has in fact been resolved. I only have read the bug reports slighly and I am closing them semi-automatically expecting that users still interested in bugs still applying do this, but I realize now I should have added this info the template mail: You can reopen the bug, reassing to systemsettings and update the version. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#434697: closed by Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (reply to 434...@bugs.debian.org) (Package kcontrol removed from Debian)
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Ana Guerrero wrote: Hi Ruben, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:12:16PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: I appreciate you probably have quite a lot of bugs like this to close, but if you read the bug report, you'd see that it applies equally to KDE 4, and you might check whether it has in fact been resolved. I only have read the bug reports slighly and I am closing them semi-automatically expecting that users still interested in bugs still applying do this, but I realize now I should have added this info the template mail: You can reopen the bug, reassing to systemsettings and update the version. OK, installing systemsettings and checking shows that Konsole seems to be the default terminal. This is more sensible than xterm, but it still doesn't respect the Debian default, so I shall reopen the bug. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | perfect, a. dead -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Hi We are not going to document upgrade issues from 3.5.4 to 3.5.5 any more. Sorry for the inconvenience and for the processing time /Sune -- I cannot click the bus, how does it work? The point is that from Office XP and from Linux and from the panel menu inside iMac you must install on a clock for turning on a SMTP connection of a mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#397922: marked as done (kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.)
Your message dated Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:02:48 +0200 with message-id 200904191702.49555.deb...@pusling.com and subject line Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to. has caused the Debian Bug report #397922, regarding kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 397922: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397922 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting the r key caused kmail to do an ordanary reply to the address present in from or reply-to header. Hitting the l key did a controled list-reply. Now it seems like kmail also does a list-reply if I hit r and there is a list-post header present which might be surprising (or not). At least I'd like to have this change documented at a prominent position but I'd rather prefere have it as it used to be. When I want to do a list-reply I know best myself. so long Chris -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-skogtun-amd64 Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1 core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-3 core libraries and binaries for al ii kdepim-kio-plugins 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE pim I/O Slaves ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.8-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.2-20060709-1 GCC support library ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2b 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1a4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkmime2 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE MIME interface library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1c2a 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.2-20060709-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-16Versatile e-mail processor -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi We are not going to document upgrade issues from 3.5.4 to 3.5.5 any more. Sorry for the inconvenience and for the processing time /Sune -- Man, how to turn off a attachment? From the tools menu inside Flash MX XP you cannot overclock the graphic ISA mousepad for inserting in a button. ---End Message---
Bug#516361: Reply to this Email: sieme...@onlineclaimsdept.com
Your email ID has been awarded £750,000,00 GBP in our SIEMENS AWARD, Reply to the email above in your in subjuect with your information: Name: Country:. Sex:. Age/Tell Number:. Addres:... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516740: marked as done (libqt4-core: knode crashes whenever the Reply command is invoked)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:49:56 + with message-id e1lewag-00080x...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#516740: fixed in qt4-x11 4.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #516740, regarding libqt4-core: knode crashes whenever the Reply command is invoked to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 516740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516740 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libqt4-core Version: 4.5.0~rc1-2 Severity: serious knode crashes as soon as the Reply menu item (or 'R' key) is pressed, since today's upgrade to Qt 4.5.0~rc1. Program: Knode (knode), signal SIGSEGV 0x7f85f33efff1 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6 Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f85f61686f0 (LWP 2363)): [KCrash Handler] #5 0x7f85f3dbd6f7 in QTextEngine::atWordSeparator (this=0xb8dc20, position=0) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qstring.h:680 #6 0x7f85f3e15bb7 in QTextCursorPrivate::movePosition (this=0x12b7160, op=QTextCursor::EndOfWord, mode=QTextCursor::KeepAnchor) at text/qtextcursor.cpp:484 #7 0x7f85f3e1824a in QTextCursor::movePosition (this=0x7e2acb80, op=QTextCursor::EndOfWord, mode=QTextCursor::KeepAnchor, n=1) at text/qtextcursor.cpp:1187 #8 0x7f85f3e19480 in QTextCursor::select (this=0x7e2acb80, selection=QTextCursor::WordUnderCursor) at text/qtextcursor.cpp:1399 #9 0x7f85f4d31183 in KRichTextEditPrivate::mergeFormatOnWordOrSelection (this=0xb8f9f0, form...@0x7e2acbb0) at ../../kdeui/widgets/krichtextedit.cpp:104 #10 0x7f85f4d314d9 in KRichTextEdit::setFont (this=0xb889c0, fo...@0x7e2acbe0) at ../../kdeui/widgets/krichtextedit.cpp:271 #11 0x7f85f56334dd in KNComposer::setConfig (this=0x9a1770, onlyFonts=value optimized out) at ../../knode/kncomposer.cpp:579 #12 0x7f85f563638a in KNComposer (this=0x9a1770, a=value optimized out, te...@0x7e2ad720, sig=value optimized out, unwraped=value optimized out, firstEdit=true, dislikesCopies=false, createCopy=false, allowMail=value optimized out) at ../../knode/kncomposer.cpp:392 #13 0x7f85f564492a in KNArticleFactory::createReply (this=0xa3c120, a=value optimized out, selectedte...@0x7e2adc20, post=true, mail=value optimized out) at ../../knode/knarticlefactory.cpp:272 #14 0x7f85f5675120 in KNode::ArticleWidget::slotReply (this=value optimized out) at ../../knode/articlewidget.cpp:1306 #15 0x7f85f5680fdd in KNode::ArticleWidget::qt_metacall (this=0x8059a0, _c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=value optimized out, _a=0x7e2add60) at ./articlewidget.moc:135 #16 0x7f85f4753592 in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0x8dad20, from_signal_index=value optimized out, to_signal_index=6, argv=0x10) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3064 #17 0x7f85f3b806d7 in QAction::triggered (this=0xb8dc20, _t1=false) at .moc/release-shared/moc_qaction.cpp:236 #18 0x7f85f3b81b50 in QAction::activate (this=0x8dad20, event=value optimized out) at kernel/qaction.cpp:1155 #19 0x7f85f3b84667 in QAction::event (this=0xb8dc20, e=value optimized out) at kernel/qaction.cpp:1074 #20 0x7f85f4b82c23 in KAction::event (this=0xb8dc20, event=0x7e2ae2e0) at ../../kdeui/actions/kaction.cpp:88 #21 0x7f85f3b8666d in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=0x6276f0, receiver=0x8dad20, e=0x7e2ae2e0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4051 #22 0x7f85f3b8e85a in QApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x8dad20, e=0x7e2ae2e0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4016 #23 0x7f85f4c53fab in KApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x8dad20, event=0x7e2ae2e0) at ../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:307 #24 0x7f85f473dbbc in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x8dad20, event=0x7e2ae2e0) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:597 #25 0x7f85f3bbbf0d in QShortcutMap::dispatchEvent (this=value optimized out, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:208 #26 0x7f85f3bbdd6c in QShortcutMap::tryShortcutEvent (this=0x627808, o=value optimized out, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at kernel/qshortcutmap.cpp:364 #27 0x7f85f3b8f861 in QApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x9f5660, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:3640 #28 0x7f85f4c53fab in KApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x9f5660, event=0x7e2ae7d0) at ../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:307 #29 0x7f85f473dbbc in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x9f5660, event=0x7e2ae7d0) at kernel
Bug#516740: libqt4-core: knode crashes whenever the Reply command is invoked
Package: libqt4-core
Version: 4.5.0~rc1-2
Severity: serious
knode crashes as soon as the Reply menu item (or 'R' key) is pressed,
since today's upgrade to Qt 4.5.0~rc1.
