Sarge with HP LH6000

2005-08-05 Thread liu wei



I'am having a problem with installing Debian Sarge 3.1 on my HP LH6000 
server. The problem in my opinion is that sarge doesn't detectthe 
megaraid controller on my system. Is there a special boot optionto 
install Sarge, 
or how can i install sarge on my system



Bug#67718: disappearance

2005-08-05 Thread Julie Woodall
ALERT: Initial Notification

According to our records, you or your spouse completed one of our applications 
within the past year.

Although you were not accepted initially we are now happy to present you with 
three different deals.

Remember, there is absolutely No obligation on your part and past credit is a 
non-issue.

Please validate your information with our secure/private database to ensure our 
records are accurate.

http://www.loanszx.com/index.php?refid=windsor

Thank You and Good Day

Sincerely,

Julie Woodall
Customer Service Rep
e-LMRi INC

If this reached you in error please let our office know so we can take you off 
the list:
http://www.loanszx.com/r.php






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321401: CAN-2005-2456: Array index overflow in xfrm code

2005-08-05 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security patch

An overflow in sock-sk_policy could possibly be exploited as DoS or
potential execution of arbitrary code. Please see
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg00520.html
for details. A fix has been comitted into the git repo, please see
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a4f1bac62564049ea4718c4624b0fadc9f597c84

This has been assigned CAN-2005-2456.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321403: 8139too network driver won't work with my card (it did with 2.6.8)

2005-08-05 Thread Csillag Kristof
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: important

Hi there!

When I tried to upgrade my kernel from 2.6.8 to 2.6.11, 
I was shocked to see that my Ethernet card stopped working.

I am using the standard Debian kernel sources to build my own kernels.

I tested kernel-source-2.6.10, and (because kernel-source-2.6.9 is no longer
in Debian) the vanilla linux-2.6.9 from kernel.org, and neither of them worked.

So it seems the thing broke from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9.

  * * *
  
My card is: (lspci output on 2.6.8)

:00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)

The 2.6.8 kernel says this, then loading the driver:

8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.27
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xe281c000, 00:20:18:8d:3d:40, IRQ 10
eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139B'

With, 2.6.11, at first it seems to be OK, too:

eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xe2a38000, 00:20:18:8d:3d:40, IRQ 10
eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139B'
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1

...but when I try to send out data, it says:

NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005 c07f media 00.
eth0: Tx queue start entry 4  dirty entry 0.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 0 is 0008a156. (queue head)
eth0:  Tx descriptor 1 is 0008a156.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 2 is 0008a156.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 3 is 0008a156.
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1

   * * *
   
Since until this is resolved, I am stucked to 2.6.8, I am very eager to help you
debugging this. Please tell me how can I help you to fix this.


Kristof Csillag




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.11 depends on:
(irrelevant)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321409: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21

2005-08-05 Thread debian-user
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: important


My machine freezes occationally for several seconds, with
dma_timer_expiry  messages being printed to /var/log/messages:

Apr  6 09:47:33 localhost kernel: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
Apr  6 09:47:44 localhost kernel: hda: DMA timeout error
Apr  6 09:47:44 localhost kernel: hda: dma timeout error: status=0xd0 {
Busy }
Apr  6 09:47:44 localhost kernel:
Apr  6 09:47:44 localhost kernel: hda: DMA disabled
Apr  6 09:47:44 localhost kernel: ide0: reset: success

The error occurs about once a day on my current kernel and
with linux-image-2.6.11 non-smp.

With 2.6.9 and .10 kernels, I got this problem much more frequently --
right  *past* the point where I give up working on the machine.

This problem is also described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132584

I have a Dell Inspiron 500m with a ICH4 controller:

Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ICH4: IDE controller at PCI slot :00:1f.1
PCI: Enabling device :00:1f.1 (0005 - 0007)
ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:1f.1[A] - GSI 11 (level, low) - IRQ 11
ICH4: chipset revision 1
ICH4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
hda: IC25N030ATMR04-0, ATA DISK drive
Using anticipatory io scheduler
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hda: max request size: 1024KiB
hda: 58605120 sectors (30005 MB) w/1740KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63,
UDMA(100)
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 p4
hdc: SAMSUNG CDRW/DVD SN-324F, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321403: kernel 2.6.12.3 does not work either

2005-08-05 Thread Csillag Kristof
Hi there!

I tested with the vanilla 2.6.12.3, and it does not work either.

