Processed: Re: Bug#311034: 'man mkinitrd' typo: managment
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 311034 +pending Bug#311034: 'man mkinitrd' typo: managment Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311034: 'man mkinitrd' typo: managment
tag 311034 +pending thanks On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:12:44PM -0400, A Costa wrote: Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.81.1 Severity: minor Tags: patch Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man5/mkinitrd.conf.5.gz', see attached '.diff'. Hope this helps... Indeed it does. I have put this change in SVN and it should appear in the next release to unstable. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311525: kernel-source-2.6.11: Cannot use kernel on Dell GX280 because tg3 removed
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:13:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Wed, 01 Jun 2005, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: I have Dell GX280 and because of removing tg3.c cannot use network. Is there any other solution like compiling modules (i.e. nvidia-source) or somebody just removed drivers because of his beleives? yeaah please either read other bug reports concerned by tg3 or read d-k there you find hints where do get those non-free bits. A slightly longer description of the problem as seen on http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00077.html This has been brought up and answered several times a week for the past few months. Its an unfortunate system but here is the situation: 1. There are some bits of code from upstream that can't be included in main, and thus kernel-image packages, because of licencing concerns. In a nutshell they aren't considered DFSG free. 2. These have been moved into the nonfree package mentioned earlier in the thread. This will be uploaded to debian. However, there are some concernes about the distibutability of some of the drivers in the package, and until that is all cleaned up it can't be uploaded. http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/kernel-source-nonfree-2.6.11/ 3. In the mean time anyone who needs those drivers has to tediously search the internet and find a message like this one linking to the URL, or use the Kernel.Org kernel. Clearly this sux and I sympathise with complaints about it, even though I am a member of the team that has created this mess. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel. Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave. I upgraded today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-386 version 2.6.8-13 to 2.6.8-16, and my network card (D-link 10/100 DFE-530TX) that is controlled by the via-rhine module immediately quit working Too bad this bug didn't get realized when -16 was in unstable... looks like it's too late to fix this for 3.1r0. True, there was some late minute package shiffling which meant that -16 ended up going straight into sarge. Unfortunately now we have this bug. A similar thing seems to have happened with 2.4.27 and some neftilter symbols. It partly my fault (in the sense that I uploaded the packages) and partly a process issue. I do appologise for any inconvenience and I'll try and get updates together over the next few days. But we have clearly missed the boat for 3.1r0. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says patch does not apply to pristine sources, which doesn't seem to be the case
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote: Hi, I am surprised by the package description which says: Note that these patches do NOT apply against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive. In fact, the patch applies to a pristine source without any errors. Maybe it should say Note that these patches are not intended to apply to a pristine... Anyone object to me making this change? I was going to suggest the same thing. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312127: i810_audio plays audio too slow
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:43:19PM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal for every second to third system boot,audio is played too slowly, like when you're playing a 44100 wave as 22050. removing and reinserting the module i810_audio fixes this. The 2.6.10 kernel is no longer supported by the kernel-team, can you please try 2.6.11? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311273: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8: Please configure Security Capatibilities as module
Hi ! Le mercredi 01 juin 2005 18:25 +0200, maximilian attems a crit : gain the pam knwonledge and fix it for debian. :) otherwise it will take a bit more time until someone else pops up and does it. It seams that people does it already: http://www.steamballoon.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rlimitsoldid=36 The fact seems to be: - PAM need to be patched and configured (/etc/security/limits.conf) - Kernel version = 2.6.12-rc4 Thanks you very much for you help. Romain.