Program: Knode (knode), signal SIGSEGV
0x7f85f33efff1 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f85f61686f0 (LWP 2363)):
[KCrash Handler]
#5 0x7f85f3dbd6f7 in QTextEngine::atWordSeparator (this=0xb8dc20,
position=0) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qstring.h:680
#6 0x7f85f3e15bb7 in QTextCursorPrivate::movePosition (this=0x12b7160,
op=QTextCursor::EndOfWord, mode=QTextCursor::KeepAnchor) at
text/qtextcursor.cpp:484
#7 0x7f85f3e1824a in QTextCursor::movePosition (this=0x7e2acb80,
op=QTextCursor::EndOfWord, mode=QTextCursor::KeepAnchor, n=1) at
text/qtextcursor.cpp:1187
#8 0x7f85f3e19480 in QTextCursor::select (this=0x7e2acb80,
selection=QTextCursor::WordUnderCursor) at text/qtextcursor.cpp:1399
#9 0x7f85f4d31183 in KRichTextEditPrivate::mergeFormatOnWordOrSelection
(this=0xb8f9f0, form...@0x7e2acbb0) at
../../kdeui/widgets/krichtextedit.cpp:104
#10 0x7f85f4d314d9 in KRichTextEdit::setFont (this=0xb889c0,
fo...@0x7e2acbe0) at ../../kdeui/widgets/krichtextedit.cpp:271
#11 0x7f85f56334dd in KNComposer::setConfig (this=0x9a1770,
onlyFonts=value optimized out) at ../../knode/kncomposer.cpp:579
#12 0x7f85f563638a in KNComposer (this=0x9a1770, a=value optimized out,
te...@0x7e2ad720, sig=value optimized out, unwraped=value optimized
out, firstEdit=true, dislikesCopies=false,
createCopy=false, allowMail=value optimized out) at
../../knode/kncomposer.cpp:392
#13 0x7f85f564492a in KNArticleFactory::createReply (this=0xa3c120,
a=value optimized out, selectedte...@0x7e2adc20, post=true, mail=value
optimized out)
at ../../knode/knarticlefactory.cpp:272
#14 0x7f85f5675120 in KNode::ArticleWidget::slotReply (this=value
optimized out) at ../../knode/articlewidget.cpp:1306
#15 0x7f85f5680fdd in KNode::ArticleWidget::qt_metacall (this=0x8059a0,
_c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=value optimized out, _a=0x7e2add60)
at ./articlewidget.moc:135
#16 0x7f85f4753592 in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0x8dad20,
from_signal_index=value optimized out, to_signal_index=6, argv=0x10) at
kernel/qobject.cpp:3064
#17 0x7f85f3b806d7 in QAction::triggered (this=0xb8dc20, _t1=false) at
.moc/release-shared/moc_qaction.cpp:236
#18 0x7f85f3b81b50 in QAction::activate (this=0x8dad20, event=value
optimized out) at kernel/qaction.cpp:1155
#19 0x7f85f3b84667 in QAction::event (this=0xb8dc20, e=value optimized
out) at kernel/qaction.cpp:1074
#20 0x7f85f4b82c23 in KAction::event (this=0xb8dc20, event=0x7e2ae2e0)
at ../../kdeui/actions/kaction.cpp:88
#21 0x7f85f3b8666d in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=0x6276f0,
receiver=0x8dad20, e=0x7e2ae2e0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4051
#22 0x7f85f3b8e85a in QApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910,
receiver=0x8dad20, e=0x7e2ae2e0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4016
#23 0x7f85f4c53fab in KApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910,
receiver=0x8dad20, event=0x7e2ae2e0) at
../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:307
#24 0x7f85f473dbbc in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal
(this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x8dad20, event=0x7e2ae2e0) at
kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:597
#25 0x7f85f3bbbf0d in QShortcutMap::dispatchEvent (this=value optimized
out, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at
../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:208
#26 0x7f85f3bbdd6c in QShortcutMap::tryShortcutEvent (this=0x627808,
o=value optimized out, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at kernel/qshortcutmap.cpp:364
#27 0x7f85f3b8f861 in QApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910,
receiver=0x9f5660, e=0x7e2ae7d0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:3640
#28 0x7f85f4c53fab in KApplication::notify (this=0x7e2af910,
receiver=0x9f5660, event=0x7e2ae7d0) at
../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:307
#29 0x7f85f473dbbc in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal
(this=0x7e2af910, receiver=0x9f5660, event=0x7e2ae7d0) at
kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:597
#30 0x7f85f3c1b1d4 in QKeyMapper::sendKeyEvent (keyWidget=0x9f5660,
grab=value optimized out, type=QEvent::KeyPress, code=82, modifiers={i =
-30741248}, te...@0x7e2aecf0, autorepeat=false,
count=1, nativeScanCode=27, nativeVirtualKey=114, nativeModifiers=0) at
kernel/qkeymapper_x11.cpp:1669
#31 0x7f85f3c1d500 in QKeyMapperPrivate::translateKeyEvent (this=0x67c3a0,
keyWidget=0x9f5660, event=0x7e2af590, grab=false) at
kernel/qkeymapper_x11.cpp:1640
#32 0x7f85f3bf63fd in QApplication::x11ProcessEvent (this=0x7e2af910,
event=0x7e2af590) at kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp:3425
#33 0x7f85f3c1ef24 in x11EventSourceDispatch (s=0x62a8a0, callback=0,
user_data=0x0) at kernel/qguieventdispatcher_glib.cpp:141
#34 0x7f85ed4b8afb in g_main_context_dispatch () from
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35
Kmail reply fails to quote
Hi im using kde 4.2.00 with kmail 1.11.0 package: 4:4.2.0-0r1 In reply to sender preferences i have the option %QUOTE but it doesnt seem to work. Any idea? Nico
Re: Kmail reply fails to quote
You see: it works for me ... %QUOTE is not enough. There are several templates (sorry I have german KMail) You have to look INTO all relevant templates. You also have to check intelligent qouting (or so) HTH Hi im using kde 4.2.00 with kmail 1.11.0 package: 4:4.2.0-0r1 In reply to sender preferences i have the option %QUOTE but it doesnt seem to work. Any idea? Nico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Kmail reply fails to quote
I found the problem, it was a problem in the identity's settings. For some reason the configuration changed (maybe an update) and enabled the personal template. thanks :). Nico. On Mar 27 Ene 2009 17:22:23 anna escribió: You see: it works for me ... %QUOTE is not enough. There are several templates (sorry I have german KMail) You have to look INTO all relevant templates. You also have to check intelligent qouting (or so) HTH
Bug#397635: marked as done (kmail: reply fails when original sender address contains umlaut AND comma)
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:32:26 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#397635: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #397635, regarding kmail: reply fails when original sender address contains umlaut AND comma to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 397635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397635 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** When replying to a mail that has an original sender name that contains an umlaut AND a comma, the recipients of the newly generated mail is broken into two parts. example: sender-address Braun, Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets broken to Braun Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] in two separate To: Fields. That leads to an email that is send to Jürgen at the right address and to Braun with an incorrect Mail-Address. When the name doesn't contain an umlaut, everything is fine When the name contains an umlaut but doesn't contain a comma, everything works fine too. The problem only exist if the Name contains an umlaut AND a comma. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-jb Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.5a-2core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-2 core libraries and binaries for al ii kdepim-kio-plugins 4:3.5.5-1 KDE pim I/O Slaves ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.8-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.1.1-19GCC support library ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2b 4:3.5.5-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1a4:3.5.5-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra1 4:3.5.5-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkmime2 4:3.5.5-1 KDE MIME interface library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.5.5-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.5.5-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1c2a 4:3.5.5-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-16Versatile e-mail processor -- no debconf information -- Freundliche Gruesse Juergen Braun Senior System Consultant IQDoQ GmbH Document Management Company of MATERNA Theodor-Heuss-Strasse 59 * 61118 Bad Vilbel * Germany phone: +49 6101 806 223 * fax: +49 6101 806 590 mobile: +49 175 2624437 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iqdoq.com * http://www.iqdoq.de ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: kdepim Source
