Re: Wheezy Security Support
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:43:53 +0200 Markus Raab wrote: Hello Markus, >Is this true? "No security support upstream and backports not feasible" >is double negated, so actually it says there must be a security support? It's not a double negative, but two separate negatives (that's the way I read it): 1) (there is) No security support upstream. 2) Backports (are) not feasible. Perhaps it could have been phrased better to avoid confusion. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" Sign away your life Tin Soldiers - Stiff Little Fingers pgpWm2HFLacz1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Wheezy Security Support
Hello, The newly arrived debian-security-support package claims that for a number of kde packages there is no more security support for wheezy. Is this true? "No security support upstream and backports not feasible" is double negated, so actually it says there must be a security support? Are there any plans for new kde packages, either in wheezy or in wheezy- backports? Is it possible to give any dates? best regards, Markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m0bk69$8tm$1...@news.albasani.net
