Bug#272029: FATX filesystem support
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: tags 272029 +upstream thanks Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks. Upstream rejected them untill they're a lot more commonly used, which can also be read as supported in major distributions like Debian. Considering your opinion then the patches should go to /dev/null? Where are we going? FATX support is non-disruptive (Separate module from vfat. It won't even be loaded at all unless the user wants it). What are the problems with it? If your concern is with the release process, I can understand, and don't mind leaving this as post-sarge. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `-
Bug#272029: FATX filesystem support
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: tags 272029 +upstream thanks Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks. Upstream rejected them untill they're a lot more commonly used, which can also be read as supported in major distributions like Debian. Considering your opinion then the patches should go to /dev/null? Where are we going? FATX support is non-disruptive (Separate module from vfat. It won't even be loaded at all unless the user wants it). What are the problems with it? If your concern is with the release process, I can understand, and don't mind leaving this as post-sarge. That was for the Xbox hardware support. There's no reason not to push the partition and filesystem support - there's lots of foreign partitioning scheme and filesystem support in Linux.
Processed: ingress bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 271858 normal Bug#271858: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp: Kernel panics when network traffic starts Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#271858: ingress bug
severity 271858 normal thanks This is not an RC bug; it is an ingress bug, which should be easily avoided, and not relevant to most kernel users. On the topic of the actual bug, it appears that qdisc_priv(sch) in ingress_enqueue() is somehow returning NULL (which is being stored in %eax, and dereferenced by the p-filter_list bit). However, sch's address is stored in %edi, and qdisc_priv() is just returning sch+128; definitely shouldn't be NUL (unless i'm reading the asm wrong). -- Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: 2.2 kernels and 2.2.26
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-12 17:06]: We currently have 2.2.25 (kernel-source-2.2.25) in the archive, while 2.2.26 has been available for quite some time fixing some important bugs (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26). Can someone who cares about 2.2 please package 2.2.26 and get all the dependent packages updated. It has been more than a month since this issue has been raised. Christian, are you going to take care of this? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272351: 2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available
Package: kernel-source-2.2.25 Severity: important Tags: security 2.2.26 fixes some security issues. I don't know how severe they are so I'm filing this bug as 'important' but it may just as well be RC. The 2.2.26 changelog from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26 is below: 2.2.26 -- o CAN-2004-0077: behave safely in case of do_munmap() (Solar Designer) failures in mremap(2) o CAN-2003-0984: /dev/rtc can leak parts of kernel(Solar Designer) memory to unprivileged users (2.4 backport) o CAN-2003-0244: hashing exploits in network stack(David S. Miller) o update_atime() performance improvement (2.4 backport) (Solar Designer) o ability to swapoff after a device file might(Solar Designer) have been re-created o MAINTAINERS correction for Kernel 2.2 and 2.2 fixes (me) o fixed some typos(Solar Designer, me) -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272351: 2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.2.25
Severity: important
Tags: security
2.2.26 fixes some security issues. I don't know how severe they are
so I'm filing this bug as 'important' but it may just as well be RC.