Re: Should reply to list be default
Am Donnerstag 08 November 2007 schrieb Curt Howland: Hi Curt, Reply to the list is default for me, in Kmail. In fact, no matter which of the reply options in Kmail that I use, it always chooses the list for the reply address. I have to copy/paste the senders address by hand if I want to use it. Not for me. If I choose reply to sender on your mail KMail inserts your email address into the To field. Standard reply as well as reply to list goes to list instead. Reply to all goes to list and your personal email address. So it works as intended here. I used KMail mailinglist auto detection to get those settings for the folder containing the mailing list mails. Regards, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Should reply to list be default
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:46:27 -0500, Henry keultjes wrote: Just noticed that Reply goes to the author, rather than to the list. Should not the default be to reply to the list? Actually, reply-to-list should be a feature of your email program: http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should reply to list be default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 08 November 2007, Henry keultjes was heard to say: Just noticed that Reply goes to the author, rather than to the list. Should not the default be to reply to the list? Henry Keultjes Mansfield Ohio USA Reply to the list is default for me, in Kmail. In fact, no matter which of the reply options in Kmail that I use, it always chooses the list for the reply address. I have to copy/paste the senders address by hand if I want to use it. Here, let's check the headers... Nope, no Reply-to specified. Curt- - -- September 11th, 2001 The proudest day for gun control and central planning advocates in American history -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRzMslS9Y35yItIgBAQJeQwf9HOjAT1Q5PO2zunWaSJNP0Cxk6TztT7A9 6fAH26YfX3ysnnPrd08GxbHkSCXvyDMDMDrR5sEiiw9A6XEF7CZwAr8vwrx+PLcx RM7rDHx+C++NfEgcwEkcdzu5nEZbKUdH7NxCGbShVhbtuHcOvPSJ1AyGRLR4klZZ EG7iyma9Uw3XP9xgrwIC6o5FnfySPJOsD493Hr0+4IdZbf1t6wwKc+XYu1zPkm9v zq/CzPXpUwRjIHkpsd4FuWT6vHiRp2ynB90Ko/LkygQxlzlgLkWoD6fU2ZN7ZlrB wcFlW7FEqMdaHs+Zsd+BRRgC4J0ZBt5Bmko6/az9g8am6FlBYa4xGg== =fBGs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should reply to list be default
Just noticed that Reply goes to the author, rather than to the list. Should not the default be to reply to the list? Henry Keultjes Mansfield Ohio USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 21:02 schrieb Kevin Krammer: The reply-to is not set. I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present which would be even more confusing... Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do you remember which version still worked the way you expected? Well I would have said the last 3.5.4 but that's not true as I just checked. My wife uses still 3.5.2(1.9.1) which already behaves like 3.5.5(1.9.5). Perhaps someone could check with the sarge version just to be sure. so long Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting the r key caused kmail to do an ordanary reply to the address present in from or reply-to header. Hitting the l key did a controled list-reply. Now it seems like kmail also does a list-reply if I hit r and there is a list-post header present which might be surprising (or not). At least I'd like to have this change documented at a prominent position but I'd rather prefere have it as it used to be. When I want to do a list-reply I know best myself. so long Chris -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-skogtun-amd64 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1 core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-3 core libraries and binaries for al ii kdepim-kio-plugins 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE pim I/O Slaves ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.8-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.2-20060709-1 GCC support library ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2b 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1a4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkmime2 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE MIME interface library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1c2a 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.2-20060709-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-16Versatile e-mail processor -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
On Friday 10 November 2006 14:23, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting the r key caused kmail to do an ordanary reply to the address present in from or reply-to header. Hitting the l key did a controled list-reply. Now it seems like kmail also does a list-reply if I hit r and there is a list-post header present which might be surprising (or not). I just tested this with the mail your report generated on the debian-qt-kde mailinglist. Pressing'r' creates this very mail, i.e. two addresses (you and the bugreport). Pressing 'l' generates a mail to the list. Same package version. Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? Cheers, Kevin pgpQ4jpGy28SS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: I just tested this with the mail your report generated on the debian-qt-kde mailinglist. Pressing'r' creates this very mail, i.e. two addresses (you and the bugreport). Well I can't comment this as I don't have the headers. Pressing 'l' generates a mail to the list. thats working here perfectly as well. Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with e.g. debian-user-german. Sample headers below: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:30:17 +0100 Received-SPF: none (mxeu14: 70.103.162.31 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.debian.org) client-ip=70.103.162.31; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=murphy.debian.org; Received: from [70.103.162.31] (helo=murphy.debian.org) by mx.kundenserver.de (node=mxeu14) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML3Dg-1Gib8q3YaO-0006Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:30:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id A3F172E80B; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:13 -0600 (CST) Old-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Original-To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org Received: from ares.dyndns.biz (d014235.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.14.235]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1992E6F1 for debian-user-german@lists.debian.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (nova [10.0.0.2]) by ares.dyndns.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0C5B83D for debian-user-german@lists.debian.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:30:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:33:50 +0100 From: Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org Subject: debian auf neuer Partition und Partition check Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rc-Virus: 2006-10-25_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2006-04-09_01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,IMPRONONCABLE_1, LDOSUBSCRIBER,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org archive/latest/192581 X-Loop: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org List-Id: debian-user-german.lists.debian.org List-Post: mailto:debian-user-german@lists.debian.org List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:13 -0600 (CST) Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: R X-Status: NC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: so long Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
