Bug#493863: I can confirm this bug
I hit this bug today, and as per one of the comments it fixed the issue: update-initramfs -k all -u I'm using an i386 system, rather than an AMD64 system. Also there is 2 other bugs reporting the same issue. #511378 #513915 -- Best regards, Duane signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Offre anniversaire
http://www.misterbabel.com/emailing/200902-ajouts-2/message-en.htm?src=eml09ajout Besoin de traduction? MisterBabel.com 100% en ligne, 100% humain Le meilleur rapport Réactivité / Qualité / Prix Toutes vos traductions professionnelles, emails, sites Internet, courriers, plaquettes, ... 94% des traductions déposées en ligne en 2008 on été livrées en moins de 24h Réactivité Traductions professionnelles en ligne 7j/7, 24h/24 Simplicité En ligne, consultable n'importe où, n'importe quand Pas de devis grâce à la carte de traduction prépayée Qualité Tous nos traducteurs sont des professionnels de la traduction Ils sont tous signataires de la CHARTE DE QUALITÉ MisterBabel Profitez de notre offre anniversaire : 10 euros offerts Pour tout achat d'un Pack au choix Votre code promo: 1AN (offre valable pour tout premier achat ou toute recharge, valable jusqu'au 31 mars 2009) L'équipe MisterBabel à votre service au 08 92 70 12 42 (0,34 euros la minute) ou cont...@misterbabel.com Offres non cumulables Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir de messages de la part de MisterBabel, cliquez ici ( http://www.omkg.net/D1/QsdlVk7/QiV85vDqM/Qa0QpVR-K9T.aspx )
Bug#517995: [linux-image-2.6.28-1-686] Intel sound dont work
Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 Version: 2.6.28-1 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, I have this sound card: 0:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Subsystem: Dell Device 0233 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21 Memory at f6adc000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel Using the kernel 2.6.26 the sound work, but using the 2.6.28 the sound dont work, but no errors are showed. The modules are the same, look: [rona...@mobilix ~]$ uname -a Linux mobilix 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Sat Jan 10 18:29:31 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux [rona...@mobilix ~]$ lsmod | grep snd snd_hda_intel 324248 1 snd_pcm_oss 32800 0 snd_mixer_oss 12320 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm 62596 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss snd_seq_dummy 2660 0 snd_seq_oss 24992 0 snd_seq_midi 5728 0 snd_rawmidi 18496 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event 6432 2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi snd_seq 41456 6 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event snd_timer 17800 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 6380 5 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq snd 45604 11 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device soundcore 6368 1 snd snd_page_alloc 7816 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm Now with the 2.6.28 [rona...@mobilix ~]$ uname -a Linux mobilix 2.6.28-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Feb 23 03:13:24 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux [rona...@mobilix ~]$ lsmod | grep snd snd_hda_intel 362712 1 snd_pcm_oss 32128 0 snd_mixer_oss 12256 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm 63332 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss snd_seq_dummy 2628 0 snd_seq_oss 24636 0 snd_seq_midi 5760 0 snd_rawmidi 18784 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event 6368 2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi snd_seq 41576 6 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event snd_timer 17992 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 6412 5 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq snd 45912 11 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device soundcore 6440 1 snd snd_page_alloc 8200 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm Thanks Ronaldo --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-686 Debian Release: 5.0 500 unstable200.97.11.11 500 testing 200.97.11.11 500 stable 200.97.11.11 --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+-= module-init-tools | 3.4-1 initramfs-tools(= 0.55) | 0.92o OR yaird(= 0.0.13) | OR linux-initramfs-tool | -8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8-- Please attach the file: /tmp/reportbug-ng-linux-image-2.6.28-1-686-ABZuGW.txt to the mail. I'd do it myself if the output wasn't too long to handle. Thank you! -8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8-- -- This door is baroquen, please wiggle Handel. (If I wiggle Handel, will it wiggle Bach?) -- Found on a door in the MSU music building -- Prof. Ronaldo Reis Júnior | .''