Bug#504167: Still Present in 2.6.26-10 (Re: Bug: #504167 linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume)
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-10 Followup-For: Bug #504167 Reporting this issue is also confirmed with 2.6.26-10. Mark -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.92l tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.4-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 suggests: ii grub 0.97-47lenny1 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v pn linux-doc-2.6.26 none(no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#505435: linux-2.6: The Build-Depends on kernel-package needs upgrading (leads to FTBFS)
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-8 Severity: normal Bkernel-package is limited to = 1.10.23 (Blinux-2.6 of 2.6.26-10 is the same, at time of bugreporting). Build against 11.001-0.1 (I know, that was the highest version in (local) repo at build time) FTBFS -- buildlog[*] in attach. Build against 11.0011 (current in testing) succeeds. [*] Do I really must upload the whole stuff? It's even bzipped 0.5Mb! Though if I cut out something important, then I will. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (700, 'oldstable'), (700, 'testing'), (700, 'stable'), (110, 'oldstable'), (110, 'testing'), (110, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) foo.linux-2.6_with_skip.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data
Bug#505440: initramfs-tools: leaks environment
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92l Severity: important A lot of the environment is leaked into into creating problems in other init scripts. I'm not sure whether the severity is right, but some other init scripts do not work as expected because of some of the environment they inherit. Here's a list created by adding env $(mktemp -t foobar.env.) to the boot process: CONSOLE=/dev/console SELINUX_INIT=YES break= TERM=linux rootmnt=/root INIT_VERSION=sysvinit-2.86 init=/sbin/init panic= PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin _=/usr/bin/env RUNLEVEL=S runlevel=S PWD=/ resume=/dev/hda5 ROOTFSTYPE= VERBOSE=no MODPROBE_OPTIONS=-qb resume_offset= PREVLEVEL=N previous=N ROOT=/dev/disk/by-uuid/cc016eb2-5e03-476c-936f-b2195a49b46f quiet=n ROOTFLAGS= SHLVL=2 ROOTDELAY= HOME=/ BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 DPKG_ARCH=i386 blacklist= readonly=y Michael -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64 root=UUID=7f264e00-a4ae-45a5-88c4-aa077b575515 ro -- /proc/filesystems ext3 fuseblk iso9660 vfat -- lsmod Module Size Used by nls_utf86272 0 nls_cp437 11136 0 vfat 14976 0 fat51128 1 vfat isofs 35880 0 nls_base 12932 5 nls_utf8,nls_cp437,vfat,fat,isofs zlib_inflate 18944 1 isofs iwl394592916 0 mac80211 162864 1 iwl3945 nfs 251696 0 lockd 68560 1 nfs nfs_acl 7552 1 nfs sunrpc197480 5 nfs,lockd,nfs_acl i915 35072 1 drm91488 2 i915 rfcomm 38176 1 l2cap 23936 5 rfcomm bluetooth 57124 4 rfcomm,l2cap tun14084 1 vboxdrv 1658800 1 ppdev 11656 0 lp 14724 0 autofs424200 2 acpi_cpufreq 11792 0 cpufreq_powersave 6400 0 cpufreq_stats 9120 0 cpufreq_ondemand 11792 2 freq_table 9344 3 acpi_cpufreq,cpufreq_stats,cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative11784 0 cpufreq_userspace 8452 0 ipv6 288328 14 bridge 53544 0 quota_v2 12800 2 fuse 53184 1 aes_x86_64 12416 1 aes_generic32552 1 aes_x86_64 cbc 7936 1 dm_crypt 17032 1 dm_mod 58864 3 dm_crypt loop 19468 0 arc46272 2 ecb 7296 2 crypto_blkcipher 21636 4 cbc,dm_crypt,ecb snd_hda_intel 434776 1 snd_pcm81672 1 snd_hda_intel snd_seq54304 0 parport_pc 31016 1 led_class 8968 1 iwl3945 yenta_socket 27916 1 snd_timer 25744 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 11668 1 snd_seq rng_core8968 0 rsrc_nonstatic 14080 1 yenta_socket snd63688 7 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device parport41776 3 ppdev,lp,parport_pc psmouse42268 0 pcspkr 7040 0 serio_raw 9860 0 iTCO_wdt 15696 0 cfg80211 30224 2 iwl3945,mac80211 container 8320 0 ac 9352 0 video 24084 0 output 7808 1 video wmi11712 0 battery16904 0 soundcore 12064 1 snd snd_page_alloc 13072 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm intel_agp 31728 1 button 11680 0 evdev 14208 11 ext3 124944 5 jbd51240 1 ext3 mbcache12804 1 ext3 ide_cd_mod 36360 0 cdrom 37928 1 ide_cd_mod ata_generic10116 0 sd_mod 29376 7 usbhid 45792 0 hid41792 1 usbhid ff_memless 9224 1 usbhid b4429968 0 piix 12424 0 [permanent] ahci 32520 6 libata165472 2 ata_generic,ahci scsi_mod 160760 2 sd_mod,libata ssb43140 1 b44 pcmcia 38680 1 ssb pcmcia_core41508 4 yenta_socket,rsrc_nonstatic,ssb,pcmcia firmware_class 12544 2 iwl3945,pcmcia mii 9856 1 b44 dock 14112 1 libata ohci1394 32564 0 ide_pci_generic 9220 0 [permanent] ide_core 128284 3 ide_cd_mod,piix,ide_pci_generic ieee1394 93816 1 ohci1394 ehci_hcd 36108 0 uhci_hcd 25760 0 thermal22688 0 processor 42304 4 acpi_cpufreq,thermal fan
Bug#420602: kernel fails to boot on SunBlade 100
