Bug#289974: kernel-source-2.6.10: kernel compilation fails with selinux without ipv6 : patch
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(also attached) briefly describes and fixes the problem.
"It works for me." (Well, it compiles now, at least.)
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9zona-06022se
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii bzip2 1.0.2-3high-quality block-sorting file co
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2005/01/02 09:46:42-08:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# [PATCH] fix inet6_sk for non IPV6 builds again
#
# The recent ipv6 "fix" broke the build:
#
# security/selinux/avc.c: In function `avc_audit':
# security/selinux/avc.c:581: warning: implicit declaration of function
`inet6_sk'
# security/selinux/avc.c:581: warning: initialization makes pointer from
integer without a cast
#
# Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#
# include/linux/ipv6.h
# 2005/01/02 01:37:34-08:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] +11 -0
# fix inet6_sk for non IPV6 builds again
#
diff -Nru a/include/linux/ipv6.h b/include/linux/ipv6.h
--- a/include/linux/ipv6.h 2005-01-02 10:13:56 -08:00
+++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h 2005-01-02 10:13:56 -08:00
@@ -289,6 +289,17 @@
#else
#define __ipv6_only_sock(sk) 0
#define ipv6_only_sock(sk) 0
+
+static inline struct ipv6_pinfo * inet6_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct raw6_opt * raw6_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
#endif
#endif
Bug#289894: EPSON Perfection 610 fails scanning
After some digging, I found that the problem seems related to gpilotd and not kernel. In fact if I stop or suspend gpilotd, everything works as expected! No more errors. I'm missing the skills and experience to understand exactly what happens when gpilotd is running. If anyone have an answer, please reply. Should i reassign the bug under the gnome-pilot package?
kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101_sparc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-headers-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-image-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-image-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-image-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.dsc kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patch, Bug#286226
kevin wrote: hi i´m having the same problem as rene in the message below: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/12/msg00384.html where is the patch?? http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] It'll soon be included in kernel-source-2.4.27. -- Joshua Kwan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing of kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101_sparc.changes
kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.dsc kernel-latest-2.6-sparc_101.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb kernel-headers-2.6-sparc32_101_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64_101_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_101_sparc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#240932: (fwd) RE: ide troubles
I don't have time to try all this today, but I tried 2 things: 1) Using linux 2.6 "linux26" - same result as default Linux 2.4. 2) Using "linux debconf/priority=medium", I _only_ loaded the following modules when detecting my CDROM (because now it asked me...): ide-detect ide-disk ide-cd isofs That works - problem solved! I have to run now, but I'll try some more things you suggested tomorrow. Thanks, Will > -Original Message- > From: Frans Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:30 PM > To: Will Lentz > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (fwd) RE: ide troubles > > On Tuesday 11 January 2005 20:19, you wrote: > > I did see a progress bar that displays all directory names under > > /pool/*/*. > > Hmmm. The log does not really tell us anything new. > > Here's a few more things to try. For both I advice you to boot the > installer with 'linux debconf/priority=medium'. > > 1. Check if DMA is enabled for the CD drive and disable it. > From vt2, check dmesg for something like: > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:01.1 to 64 > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc000-0xc007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio > hda: QEMU HARDDISK, ATA DISK drive > hdc: QEMU CD-ROM, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > > Also check: > cat /proc/ide/hd?/settings for value of using_dma > > If the CD-drive is showing dma after BIOS settings and proc is also > showing dma, try disabling it with 'echo -n "using_dma:0" >settings'. > > 2. See what's really going on in cdrom-detect. > From vt2, 'nano /var/lib/dpkg/info/cdrom-detect.postinst'; > uncomment the > 'set -x' command, switch back to vt1 and run cdrom-detect. > > Check what's in the syslog. > For the directory scan, you should see a lot of: > + db_subst cdrom-detect/scanning_progress_step DIR /cdrom/pool/main/a > + echo SUBST cdrom-detect/scanning_progress_step DIR > /cdrom/pool/main/a > (I removed the date and stuff) > > After doing 'z', you should see this: > + find /cdrom/pool/main/z/ > + db_progress STEP 1 > + echo PROGRESS STEP 1 > + local IFS= > > + local _LINE > + read -r _LINE > + RET=OK > + return 0 > + db_progress STOP > + echo PROGRESS STOP > + local IFS= > > + local _LINE > + read -r _LINE > + RET=OK > + return 0 > + relfile=/cdrom/dists/stable/Release > + [ -e /cdrom/dists/stable/Release ] > + sed -n s/^Suite: *//p /cdrom/dists/stable/Release > + suite=testing > + log Detected CD with 'testing' distribution > + logger -t cdrom-detect Detected CD with 'testing' distribution > + db_set mirror/suite testing > + echo SET mirror/suite testing > + local IFS= > > You could try adding commands in the script at the point > where it fails to > see if you, for instance can read other files. > > BTW. Did you try the 2.6 kernel? Just boot the installer with linux26. > >
Bug#240932: (fwd) RE: ide troubles