`. UNIMONTES/DBG/Lab. Ecologia Comportamental e Computacional | : :' : Campus Universitário Prof. Darcy Ribeiro, Vila Mauricéia | `. `'` CP: 126, CEP: 39401-089, Montes Claros - MG - Brasil | `- Fone: (38) 3229-8192 | ronaldo.r...@unimontes.br | chrys...@gmail.com | http://www.ppgcb.unimontes.br/lecc | ICQ#: 5692561 | LinuxUser#: 205366 -- Favor NÃO ENVIAR arquivos do Word ou Powerpoint Prefira enviar em PDF, Texto, OpenOffice (ODF), HTML, or RTF. --- Output from package bug script --- ** Version: Linux version 2.6.28-1-686 (Debian 2.6.28-1) (m...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-4) ) #1 SMP Mon Feb 23 03:13:24 UTC 2009 ** Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-1-686 root=UUID=5b22c492-b134-48a0-851d-61fb20d01452 ro vga=792 splash GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= quiet ** Tainted: P (1) ** Kernel log: [5.150872] usb 1-1.1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 [5.183428] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [5.183460] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [5.268960] usb 1-1.1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [5.275105] input: HID 413c:8157 as /devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1:1.0/input/input4 [5.275149] generic-usb 0003:413C:8157.0004: input,hidraw3: USB HID v1.11 Keyboard [HID 413c:8157] on usb-:00:1a.0-1.1/input0 [5.275234] usb 1-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=413c,
Offre anniversaire
http://www.misterbabel.com/emailing/200902-ajouts-2/message-en.htm?src=eml09ajout Besoin de traduction? MisterBabel.com 100% en ligne, 100% humain Le meilleur rapport Réactivité / Qualité / Prix Toutes vos traductions professionnelles, emails, sites Internet, courriers, plaquettes, ... 94% des traductions déposées en ligne en 2008 on été livrées en moins de 24h Réactivité Traductions professionnelles en ligne 7j/7, 24h/24 Simplicité En ligne, consultable n'importe où, n'importe quand Pas de devis grâce à la carte de traduction prépayée Qualité Tous nos traducteurs sont des professionnels de la traduction Ils sont tous signataires de la CHARTE DE QUALITÉ MisterBabel Profitez de notre offre anniversaire : 10 euros offerts Pour tout achat d'un Pack au choix Votre code promo: 1AN (offre valable pour tout premier achat ou toute recharge, valable jusqu'au 31 mars 2009) L'équipe MisterBabel à votre service au 08 92 70 12 42 (0,34 euros la minute) ou cont...@misterbabel.com Offres non cumulables Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir de messages de la part de MisterBabel, cliquez ici ( http://www.omkg.net/D1/QsdlVk7/QiV85vDqM/Qa0QpVR-K9T.aspx )
Bug#517865: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel fail to boot after upgrade to lenny
[ keep bugreport on Cc, not private communication, thanks ] On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:33:05AM +0100, Philippe Amelant wrote: Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 18:40 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 05:22:27PM +0100, Philippe Amelant wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: important Kernel fail to boot after upgrade to lenny. 2.6.18 from etch still working. it be cool if you posted the error message? Hi yes I know but the problem is I just don't have error message. I suppose I should connect a console to get all the boot message. I'll try do do this but it's 2 productions servers so it's not so easy. The server hang after disk detection (1 LSI Raid 1 array). I have a message about sd driver mut be updated but I saw on kernel traffic this error is a false warning. Regards well without error message this report is useless. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517473: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 fails to boot, no /dev/md0, no /dev/sd[ab]*)
Your message dated Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:12:00 +0100 with message-id 20090302221200.gc29...@stro.at and subject line Re: Bug#517473: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 fails to boot, no /dev/md0, no /dev/sd[ab]* has caused the Debian Bug report #517473, regarding linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 fails to boot, no /dev/md0, no /dev/sd[ab]* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 517473: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517473 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 Version: 2.6.28-1 Severity: important New 2.6.28 fails to boot as it finds no md0 (for root dev). mdadm complains it is unable to assemble it. With the provided shell it is clear sd[ab]* devices are missing at the point of boot sequence. OTOH, /sys/bus/scsi/ shows the SCSI controller (aic79xx) and the two disks. mdadm.conf in the initrd.img has the /dev/ paths and UUIDs to identify the md devices, fstab uses /dev/md0 though. 2.6.26 boots fine. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.25 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.93 tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.4-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.9-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 suggests: ii grub 0.97-47lenny2 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v ii linux-doc-2.6.28 2.6.28-1 Linux kernel specific documentatio -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.28-1-686: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.28-1-686: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.28-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.28-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.28-1-686: true shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.28-1-686: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.28-1-686: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.28-1-686: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.28-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.28-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.28-1-686: ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, GSR wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686 Version: 2.6.28-1 Severity: important New 2.6.28 fails to boot as it finds no md0 (for root dev). mdadm complains it is unable to assemble it. With the provided shell it is clear sd[ab]* devices are missing at the point of boot sequence. OTOH, /sys/bus/scsi/ shows the SCSI controller (aic79xx) and the two disks. mdadm.conf in the initrd.img has the /dev/ paths and UUIDs to identify the md devices, fstab uses /dev/md0 though. 2.6.26 boots fine. use rootdelay=X bootparam. ---End Message---
Bug#517865: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel fail to boot after upgrade to lenny
So what can I do ? well without error message this report is useless. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: mkinitramfs - Label not honored in /etc/fstat
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Peter Pranter wrote:
Dear ladies and gentlemen!
Please insert the following 4 lines after line 229 into hook-funktions
(mkinitramfs-tools) to honour a label in /etc/fstab:
if [ -z ${root} ]; then
eval $(mount | awk '$1 ~ /=/ {if ($3 == /)
{split($1,a,=); print root= a[2] \nFSTYPE= $5; exit}}')
if [ -n ${root} ]; then
root=/dev/disk/by-label/${root}; fi
fi
Tested on Debian (Release 5.0)
what are you trying to do?
a proper bug report against initramfs-tools might be appropriate.
kind regards
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64 is _huuuuge_
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Miles Bader wrote: Miles Bader mi...@gnu.org writes: Previous debian kernel packages were kind of big but the recent packaging of 2.6.28 is _much_ bigger -- Something very suspicious about those sizes too: the size of the .debs for those versions is actually more or less the same, seeming to only reflect the sort of natural growth you'd expect with the version bump: A bit more poking around, and the problem seems to the that the __this_module symbol in each kernel module has suddenly grown from about 4KB to about 64KB. Is this a bug...? $ size /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko textdata bss dec hex filename 171445600 0 2274458d8 /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko $ size /lib/modules/2.6.28-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko textdata bss dec hex filename 18216 66896 0 85112 14c78 /lib/modules/2.6.28-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko $ readelf -s /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko|grep _this_module 102: 4736 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 23 __this_module $ readelf -s /lib/modules/2.6.28-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.ko|grep _this_module 101: 66048 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 23 __this_module this is fixed for 2.6.29, as we won't release with 2.6.28 not worth more speculations. it poped up due to: /boot/config-2.6.27-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32 /boot/config-2.6.28-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=512 -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517865: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel fail to boot after upgrade to lenny
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 02:24:41PM +0100, Philippe Amelant wrote: So what can I do ? well without error message this report is useless. use rootdelay=12 to shorten time to see if the trouble is initramfs and then check which devices are there, post the corresponding dmesg the error messages! that might be a good start :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Life - Un salto nella tua filiera
To view the message, please use an HTML compatible email viewer!
