Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Luther
reassign 375043 mkvmlinuz
thanks

Hi Meelis, 

This is a mkvmlinuz bug, not a kernel one, and i will try to fix it this WE.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:48:46AM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep
> Version: 2.6.16-15
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep still fails to generate a usable vmlinuz image like 
> the -powerpc package.
> 
> Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep (2.6.16-15) ...
> 
>  Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link 
> /lib/modules/2.6.16-2-prep/source
>  However, I can not read the target: No such file or directory
>  Therefore, I am deleting /lib/modules/2.6.16-2-prep/source
>
> Running depmod.
> Finding valid ramdisk creators.
> Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
> Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
> run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz
> Sorry, I do not know how to handle PowerPC sub-architecture prep in version 
> 2.6.16-2-prep.
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.17
> Locale: LANG=et_EE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=et_EE.ISO-8859-15 
> (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
> 
> Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep depends on:
> ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.60   tools for generating an initramfs
> ii  mkvmlinuz 22 create a kernel to boot a 
> PowerPC 
> ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing Linux kernel 
> mo
> 
> linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep recommends no packages.
> 
> -- debconf information:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-2-prep: 
> true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: false
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-2-prep:
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
>   linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-2-prep: false
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---
> Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. 
> Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 375043 mkvmlinuz
Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep' to `mkvmlinuz'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 375043 mkvmlinuz
Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz
Bug reassigned from package `mkvmlinuz' to `mkvmlinuz'.

> severity 375043 important
Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz

2006-06-22 Thread Bastian Blank
reassign 375043 mkvmlinuz
severity 375043 important
thanks

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:48:46AM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep still fails to generate a usable vmlinuz image like 
> the -powerpc package.

This is done by mkvmlinuz.

Bastian

-- 
The face of war has never changed.  Surely it is more logical to heal
than to kill.
-- Surak of Vulcan, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.5


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#374742: pcmciautils: fresh upstream available... can't make my card work :-((

2006-06-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Just wanted to make a disclaimer: I was running not debian stock kernel:
2.6.17-rc6-mm2

should I try stock one -- would it help to track down the issue?
(I will need to use kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4 though)

-- 
  .-.
=--   /v\  =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko  /(   )\   ICQ#: 60653192
   Linux User^^-^^[17]




pgpcqmA0wRpEo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RFC: swap on a LVM volume in debian-installer

2006-06-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:46:59PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> 
> I'm currently considering whether to change partman-auto-lvm so that the 
> swap partition is created as a lvm lv rather than a separate partition, 
> and I'd like to ask for some comments and feedback before doing so.

ack. cool, already using since long, as swap on lvm allows much more
flexibility.

 
> o suspend-to-disk
> There have been concerns that suspend/resume may not work with swap on a 
> lvm volume.
> 
> Using initramfs-tools, it seems perfectly possible to resume from a swap 
> partition on lvm (I do so daily). I am not sure whether yaird supports 
> this feature.

works right now fine on initramfs-tools.
thanks for addressing the trouble of multiple volume groups.
 
good work. :)

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#375043: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep: still fails to generate vmlinuz

2006-06-22 Thread Meelis Roos
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep
Version: 2.6.16-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep still fails to generate a usable vmlinuz image like 
the -powerpc package.

Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep (2.6.16-15) ...

 Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link /lib/modules/2.6.16-2-prep/source
 However, I can not read the target: No such file or directory
 Therefore, I am deleting /lib/modules/2.6.16-2-prep/source
   
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz
Sorry, I do not know how to handle PowerPC sub-architecture prep in version 
2.6.16-2-prep.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17
Locale: LANG=et_EE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=et_EE.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.60   tools for generating an initramfs
ii  mkvmlinuz 22 create a kernel to boot a PowerPC 
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-2-prep: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: false
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-2-prep:
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-prep: true
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-prep/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-2-prep: false


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFC: swap on a LVM volume in debian-installer

2006-06-22 Thread David Härdeman

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:58:27PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:

David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


o suspend-to-disk
There have been concerns that suspend/resume may not work with swap on
a lvm volume.


A patch was send today for initramfs-tools to address some issues of
it and in new upload should be fine. Am I right maks?


Yes, that patch was from yours truly.

