Re: linux-2.6 - patches
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: - Always specify correct -m32/-m64. Is there any practical reason to do that? Look at the amd64 packages. Can't see anything special. They are just using the gcc-4.0, as far as i can tell... As I understand, currently kernel-package takes care of that, so I'd rather see the compiler checks moved there. make-kpkg can't do that properly. Well, it does now, doesn't it? And I would rather see the changes go into the kernel-package, because if we'll start to fiddle too much with the compiler options, it will be harder for the users to build the correct images just using linux-source. - Always build asm-offsets.s in the prepare target. There is currently no prepare target in debian/rules. Can you give some more details? Look into arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile. Anything that will make the situation with asm-offsets.s is, of course, welcome. This file needs to be included into the headers package. It is currently included. However as it is only created during the kernel image build, we have to check after building every flavour and copy it in place, if necessary. This is done in build-stamp-$(subarch)-% target in debian/Makefile. What do you have in mind? Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80878: yo
Stick it in a few more inches next time you bang.. http://www.canyoutakeitalltrooper.com --- if you don't want to recieve these anymore let our office knowby going here http://www.canyoutakeitalltrooper.com/1m/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - patches
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:31:33AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: - Always specify correct -m32/-m64. Is there any practical reason to do that? Look at the amd64 packages. Can't see anything special. They are just using the gcc-4.0, as far as i can tell... bin/amd64-linux-* It is currently included. However as it is only created during the kernel image build, You have not read the makefiles. It is built in the prepare target for any expect the two names architectures. we have to check after building every flavour and copy it in place, if necessary. This is done in build-stamp-$(subarch)-% target in debian/Makefile. What do you have in mind? I'll remove that hack in the near future as it will not longer work in -4. Bastian -- A woman should have compassion. -- Kirk, Catspaw, stardate 3018.2 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309308: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Horms wrote: There is no public CVE assignment for this issue. If's it easily reproducable for non-root, it might account as a local DoS vulnerability. mii-tool's IOCTL is only allowed by root. The remote DoS comes from the fact that snmpd will call this IOCTL when it gets a request for the interface statistics. So it's exploitable via SNMP if the exploiter has access to the SNMP tree in question. (Which is not the default, if I recall correctly?) However, this means that cricket will bone the machine during the boot process, or soon after. I think thats a strong enough reason to tag it as a security fix, and thus include it in a kernel security update. Hi Horms, this is now CAN-2005-2548. Can you please add it to the changelog? Of course. Its in now. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.4.27-10: isofs driver ignore some parameters with mount
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
Sample:
mount -t isofs -o uid=100,iocharset=koi8-r,gid=100 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
gid=100 - was ignored
I look in source and find that problem. I make two patch, simply and full
(what addeded some functionality - ignore wrong mount parameters)
Thanks,
I will try and get the simple version of this patch into the next
Sarge update.
I have also CCed Marcelo and the LKML for their consideration,
as this problem still seems to be present in the lastest 2.4 tree.
--
Horms
simply patch:
===
--- kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-05-19 13:29:39.0
+0300
+++ kernel-source/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-11 11:55:12.0 +0300
@@ -340,13 +340,13 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map = 'a';
else return 0;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99) return 0;
popt-session=ivalue+1;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512) return 0;
===
full patch:
===
--- kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-05-19 13:29:39.0
+0300
+++ kernel-source/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-11 11:50:56.0 +0300
@@ -327,10 +327,11 @@
popt-iocharset = value;
while (*value *value != ',')
value++;
- if (value == popt-iocharset)
- return 0;
*value = 0;
- } else
+ if (value == popt-iocharset){
+ printk(Invalid or missed
parameter:%s=%s,\n,this_char,value);
+ }
+ }
#endif
if (!strcmp(this_char,map) value) {
if (value[0] !value[1] strchr(ano,*value))
@@ -338,28 +339,30 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,off)) popt-map = 'o';
else if (!strcmp(value,normal)) popt-map = 'n';
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map = 'a';
- else return 0;
+ else printk(Invalid or missed
parameter:%s=%s,\n,this_char,value);
}
if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
- if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99) return 0;
- popt-session=ivalue+1;
+ if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99)
+ printk(Invalid or missed
parameter:%s=%s,\n,this_char,value);
+ else popt-session=ivalue+1;
}
if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
- if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512) return 0;
- popt-sbsector=ivalue;
+ if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512)
+ printk(Invalid or missed
parameter:%s=%s,\n,this_char,value);
+ else popt-sbsector=ivalue;
}
- else if (!strcmp(this_char,check) value) {
+ if (!strcmp(this_char,check) value) {
if (value[0] !value[1] strchr(rs,*value))
popt-check = *value;
else if (!strcmp(value,relaxed)) popt-check = 'r';
else if (!strcmp(value,strict)) popt-check = 's';
- else return 0;
+ else printk(Invalid or missed
parameter:%s=%s,\n,this_char,value);
}
- else if (!strcmp(this_char,conv) value) {
+ if (!strcmp(this_char,conv) value) {
/* no conversion is done anymore;
we still accept the same mount options,
but ignore them */
@@ -368,22 +371,24 @@
Re: kernel 2.4.27-10: isofs driver ignore some parameters with mount
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
Sample:
mount -t isofs -o uid=100,iocharset=koi8-r,gid=100 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
gid=100 - was ignored
I look in source and find that problem. I make two patch, simply and full
(what addeded some functionality - ignore wrong mount parameters)
Thanks,
I will try and get the simple version of this patch into the next
Sarge update.
I have also CCed Marcelo and the LKML for their consideration,
as this problem still seems to be present in the lastest 2.4 tree.
--
Horms
Marcelo and LKML, here is a rediff of the simple version of the patch
from Alexander Pytlev that I forwarded previously. The whitespace in his
version had been munged.
I haven't tested it, but it looks like it should resolve the problem
Alexander reported that mount parameters after iocharset, map and
session are ignored.
This should apply against current 2.4 git. I took a peek into 2.6, and
the code there has seems to have been completely restructured.