Re: [Lenny] linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz-amd64 kernel panic on boot
Hi Cedric A corrected kernel has been built and is available in the following URL. Can you verify that this kernel fixes your problem? http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/ Best regards, // Ola On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:21:35AM +0100, Cedric Jeanneret wrote: not a big bug ? ermm system can't boot... if that's not a grave bug... we'll use the old deprecated fza-kernel until the new patched kernel is out... Regards, C. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:58:15 +0100 Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: Hi Cedric There are two answers for that question: 1) The patch seems to be a potential ABI breaker. I do not say it is an ABI breaker, but it needs some analysis before telling that. ABI breakers has not been allowed for a quite long time during the lenny freeze period. 2) It has not been a grave bug and lenny has been in a freeze period. However this bug is a good candidate for the next release update of lenny. Best regards, // Ola Quoting Cedric Jeanneret cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com: Hi again, After some poking arround, my bug is exactly this one : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500876 I just tried to boot the server with maxcpus=4, and all works... Now the question is : why is the patch provided in this bug NOT applied to lenny stable kernel ?? Regards, C. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:22:19 +0100 Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: Hi Cedric Please take contact with Kir Kolyshkin k...@openvz.org. He know which designer to contact about this issue. Best regards, // Ola Quoting Cedric Jeanneret cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com: Yup, at every boot... How can I have the full hangup log ? what can I provide to help? as this server is emtpy for now (but not for long..), I can reboot it several times. I can use it today. Regards, C. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:54:12 +0100 Ola Lundqvist o...@inguza.com wrote: Hi again The problem with the previous bug report was that it was hard to reproduce reliably. Your help may be helpful in this regard as I understand that you have problem every time. Is that correct? Best regards, // Ola On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:47:28AM +0100, Cedric Jeanneret wrote: Thanks a lot. I'll follow this bug on openvz. Regards C. On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:53:09 +0100 Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org wrote: Hi Cedric This bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=930 Unfortunatly the solution is not yet known. Best regards, // Ola On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Cedric Jeanneret wrote: Hello, I just installed lenny on a new server (dell poweredge 2950) and wanted to use the debian openvz kernel... Unfortunately, I'm just unable to boot the server on it. Poking on google, I found someone with exactly the same problem: http://fixunix.com/debian/548482-bug-503097-linux-image-2-6-26-1-openvz-amd64-kernel-panic.html As nobody answer to him, I'm trying to find some things in here. FYI, openvz.org kernel runs nicely (ovzkernel-2.6.18-amd64-smp), but as it's a bit old... we really want to use debian's packages... Thanks in advance. C. -- Cédric Jeanneret | System Administrator 021 619 10 32| Camptocamp SA cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com | PSE-A / EPFL -- Cédric Jeanneret | System Administrator 021 619 10 32| Camptocamp SA cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com | PSE-A / EPFL -- Cédric Jeanneret | System Administrator 021 619 10 32| Camptocamp SA cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com | PSE-A / EPFL -- Cédric Jeanneret | System Administrator 021 619 10 32| Camptocamp SA cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com | PSE-A / EPFL -- Cédric Jeanneret | System Administrator 021 619 10 32| Camptocamp SA cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com | PSE-A / EPFL -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Bug#517193: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64 fails to boot on amd64
Hello, I can confirm this bug. 2.6.28-1-amd64 hangs just after Booting the kernel. with a blinking cursor as does a compiled 2.6.28 with mith my .config even with a very minimalistic config it does hang at the same point. 2.6.26 with my .config and 2.6.26-1-amd64 does fine. -- Pol Bettinger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518046: [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] report_bad_irq (while in screensaver)
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- recently, ever time i get back to the computer which is in screensaver mode and i get this error in the /var/log/messages : kernel: [12466.291495] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.26-1- amd64 #1 kernel: [12466.291495] kernel: [12466.291495] Call Trace: kernel: [12466.291495] IRQ [8026c6c3] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x72 kernel: [12466.291495] [8026c902] note_interrupt+0x1fd/0x23b kernel: [12466.291495] [8026d18b] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa5/0xc8 kernel: [12466.291495] [8020f5e4] do_IRQ+0x6d/0xd9 kernel: [12466.291495] [8020c46d] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x19 kernel: [12466.291495] EOI [a006e26d] :processor:acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2b3/0x327 kernel: [12466.291495] [803aa0e4] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7a/0xb2 kernel: [12466.291495] [803aa06a] cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0xb2 kernel: [12466.291495] [8020ac79] cpu_idle+0x89/0xb3 kernel: [12466.291495] system seems functional but maybe i am missing something ? --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 Debian Release: 5.0 500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 500 unstablesnapshots.ekiga.net 500 unstablemirror.isoc.org.il 500 stable security.debian.org 1 experimentalmirror.isoc.org.il --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+-= module-init-tools | 3.4-1 initramfs-tools(= 0.55) | 0.93 OR yaird(= 0.0.13) | OR linux-initramfs-tool | --- Output from package bug script --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#500876: fix for 500876
Hi Dann
The openvz 686 version is now regression tested. I have also asked the
person that had the problem with this bug to verify the amd64 kernel as well.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:36:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:54:09PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Looks very similar to the patch I proposed. Here it is.