Previously initramfs-tools would activate the LVM VG which contained the 
root LV, so if swap was on the same VG, it would be activated as a 
side-effect (and this is indeed how things are laid out with 
partman-auto-*).


The patch allows root and swap to be on different LVM VG's and should be 
included in the next initramfs-tools version after 0.64 (which is in 
incoming right now) according to maks on IRC.


Regards,
David



Re: RFC: swap on a LVM volume in debian-installer

2006-06-22 Thread Otavio Salvador
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The patch allows root and swap to be on different LVM VG's and should
> be included in the next initramfs-tools version after 0.64 (which is
> in incoming right now) according to maks on IRC.

Also, if you and partman-auto-lvm later move to use swap in lvm might
have more code share for crypto support in lvm too :-D That might be
awesome :-D

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."



Re: RFC: swap on a LVM volume in debian-installer

2006-06-22 Thread Otavio Salvador
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> o suspend-to-disk
> There have been concerns that suspend/resume may not work with swap on
> a lvm volume.

A patch was send today for initramfs-tools to address some issues of
it and in new upload should be fine. Am I right maks?

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."



Bug#352434: marked as done (tmpfs for /dev is ram/2)

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:35:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line tmpfs for /dev is ram/2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 0.084-3
Severity: normal

,
| tmpfstmpfs253M  112K  252M   1% /dev
`

This system has 512 MB RAM, and $tmpfs_size is still "10M" in the udev
init script.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  initscripts   2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii  libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libselinux1   1.28-2 SELinux shared libraries
ii  lsb-base  3.0-15 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
ii  makedev   2.3.1-79   creates device files in /dev
ii  sed   4.1.2-8The GNU sed stream editor

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.61

fixed in latest upload, pasting relevant changelog:
initramfs-tools (0.61) unstable; urgency=low

  Release "O partigiano portami via"

  * debian/TODO: update to latest state.

  * debian/bug: Fix reportbug script shebang line, add some descriptive echos.
Use exec to open file descriptor 3 for reportbug.

  * debian/control: Pump to 3.7.2 standard version without changes.

  * init: Use 10M as tmpfs_size for the udev /dev, that can be overriden in
/etc/udev/udev.conf. (closes: #352434)

  * /etc/initramfs-tools: Use the much more intituive conf dir location.
Thanks for the idea to Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

  * debian/initramfs-tools.preinst: mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
on upgrade as this should work even with drive space issues.
Thanks to Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the posix atomic
mv hint and Daniel Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for testing.

  * mkinitramfs: Set CONFDIR to /etc/initramfs-tools.

  * mkinitramfs.8, initramfs-tools.8: Document the new pathes.

  * debian/control: Change Build-depends-indep to Build-depends as we need
debhelper and cdbs for the clean target, fulfills policy 7.6.

  * debian/initramfs-tools.preinst: Warn and bail out if /etc/initramfs-tools
already exists.

-- 
maks
--- End Message ---


Bug#362816: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Initramfs-tools creates a buggy initrd image file.)

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:33:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line initramfs-tools: Doesn't find hdd (module ide-disk)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59b
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Today, I updated my system. It updated two things important I think :
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 and initramfs-tools. Strangely, linux-image was
already the same version, so apt just updated a up-to-date package.

But after rebooting (as it asked for during the install process), I
received the following message : "Begin : Waiting for root file
system..." and waiting for about 4 minutes, the Busybox shell was shown.

After some research, it turned out that the initrd image file had a
problem. I tred to fix it creating a new initrd image with mkinitramfs
-k 2.6.15-1-686 -u -t, but it showed the same problem at boot up. Then I
used mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-img-2.6.15-1-686 2.6.15-1-686 and it
worked well on reboot.

Strange, isn't it ?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_CH, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  busybox   1:1.01-4   Tiny utilities for small and embed
ii  cpio  2.6-11 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  klibc-utils   1.2.4-1small statically-linked utilities 
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-2tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  udev  0.085-1/dev/ and hotplug management daemo

initramfs-tools recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.62

fixed in latest upload, pasting relevant changelog:

initramfs-tools (0.62) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/control: We need at least udev 0.086-1, since earlier versions
had hooks, which don't load ide-disk automatically for 2.6.15 kernels.
Can't lower dependency to sarge version as it has no coldplug support
to escape udev dependency loop on upgrade. (closes: #358360, #362816)

  * hook-functions: Add arcmsr to the scsi modules list.

