Re: plasma 5.25
Patrick Franz wrote: > As always: Wait until all packages from 5.25 are available before you > upgrade. I see that at least some 5.25 packages made it to testing. How would one know if other 5.25 will still be coming or if all 5.25 packages are now available? Regards,
Re: plasma 5.25
dear, Thank you for bringing Plasma 5.25 to Sid. Luc Op do 21 jul. 2022 18:29 schreef Patrick Franz : > Hej, > > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2022, 07:31:39 CEST schrieb Luc Castermans: > > Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All > > good sofar. > > > > Big thank you for making this happen!! > > We've just uploaded Plasma 5.25 to unstable. It will take until tomorrow > until all packages have been built and synced to the mirrors. > > As always: Wait until all packages from 5.25 are available before you > upgrade. > > > -- > Med vänliga hälsningar > > Patrick Franz > > >
Re: plasma 5.25
Hej, Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2022, 07:31:39 CEST schrieb Luc Castermans: > Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All > good sofar. > > Big thank you for making this happen!! We've just uploaded Plasma 5.25 to unstable. It will take until tomorrow until all packages have been built and synced to the mirrors. As always: Wait until all packages from 5.25 are available before you upgrade. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
Re: plasma 5.25
Hi Aurélien, > There's an ongoing Qt 5 transition so I won't upload to unstable just now to avoid it and the Plasma transition stepping onto each other's toes. > But it should happen in the coming week or so. I noticed that plasma is still stuck to 5.24.5 on sid/bookworm, more than an month after your message. Is there any plan to update soon? Or is there anything blocking the upgrade? I am impatient to test 5.25 on my bookworm laptop to see if my bugs with multi-screen have been fixed. Thanks and all the best, Frédéric
Re: plasma 5.25 / PIM 22.04
On Monday, 20 June 2022 13:10:45 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > - I had created a Filter rule, to filter out all the crypto spam. That rule > seems to be gone now (and possibly others; I only have the rules from the > Anti-Spam wizard left). And now I get the attached popup every time I start > Kontact/KMail and I don't see how I can do something useful with it. The rule is gone, but I also no longer get the popup :-) The problem was initially not just present directly after upgrade or after the first reboot, but later on. I have no idea what made it go away, but I'm glad it did. If needed, I can recreate the filter rule. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: plasma 5.25 / PIM 22.04
On Sunday, 19 June 2022 19:43:47 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > I was now able to install kdepim-addons again. Since I did that/those upgrade(s), I noticed 2 things: - Before, when I logged into my KDE session I always got a request for my KWallet password and when I then opened Kontact/KMail, I didn't get asked (again) as it had access to passwords it needed. After, I don't get asked on KDE session login, but when actually starting Kontact/KMail. Not problematic, just different. - I had created a Filter rule, to filter out all the crypto spam. That rule seems to be gone now (and possibly others; I only have the rules from the Anti-Spam wizard left). And now I get the attached popup every time I start Kontact/KMail and I don't see how I can do something useful with it. FTR: I didn't blank out account names; the list is just empty. So it seems to be aware that there is/was such a (custom) filter, but otherwise it seems to be gone? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: plasma 5.25 / PIM 22.04
On Friday, 17 June 2022 08:04:58 CEST Patrick Franz wrote: > I was planning to upload KDE PIM 22.04.2 very soon (maybe this weekend > already). And that of course will then be build against Qt 5.15.4. Thanks for that update :-) I was now able to install kdepim-addons again. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: plasma 5.25 / PIM 22.04
Hi, Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2022, 07:36:33 CEST schrieb Aurélien COUDERC: [...] > PIM 22.04.x in experimental was built before the Qt transition so it > still has the dependencies on Qt 5.15.2, so right now you kind of have > to fallback to PIM 21.12.x from unstable which has been rebuilt with > the new Qt. > > @Patrick I don’t know what your plans are for PIM but would you mind > rebuilding the experimental version against Qt 5.15.4 ? I was planning to upload KDE PIM 22.04.2 very soon (maybe this weekend already). And that of course will then be build against Qt 5.15.4. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
Re: plasma 5.25 / PIM 22.04
Hi Diederik,
Le 17/06/2022 à 01:52, Diederik de Haas a écrit :
On Thursday, 16 June 2022 07:40:07 CEST Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
Le 16 juin 2022 07:31:39 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans
a écrit :
Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All good
sofar.
good to know, thanks for the feedback.
There's an ongoing Qt 5 transition so I won't upload to unstable just now to
avoid it and the Plasma transition stepping onto each other's toes.
I seem to have run into an issue:
Ah, yes.