I was not aware you could add more files so I appended to the
end of the file.
Ah - yeah, in fact we _must_ have separate files. That gives us the
ability to generate older versions of the source tree from the
latest. Of course, that doesn't work so well for the features
patches, since they sometimes have to be regen'd to apply.
When you have different files like this, which order will it take
them?
That is determined by the series file. At application, the build
system parses the series file (using the changelog to determine
order), and applys all of the normal patches (series files that don't
end in -extra), followed by all of the -extra patches.
I guess the only thing remaining is to verify that this patch works
well and risk of regression is low - do you have a system (or systems)
you can use to test the builds here?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:31:36AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:49:05AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Quoting dann frazier da...@dannf.org:
hey Ola,
Attached is a patch I have queued for lenny.
I've posted builds w/ this fix here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Oh, thanks a lot.
Would you be able to review the patch/test the build to confirm that
its ok for a stable update? Note that it doesn't change the ABI.
Good to know that it does not change the ABI. I was just about to send
you
a mail with my own work regarding this issue. My machine is currently
building a package with this patch.
Do you have a diff file on what you did? If not I'll send mine later
today.
The patch applied fine and seems to build on 686 arch at least.
Best regards,
// Ola
oops - forgot to attach it
Index: debian/patches/series/14-extra
===
--- debian/patches/series/14-extra(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/series/14-extra(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
++ features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
featureset=openvz
Index:
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
===
--- debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+From: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:57:48 + (+0400)
+Subject: fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+X-Git-Tag: sync-2.6.27-15.10.08~5
+X-Git-Url:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commitdiff_plain;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af
+
+fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+
+after commit b3242151 struct percpu_data dynamically allocated
+and have array only for 1 cpu, so static usage of it does not work.
+
+Plus rework macros for static percpu variables declaration and
initialization.
+
+http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039
+
+Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov xe...@openvz.org
+---
+
+diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
+index 5ac97e1..e159f4d 100644
+--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
b/include/linux/percpu.h
+@@ -74,11 +74,20 @@ struct percpu_data {
+ (__typeof__(ptr))__p-ptrs[(cpu)];\
+ })
+
+-#define static_percpu_ptr(sptr, sptrs) ({ \
++struct percpu_data_static {
++void *ptrs[NR_CPUS];
++};
++
++#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_STATIC(type, name) \
++static struct percpu_data_static per_cpu_data__##name; \
++static __typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name[NR_CPUS]
++
++#define percpu_static_init(name) ({ \
+ int i; \
+ for (i = 0; i NR_CPUS; i++) \
+-(sptr)-ptrs[i] = (sptrs)[i]; \
+-(__typeof__(sptrs[0]))__percpu_disguise(sptr);\
++(per_cpu_data__##name).ptrs[i] =
(per_cpu__##name)[i];\
++(__typeof__((per_cpu__##name)[0])) \
++__percpu_disguise((per_cpu_data__##name));\
+ })
+
+ extern void *percpu_populate(void *__pdata, size_t size, gfp_t
Re: lenny updates
Hi Dann You asked about the latest status and here it is. Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the kernel. I'll prepare a patch and regression test that version for you. #510787: Refers to an other bug report that was not openvz specific. Should it be forwarded to an non-openvz version of the kernel or kept here? In any case I have added latest information to the report and told where the problem has been forwarded. #511165: Patch exist for 2.6.24 and 2.6.26. Fix is available in http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=b5e1f74cee5bc2c45bdca53a7218fb8de89215dd Not sure if this is an ABI breaker. #500876: Fix available in: http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af Problem is about to be verified. Regression tested without problems seen. #503097: Reported as http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=930 Seems to be a duplicate of #500876 above. #505174: This is a request to go up to the latest version that includes fixes for all the ones in this mail that describe that there is a fix available. Unfortunatly there are ABI breakers... #508773: Patch available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1054 Fix in http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.24-openvz;a=commit;h=20bd90762d4df4a3c7c247b660c696bdd0a27709 Do not look like an ABI breaker to me. #500145: Forwarded to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 