Bug#296687: Problem Fixed
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:55:42AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:07:20AM -0800, David Lawyer wrote: > > I fixed the problem by setting the parallel port in the BIOS from ECP to > > SPP. Then the driver does software handshaking and my old printer works > > OK. So this is a problem with documentation. I just emailed the > > authors of the kernel docs on the parallel port and told them about this > > fix. So you could close this bug if you want to, although it would be > > nice if somehow the software configured it all. > > Hi David, > > are you suggesting that there should be a kernel option > to restrict the modes that the parallel port driver will > operate in - so that if you have older hardware it will only > use modes supported by the other end. Or are you suggesting > that the driver should autodetect this somehow. My knowledge > of the relevant specs are weak (non-existant), but the latter > sounds like it might not be possible. I think the latter may be possible if one has a modern (not over 20 years old) parrallel port on their PC (like I do). There's a spec for negotiation between the two ports over the parallel cable. In my case, there would be no response from my printer and it would then be assumed by my PC that the printer port doesn't meet IEEE 1284 specs and thus use the old Centronics protocol known as SPP. But I don't know how the port tells that to Linux. The old protocol requires driver handshaking for every byte sent. I think that the BIOS allows setting SPP for cases where the software doesn't know about ECP. Since Linux knows about ECP and since ECP can fallback to SPP mode, it should have worked in ECP mode. So I now think it's a bug and needs to be fixed even though I found a work around to get my printer printing. > In any case, have you considered reporting this to LKML and > the maintainers? How do I do this? > -- > Horms > David Lawyer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:23:59AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > > > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > > > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have > > > > > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to > > > > > speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. > > > > > Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package > > > > > should be > > > > > removed. > > > > > > > > Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 > > > > kernel. > > > > > > Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. > > > > Yep, but not mentioned here. > > But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. > The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week > was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing. Yep, which is why i mentioned them :) > > > Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new > > > against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? > > > > kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. > > Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? Yes, but the ftp-masters know how to handle this right, and will accept all three, and the two first will just vanish. > > The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which > > will > > obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the > > kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i > > got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. > > That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, > I take it that is what the recent discussions on > debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. > Is this correct? Indeed. I uploaded the .udebs for d-i which are based on those, and which didn't need NEW. As joeyh and vorlon mentioned, these .udebs are now in unstable, but not the accompanying source they are built upon, which is a violation of the GPL as long as 2.4.27-3 remains in NEW, i think. Not all that important, but i hope that we can sort this technically in the future. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296894: initrd-tools: function module_exist doesn't recognize modules in subdirs
Am 01.03.2005 um 04:23 schrieb Horms:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:30:16PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: normal
While playing around with virtual scsi drivers, I noticed that modules
that are not directly located inside drivers/scsi where not found by
the script.
The attached patch solves this problem.
--- mkinitrd2005-01-23 19:37:41.0 +0100
+++ mkinitrd.patched2005-02-25 14:10:50.919976624 +0100
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
}
module_exists() {
- [ -f "$MODULEDIR/kernel/$1.$o" ]
+ [ -n "$(find "$MODULEDIR/kernel/${1%%/*}" -name "${1##*/}.$o")" ]
}
print_module() {
That seems fair enough to me, my only reservation is speed.
Did you notice a significant slowdown when using this?
Also, could you be a litte more specific about which modules
are not being found, and where they are coming from?
The find is taking place in a kernel module subdirectory and machines
are fast enough so that I didn't recognize any changes ;-) The module
I'm talking about is (even in vanilla kernels >= 2.6.9) ibmvscsic, a
virtual scsi driver on IBM power4/5 systems. Stumbled here while
adapting the debian installer to work on this hardware.