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 20:19, you wrote: > I did see a progress bar that displays all directory names under > /pool/*/*. Hmmm. The log does not really tell us anything new. Here's a few more things to try. For both I advice you to boot the installer with 'linux debconf/priority=medium'. 1. Check if DMA is enabled for the CD drive and disable it. From vt2, check dmesg for something like: PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:01.1 to 64 ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc000-0xc007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio hda: QEMU HARDDISK, ATA DISK drive hdc: QEMU CD-ROM, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive Also check: cat /proc/ide/hd?/settings for value of using_dma If the CD-drive is showing dma after BIOS settings and proc is also showing dma, try disabling it with 'echo -n "using_dma:0" >settings'. 2. See what's really going on in cdrom-detect. From vt2, 'nano /var/lib/dpkg/info/cdrom-detect.postinst'; uncomment the 'set -x' command, switch back to vt1 and run cdrom-detect. Check what's in the syslog. For the directory scan, you should see a lot of: + db_subst cdrom-detect/scanning_progress_step DIR /cdrom/pool/main/a + echo SUBST cdrom-detect/scanning_progress_step DIR /cdrom/pool/main/a (I removed the date and stuff) After doing 'z', you should see this: + find /cdrom/pool/main/z/ + db_progress STEP 1 + echo PROGRESS STEP 1 + local IFS= + local _LINE + read -r _LINE + RET=OK + return 0 + db_progress STOP + echo PROGRESS STOP + local IFS= + local _LINE + read -r _LINE + RET=OK + return 0 + relfile=/cdrom/dists/stable/Release + [ -e /cdrom/dists/stable/Release ] + sed -n s/^Suite: *//p /cdrom/dists/stable/Release + suite=testing + log Detected CD with 'testing' distribution + logger -t cdrom-detect Detected CD with 'testing' distribution + db_set mirror/suite testing + echo SET mirror/suite testing + local IFS= You could try adding commands in the script at the point where it fails to see if you, for instance can read other files. BTW. Did you try the 2.6 kernel? Just boot the installer with linux26.
Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
* Joey Hess wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. > > Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with > them? I'll update the package tomorrow. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACPI problems with kernel 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100
Hello, (Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to debian-kernel) This problem was reported to debian-deval and debian-kernel in November last year. The net effect of failure to allocate IRQ 7 for ALSA is that it fails to start. The problems can be overcome by adding append="pci=acpi" or append="acpi=noirq" to lilo.conf. But, as these are workarounds, the cause should be corrected. I'll file a bug report on this if noone have an immediate solution? The problems heve been found for at least kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.9. Maybe the BIOS has to be upgraded and/or there is something wrong with the PCI routing tables. >From dmesg: ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 lspci shows: :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01) #>cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0:2650500 XT-PIC timer 1: 1678 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 11261 XT-PIC eth1 7: 0 XT-PIC parport0 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi 11:361 XT-PIC eth0, uhci_hcd, yenta, yenta 12: 51568 XT-PIC i8042 14: 3792 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 LOC: 0 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 For kernels 2.4.x ACPI is automatically disabled: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 ACPI: Interpreter disabled. while kernels 2.6.x enables it: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040816 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller :00:1f.1 PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 5 7) *11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 5 7 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.AGP_._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIE._PRT] ACPI: Power Resource [PADA] (on) PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1d.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.6[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:01.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:01.1[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.6[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S4bios S5) ACPI wakeup devices: LID PBTN PCI0 UAR1 USB0 USB1 USB2 MODM PCIE MPCI ... Alocation of IRQ 7 does not seem to work: (this IRQ is allocated by parport0) ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 Intel ICH: probe of :00:1f.5 failed with error -16 The main problem is that alsa does not work. For alsa the audio device is not found: Running alsaconf or (/etc/init.d/alsa start when configured): ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 /etc/init.d/alsa stop Storing ALSA mixer settings...ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 Intel ICH: probe of :00:1f.5 failed with error -16 failed. Running update-modules... Loading driver... Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'. done. Setting default volumes... -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289948: kernel-source-2.6.10: Text display is set to 80x50, but switches back to 80x25
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: normal ..config is attached. I noticed this problem already in 2.6.9: I set the text display to 80x25 (vga=ext or according number in /etc/lilo.conf), but when I switch back from X to the console, the text is 80x25. This is annoying, because the console still "thinks" it has 50 rows, but shows only the upper 25, rendering the console completely useless as you don't see what you type. .config # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.10 # Wed Jan 12 00:25:27 2005 # CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_UID16=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y # # Code maturity level options # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y # CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE is not set CONFIG_BROKEN=y CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y # # General setup # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="" CONFIG_SWAP=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y # CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE is not set CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y # CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 is not set CONFIG_SYSCTL=y # CONFIG_AUDIT is not set CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=14 CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT=y # CONFIG_IKCONFIG is not set # CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set CONFIG_FUTEX=y CONFIG_EPOLL=y # CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set CONFIG_SHMEM=y CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_FUNCTIONS=0 CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_LABELS=0 CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_LOOPS=0 CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_JUMPS=0 # CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set # # Loadable module support # CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y # CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set CONFIG_OBSOLETE_MODPARM=y # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL is not set CONFIG_KMOD=y # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_X86_PC=y # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set # CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set # CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ is not set # CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is not set # CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set # CONFIG_X86_VISWS is not set # CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set # CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set # CONFIG_M586 is not set # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set # CONFIG_MK8 is not set # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set # CONFIG_X86_EMU486 is not set CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_XADD=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7 CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y # CONFIG_HPET_TIMER is not set # CONFIG_SMP is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT=y # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set CONFIG_X86_TSC=y CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL is not set CONFIG_TOSHIBA=y # CONFIG_I8K is not set # CONFIG_MICROCODE is not set CONFIG_X86_MSR=y CONFIG_X86_CPUID=y # # Firmware Drivers # # CONFIG_EDD is not set CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set CONFIG_MTRR=y # CONFIG_EFI is not set CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y # CONFIG_REGPARM is not set # # Power management options (ACPI, APM) # CONFIG_PM=y # CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not set # # ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support # CONFIG_ACPI=y CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y # CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not set CONFIG_ACPI_AC=y CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=y # CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON is not set CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y # CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set # CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=y CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y # CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER is not set # # APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS Support # # CONFIG_APM is not set # # CPU Frequency scaling # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_PROC_INTF is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE is not set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE=y # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE is not set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND is not set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y # # CPUFreq processor drivers # # CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ is not set # CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6 is not set # CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7 is not set # CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8 is not set # CONFIG_X86_GX_SUSPMOD is not set # CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO is not set # CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH is not set # CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI is not set CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=y # CONFIG_X86_CPUFREQ
Bug#120116: Ship Notification, Tracking Number : USP946305232684MOLW
Check your status Below: pro0fpharmaz.com/index.php?id=11 We think in generalities, but we live in details. -Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947) That computer programmer isn't enjoying swimming behind the post office right at this time It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong. -Voltaire [François Marie Arouet] (1694-1778) Luke is missing jumping today. Act in the valley so that you need not fear those who stand on the hill. -Danish proverb Luke is missing jumping today. If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -Anatole France [Jacques Anatole Thibault] (1844-1924) 3
kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101_alpha.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-headers-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-headers-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb kernel-headers-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-headers-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb kernel-image-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-image-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb kernel-image-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-image-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.dsc kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha/kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_powerpc.changes UNACCEPT
Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2.tar.gz is NEW for unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb is NEW for unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2.dsc: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2.dsc is NEW for unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power4_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-build-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. Rejected: Rejected: kernel-headers-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (2.6.9-4) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable. === Despite being ACCEPTed, this package failed the database sanity checks at the time of install. This should only happen rarely and in corner-cases (a binary upload of a package which has since been melanie'd for example), so no code to do the necessary unaccept actions has been written. These actions (e.g. bug reopening, announcement rescinding, etc.) will have to be done by hand. Also, the files have been left in the accepted directory; please deal with them as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101_alpha.changes
kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.dsc kernel-latest-2.4-alpha_101.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb kernel-headers-2.4-generic_101_alpha.deb kernel-image-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb kernel-headers-2.4-smp_101_alpha.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289770: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
dma on a thinkpad 600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9 also non working 2.6.10. -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33) +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63 could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770 full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there. thanks maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263420: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp: oppses while starting, during ACPI?)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:47:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263420: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp: oppses while starting, during ACPI? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2004 09:46:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 04 02:46:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cpc2-rdng8-6-0-cust30.winn.cable.ntl.com (dante) [81.110.74.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BsILx-0004rs-00; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 02:46:33 -0700 Received: from wobble.jones.home.uk ([192.168.1.37] helo=localhost ident=Debian-exim) by dante with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BsILR-Rg-41; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:46:01 +0100 Received: from chris by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BsILQ-uk-Nd; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:46:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" From: Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp: oppses while starting, during ACPI? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:46:00 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.7-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system On booting the 2.6.7 smp kernel i recive errors after the line ACPI Revision 20040326 This errors vary, this is an example ACPI Revision 20040326 unable to handle NULL pointer dereferance <1> unable to handle kernel NULL pointer at virtual address 0001 printing eip 726566675 I have also recived oopses, random asci strings (but no error) followed by hang, and messages about garbage stacks The non smp verson of this package boots, i include the output of dmesg for this kenel *-Start-* pages, LIFO batch:1 Normal zone: 225280 pages, LIFO batch:16 HighMem zone: 32560 pages, LIFO batch:7 DMI 2.3 present. ACPI: RSDP (v000 ACPIAM) @ 0x000f62f0 ACPI: RSDT (v001 INTEL D865PERL 0x20040203 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff3 ACPI: FADT (v002 INTEL D865PERL 0x20040203 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff30200 ACPI: MADT (v001 INTEL D865PERL 0x20040203 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff30300 ACPI: WDDT (v001 INTEL OEMWDDT 0x0001 MSFT 0x010d) @ 0x3ff344e0 ACPI: DSDT (v001 INTEL D865PERL 0x0006 MSFT 0x010d) @ 0x ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x408 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:2 APIC version 20 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) Processor #1 15:2 APIC version 20 WARNING: NR_CPUS limit of 1 reached. Processor ignored. ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] dfl dfl lint[0x1]) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] dfl dfl lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] global_irq_base[0x0]) IOAPIC[0]: Assigned apic_id 2 IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda7 ro Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 4096 (order 12: 32768 bytes) Detected 3192.118 MHz processor. Using pmtmr for high-res timesource Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Memory: 1031208k/1047744k available (1515k kernel code, 15584k reserved, 659k data, 148k init, 130180k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay loop... 6324.22 BogoMIPS Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff CPU: After vendor identify, caps: bfebfbff CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cach
patch, Bug#286226
hi i´m having the same problem as rene in the message below: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/12/msg00384.html where is the patch?? thanks, kevin -- "there is no ideology and there never was any." +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ 1 GB Mailbox bereits in GMX FreeMail http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
Steve Langasek wrote: > For 2.4, this requires i2c, kernel-latest-2.4-i386, linux-wlan-ng, > lm-sensors, and oprofile-source to be ready to go at the same time with > packages built against the new ABI. Of these, oprofile-source has had a > recent upload, but has only out-of-date modules (none built against the new > ABI); i2c has new module packages, all of them with the old ABI version in > the package name and with dependencies on the old kernels; and > kernel-latest-2.4-i386 appears to be in the court of the kernel team. No > info on the others. Is someone on the kernel team willing to coordinate > with the maintainers of those packages? I've filed RC bugs on all of these, except linux-wlan-ng which already had one. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#289909: depends on old abinamed kernel packages
Package: kernel-latest-2.4-i386 Severity: serious kernel-latest needs to be updated to depend on kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386, and so on. Until this is done, the new packages cannot enter testing. I'm making this bug report severity serious since kernel-latest is keeping security fixes out of testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240932: (fwd) RE: ide troubles
