Processing of firmware-nonfree_0.14+lenny1_ia64.changes

2009-03-29 Thread Archive Administrator
firmware-nonfree_0.14+lenny1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  firmware-nonfree_0.14+lenny1.dsc
  firmware-nonfree_0.14+lenny1.tar.gz
  firmware-bnx2_0.14+lenny1_all.deb
  firmware-ipw2x00_0.14+lenny1_all.deb
  firmware-iwlwifi_0.14+lenny1_all.deb
  firmware-qlogic_0.14+lenny1_all.deb
  firmware-ralink_0.14+lenny1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#416063: tagging 416063

2009-03-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:11:52AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:19:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> > > tags 416063 - patch
> > 
> > Would you mind explaining?
> > 
> > The patch solves two issues:
> > - inconsistency between documentation and behaviour:
> >  You can read the following in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:
> >  # most - Add all framebuffer, acpi, filesystem, and harddrive drivers.
> >  As it happens, most does *not* add all framebuffer drivers
> 
> yeah none at all, fixed in latest git.
> the patch was not ok as we don't want to have another hardcoded list
> to maintain, just added all the fb modules on one go, see
> 
> f40e826287d2776094f48302c196652f2ba8326b
>   hook-functions: MODULES=most add all fb modules per default
> http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary
> 
> > - workaround the lack of dependency on intel_agp for intelfb.
> >  Without the workaround, you can't have intel_agp loaded before
> >  intelfb without *not* using video=intelfb syntax, thus losing
> >  /dev/fb device creation.
> 
> that looks more like a kernel bug,
> also intelfb should just work fine if not on agp.
> or are you saying there are missing symbols there?

This is what happens in intelfb_pci_register, unconditionally:

/* Use agpgart to manage the GATT */
if (!(bridge = agp_backend_acquire(pdev))) {
ERR_MSG("cannot acquire agp\n");
cleanup(dinfo);
return -ENODEV;
}

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521712: Confirmation

2009-03-29 Thread Don Pellegrino
I can confirm that /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86:41
makes references to a non-existent Makefile_32.cpu.  I bumped into this
problem while attempting to build the fglrx module (ATI Closed Graphcs
Driver).




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#431500: please include pata_jmicron

2009-03-29 Thread Ralph A. Smith
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-13lenny2

There are still problems with the old jmicron IDE driver 
(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_JMICRON) in the current Lenny kernel listed above.
I have a CD-writer on a Gigabyte board which uses the
JMicron 20360/20363 for the IDE channel.
The driver generates bursts of messages of these sorts every few seconds:

 hda: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
 hda: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
 hda: status error: error=0x44 { AbortedCommand LastFailedSense=0x04 }

Symptoms appear after a variable post-boot interval, whether or not
a disk has been inserted in the drive.

Rebuilding the same kernel (from Debian sources) with a config file
set to generate pata_jmicron, and then loading that module instead of jmicron,
seems to fix the problems.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#416063: tagging 416063

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:19:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> > tags 416063 - patch
> 
> Would you mind explaining?
> 
> The patch solves two issues:
> - inconsistency between documentation and behaviour:
>  You can read the following in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:
>  # most - Add all framebuffer, acpi, filesystem, and harddrive drivers.
>  As it happens, most does *not* add all framebuffer drivers

yeah none at all, fixed in latest git.
the patch was not ok as we don't want to have another hardcoded list
to maintain, just added all the fb modules on one go, see

f40e826287d2776094f48302c196652f2ba8326b
  hook-functions: MODULES=most add all fb modules per default
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary

> - workaround the lack of dependency on intel_agp for intelfb.
>  Without the workaround, you can't have intel_agp loaded before
>  intelfb without *not* using video=intelfb syntax, thus losing
>  /dev/fb device creation.

that looks more like a kernel bug,
also intelfb should just work fine if not on agp.
or are you saying there are missing symbols there?

still it leaves the question if and how the agp modules
should land on initramfs.
cc'ing fb expert. 

thanks for pinging on that

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 493863

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 493863 pending
Bug#493863: update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for newest kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#492571: marked as done (hook-functions: manual_add_modules(): doesn't work with mawk)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:57:08 +0200
with message-id <20090329225708.gf27...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: hook-functions: manual_add_modules(): doesn't work with 
mawk
has caused the Debian Bug report #492571,
regarding hook-functions: manual_add_modules(): doesn't work with mawk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92e
Severity: important


See manual_add_modules() in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions:

awk '/^insmod/ { print $2 }'

That line works as expected when your awk is `gawk`, but produces no output
with `mawk`. This leaves the system unbootable (in my case) because none of
the kernel drivers are copied to the ramfs image. Easy workaround is to
replace it with this:

grep '^insmod' | sed -r '/insmod\s+//'

-- Package-specific info:
-- /proc/cmdline
root=UUID=5c884208-2607-40e2-b304-33e971c3b6b0 ro 

-- /proc/filesystems
cramfs
xfs
fuseblk

-- lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
xt_tcpudp   7808  1 
iptable_filter  7552  1 
ip_tables  24680  1 iptable_filter
x_tables   24712  2 xt_tcpudp,ip_tables
video  23440  0 
button 13472  0 
ac 10376  0 
battery15496  0 
ipv6  296840  8 
fuse   50608  1 
dm_snapshot21704  0 
dm_mirror  26240  0 
dm_mod 64112  2 dm_snapshot,dm_mirror
loop   23044  0 
pcmcia 45976  0 
firmware_class 15360  1 pcmcia
joydev 15616  0 
wlan_scan_sta  18176  0 
ath_rate_sample17152  1 
snd_hda_intel 311968  2 
snd_pcm_oss48288  0 
snd_mixer_oss  21376  1 snd_pcm_oss
tifm_7xx1  12672  0 
snd_pcm89992  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss
tifm_core  16264  1 tifm_7xx1
ath_pci99632  0 
snd_timer  28424  1 snd_pcm
yenta_socket   31756  1 
rsrc_nonstatic 16128  1 yenta_socket
pcmcia_core46628  3 pcmcia,yenta_socket,rsrc_nonstatic
wlan  206496  4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_rate_sample,ath_pci
ath_hal   222576  3 ath_rate_sample,ath_pci
i2c_nforce210624  0 
snd65896  9 
snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore  13088  1 snd
psmouse45468  0 
pcspkr  7680  0 
snd_page_alloc 15376  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
i2c_core   31488  1 i2c_nforce2
k8temp 10496  0 
serio_raw  11780  0 
tsdev  13312  0 
evdev  15232  5 
xfs   497864  1 
ide_cd 44832  0 
cdrom  39848  1 ide_cd
usbhid 32704  0 
hid31360  1 usbhid
amd74xx19888  0 [permanent]
generic10372  0 [permanent]
ide_core  147728  3 ide_cd,amd74xx,generic
ata_generic13188  0 
forcedeth  52872  0 
ehci_hcd   37900  0 
ohci_hcd   25860  0 
thermal19600  0 
processor  39912  1 thermal
fan 9992  1 
sata_nv25860  2 
libata132528  2 ata_generic,sata_nv
sd_mod 33280  3 
scsi_mod  164536  2 libata,sd_mod