# aptitude install kdepim-addons libkpimitinerary5 -t experimental
The following NEW packages will be installed:
kdepim-addons libkpimitinerary-data{a} libkpimitinerary5{b}
libkpimpkpass5{a} libphonenumber8{a}
0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 176 not upgraded.
Need to get 2,690 kB of archives. After unpacking 13.9 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libkpimitinerary5 : Depends: qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-2 which is a virtual
package, provided by:
- libqt5qml5 (5.15.2+dfsg-10), but 5.15.4+dfsg-3
is installed
- libqt5qml5 (5.15.2+dfsg-6), but 5.15.4+dfsg-3
is installed
PIM 22.04.x in experimental was built before the Qt transition so it
still has the dependencies on Qt 5.15.2, so right now you kind of have
to fallback to PIM 21.12.x from unstable which has been rebuilt with the
new Qt.
@Patrick I don’t know what your plans are for PIM but would you mind
rebuilding the experimental version against Qt 5.15.4 ?
Thanks !
--
Aurélien
Re: plasma 5.25
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > >Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All good > > >sofar. > > > > good to know, thanks for the feedback. > > > > There's an ongoing Qt 5 transition so I won't upload to unstable just now to > > avoid it and the Plasma transition stepping onto each other's toes. > > I seem to have run into an issue: Which matches the quote above AFAICS. I guess Luc being able to install it was either an already closed possibility or it worked because of a smaller set of installed packages. > it looks like some/most packages are compiled against > qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-4, but others against qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-2 ? The ones in experimental, including libkpimitinerary5 in your error output, need old Qt but you have new Qt from sid already installed. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: plasma 5.25
On Thursday, 16 June 2022 07:40:07 CEST Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> Le 16 juin 2022 07:31:39 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans
a écrit :
> >Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All good
> >sofar.
>
> good to know, thanks for the feedback.
>
> There's an ongoing Qt 5 transition so I won't upload to unstable just now to
> avoid it and the Plasma transition stepping onto each other's toes.
I seem to have run into an issue:
# aptitude install kdepim-addons libkpimitinerary5 -t experimental
The following NEW packages will be installed:
kdepim-addons libkpimitinerary-data{a} libkpimitinerary5{b}
libkpimpkpass5{a} libphonenumber8{a}
0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 176 not upgraded.
Need to get 2,690 kB of archives. After unpacking 13.9 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libkpimitinerary5 : Depends: qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-2 which is a virtual
package, provided by:
- libqt5qml5 (5.15.2+dfsg-10), but 5.15.4+dfsg-3
is installed
- libqt5qml5 (5.15.2+dfsg-6), but 5.15.4+dfsg-3
is installed
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) kdepim-addons [Not Installed]
2) libkpimitinerary5 [Not Installed]
In a prior upgrade step, I removed those packages, assuming I'd be able to
install them later, but it looks like some/most packages are compiled against
qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-4, but others against qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-2 ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: plasma 5.25
Hi Luc, Le 16 juin 2022 07:31:39 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans a écrit : >Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All good >sofar. > >Big thank you for making this happen!! good to know, thanks for the feedback. There's an ongoing Qt 5 transition so I won't upload to unstable just now to avoid it and the Plasma transition stepping onto each other's toes. But it should happen in the coming week or so. Happy hacking ! -- Aurélien
plasma 5.25
Yesterday I was able to install Plasma 5.25 from Experimental. All good sofar. Big thank you for making this happen!! Regards, Luc Castermans
Re: Plasma 5.25 beta in experimental (was: Thank you!)
Hi, thanks, appreciated. By the way, I’ve uploaded Plasma 5.25 beta to experimental. If you feel like testing pre-release software and reporting issues to the upstream project, feel free to give it a try. ;-) Happy hacking ! -- Aurélien Le 02/06/2022 à 08:26, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : Hi! A huge thanks to the Debian Qt/KDE maintainer team for the continued work on Qt/KDE related packages. Thank you to Pino, Patrick, Aurélien and of course all the others for tirelessly packaging newest versions of Qt, including Qt 6 which KDE will switch to at some time, Plasma, KDE Frameworks, KDE Gear, KDEPIM and all the other applications from KDE, including new ones like the Korganizer alternative Kalendar. I bet in total that could easily be about one thousand packages, maybe even more. It is a huge effort to pull this off! While not all of this is available within unstable yet, at least not in most recent versions, most of it is and the state of the art in unstable regarding KDE related packages is very decent. Thank you for this continued effort to all of you, of course also to those who I did not mention specifically including those long term team members who advice newcomers to the team on packaging questions and those who contributed a lot previously. I appreciate your effort! Best,
