Re: following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 13 December 2001 12:35 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:23:26PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 December 2001 17:43, David Bishop wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 December 2001 08:40 am, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > > > yes.  KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed.
> > >
> > > Sweet, then I'll just wait for the next release of packages.  Thanks!
> >
> > The branch won't last too long. There may not be another bugfix release.
>
> the branch will last until well after 3.0 is released.

That, and the "releases" are mainly for the packagers sake: i.e., giving the 
packagers a snapshot to use as a reference.  A stable branch like 2_2 should 
*always* be usable, and people are still rolling bugfixes and updates into it 
(hence my original question :-).  So, to sum up, whether or not there is an 
official 2.2.3 or not is pretty irrelevant...

- -- 
D.A.Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8GQ64EHLN/FXAbC0RAovaAKCcK1raK69ZZJvHVCfN2iVIrWW5AACfTCB3
kLfvDIepr83O77GUVZKsxAA=
=tQa8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:23:26PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2001 17:43, David Bishop wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 December 2001 08:40 am, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > >
> > > yes.  KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed.
> >
> > Sweet, then I'll just wait for the next release of packages.  Thanks!
> 
> The branch won't last too long. There may not be another bugfix release.

the branch will last until well after 3.0 is released.

Ivan

-- 

Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD




Re: following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
On Thursday 13 December 2001 17:43, David Bishop wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2001 08:40 am, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> >
> > yes.  KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed.
>
> Sweet, then I'll just wait for the next release of packages.  Thanks!

The branch won't last too long. There may not be another bugfix release.

-- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C




Re: following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 13 December 2001 08:40 am, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > Quick question, do the latest kde 2.2.2 packages use strictly
> > KDE_2_2_RELEASE or KDE_2_2_BRANCH?  There have been some bug fixes in
> > _BRANCH that I would love to get my hands on, specifically (supposedly) a
> > fix for the *long* standing "can't use an authenticating proxy with ssl"
> > bug.
>
> yes.  KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed.

Sweet, then I'll just wait for the next release of packages.  Thanks!

- -- 
D.A.Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8GMynEHLN/FXAbC0RAiNzAKCH9ks4oYRhAJBiruIQu2rKOybSRwCgmbPM
FJDhBQZY3tsl6Wv+jwLIHts=
=jys4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
> Quick question, do the latest kde 2.2.2 packages use strictly KDE_2_2_RELEASE 
> or KDE_2_2_BRANCH?  There have been some bug fixes in _BRANCH that I would 
> love to get my hands on, specifically (supposedly) a fix for the *long* 
> standing "can't use an authenticating proxy with ssl" bug.

yes.  KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed.

Ivan

-- 

Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD




following 2.2.2

2001-12-13 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Quick question, do the latest kde 2.2.2 packages use strictly KDE_2_2_RELEASE 
or KDE_2_2_BRANCH?  There have been some bug fixes in _BRANCH that I would 
love to get my hands on, specifically (supposedly) a fix for the *long* 
standing "can't use an authenticating proxy with ssl" bug.

Thanks.

- -- 
D.A.Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8GMDCEHLN/FXAbC0RApQtAJ94XerHKeHcyTXMz+mHWT70iHWWNQCfaMKi
2MtSLehEiiAlophiDJv6hLQ=
=je/5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-