Cheers,
Cajus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign to proper package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 275910 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#275910: kernel-imege-2.4.26-1-686 hangs on boot because of DMA - error Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-imege-2.4.27-2-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-imege-2.4.27-2-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 248599 kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 Bug#248599: kernel-image-2.4.26-i386: Crapy display in console (Blue verticals bars) Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-i386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-i386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-i386'. > reassign 253351 kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 Bug#253351: kernel-image-2.4.26-i386: please add NetMos PCI multi-IO support Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-i386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-i386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-i386'. > reassign 261391 kernel-image-2.4.27-s390 Bug#261391: please disable timer interrupts by default Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-s390' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-s390' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-s390'. > reassign 277814 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp Bug#277814: Fails to compile ata_piix.o module Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686-smp' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686-smp' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp'. > reassign 241670 kernel-image-2.4.27-hppa Bug#241670: kernel-image-2.4.20-32-smp: inadequate description of SMP Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.25-hppa' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.25-hppa' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-hppa'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: wrong reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign #297232 kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 Bug#297232: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: kernel panic on boot, now all installed kernels fail (backup recovery required) Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-2-k7' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-2-k7' to `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 2.6.9 is gone
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign #282269 kernel-source-2.6.8 Bug#282269: kernel-source-2.6.8,kernel-source-2.6.9 - uses hosted environment compiler Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8,kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign #287867 kernel-image-2.6.10-powerpc Bug#287867: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc: Console mouse cursor (with gpm) behaves oddly in 2.6.9 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc' to `kernel-image-2.6.10-powerpc'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 2.4.26 -> 2.4.27
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 257591 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#257591: multiple cpqarrays do not work correctly with devfs Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 259308 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#259308: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386: feature-request SYSRQ is missing Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 259885 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#259885: tekram dc-390 driver doesn't work right Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 259892 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#259892: r8169 network driver broken Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 259909 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#259909: hangs on dell inspiron 8100 pcmcia Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 259911 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#259911: compaq presario 1220 fails to boot Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 264870 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#264870: radeonfb breaks the system Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > reassign 278504 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 Bug#278504: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386: piix module breaks access to ATAPI devices Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: abi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 283107 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp Bug#283107: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp: telnet-connections to some hosts fail Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296897: CAN-2005-0532: Buffer overflow in reiserfs_copy_from_user... on 64bit arches
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:38:49PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 > > Version: 2.6.8-13 > > Severity: critical > > Tags: security > > Justification: root security hole > > > > Cite: > > "The reiserfs_copy_from_user_to_file_region function in reiserfs/file.c for > > Linux kernel > > 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4, when running on 64-bit architectures, > > may allow local > > users to trigger a buffer overflow as a result of casting discrepancies > > between size_t and > > int data types." > > > > The offending code is also in 2.6.8. A fix is at > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The original advisory is at > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=full-disclosure&m=110846727602817&w=2 > > > > > > Please fix 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 as well. I have also looked at 2.4.27 but > > couldn't find any > > similar code. > > Thanks, that seems good to me. I will work on getting it into 2.4.8 and > 2.6.10, and also double-check 2.4.27. 2.6.9 is no longer maintained. Ditto for your other CAN reports. However, I am on the road at the moment and if I don't get to this today, it won't happen until next week. So if another kernel-team person wants to jump in, please do. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296897: CAN-2005-0532: Buffer overflow in reiserfs_copy_from_user... on 64bit arches
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 > Version: 2.6.8-13 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole > > Cite: > "The reiserfs_copy_from_user_to_file_region function in reiserfs/file.c for > Linux kernel > 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4, when running on 64-bit architectures, > may allow local > users to trigger a buffer overflow as a result of casting discrepancies > between size_t and > int data types." > > The offending code is also in 2.6.8. A fix is at > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The original advisory is at > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=full-disclosure&m=110846727602817&w=2 > > > Please fix 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 as well. I have also looked at 2.4.27 but > couldn't find any > similar code. Thanks, that seems good to me. I will work on getting it into 2.4.8 and 2.6.10, and also double-check 2.4.27. 2.6.9 is no longer maintained. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 279648 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#279648: kernel-source-2.6.9: Boot : console vga mode problem
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 280091 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#280091: kernel-source-2.6.9: build fails at early stage on Alpha
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 281209 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#281209: kernel-source-2.6.9: open("/dev/lp0", O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK) blocks
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 281439 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#281439: kernel: 2.6.9 has a regression from 2.6.8.1 in the i830 DRM module
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 281495 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#281495: SWSUSP: Time freezes when suspended
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 281517 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#281517: raw1394 and video1394 do not support udev
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 281912 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#281912: udev: Fails to re-created FireWire CDROM device node after
reconnecting
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282023 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282023: kernel-source-2.6.9: 6to4 tunnel interface cannot be freed on
shutdown, causing hang
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282059 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282059: kernel-source-2.6.9: Add multi-seat Ruby patch.