On Friday 10 November 2006 20:16, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with e.g. debian-user-german. Sample headers below: [snipped headers] The reply-to is not set. I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do you remember which version still worked the way you expected? Cheers, Kevin pgpGT6ncrwKwi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#397635: kmail: reply fails when original sender address contains umlaut AND comma
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** When replying to a mail that has an original sender name that contains an umlaut AND a comma, the recipients of the newly generated mail is broken into two parts. example: sender-address Braun, Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets broken to Braun Jürgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] in two separate To: Fields. That leads to an email that is send to Jürgen at the right address and to Braun with an incorrect Mail-Address. When the name doesn't contain an umlaut, everything is fine When the name contains an umlaut but doesn't contain a comma, everything works fine too. The problem only exist if the Name contains an umlaut AND a comma. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-jb Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.5a-2core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-2 core libraries and binaries for al ii kdepim-kio-plugins 4:3.5.5-1 KDE pim I/O Slaves ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.8-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.1.1-19GCC support library ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2b 4:3.5.5-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1a4:3.5.5-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra1 4:3.5.5-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkmime2 4:3.5.5-1 KDE MIME interface library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.5.5-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.5.5-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1c2a 4:3.5.5-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-16Versatile e-mail processor -- no debconf information -- Freundliche Gruesse Juergen Braun Senior System Consultant IQDoQ GmbH Document Management Company of MATERNA Theodor-Heuss-Strasse 59 * 61118 Bad Vilbel * Germany phone: +49 6101 806 223 * fax: +49 6101 806 590 mobile: +49 175 2624437 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iqdoq.com * http://www.iqdoq.de
Bug#388377: closed by Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (kdepim upgrade resolved problem)
Unfortunateley I had another crash today, so the upgrade didn't solve the problem. Can you please reopen the bug? Can I provide anymore information? I didn't succeed trying to get useful information from a debugger, any hints? best regards, tom Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 21:04 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #388377: kontact: System often hangs (!) after opening 'New Mail' window, which was filed against the kontact package. It has been closed by Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Religion keeps the poor from murdering the rich. -- Napoleon Bonaparte -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto Reply
Thank you for your interest in employment opportunities with Sharp Laboratories of America. We are currently in the process of reviewing your resume. Should your qualifications match our staffing needs, we will contact you. Once again, thank you for considering a career with Sharp. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385194: closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Re: Bug#385194: kdebase source is missing debian/debian-kde_default.png)
What version did 'apt-get source kdebase' get you? For me it gets: Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (dsc) [1810B] Get:2 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (tar) [28.2MB] Get:3 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (diff) [1789kB] And when unpacked ' grep -r debian-kde_default debian/*' finds several references to the file, but 'ls debian/debian-kde_default.png' finds nothing. On Wednesday 30 August 2006 17:04, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #385194: kdebase source is missing debian/debian-kde_default.png, which was filed against the kdebase package. It has been closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385194: closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Re: Bug#385194: kdebase source is missing debian/debian-kde_default.png)
Hi, The file is uuencoded in 21_default_background_image.diff.uu, so when the build process applies the patches, the file is created. So it is present to be copied into the .debs when they're built. Cheers, Christopher Martin On Wednesday 30 August 2006 20:29, Sean Meiners wrote: What version did 'apt-get source kdebase' get you? For me it gets: Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (dsc) [1810B] Get:2 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (tar) [28.2MB] Get:3 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (diff) [1789kB] And when unpacked ' grep -r debian-kde_default debian/*' finds several references to the file, but 'ls debian/debian-kde_default.png' finds nothing. On Wednesday 30 August 2006 17:04, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #385194: kdebase source is missing debian/debian-kde_default.png, which was filed against the kdebase package. It has been closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Repost-No Reply-Fwd: MPlayer Wont Work Under Sid-2.6.16-1-686
