Bug#580661: , similar to Bug#572001

2010-05-17 Thread Gijs Hillenius
Hi,


I think this bug is the same as 572001. Something todo with KMS.






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6fjc9mj@hillenius.net



Bug#580661: caused by KMS, workaround is 'options radeon modeset=0'

2010-05-17 Thread Gijs Hillenius
hello,

disabling kms 'fixes' this bug


My /etc/modprobe.d/radeon-kms.conf
now reads:
options radeon modeset=0




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hn3ggij@hillenius.net



Bug#581876: Please apply upstream patch to fix the beep for some Thinkpad machines

2010-05-17 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,17.May.10, 02:48:28, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 
> Sorry, this patch cannot be applied on its own.  It depends on other
> changes to registration of 'beep' devices, and I'm not yet convinced
> that it's worth the risk to backport those changes.

Thanks for considering. If there's anything I can do to help please let 
me know.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://nuvreauspam.ro/2010/05/4-neticheta-pe-mail/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#581830: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: console and X display do not work unless nouveau is blacklisted

2010-05-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2010-05-17 04:26:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 14:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> For you, but not for most users.

Well, I didn't know that (bug 580894 is also set as "grave").
But note that the package is quite new, and most end users
didn't try it.

> Please report this upstream at  under
> product 'xorg', component 'Driver/nouveau'.  (I realise this isn't a bug
> in the X driver, but for bug tracking purpose the kernel and X drivers
> are grouped together.)
> 
> Let us know the upstream bug number/URL so we can track it.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28140

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517082215.gd24...@prunille.vinc17.org



Processed: bug 581830 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28140

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 581830 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28140
Bug #581830 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: console and X display do 
not work unless nouveau is blacklisted
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28140'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581830: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581830
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127409138930488.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#551101: still exists

2010-05-17 Thread martin f krafft
I am running 2.6.32 and am faced by exactly this problem on
a machine I cannot just reboot:

  % ps aux | egrep -c '\.+vgdisplay'
  37821

lsof or strace on existing processes don't show anything, but strace
on a new vgdisplay process shows that it blocks on opening
/dev/cdrom, which seems to be defective.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Bug#581952: please backport vhost_net

2010-05-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

We want this for squeeze because it greatly improve networking
performances of KVM guest to almost native levels.
The patch is fully self-contained, so hopefully it will be trivial to
backport.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=3a4d5c94e959359ece6d6b55045c3f046677f55c

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#568755: please backport the macvtap driver

2010-05-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 07, Marco d'Itri  wrote:

> (The patch is not yet upstream but it is expected to be merged as soon
> as the next merge window is opened. If you want to wait then the bug can
> serve as a reminder.)
macvtap has been merged in 2.6.34:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=20d29d7a916a47bf533b5709437fe735b6b5b79e

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


bug report for xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-686 (+policy issue)

2010-05-17 Thread Miles Fidelman
Just came across an interesting install bug, that illustrates a 
potential class of gotchas to watch out for, that might want to be 
addressed in the Debian Policy (more at end).


I installed xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-686 on Lenny, using 
DRBD-backed disk volumes.  And all worked fine when starting and 
stopping VMs manually.


The thing is, that the xen installer sticks S21xendomains into 
../rc.d - but DRBD doesn't initialize until later (S70drbd).  Hence 
any virtual machines that are set for auto-start, or saved for 
auto-resume, fail during boot - they're looking for boot drives that 
don't yet exist.


The fix is simple, rename S21xendomains to S76xendomains (I put it after 
S75hearbeat as well, since I expect there might be some interactions 
there as well - that's what I'll be working on next - as you may 
surmise, I'm building a failover environment).


Seems like a fix should make its way into the xen distribution, or at 
least into the README.Debian.  And it seems illustrative of a more 
general issue of initialization inter-dependencies - which really isn't 
called out in the Debian Policy section on initialization scripts.