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Kolargol double zero wrote: If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4? Thanks for your suggestion Moritz. I've tried that by installing packages linux-image-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf (version 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1) and linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-sparc64 (version 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.6). My machine boots correctly with a nice console :) but the built-in Ethernet device doesn't work anymore... :( Could this be related to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10273 ? Quite likely. #10273 was introduced in 2.6.23 and fixed in 2.6.25.4. To verify you could apply the patch provided by David Miller http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;a=commit;h=227c3311786dbe64cb221e63d53817f98240e587 to your 2.6.24 kernel or alternatively you could upgrade to Lenny, which is based on 2.6.26 and won't change very much any more, since the release is close. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420602: kernel fails to boot on SunBlade 100
If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4? Thanks for your suggestion Moritz. I've tried that by installing packages linux-image-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf (version 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1) and linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-sparc64 (version 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.6). My machine boots correctly with a nice console :) but the built-in Ethernet device doesn't work anymore... :( Could this be related to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10273 ? Regards, Etienne _ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-ussource=wlmailtagline -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494936: possible solution
Hi, I've encountered the exact same bug, but I could circumvent the issue by removing the need to load bnx2 in the initrd: remove bnx2 from /etc/initramfs-tools/modules update-initramfs -u Now it works, but loading bnx2 in the initrd still fails. Regards, Bjoern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428614: bug still present in trunk (2.6.24~rc6-1~experimental.1~snapshot.10007)
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:30:05 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:04:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: I tried linux-image-2.6.24-rc6-amd64 (version 2.6.24~rc6-1~experimental.1~snapshot.10007) from trunk, but I still experience this bug: $ ls -altrF /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2008-01-02 21:05 ../ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2008-01-02 21:05 ./ Does this still occur with the current Lenny kernel? Yes, it does: $ ls -altrF /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2008-11-12 21:43 ../ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2008-11-12 21:43 ./ If so, could you please file a bugreport at bugzilla.kernel.org? Mmmmh, it seems that bugzilla.kernel.org is another upstream BTS which quite annoyingly requires creating an account in order to allow users to report bugs... I am already going mad remembering tens of passwords for various boxes/services: if I start creating one account for the upstream BTS of each Debian package I use and want to report bugs for, my brain will really explode! That's why I love the Debian BTS, it lets users interact with it via e-mail, without requiring any account creation process. Could you please forward this bug report to bugzilla.kernel.org? Thank you in advance. -- On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND nano-documents may lead you to my website... . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpfSRg9LtKr7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#410817: Upstream fix in 2.6.26?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:31:04PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote: dann frazier wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6695 2.6.26 is in lenny/sid - can someone test it to confirm? 2.6.26-1-686 from lenny boots my DELL SC400 with 6.62 firmware on the megaraid card. The boot was quite slow, but I'm comparing to a bespoke kernel without initrd, so that is not surprising. I have hacked on the box in the past to include additional megaraid drivers in the initrd config, so I can't say it a completely clean test, but I'd regard this as a fix (Stock 2.6.25 no boot, stock 2.6.26 boots). I will attempt a reinstall soon. Have you tested a reinstall already? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432142: marked as done (Panic on G4 Pegasos II)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:25 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Panic on G4 Pegasos II has caused the Debian Bug report #432142, regarding Panic on G4 Pegasos II to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 432142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432142 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-powerpc Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 I have a panic in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 on a Pegasos II with a G4. It wrote to screen, but not to disc. Had to revert back to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 as 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch1 would hang with a black screen. I.e. 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch1 wrote nothing at all? These happen when I check the machine after it has been idle. The last log entries show that it happened when machine was quiet. Using mol-modules-2.6.18-4-powerpc version 2.6.18+0.9.71.dfsg-8 Kernel command line: video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED] root=/dev/hda2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.6.26-1 The submitter confirmed in a off-bug reply, that this issue is fixed in 2.6.26. ---End Message---