Re: mkinitrd relative path
Hi dear initrd maintainers, I'd like to make notice of a few caveats with the /usr/sbin/mkinitrd (debian version 0.1.81.1) command. 1) email address in the script header does not make mention of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, so I contacted Herbert Xu which is not the maintainer for Debian. 2) bug with mkinitrd relative path I ran into trouble when using mkinitrd with relative path, example : mkinitrd -o ./my_file With this line the my_file is created into /tmp/mkinitrd.XXX/my_file Then gets deleted on mkinitrd exit :-( . It took me a while to debug and see that it's a CWD related issue. I may deliver a small patch that fix this issue (keep track of CWD) if you wish. Thanks for your attention. Have a nice day :) -- Alexandre Sauvé
Bug#312279: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc: System fails to boot with 2.4.27 installed
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:01:47PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: important I installed kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc on my system. After rebooting the system failed to boot with a kernel panic and something about killing init. (Sorry I don't remember the exact error, but it is the kind of error I get when it fails to mount my drive.) Directly before this I got a bunch of errors about my ide devices. The system does however boot 2.6.8 fine so I don't think it is a hardware problem. I'm sure you will need more info to diagnose this, so please let me know what you need. Hi, this is a bit vauge, can you provide more information on what errors you are seeing, and what devices you have (lspci -v). Also, I would say that if 2.6.8 is working, use that. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312335: PS/2 mouse not properly recognized on MSI KT4V mainboard
Package: kernel-image version: 2.6.8-2-k7 1) congratulations on the 3.1 release! I've been running Sarge on a number of machines and I love it! 2) This issue is one I should have reported some time ago. Sorry. It seems to affect the 2.6.7 and 2.6.8 kernels but not the earlier or later ones. I'm running a system with an MSI KT4V mainboard using an IOgear MiniView KVM switch. The KT4V seems to have a problem with the MiniView in that it will produce a keyboard error when I boot (except sometimes from a cold start) if I have that system selected - but not if I am watching a different system (go figure). This is generic to the KT4V because I have another KT4V-based system with the same problem, but other systems with different mainboards don't have this problem. This information is provided as background - I know there are issues with this KVM / Mainboard combination. The problem I'm having with the 2.6.8 kernel however is that when I boot the system with the KVM attached to the PS/2 mouse port, the mouse does not respond properly once X starts. It reacts to mouse movements in a random fashion. However, if I boot with a mouse attached directly to the PS/2 port, then switch to the KVM afterwards, the mouse behaves properly. I had also tried a number of workarounds including changing mouse parameters in X and adding a mouse parameter in Grub. The latter worked with the 2.6.7 kernel but not the 2.6.8 one. In the end, I had to go to Sid to get a newer kernel. This problem disappeared in the 2.6.9 kernel and is still absent in the 2.6.11 one which I am currently using (my only deviation from Sarge). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#312335: PS/2 mouse not properly recognized on MSI KT4V mainboard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 312335 kernel Bug#312335: PS/2 mouse not properly recognized on MSI KT4V mainboard Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312127: i810_audio plays audio too slow
Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2005 10:56 schrieb Horms: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:43:19PM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal for every second to third system boot,audio is played too slowly, like when you're playing a 44100 wave as 22050. removing and reinserting the module i810_audio fixes this. The 2.6.10 kernel is no longer supported by the kernel-team, can you please try 2.6.11? installed. please close this bug report, I'll open a new one if it happens again with 2.6.11. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mkinitrd relative path
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, Alexandre SAUVE wrote: Hi dear initrd maintainers, I'd like to make notice of a few caveats with the /usr/sbin/mkinitrd (debian version 0.1.81.1) command. 1) email address in the script header does not make mention of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, so I contacted Herbert Xu which is not the maintainer for Debian. fixed in svn 2) bug with mkinitrd relative path I ran into trouble when using mkinitrd with relative path, example : mkinitrd -o ./my_file With this line the my_file is created into /tmp/mkinitrd.XXX/my_file Then gets deleted on mkinitrd exit :-( . It took me a while to debug and see that it's a CWD related issue. I may deliver a small patch that fix this issue (keep track of CWD) if you wish. well we hope to switch soonest to initramfs, i'm not shure there will be new uploads for etch. Thanks for your attention. Have a nice day :) -- Alexandre Sauvé anyway thanks for your report -- maks