I did see a progress bar that displays all directory names under /pool/*/*. Here's the full syslog file for reference: Jan 10 15:57:44 syslogd started: BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040623-1) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: klogd started: BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040623-1) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Linux version 2.4.27-1-386 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-9)) #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: 000c - 000cc000 (reserved) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0010 - 07ff (usable) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: 07ff - 0800 (ACPI data) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: 100a - 1010 (reserved) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: BIOS-e820: ffe0 - 0001 (reserved) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: 127MB LOWMEM available. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 32752 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: zone(0): 4096 pages. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: zone(1): 28656 pages. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: zone(2): 0 pages. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Dell Latitude with broken BIOS detected. Refusing to enable the local APIC. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: RSDP (v000 DELL ) @ 0x000f3cf0 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: RSDT (v001 DELLCPi 0x27d10b07 ASL 0x0061) @ 0x07ff Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: FADT (v001 DELLCPi 0x27d10b07 ASL 0x0061) @ 0x07ff0400 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: DSDT (v001 INT430 SYSFexxx 0x1001 MSFT 0x010c) @ 0x Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Kernel command line: vga=normal initrd=/install/initrd.gz ramdisk_size=10240 root=/dev/rd/0 devfs=mount,dall rw -- BOOT_IMAGE=/install/vmlinuz Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Initializing CPU#0 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Detected 300.687 MHz processor. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 599.65 BogoMIPS Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Memory: 124392k/131008k available (1065k kernel code, 6228k reserved, 457k data, 96k init, 0k highmem) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Buffer cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Page-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: CPU: L2 cache: 512K Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: CPU: After generic, caps: 0183f9ff Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: CPU: Common caps: 0183f9ff Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: CPU: Intel Pentium II (Deschutes) stepping 02 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Checking for popad bug... OK. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ACPI: Interpreter disabled. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfbc7e, last bus=0 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: Using configuration type 1 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: ACPI tables contain no PCI IRQ routing entries Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/7110] at 00:07.0 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers. Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Initializing RT netlink socket Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Starting kswapd Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: VFS: Disk quotas vdquot_6.5.1 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: devfs: v1.12c (20020818) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: devfs: boot_options: 0x1 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with HUB-6 MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: COMX: driver version 0.85 (C) 1995-1999 ITConsult-Pro Co. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 10240K size 1024 blocksize Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Initializing Cryptographic API Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 16384) Jan 10 15:57:44 kernel: Linux IP mul
Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with them? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#289900: Installation seems to clash with kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: minor Hi, I've selected both kernel-headers and kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 for installation today, and ended up with a warning I know for long: Selecting previously deselected package kernel-headers-2.6.10-1. Unpacking kernel-headers-2.6.10-1 (from .../kernel-headers-2.6.10-1_2.6.10-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686. Unpacking kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686 (from .../kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686_2.6.10-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686. Unpacking kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 (from .../kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686_2.6.10-3_i386.deb) ... You are attempting to install a kernel image (version 2.6.10-1-686) However, the directory /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686 still exists. If this directory belongs to a previous kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 package, and if you have deselected some modules, or installed standalone modules packages, this could be bad. However, if this directory exists because you are also installing some stand alone modules right now, and they got unpacked before I did, then this is pretty benign. Unfortunately, I can not tell the difference. If /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686 belongs to a old install of kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686, then this is your last chance to abort the installation of this kernel image (nothing has been changed yet). If this directory is because of stand alone modules being installed right now, or if it does belong to an older kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 package but you know what you are doing, and if you feel that this image should be installed despite this anomaly, Please answer n to the question. Otherwise, I suggest you move /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686 out of the way, perhaps to /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686.old or something, and then try re-installing this image. Do you want to stop now? [Y/n] Ok, Aborting ... Yeah, you know the message, I know the message, I always got it when I truly had some modules installed or when I was updating from the same image, with a different version. But I'm not! It's my first 2.6.10 install! The culprit seems to be: bee% ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2005-01-11 18:51 build -> /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686 bee% dpkg -S /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686/build kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686: /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-686/build Aha! Could it be you added that new "build" symlink (which is probably handy to build some modules such as madwifi I'm sure), and that confuses the "crap detection" script? workaround: install kernel-image first or say "Yes". Regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#289894: EPSON Perfection 610 fails scanning