Marked as dupliate of http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1067 Not solved yet. #501985: From: maximilian attems the upstream nfs fixes are abi breakers and thus can't be integrated at this point they will be for the first point release were abi breaking will be allowed again. #494445: There are a number of problems in this area. Fixes are available. However some of them are ABI breakers. #500645: Fix available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034 http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=6d18ba377cfa3e86ee830fe6a5fce52b8fd51039 I can not see that this is an ABI breaker, so it should be possibly to apply this one without problem. Best regards, // Ola On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:47:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: hey, The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to start coordinating the kernel update. Security The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on security issues, so I'd like to release a DSA later this week. I'd appreciate it if the individual arch maintainers could test builds from this branch ahead of time. The CVE-2009-0029 touch a lot of arch-specific code and though they applied pretty easily to the lenny kernel, it'd still be good to get some testing there. I noticed that the snapshot archive now has a lenny-security dist for some archs (thanks waldi) Stable -- There are several fixes queued up for a stable upload. I have a few more small fixes from jmm to review/commit as well, and it looks like tbm has an RTC regression fix pending. I've seen mentions of OpenVZ fixes from Ola/maks - what is the status of those? Are there any other changes people are working on? ABI changes --- The security fixes don't currently break the ABI. It sounds like the openvz fixes are ABI-breaking?. If it is going to be ready for this update and does break the ABI, I'd also like to get the hppa large-module fix in. And, of course, we'll need to notify the d-i team of this change. -- dann frazier -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#500876: fix for 500876
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
The openvz 686 version is now regression tested. I have also asked the
person that had the problem with this bug to verify the amd64 kernel as well.
Best regards,
Thanks!
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:36:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:54:09PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Looks very similar to the patch I proposed. Here it is.
I was not aware you could add more files so I appended to the
end of the file.
Ah - yeah, in fact we _must_ have separate files. That gives us the
ability to generate older versions of the source tree from the
latest. Of course, that doesn't work so well for the features
patches, since they sometimes have to be regen'd to apply.
When you have different files like this, which order will it take
them?
That is determined by the series file. At application, the build
system parses the series file (using the changelog to determine
order), and applys all of the normal patches (series files that don't
end in -extra), followed by all of the -extra patches.
I guess the only thing remaining is to verify that this patch works
well and risk of regression is low - do you have a system (or systems)
you can use to test the builds here?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:31:36AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:49:05AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Quoting dann frazier da...@dannf.org:
hey Ola,
Attached is a patch I have queued for lenny.
I've posted builds w/ this fix here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Oh, thanks a lot.
Would you be able to review the patch/test the build to confirm that
its ok for a stable update? Note that it doesn't change the ABI.
Good to know that it does not change the ABI. I was just about to
send you
a mail with my own work regarding this issue. My machine is currently
building a package with this patch.
Do you have a diff file on what you did? If not I'll send mine later
today.
The patch applied fine and seems to build on 686 arch at least.
Best regards,
// Ola
oops - forgot to attach it
Index: debian/patches/series/14-extra
===
--- debian/patches/series/14-extra (revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/series/14-extra (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
++ features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
featureset=openvz
Index:
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
===
---
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
+++
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+From: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:57:48 + (+0400)
+Subject: fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+X-Git-Tag: sync-2.6.27-15.10.08~5
+X-Git-Url:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commitdiff_plain;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af
+
+fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+
+after commit b3242151 struct percpu_data dynamically allocated
+and have array only for 1 cpu, so static usage of it does not work.