Bug#433640: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.22-1 Severity: normal When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon. Is this issue still reproducible with the current Lenny kernel? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433640: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow
When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon. Is this issue still reproducible with the current Lenny kernel? can be closed thanks Folkert van Heusden -- Multi tail barnamaj mowahib li mora9abat attasjilat wa nataij awamir al 7asoub. damj, talwin, mora9abat attarchi7 wa ila akhirih. http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/ -- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433640: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:13:17 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow has caused the Debian Bug report #433640, regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 433640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433640 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.22-1 Severity: normal When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.22-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.22-1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13)) #1 SMP Mon Jul 16 00:30:42 UTC 2007 ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: ide0 at 0x7000-0x7007,0x7402 on irq 16 Probing IDE interface ide1... hdb: ATAPI 40X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2000kB Cache, UDMA(66) Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.0-ioctl (2006-10-12) initialised: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attempting manual resume kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. agpgart: Detected an Intel 965G Chipset. agpgart: Detected 7676K stolen memory. agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe000 input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input1 iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.01 (21-Jan-2007) ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.3[C] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 usb0: register 'plusb' at usb-:00:1d.2-2, Prolific PL-2301/PL-2302, 7a:29:1b:44:29:73 usbcore: registered new interface driver plusb ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1b.0[A] - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1b.0 to 64 input: ImPS/2 Logitech Wheel Mouse as /class/input/input2 pnp: the driver 'parport_pc' has been registered pnp: match found with the PnP device '00:07' and the driver 'parport_pc' parport_pc 00:07: reported by Plug and Play ACPI parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 3 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA] iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH8 or ICH8R TCO device (Version=2, TCOBASE=0x0460) iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0) EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal loop: module loaded ns83820.c: National Semiconductor DP83820 10/100/1000 driver. it87: Found IT8718F chip at 0x290, revision 2 it87: in3 is VCC (+5V) coretemp coretemp.0: Using undocumented features, absolute temperature might be wrong! coretemp coretemp.1: Using undocumented features, absolute temperature might be wrong! kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-4, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-6, external journal on dm-8 EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-9, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-10, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Adding 2097144k swap on /dev/mapper/VG01-LVSWAP. Priority:20 extents:1 across:2097144k Adding 2097144k swap on /dev/mapper/VG02-LVSWAP2. Priority:20 extents:1 across:2097144k r8169: eth3: link up NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions process `syslogd' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input3 ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input4 ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB] lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven). ppdev: user-space parallel port driver eth3: no IPv6 routers present Loading iSCSI transport class v2.0-724. iscsi: registered transport (tcp) iscsi: registered transport (iser) netconsole: local port 6665 netconsole: local IP 192.168.64.100 netconsole: interface eth3 netconsole: remote port 25734 netconsole: remote IP 192.168.64.1 netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:11:d8:25:1e:86
Bug#500158: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486: Upgrade from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny may cause a kernel halt