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:03:21AM -0700, Leonard Chatagnier wrote: Reposting because need help and haven't gotten a response. Thanks for any help. Yahoo video player wont play with a greyed out screen coming up during the last stages of loading. A greyed out screen appears with teal green double cross that gives the following message upon clicking it: This application contains information of the type(application/x-mplayer2) that can only be viewed with the appropriate plug-in. The title bar above the message is X Default Plugin My Mozilla about plug-ins show that mime type application/x-mplayer2 is enabled with suffix *. I'm sure that I'm If this is for following links under KDE, check what programs are associated with application/x-mplayer2. KDE may not be calling Mozilla plugins at all. Sorry for delay; was expecting email response. Now, I don't have a listing for application/x-mplayer2 in control centerfile associations-did but it's now gone. Also not listed under video. It was associated with kmplayer before it vanished. Probably didn't have anything associted with the embedded tab. Go in to menu Konqueror - Configure - File Associations (I don't know the French names I'm afraid). Open the tree for 'applications' and scroll down a long way to application/x-mplayer2. French? I'm native born American-just the sir name is french. Couldn't follow above. Opened konquerorsettingsconfigure konqueror and followed instruction there on. Originally it was listed, but not now, and followed instructions below to add the netscape plugin. This didn't allow Mozilla browser to play the videos with mplauerplug-in but did prevent konqueror and foxfire browsers from playing the videos which prior to the change played them defaulting to kaffeine player. If application/x-mplayer2 isn't in the list, then click on Add and add x-mplayer2 as a type to the 'application' group, then click on it and open the two tabs as below. Was there; not now. Will have to add again and start over. BTW, using file extensions from konqueror the same as using kde control center? But hopefully it will be there and you just have to change the associations ! Click on that entry and you'll see two tabs, General for opening links in a new window and Embedding for including them as OBJECT etc inside a web page. Click on the Embedding tab, and if you see 'nspluginviewer' or 'Netscape plugin viewer' then highlight it and Move Up to the top. Did this originally and it stopped video playing on all 3 browsers. Since then I used kde control center file assoc to change file assoc. on all related media types to use kmplayer with embedded set to kde kmplayer and netscape player second. Did this because mplayerplug-in was the only thing that would play all types of media files in the past. This got firefox to play again and konqueror to play one time when I selected kmplayer from the settings menu. Now have added x-mplayer back into applications and added the embedded netscape player and now get an Java Script Error-Konqueror that says: An error occured while attempting to run a script on this page. http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16598m=49750cl-52...line 4201: ReferenceError: Can't find variable: bs. The message has a debug and ok buttom. Hitting debug yields: global code at the above URI with this line highlighted: window.status = currentDoc.bufferCount Not familiar with debuging tools so selected continue from menu and get another error: saying: An error occurred while attempting to run a script on this page. Parse error at http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/detectomatic/sniffer.vbs line 3. Clicked ok, then another error with only sniffer part changed to sniffer.js line 230 ReferenceError: Can't fine variable: activexenabled. Clicking the debug button again shows Call stack anonymous function at uri above and this.activeX - acticexenabled(). And it goes on and on until I hit abort. If it's not there then you have to Add it and then move it to the top. Did it. When this is all done, check at the top of the embedding tab that it's set to Show file in embedded viewer. Finally press OK and it should be done. Did it. Hope this gets you somewhere, it's worth checking. Hope you can stay with me on this because I'm really confused now. Nick Leonard Chatagnier ** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Repost-No Reply-Fwd: MPlayer Wont Work Under Sid-2.6.16-1-686
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:03:21AM -0700, Leonard Chatagnier wrote: Reposting because need help and haven't gotten a response. Thanks for any help. Yahoo video player wont play with a greyed out screen coming up during the last stages of loading. A greyed out screen appears with teal green double cross that gives the following message upon clicking it: This application contains information of the type(application/x-mplayer2) that can only be viewed with the appropriate plug-in. The title bar above the message is X Default Plugin My Mozilla about plug-ins show that mime type application/x-mplayer2 is enabled with suffix *. I'm sure that I'm If this is for following links under KDE, check what programs are associated with application/x-mplayer2. KDE may not be calling Mozilla plugins at all. Go in to menu Konqueror - Configure - File Associations (I don't know the French names I'm afraid). Open the tree for 'applications' and scroll down a long way to application/x-mplayer2. If application/x-mplayer2 isn't in the list, then click on Add and add x-mplayer2 as a type to the 'application' group, then click on it and open the two tabs as below. But hopefully it will be there and you just have to change the associations ! Click on that entry and you'll see two tabs, General for opening links in a new window and Embedding for including them as OBJECT etc inside a web page. Click on the Embedding tab, and if you see 'nspluginviewer' or 'Netscape plugin viewer' then highlight it and Move Up to the top. If it's not there then you have to Add it and then move it to the top. When this is all done, check at the top of the embedding tab that it's set to Show file in embedded viewer. Finally press OK and it should be done. Hope this gets you somewhere, it's worth checking. Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361366: kopete: irc: Unknown IRC numeric reply [..] 432 * DavidS/kop :Erroneous Nickname
Package: kopete Version: 4:3.5.2-1 Severity: normal Hi! kopete's IRC plugin cannot handle the Erroneous Nickname error message from oftc.net: kopete (irc): WARNING: Unknown IRC numeric reply for line::nobelium.oftc.net 432 * DavidS/kop :Erroneous Nickname Thank you for your time and work! Regards, David PS: please add irc.oftc.net to the default list of irc servers. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-vserver-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kopete depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.2-2core libraries for all KDE applica ii libacl1 2.2.36-1 Access control list shared library ii libart-2.0-22.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libattr12.4.32-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libaudio2 1.7-6The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0 2.7.0-9 Client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-5.1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.1.10-3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgadu31:1.6+20060215-1 Gadu-Gadu protocol library - runti ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-1GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.10.1-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn110.5.18-2 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-12The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libmeanwhile1 1.0.2-2 open implementation of the Lotus S ii libpcre36.4-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5.1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.6-1Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-5.1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama16.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display ii libxml2 2.6.23.dfsg.2-3 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxslt1.1 1.1.15-5 XSLT processing library - runtime ii libxss1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Screen Saver client-side library ii libxt6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages kopete recommends: ii qca-tls 1.0-3 TLS plugin for the Qt Cryptographi -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221442: Two months: no update, no reply