+
+Plus rework macros for static percpu variables declaration and
initialization.
+
+http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039
+
+Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov xe...@openvz.org
+---
+
+diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
+index 5ac97e1..e159f4d 100644
+--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
b/include/linux/percpu.h
+@@ -74,11 +74,20 @@ struct percpu_data {
+ (__typeof__(ptr))__p-ptrs[(cpu)]; \
+ })
+
+-#define static_percpu_ptr(sptr, sptrs) ({ \
++struct percpu_data_static {
++ void *ptrs[NR_CPUS];
++};
++
++#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_STATIC(type, name) \
++ static struct percpu_data_static per_cpu_data__##name; \
++ static __typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name[NR_CPUS]
++
++#define percpu_static_init(name) ({ \
+ int i; \
+ for (i = 0; i NR_CPUS; i++) \
+- (sptr)-ptrs[i] = (sptrs)[i]; \
+- (__typeof__(sptrs[0]))__percpu_disguise(sptr);\
++ (per_cpu_data__##name).ptrs[i] =
(per_cpu__##name)[i];\
++
Bug#518053: [virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686] Kernel module does not fit to virtualbox version
Package: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26+1.6.6-dfsg-6 Severity: important Hi, the version of virtualbox (virtualbox-ose) changed from 1.6.6 (lenny) to 2.1.4. If I start a virtual machine in virtualbox I get the error: ### The version of the VirtualBox kernel modules and the version of VirtualBox application are not matching. You can correct this by either installing the correct virtualbox-ose-modules package (if available) through apt-get or by building it manually with: module-assistant auto-install virtualbox-ose (VERR_VM_DRIVER_VERSION_MISMATCH). ### Thus, the kernel modules must be rebuild. I wonder if it is possible to prevent virtualbox from entering testing if there is not appropriate kernel module. Or is rebuilding with module-assistant auto-install virtualbox-ose the way to to it? Kind regards from Martin --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian Release: 5.0 900 testing ftp2.de.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+-=== linux-modules-2.6.26-1-686| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518077: linux-libc-dev failing to install because of file conflict with ivtv0.9-utils
Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 apt-get install linux-libc-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: linux-libc-dev 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 453 not upgraded. 38 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/817kB of archives. After this operation, 352kB of additional disk space will be used. Setting up debconf-english (1.5.26) ... (Reading database ... 1573088 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.26-13 (using .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/linux/ivtv.h', which is also in package ivtv0.9-utils dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb [ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.2 ] File updated: searched for 152 files, found 136 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmtteMACgkQ2/alund99IcftgCgmBr+YiSotW3p0ncSO7B71ZS+ t9sAnj0+40kuAHkosfMUsKZUAyBApSLl =mXp4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 517181
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2 tags 517181 + pending Bug#517181: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: bnx2 driver not shipped There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518077: marked as done (linux-libc-dev failing to install because of file conflict with ivtv0.9-utils)
Your message dated Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:48:00 -0800 with message-id 20090303234800.ga8...@dario.dodds.net and subject line Re: Bug#518077: linux-libc-dev failing to install because of file conflict with ivtv0.9-utils has caused the Debian Bug report #518077, regarding linux-libc-dev failing to install because of file conflict with ivtv0.9-utils to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 apt-get install linux-libc-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: linux-libc-dev 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 453 not upgraded. 38 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/817kB of archives. After this operation, 352kB of additional disk space will be used. Setting up debconf-english (1.5.26) ... (Reading database ... 1573088 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.26-13 (using .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/linux/ivtv.h', which is also in package ivtv0.9-utils dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb [ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.2 ] File updated: searched for 152 files, found 136 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmtteMACgkQ2/alund99IcftgCgmBr+YiSotW3p0ncSO7B71ZS+ t9sAnj0+40kuAHkosfMUsKZUAyBApSLl =mXp4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:57:47PM -0500, Brian Minton wrote: Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: normal apt-get install linux-libc-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: linux-libc-dev 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 453 not upgraded. 38 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/817kB of archives. After this operation, 352kB of additional disk space will be used. Setting up debconf-english (1.5.26) ... (Reading database ... 1573088 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.26-13 (using .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/linux/ivtv.h', which is also in package ivtv0.9-utils dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_i386.deb [ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.2 ] File updated: searched for 152 files, found 136 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) There is no package named ivtv0.9-utils in Debian. You should remove this local package to complete your upgrade, or else force a file overwrite. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org ---End Message---
Bug#517193: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64 fails to boot on amd64
Can you confirm whether this boot failure matches the bug filed upstream as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12520? That bug has not yet been fixed in a stable release but is believed to be fixed in Linux 2.6.29. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#518077: linux-libc-dev failing to install because of file conflict with ivtv0.9-utils
Thanks, that did the trick. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#500876: fix for 500876
Hello!