Bug#250243: marked as done (eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:30:17 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line sarge released has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2004 14:47:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 21 07:47:48 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from merkur.hrz.uni-giessen.de [134.176.2.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BRBJL-0007o3-00; Fri, 21 May 2004 07:47:48 -0700 Received: from [134.176.2.168] by merkur.hrz.uni-giessen.de with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:40 +0200 Received: from hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de (hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de [134.176.2.15]) by hermes2.hrz.uni-giessen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631FA1E1F5C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s1.stud.uni-giessen.de by hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:37 +0200 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by s1.stud.uni-giessen.de (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i4LElb102970 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:37 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: s1.stud.uni-giessen.de: s6688 owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:37 +0200 (MEST) From: Axel Rosenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner-Information: Passed JLUG virus check X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner: Found to be clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DRUGSPAM,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel Version: 2.2.20-compact Release: Debian 3.0 woody hi, i want to start a program on a remote computer over a local network. (to be displayed on my local machine.) shortly after beginning this program freezes and i got the following error message on my local machine: /var/log/kern.log: kernel: eth0: Initial media type 10baseT. kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. last message repeated 2 times last message repeated 31 times May 21 14:35:45 pc15-acacia last message repeated 26 times May 21 14:36:47 pc15-acacia last message repeated 30 times May 21 14:37:38 pc15-acacia last message repeated 28 times May 21 14:38:42 pc15-acacia last message repeated 3 times May 21 14:40:02 pc15-acacia kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. May 21 14:40:46 pc15-acacia last message repeated 16 times ... i have a 3com cyclone network card installed: 3c59x.c 18Feb01 Donald Becker and others http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html eth0: 3Com 3c900 Cyclone 10Mbps Combo at 0xcc00, 00:10:5a:d6:2c:6c, IRQ 10 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface. MII transceiver found at address 24, status 182d. and Version 2.2.5-11.5 of the libc6 librarys. axel --- Received: (at 250243-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 21:30:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 14:30:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfleE-9J-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:30:10 -0700 Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E74D5C011; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DfleM-00048g-0g; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 23:30:18 +0200 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:30:17 +0200 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sarge released Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: happy upgrading. :) if pain subsist with
Bug#262982: marked as done (kernel: socket ioctl fails in 32-bit binary running on IA64 with 32-bit libraries)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:30:17 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line sarge released
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 14:53:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 07:53:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from atlrel8.hp.com [156.153.255.206]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BreBs-0007y3-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 07:53:28 -0700
Received: from harvest.india.hp.com (harvest.india.hp.com [15.76.216.203])
by atlrel8.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E324094
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from VM12151 ([15.76.119.239])
by harvest.india.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_29774)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP
id UAA25596
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:26:37 +0530 (IST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Debian Bug Tracking System' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel: socket ioctl fails in 32-bit binary running on IA64 with
32-bit libraries
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:23:20 +0530
Organization: HP-ISO
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
X-UIDL: F6dd9RTad9Ud/!!lfU!!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Thread-Index: AcRz5w+flTSNoB9RQr6ot8fZwvnNPg==
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel
Version: N/A; reported 2004-07-27
Severity: serious
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux ovtaia4 2.4.17-mckinley-smp #1 SMP Tue May 14 21:57:05 MDT
2002 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
I found a problem when running a RPC program built on a IA32 system sunning
in 32-bit mode on Itanium platform. When I ran this program with strace,
it ended as EFAULT - Bad Address. This happens with SIOCGIFCONF ioctl call.
To test, I wrote a simple program with just this call as below:
#include stdio.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include sys/ioctl.h
#include net/if.h
#define MAX_IFS 32
char buf[sizeof(struct ifreq)*MAX_IFS];
int main() {
int sockfd;
struct ifreq *ifrp;
struct ifconf ifc;
sockfd = socket(PF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
if( sockfd 0 )
perror(socket);
ifc.ifc_len = sizeof( buf );
ifc.ifc_buf = (caddr_t)buf;
if (ioctl(sockfd, SIOCGIFCONF, (caddr_t)ifc) 0)
perror(ioctl (SIOCGIFCONF));
else
printf(Program completed without ioctl problems. :)\n);
return 0;
}
This resulted in:
ioctl (SIOCGIFCONF): Bad address
strace output (formated) :
...
...
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
ioctl(3, 0x8912, 0xbd7c)= -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
dup(2) = 4
fcntl64(4, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE)
brk(0) = 0x8049ac0
brk(0x8049c40) = 0x8049c40
brk(0x804a000) = 0x804a000
fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 2), ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
= 0x4001c000
_llseek(4, 0, 0xbbb8, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
write(4, ioctl (SIOCGIFCONF): Bad address..., 33ioctl (SIOCGIFCONF): Bad
address
) = 33
close(4)= 0
munmap(0x4001c000, 4096)= 0
_exit(0)= ?
On other Linux distributions with 2.4.18 kernel, this works fine on IPF
(the same 32-bit program). So I feel this is to do with the way kernel
handles this ioctl when a call comes from a 32-bit binary. And this needs
a patch (may be someone already has, I remember someone writing this in
some newsgroups).
Thanks.