Where can I go to read/find out about the present status of KMail? I have not heard anything about this bug for over two months. Thanks. Chris Horn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221442: Two months: no update, no reply
El Lunes, 22 de Agosto de 2005 23:03, Chris Horn escribió: Where can I go to read/find out about the present status of KMail? I have not heard anything about this bug for over two months. The original report was about a problem with the IMAP account. I never had a problem with this kind of account, but I suppose is related to the synchronous-filtering problem. Getting a faster client / server, bigger bandwith, and having patience while the GUI seems frozen, helps. My recommendation: Switch to disconnected IMAP, because is the recommended kind of account for IMAP, and the filtering works better. And no, saying in the bugreport 'The Disconnected IMAP account type does not work AT ALL for me', doesn't help. :) Just ask in debian-kde or kdepim-users if you have problems setting up the account, but I can promise you that it works. -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://darkshines.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#268879: marked as done (Messaging a contact (ICQ) brings up an empty reply to box)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 09:53:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#268879: Acknowledgement (Messaging a contact (ICQ) brings up an empty reply to box) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2004 16:18:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 29 09:18:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jem.yoyo.org [193.110.91.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C1SOA-0008Bg-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:18:42 -0700 Received: from levine by jem.yoyo.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C1SO7-000787-Ay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:18:39 +0100 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:18:39 +0100 From: Neil Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Messaging a contact (ICQ) brings up an empty reply to box Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Neil Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kopete Version: 3.2.3-1 In 'classic' ICQ mode, when a message comes in, I click on it it to read it. If I then close the window instead of clicking on the reply button, then immediatley click on the contact to send him a message after $some_time, I get an empty window with reply highlighted in the bottom right and a Next button to its left, which when clicked proceeds to show $some_large_number of empty messages again. The main text entry window does not accept input. I have the History input plugin enabled but this happens with it enabled or without. N -- -- Neil Levine http://www.yoyo.org -- --- Received: (at 268879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2004 08:53:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 06 01:53:44 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jem.yoyo.org [193.110.91.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C4FFw-0005Z5-00; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 01:53:44 -0700 Received: from levine by jem.yoyo.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C4FFu-0002FV-HD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 09:53:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 09:53:42 +0100 From: Neil Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#268879: Acknowledgement (Messaging a contact (ICQ) brings up an empty reply to box) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:33:03AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a ecrit: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. This bug is now fixed in the latest version. -- -- Neil Levine http://www.yoyo.org --
Bug#268879: Messaging a contact (ICQ) brings up an empty reply to box
Package: kopete Version: 3.2.3-1 In 'classic' ICQ mode, when a message comes in, I click on it it to read it. If I then close the window instead of clicking on the reply button, then immediatley click on the contact to send him a message after $some_time, I get an empty window with reply highlighted in the bottom right and a Next button to its left, which when clicked proceeds to show $some_large_number of empty messages again. The main text entry window does not accept input. I have the History input plugin enabled but this happens with it enabled or without. N -- -- Neil Levine http://www.yoyo.org --
Auto reply message: Casino Support cannot except email attachments
This message is automatically generated by the Casino Support messaging system. As an increased security measure and a further protection against viruses, the Casino Support team no longer accepts emails containing attachments. You may still send us text only emails - without attachments - to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should you wish to send an email containing an attachment, we kindly ask that you resend your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To ensure successful receipt of your email, please send your email from the email account which you have registered at the casino. We apologize for any inconvenience caused and would like to thank you for your co-operation. Kind Regards, Casino Rewards Support
Bug#257101: reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:34:09PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: When replying to a message that has both reply-to and mail-followup-to set, kmail takes mail-followup-to unconditionally. Please consider making this behavior configurable and/or to ask the user where to reply to. FWIW, I though the expected behaviour was to use reply-to for reply to sender and mail-followup-to for reply to all. Does it use mail-followup-to for both reply to sender and reply to all? Or just for reply to all (which AIUI is correct behaviour)? Plain reply uses M-F-T, Reply to author uses R-T, Reply to all uses both, and Reply to Mailing List uses m-f-t as well. I find this mildly confusing, but however other people might and will think different. Please have the behavior configurable. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Karlsruhe, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Bug#257101: reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.2.2-2 Severity: minor When replying to a message that has both reply-to and mail-followup-to set, kmail takes mail-followup-to unconditionally. Please consider making this behavior configurable and/or to ask the user where to reply to. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-vash Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.2.2-1.0KDE I/O Slaves ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries ii ktnef 4:3.2.2-2 KDE TNEF viewer ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-2 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2 4:3.2.2-2 KDE calendaring library ii libkdenetwork24:3.2.2-2 KDE Network library ii libkdepim14:3.2.2-2 KDE PIM library ii libksieve04:3.2.2-2 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.2-2 KDE mime library ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
Bug#257101: reply-to is ignored if mail-followup-to is set
Hi. When replying to a message that has both reply-to and mail-followup-to set, kmail takes mail-followup-to unconditionally. Please consider making this behavior configurable and/or to ask the user where to reply to. FWIW, I though the expected behaviour was to use reply-to for reply to sender and mail-followup-to for reply to all. Does it use mail-followup-to for both reply to sender and reply to all? Or just for reply to all (which AIUI is correct behaviour)? b.