Regards,

Miles Fidelman


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In  practice, there is.    Yogi Berra



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bf13528.4090...@meetinghouse.net



Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-05-17 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== initramfs-tools:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #576603 
  stay in sid to settle dust
= No migration to testing for 41 days.
  See 

=== linux-2.6:
= 6 Release Critical bug(s):
- #561203 
  threads and fork on machine with VIPT-WB cache
- #564110 
  r8169: Fix for CVE-2009-1389 introduces denial of service issue
- #569797 
  misaligned signal stack on sparc
- #572442 
  sparc 2.6.29+ NMI watchdog deadlock on Sun Fire V240 etc
- #572618 
  libata missing workaround for HPA overlapping normal partitions
- #574795 
  libata missing workaround for HPA overlapping normal partitions
= No migration to testing for 60 days.
  See 

=== nfs-utils:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #574510 
  statd running as root after remove/install
= 1 Release Goals bug(s):
- #508289 
  [nfs-common] mount nfs at boot fails when insserv with shell or startpar 
concurrency is enabled
  Part of release goal: dependency-based init system

=== Packages with lintian errors and warnings:
- linux-2.6 (113 errors, 352 warnings)
  

- nfs-utils (0 errors, 8 warnings)
  


 interesting stuff probably ends here 
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ker...@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oe2p3-000727...@samosa.debian.org



Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Powell
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: serious

(Note: I opened this bug report with a severity of "serious", since it
prevents my system from booting.  In my humble opinion this makes the
package unsuitable for release in a stable release.  But I am not a
package maintainer nor the release manager; so you can argue with me about
the severity if you think it is warranted.)

I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture.  I just performed
an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the
updates was a new version of initramfs-tools: 0.94.4.  (I noticed that
Debian bug report 576603 was opened with a severity of "serious" with the
apparent goal of keeping the package from migrating from Sid to Squeeze,
and the bug has not been marked as resolved, nevertheless the package
did migrate to Squeeze within the past few days.)

The new package completely broke my system's ability to boot.  Allow me
to explain the boot mechanism that the old version successfully accomplished,
and then explain how the new version fails.  I have four different disks,
one partition each, that are mounted on four different mount points,
as follows:

   Device   Mount Point
   0200 /
   0201 /boot
   0202 /home
   0203 swap

I have a file called /etc/modprobe.d/dasd which contains the following
statement:

   options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)

This accomplishes two things: (1) it guarantees the correspondence of
Linux devices names to s390 device numbers as follows:

   Device

   0200   /dev/dasda
   0201   /dev/dasdb
   0202   /dev/dasdc
   0203   /dev/dasdd

and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:
-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/738852436.193388.1274110769225.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#582003: nfs-common: nfs client ignores "port=2049" option when mounting

2010-05-17 Thread Paul Millar
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

Hi,

I'm trying to mount an NFS server that isn't registered in the portmapper.  I
believe this has worked in the past and something changed moderately recently
(probably between 2009-11-19 and 2010-5-1) that broke this behaviour.

The options supplied to mount (via -o) are:

nfsvers=2,nolock,udp,noac,intr,rw,mountport=,port=2049

(where  is the UDP port of the NFS mount daemon; the mount daemon isn't
bound to some well-known port, but is discovered by a support script)

An attempt to mount the NFS server using the above options fails.  Watching the
network traffic, I see the following SunRPC calls:

  1. SunRPC NULL call to a MOUNT service (running on UDP port ) ... this
is successful
  2. SunRPC MNT call to a MOUNT service (running on UDP port ) ... this
is successful
  3. SunRPC GETPORT call to Portmap service .. this is unsuccessful (no
registered program)

The failing GETPORT call to portmapper is querying for program 1003 (NFS),
version 2, proto UDP.  The failure of this call is expected: the NFS server
isn't registered in the portmapper service, so such a query should fail.
However, what isn't clear is why the client is calling the Portmapper service
since the port number has been supplied in the mount options ("port=2049")

What is interesting is if a different port value is specified (e.g.,
"port=2050") then the network interaction changes to:

  1. SunRPC NULL call to a MOUNT service ... this is successful
  2. SunRPC MNT call to a MOUNT service ... this is successful
  3. SunRPC NULL call to UDP port 2050 ... this is unsuccessful (no reply)

Since there is no program listening on port 2050, the attempt to call NULL on
that port will have no reply (the mount will eventually time-out); however,
notice how no attempt is made to contact the Portmapper service to discover the
NFS daemon port.

I'd speculate that the problem here is that port=2049 is somehow used as a
place-holder value indicating that the NFS daemon port value is unknown.  If
so, then the system will be unable to distinguish between a mount request with
options including "port=2049" and options without any "port" option.  However,
the behaviour of the NFS client should be different: if port=2049 is specified
then the RPC portmapper lookup is unnecessary and should be avoided.