Package: kernel Version: 2.6 Severity: normal Hello, Everytime I try to scan using this device, the process starts then hangs. It freezes Xsane. I need to unplug the device to get the error message. The problem comes from the USB communication with the device. I end up with a control timeout on ep0in. Tried on kernels 2.6.9-2-686-smp, 2.6.10-1-686-smp and a custom built 2.6.9 : same results. Here is the relevant part of dmesg : usb 4-1: new full speed USB device using address 4 usb 4-1: control timeout on ep0in usb 4-1: control timeout on ep0in usb 4-1: control timeout on ep0in usb 4-1: control timeout on ep0in usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_BULK failed ep 0x81 len 4096 ret -84 usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_BULK failed ep 0x2 len 2 ret -71 usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_BULK failed ep 0x2 len 2 ret -71 usb 4-1: USB disconnect, address 4 Here is the relevant part of lsusb : Bus 004 Device 005: ID 04b8:0103 Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 610 Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 1.00 bDeviceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 255 bMaxPacketSize0 8 idVendor 0x04b8 Seiko Epson Corp. idProduct 0x0103 Perfection 610 bcdDevice0.01 iManufacturer 1 EPSON iProduct2 Perfection610 iSerial 0 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 32 bNumInterfaces 1 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0x40 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 2 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass255 Vendor Specific Subclass bInterfaceProtocol255 Vendor Specific Protocol iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x02 EP 2 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 0 If you need more info, please ask. I'll try later with other kernels and report if I find one that's working. Please forgive me for my bad english. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9vt6410 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Bug#289883: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: usb mass storage device isn't recognized anymore
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: normal I upgraded my kernel from 2.6.8 (kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7) to 2.6.10 k7 (kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7) and as a result my digital camera (Konica dimage Z1) isn't recognized anymore. I used to be able to mount it as a mass storage device but now nothing happens anymore when plugging it in, nothing appears in the kernel log. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.76 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.1-rel-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263420: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp: oppses while starting, during ACPI?
maximilian attems wrote: On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Chris Jones wrote: I have also recived oopses, random asci strings (but no error) followed by hang, and messages about garbage stacks The non smp verson of this package boots, i include the output of dmesg for this kenel is this fixed for you in latest 2.6.8 for sarge? or if you are using unstable in newer 2.6.10? thanks for feedback maks No, the 2.6.8 packaged kernels (I've tired the one in sarge and the one in sid) do not work without acpi bashing. I've just tried 2.6.10 and it seems to work! It even detects my dvb card :) so I'm happy for the moment. -- Chris Jones, SUCS Admin http://sucs.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#100421: Have all 180 episodes of the Seinfeld series on 23 DVDs online now
This is a one-of-a-kind collection. It includes all 180 Episodes of the best sitcom on Television. This is a collection of 23 DVDs which includes all 9 seasons, plus a rare bonus special disk which features bloopers, behind the scenes footage, deleted scenes, etc. More Features: - All 100% in chronological order from the pilot to the finale - Completely commercial free and unedited - Comes completely packaged - 5 boxed sets containing all 23 DVDs with custom artwork - Episode guides so you can find your favorite episode anytime - These are formatted region-free so will play on an DVD player, DVD-ROM, XBOX or PS2 worldwide - The set is brand new and sealed Please don't miss out on this one-time opportunity! http://www.tvshowsondvds.net/index.php?ref=sale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Classification scheme for 2.6 kernel patches
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Marc Haber: > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:52:59PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >> Cherrypicking makes little sense, because there are only cherries. :-) > > > > For my systems, I care about security holes being fixed, but I do not > > care about some obscure video hardware, or additional features. So > > "Cherry" is relative. > > Fix upstream's security process, Broken beyond repair, IMO. > or use vendor kernels. Which is what I am trying to do. Debian is a vendor. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#264339: Appears resolved for me with initrd-tools 0.1.76
This appears to be fixed for me with version 0.1.76 of initrd-tools! Thanks for getting it straightened out. from the changelog: initrd-tools (0.1.76) unstable; urgency=low * Joshua Kwan - Fix typo in Harald's workaround for drivers not listing SCSI modules in /proc/scsi. (Closes: #285301) - Also fix in that same workaround a possible problem with module names with hyphens that get flattened to underscores in 2.6. * Martin Michlmayr - Add support for encrypted root filesystems using dm-crypt and cryptsetup. Patch provided by Wesley W. Terpstra, with modifications and testing by Loic Minier and me (Closes: #247054). -- Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:29:20 + Regards, --dkg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Classification scheme for 2.6 kernel patches