  * debian/NEWS: Add Notice about confdir mv as version 0.61.


thanks for your reports.

-- 
maks
--- End Message ---


Bug#368043: marked as done (initramfs-tools: postinstall script can require /usr/share/doc/)

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:31:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line initramfs-tools: postinstall script can require /usr/share/doc/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Severity: important
Justification: Packages must not require the existance of any files in
 /usr/share/doc in order to function.
 http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt

The postinstall script does:

|if [ ! -e /etc/mkinitramfs/modules ]; then
|cp /usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules /etc/mkinitramfs/
|fi

This code gets called on a dpkg-reconfigure, and can fail if the admin
has removed /etc/mkinitramfs/modules:

|$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure initramfs-tools
|cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules': No such 
file or directory

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.64

fixed in latest upload, pasting the relavant changelog:

initramfs-tools (0.64) unstable; urgency=low

  RELEASE o bella, ciao! bella, ciao!

  * debian/initramfs-tools.install: Add /etc/initramfs-tools/modules conffile,
instead of a cp from postinstall. (closes: #368043)

  * debian/control, update-initramfs.8, mkinitramfs.8: Capitalize RAM + NFS.
Rephrase nfs root support.

Thanks to Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the review.


thanks for your report.

-- 
maks
--- End Message ---


Bug#369314: Please add this when you get a chance

2006-06-22 Thread Daniel Dickinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have confirmed that this is required to successfully boot oldworld
mac after the install completes and am ready to make use of the
updated kernel, so if you could add the /proc/device-tree (openfirmware
device tree) to the miboot kernel it would be much appreciated.  Also,
if the regular d-i kernel used the same options as the kernel that is
installed on the system, it would be helpful (currently the d-i kernel
reports the device name, but not number, e.g. /bandit/ohare/mesh/sd
instead of /bandit/ohare/mesh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] reported by the full kernel).  
That
path is what I need to determine boot device for openfirmware purposes.

- -- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEmxDwhvWBpdQuHxwRAovtAJ0c5aqMa82maZQmh3SUz6zk6yDamQCgoB5/
bJKfIcIkiON+S/FKeXK9nTM=
=Mkit
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Bug#358360: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Doesn't find hdd (module ide-disk))

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:33:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line initramfs-tools: Doesn't find hdd (module ide-disk)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.57b
Severity: important

The description of this bug is the same as for #344754. The only
difference is the version of package. The solution presented in
#344754 works in my case as well. The problem appears with standard
Debian kernel 2.6.15-1-686-smp. I haven't tried any other kernels.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  busybox   1:1.01-4   Tiny utilities for small and embed
ii  cpio  2.6-11 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  klibc-utils   1.2.4-1small statically-linked utilities 
ii  udev  0.084-1/dev/ and hotplug management daemo

initramfs-tools recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.62

fixed in latest upload, pasting relevant changelog:

initramfs-tools (0.62) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/control: We need at least udev 0.086-1, since earlier versions
had hooks, which don't load ide-disk automatically for 2.6.15 kernels.
Can't lower dependency to sarge version as it has no coldplug support
to escape udev dependency loop on upgrade. (closes: #358360, #362816)

  * hook-functions: Add arcmsr to the scsi modules list.

  * debian/NEWS: Add Notice about confdir mv as version 0.61.


thanks for your reports.

-- 
maks
--- End Message ---


RFC: swap on a LVM volume in debian-installer

2006-06-22 Thread David Härdeman

Hi all,

in debian-installer, there is a package - partman-auto-lvm - which can 
setup an entire disk to be used for the debian installation with the use 
of lvm for most partitions.


Currently it sets up one boot partition, one swap partition and one lvm 
PV which is used for the rest of the partitions (usually root and 
possibly home depending on the recipe used).


I'm currently considering whether to change partman-auto-lvm so that the 
swap partition is created as a lvm lv rather than a separate partition, 
and I'd like to ask for some comments and feedback before doing so.