-- /etc/kernel-img.conf
# Kernel image management overrides
# See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
do_symlinks = yes
relative_links = yes
do_bootloader = yes
do_bootfloppy = no
do_initrd = yes
link_in_boot = no

-- /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
MODULES=most
BUSYBOX=y
KEYMAP=n
BOOT=local
DEVICE=eth0
NFSROOT=auto


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  cpio  2.9-13 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  findutils 4.4.0-2utilities for finding files--find,
ii  klibc-utils   1.5.11-3   small utilities built with klibc f
ii  module-init-tools 3.4-1  tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  udev  0

Processed: tagging 427509

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 427509 pending
Bug#427509: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs uses /boot/grub/menu.lst but 
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#521761: initramfs-tools: resume from hibernate fails with encrypted swap

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 521761 cryptsetup
Bug#521761: initramfs-tools: resume from hibernate fails with encrypted swap
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `cryptsetup'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521761: initramfs-tools: resume from hibernate fails with encrypted swap

2009-03-29 Thread Moy Easwaran
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: important


I used the standard installation settings for encrypted partitions
(/, /home, and swap), but resuming from hiberation fails.  I'm sorry I
can't spare time to flesh out the following patch, but I hope it'll
give someone an idea of where to look.  This worked for me.  I don't
use LVM and my swap partition is of course /dev/sda5.  This is in the
mountroot function right after root has been mounted.

# diff initrd.orig/scripts/local initrd/scripts/local
104a105,111
> ##
> # MY RESUME:
> log_begin_msg "MY_RESUME"
> cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sda5 sda5_crypt
> log_end_msg
> ##
>


-- Package-specific info:
-- /proc/cmdline
resume=/dev/mapper/sda5_crypt root=/dev/mapper/sda6_crypt ro vga=792

-- /proc/filesystems
ext3
fuseblk

-- lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
i915   26112  1 
drm66184  2 i915
michael_mic 3072  4 
arc42592  4 
ecb 3392  4 
ip6table_filter 3200  0 
ip6_tables 12144  1 ip6table_filter
ipv6  235876  14 
nf_conntrack_ipv4  13036  1 
xt_state2784  1 
nf_conntrack   56276  2 nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state
iptable_filter  3392  1 
ip_tables  10928  1 iptable_filter
x_tables   14052  3 ip6_tables,xt_state,ip_tables
fuse   43676  1 
loop   13516  0 
joydev  9248  0 
snd_hda_intel 325112  1 
snd_pcm_oss33568  0 
snd_mixer_oss  13088  1 snd_pcm_oss
snd_pcm63396  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss
snd_seq_dummy   3428  0 
snd_seq_oss25760  0 
snd_seq_midi6496  0 
snd_rawmidi19264  1 snd_seq_midi
snd_seq_midi_event  7200  2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi
snd_seq42224  6 
snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event
snd_timer  18568  2 snd_pcm,snd_seq
snd_seq_device  7148  5 
snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq
snd46372  11 
snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device
uvcvideo   46536  0 
pcspkr  3200  0 
compat_ioctl32  2080  1 uvcvideo
serio_raw   5508  0 
videodev   28288  1 uvcvideo
soundcore   7136  1 snd
i2c_i8018688  0 
v4l1_compat13028  2 uvcvideo,videodev
ieee80211_crypt_tkip 8832  0 
psmouse33104  0 
i2c_core   20596  1 i2c_i801
snd_page_alloc  8648  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
wl   1476424  0 
ieee80211_crypt 5892  2 ieee80211_crypt_tkip,wl
video  17200  0 
output  3680  1 video
wmi 7208  0 
ac  4964  0 
battery10948  0 
button  6864  0 
intel_agp  23268  1 
agpgart29576  3 drm,intel_agp
evdev   8768  10 
ext3  106280  3 
jbd40212  1 ext3
mbcache 7876  1 ext3
sha256_generic 12128  0 
aes_i5868512  6 
aes_generic30024  1 aes_i586
cbc 4032  3 
dm_crypt   11940  1 
dm_mod 46952  7 dm_crypt
crypto_blkcipher   16004  6 ecb,cbc,dm_crypt
sg 27732  0 
sr_mod 14084  0 
cdrom  30944  1 sr_mod
sd_mod 22968  5 
usb_storage76864  0 
ahci   24428  4 
libata141248  1 ahci
scsi_mod  130124  5 sg,sr_mod,sd_mod,usb_storage,libata
dock9072  1 libata
uhci_hcd   19504  0 
ehci_hcd   29420  0 
r8169  24612  0 
usbcore   119184  5 uvcvideo,usb_storage,uhci_hcd,ehci_hcd
thermal15996  0 
processor  33536  3 thermal
fan 4932  0 
thermal_sys11624  4 video,thermal,processor,fan

-- /etc/kernel-img.conf
# Kernel image management overrides
# See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
do_symlinks = yes
relative_links = yes
do_bootloader = no
do_bootfloppy = no
do_initrd = yes
link_in_boot = no
postinst_hook = update-grub
postrm_hook   = update-grub