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- fs/isofs/inode.c.orig 2005-08-12 17:33:31.0 +0900
+++ fs/isofs/inode.c2005-08-12 17:33:38.0 +0900
@@ -340,13 +340,13 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map = 'a';
else return 0;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99) return 0;
popt-session=ivalue+1;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512) return 0;
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: 8139too network driver won't work with my card (it did with 2.6.8)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 321403 linux-2.6 Bug#321403: 8139too network driver won't work with my card (it did with 2.6.8) Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.11' to `linux-2.6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#322205: udev: vol_id crashes on usb storage device
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:50:41AM +0200, Erhard Schultchen wrote: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Erhard, your initial bug report states that after pluging in your cammera, vol_id is executed (presumably the result of a kernel-generated hotplug event) and it segfaults. After this happens your camera is unusable until after you reinsert it. Could you please describe what happens after you reinsert it. Hi, as long as usbmount is in place to execute vol_id, the I/O errors occur again. With until I plug it in again I referred to the fact the device isn't readable anymore after vol_id ran. The flash drive can be accessed normally when usbmount / vol_id is disabled, so I guess the problem is something that vol_id does but mount does not. I did not try to format the drive so far. Thanks. Do you have any idea what exactly usbmount / vol_id is trying to mount. And if so, does trying to do that manually put the camera in a state where you can't mount anything until you reconnect? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#322205: udev: vol_id crashes on usb storage device
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Erhard, your initial bug report states that after pluging in your cammera, vol_id is executed (presumably the result of a kernel-generated hotplug event) and it segfaults. After this happens your camera is unusable until after you reinsert it. Could you please describe what happens after you reinsert it. Hi, as long as usbmount is in place to execute vol_id, the I/O errors occur again. With until I plug it in again I referred to the fact the device isn't readable anymore after vol_id ran. The flash drive can be accessed normally when usbmount / vol_id is disabled, so I guess the problem is something that vol_id does but mount does not. I did not try to format the drive so far. Regards, Erhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321403: 8139too network driver won't work with my card (it did with 2.6.8)
reassign 321403 linux-2.6 thanks this seems to be a known upstream bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773 unfortunately i don't see a resolution yet. could you test latest -rc6 from linus and followup there, if you still see the bug. if not we would be happy to know too. thanks for your feedback. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304993: marked as done (when compiling kernel-source 2.6.11 - stdarg.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:51:52 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line when compiling kernel-source 2.6.11 - stdarg.h: No such file or directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 04:30:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 21:30:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gizmo02bw.bigpond.com [144.140.70.12] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DN1Qg-0008Af-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:30:42 -0700 Received: (qmail 19813 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2005 04:30:09 - Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam13.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.106) by gizmo02bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2005 04:30:09 - Received: from glpp-p-144-134-105-13.prem.tmns.net.au ([144.134.105.13]) by bwmam13.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 192/3686) with SMTP id 3686; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:30:09 +1000 From: Arthur Gruzauskas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: when compiling kernel-source 2.6.11 - stdarg.h: No such file or directory Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:31:53 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source Version: 2.6.11-1 On compiling kernel-source-2.6.11-1 with or without kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11-3, using current make-kpkg, as i have since kernel 2.4 days, i get the following error. arch/i386/kernel/process.c:14:20: stdarg.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.11' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 kernel-source 2.6.10-x still builds fine. a bit of intermittent trawling (2 weeks worth...) found the following fix which worked for me. export GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/ Is it a kernel or gcc problem (or me) ? Clearly it is a bit of a kludge as it will change with gcc versions. This is my first bug report, i hope it is clear enough. i am happy to supply more info if needed. I tried looking to see if it was a duplicate bug, but i dont think it is, although the process was a bit opaque to me. Thank you for being debian. Arthur Gruzauskas --- Received: (at 304993-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 08:52:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 01:52:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3VHD-0002YW-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:52:31 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1DA65C00B; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:51:52 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: when compiling kernel-source 2.6.11 - stdarg.h: No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 no follow-up, i guess your fixed your setup inbetween. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.11: Reset to TCP connections
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 305537 moreinfo Bug#305537: kernel-source-2.6.11: Reset to TCP connections There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 317079 ftp.debian.org Bug#317079: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4 Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.11' to `ftp.debian.org'. clone 317079 -1 Bug#317079: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4 Bug 317079 cloned as bug 322697. retitle -1 linux kernel 2.6.10 no longer supported by d-kernel team Bug#322697: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4 Changed Bug title. retitle 317079 linux kernel 2.6.11 no longer supported by d-kernel team Bug#317079: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307327 moreinfo Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks Tags were: patch Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
tags 307327 moreinfo thanks what't the state of that in linux image 2.6.12? any progress.. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305537: kernel-source-2.6.11: Reset to TCP connections
tags 305537 moreinfo thanks can you reproduce it with linux image 2.6.12? are you using iptables? what's your lsmod output? have you ip_nat_ftp loaded? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317079: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel fails to build with gcc 4
reassign 317079 ftp.debian.org
clone 317079 -1
retitle -1 linux kernel 2.6.10 no longer supported by d-kernel team
retitle 317079 linux kernel 2.6.11 no longer supported by d-kernel team
thanks
could you please remove the kernel-source-2.6.{10,11}
and the subsequent kernel-images.
2.6.10 has not been maintained since the first 2.6.11 release and
this was dropped against current 2.6.12.
they both contain open security bugs and ftbfs on gcc-4.