The last discussion of this feature seems to have been in this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/10/msg00842.html

===

So far, I've seen the following advantages and disadvantages of 
swap-on-lvm mentioned:


Advantages
==
o makes more partitions available to LVM

This means that the swap space can also be managed via the regular lvm 
tools. Swap space can be reclaimed, enlarged and shrunk using the 
regular tools when needed. E.g. if a larger swap space is needed, one can 
do a swapoff, lvextend, mkswap, swapon. In general, to get the most out 
of lvm, as many partitions as possible should use it.


Disadvantages
=
These are mostly gathered from the above thread:

o lowmem
I'm not sure this is an issue. If root is already accessed via lvm, will 
accessing swap via lvm make a difference in lowmem situations?


o suspend-to-disk
There have been concerns that suspend/resume may not work with swap on a 
lvm volume.


Using initramfs-tools, it seems perfectly possible to resume from a swap 
partition on lvm (I do so daily). I am not sure whether yaird supports 
this feature.


o overhead
Accessing swap via the LVM layer might introduce additional overhead.

However, the LVM maintainer disagreed in the above thread, noting that 
swap should be an io-bound operation and I tend to agree.


Note that these disadvantages might be i386 oriented, are there any 
other disadvantages on other arches, or on i386 for that matter, that 
I've overlooked?


Discussion of additional advantages would also be welcome of course :)

===

The reason that I'm personally interested is that swap-on-lvm as the 
default for a lvm install would allow the experimental partman-auto-crypto 
(a package which uses partman-crypto and partman-auto-lvm to 
automatically partition a disk so that any partition except /boot will 
be encrypted) to share 90% of its code with partman-auto-lvm.


Comments welcome.

Regards,
David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368043: marked as done (initramfs-tools: postinstall script can require /usr/share/doc/)

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:18:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368043: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Severity: important
Justification: Packages must not require the existance of any files in
 /usr/share/doc in order to function.
 http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt

The postinstall script does:

|if [ ! -e /etc/mkinitramfs/modules ]; then
|cp /usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules /etc/mkinitramfs/
|fi

This code gets called on a dpkg-reconfigure, and can fail if the admin
has removed /etc/mkinitramfs/modules:

|$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure initramfs-tools
|cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules': No such 
file or directory

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: initramfs-tools
Source-Version: 0.64

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
initramfs-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated initramfs-tools 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:45:59 +0200
Source: initramfs-tools
Binary: initramfs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.64
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian kernel team 
Changed-By: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 initramfs-tools - tools for generating an initramfs
Closes: 368043
Changes: 
 initramfs-tools (0.64) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   RELEASE o bella, ciao! bella, ciao!
 .
   * debian/initramfs-tools.install: Add /etc/initramfs-tools/modules conffile,
 instead of a cp from postinstall. (closes: #368043)
 .
   * debian/control, update-initramfs.8, mkinitramfs.8: Capitalize RAM + NFS.
 Rephrase nfs root support.
 .
 Thanks to Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
 Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the review.
Files: 
 33b8d7b18f67223c73b4267be4c01146 623 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
 cd2e18afaee7da00e1e081b19012106f 38559 utils optional 
initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
 a071c05d3b124e06ae18d89742af2039 44600 utils optional 
initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEmvCjXKRQ3lK3SH4RAupZAJ4rPHzUsBNU5E9t0yOL2ClTFijWmACfUb1M
fsNJfreeNHIsuObRCQKMvWw=
=emvv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


initramfs-tools_0.64_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 368043 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:37:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 20:51]:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> > > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17
> > > > or 2) create separate metapackages for linux-2.6 
> > > > (linux-image-2.6-686-sid,
> > > > for example).
> > > 
> > > AFAIK the plan is the following:
> > > - linux-2.6 remains the metapackages, the point to the last available
> > >   one.
> > > - linux-2.6.16 contains no metapackages.
> > > - linux-latest-2.6 or so contains the metapackages to match linux-2.6.16
> > >   and have to go through t-p-u.
> > 
> > fwiw, this doesn't provide a way for people to track the proposed etch
> > kernel in sid, which may reduce the number of testers of that kernel
> > prior to migration.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I think there should be agreement on which meta packages point to where
> before bumping meta packages version numbers, and we should find a way
> that encourages as many people as possible in both etch and unstable to
> test etch kernels.

yes and that is let people install the 2.6.17 kernel.
2.6.17 is still heavily considered as etch target.