-- /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
MODULES=most
BUSYBOX=y
KEYMAP=n
BOOT=local
DEVICE=eth0
NFSROOT=auto

-- /etc/crypttab
backup  /dev/sdc1   /etc/backup.key luks
sda5_crypt  /dev/sda5   /etc/swap.key   luks
sda6_crypt  /dev/sda6   noneluks
sda7_crypt  /dev/sda7   /etc/home.key   luks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel

Bug#521727: linux-image-2.6-686: desktop app are not responsive (kmail, firefox, OO)

2009-03-29 Thread Alain Baeckeroot
Le 29/03/2009 à 21:28, maximilian attems  écrit :
> 
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Alain Bkt wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> > Version: 2.6.26+17
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > Standard debian kernel lack responsiveness for a desktop usage.
> > - Kmail is unusable while checking new mails (in big dimap maildir)
> > - OOcalc cannot scroll smoothly a page with many graphics from a big
> >   calc sheet
> > - Firefox is soo slw
> > 
> > This can be easyly fixed by changing 2 settings in kernels
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> > CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> > CONFIG_HZ=1000
> > 
> > and for firefox, adding the one liner regression fix ofr 2.6.26:
> > Caused by:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=18ce3751ccd488c78d3827e9f6bf54e6322676fb
> > 
> > Fixed by:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78f707bfc723552e8309b7c38a8d0cc51012e813
> > 
> > for example see the comments in http://lwn.net/Articles/325307/
> > 
> > Maybe debian need a 2.6-desktop kernel, and not only server tastes.
> > 
> > With these 3 config change + patch, my desktop is usable again
> 
> if you would take 5 minutes checking the bug reports you would
> see that aboves bug is already reported and is tracked for
> the next 2.6.26 update.
I have checked but missed it, sorry to not be perfect :-)

> concerning preempt and higher hz that is left for dicussion on
> debian kernel and seems out of topic here.
should i fill a new bug tagged "wish" for a linux-image-desktop ?
It _does_ really change the usability with big documents/mail






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509733: Workaround and x version

2009-03-29 Thread DarkPhoenix
I didn't find any workarounds. I'm not a pro debian engineer though.

As for xorg - you may check its verion via X -version in terminal.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521515: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64: please restore symlinks into -common

2009-03-29 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Russ Allbery  writes:

> Could you open a bug on the openafs package when you get a chance
> (tomorrow or whenever) and we'll continue this there?  It looks like

Filed as #521745.  Kernel maintainers, apologies for the topic drift here.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?...@monk.mit.edu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 493863 initramfs-tools
retilte 493863 update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for newest 
kernel
stop

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:34:26PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:
> 
> > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:
> > > 
> > > > > It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the 
> > > > > one
> > > > > it was running at the time - 2.6.18.
> > > > 
> > > > sure you had the initrd symlink pointing to that one.
> > > > so it got attributed as the newest. 
> > > 
> > > I don't have symlinks.
> > 
> > please post on that box output of
> > sh -x update-initramfs -u
> 
> Ah.  there were symlinks in / - tho they were never ever used on this
> system.
> 
> Seems pretty broken to rely on symlinks that might (and are) years out
> of date.

has been such since version 0.65, where i changed to first use the
link then a heuristic for the newest image and afterwards only
the current kernel (which was first before).

as this symlink usage should be phased out i agree with you
that an update-initramfs -u call should try for highest version
first before falling back to the linked one.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: retitle 493863 to update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for newest kernel

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 493863 update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for newest 
> kernel
Bug#493863: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
Changed Bug title to `update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for 
newest kernel' from `firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 493863 initramfs-tools
Bug#493863: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
Bug reassigned from package `firmware-bnx2' to `initramfs-tools'.

> retilte 493863 update-initramfs follows symlink before searching for newest 
> kernel
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509733: A work round?

2009-03-29 Thread Berni Elbourn

Thanks, but is there a work round for this bug?

Berni

PS: How did you come up with 1.4 from 1:7.3+18?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521727: linux-image-2.6-686: desktop app are not responsive (kmail, firefox, OO)

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Alain Bkt wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.26+17
> Severity: important
> 
> Standard debian kernel lack responsiveness for a desktop usage.
> - Kmail is unusable while checking new mails (in big dimap maildir)
> - OOcalc cannot scroll smoothly a page with many graphics from a big
>   calc sheet
> - Firefox is soo slw
> 
> This can be easyly fixed by changing 2 settings in kernels
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> CONFIG_HZ=1000
> 
> and for firefox, adding the one liner regression fix ofr 2.6.26:
> Caused by:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=18ce3751ccd488c78d3827e9f6bf54e6322676fb
> 
> Fixed by:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78f707bfc723552e8309b7c38a8d0cc51012e813
> 
> for example see the comments in http://lwn.net/Articles/325307/
> 
> Maybe debian need a 2.6-desktop kernel, and not only server tastes.
> 
> With these 3 config change + patch, my desktop is usable again

if you would take 5 minutes checking the bug reports you would
see that aboves bug is already reported and is tracked for
the next 2.6.26 update.

concerning preempt and higher hz that is left for dicussion on
debian kernel and seems out of topic here.

so no banana for this report?! 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521691: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: 3c59x network interface fails to reach network a short time after boot and contact with UPS is lost

2009-03-29 Thread Håvard Moen
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64
Followup-For: Bug #521691


The same problem happens to me to with the 3c59x driver. Also when this
happens i loose contact with my Powerware ups connected via usb.

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.26 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.93   tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.7-pre9-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 suggests:
ii  grub   0.97-47lenny2 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v
pn  linux-doc-2.6.29   (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.29-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.29-1-amd64: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Comments regarding firmware-nonfree_0.15_amd64.changes

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:04:54PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 23:06 +, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > debian/copyright for firmware-linux says
> > "The binary firmwares are downloaded from
> > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree";
> > which is probably not true. Shouldn't that be kernel.org
> > or something?
> 
> This new package contains some firmware that is distributed in
> binary-equivalent form by kernel.org.  We should probably change both
> the upstream URL and the template for the package description.

but don't we want to change the upstream location anyway
to the tarball david woodhouse is putting on 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Comments regarding firmware-nonfree_0.15_amd64.changes

2009-03-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 23:06 +, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> debian/copyright for firmware-linux says
> "The binary firmwares are downloaded from
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree";
> which is probably not true. Shouldn't that be kernel.org
> or something?