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282083 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282083: kernel-source-2.6.9: Add patch for Ruby: Multi-Seat Linux
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282088 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282088: kernel-source-2.6.9: Add vesafb-tng patch to Debian kernel
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282119 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282119: 2.6.9 kernel breaks kernel compilation
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282234 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282234: kernel-source-2.6.9: VesaFB doesn't work if compiled in statically
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282318 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282318: kernel-source-2.6.9: PDC202XX_FORCE should also depends on
BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282741 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282741: kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 282964 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#282964: allows inclusion of broken driver, breaking compile
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 283325 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#283325: kernel-source-2.6.9: DVD burning broken since 2.6.8; apply
cddvd-cmdfilter-drop.patch
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 283852 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#283852: not compiling ub.ko? breaks usb-storage
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 284600 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#284600: kernel-source-2.6.9: kernel 2.6.9 freezes when unmounting my USB
stick from nautilus (uhci, powerpc).
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 284680 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#284680: slower xine since 2.6.8->2.6.9 ?
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 286756 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#286756: udev gets tmpfs kernel support test wrong
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> re
Processed: abi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 284194 kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-sparc32 Bug#284194: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32: file missing for sparc32: include/asm-sparc/asm_offsets.h Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32' to `kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-sparc32'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 2.4.26 -> 2.4.27
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 246843 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#246843: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: No DRM with a ati radeon mobility but get it with 2.4.26 compiled "by hand" Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 249000 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#249000: (no subject) Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 252335 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#252335: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: "tc filter ls .." makes a kernel oops Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 257129 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#257129: kernel-image-2.4.26: Does not mount filesystems specified by label Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 265080 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#265080: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: recent 2.4.26-1 packaged kernels totally fsck console on Inspiron 8000 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 269156 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#269156: kernel-2.4.26 bug in shmem.c:581 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 270199 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#270199: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 270263 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#270263: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: sk98lin ethernet driver module is version 6.22 in distribution and does not work. Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 271699 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Bug#271699: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: update does not run lilo Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686'. > reassign 246897 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7 Bug#246897: ieee1394 problems in recent kernels Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7'. > reassign 250246 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7 Bug#250246: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: USB system broken Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7'. > reassign 259879 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7 Bug#259879: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: Problems loading module 8139cp Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: abi transition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 273062 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 Bug#273062: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64: scary warnings during partition check on machines with CMD646 chipsets Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64'. > reassign 277942 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 Bug#277942: issues with IPv6 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64'. > reassign 282597 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 Bug#282597: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64: please enable isdn modules Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc64' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296894: initrd-tools: function module_exist doesn't recognize modules in subdirs
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:30:16PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.77
> Severity: normal
>
> While playing around with virtual scsi drivers, I noticed that modules
> that are not directly located inside drivers/scsi where not found by
> the script.
>
> The attached patch solves this problem.
> --- mkinitrd 2005-01-23 19:37:41.0 +0100
> +++ mkinitrd.patched 2005-02-25 14:10:50.919976624 +0100
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
> }
>
> module_exists() {
> - [ -f "$MODULEDIR/kernel/$1.$o" ]
> + [ -n "$(find "$MODULEDIR/kernel/${1%%/*}" -name "${1##*/}.$o")" ]
> }
>
> print_module() {
That seems fair enough to me, my only reservation is speed.
Did you notice a significant slowdown when using this?