The relevant output of kernel is this:

eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xe0802000, 00:20:18:8d:3d:40, IRQ 10
eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139B'

...

eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005 c07f media 00.
eth0: Tx queue start entry 4  dirty entry 0.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 0 is 0008a156. (queue head)
eth0:  Tx descriptor 1 is 0008a156.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 2 is 0008a156.
eth0:  Tx descriptor 3 is 0008a156.
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1

Kristof



signature.asc
Description: Ez az üzenetrész	 digitális aláírással van	ellátva


Bug#321419: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: irq11 makes eth0 problems

2005-08-05 Thread Philippe BOURCIER
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: important


hi all,

I reported similar problem with 2.6.11 (see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303550 ).

first of all, reportbug complained:

Getting status for linux-image-2.6.12-1-686...
Verifying package integrity...
There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.12-1-686;
the following files appear to be missing or changed:
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.pcimap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.dep
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.ieee1394map
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.usbmap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.isapnpmap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.alias
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 file 
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/modules.symbols
Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? y

now, the problem:

dmesg:

:07:17 UTC 2005
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 BIOS-e801:  - 0009f000 (usable)
 BIOS-e801: 0010 - 0800 (usable)
0MB HIGHMEM available.
128MB LOWMEM available.
On node 0 totalpages: 32768
  DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
  Normal zone: 28672 pages, LIFO batch:15
  HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
DMI not present.
Allocating PCI resources starting at 0800 (gap: 0800:f800)
Built 1 zonelists
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda2 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr vga=791 noapic 
acpi=off ro 
Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with lapic
mapped APIC to d000 (01101000)
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 10, 16384 bytes)
Detected 300.805 MHz processor.
Using tsc for high-res timesource
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Memory: 121528k/131072k available (1728k kernel code, 8928k reserved, 721k 
data, 180k init, 0k highmem)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
Calibrating delay loop... 591.87 BogoMIPS (lpj=295936)
Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0183f9ff     
 
CPU: After vendor identify, caps: 0183f9ff     
 
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 512K
CPU: After all inits, caps: 0183f9ff   0040  
 
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU: Intel Pentium II (Deschutes) stepping 02
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (bad gzip magic numbers); looks like 
an initrd
Freeing initrd memory: 4820k freed
NET: Registered protocol family 16
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xeb080, last bus=0
PCI: Using configuration type 1
mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050309
ACPI: Interpreter disabled.
Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay
pnp: PnP ACPI: disabled
PnPBIOS: Scanning system for PnP BIOS support...
PnPBIOS: Found PnP BIOS installation structure at 0xc00ff020
PnPBIOS: PnP BIOS version 1.0, entry 0xec000:0x3d18, dseg 0xec000
PnPBIOS: 19 nodes reported by PnP BIOS; 19 recorded by driver
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
Boot video device is :00:02.0
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/7110] at :00:07.0
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0xcf8-0xcff could not be reserved
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0x3f0-0x3f1 has been reserved
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0x3f3-0x3f3 has been reserved
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0x3f7-0x3f7 has been reserved
pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0x1000-0x107f could not be reserved
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
devfs: 2004-01-31 Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
devfs: boot_options: 0x0
Initializing Cryptographic API
Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers.
isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards...
isapnp: No Plug  Play device found
PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303,PNP0f13] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 48 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM 

Processed: Re: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: Does not detect builtin MPU of via82C686

2005-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 319789 moreinfo
Bug#319789: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: Does not detect builtin MPU of via82C686
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315326: marked as done (kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7: make-kpkg modules_image do not generate)

2005-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:23:24 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line new linux image package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 22:40:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 15:40:17 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkrPl-0006HP-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:40:17 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1566182wra
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;

b=YN/Q+6WeLIxBjaq3I64FD4VvLxRHsmAVLWgIQngTZD6iYi98YJ2BgFCOvH1s8mEhWoFomNgKGo39rAEiazSoLcxwfVjXshVLb1x6jXzwcta1sRxovdjp3UCs82m0ViaO8bqfAVvz3oEAw7WbdnntCIHsXtz6mJ+kSNEoBAGetkM=
Received: by 10.54.73.15 with SMTP id v15mr63367wra;
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.40.36 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:40:16 -0300
From: Rodrigo Colao Merlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Rodrigo Colao Merlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7: make-kpkg modules_image do not generate
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary==_Part_2442_3846597.1119393616094
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--=_Part_2442_3846597.1119393616094
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7
Severity: normal

The command make-kpkg modules_image do not generate modules to specific=
=20
-k7 kernel_image package.