* Marc Haber: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:52:59PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> Cherrypicking makes little sense, because there are only cherries. :-) > > For my systems, I care about security holes being fixed, but I do not > care about some obscure video hardware, or additional features. So > "Cherry" is relative. Fix upstream's security process, or use vendor kernels. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:04:23AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > I have a thinkpad 600E. In the 2.6.8 Debian kernel, DMA is correctly > > set up for the hard drive and DVD-ROM (hda and hdb respectively). In > > both 2.6.9 and 2.6.10, the kernel doesn't believe that DMA is > > available, although according the hdparm, the hard drive thinks that > > it is in UDMA mode 2. > > > please send the output of dmesg of 2.6.8, 2.6.10 and lspci -vv > > this may help to find the roots of the problem. Attached. cheers, Phil -- http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt Linux version 2.6.8-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)) #1 Thu Nov 25 04:34:30 UTC 2004 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 09fd (usable) BIOS-e820: 09fd - 09fdf000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 09fdf000 - 09fe (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 09fe - 0a00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fffe - 0001 (reserved) 0MB HIGHMEM available. 159MB LOWMEM available. On node 0 totalpages: 40912 DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1 Normal zone: 36816 pages, LIFO batch:8 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 DMI 2.0 present. ACPI disabled because your bios is from 99 and too old You can enable it with acpi=force Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda3 ro Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- reenabling. Could not enable APIC! Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 1024 (order 10: 8192 bytes) Detected 297.862 MHz processor. Using tsc for high-res timesource Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Memory: 154396k/163648k available (1545k kernel code, 8664k reserved, 684k data, 148k init, 0k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay loop... 585.72 BogoMIPS Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0183f9ff CPU: After vendor identify, caps: 0183f9ff CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 512K CPU: After all inits, caps:0183f9ff 0040 Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: Intel Pentium II (Deschutes) stepping 02 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (ungzip failed); looks like an initrd Freeing initrd memory: 4540k freed NET: Registered protocol family 16 PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd880, last bus=7 PCI: Using configuration type 1 mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 ACPI: Interpreter disabled. Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay PnPBIOS: Scanning system for PnP BIOS support... PnPBIOS: Found PnP BIOS installation structure at 0xc00fe700 PnPBIOS: PnP BIOS version 1.0, entry 0xf:0xe724, dseg 0xf pnp: 00:0a: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved pnp: 00:0a: ioport range 0x15e0-0x15ef has been reserved pnp: 00:0a: ioport range 0xef00-0xefaf has been reserved pnp: 00:1c: ioport range 0xfcf8-0xfcff has been reserved PnPBIOS: 23 nodes reported by PnP BIOS; 23 recorded by driver PCI: Probing PCI hardware PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/7110] at :00:07.0 PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 4 of device :00:07.1 VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) devfs: 2004-01-31 Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) devfs: boot_options: 0x0 Initializing Cryptographic API Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers. isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards... isapnp: No Plug & Play device found Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 48 ports, IRQ sharing enabled pnp: Device 00:0d activated. ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard on isa0060/serio0 NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP: routing cache hash table of 1024 buckets, 8Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 32768) NET: Registered protocol family 8 NET: Registered protocol family 20 RAMDISK: cramfs filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: Loading 4540 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... |/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/-\|/
Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
* Joey Hess wrote: > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) > are updated. Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel > module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel > "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that: > i386 > 2.4 and 2.6 updated to -2 abiname; debs not yet in testing; > udebs updated. Until debs hit testing we cannot change > rootskel/base-installer to use the new package names. For 2.4, this requires i2c, kernel-latest-2.4-i386, linux-wlan-ng, lm-sensors, and oprofile-source to be ready to go at the same time with packages built against the new ABI. Of these, oprofile-source has had a recent upload, but has only out-of-date modules (none built against the new ABI); i2c has new module packages, all of them with the old ABI version in the package name and with dependencies on the old kernels; and kernel-latest-2.4-i386 appears to be in the court of the kernel team. No info on the others. Is someone on the kernel team willing to coordinate with the maintainers of those packages? 2.6 needs out-of-date binaries removed for the old ABI. > ia64 > Now same as i386. Though with fewer complications from dependent module packages, thankfully. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#289810: kernel-source-2.6.10: blank screen with static vesafb driver
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: important Again the vesafb driver does only lead to a blank screen when compiled in statically, just like the bug pending for kernel-source-2.6.9. The problem exists within the Debian patches only. When I use the vesafb.c out of the kernel.org sources, everything works as expected. Please fix that patch to make the next kernel source package usable with vesafb again! It's a pity the Debian kernels are unusable for weeks now. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-1A high-quality block-sorting file ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