Also, could you be a litte more specific about which modules
are not being found, and where they are coming from?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NF_IP_ASSERT in dmesg
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Christian Christmann wrote: > Hi, > > some days ago I compiled the kernel 2.6.10 on my Debian Sarge box. > While booting I get two messages. > > 1) Loading module > af_packet > FATAL: module not found > > I couldn't figure out where to find the module in the kernel options. I believe that the option that you want is CONFIG_PACKET, as listed in net/Kconfig. > 2) The line > "NF_IP_ASSERT: > net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:1027(ip_conntrack_alter_reply)" > > repeats couple of times after my startup firewall script has been > executed. I will take a wild guess and say that packets connections that were established before your firewall script are passing through the firewall and causing this message. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296687: Problem Fixed
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:07:20AM -0800, David Lawyer wrote: > I fixed the problem by setting the parallel port in the BIOS from ECP to > SPP. Then the driver does software handshaking and my old printer works > OK. So this is a problem with documentation. I just emailed the > authors of the kernel docs on the parallel port and told them about this > fix. So you could close this bug if you want to, although it would be > nice if somehow the software configured it all. Hi David, are you suggesting that there should be a kernel option to restrict the modes that the parallel port driver will operate in - so that if you have older hardware it will only use modes supported by the other end. Or are you suggesting that the driver should autodetect this somehow. My knowledge of the relevant specs are weak (non-existant), but the latter sounds like it might not be possible. In any case, have you considered reporting this to LKML and the maintainers? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. > > Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd64) are > stuck in NEW since the beginning of the year, I personally would not > call this a replacement. This bug is about getting all the information about new and obsolete packages together so the ftp-maintainers can fix it up. Hopefully they will. If you have packages that are pending in NEW, please list them here. > > If you have > > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to > > speak up. > > with kernel-source-2.6.10 version 2.6.10-5 amd64 SMP systems got broken. > I am still investigating, it currently looks like > 083-x86_64_switch_mm_context_race.dpatch and > 084-smp_nmi_watchdog_race.dpatch introduced the breakage. Is this still broken? > > Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 > > Maintainer: Kernel Team > > Uploader: Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ack: none > > Yes, it can be dropped. > > As long als the NEW queue gets finally processed and all 2.6.10 packages > are added to the distribution. Understood. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:13:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. > > > > Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd64) are > > stuck in NEW since the beginning of the year, I personally would not > > call this a replacement. > > Well, you have to consider that the same guy going to remove the 2.6.9 kernels > also has the power to do the NEW processing for the missing kernels. Yes, so lets list them here to help that person to help us. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have > > > > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to > > > > speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. > > > > Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should > > > > be > > > > removed. > > > > > > Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 > > > kernel. > > > > Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. > > Yep, but not mentioned here. But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing. > > Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new > > against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? > > kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? > The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which will > obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the > kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i > got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, I take it that is what the recent discussions on debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. Is this correct? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:43:52AM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote: > These packages should be removed/added now. If anything was missed / > more needed to be done / other problems arise, please followup. Bug > closed with this message. Thanks, I think there might be a few more cobwebs/new packages out there, I will try and get them together and ping you again. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Austen wrote: > The package kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm is still in testing and probably should > be removed. Thanks, I have CCed the maintainer for his feedback. I have also CCed the bug so it is logged there. If you have any more information, please send it here. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272693: Same bug, additionnal information
Hello I am experiencing the same kind of bug as the problems stated in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272693 On my laptop Fujutsu-Siemens Amilo A 7600, same as there : http://koti.mbnet.fi/~keiky/misc/linux/amilo/amilo_linux.html hotplub hangs during boot when something is connected to the two inner ports (the outermost port works nice). I run sarge, my kernel is a 2.6.8 compiled from the kernel-source package (no patch applied). However, this may be the sign of e deeper bug. If I try to plug an usb device on the second port, I get something worryingly like a kernel oops: ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using address 2 irq 9: nobody cared! [] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90 [] note_interrupt+0x6c/0xa0 [] do_IRQ+0x121/0x130 [] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20 [] __do_softirq+0x30/0x80 [] acpi_irq+0x0/0x16 [] do_softirq+0x26/0x30 [] do_IRQ+0xfd/0x130 [] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20 handlers: [] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x16) Disabling IRQ #9 Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sun Feb 27 20:15:51 2005 ... localhost kernel: Disabling IRQ #9 I hope it may help you -- Mathieu Perona Waseda Hoshien æççåäå 03 (3205) 5424
Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well