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#375035: (no subject)

2006-06-22 Thread root
Subject: kernel: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running 
initramfs init
Package: kernel
Severity: important

After upgrading from 2.6.15-1-powerpc to 2.6.16-2-powerpc I received the
message "VFS: Cannot open root device /dev/sda8 or 
unknown-block(somenumber, somenumber)"

I checked the initrd and it contains the necessary modules, but none of the 
initrd's console messages appear on the console before the error message
which leads me to believe that the kernel is attempting to look at the root
device before loading the module needed to see it.  The root device requires
the mesh module (scsi hba) which is in the initrd.

I have confirmed that the failed boot stops at the point where the initrd
is loaded by carefully watching the boot messages with a working boot 
with 2.6.15.  The point where the initramfs (initrd-xxx.img) is loaded appears
to be after the freeing memory line.  

I indicate where the VFS: message appears during an unsuccesfull booth 
with 
-->2.6.16 dies here<--
in the dmesg output below (from a successful boot of 2.6.15)

Total memory = 96MB; using 256kB for hash table (at c034)
Linux version 2.6.15-1-powerpc (Debian 2.6.15-8) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc 
version 4.0.3 20060304 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-10)) #2 Mon Mar 6 12:39:17 
CET 2006
Found a OHare mac-io controller, rev: 1, mapped at 0xfddc
PowerMac motherboard: Unknown OHare-based
Cache coherency enabled for bandit/PSX
Found Bandit PCI host bridge at 0xf200. Firmware bus number: 0->0
nvram: OF partition at 0x1800
nvram: XP partition at 0x1300
nvram: NR partition at 0x1400
On node 0 totalpages: 24576
  DMA zone: 24576 pages, LIFO batch:7
  DMA32 zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
  Normal zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
  HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
Built 1 zonelists
Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda8 ro 
System has 32 possible interrupts
PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 9, 8192 bytes)
GMT Delta read from XPRAM: -240 minutes, DST: on
via_calibrate_decr: ticks per jiffy = 1 (600019 ticks)
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
serial8250_console_init: nothing to do on PowerMac
Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Memory: 88376k available (2172k kernel code, 920k data, 172k init, 0k highmem)
Calibrating delay loop... 318.46 BogoMIPS (lpj=159232)
Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
Capability LSM initialized
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
checking if image is initramfs... it is
Freeing initrd memory: 5354k freed
NET: Registered protocol family 16
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 1 of device :00:11.0
Registering pmac pic with sysfs...
Thermal assist unit not available
audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled)
audit(1151007009.660:1): initialized
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
Initializing Cryptographic API
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered
PCI: Enabling device :00:11.0 (0082 -> 0083)
atyfb: ATI264VTA4 (Mach64 VT) [0x5654 rev 0x40]
atyfb: 2M EDO, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 200 MHz PLL, 63 Mhz MCLK, 67 MHz XCLK
atyfb: monitor sense=51e, mode 7
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30
atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
Generic RTC Driver v1.07
Macintosh non-volatile memory driver v1.1
serial8250_init: nothing to do on PowerMac
pmac_zilog: 0.6 (Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
ttyS0 at MMIO 0xf3013020 (irq = 15) is a Z85c30 ESCC - Serial port
ttyS1 at MMIO 0xf3013000 (irq = 16) is a Z85c30 ESCC - Serial port
fd0: SWIM3 floppy controller 
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize
MacIO PCI driver attached to OHare chipset
Can't request resource 0 for MacIO device 0.f300:ohare
input: Macintosh mouse button emulation as /class/input/input0
Macintosh CUDA driver v0.5 for Unified ADB.
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
adb: starting probe task...
ide0: Found Apple OHare ATA controller, bus ID 0, irq 13
Probing IDE interface ide0...
adb devices: [2]: 2 1b [3]: 3 1
ADB keyboard at 2, handler set to 3
Detected ADB keyboard, type ANSI.
input: ADB keyboard as /class/input/input1
ADB mouse at 3, handler set to 2
input: ADB mouse as /class/input/input2
adb: finished probe task...
ide1: Found Apple OHare ATA controller, bus ID 1, irq 14
Probing IDE interface ide1...
hdc: MATSHITA CR-585, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdc: Enabling MultiWord DMA 1
ide1 at 0xc701c000-0xc701c007,0xc701c160 on irq 14
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP route cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
TCP: H