All of the security fixes in 2.2.26 are already in the Debian 2.2.25
package.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Re: 2.2 kernels and 2.2.26
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-09-19 15:26]: We currently have 2.2.25 (kernel-source-2.2.25) in the archive, while 2.2.26 has been available for quite some time fixing some important bugs (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26). Can someone who cares about 2.2 please package 2.2.26 and get all the dependent packages updated. It has been more than a month since this issue has been raised. Never mind. Herbert Xu just pointed out that all of the security fixes in 2.2.26 are already in the Debian 2.2.25 package. Sorry for not checking that. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixed in -3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 271858 + sarge Bug#271858: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp: Kernel panics when network traffic starts There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#255449: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-k7: cpio complains while installing)
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:42:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed already has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2004 02:41:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 19:41:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-60-232.swiftdsl.com.au (seal.fluffyspider.com.au) [218.214.60.232] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BcEkl-iW-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:41:47 -0700 Received: from clam.fluffyspider.com.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.12.28]) by seal.fluffyspider.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i5L2ffOi024844; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:41:41 +1000 Received: from akumria by clam.fluffyspider.com.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BcEke-0004HR-00; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:41:40 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-image-2.6-k7: cpio complains while installing X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:41:40 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.6-k7 Version: 2.6.6-2 Severity: minor Hi there, Setting up kernel-image-2.6.6-2-k7 (2.6.6-2) ... cpio: /etc/modprobe.conf: No such file or directory cpio: /lib/modules/modprobe.conf: No such file or directory Apparently the latest versions of module-init-tools no longer ship/use this file. Regards, Anand -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-k7 depends on: ii kernel-image-2.6.6-2-k7 2.6.6-2Linux kernel image for version 2.6 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 255449-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2004 02:42:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 19 19:42:26 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zero.voxel.net [209.123.232.253] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C9E8I-0005pA-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:42:26 -0700 Received: from spiral.internal (alb-24-194-62-26.nycap.rr.com [24.194.62.26]) by zero.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C424AE05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: fixed already From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-999WsKRVw8RhC3oKLn+g Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:42:18 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.90 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --=-999WsKRVw8RhC3oKLn+g Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug is fixed already (and isn't even a kernel-image bug); see #260695 for details. --=20 Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=-999WsKRVw8RhC3oKLn+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBTkOJ78o9R9NraMQRAmC/AJ9DpXyX2ec/L6ZDOrMMXsWbnvXIwwCfdhNz RKDZAH5l76CE0CGC5pZZ+eU= =PUjY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-999WsKRVw8RhC3oKLn+g--
Bug#266629: related bug
I'm betting #259056 is related to this. I'll research whether this is a kernel or module-init-tools bug later. -- Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#264240: not kernel-image's responsibility
reassign 264240 kernel-package severity 264240 wishlist retitle 264240 kernel-package: should warn for ide-scsi in lilo.conf thanks Reassigning as a wishlist bug for kernel-package; this is something Manoj can choose to implement, if he wishes. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
p[g^CLOVERS²o^Ä
p[g^CLOVERS̲o^[Å·Bêx¨èµÜµ½ªÄx¨è¢½µÜ·B ºLÌAhX©ço^ð±¯Ä¾³¢B http://www.parttime-lovers.com/ez/reg2.htm?uid=15819 ¡ãA±Ìo^mF[ªsKvÈûͺLÌAhXÉANZXµÄº³¢B http://www.parttime-lovers.com/touroku_del.htm?uid=15819
Processed: not kernel-image's responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 264240 kernel-package Bug#264240: Kernel-image 2.6 should give a warning if append ide-scsi is present in lilo.conf Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6-386' to `kernel-package'. severity 264240 wishlist Bug#264240: Kernel-image 2.6 should give a warning if append ide-scsi is present in lilo.conf Severity set to `wishlist'. retitle 264240 kernel-package: should warn for ide-scsi in lilo.conf Bug#264240: Kernel-image 2.6 should give a warning if append ide-scsi is present in lilo.conf Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#271858: fixed in -3
tags 271858 + sarge thanks Actually, it looks like this was fixed in -3; please try it out and confirm. -2 is still in testing, as it's presumably waiting for kernel- latest to make it through NEW. -- Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#272342: Won't boot with my usual kernel options (ACPI related)
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.8-3 With kernel 2.6.8-2, I had to use these kernel options to get it to boot: acpi=off noapic nolapic. But it worked just fine with those options (it's an always-on server, so I don't need power management features). But when I upgraded to 2.6.8-3, it wouldn't boot with those options. Or any other combination I tried (and I tried more than two dozen combinations, including none, and including other kernel options like acpi=ht and pci=noacpi). When I try with my usual set of kernel options (or most any other set that is meant to disable acpi), it stops at this line: ACPI: IRQ9 SCI: Edge set to Level Trigger