This new package contains some firmware that is distributed in
binary-equivalent form by kernel.org.  We should probably change both
the upstream URL and the template for the package description.

Ben.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#521723: smartmontools: smartd fails on amd64 kernel with 3ware controller

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 521723 linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Bug#521723: smartmontools: smartd fails on amd64 kernel with 3ware controller
Bug reassigned from package `smartmontools' to `linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:
> 
> > > It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the one
> > > it was running at the time - 2.6.18.
> > 
> > sure you had the initrd symlink pointing to that one.
> > so it got attributed as the newest. 
> 
> I don't have symlinks.

please post on that box output of
sh -x update-initramfs -u



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:

> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:
> > 
> > > > It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the one
> > > > it was running at the time - 2.6.18.
> > > 
> > > sure you had the initrd symlink pointing to that one.
> > > so it got attributed as the newest. 
> > 
> > I don't have symlinks.
> 
> please post on that box output of
> sh -x update-initramfs -u

Ah.  there were symlinks in / - tho they were never ever used on this
system.

Seems pretty broken to rely on symlinks that might (and are) years out
of date.
-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521727: linux-image-2.6-686: desktop app are not responsive (kmail, firefox, OO)

2009-03-29 Thread Alain Bkt
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.26+17
Severity: important

Standard debian kernel lack responsiveness for a desktop usage.
- Kmail is unusable while checking new mails (in big dimap maildir)
- OOcalc cannot scroll smoothly a page with many graphics from a big
  calc sheet
- Firefox is soo slw

This can be easyly fixed by changing 2 settings in kernels
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
CONFIG_HZ=1000

and for firefox, adding the one liner regression fix ofr 2.6.26:
Caused by:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=18ce3751ccd488c78d3827e9f6bf54e6322676fb

Fixed by:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78f707bfc723552e8309b7c38a8d0cc51012e813

for example see the comments in http://lwn.net/Articles/325307/

Maybe debian need a 2.6-desktop kernel, and not only server tastes.

With these 3 config change + patch, my desktop is usable again

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-al (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 2.6.26-13lenny2 Linux 2.6.26 image on PPro/Celeron

linux-image-2.6-686 recommends no packages.

linux-image-2.6-686 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
maximilian attems schrieb am Sonntag, dem 29. März 2009:

> > It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the one
> > it was running at the time - 2.6.18.
> 
> sure you had the initrd symlink pointing to that one.
> so it got attributed as the newest. 

I don't have symlinks.
-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:25:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> reopen 493863
> thanks

no fun those games, thanks.
 
> 
> It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the one
> it was running at the time - 2.6.18.

sure you had the initrd symlink pointing to that one.
so it got attributed as the newest. 





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#485034: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network

2009-03-29 Thread Bill Wohler
maximilian attems  wrote:

> > I did, however, try WEP with 2.6.26. My box still did not associate.
> 
> could you please try a more recent kernel like 2.6.29.
> ath5k saw a lot of work since.

Thanks. There are a couple of issues which will get in my way:

1. The new kernels have really, really large /lib/modules directories
   and are too big for my / partition. I therefore do not anticipate
   upgrading the kernel on this particular machine any time soon. Know
   of any HOWTOs for resizing an encrypted LVM root partition? :-)

2. I'm using WPA now.

Sorry about that!

-- 
Bill Wohler   http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#485034: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network with WEP and AR5211)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:43:14 +0200
with message-id <20090329174313.gf3...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#485034: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but 
no network
has caused the Debian Bug report #485034,
regarding linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network with WEP 
and AR5211
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
485034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-4
Severity: normal

I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 to try and take advantage of
the new ath5k driver. My /etc/network/interfaces file says:

auto ath0
iface ath0 inet static
wireless_essid 
wireless_key 
address 
netmask 
gateway 

When I say "ifup ath0", iwconfig reveals that ath0 is associated to my
AP, ifconfig looks right (as it should with a static config). dmesg
looks great too:

ath5k_pci :02:02.0: registered as 'phy0'
phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid'
ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5211 chip found (MAC: 0x42, PHY: 0x30)
ath5k phy0: RF5111 5GHz radio found (0x17)
ath5k phy0: RF2111 2GHz radio found (0x23)
udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to ath0
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ath0: link is not ready
ath0: Initial auth_alg=0
ath0: authenticate with AP 02:1e:58:07:5d:f2
ath0: RX authentication from 02:1e:58:07:5d:f2 (alg=0 transaction=2 
status=0)
ath0: authenticated
ath0: associate with AP 02:1e:58:07:5d:f2
ath0: RX AssocResp from 02:1e:58:07:5d:f2 (capab=0x11 status=0 aid=2)
ath0: associated
ath0: switched to short barker preamble (BSSID=02:1e:58:07:5d:f2)
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ath0: link becomes ready
ath0: CTS protection enabled (BSSID=02:1e:58:07:5d:f2)
ath0: switched to long barker preamble (BSSID=02:1e:58:07:5d:f2)
ath0: no IPv6 routers present

However, I can't ping my access point.

At this point I'm not sure if the source of this problem is a bug, an
immature driver, or a lack of magic dust in my /etc/network/interfaces
file. Please advise.

$ lspci -nn |grep Ath
02:02.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5211 802.11ab 
NIC [168c:0012] (rev 01)

$ sudo lspci -v|less
02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5211 802.11ab NIC 
(rev 01)
Subsystem: Phillips Components Device 8310
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 168, IRQ 11
Memory at c021 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
Kernel driver in use: ath_pci
Kernel modules: ath5k, ath_pci


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (80, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.92a  tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.4-1  tools for managing Linux kernel mo

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 recommends:
ii  libc6-i6862.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i

-- debconf information:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.25-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.25-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.25-2-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.25-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.25-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.25-2-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.25-2-686: true
  linux-ima

Bug#500894: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: Broadcom (b43) wireless driver broken

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
> As you can see I get an enormous amount of messages (50/s) and after a
> minute or two connection (ad-hoc, WEP) dies. It works fine with 2.6.25.

can you give an update on newer kernel aka 2.6.29 linux images?

thanks for the feedback.


