Bug#451805: linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22 dies early on boot / Starting ELF64 kernel

2007-11-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-23 19:04]:
  Can you test a kernel if I compile one with that change?
 Definitly - tested and rebooted a couple hundret times the last days ;)

Can you try
http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/linux-image-2.6.23-1-r4k-ip22_2.6.23-1~experimental.1_mips.deb
It contains the 3 patches Thomas posted yesterday evening.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#286939: dial-nih

2007-11-24 Thread reinhard Kutzner
you will not find another opportunity to buy at these prices http://immary.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#305671: eriaguok

2007-11-24 Thread Orest kambar
watches heavily discounted so you can enjoy a better christmas 
http://www.hpfsms.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#376652: liquifor

2007-11-24 Thread hoiiiu sprinkle
buy today and have it delivered for xmas, your partner will love it 
http://ipodjock.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#451805: linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22 dies early on boot / Starting ELF64 kernel

2007-11-24 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:01:44PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-23 19:04]:
   Can you test a kernel if I compile one with that change?
  Definitly - tested and rebooted a couple hundret times the last days ;)
 
 Can you try
 http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/linux-image-2.6.23-1-r4k-ip22_2.6.23-1~experimental.1_mips.deb
 It contains the 3 patches Thomas posted yesterday evening.

Okay - i comes past the typical trip points but later when going
to userspace throws errors a lot ...

Activating swap:swapon on /dev/sdf2
allocation failed: out of vmalloc space - use vmalloc=size to increase size.
swapon: /dev/sdf2: Cannot alloallocation failed: out of vmalloc space - use 
vmalloc=size to increase size.
cate memory
swapon on /dev/sde2
swapon: /dev/sde2: Cannot allocate memory
 failed!

The out of vmalloc space appears a couple dozend times booting.

resume:~# uname -a
Linux resume.rfc822.org 2.6.23-1-r4k-ip22 #1 Sat Nov 24 10:56:20 UTC 2007 
mips64 GNU/Linux
resume:~# uptime
 21:33:34 up 4 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.39, 0.19
cresume:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : SGI Indigo2
processor   : 0
cpu model   : R4400SC V6.0  FPU V0.0
BogoMIPS: 124.41
wait instruction: no
microsecond timers  : yes
tlb_entries : 48
extra interrupt vector  : no
hardware watchpoint : yes
ASEs implemented:
VCED exceptions : 542600
VCEI exceptions : 26488

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff  [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little 
  security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


System crash caused by the powernow-k8 kernel module

2007-11-24 Thread Teodor
Hi,

I'm having Debian GNU/Linux installed on my workstation with AMD
Athlon(tm) 64 X2 4800+ (actually 2.5GHz). From the very beginning after
the install I was getting multiple system freezes. This happens with
both linux images from unstable (2.6.22-3-amd64) and testing
(2.6.22-2-amd64).

Recently I've found that is caused by the powernow-k8 kernel module. I
can reproduce the problem easily by activating the 'Cool n Quiet'
option in the BIOS and just reboot the system. The freeze usually
happens after I'm logged in the X session probably when the load is
growing.

As a temporary workaround I've blacklisted the powernow-k8 module and
no more system freezes.

I would like to fill a bug report but I'm afraid I don't have enough
useful information to give. Can you tell me how can I debug a kernel
panic/crash?

Thanks for your help.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#288011: terretje

2007-11-24 Thread hoeun Fleck
holiday deals means we sell cheap, delivery before xmas http://www.hotmedl.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Patch: Hide process info from other users/users not in my group

2007-11-24 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:44:56PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 this patch provides three new kernel options and restricts the access modes of
 /proc/pid-dirs either to 550 or 500 in order to provide some privacy to
 users. Tools like lsof and ps to spy out on other users become
 ineffective. The options are added at File system drivers - Pseudo 
 Filesystems
 - proc. Maybe somebody's interested.

hey Daniel,
 If you'd like to get this included in the Debian kernel (though this
may not have not have been your intention), it needs to be accepted
upstream first. For more information on our patch acceptance
guidelines, see:
  http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#451805: linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22 dies early on boot / Starting ELF64 kernel

2007-11-24 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:34:03PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
 Okay - i comes past the typical trip points but later when going
 to userspace throws errors a lot ...

hmm, I trusted Ralf, that the MAP_BASE change is needed for getting
modules to work, but it looks like it breaks vmalloc. And it looks
like modules should even work, if MAP_BASE is 0xc000.
Does reverting that patch help ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.[ RFC1925, 2.3 ]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#433187: [Fwd: Re: Fix for sparc64 cpu hangs.]

2007-11-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:13:20PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 dann frazier wrote:
  On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:53:51PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
  A sparc build hasn't appeared in the snapshots repo yet, but I've
  posted a build of the latest here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/433187/sparc-result/
  
  A sparc snapshot is now available on buildserver.net, so I'm going to
  remove this one to free space on gluck.
  
 
 
 There're a few machines running with the patched kernel now, it seems to
 work well, but we have several lines of
 
 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
 
 on the consoles of all machines.
 Nothing more interesting in the log, though.

Thanks Bernd. Though this is in the futex code, I think its just a
coincidence and not a regression as I see the same messages on my
unpatched system:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg | tail -10; cat /proc/version 
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[468930] compat_exit_robust_list+0xbc/0x108
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[466c28] handle_futex_death+0x20/0x90
eth0: RX MAC fifo overflow smac[02010400].
Linux version 2.6.18-5-sparc64-smp (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-16) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP 
Thu Oct 4 14:08:25 UTC 2007

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]