please say if you need a bug for the different kernel images.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322533: linux-2.6: no sound: codec_write 0: semaphore is not ready for register
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: tags 322533 + fixed-upstream thanks On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:14, Steve Langasek wrote: codec_write 0: semaphore is not ready for register 0x2 Under 2.6.8, the following modules are loaded: snd_intel8x0m 20872 0 snd_intel8x0 37452 2 I've seen the same problem on my laptop and managed to trace it to a conflict between snd_intel8x0 (that drives audio) and snd_intel8x0m (that drives the modem). If you unload the snd_intel8x0m module (or blacklist it so it does not get loaded in the first place), the messages will go away. Great, this workaround does the trick for me, thanks. :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#280091: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.9: build fails at early stage on Alpha)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:10:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kernel-source-2.6.9: build fails at early stage on Alpha has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2004 06:12:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 06 22:12:11 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep18.inet.fi [194.251.242.243] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CQgHb-0007Je-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:12:11 -0800 Received: from zazu.vip.fi ([80.223.232.180]) by fep18.inet.fi with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 08:12:05 +0200 Received: from mufasa.vip.fi ([192.168.1.4]) by zazu.vip.fi with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQgHU-CH-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:12:04 +0200 Received: from pahartik by mufasa.vip.fi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQgHR-0001rk-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:12:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paavo Hartikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.9: build fails at early stage on Alpha X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:12:00 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.9 Severity: important Results of fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=mufasa.1 kernel_image: --- [...] CC arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:4, from include/linux/thread_info.h:20, from include/linux/spinlock.h:12, from include/linux/capability.h:45, from include/linux/sched.h:7, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/asm/bitops.h: In function `find_next_zero_bit': include/asm/bitops.h:387: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type include/asm/bitops.h: In function `ext2_find_next_zero_bit': include/asm/bitops.h:446: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:13, from include/linux/capability.h:45, from include/linux/sched.h:7, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/linux/kernel.h: At top level: include/linux/kernel.h:83: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `snprintf' include/linux/kernel.h:84: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `vsnprintf' In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8, from include/linux/cpumask.h:78, from include/linux/sched.h:15, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/linux/string.h:18: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strspn' include/linux/string.h:19: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strcspn' In file included from include/linux/string.h:24, from include/linux/bitmap.h:8, from include/linux/cpumask.h:78, from include/linux/sched.h:15, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/asm/string.h:21: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strncpy' include/asm/string.h:22: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strlen' include/asm/string.h:25: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memset' include/asm/string.h:26: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcpy' include/asm/string.h:28: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcmp' In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8, from include/linux/cpumask.h:78, from include/linux/sched.h:15, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/linux/string.h:39: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strncat' include/linux/string.h:48: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strncmp' In file included from include/linux/sched.h:692, from arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9: include/asm/current.h:8: error: invalid register name for `current' In file included from
Bug#290964: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free
can you still reproduce this bug with newer linux kernel images, like the linux image 2.6.12? didn't see anymore of these bug reports. assuming it got fixed. thanks for your feedback. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317829: kernel-source-2.6.8: Loading of vesafb fail at the boot time
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:47:22PM +0200, Carl Castanier wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'), (33, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-woodswolf Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) I try to load vesafb at the boot time by append=video=vesafb and no /dev/fd0 device is created. I try to compile vesafb in the kernel inside and as the module ; it's don't work. The same problem exist why the 2.6.11 version Jul 11 21:39:22 wolf001 kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.11-woodswolf Jul 11 21:39:22 wolf001 kernel: Loaded 26625 symbols from /boot/System.map-2.6.11-woodswolf. Jul 11 21:39:22 wolf001 kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.6.11. Jul 11 21:39:22 wolf001 kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled. So I don't know why, but vesafb can't be load at the boot time. When I look for why, I test different vga mode. The scan get me 7 modes and only 2 works. For the others 5, I have a blank screen until the X server come. Is is possible for you to test a more recent kernel, say 2.6.13-rc6. I looked in upstream's git and there have been a few changes that might be relevant there. Also, could you send the output of lspci -v and the output of dmsg from failures under various kernels. Thanks -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282741: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 06:11:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 23 22:11:06 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hasso.estpak.ee [194.126.115.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CWqMr-0007nd-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:11:05 -0800 Received: from hasso by hasso.estpak.ee with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CWqMn-0005Mi-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:11:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hasso Tepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:11:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Hasso Tepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.9 Version: 2.6.9-2 Severity: normal Interfaces don't get IPv6 link-local addresses if IPv6 is compiled as module and module is loaded after network interface driver module. For more info and patch see http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00558.html -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=et_EE.iso8859-15, LC_CTYPE=et_EE.iso8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.9 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-4 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-1A high-quality block-sorting file ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 282741-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 09:25:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 02:25:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3Vmj-0003YE-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:25:05 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 811F15C00F; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 ipv6 is no longer experimental in 2.6.12. pretty sure your mentioned bug got fixed in between. please reopen if pain subsists. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291333: marked as done (clock time incorrect after suspend/resume [PATCH])