-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 521370

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 521370 pending
Bug#521370: mkinitramfs doesn't find firmware files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521553: rt2860 driver contains non-free firmware

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> I'd like to commit the following change.  Obviously this disables the
> drivers and they will have to be modified to work with external firmware.
> But I don't see why we should wait for that.
> 
> Ben.

ok for committing to trunk, so that can be sorted for 2.6.30.

don't see the need to have to rush that for 2.6.29,
who just happened to be uploaded.
 
> Index: debian/changelog
> ===
> --- debian/changelog  (revision 13283)
> +++ debian/changelog  (working copy)
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -linux-2.6 (2.6.29-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> +linux-2.6 (2.6.29.dfsg.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>  
>[ Martin Michlmayr ]
>* [arm/ixp4xx] Build in LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER (closes: #521141).
> @@ -6,8 +6,12 @@
>[ maximilian attems ]
>* linux-libc-dev: Bump versioned replaces libdrm-dev.
>  
> - -- Martin Michlmayr   Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:57:14 +0100
> +  [ Ben Hutchings ]
> +  * Remove firmware from driver/staging (closes: #521553)
> +- Disable affected drivers: rt2860, rt2870
>  
> + -- Ben Hutchings   Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:42:00 -0500
> +
>  linux-2.6 (2.6.29-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  
>* New upstream release
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-slicoss-disable.patch
> ===
> --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-slicoss-disable.patch  
> (revision 0)
> +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-slicoss-disable.patch  
> (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +diff --git a/drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig 
> b/drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig
> +index d2993d3..2b510e0 100644
> +--- a/drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig
>  b/drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig
> +@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> + config SLICOSS
> + tristate "Alacritech Gigabit IS-NIC support"
> ++depends on BROKEN
> + depends on PCI && X86 && NETDEV_1000
> + default n
> + help
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-otus-disable.patch
> ===
> --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-otus-disable.patch 
> (revision 0)
> +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-otus-disable.patch 
> (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +diff --git a/drivers/staging/otus/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/otus/Kconfig
> +index d549d08..fef9785 100644
> +--- a/drivers/staging/otus/Kconfig
>  b/drivers/staging/otus/Kconfig
> +@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> + config OTUS
> + tristate "Atheros OTUS 802.11n USB wireless support"
> ++depends on BROKEN
> + depends on USB && WLAN_80211 && MAC80211
> + default N
> + ---help---
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1
> ===
> --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1(revision 13283)
> +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1(working copy)
> @@ -57,5 +57,15 @@
>  
>  rm drivers/scsi/qlogicpti_asm.c
>  
> +rm drivers/staging/me4000/me*_firmware.h
> +
> +rm drivers/staging/otus/hal/hp*fw*.c
> +
> +rm drivers/staging/rt2860/common/firmware.h
> +
> +rm drivers/staging/rt2870/common/firmware.h
> +
> +rm drivers/staging/slicoss/*ucode.h
> +
>  rm sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx_image.h
>  rm sound/pci/cs46xx/imgs
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-me4000-disable.patch
> ===
> --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-me4000-disable.patch   
> (revision 0)
> +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-me4000-disable.patch   
> (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +diff --git a/drivers/staging/me4000/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/me4000/Kconfig
> +index 5e6c9de..45d2ea9 100644
> +--- a/drivers/staging/me4000/Kconfig
>  b/drivers/staging/me4000/Kconfig
> +@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> + config ME4000
> + tristate "Meilhaus ME-4000 support"
> + default n
> ++depends on BROKEN
> + depends on PCI
> + help
> +   This driver supports the Meilhaus ME-4000 family of boards
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-rt2860-disable.patch
> ===
> --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-rt2860-disable.patch   
> (revision 0)
> +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-rt2860-disable.patch   
> (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +diff --git a/drivers/staging/rt2860/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/rt2860/Kconfig
> +index 7f44e5e..9fb130d 100644
> +--- a/drivers/staging/rt2860/Kconfig
>  b/drivers/staging/rt2860/Kconfig
> +@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> + config RT2860
> + tristate "Ralink 2860 wireless support"
> ++depends on BROKEN
> + depends on PCI && X86 && WLAN_80211
> + ---help---
> +   This is an experimental driver for the Ralink 2860 wireless chip.
> Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/drivers-staging-rt2870-disable.patch
> ===
> --- de

Bug#493832: ath5k disconnects regularly and has poor performance

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
[ please keep bugreport on cc ]

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, koshmar wrote:

> maximilian attems wrote:
>> could you please retry with a recent kernel aka 2.6.29 ?
>
> Sure, I will check it in 2-3 days.
>
> 2.6.28 version of the driver was much better than the one I filled the 
> report for (2.6.26 AFAIR).

thanks for quick reaction. cool, yes indeed 2.6.26 was a very early
version of the ath5k driver and it stabilized a lot lately.

keep us updated. :)





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#461924: marked as done (firmware-iwlwifi: WLAN connection dies due to "Microcode SW error")

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:26:28 +0200
with message-id <20090329172628.gt7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-iwlwifi: WLAN connection dies due to "Microcode 
SW error"
has caused the Debian Bug report #461924,
regarding firmware-iwlwifi: WLAN connection dies due to "Microcode SW error"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
461924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461924
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I managed to connect to a WiFi network but after about a minute of surfing the 
internet connection died. While searching for the cause I stumbled upon such 
errors in 'dmesg':

--start dmesg snippet--
wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:18:39:a5:79:fc
wlan0: RX authentication from 00:18:39:a5:79:fc (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0)
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:18:39:a5:79:fc
wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:18:39:a5:79:fc (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=3)
wlan0: associated
iwl3945: Microcode SW error detected.  Restarting 0x8208.
iwl3945: Error Reply type 0x cmd REPLY_SCAN_CMD (0x80) seq 0x442F ser
0x
iwl3945: Can't stop Rx DMA.
wlan0: failed to restore operationalchannel after scan
iwl3945: No space for Tx
iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_ADD_STA: iwl_enqueue_hcmd failed: -28
iwl3945: No space for Tx
iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: iwl_enqueue_hcmd failed: -28
--end dmesg snippet--

I have no idea what the problem might be but "microcode SW error" gave me a 
hint 
towards the firmware.