An example is nvidia module. I use nvidia-kernel-source package and generat=
e=20
modules with above command, this work
for kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-k7 package, but it doesn't work for this package=
.

please take a look. Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=3Dpt_BR, LC_CTYPE=3Dpt_BR (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

--=_Part_2442_3846597.1119393616094
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7br
Severity: normalbr
br
The command quot;make-kpkg modules_imagequot; do not generate modules to =
specific -k7 kernel_image package.br
br
An example is nvidia module. I use nvidia-kernel-source package and generat=
e modules with above command, this workbr
for kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-k7 package, but it doesn't work for this package=
.br
br
please take a look. Thanks.br
br
-- System Information:br
Debian Release: testing/unstablebr
nbsp; APT prefers unstablebr
nbsp; APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')br
Architecture: i386 (i686)br
Shell:nbsp; /bin/sh linked to /bin/bashbr
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7br
Locale: LANG=3Dpt_BR, LC_CTYPE=3Dpt_BR (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)brbr

--=_Part_2442_3846597.1119393616094--

---
Received: (at 315326-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 14:23:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 07:23:34 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E136k-0004Yp-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:23:34 -0700
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id BB5525C010; Fri,  5 Aug 2005 16:23:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:23:24 +0200
From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new linux image package
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 

Bug#319789: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: Does not detect builtin MPU of via82C686

2005-08-05 Thread Maximilian Attems
tags 319789 moreinfo
thanks

does the pain subsist with the linux-image 2.6.12?

please send in the output of lspci?

thanks for your feedback.


--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#310415: sovled

2005-08-05 Thread Maximilian Attems
reassing 310415 kernel-package
stop

i guess that may already be solved with latest 2.6.12 linux-image package?

--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308941: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cpio error installing package)

2005-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:17:36 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cpio error installing package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 11:47:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 04:47:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 81-172-35-36.usuarios.retecal.es (burgos) [81.172.35.36] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWYdA-0004ko-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 04:47:00 -0700
Received: by burgos (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 787097B4D1; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?F=E9lix_Blanco?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cpio error installing package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:48:19 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7
Version: 2.6.11-3
Severity: normal

The following error is displayed when installing the package:

Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7.
(Reading database ... 278900 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7 (from
.../kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7_2.6.11-3_i386.deb) ...
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7 (2.6.11-3) ...
cpio:   /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fea000): No such file or directory
cpio: (0xe000): No such file or directory
/initrd.img does not exist. Installing from scratch, eh?
Or maybe you don't want a symbolic link here. Hmm? Lets See.
/vmlinuz does not exist. Installing from scratch, eh?
Or maybe you don't want a symbolic link here. Hmm? Lets See.

The same problems shows up in kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7-smp


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities 
ii  initrd-tools  0.1.78 tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 308941-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 14:17:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 07:17:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1318-0003jQ-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:17:46 -0700
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 4F2D65C010; Fri,  5 Aug 2005 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:17:36 +0200
From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cpio error installing package
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

please reopen if the pain subist?


--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321442: kernel-source-2.6.8: fails to compile on powerpc (drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c)

2005-08-05 Thread LT-P
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: normal

The kernel-source-2.6.8 sources fail to compile on powerpc (PowerMac 4400).

___
CC  drivers/ide/ide.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-default.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-io.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-iops.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-lib.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-probe.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-dma.o
CC  drivers/ide/ide-proc.o
CC  drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.o
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c: Dans la fonction « pmac_ide_dma_read »:
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:1951: error: `ide_dma_intr' undeclared (first use in 
this function)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:1951: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported 
only once
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:1951: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c: Dans la fonction « pmac_ide_dma_write »:
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:1982: error: `ide_dma_intr' undeclared (first use in 
this function)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c: Dans la fonction « pmac_ide_setup_dma »:
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:2157: error: `__ide_dma_off_quietly' undeclared (first 
use in this function)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:2158: error: `__ide_dma_on' undeclared (first use in 
this function)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:2167: error: `__ide_dma_verbose' undeclared (first use 
in this function)
drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:2168: error: `__ide_dma_timeout' undeclared (first use 
in this function)
make[3]: *** [drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/ide] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
___

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-ltp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.8 depends on:
ii  binutils  2.16.1-2   The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2 1.0.2-8high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities 

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.8 recommends:
ii  gcc 4:3.3.5-3The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  make3.80-9   The GNU version of the make util

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#310415: sovled

2005-08-05 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
reassing 310415 kernel-package
thanks

This wasn't sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)

On 05/08/05 16:15 +0200, Maximilian Attems said ...
 reassing 310415 kernel-package
 stop
 
 i guess that may already be solved with latest 2.6.12 linux-image package?
 