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:22:00 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line clock time incorrect after suspend/resume [PATCH] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 04:24:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 20:24:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smta05.mail.ozemail.net [203.103.165.90] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CrTs0-0002qZ-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:24:33 -0800 Received: from pug.anu.edu.au ([150.203.181.71]) by smta05.mail.ozemail.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 04:24:31 + Received: from drew by pug.anu.edu.au with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CrTry-0001cb-IK; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:24:30 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: clock time incorrect after suspend/resume [PATCH] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:24:30 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch The 2.6.10 kernel introduced a problem with the system clock after a suspend/resume cycle. Although the hardware clock retains the correct time, the system clock goes fast by many hours after resuming. Obviously, this screws up convenient use of the file system. The kernel developers have identified the problem in the wall-clock jiffies, and a patch is available. I believe it has already been fixed in 2.6.11-rc1. The patch is: diff -ruNp 910-original-time-patch-old/arch/i386/kernel/time.c 910-original-time-patch-new/arch/i386/kernel/time.c --- 910-original-time-patch-old/arch/i386/kernel/time.c 2004-12-27 +++ 910-original-time-patch-new/arch/i386/kernel/time.c 2005-01-08 @@ -343,12 +343,13 @@ static int timer_resume(struct sys_devic hpet_reenable(); #endif sec = get_cmos_time() + clock_cmos_diff; - sleep_length = get_cmos_time() - sleep_start; + sleep_length = (get_cmos_time() - sleep_start) * HZ; write_seqlock_irqsave(xtime_lock, flags); xtime.tv_sec = sec; xtime.tv_nsec = 0; write_sequnlock_irqrestore(xtime_lock, flags); - jiffies += sleep_length * HZ; + jiffies += sleep_length; + wall_jiffies += sleep_length; return 0; } (taken from the linux-kernel mailing list at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110557084814587w=2) Drew -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-3high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 291333-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 09:22:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 02:22:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3VkM-0003Bc-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:22:38 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DA76D5C00F; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:22:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:22:00 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: clock time incorrect after suspend/resume [PATCH] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 307327 linux-2.6 Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.11' to `linux-2.6'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298835: marked as done ([PATCH] National language support for ASFS filesystem)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:31:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [PATCH] National language support for ASFS filesystem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 09:37:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 01:37:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.31] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9K6q-0001nN-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:37:36 -0800 Received: from mailc.rambler.ru (mailc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.27]) by mxc.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E7ACDB29 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:37:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost.localdomain (mailgw.cps.ru [62.117.96.149]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailc.rambler.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2A9bYYl007366 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:37:34 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:40:19 -0500 From: Pavel Fedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] National language support for ASFS filesystem Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Multipart=_Thu__10_Mar_2005_12_40_19_-0500_adb.6abS6w6nUz1q X-Auth-User: sonic_amiga, whoson: (null) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Multipart=_Thu__10_Mar_2005_12_40_19_-0500_adb.6abS6w6nUz1q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: kernel-source-2.6.11 Version: 2.6.11-1 Tags: patch This patch adds national language support to asfs filesystem for Linux kernel. It introduces iocharset and codepage arguments. Apply it to a kernel with ASFS already applied. Tested on 2.6.11.1 (with asfs 1.0b8 applied) and 2.6.8-10 (from Debian package) kernels. -- Best regards, Pavel Fedin, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Multipart=_Thu__10_Mar_2005_12_40_19_-0500_adb.6abS6w6nUz1q Content-Type: text/plain; name=asfs-nls.diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=asfs-nls.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIGxpbnV4LTIuNi4xMS4xL2ZzL2FzZnMvYXNmc19mcy5oLm9yaWcJMjAwNS0wMy0wOSAxMToy NTozNC4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA1MDANCisrKyBsaW51eC0yLjYuMTEuMS9mcy9hc2ZzL2FzZnNfZnMu aAkyMDA1LTAzLTA5IDExOjI1OjU2LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDUwMA0KQEAgLTY2LDYgKzY2LDEwIEBA DQogCXUxNiBmbGFnczsNCiAJY2hhciAqcHJlZml4Ow0KIAljaGFyICpyb290X3ZvbHVtZTsJCS8q IFZvbHVtZSBwcmVmaXggZm9yIGFic29sdXRlIHN5bWxpbmtzLiAqLw0KKwljaGFyICppb2NoYXJz ZXQ7DQorCWludCBjb2RlcGFnZTsNCisJc3RydWN0IG5sc190YWJsZSAqbmxzX2lvOw0KKwlzdHJ1 Y3QgbmxzX3RhYmxlICpubHNfZGlzazsNCiB9Ow0KIA0KIC8qIHNob3J0IGN1dCB0byBnZXQgdG8g dGhlIGFzZnMgc3BlY2lmaWMgc2IgZGF0YSAqLw0KQEAgLTE4MCw4ICsxODQsOSBAQA0KIA0KIC8q IG5hbWVpICovDQogdTggYXNmc19sb3dlcmNoYXIodTggYyk7DQotaW50IGFzZnNfbmFtZWNtcCh1 OCAqcywgdTggKmN0LCBpbnQgY2FzZXNlbnNpdGl2ZSk7DQoraW50IGFzZnNfbmFtZWNtcCh1OCAq cywgdTggKmN0LCBpbnQgY2FzZXNlbnNpdGl2ZSwgc3RydWN0IG5sc190YWJsZSAqdCk7DQogdTE2 IGFzZnNfaGFzaCh1OCAqbmFtZSwgaW50IGNhc2VzZW5zaXRpdmUpOw0KK3ZvaWQgYXNmc190cmFu c2xhdGUodTggKnRvLCB1OCAqZnJvbSwgc3RydWN0IG5sc190YWJsZSAqbmxzX3RvLCBzdHJ1Y3Qg bmxzX3RhYmxlICpubHNfZnJvbSk7DQogDQogLyogbm9kZXMgKi8NCiBpbnQgYXNmc19nZXRub2Rl KHN0cnVjdCBzdXBlcl9ibG9jayAqc2IsIHUzMiBub2Rlbm8sDQotLS0gbGludXgtMi42LjExLjEv ZnMvYXNmcy9kaXIuYy5vcmlnCTIwMDUtMDMtMDkgMTE6MjU6MzQuMDAwMDAwMDAwIC0wNTAwDQor KysgbGludXgtMi42LjExLjEvZnMvYXNmcy9kaXIuYwkyMDA1LTAzLTA5IDEyOjUzOjA2LjAwMDAw MDAwMCAtMDUwMA0KQEAgLTI5LDYgKzI5LDkgQEANCiB7DQogCXN0cnVjdCBpbm9kZSAqZGlyID0g ZmlscC0+Zl9kZW50cnktPmRfaW5vZGU7DQogCXN0cnVjdCBzdXBlcl9ibG9jayAqc2IgPSBkaXIt Pmlfc2I7DQorCXN0cnVjdCBubHNfdGFibGUgKm5sc19pbyA9IEFTRlNfU0Ioc2IpLT5ubHNfaW87 DQorCXN0cnVjdCBubHNfdGFibGUgKm5sc19kaXNrID0gQVNGU19TQihzYiktPm5sc19kaXNrOw0K Kwl1OCBidWZbNTEyXTsNCiAJdW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZyBmX3BvczsNCiAJaW50IHN0b3JlZCA9IDA7 DQogDQpAQCAtOTMsOCArOTYsOSBAQA0KIA0KIAkJCWlmIChhZGQgJiYgIShvYmotPmJpdHMgJiBP VFlQRV9ISURERU4pKSB7DQogCQkJCXVuc2lnbmVkIGludCB0eXBlOw0KKwkJCQlhc2ZzX3RyYW5z bGF0ZShidWYsIG9iai0+bmFtZSwgbmxzX2lvLCBubHNfZGlzayk7DQogCQkJCWFzZnNfZGVidWco
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
reassign 307327 linux-2.6 stop On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: what't the state of that in linux image 2.6.12? any progress.. Upstream 2.6.12 still needs the patch from http://localhost/~voss/comp/powerbook/index.html#fnkey-patch As I compile my own kernels, I did not check whether the debian package contains a fix. ok thanks for quick feedback, reassign to latest package in unstable. but acpi generic hotkey support will still need some more release cycles in order to get working. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: reassign 307327 linux-2.6 stop On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: what't the state of that in linux image 2.6.12? any progress.. Upstream 2.6.12 still needs the patch from http://localhost/~voss/comp/powerbook/index.html#fnkey-patch As I compile my own kernels, I did not check whether the debian package contains a fix. ok thanks for quick feedback, reassign to latest package in unstable. but acpi generic hotkey support will still need some more release cycles in order to get working. Jochen, whats the correct hostname for that URL? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297832: [powerpc] iBook2 will not wake from sleep
any update on the matter? have you tried linux image 2.6.12? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