My laptop has an Intel 3945 chip.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=et_EE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=et_EE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15

latest firmware package has newer microcode 
that together with newer driver no longer give those errors.
thus closing.

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: Bug#493863 closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 493863
Bug#493863: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493863: closed by maximilian attems (Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
reopen 493863
thanks

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

> > Maybe the firmware-bnx2 package should do "update-initramfs -u -k all"
> > instead of just "update-initramfs -u".
> 
> no.
> it was explicitly asked that packages in postinst only update
> the newest initramfs (which can be the one which has the symlink).
> yes conservative people want to have least possible "damage" policy,
> but it is easily overridable.

It didn't update the newest initramfs - for 2.6.24.  It updated the one
it was running at the time - 2.6.18.

-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511378: marked as done (bnx2 firmware not loaded)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:35:34 +0200
with message-id <20090329163533.gr7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
has caused the Debian Bug report #511378,
regarding bnx2 firmware not loaded
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
511378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: firmware-bnx2


Platform: Dell M600 blade
OS: lenny amd64 (freshly installed in December 2008) as a Xen dom0

Problem description:

Thursday, the blade hardware was swapped (an M600 replaced with another 
M600), same disks however.


Now, the ethernet devices don't appear after booting

Manual intervention is required to unload and reload the module bnx2 and 
then do ifup eth0


Things checked already:

- dmesg shows that devices are discovered during the boot phase, and an 
attempt is made to get firmware

- the initrd is definitely configured in grub (see below)
- I've extracted the initrd file, the firmware is definitely in there


title   Xen 3.2-1-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 
2.6.26-1-xen-amd64

root(hd0,0)
kernel  /xen-3.2-1-amd64.gz
module  /vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 
root=/dev/mapper/vg00-th1_root ro console=tty0

module  /initrd.img-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64

Workaround (not yet tested):

One workaround I am considering is to exclude the bnx2 module from the 
initrd, and then load it from /etc/modules.  However, it would be ideal 
if such workarounds could be avoided.




dmesg output during boot phase:


[1.497405] Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.7.5 
(April 29, 2008)
[1.497405] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :04:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, 
low) -> IRQ 17

[1.497405] firmware: requesting bnx2-06-4.0.5.fw
[1.502034] Fusion MPT base driver 3.04.06
[1.502034] Copyright (c) 1999-2007 LSI Corporation
[1.505058] Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.06
[1.533743] USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0
[1.533743] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1d.0[A] -> GSI 21 (level, 
low) -> IRQ 21

[1.533743] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1d.0 to 64
[1.533743] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: UHCI Host Controller
[1.533743] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: new USB bus registered, assigned 
bus number 1

[1.533743] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: irq 21, io base 0xcc80
[1.533763] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[1.535893] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.536011] hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
[1.559883] eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-SX (B2) 
PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem d800, IRQ 17, node addr 
00:22:19:90:e6:f8
[1.561968] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :06:00.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, 
low) -> IRQ 18

[1.565185] firmware: requesting bnx2-06-4.0.5.fw
[1.573238] eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-SX (B2) 
PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem d600, IRQ 18, node addr 
00:22:19:90:e6:fa
[1.573415] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :0a:00.0[A] -> <6>ACPI: PCI 
Interrupt :08:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16

[1.573415] mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
[1.573746] GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
[1.573936] firmware: requesting bnx2-06-4.0.5.fw
[1.579344] eth2: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-SX (B2) 
PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem da00, IRQ 18, node addr 
00:1d:09:73:c2:ec
[1.579509] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :0c:00.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level, 
low) -> IRQ 19

[1.579791] firmware: requesting bnx2-06-4.0.5.fw
[1.585043] eth3: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-SX (B2) 
PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem dc00, IRQ 19, node addr 
00:1d:09:73:c2:ee







--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Maybe the firmware-bnx2 package should do "update-initramfs -u -k all"
> instead of just "update-initramfs -u".

no.
it was explicitly asked that packages in postinst only update
the newest initramfs (which can be the one which has the symlink).
yes conservative people want to have least possible "damage" policy,
but it is easily overridable.

if you want to have all initramfs updated set in
/etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf

update_initramfs=all

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#513915: marked as done (firmware-bnx2: no network device, can't load firmware)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:35:34 +0200
with message-id <20090329163533.gr7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
has caused the Debian Bug report #513915,
regarding firmware-bnx2: no network device, can't load firmware
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
513915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-bnx2
Version: 0.14
Severity: important

Hi,

the standard kernel load the firmware unter /lib/firmware correct, but the 
xen-kernel canÃ't find the firmware files

system: Dell 1950

03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit 
Ethernet (rev 12)
Subsystem: Dell Device 01b3
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 214
Memory at f800 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=32M]
Capabilities: [40] PCI-X non-bridge device
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data 
Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 
Enable+
Kernel driver in use: bnx2
Kernel modules: bnx2

More information needed?