According the upstream folks, this problem only is a problem with kernels that have been patched with the 4G/4G patch, which is not in the mainline. If Debian does not use that patch, then we can close this out and remove those patches, and I'll make a note of it in the CAN list. Here is the thread for reference: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1fd2bd7a57fac50c/197ace52b8cf3b8b Thanks, micah On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: > > I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either > > fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it > > has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not > > replaced here. As a result, I am not able to determine myself if > > 2.6.10 is also susceptible, but instead hope you can determine this. > > I think so too, it does not seem to have been applied upstream at all. > Do you want to ping LKML and find out if there is a reason why? > > In the mean time I will go ahead and add it to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10. > As for 2.4.27, i am not sure either. I will investigate further and > report back. > > -- > Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Floppy installation custom kernel support
This is a duplicate of a message I send on the 18th of Feb. I resend it because I did not get any response last time and the discussed subject is (IMHO) an important one; it can make things easier on the end-user side, it makes the installation procedure more charming and it sounds like an easy fix. --- Hello list, Installing sarge from the 20041118 net install floppies I noticed it seemed impossible to choose a custom build kernel in theb stage mentioned in 6.3.3.1 of http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/i386/ch06s03.html.en It says: As part of the installation, a Linux kernel will be installed. At the default priority, the installer will choose one for you that best matches your hardware. In lower priority modes, you will be able to choose from a list of available kernels. I had ofcourse chosen an expert install, since I'm having a little vakation and wanted to spend my time on this installation. But I couldn't find a way (not even by opening a rescue terminal and editting the target/etc/apt/sources.list to contain the source of my home-grown-kernel.deb... I think this can't be right and the function of 'officially' editting the sources.list should be inserted _before_ the picking of a boot-kernel. It would have saved me some work since the default kernel has a lot of dependencies and configurations my kernel has not, or even conflicts with (such as a /etc/lilo.conf telling the system to use an initial RAM disk). Is there a way I can put this missing function on a wishlist? I would like to see it included in the final version of the sarge net-install floppies... Kind regards, Jouke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297166: hard freeze when starting X
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 19:52 +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > can you please try booting with noexec=off? It locked up in the same place. Based on the corrupted ICE authority files from after it crashed, I think the crash happened between ICE and Enlightenment caching the pix directory. Also, I checked and the Radeon is not in DRI mode under 2.6.9. Agpgart is loaded and everything, but 32-bit X doesn't seem to like amd64 enough to be in DRI mode. Anything else I can try? Thank you, -s signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#268621: Reproducable in parts
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moin Joerg! > Joerg Schilling schrieb am Sonntag, den 27. Februar 2005: > > > If you like to have a decent CDDA extraction you need to use > > generic SCSI and this is done by using the SCSI address syntax > > instead of filnames. > > Oh my... > > man causality > man partial_order It is really bad to see that this poor person still has no clue and still refuses to read man pages :-( In order to find out whether this person is not the only one who has problems to understand simple facts, let me elaborate the previous mail... On 2005-02-26 Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dev=ATA and dev=/dev/hdX are definitely not supposed to do the same thing. Background is here that cdda2wav documents that dev=/dev/hdX tells cdda2wav to use "cooked audio ioctl's" like: ioctl(fd, CDROMREADTOCENTRY, ... instead of sending SCSI commands directly to the drive. man cdda2wav also tells you that most OS behave really bad with "cooked audio ioctl's" and for this reason recommends to enable to use Generic SCSI by using the SCSI address syntax together with the dev= option (e.g. dev=6,0). This resulted in a question: > What is the correct devicename on Linux 2.6, if I want DMA? And I did reply that I would expect to see DMA for all ways to send Generic SCSI commands on Linux and that the problem is that the Linux kernel developers refuse to fix the bugs that prevent DMA from happen with most interfaces. I also replied that a decent OS only needs one single interface to send Generic SCSI commands. Another questin was: > dev=ATA is not documented in cdda2wav(1) (from 2.01.01a01). Well, I was asuming that people know that all SCSI tools use libscg and in case a single man page does not contain _all_ information it makes sense to check other man pages (e.g. the man page from cdrecord). I also asume that Linux users _know_ what to do I am sorry but I am not responsible for the fact that the Linux kernel developers do not like to evolve an existing interface that would give thet best result but rather introduce new and unneeded new interfaces that include new bugs that are not fixed also.. > You try to force you own design ideas by any means (here: ignoring the > actual question and presenting your biased definition as a fact) and in > the same breath you accuse Linux kernel developers of not caring about > their users. Who t.f. do you expect to listen to you after a such > action? Well, in former times it was possible to see desigh ideas in the Linux kernel. This it no longer true since at least 2 years. What you see instead is total confusion. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED](work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: mkvmlinuz_13.dsc to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_13.dsc mkvmlinuz_13.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_13.tar.gz mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.deb to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.changes
mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mkvmlinuz_13.dsc mkvmlinuz_13.tar.gz mkvmlinuz_13_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processed: Re: Bug#292190: cannot enable DMA on nForce2 chipset