Hello Horms, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:56:42PM +0900, Horms wrote: whats the correct hostname for that URL? Sorry, the link should have been http://seehuhn.de/comp/powerbook/index.html#fnkey-patch I hope this helps, Jochen -- http://seehuhn.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#270376: Status Update?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:58:42PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote: I was just wondering what the status of this bug is? Do the current kernels in Sid fix this? I am not sure, but testing is always welcome. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: Upstream 2.6.12 still needs the patch from http://localhost/~voss/comp/powerbook/index.html#fnkey-patch localhost? As I compile my own kernels, I did not check whether the debian package contains a fix. What is the upstream status of this patch? Bastian -- I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer to any question. -- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:01:20AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: Hello Horms, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:56:42PM +0900, Horms wrote: whats the correct hostname for that URL? Sorry, the link should have been http://seehuhn.de/comp/powerbook/index.html#fnkey-patch That seems fine enough to me, has is been submitted upstream? Thats really the prefered path for features getting into Debian's kernel. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296721: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.10: a third instance of unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = integer)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 10:08:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 02:08:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-out-02.utu.fi [130.232.202.172] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4Fuq-0003WJ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:08:17 -0800 Received: from alnitak.stiff.utu.fi (mintaka-dsl.utu.fi [130.232.36.179]) by smtp02.mess.utu.fi (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:06:12 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:06:12 +0200 From: Juha =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=E4ykk=E4?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.10: a third instance of unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = integer To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: University of Turku MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-5 Severity: important I am experiencing the same symptoms as bugs #291029, #290964 and #291940. This time the device is just an ordinary eth0 (happens to be a prism54) - no tunnels, bridges or anything. I even removed all IPv6- and tunneling support from the kernel (that's why my kernel is not Debian's own kernel-image - the .config is identical except swsusp is turned on and the forementioned parts off). This happens almost every time there is a network connection established when I try to ifdown the interface or remove the pccard or unload the module. I say almost: it looks like only ssh connections and actively refreshed http-connections actually make this happen. Perhaps those queues' Recv-Q or Send'Q are non-empty? (A connection established means here that netstat says it's established.) The problem sometimes goes away by terminating the offending process - if I can find which one it is. This does not happen every time, though. Shutting down works fine, since the processes are terminated before ifdown is run. The problem is that using ACPI sleep states (swsusp, S3, hibernate etc) take ethernet devices down first and hang there - with the line in subject. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (999, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10+juhaj+v1.7 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 296721-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:30:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:30:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3Wnx-0003Il-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:30:25 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C3ADF5C001; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#285696: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.9: smbfs problem in 2.6.9-3: cannot write to files
any update on the matter? can you reproduce the bug with newer kernel version? don't see newer bug reports so it may be fixed inbetween. thanks for your feedback -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290964: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: ifdown freezes: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 23:06:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 17 15:06:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mandy.eunet.fi [193.66.1.129] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cqfxb-0007Co-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:06:59 -0800 Received: from js-1.kpnqwest.fi (js-1.kpnqwest.fi [193.64.243.217]) by mandy.eunet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CC713DDA0; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:06:37 +0200 (EET) Received: from js by js-1.kpnqwest.fi with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CqfxF-yb-3D; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:06:37 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jukka Suomela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: ifdown freezes: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:06:37 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: normal With the 2.6.10-1-686 kernel, ifdown -a freezes. After a while kernel starts logging messages such as: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tunnel0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (Above tunnel0 is an IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling device.) The same setup works fine with the current 2.6.8-2-686 kernel package, and it has worked with earlier kernels, too. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.76 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.1-rel-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo --- Received: (at 290964-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:30:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:30:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3Wnx-0003Il-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:30:25 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C3ADF5C001; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0300, Jukka Suomela wrote: On Friday 12 August 2005 12:19, Maximilian Attems wrote: can you still reproduce this bug with newer linux kernel images, like the linux image 2.6.12? If I remember right, I never saw this problem with 2.6.11 kernel images from Debian unstable. It just happened on 2.6.10. I am sorry I do not have the same network setup any more, so I cannot tell what would have happened with 2.6.12. Anyway, 2.6.12 works fine on my current system. Best regards, Jukka Suomela thanks to all your feedback. indeed the sent patch went in before 2.6.12. closing therefor. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Bug#291940: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.10: IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnel hangs at shutdown, Waiting for dev to become free)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2005 03:33:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 19:33:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl081-048-014.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net (ns1.hamachi.us) [64.81.48.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CsuyU-00026J-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:33:10 -0800 Received: by ns1.hamachi.us (Postfix, from userid 2513) id 374D23812B; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:33:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steven Ihde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.10: IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnel hangs at shutdown, Waiting for dev to become free X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:33:09 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: important My IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnel causes 2.6.10 to hang on shutdown (every time). The tunnel is named henet0; the message printed over and over is: unregister_netdevice: waiting for henet0 to become free. Usage count = 1 I verified that the hang also happens with 2.6.10 vanilla (i.e., Debian patches removed). It worked fine with 2.6.8 (Debian). Apparently there were issues with unregister_netdevice that were solved previously, but this appears to be a new bug with 2.6.10. This has been discussed recently on the linux-netdev mailing list; here are some links: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110585721626841w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110476395824647w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110405248721053w=2 This appears similar to Debian bug 291029 but I'm filing it as a separate bug, because 291029 involves a bridge device whereas this involves a 6-in-4 tunnel device. From perusing the discussion on linux-netdev it sounds like they may be separate issues. This message on linux-netdev had a patch; it wasn't clear whether it was supposed to fix this problem, but I tried it anyway and it did not: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110451354301328w=2 For now, I'm hanging back at 2.6.8 because I don't like the idea that I can't reboot the box remotely. Thanks, Steve -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (890, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-hamachi Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-2high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 290964-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:30:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:30:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3Wnx-0003Il-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:30:25 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C3ADF5C001; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