Greetings
Lars


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), 
(500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

firmware-bnx2 depends on no packages.

firmware-bnx2 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-bnx2 suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools 0.92otools for generating an initramfs
ii  linux-image-2.6.22.8-20 1.0.alex Linux kernel binary image for vers
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-68 2.6.26-13Linux 2.6.26 image on PPro/Celeron
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-xe 2.6.26-13Linux 2.6.26 image on i686, oldsty
ii  linux-image-2.6.26.7-20 standardserver.1 Linux kernel binary image for vers

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Maybe the firmware-bnx2 package should do "update-initramfs -u -k all"
> instead of just "update-initramfs -u".

no.
it was explicitly asked that packages in postinst only update
the newest initramfs (which can be the one which has the symlink).
yes conservative people want to have least possible "damage" policy,
but it is easily overridable.

if you want to have all initramfs updated set in
/etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf

update_initramfs=all

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#493863: marked as done (firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:35:34 +0200
with message-id <20090329163533.gr7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
has caused the Debian Bug report #493863,
regarding firmware-bnx2: doesn't rebuild all initrds
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
493863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-bnx2
Version: 0.4+etchnhalf.1
Severity: important

I installed the etchnhalf kernel, rebooted only to find out that I had
not network, booted the old kernel again and installed firmware-bnx2:

| thelma:~# apt-get install firmware-bnx2
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree... Done
| The following NEW packages will be installed:
|   firmware-bnx2
| 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
| Need to get 104kB of archives.
| After unpacking 279kB of additional disk space will be used.
| Get:1 http://mirror.came.sbg.ac.at etch/non-free firmware-bnx2 
0.4+etchnhalf.1 [104kB]
| Fetched 104kB in 0s (1818kB/s) 
| Selecting previously deselected package firmware-bnx2.
| (Reading database ... 62627 files and directories currently installed.)
| Unpacking firmware-bnx2 (from .../firmware-bnx2_0.4+etchnhalf.1_all.deb) ...
| Setting up firmware-bnx2 (0.4+etchnhalf.1) ...
| update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-5-amd64

Note how it doesn't rebuild the 2.6.24 etchnhalf initrd.  Needless to say
the system still didn't properly boot, only purging and reinstalling the
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 did the trick.

Maybe the firmware-bnx2 package should do "update-initramfs -u -k all"
instead of just "update-initramfs -u".


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Maybe the firmware-bnx2 package should do "update-initramfs -u -k all"
> instead of just "update-initramfs -u".

no.
it was explicitly asked that packages in postinst only update
the newest initramfs (which can be the one which has the symlink).
yes conservative people want to have least possible "damage" policy,
but it is easily overridable.

if you want to have all initramfs updated set in
/etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf

update_initramfs=all

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#521712: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686: Makefile_32.cpu file missing from header files for x86 architecture

2009-03-29 Thread hildebrand victor
Package: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: normal

On installation of the package there should be a file installed
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
This file has traditionally contained the cpu tuning information. An extra
driver which I use (virtualbox) when compiled with
this header refused to compile when I installed 2.6.29 kernel from sid and
the related headers. On inspection of the output I found this file is
missing.
The output on compiling was as follows:-
** Compiling vboxdrv
make KBUILD_VERBOSE= -C /lib/modules/2.6.29-1-686/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.1
SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.1 modules
make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686 \
KBUILD_SRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common \
KBUILD_EXTMOD="/tmp/vbox.1" -f
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/Makefile \
modules
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86/Makefile:41:
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu: No such
file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu'. Stop.
make[2]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

My module seems to compile when I put equivalent file from the stock 2.6.26
kernel headers which
ships with Lenny release and it seemed to work. Request the maintainers to
please put the file so that other people like me
building drivers needing the above mentioned file are able to do so. It
seems to be missing from the this kernel header package.
Thanks for your attention and keep up the excellent work being done by your
team.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.3   4.3.2-1.1  The GNU C compiler
ii  linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common 2.6.29-1   Common header files for Linux
2.6.
ii  linux-kbuild-2.6.29   2.6.29-1   Kbuild infrastructure for Linux
2.

linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Bug#503544: ath5k: after suspend to RAM, requires cold boot to work again

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Zack Weinberg wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:08 AM, maximilian attems  wrote:
> > could you please retry with a recent kernel aka 2.6.29?
> 
> I have seen the bug with both .27 and .28, but only intermittently,
> and not at all since I switched from network-manager to wicd.  I have
> now installed 2.6.29 on the machine, but it'll be some time before I
> can be sure it's not happening, assuming the bug is fixed.

ok cool, thanks for letting us know.
as 2.6.29 had quite some suspend path fixes.
 
> > thanks for feedback
> 
> I have to say I really don't appreciate the style of bug management
> where I file a bug, there is no response for months on end, and then I
> get a request to try a newer version.  It gives the impression that
> you're not actually doing anything about the bugs.

ath5k was quite young on 2.6.26 so it was somehow expected to fail there.
also you didn't seem to provide any updates nor did you go upstream.
it's not that we have too many guys working on those bugs,
so be happy at all to get asked.

kind regards.

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: severity of 509693 is important

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 509693 important
Bug#509693: new qlogic firmware available
Severity set to `important' from `wishlist'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 509693

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 509693 + pending
Bug#509693: new qlogic firmware available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521548: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: laptop toshiba qosmio g30 fails to boot with 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 kernels

2009-03-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:04:58PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.29-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to boot a toshiba qosmio g30 with linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64 and 
> linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 packages.
> Both starts to boot then laptop coolers go crazy (run too fast) and the boot 
> process stuck.
> The laptop works with linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Fathi
> 

please report upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org and let us know the bug
number.
you d have to add 2.6.29 dmesg and lscpi -vv output there.


thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



may you can help me, xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Schneider
Hello everybody 

I installed a xen system on my server, and it work fine (with
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64). But i need to recompile the kernel to
optimize some stuff. And the problem is I didn't found the source, because
when i do apt-get source xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64, it downloads
the source of linux-2.6-2.6.26 without Xen. I try to download the source of
xen.org and apply the path of kernel.org to have 2.6.26 kernel source, but
this doesn't work. 

Then my question is: how did you make this pakage
(xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64), and how to get the source of it, to
compile a kernel in the debian way and make .deb file for deploying on
others server. 

Please help me you are my last resort, I tryed everything but noting works.


Thanks for your Help. 

Thomas Schneider



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#460578: marked as done (firmward-iwlwifi: Does not connect to wlan)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:15:46 +0200
with message-id <20090329161546.go7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-iwlwifi
has caused the Debian Bug report #460578,
regarding firmward-iwlwifi: Does not connect to wlan
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
460578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmward-iwlwifi
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

There is no connection to wlan. I have to use the previous kernel
(2.6.22-3-1) plus ipw3945 to get a connection.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15


fixed in newer upstream driver and newer firmware.
both available in unstable.
thanks for the report.