-- Vyacheslav O. Dementiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3_powerpc.changes is NEW
(new) kernel-build-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel build infrastructure for kernel version 2.4.27-apus . Together with kernel-headers-2.4.27-apus, this package provides the infrastructure for building additional modules for 2.4.27-apus (new) kernel-build-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel build infrastructure for kernel version 2.4.27-nubus . Together with kernel-headers-2.4.27-nubus, this package provides the infrastructure for building additional modules for 2.4.27-nubus kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-small_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-small_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-smp_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-smp_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-headers-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-headers-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb (new) kernel-headers-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Linux/nubus kernel headers. Read /usr/share/doc/kernel-headers-2.4.27-nubus/debian.README.gz for details. (new) kernel-headers-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Linux/nubus kernel headers. Read /usr/share/doc/kernel-headers-2.4.27-powerpc/debian.README.gz for details. kernel-image-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-image-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb (new) kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux/nubus kernel binary image. This package contains the Linux/nubus kernel image, the System.map file, and the modules built by the package. . This version is for NuBus Powermac computers. . Kernel image packages are generally produced using kernel-package, and it is suggested that you install that package if you wish to create a custom kernel from the sources. You will also need kernel-patch- (new) kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-small_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux/PowerPC kernel binary image for the powerpc-small flavour This package contains the Linux/PowerPC kernel image, the System.map file, and the modules built by the package. . This version contains the kernel images for use with miboot OldWorld PowerMac Machines. It should be used exclusively for debian-installer. You probably don't want this package, but kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc. . Kernel image packages are generally produced using kernel-package, and it is suggested that you install that package if you wish to create a custom kernel from the sources. You will also need kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc (new) kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-smp_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux/PowerPC kernel binary image for the powerpc-smp flavour This package contains the Linux/PowerPC kernel image, the System.map file, and the modules built by the package. . This version contains the kernel images for multiprocessor PowerPC machines, Using from the ppc601 upto the latest G4 class processors. . Kernel image packages are generally produced using kernel-package, and it is suggested that you install that package if you wish to create a custom kernel from the sources. You will also need kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc (new) kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux/PowerPC kernel binary image for the powerpc flavour This package contains the Linux/PowerPC kernel image, the System.map file, and the modules built by the package. . This version contains the kernel images for uniprocessor PowerPC machines, Using from the ppc601 upto the latest G4 class processors. . Kernel image packages are generally produced using kernel-package, and it is suggested that you install that package if you wish to create a custom kernel from the sources. You will also need kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb (new) kernel-patch-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Diffs to the kernel source for nubus The PowerPC kernel is maintained in a multitude of source trees separate from Linus Torvalds' official copy. This patch is based on the Linux/nubus tree from http://linux-nubus.sourceforge.net, which in turn is based on the BitKeeper tree used by most active PowerPC developers (See http://penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml for info). (new) kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Diffs to the kernel source for nubus The PowerPC kernel is maintained in a multitude of source trees separate from Linus Torvalds' official copy. This patch is based on the now abandoned linuxppc_2_4-benh tree. kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3.
Processing of kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3_powerpc.changes
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3.dsc kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-3.tar.gz kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-headers-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-patch-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-headers-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-nubus_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-headers-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-smp_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-smp_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-small_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.4.27-powerpc-small_2.4.27-3_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#297231: hotplug failure trying to load rtc on sis746 based machines
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 297231 kernel-image-2.6.10-i386 Bug#297231: hotplug failure trying to load rtc on sis746 based machines Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel-image-2.6.10-i386'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#297231: hotplug failure trying to load rtc on sis746 based machines
reassign 297231 kernel-image-2.6.10-i386 thanks On Feb 28, Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an FIC brand AMD K7 sis746 based mainboard and I've discovered that > /etc/hotplug/isapnp.rc determines that it needs to load the rtc driver and > that doesn't work, If it uses port 0x70 then it looks like an RTC chip to me... Maybe it needs a different kind of RTC driver? Does /dev/rtc work anyway? Probably matching on PNP0b00 is a bit rough, think of it a something better than unconditionally modprobing the driver at boot time. I'm reassigning this bug to a kernel package, if the kernel people think that this driver cannot deal with your hardware then just close it. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