Bug#318121: compile module for initio.ko SCSI driver now un-BROKEN
Alle 12:05, venerdì 12 agosto 2005, Horms ha scritto: reassign 318121 kernel-source-2.6.8 tag 318121 +wontfix thanks That option probably should have been enabled for Sarge's 2.6.8, but unforunately it wasn't. Rather than turn it on and try and get it into a Sarge update for 2.6.8, I'd like to encourage people to try the 2.6.12 kernels that are currently in unstable fine by me. for my scsi tape i'm currently using (not much anyhow) a module self compiled for 2.6.8 and i didn't encounter problems up to now. i'll probably upgrade to 2.6.12 on september. I'm reassigning this back to kernel-source-2.6.8 and tagging it as wontfix to act as a record for others. thanks -- B-Open Solutions srl - http://www.bopen.it/ Sicurezza informatica e software Open Source su: -- http://www.bopen.it/newsletter/200501/ --
Bug#297832: [powerpc] iBook2 will not wake from sleep
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:34:06AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: any update on the matter? have you tried linux image 2.6.12? Note that I had the same problem when I still had my iBook2.2. The problem only occurs if X runs or did run. When I booted with X disabled it worked just fine, so it looks more like an X problem to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
hello jochen, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:55:53AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: but acpi generic hotkey support will still need some more release cycles in order to get working. What is acpi generic hotkey support? Note that Apple PowerBooks don't use ACPI and that the fn key is not a hotkey but just another modifier key. Because the keyboard has not enough keys, you need fn to access, for example, the page-up and page-down keys. urrgs sorry for my sloppy read. associated those funky latop keys with acpi semi-automatically. indeed the generic hotkey support is intended as better acpi support for laptops. there is a nice paper on it in the ols proceedings volume 1 p.51 - http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2005/ wont help you for sure. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317386: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
any update on the matter? had you another crash? is your hadware stable, any particular problems? i must confess to have seen a similar crash on one of our university machines. it was running 2.4.25 and this bug happened once. machine shouldn't have been under mem pressure, but had a quite long uptime. i guess it's a feature of the 2.4 vm. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#270199: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance
any update on the matter? did the 2.4.27 fix the dma problem? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.12 in volatile?
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:56:00AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: The latter, according to volatile policy (... must be autobuildable from the same release...). Is that part of the policy intended preclude providing an update to kernel-package (or any other tool) that might be needed? It would be good to clarify that. Technically, we consider sarge+sarge/security+sarge/volatile as the release we build volatile packages in. However, as build-depending on a newer version is _also_ a packaging change, there needs to be a really good reason for that (as for any packaging change). Another solution I thought of would be to bundle kernel-package inside linux-2.6 (for volatile/sarge) somewhere. Though I am not sure how much surgery would be required to relocate kernel-package. Well, that's obviously worse. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259879: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: Problems loading module 8139cp)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:55:22 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: Problems loading module 8139cp has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 04:38:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 21:38:57 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlgyP-0007Wl-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:38:57 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (12-221-57-64.client.insightbb.com[12.221.57.64]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP id 20040717043826i9200q1aoee; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 04:38:26 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brad Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: Problems loading module 8139cp Bcc: Brad Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:38:25 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7 Version: 2.4.26-3 Severity: important Error is as follows: /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-k7/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o: init_module: No such device Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-k7/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-k7/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o failed /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-k7/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o: insmod 8139cp failed Now the odd thing is, I use the 8139too module, but I get this error... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-1The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-1The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.71 tools to create initrd image for p ii modutils 2.4.26-1 Linux module utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 259879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 13:55:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 06:55:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3a0R-0001mv-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:55:32 -0700 Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 86A5B5C001; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:55:22 +0200 From: Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7: Problems loading module 8139cp Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-k7/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o: init_module: No such device .. Now the odd thing is, I use the 8139too module, but I get this error... you can't load both at the same time. anyway happy that one of the two seems working. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - patches
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:31:33AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: bin/amd64-linux-* Right, but these files are no longer there for 2.6.12. So they are not required anymore, it seems? As far as I can tell, in 2.6.12 amd64 images build happily with default flags... Or is it some new flavour (pure 64-bit?) which is planned? Current system is definitely not flexible enough. I have remote plans to allow setting of various build options (most importantly, options to make-kpkg calls) on per-flavour basis, allowing to control them from Makefile.inc. Is it something like this you have in mind? All I want to do is avoid needless duplication of effort. It is currently included. However as it is only created during the kernel image build, You have not read the makefiles. It is built in the prepare target for any expect the two names architectures. we have to check after building every flavour and copy it in place, if necessary. This is done in build-stamp-$(subarch)-% target in debian/Makefile. What do you have in mind? I'll remove that hack in the near future as it will not longer work in -4. I'm trying to figure out what is the alternative... Currently asm-offsets.s files are included in the common arch/subarch linux-headers package. The problem is that we are building this package (using make-kpkg) in a directory, where the full kernel build was never performed. make-kpkg does not, to the best of my knowledge, generate this file while building the linux-headers package. Do you plan to run the 'prepare' target in this directory before that? Then it might be a problem with getting make-kpkg to actually include this file in the package. Any other options? Bastian Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: downgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 317386 important Bug#317386: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 309964 linux-2.6 Bug#309964: drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01) and linux hangs Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp' to `linux-2.6'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285017: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem
any update on the matter? did the mentioned upload solve your problem? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322729: i82365 driver trouble?