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-22 Thread Andreas Barth
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 20:51]:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17
> > > or 2) create separate metapackages for linux-2.6 (linux-image-2.6-686-sid,
> > > for example).
> > 
> > AFAIK the plan is the following:
> > - linux-2.6 remains the metapackages, the point to the last available
> >   one.
> > - linux-2.6.16 contains no metapackages.
> > - linux-latest-2.6 or so contains the metapackages to match linux-2.6.16
> >   and have to go through t-p-u.
> 
> fwiw, this doesn't provide a way for people to track the proposed etch
> kernel in sid, which may reduce the number of testers of that kernel
> prior to migration.

Agreed.

I think there should be agreement on which meta packages point to where
before bumping meta packages version numbers, and we should find a way
that encourages as many people as possible in both etch and unstable to
test etch kernels.

I see two ways:
1. linux-image-2.6 -> very latest, and (perhaps) something like
   linux-image-etch -> etch kernels (plus in etch, linux-image-2.6 ->
   etch)
2. linux-image-2.6 -> etch kernels, linux-image-2.6-latest to most
   current

I think the 2nd way would give us more etch kernel testers, because most
people will just stay with linux-image-2.6 - but of course I'm a bit
biased for more etch testing (well, but most people here will have a
different bias, so I think that's ok :).

Comments?


Cheers,
Andi


BTW: I would really prefer some kind of "we're now doing foo and bar" to
debian-release prior to upload if there was no previous agreement with
the release team to prevent release team members getting panic attacks
on seeing 2.6.17 being uploaded. :)
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of initramfs-tools_0.64_i386.changes

2006-06-22 Thread Archive Administrator
initramfs-tools_0.64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  initramfs-tools_0.64.dsc
  initramfs-tools_0.64.tar.gz
  initramfs-tools_0.64_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Macbook support for Debian Etch.

2006-06-22 Thread Otavio Salvador
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> elilo has support for it and grub now has support using Bootcamp
>> updated firmware.
>
> current grub and not grub2, right?

Yes.

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#364637: any other way around pmac_zilog problem? WAS: Bug#364637: I see, change in 8250.c between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:52:34AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] 
wrote:
> Hi
> 
> The conflict between pmac_zilog and the 8250/16550 driver still exists in the
> latest daily images.  Is there any other way around the issue besides patching
> the source for 8250.c?

If 2.6.17 doesn't fix this, then i will have a look.

> Is there a way to change the order in which the kernel attempts the drivers,
> to have pmac_zilog go before 8250.c?

Since they are both builtin, i think it would be difficult.

> I can't really fix this myself, because I can't get a working debian 
> installation
> to do it on.  Anyone have a workaround?

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15_m68k.changes

2006-06-22 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all-m68k_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-image-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all-m68k_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all-m68k_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-headers-2.6.16-2_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-atari_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-bvme6000_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-hp_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-mac_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme147_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-mvme16x_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-q40_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-sun3_2.6.16-15_m68k.deb


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#364637: any other way around pmac_zilog problem? WAS: Bug#364637: I see, change in 8250.c between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16

2006-06-22 Thread Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
Hi

The conflict between pmac_zilog and the 8250/16550 driver still exists in the
latest daily images.  Is there any other way around the issue besides patching
the source for 8250.c?

Is there a way to change the order in which the kernel attempts the drivers,
to have pmac_zilog go before 8250.c?

I can't really fix this myself, because I can't get a working debian 
installation
to do it on.  Anyone have a workaround?

Thanks,
Toni


On Thu, 18 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:

  > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:37:24AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford 
[Contr] wrote:
  > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Brad Boyer wrote:
  > >
  > >   > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
  > >   > > > What is supposed to happen after 'Trying to im_free...' ?
  > >   > >
  > >   > > Attaching the full log. The isa stuff is probably related to the 
graphic card.
  > >   > >
  > >   >
  > >   > > Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing 
disabled
  > >   > > pmac_zilog: 0.6 (Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
  > >   > > pmac_zilog: Error registering serial device, disabling pmac_zilog.
  > >   > > pmac_zilog: Did another serial driver already claim the minors?
  > >   > > Trying to im_free nonexistent area (d8008216c000)
  > >   > > Trying to im_free nonexistent area (d8008216e000)
  > >   >
  > >   > Here is the problem. The 8250/16550 driver used to have a check to 
make
  > >   > it bail out on all PowerMac models. It used to print out a message to
  > >   > that fact, too. The pmac_zilog driver is dying a miserable death 
because
  > >   > it thinks it should be the only serial driver, but in this case it 
isn't.
  > >   >
  > >   >   Brad Boyer
  > >   >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > >   >
  > >
  > > I see.  Comparing drivers/serial/8250.c between the debian kernel source
  > > packages for testing (2.6.15-8) and unstable (2.6.16-12) shows a number
  > > of missing ifdefs.  But are these differences because changes which need
  > > to be continued were just not applied to 2.6.16, or did someone feel
  > > that these ifdefs were no longer needed and removed them?
  >
  > Indeed, that was the patch. It is disabled, probablybecause it doesn't apply
  > anymore, and needs redoing.
  >
  > Friendly,
  >
  > Sven Luther
  >
  >
  > --
  > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >

---
Toni Harbaugh-Blackford   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator
Advanced Biomedical Computing Center (ABCC)
National Cancer Institute
Contractor - SAIC/Frederick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#374983: nanosleep fails to sleep

2006-06-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal

The following program fails to sleep properly (on 64bit cpus != ia64):

#include 
#include 

int main() {
struct timespec req = {(1L<<34), 0};
printf("nanosleep = %d\n", nanosleep(&req, NULL));
perror("error ");
return 0;
}

The nanosleep syscall just returns imediatly without any error or
delay.

I believe this is caused by the conversion from struct timespec
(128bit) to ktime_t (64bit) where the upper 32bits of the seconds are
lost (leaving 0 as sleep time). [in kernel/hrtimer.c:
hrtimer_nanosleep()].

The sys_nanosleep() should probably check not only for
timespec_valid() but also guard against such an overflow.


But there is more to it:

At the time of writing a "sleep 9218114349" will sleep but a "sleep
9219114349" will just return. The value where this happens decreases
with time. The critical point seems to be a fixed wallclock time. I
think that effect is caused in 'kernel/hrtimer.c: hrtimer_start()' by

tim = ktime_add(tim, new_base->get_time());

causing an overflow.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#374742: pcmciautils: fresh upstream available... can't make my card work :-((

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 374742 kernel
Bug#374742: pcmciautils: fresh upstream available... can't make my card work 
:-((
Bug reassigned from package `pcmciautils' to `kernel'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.17-1_powerpc.changes

2006-06-22 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.17-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  linux-doc-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-manual-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-patch-debian-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-source-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-support-2.6.17-1_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-tree-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-all_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-all-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-vserver_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6.17-1-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linux-2.6_2.6.17-1_powerpc.changes is NEW

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Installer
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-all-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
All header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17
 This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files
 for Linux kernel version 2.6.17, generally used for building out-of-tree
 kernel modules.
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-all_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
All header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17
 This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files
 for Linux kernel version 2.6.17, generally used for building out-of-tree
 kernel modules.
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-miboot-class machines
 This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for
 Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-miboot-class machines, generally used for
 building out-of-tree kernel modules.  These files are going to be
 installed into /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-miboot, and can be
 used for building modules that load into the kernel provided by the
 linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc-miboot package.
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-smp-class machines
 This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for
 Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-smp-class machines, generally used for
 building out-of-tree kernel modules.  These files are going to be
 installed into /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc-smp, and can be
 used for building modules that load into the kernel provided by the
 linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc-smp package.
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc64_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc64-class machines
 This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for
 Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc64-class machines, generally used for
 building out-of-tree kernel modules.  These files are going to be
 installed into /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc64, and can be used
 for building modules that load into the kernel provided by the
 linux-image-2.6.17-1-powerpc64 package.
(new) linux-headers-2.6.17-1-powerpc_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-class machines
 This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for
 Linux kernel 2.6.17 on powerpc-class machines, generally used for bui

Bug#374891: initramfs-tools: activate resume volume group

2006-06-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 01:35:16PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> 
> Ah, I see, that explains some parts of the lvm script that I didn't
> understand. Have you already fixed lilo support on top of my patch or do
> you want an updated patch?
> 
> Regards,
> David

yes fixed in latest repo.