Regards,
-- Sreedhar
---
Received: (at 262982-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 21:30:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 14:30:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfleE-9J-00; Tue, 07 Jun
Bug#312127: marked as done (i810_audio plays audio too slow)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:22:35 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312127: i810_audio plays audio too slow has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2005 19:41:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 05 12:41:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Df10D-0005KK-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 12:41:45 -0700 Received: from p54891d34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([127.0.0.1]) [84.137.29.52] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Df10C-0004Wu-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:41:45 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Strasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: i810_audio plays audio too slow X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 21:43:19 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal for every second to third system boot,audio is played too slowly, like when you're playing a 44100 wave as 22050. removing and reinserting the module i810_audio fixes this. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-6 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-7high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 312127-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 02:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 19:23:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfqDe-0004OS-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:23:02 -0700 Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100) id 6E50434031; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:54:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:22:35 +0900 From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stefan Strasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#312127: i810_audio plays audio too slow Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Cluestick: seven User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:37:08PM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote: Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2005 10:56 schrieb Horms: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:43:19PM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal for every second to third system boot,audio is played too slowly, like when you're playing a 44100 wave as 22050. removing and reinserting the module i810_audio fixes this. The 2.6.10 kernel is no longer supported by the kernel-team, can you please try 2.6.11? installed. please close this bug report, I'll open a new one if it happens again with 2.6.11. Done -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 310982 tags 310982 security thanks samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug in the kernel instead of in smbfs. Hi Steve, I'm kind of trying to read your mind here, but are you thinking of just making a kernel that doesn't do SMB_CAP_UNIX at all? I think the best answer is for the kernel to track whether uid,gid,fmask,dmask options were specified, and if so, to ignore the permission info sent by the CAP_UNIX-enabled server. That may require changes to the ioctl interface, though; I'd have to check again whether there's any distinction between not setting the option, and setting the option to 0. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says patch does not apply to pristine sources, which doesn't seem to be the case
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:37 +0900, Horms wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote: Hi, I am surprised by the package description which says: Note that these patches do NOT apply against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive. In fact, the patch applies to a pristine source without any errors. Maybe it should say Note that these patches are not intended to apply to a pristine... Anyone object to me making this change? I was going to suggest the same thing. committed. -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312279: Error Message
I am not physically in front of the system at the moment and I just discovered the person I was going to ask to record the exact error message and pass it on to me is away for a few days. As such it might take me a little longer to get you the exact error sorry. Thanks Jefferson Cowart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312279: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc: System fails to boot with 2.4.27 installed
(Sorry for the duplicate. Forgot to CC the bug before) $ lspci -v :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430FX - 82437FX TSC [Triton I] (rev 01) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64 :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX ISA [Triton I] (rev 02) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0 :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX IDE [Triton I] (rev 02) (prog-if 80 [Master]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64 I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16] :00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c764/765 [Trio32/64/64V+] (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 11 Memory at ff00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M] I'll get you the exact error message hopefully later today. In general I'm planning on using 2.6.8, but I was hoping to get 2.4.27 working so in the event I have some problem when I do an upgrade on 2.6.8 I have some other kernel around to fall back on. Thanks Jefferson Cowart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Horms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 03:09 To: Jefferson Cowart; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#312279: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc: System fails to boot with 2.4.27 installed On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:01:47PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: important I installed kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc on my system. After rebooting the system failed to boot with a kernel panic and something about killing init. (Sorry I don't remember the exact error, but it is the kind of error I get when it fails to mount my drive.) Directly before this I got a bunch of errors about my ide devices. The system does however boot 2.6.8 fine so I don't think it is a hardware problem. I'm sure you will need more info to diagnose this, so please let me know what you need. Hi, this is a bit vauge, can you provide more information on what errors you are seeing, and what devices you have (lspci -v). Also, I would say that if 2.6.8 is working, use that. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: draft of DebConf5 debian-kernel paper
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:18 +0900, Horms wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:06:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: hey, I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here: http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/ If you have time in the next couple of days, please take a look and tell me where I went wrong :) I tried to talk about both day-to-day type tasks, as well as some history and some notable stuff happening on the list lately (kernel freeze, ABI issues, unified source package, security support, firmware redistributability, etc). I'm very open to changes - new topics included. I think a number of people on this list will be there - if you'd like to co-present on one of these topics (or one I didn't mention), let me know. Horms: I listed you as an author in this draft because I stole some content directly from a couple of your .au slides; let me know if you'd prefer I didn't. Sure thats fine, though I am not sure I convinced enough to be a co-author. You had some good content that I included nearly verbatim. BTW, I am still planning to go to DebConf (mmm, should arrange tickets) and so if you are intereted, to co-present this paper. I am indeed interested; I was thinking it'd be cool to do something panel-like. i.e., a presentation with a group of available -kernel folk available to handle questions participate in discussion points of interest. Though, there maybe enough content (and hopefully enough interest) that we put together an ad hoc BOF after the presentation. Let me know what you think. -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