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 Version: 2.6.12-2 Hi, I just installed linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 on a test system, and I get these messages during boot: Linux Kernel Card Services options: [pci] [cardbus] [apm] Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found Device 'i82365.0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. Badness in device_release at drivers/base/core.c:83 [c0195185] kobject_cleanup+0x3f/0x64 [c01951aa] kobject_release+0x0/0xa [c01958f0] kref_put+0x48/0x54 [c01951ca] kobject_put+0x16/0x19 [c01951aa] kobject_release+0x0/0xa [d0966d4f] init_i82365+0x6f/0x164 [i82365] [c0127f3f] sys_init_module+0xb8/0x176 [c0102e9d] syscall_call+0x7/0xb * Using yenta_socket instead of i82365 cardmgr[3051]: no sockets found! failed! Loading the saved-state of the serial devices... So far the system still seems to be running stably, but I thought you would want to know about this. I'll attach the output of lspci -vvv; let me know if you need anything else. Thanks -- graham:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5597 [SiS5582] (rev 10) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR- Latency: 255 :00:01.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) (rev 01) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 0 :00:01.1 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 64 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 14 Region 0: I/O ports at ignored Region 1: I/O ports at ignored Region 2: I/O ports at ignored Region 3: I/O ports at ignored Region 4: I/O ports at 4000 [size=16] :00:01.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 10) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 0x08 (32 bytes) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 Region 0: Memory at e200 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] :00:09.0 VGA compatible controller: Chips and Technologies F6 HiQVPro (rev c6) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Chips and Technologies F6 HiQVPro Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Region 0: Memory at e000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] :00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RT8139 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (8000ns min, 16000ns max) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 15 Region 0: I/O ports at e000 [size=256] Region 1: Memory at e2001000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0-,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Bug#322734: linux-image-2.6.12-1-sparc64: oops while loading sungem(?) on sun blade 100
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-sparc64 Version: 2.6.12-2 The kernel oopses, says it can't load sungem, then announces that eth0 is up at 100/full. kernel-image-2.6.11-1-sparc64 2.6.11-5 works fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#270199: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance
Maximilian Attems wrote: any update on the matter? did the 2.4.27 fix the dma problem? -- maks The system concerned died an horrible death and was replaced with a system running WBEL (because WBEL was the only realistic installation choice as all my network installs were done from the deceased server). Consequently, I no longer have the hardware on which the problem occurred, and I've not seen the problem on anything else. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272768: USB device detection broken in latest kernels version 2.4.26 and 2.4.27
did you try an 2.6 kernel? did it work better? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#277358: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k7: cannot mount SCSI LVM at boot
any update on the matter? did it get solved due to initrd-tools, lvm2 or kernel upgrades? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
Hello, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:09:55PM +0900, Horms wrote: [the fn key patch] seems fine enough to me, has is been submitted upstream? I don't know. In http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/07/msg00370.html Stelian Pop (CCed) asked whether he should push this into the mainstream kernel, but I do not know the final outcome of this. Stelian: what is the current state of this? I hope this helps, Jochen -- http://seehuhn.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: linux-2.6 - patches
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:47:07AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:31:33AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: bin/amd64-linux-* Right, but these files are no longer there for 2.6.12. So they are not required anymore, it seems? As far as I can tell, in 2.6.12 amd64 images build happily with default flags... Or is it some new flavour (pure 64-bit?) which is planned? No, 2.6.12 don't build x86_64 images for i386. we have to check after building every flavour and copy it in place, if necessary. This is done in build-stamp-$(subarch)-% target in debian/Makefile. What do you have in mind? I'll remove that hack in the near future as it will not longer work in -4. I'm trying to figure out what is the alternative... Currently asm-offsets.s files are included in the common arch/subarch linux-headers package. The problem is that we are building this package (using make-kpkg) in a directory, where the full kernel build was never performed. make-kpkg does not, to the best of my knowledge, generate this file while building the linux-headers package. Do you plan to run the 'prepare' target in this directory before that? Then it might be a problem with getting make-kpkg to actually include this file in the package. Any other options? | You have not read the makefiles. It is built in the prepare target for | any expect the two names architectures. The make-kpkg configure call explicitely calls make prepare in the kernel source. Bastian -- Bones: The man's DEAD, Jim! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#270199: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:01:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2004 04:35:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 05 21:35:17 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.132]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C4BDp-0007xM-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 21:35:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CA311A538
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:34:46 +0800 (WST)
Received: from ns.computerdatasafe.com.au (dip-220-235-33-77.wa.westnet.com.au
[220.235.33.77])
by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC5F11A570
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:34:44 +0800 (WST)
Received: by ns.computerdatasafe.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 96E4453B5D; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:33:13 +0800 (WST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686: Poor ATA I/O performance
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:33:13 +0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
Version: 2.4.26-2
Severity: important
I've just filed a bug report against 2.6 for this same system; 2.6 does
not work on this system, so I have no workaround.
Here is my fully-tuned disk I/O performance:
ns:~# hdparm -t /dev/hda{,}
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.32 seconds = 5.42 MB/sec
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.31 seconds = 5.44 MB/sec
ns:~#
Expected performance on this hardware is 25-30 Mbytes/sec.
The drive:
ns:~# hdparm -i /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Model=ST3120022A, FwRev=8.54, SerialNo=3JS3RFNQ
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs RotSpdTol.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=234441648
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2:
* signifies the current active mode
ns:~#
Note that DMA is not turned on, and I cannot turn it on.
Tuning:
ns:~# hdparm -d1 -c1 -k1 -K1 /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
setting 32-bit IO_support flag to 1
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
setting keep_settings to 1 (on)
setting drive keep features to 1 (on)
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(keepsettings) failed: Input/output error
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
using_dma= 0 (off)
keepsettings = 1 (on)
ns:~#
PCI:
ns:~# lspci -n
:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 03)
:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 03)
:00:0d.0 0100: 1000:000f (rev 26)
:00:0f.0 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 05)
:00:12.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
:00:12.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
:00:12.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
:00:12.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
:00:14.0 0300: 1013:00bc (rev 23)
ns:~#
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge
(rev 03)
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
Latency: 64
Region 0: Memory at f800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
Capabilities: [a0] AGP version 1.0
Status: RQ=32 Iso- ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64- HTrans-