 --
 maks

Giridhar

-- 
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: sovled

2005-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 310415 kernel-package
Bug#310415: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: debsums warnings about mismatching 
checksum on 2.6.11-5 after upgrading from 2.6.11-3
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686' to `kernel-package'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Patch] ppc32: stop misusing ntps time_offset value

2005-08-05 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:16:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
 Hi Marcelo,
 
 is this appropriate for 2.4? It seems to apply cleanly to 
 your current git tree.

Yep looks simple enough, thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Processed: Re: sovled

2005-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 310415  kernel
Bug#310415: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: debsums warnings about mismatching 
checksum on 2.6.11-5 after upgrading from 2.6.11-3
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `kernel'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Processed: Re: sovled

2005-08-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
reassign 310415  kernel
thanks

Hi,

These files are generated by depmod, and thus, shall change
 every time the user (or a third party module) runs depmod. Not
 running depmod early has its own problems, and there is a reason we
 ship these files in the image. 

So, when we call dh_md5sum (as I believe happens in various
 places in linux-2.6's debian/rules, including
 debian/templates/postinstall.in), care must be taken to exclude these
 files. 

make-kpkg never calls dh_md5sum, or equivalent, so this is not
 where the fix must be applied. Sending to the appropriate package.

manoj
-- 
Many a bum show has been saved by the flag. George M. Cohan
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321508: oops loading ide-generic with 2.6.12 kernel in d-i

2005-08-05 Thread Joey Hess
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

My main d-i test machine is a proliant DL360, and I'm running d-i on it.
With the 2.6.12 kernel I get a new kernel oops when the ide-generic
module is loaded. 

Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: SvrWks CSB5: IDE controller at PCI slot :00:0f.1
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: SvrWks CSB5: chipset revision 147
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: SvrWks CSB5: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: SvrWks CSB5: simplex device: DMA forced
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0x2000-0x2007, BIOS settings: 
hda:pio, hdb:pio
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: general protection fault:  [#1]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: Modules linked in: ide_generic pdc202xx_new aec62xx 
alim15x3 amd74xx atiixp cmd64x cs5520 cs5530 cy82c693 generic hpt34x ns87415 
opti621 pdc202xx_old piix rz1000 sc1200 siimage sis5513 slc
90e66 triflex trm290 via82cxxx floppy usb_storage scsi_mod serverworks ide_core 
usbserial usbhid usbkbd ohci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan unix
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: CPU:0
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: EIP:0060:[f8820073]Not tainted VLI
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246   (2.6.12-1-386) 
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: EIP is at 0xf8820073
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: eax:    ebx: f88ac520   ecx: 3068   edx: 
3068
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: esi:    edi: f883cbda   ebp:    esp: 
f6e2bf04
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: Process insmod (pid: 4084, threadinfo=f6e2a000 
task=f6a36520)
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: Stack: f883bb1f f88ac520 f88ac520 f883cbb8 f889d939 
f88ac520   
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:005a   f883cbb8 dff7e000 
f889da77 dff7e000 f883cbb8 
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: f6e2bf78 01f7e000  f883cbb8 
dff7e000 c000 f6e2a000 
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: Call Trace:
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f883bb1f] init_hwif_svwks+0xcc/0x151 [serverworks]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f889d939] ide_pci_setup_ports+0x116/0x14c [ide_core]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f889da77] do_ide_setup_pci_device+0x108/0x114 
[ide_core]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f889da9b] ide_setup_pci_device+0x18/0x7d [ide_core]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f889dc1a] ide_scan_pcidev+0x27/0x4c [ide_core]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f889dc6e] ide_scan_pcibus+0x2f/0x95 [ide_core]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [f8907005] ide_generic_init+0x5/0x12 [ide_generic]
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [c0127f33] sys_init_module+0xb8/0x176
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel:  [c0102e85] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Aug  5 22:20:44 kernel: Code: 6b 63 72 63 74 61 62 5f 69 64 65 5f 64 6d 61 5f 
73 70 65 65 64 00 5f 5f 6b 73 74 72 74 61 62 5f 69 64 65 5f 64 6d 61 5f 73 70 
65 65 64 00 5f 5f 6b 73 79 6d 74 61 62 5f 69 64 65 5f 64 6d 61 5f 

I'd forgotten this thing has a serverworks ide controller in it; the main
controller is a cciss hardware raid. So this ide controller only drives the CD
drive. 

Anyway, after this lsmod shows ide-generic is loaded, but apparently the
modprobe ide-generic fails, and this breaks my automated install
testing.

I've attached the full kernel log, in which you can also see some
unrelated bonus fun, including a backtrace from Device 'i82365.0' does
not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed..