[KMail 1.6] 'Reply' does not fill To: address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I am running into a problem when I try to reply to an email generated from a HTML-form (cgiemail). The To: address is not copied from the From: address in the original mail (in other words - the To: address is left blank). The same problem also occurs when I add a Reply-To: header in the original mail. (In M$ Outlook the address is copied correctly.) Does anybody have an idea what could cause this? The full message source is attached below (most text is in Dutch but should not be relevant). TIA. = MESSAGE SOURCE START = Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from reaktie22.xlserver.net ([216.71.84.185]) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AvOQ7-0001Rx-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:19:23 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by reaktie22.xlserver.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i1NMIqX02754; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:18:52 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:18:52 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl by www.ijhw.nl with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:18:52 CET X-Mailer: cgiemail 1.6 (form=http://www.ijhw.nl/RIJ/rij_open.html;) (action=/cgi-bin/cgiemail/RIJ/cgiemail/rij_open.txt) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Inschrijving RIJ 2004 - NED 1234 - F.J. Pop Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: Uw inschrijving is ontvangen. Uw betaling van onderstaand bedrag wordt voor 5 mei verwacht op bankrekening 67.15.81.724 van W.S.V. Bestevaer te Medemblik. Indien dit niet (meer) mogelijk is, graag betaling contant aan het wedstrijdbureau. EIGENAAR/SCHIPPER F.J. Pop Westereiland 89 1671HZ Medemblik Tel: ; E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lid van vereniging: Bestevaer BEMANNING BOOT - Open catamaran NED 1234, TESTBOOT Klasse: Hobie 16 Texel rating: 123.23 Spinnaker: met RESERVERINGEN Buffet 17 mei: 2 personen Trainingsdag 16 mei: 0 personen KOSTEN Inschrijfgeld: EUR 40 Reserveringen buffet: EUR 24 Trainingsdag: EUR 0 Totale kosten: EUR 64 Datum: 23 februari 2004 Naam: F.J. Pop = MESSAGE SOURCE END = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAOoD+gm/Kwh6ICoQRAmhfAKDDJFKvjcWQP501Dsy/s/XMiZXDDACgiRIW 9tkVY+FFZDwQ2SjHt6idURo= =/YNC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Reply on your mail
[English version follows Dutch text] DIT IS EEN AUTOMATISCH ANTWOORD Dank u voor het inlichten van [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Wij bevestigen hierbij dat uw mail is ontvangen. Merk op dat het goed mogelijk is dat u geen persoonlijk antwoord van ons ontvangt, maar alle meldingen zullen zorgvuldig onderzocht worden, mits ze goed gedocumenteerd zijn. Om meldingen goed te kunnen onderzoeken, hebben wij alle beschikbare informatie nodig. Als u dit niet al gedaan hebt, stuurt u ons dan alsnog alle informatie toe. Alleen op deze manier is het voor ons mogelijk een zaak goed te onderzoeken. In het geval van portscans of hackpogingen, gelieve ons zoveel mogelijk informatie te sturen, zoals de relevante stukken logfiles van firewall- en /of scandetectorprogramma's. Probeert u zoveel mogelijk van de volgende gegevens te sturen: - De datum waarop de activiteit waarover u melding maakt, heeft plaatsgevonden. - Het exacte tijdstip waarop de activiteit waarover u klaagt heeft plaatsgevonden, tot op de seconde nauwkeurig, inclusief de gebruikte tijdszone in UTC (In de zomer is de gewone Nederlandse tijd UTC+2 uur, in de winter is dit UTC+1) van een NTP-gesynchroniseerde klok. - source IP-adres en source poort. - destination IP adres en destination poort. - gebruikte protocol. - verstuurde of ontvangen data. In het geval van Usenet-spam of -misbruik, gelieve ons het complete bericht toe te sturen, inclusief alle headers. Als het bericht een groot non-tekst (binary) bestand bevat, laat u deze dan liever achterwege. Geeft u in uw email aan in welke nieuwsgroep(en) u het bericht bezwaarlijk vindt en stuurt u een link naar het charter (handvest) van die nieuwsgroep(en) waarmee u uw bezwaar onderbouwt. In het geval van email-spam of -misbruik, gelieve ons in ieder geval de complete header te sturen en de inhoud van het bericht (mits relevant). Zorgt u er ieder geval voor dat alle zogenaamde 'Received' headers aanwezig en volledig zijn. Dit is belangrijk! Via http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/19.html en http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-abuse-faq.html kunt u voor diverse mailprogramma's aanwijzingen vinden hoe u deze headers kunt verkrijgen. Het IP-adres dat net boven de afzender staat, laat zien via welke provider het bericht verstuurd is. Begint dit adres met 195.121.xxx.xxx, 213.75.xxx.xxx, 213.10.xxx.xxx, 62.131.xxx.xxx, 80.60.xxx.xxx, 80.61.xxx.xxx, 145.53.xxx.xxx, 81.204.xxx.xxx, 81.205.xxx.xxx, 81.206.xxx.xxx of 81.207.xxx.xxx dan kunt u een melding sturen naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Betreft het een ander IP-adres, dan kunnen wij uw melding helaas niet in behandeling nemen, omdat het IP-adres niet tot ons domein behoort. U kunt op de volgende internetpagina's nagaan bij welke provider of welk netwerk het IP-adres hoort: http://www.fr1.cyberabuse.org/whois/?page=whois http://www.ripe.net/perl/whois http://www.arin.net/whois/index.html http://www.apnic.net/search/index.html Indien u twijfelt aan de herkomst van een bericht, laat u het dan bij voorkeur analyseren door een online dienst zoals http://spamcop.net/. Dit is een uitstekende gratis service die in staat is aan de juiste contactpersonen te rapporteren. Wij verzoeken u vriendelijk doch dringend: - GEEN meerdere berichten over hetzelfde onderwerp te sturen. - GEEN meerdere klachten in een mail te sturen - GEEN complete logfiles te sturen. Enkel de logregels uit de logfile sturen die het betreffende IP-adres bevatten - GEEN attachements te sturen. De Planet Media Group abusedesk accepteert geen attachements. - GEEN geformatteerde tekst te sturen (Word, Excel, etc.). - GEEN trace routes, whois lookups of ping resultaten te sturen. Dit omdat deze niet bijdragen aan het onderzoek en enkel resulteren in het onleesbaar worden van uw melding. Actuele virussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=623[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=609[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=608[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=574 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=546 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=virusid=547 De laatste antivirusupdates zijn te vinden op: http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=184983/sc=2661f1 [English version] THIS IS AN AUTOMATED REPLY Thank you for notifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]. We hereby acknowledge that your email has been received. Please note that you may not receive a personal response, but that all cases will be carefully investigated if properly documented. To be able to investigate an abuse case, please make sure you send us as much information as possible. If you have not already done so, please send us all information you have. Only with enough information
AUTO-REPLY: PLEASE READ! / AUTOMATISCHE ANTWORT: BITTE LESEN!