64bit- FW- AGP3- Rate=x1,x2
Command: RQ=1 ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA- AGP- GART64- 64bit- FW-
Rate=none
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge
(rev 03) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle+ MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr-
Bug#277358: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k7: cannot mount SCSI LVM at boot
Il giorno ven, 12/08/2005 alle 16.03 +0200, Maximilian Attems ha scritto: any update on the matter? did it get solved due to initrd-tools, lvm2 or kernel upgrades? Sadly I cannot answer since that machine was rebuild recently and switched to a different LVM/MD configuration. Is there anyone that may reproduce it? Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322755: initrd-tools: initrd image should not depend on physical devices' names alteration
Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.81.1 Severity: important Greetings, Currently if root filesystem is an MD device (raid1 in my case), mkinitrd creates initrd image which has hardcoded names of physical devices on which raid is built on. To be more concrete, it creates a file in initrd cramfs called /script contains commands like: -- /script -- ROOT=/dev/md0 mdadm -A /dev/md0 -R -u MD device uuid /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 end This works great until you add/remove any other SCSI or SATA disks, device names changed and once you reboot your machine you'll get degraded or even inaccessible array (system becomes unbootable). Possible solution is to create script like /sbin/mdrun which will automatically detect partitions raid built on and use them instead of hardcoded when mkinitrd runs names. Best regards, Dmitry N. Hramtsov -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii cpio 2.5-1.2GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii cramfsprogs 1.1-6 Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F ii dash 0.5.2-5The Debian Almquist Shell ii util-linux2.12p-4Miscellaneous system utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322004: kernel-source-2.6.8: Fails to compile on a X86_64 platform
Horms wrote: tag 322004 +sid tag 322004 +wontfix thanks On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:19:12PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote: [snip] arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already defined arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already defined make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o] Error 1 That is very odd. You have gcc 3.3 which I believe should work. Could you try this with one the configuration supplied with one of the amd64 kernel images? Yes, I've just tried it with config-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8. The same problem. On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:13:30PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote: Tried again with gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 with the same results. Hi, I spoke to Frederik Schueler about this problem, and he told me that it was a toolchain problem in sid. We are actually planning to remove kernel-source-2.6.8 from sid in the near future. So could you please either use linux-source-2.6.12 from sid, or compile on sarge. In any case, its pretty difficult to fix this problem in sid (or so I have been told), and the problem should not manifest in sarge, so I am going to tag it sid and wontfix. Hopefully others with the same problem will see this. Thanks All right. Thanks for your time and job. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307327: kernel-source-2.6.11: [powerpc] fn-key does not work on new powerbooks
Le vendredi 12 août 2005 à 15:03 +0100, Jochen Voss a écrit : Hello, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:09:55PM +0900, Horms wrote: [the fn key patch] seems fine enough to me, has is been submitted upstream? I don't know. In http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/07/msg00370.html Stelian Pop (CCed) asked whether he should push this into the mainstream kernel, but I do not know the final outcome of this. Stelian: what is the current state of this? The current state is that the patch has been discussed on lkml and in private with Vojtech Pavlik, the kernel input subsystem maintainter. He didn't agree to the patch, considering that the right control key assignment is a hack and the key should send the function key keycode instead. A patch implementing this behaviour is already in the -mm kernel and it is reasonable to think that it will be in 2.6.14. The Fn key can be easily assigned to any X modifier (including right control) using the standard xkb mappings. The only (big) downside is that the FN keycode will not be understood by the classic X keyboard driver (no events in xev for example), unless the new (and not upstream yet) input based X keyboard driver is used. I know Gentoo patched X in order to add this augmented driver, and that X.org will include the driver in a future release. But until then, this will require a patched X server. Stelian. -- Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285017: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:05:13 +0200 Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any update on the matter? did the mentioned upload solve your problem? Sorry I can't tell you -- treachery most foul! -- I upgraded to kernel v2.6.x a while back, and don't currently have any v2.4.27 setup to test the update with. :-( As far as modems go the v2.6.x series is working OK... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80878: what we missed..
For your immediate review: Good Day, your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for you to consider. Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit situation is not of concern. Confirm your details on our secure form to ensure the data we have is up to date, thank you. http://www.passivexs.com/index2.php?refid=windsor --Tony Swift Lead Financial Advisor - eLMR Corp. opt out of our list here: http://www.passivexs.com/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322612: genksyms script missing
retitle 322612 Various scripts/binaries missing from scripts directory severity 322612 important thanks Thanks for your report. Indeed, due to a recent change some parts of the scripts directory (at least, gcc-version.sh in addition to genksyms) are missing. The solution for it is in the works. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: genksyms script missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 322612 Various scripts/binaries missing from scripts directory Bug#322612: genksyms script missing Changed Bug title. severity 322612 important Bug#322612: Various scripts/binaries missing from scripts directory Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322610: include/asm-ppc/setup.h includes mk68k header files which aren't in the package
tags 322610 patch
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for the report. I'd appreciate if you would test the attached patch
(against linux-2.6 2.6.12-2 source package) and see if it fixes the
situation. If it does, I'll push it into the svn.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CCdiff -aur a/debian/Makefile b/debian/Makefile
--- a/debian/Makefile 2005-08-11 22:02:40.0 -0400
+++ b/debian/Makefile 2005-08-11 22:52:03.0 -0400
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@
sed -e 's,@initrd_modules@,$(initrd_modules),' \
-e 's,@append_subarch@,$(append),' \
-e 's,@extra_postinstall_command@,$(extra_command),'\
+ -e 's,@headers_dirs@,$(headers_dirs),' \
templates/post-install.in post-install-$(subarch)
#
# Generates the kernel config file for a subarch by merging
diff -aur a/debian/arch/powerpc/Makefile.inc b/debian/arch/powerpc/Makefile.inc
--- a/debian/arch/powerpc/Makefile.inc 2005-08-11 22:02:40.0 -0400
+++ b/debian/arch/powerpc/Makefile.inc 2005-08-11 22:05:09.0 -0400
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#
# Variables
#
-headers_dirs = ppc | ppc64
+headers_dirs = ppc | ppc64 | m68k
headers_subarch = powerpc
build_subarch = powerpc
diff -aur a/debian/templates/post-install.in b/debian/templates/post-install.in
--- a/debian/templates/post-install.in 2005-08-11 22:02:40.0 -0400
+++ b/debian/templates/post-install.in 2005-08-12 02:14:37.0 -0400
@@ -78,6 +78,21 @@
xargs ln -s --target-directory=$dir/include
cp -a config $dir/include
ln -sf asm-${arch} $dir/include/asm
+# Link in the additional header directories,
+# specified in header_dirs
+for i in asm-*
+do
+ case ${i#asm-} in
+ generic | @headers_dirs@)
+if [ ! -L $dir/include/${i} ]; then
+ ln -sf ../../linux-headers-$prefix/include/${i} $dir/include/${i}
+ fi
+ ;;
+ *)
+;;
+ esac
+done
+
find linux -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 \
! -name autoconf.h -a ! -name compile.h -a ! -name version.h \
-printf ../../../linux-headers-$prefix/include/linux/%f\n |
Processed: Re: include/asm-ppc/setup.h includes mk68k header files which aren't in the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 322610 patch Bug#322610: include/asm-ppc/setup.h includes mk68k header files which aren't in the package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