I'll also attach the d-i hardware-summary file, which has some possibly
useful info like PCI ids.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information

-- 
see shy jo
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: klogd started: BusyBox v1.00 (Debian 1:1.00-4)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: Linux version 2.6.12-1-386 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc 
version 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)) #1 Wed Jul 20 21:34:15 UTC 2005
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820:  - 0009f400 (usable)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0009f400 - 000a 
(reserved)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 
(reserved)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0010 - bfffa000 (usable)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: bfffa000 - c000 (ACPI 
data)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 
(reserved)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee1 
(reserved)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:  BIOS-e820: ffc0 - 0001 
(reserved)
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used.
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: Use a HIGHMEM enabled kernel.
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: 896MB LOWMEM available.
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: found SMP MP-table at 000f4fd0
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 229376
Aug  5 22:16:30 kernel:   DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
Aug  5 

Re: linux-2.6 - subarch and patches

2005-08-05 Thread Jurij Smakov

On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:


Hi folks

linux-2.6 currently supports something called subarch. It should be
used for incompatible patches. This is needed for m68k and I think mips.

Problems with this
- mostly unimplemented,


I can't say that I have extensively tested the subarch cases, but I 
definitely had it in mind, and I'd rather describe its state as very 
poorly tested than mostly unimplemented :-)



- namingschema differs from anything else: linux-image-$subarch-2.6-$flavour.

Proposal:
Replace with patch definitions.

- Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image
 package may specify another patch, it may shared between more than one
 image.


There is actually code for that in $(kdir) target in debian/Makefile:

patches  := $(wildcard patches-arch/$(subarch).*)
patches  += $(wildcard patches-arch/$(subarch)_*)
patches  += $(wildcard patches-arch/$(karch).*)
patches  += $(wildcard patches-arch/$(karch)_*)
patches  := $(strip $(patches))
[...]
$(kdir): post-install-$(subarch) $(wildcard templates/control.*.in)
[...]
if [ -n '$(patches)' ]; then\
  cd $(tkdir);  \
  cat $(addprefix ../,$(patches)) | patch -p1;  \
fi

Definitely there is room for improvement, but your proposal is (at least 
partially) implemented.



- Generated packages:
 - Patches:
   - linux-patch-debian-$version (the same than now)
   - linux-patch-debian-$version-$arch
   - linux-patch-debian-$version-$arch-$name


With the common source package I see absolutely no reason to split the 
patches up. And the code which will collect all the arch/subarch specific
patches and put it into a single linux-patch-debian package is already 
there.



 - Header:
   Any of the package contains the same, just with the patches applied.


That is also taken into account already: the subarch-specific header 
packages are built (or rather, would be built) from the patched tree, so 
all the header files are correct.



   If we have want to code something more, we may produce packages
   which just links most of the files to the more generic version.
   - linux-headers-$version-$abiname (as known)
   - linux-headers-$version-$abiname-$arch
   - linux-headers-$version-$abiname-$arch-$name


I don't have any objections to this naming scheme (generally, I don't care 
about naming so much :-). The only thing which in my opinion _must_ be 
guaranteed, is that running


apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)

will install the full set of packages for the currently running kernel. If 
you have a clear picture on how to do that in your naming scheme, just go 
ahead and make the necessary changes.



- linux-header-$version-$abiname-$flavour depends against the main
 header package which the correct patches.

Bastian


It turns out that I will not be available on Saturday to discuss these 
things, sorry about that. Hopefully we can talk on Sunday.


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#120116: Designed to Provide the necessary steps to Elimiinate all debbt.

2005-08-05 Thread earlean sanders
Do away with everything you owe without paying another dime.  End the calls,
End the payments!

As it turns out most lendors are doing something illegal. Unbelievable but
true!

Join us for in-depth details about our system at 0 charge or obligation.
You have nothing to lose and plenty to gain.

http://uk.geocities.com/redzam_udio/?o=f.Don’t_make_another_payment
Above for more information or to stop receiving or to see our address.


When he recovered himself the Demon of Electricity had disappeared. Rob's
heart was very light as he left the workshop and made his way down the attic
stairs
Some people might think I was a fool to give up those electrical
inventions, he reflected; but I'm one of those persons who know when they've
had enough


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: linux-2.6 - subarch and patches

2005-08-05 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
 I don't have any objections to this naming scheme (generally, I don't care 
 about naming so much :-). The only thing which in my opinion _must_ be 
 guaranteed, is that running
 
 apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)
 
 will install the full set of packages for the currently running kernel.

Fun, yet another thing in the common package which doesn't work for
mips (mipsel machines have mips as uname).


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]