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:45:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:34:07PM +0100, Mark Hobley wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486 Version: 2.6.26-5 Severity: important As Debian is upgraded from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny, the kernel may halt with an error as the system is restarted: Booting the Kernel. BUG Int 6: CR2 EDI c0363f8c ESI 4000 EBP c0363f88 ESP c036f44 EBX EDX 0006 ECX EAX 4000 err EIP c0112b6f CS c0370060 flg 00010092 Stack: c0363f90 c0363f8c c0363f88 c0363f94 c0363f90 c0363f8c c0363f88 c037294f c0363f94 c0375293 03bef000 c03fea40 4000 005a29b7 c000 0009f000 03bef000 00d0 c03ba410 This was observed on an IBM compatible computer using a traditional Intel Pentium compatible processor. This is probably the same as #488022 - can you test that patch to verify? I've prepared a prebuilt image if you'd prefer to test that: http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500158 Mark, did you test the image provided by Dann? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#436260: closed by maximilian attems m...@stro.at (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:13:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:01:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: there was no patch provided nor any proof of any trouble by your side, so tagging with moreinfo and willl close in 10 days unless something substantial comes up. Uh, message 10 of the bug report contains the updated version of gencontrol.py that I provided and I wasn't exactly overburdened with requests for additional information... update for what and what was the error in the first place? it would be great to have that info. 2.6.22 is really old and keeping cruft lying around helps noone. On the other hand, ignoring bugs for the best part of a year and then closing them on the basis that you haven't done anything about them doesn't exactly help either. if you can reproduce it with 2.6.25 or newer snapshots. i'm all ears unless so it is assumed fixed. Mark, does the problem still exist for you with the current Lenny packages? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#438337: Megaraid boot failure
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:03:54PM +1200, Steven Jones wrote: Hi, Unable to install Debian 4.0r3 as there is a lock up during hardware detection, would seem to be around the raid module. Installed 3.1 which went fine, upgraded to 4.0r3 using apt-get update ; apt-get -y dist-upgrade, went fine. Attempted to install a 2.6.18-6 kernel and the megaraid-mbox module enters a 300sec loopso this bug is still outstanding. Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions? If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4? http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.24.html Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#485034: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 02:04:59PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you please try out 2.6.26-rc8, see trunk apt lines http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel Will do, as soon as it creeps into sid. it should have newer ath5k driver. also trying an dhcp setup would be cool. No, DHCP didn't help. However, on the ath5k-users mailing list, Pavel suggested that it might be a WEP issue with my wireless card (AR5211), and it was. When I turned off WEP, I got a good network connection with both a static configuration and with DHCP. I'm thinking that using WPA would be a good workaround for this bug, and would be slightly more secure besides. I haven't had the time to try yet, but I did find [1]. Does this look up to date? 1. http://wiki.debian.org/Manual-Howto#head-6fdd87d329e68a583e5fde32c6b21e460e5541a5 Unless someone else chimes in to the contrary, it appears that this bug could be relabeled as: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network with WEP and AR5211 I'll report back when I've tried 2.6.26 or WPA. Since Lenny now contains images based on 2.6.26, did you have a chance to test them already? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: notfound 504167 in 2.6.26-8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 504167 2.6.26-8 Bug#504167: linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.6.26-8. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: found 504167 in 2.6.26-8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 504167 2.6.26-8 Bug#504167: linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume Bug marked as found in version 2.6.26-8. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make-kpkg and kernel installation problems
I compile my 2.6.25.1 kernel with the following options: $ time fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -rarqos --revision 01 kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source After I try to install it on a second machine I get the following error message: rarqos:~# dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos_01_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos. (Reading database ... 23171 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos (from linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos_01_i386.deb) ... Done. Setting up linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos (01) ... Hmm. There is a symbolic link /lib/modules/2.6.25.1-rarqos/build However, I can not read it: No such file or directory Therefore, I am deleting /lib/modules/2.6.25.1-rarqos/build Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link /lib/modules/2.6.25.1-rarqos/source However, I can not read the target: No such file or directory Therefore, I am deleting /lib/modules/2.6.25.1-rarqos/source Running depmod. --- I don't know where this links came from. I've deleted these links before (on both machines) ... strange - how to get over that problem? greetings tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