AUTO-REPLY: PLEASE READ! / AUTOMATISCHE ANTWORT: BITTE LESEN! For security reasons and to preserve our bandwidths, our server blocks and deletes emails which contain attachments (like yours). Please send plain text mails without any kind of attachment (no HTML mails!) - only they will get through to us! More info: http://faq.j-m-s.com If you planned to send us a scan of a money transfer receipt or something similar, you can fax it to us: +49 203 501517 Aus Sicherheitsgründen und zum Schutz unserer Kapazitäten blockiert und löscht unser Server alle E-Mails mit Anhang (wie auch Ihre). Bitte schicken Sie uns nur Text-E-Mails ohne jegliche Anhänge (auch kein HTML!) - nur diese Mails erreichen uns. Weitere Infos: http://faq.j-m-s.de Wenn Sie uns einen Scan einer Überweisungs-Quittung o.ä. schicken wollten, so können Sie es uns faxen: +49 203 501517
reply to list
http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Re: reply to list
Ühel kenal päeval (kolmapäev, 1. jaanuar 2003 14:21) kirjutas Russell Coker: http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... It is already there, at least in 3.1. -- Hasso Tepper KDE Estonian Team
Re: reply to list
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:33, Hasso Tepper wrote: Coker: http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... It is already there, at least in 3.1. You are right! It's on the Message menu and has the hot-key 'L'. I didn't notice it because there's no icon on the toolbar... -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Re: reply to list
hi, On Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2003 13:45, Russell Coker wrote: You are right! It's on the Message menu and has the hot-key 'L'. I didn't notice it because there's no icon on the toolbar... You can add it to your toolbar by right-clicking on the bar and configure it. so long, Timo -- ... there are 10 types of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't.
Re: reply to list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2003 13:33 schrieb Hasso Tepper: Ühel kenal päeval (kolmapäev, 1. jaanuar 2003 14:21) kirjutas Russell Coker: http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... It is already there, at least in 3.1. KMail can handle mailing list since KDE2.2. You can easyly adding a filter to put all mailing list mails to a its own folder (right-click on a mailing list message and see the filter options there), have that folder setup for the account, you use with the mailing list and also the mailing list posting address. O.k., no icon (since KDE3, you can add one manually by editing the button bar!) but the 'L' key is the same like mutt (?) HS - -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de oder über pgp.net PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+EwRgzvr6q9zCwcERAq3oAJ4j41gBl9M2BB18XElHCG5bJ9KiAQCgjaqH c8cdfCPW5kPMslNl9EeFbXs= =FUXC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: reply to list
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:21 am, Russell Coker wrote: http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... I guess it depends on where you want the 'reply-list' command to be available. In Kmail 3.0.5a there is a 'reply list' option in the message submenu of the main toolbar, not available in the menu when you right click on the message in the message header listing. 'Send Reply to' is available if you right click on the 'To:' field in the message header of the message itself. I do like the way Evolution has the 'reply-to-list' available by right clicking on the message header listing. -- Greg Madden
Re: reply to list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2003 21:53 schrieb Greg Madden: On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:21 am, Russell Coker wrote: http://russnelson.com/rt.html This would be a good feature to have in Kmail... I guess it depends on where you want the 'reply-list' command to be available. In Kmail 3.0.5a there is a 'reply list' option in the message submenu of the main toolbar, not available in the menu when you right click on the message in the message header listing. 'Send Reply to' is available if you right click on the 'To:' field in the message header of the message itself. I do like the way Evolution has the 'reply-to-list' available by right clicking on the message header listing. Then why did I find no bug report about this at bugs.kde.org? HS - -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de oder über pgp.net PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+E1oezvr6q9zCwcERAnFRAKC9wbXbiIMFAq19K/NEZSJFYRxjWgCfTLAM dmW1laU/LXKYBk1qJVvLHJw= =ChqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Automated reply from nuclenet@www.nuclear-network.de
Danke für Ihre eMail. Leider gibt es diese Adresse nicht. Bitte schicken Sie diese Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED], falls Sie sonst keine Kontakt-eMail-Adresse kennen! Vielen Dank, Das NN-Team
Reply List [was Re: filters in kmail]
On Saturday 03 November 2001 11:20, David P James wrote: I just recently started subscribing to the debian-kde and debian-user mailing lists, and I've got filters set up in kmail to transfer mailings from those lists to specific folders. The folders have got the folder holds mailing-list option checked with the post address field filled out as well. But whenever I reply to a posting it defaults to sending it to the original sender (no real surprise there). I can send a *new* message to the mailing list by right-clicking on the folder, but not a reply. Instead I have to use reply-all and then remove the address of the original sender (so he doesn't get the same message twice). Does anyone else who uses KMail (1.2 with KDE 2.1.2) have a solution to this? Ok, I found an answer of sorts... Under Message there is the option of 'Reply List' which does just that, and one can use 'L' to do so. Ok, so now my question is more like is there a way to customize the icons on the control bar at the top to insert the option to reply to list? This reply list feature is quite neat, btw. It automagically removes the previous person's signature and the mailing list signature from your reply... (though some might want to requote the previous person's signature I suppose). -- David P. James Third Year Economics Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario http://members.home.com/dpjames/ The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe. -Dr. Leonard McCoy, Star Trek IV
Knode-email reply from addressbook?
When i click on reply or forward by email in Knode, the composer window has a 'Browse' button after the To: line. I think this should contain email addresses but its empty, and clicking OK gives a message could not read address book entry'. I did not find this feature in the documentation. How can i make entries and use this 'addressbook' feature? Its not the same as Kab.
Please reply
Hi For some reason for 2 days now I don't receive anything from the list.Can somebody please CC'me with a reply if the message made it to the list.I want to check my subscription. Thanks
Re: Please reply
On Saturday 30 December 2000 12:37, Mircea Luca wrote: Hi For some reason for 2 days now I don't receive anything from the list.Can somebody please CC'me with a reply if the message made it to the list.I want to check my subscription. Thanks Loud and clear ;) -- Myles Green Calgary AB Canada http://linuxsteps.webjump.com/ -- ^X^C q quit :q ^C end x exit ZZ ^D ? help shit ..