unfortunately, I can't test it anymore... finally we put an alienized kernel
downloaded directly from openvz.org. We couldn't wait, as our servers are
really overprovisionned... And I don't known when we'll be able to buy another
server :/
Maybe someone else vith a bi-quad can test it?
Thanks for your time patching the kernel anyway. If it works, we'll use it on
new servers [when we'll buy them... someday -.-]
Regards,
C.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:43:56 -0700
dann frazier da...@dannf.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
The openvz 686 version is now regression tested. I have also asked the
person that had the problem with this bug to verify the amd64 kernel as
well.
Best regards,
Thanks!
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:36:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:54:09PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Looks very similar to the patch I proposed. Here it is.
I was not aware you could add more files so I appended to the
end of the file.
Ah - yeah, in fact we _must_ have separate files. That gives us the
ability to generate older versions of the source tree from the
latest. Of course, that doesn't work so well for the features
patches, since they sometimes have to be regen'd to apply.
When you have different files like this, which order will it take
them?
That is determined by the series file. At application, the build
system parses the series file (using the changelog to determine
order), and applys all of the normal patches (series files that don't
end in -extra), followed by all of the -extra patches.
I guess the only thing remaining is to verify that this patch works
well and risk of regression is low - do you have a system (or systems)
you can use to test the builds here?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:31:36AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:49:05AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Dann
Quoting dann frazier da...@dannf.org:
hey Ola,
Attached is a patch I have queued for lenny.
I've posted builds w/ this fix here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500876/
Oh, thanks a lot.
Would you be able to review the patch/test the build to confirm
that
its ok for a stable update? Note that it doesn't change the ABI.
Good to know that it does not change the ABI. I was just about to
send you
a mail with my own work regarding this issue. My machine is
currently
building a package with this patch.
Do you have a diff file on what you did? If not I'll send mine
later today.
The patch applied fine and seems to build on 686 arch at least.
Best regards,
// Ola
oops - forgot to attach it
Index: debian/patches/series/14-extra
===
--- debian/patches/series/14-extra(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/series/14-extra(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
++ features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
featureset=openvz
Index:
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
===
---
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
+++
debian/patches/features/all/openvz/fix-wrong-size-of-ub0_percpu.patch
(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+From: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:57:48 + (+0400)
+Subject: fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+X-Git-Tag: sync-2.6.27-15.10.08~5
+X-Git-Url:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commitdiff_plain;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af
+
+fix wrong size of ub0_percpu.
+
+after commit b3242151 struct percpu_data dynamically allocated
+and have array only for 1 cpu, so static usage of it does not work.
+
+Plus rework macros for static percpu variables declaration and
initialization.
+
+http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039
+
+Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org
+Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov xe...@openvz.org
+---
+
+diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
+index 5ac97e1..e159f4d 100644
+--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
b/include/linux/percpu.h
+@@ -74,11 +74,20 @@ struct percpu_data {
+ (__typeof__(ptr))__p-ptrs[(cpu)];\
+ })
+
+-#define static_percpu_ptr(sptr, sptrs) ({ \
++struct percpu_data_static {
++void