currently i have some hand binded as mentors.debian.net does not parse
the Uploaders control field, so my uploaded packages land nowhere.
hope that gets resolved soon.

also the bzr story leads me to dump that playground and switch soon
to git, than latest repo should get available again.

regards

-- 
maks



Re: Bug#374742: pcmciautils: fresh upstream available... can't make my card work :-((

2006-06-22 Thread Per Olofsson
reassign 374742 kernel
thanks

Hi,

Yaroslav Halchenko:
> Ha ha! Just wanted to share my experience... by poking around I've
> decided to try pccardctl suspend/resume... and you know -- that brought
> my modem online and bounded it to serial_cs
>
> Socket 0:
>   5.0V 16-bit PC Card
>   Subdevice 0 (function 0) bound to driver "serial_cs"
> 
> so whenever I eject/insert it I have first to suspend it and then
> resume. I think it might be of help for someone (README/howto?),
> that is why I decided to report.
> 
> And btw -- after I've upgraded to 014 version, I've at least got a
> device in udev fs and 
> 
> > sudo pccardctl info
> PRODID_1=""
> PRODID_2=""
> PRODID_3=""
> PRODID_4=""
> MANFID=2020,2020
> FUNCID=255
> 
> eject/insert brought modem back to unrecognizable state... then
> suspend/resume did the miracle. What do you think would be the best
> place where to automate (if possible) this "handshaking" with the modem
> to make it alive? 

I don't think it should be automated at all, it's probably a bug in
the kernel which should be fixed.

> Just FYI about my miracle modem:
> 
> SUBSYSTEM=="pcmcia"
> 
> SYSFS{modalias}=="pcmcia:m016Cc0001f02fn00pfn00paF5F025C2pb200E6E61pc26477DB8pdC5F4D6FD"
> SYSFS{prod_id4}=="V8.041"
> SYSFS{prod_id3}=="56K+Fax"
> SYSFS{prod_id2}=="Gold Card Global 56K+Fax"
> SYSFS{prod_id1}=="Psion Dacom"
> SYSFS{card_id}=="0x0001"
> SYSFS{manf_id}=="0x016c"
> SYSFS{func_id}=="0x02"
> SYSFS{pm_state}=="on"
> SYSFS{function}=="0x00"
> 



-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#374891: initramfs-tools: activate resume volume group

2006-06-22 Thread David Härdeman
On Thu, June 22, 2006 2:11, maximilian attems said:
> although the cleanup might hurt users with lilo and lvm root user.
> as lilo passes the root as major and minor, we need to check for "fe" too.
> current lvm hook is very sloppy and tries to activate anything.
> see #357538
>
> something like this to match current behaviour:
>
> case $vg in
>   fe[0-9]+)
>   vgchange -ay
>   return
>   ;;
> esac

Ah, I see, that explains some parts of the lvm script that I didn't
understand. Have you already fixed lilo support on top of my patch or do
you want an updated patch?

Regards,
David



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315110: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686: Module smc-ircc too verbose in dmesg when irda-utils in discovery mode.)

2006-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:14:36 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686: irda driver smsc-ircc2 under  
kernel-image-2.6.8doesn't seem to work.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: normal


Hi,

I needed to set irda-utils to discovery mode (using 'dpkg-reconfigure
irda-utils') and since then the smc-ircc module is sending continuously
the following one-line to dmesg:

irport_hard_xmit_Rac256893()

so that nothing meaningful remains in the buffer.

Relevant part of /etc/modutils/irda-utils:
# For FIR device

options smc-ircc ircc_dma=3 ircc_irq=7 ircc_cfg=0x4e ircc_sir=0x3e8 
ircc_fir=0x130
alias irda0 smc-ircc

Thanks, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities 
ii  initrd-tools  0.1.81.1   tools to create initrd image for p
ii  modutils  2.4.26-1.2 Linux module utilities

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

going through my old bugs, I'm closing some of them which are not relevant
anymore. Giving a last status:

- I'm now under etch with 2.6.15
- and if I remember well, I anyway solved the issue by disabling IRQ 7 for
the parallel port. The probleme seemed hence to be that either lp or irda
(or both) is not able to share properly the IRQ. But I didn't check if
it's still the case with 2.6.15.

Thanks for the help anyway,
Eric


-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
--- End Message ---