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#459249: marked as done (firmware-iwlwifi: Kernel Panic when using aireplay-ng)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:15:46 +0200
with message-id <20090329161546.go7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-iwlwifi
has caused the Debian Bug report #459249,
regarding firmware-iwlwifi: Kernel Panic when using aireplay-ng
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
459249: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459249
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.9
Severity: important

Hi,

I use with success iwlwifi with my 3945 wireless card for WPA
connections or for dumping Wi-Fi data with airodump-ng. But when
I launch aireplay-ng program (for example aireplay-ng -1 0 -e
 wlan0), I have a Kernel Panic and I need reboot to have
an usable machine. You can see my kern.log here[*] and have trace
for KP at "Jan  3 19:57:52" or at "Jan  3 20:09:49".

[*] http://gcolpart.evolix.net/docs/iwlwifi-kern.log

Note: this is perhaps a bug with kernel, then feel free to reassign it
to linux-2.6 (you are probably more competent than me to say that).

$ lspci | grep 3945
03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network 
Connection (rev 02)

$ dpkg -l
ii  aircrack-ng  1:1.0~beta1-1 wireless WEP/WPA 
cracking utilities
ii  linux-image-2.6.23-1-686 2.6.23-2 Linux 2.6.23 image on 
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/
ii  firmware-iwlwifi 0.9 Binary firmware for Intel Wireless


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Regards,
--
Gregory Colpart   GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15


fixed in newer upstream driver and newer firmware.
both available in unstable.
thanks for the report.

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#516219: marked as done ([firmware-iwlwifi] Wireless Intel 3945 don't work more)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:15:46 +0200
with message-id <20090329161546.go7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-iwlwifi
has caused the Debian Bug report #516219,
regarding [firmware-iwlwifi] Wireless Intel 3945 don't work more
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
516219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516219
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.14
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Wireless don't work more. Output of /var/log/messages

Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.754491] firmware: requesting 
iwlwifi-3945-1.ucode
Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.883484] Registered led device: 
iwl-phy0:radio
Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.892910] Registered led device: 
iwl-phy0:assoc
Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.897800] Registered led device: 
iwl-phy0:RX
Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.902491] Registered led device: 
iwl-phy0:TX
Feb 19 18:17:14 portatil kernel: [   22.925860] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: 
link is not ready

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64

Debian Release: 5.0
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstablesft.if.usp.br 
  500 unstablehttp.us.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-===
| 





-- 
ASD Consultoria, Rio, RJ
Arq. Sávio M Ramos
Só usamos Linux desde 2000
www.debian.org


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15


fixed in newer upstream driver and newer firmware.
both available in unstable.
thanks for the report.

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#512696: marked as done (firmware-iwlwifi: Kernel panic when using iwl4965 and iwlwifi-4965-ucode-228.57.2.21)

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:13:26 +0200
with message-id <20090329161326.gn7...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: firmware-iwlwifi: Kernel panic when using iwl4965 and 
iwlwifi-4965-ucode-228.57.2.21
has caused the Debian Bug report #512696,
regarding firmware-iwlwifi: Kernel panic when using iwl4965 and 
iwlwifi-4965-ucode-228.57.2.21
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
512696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.14
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hello!

   I have a Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO Xi 2550 notebook with Intel 4965 Wi-Fi.
You can see the details of the hardware at my homepage:
http://phd.pp.ru/notebooks/FujitsuSiemens_AMILO_Xi2550.html.

$ lspci | grep -F 4965
04:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN
[Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61)

   I was using firmware-iwlwifi 0.14, iwlwifi-4965-ucode-228.57.2.21, and
the notebook regularly hanged - the system stuck and was flashing
Capslock+Scrollock indicating a kernel panic. I found a similar bug report
at http://intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1744 and did what
it advised - downgraded to iwlwifi-4965-ucode-4.44.1.20 downloaded from
http://intellinuxwireless.org/?n=downloads&f=ucodes_4965. After the
downgrade I haven't experienced any hangs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

firmware-iwlwifi depends on no packages.

firmware-iwlwifi recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-iwlwifi suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools   0.92o  tools for generating an initramfs
pn  linux-image(no description available)

-- no debconf information

Oleg.
-- 
 Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/p...@phd.pp.ru
   Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15

> Upstream marked the mentioned #1744 as a duplicate of
> http://intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1703
> which has been closed (and marked verified) in 228.57.2.23.


got uploaded for 0.15 thus closing.



-- 
maks

--- End Message ---


Bug#521691: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: Forcedeth network interface fails to reach network a short time after boot

2009-03-29 Thread Albin Stjerna
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: normal

Since upgrading to 2.6.29-1, my forcedeth-driven nforce4 network interface 
fails to reach my network a couple of minutes after boot. Removing and adding 
forcedeth (rmmod/modprobe) does not help, nor does ifup/ifdown cycle.

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.26 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.93.1 tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.7-pre9-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 suggests:
ii  grub   0.97-47lenny2 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v
pn  linux-doc-2.6.29   (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.29-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.29-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.29-1-amd64: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.29-1-amd64: true



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521523: Bug#521520: udev: floppy not autoloaded anymore

2009-03-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
tag 521523 patch
thanks

On Mar 28, Marco d'Itri  wrote:

> MODULE_ALIAS("pnp:dPNP0700");

Actually the correct patch is http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10405/ .

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#521520: udev: floppy not autoloaded anymore

2009-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 521523 patch
Bug#521523: it's about time that proper autoloading aliases are added to 
floppy.ko
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#521646: linux-kbuild-2.6: Not possible to rebuild debian/control

2009-03-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6

Hi,

trying to rebuild debian/control with or without local modifications to
control.source.in fails:

[...]
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6'
chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py
debian/bin/gencontrol.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 6, in ?
from debian_linux.debian import *
ImportError: No module named debian_linux.debian
make[1]: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6'
make: *** [debian/control] Error 2
(sid_i386)u...@debian:~/linux-kbuild-2.6$

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org