It's unclear to me whether the problem is in mount.nfs or with the Linux kernel
itself (fs/nfs).  I've assigned it to nfs-common as an initial guess, but the
problem may lie in the kernel code.

NB, I'm running the Nouveau kernel, which is based on 2.6.32 whilst waiting for
2.6.33 (and the Nouveau DRM driver) to appear in sid.  This NFS problem could
be an artifact of using this kernel; but I've scanned the changelog of the
2.6.32 kernels and there doesn't seem to be a fix for this issue mentioned.

Cheers,

Paul.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-20100317 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages nfs-common depends on:
ii  adduser  3.112   add and remove users and groups
ii  initscripts  2.87dsf-10  scripts for initializing and shutt
ii  libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcap2  1:2.17-2support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libcomerr2   1.41.11-1   common error description library
ii  libevent-1.4-2   1.4.13-stable-1 An asynchronous event notification
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8.1+dfsg-2MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k
ii  libgssglue1  0.1-4   mechanism-switch gssapi library
ii  libk5crypto3 1.8.1+dfsg-2MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C
ii  libkrb5-31.8.1+dfsg-2MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libnfsidmap2 0.23-2  An nfs idmapping library
ii  librpcsecgss30.19-2  allows secure rpc communication us
ii  libwrap0 7.6.q-18Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  lsb-base 3.2-23.1Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  netbase  4.41Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  portmap  6.0.0-2 RPC port mapper
ii  ucf  3.0025  Update Configuration File: preserv

nfs-common recommends no packages.

nfs-common suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100517152309.31520.88093.report...@zitpcx6184.desy.de



Processed: tagging 466977

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 466977 + pending
Bug #466977 [linux-2.6] 2.6.24-1-sb1-bcm91250a mipsel hangs running init
Bug #404951 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: sb1-bcm91250a kernel does not boot
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #466977 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #404951 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
466977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1274112483652.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Powell
Oops!  I accidentally sent the e-mail prematurely.  Allow me to continue ...

and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:

   Device   Device
   Name Driver
   --   -
   /dev/dasda   dasd_diag_mod
   /dev/dasdb   dasd_eckd_mod
   /dev/dasdc   dasd_diag_mod
   /dev/dasdd   dasd_diag_mod

I run Debian GNU/Linux in a virtual machine under IBM's z/VM operating
system, of course.  Otherwise, the DIAG driver cannot be used.
The way the module dependencies work, the modules must be loaded in
the following order:

   (1) dasd_mod (no dependencies on another module)
   (2) dasd_diag_mod (dependency on dasd_mod)
   (3) dasd_eckd_mod or dasd_fba_mod (both have a dependency on dasd_mod)

Although strictly speaking neither dasd_eckd_mod nor dasd_fba_mod have a
dependency on dasd_diag_mod, nevertheless dasd_diag_mod must be loaded
*before* either dasd_eckd_mod or dasd_fba_mod if a dasd of that type is
to use the DIAG driver.  To guarantee this I have the following lines
in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules:

   dasd_mod
   dasd_diag_mod

in that order.  Neither dasd_eckd_mod nor dasd_fba_mod are listed here,
since they are loaded as needed by the hot plug system (i.e. udev).
I do not use sysconfig-hardware "touch files"
(i.e. /etc/sysconfig/hardware/config-ccw-0.0.0200,
/etc/sysconfig/hardware/config-ccw-0.0.0201, etc.), since I have had
trouble in the past getting one of these devices varied offline
dynamically if they are brought online at boot time via this method.
Instead, I bring the devices online at boot time via the dasd option
passed to the dasd_mod module via the /etc/modprobe.d/dasd file.

All of this has been working flawlessly through a number of releases
until now.  All of a sudden, nothing works.  The boot process times
out waiting for the permanent root file system and drops me into an
ash shell while the initial RAM filesystem is still mounted as /.

I investigated and found that /etc/modprobe.d/dasd was not included
in the initial RAM filesystem.  That's a problem!  Seeing that all
other files that were included in /etc/modprobe.d had an extension of
.conf, I renamed /etc/modprobe.d/dasd to /etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf,
rebuilt the initial RAM filesystem, re-ran zipl, and rebooted.
This time it tried to bring the devices online but got errors of the form:

   dasd: 0.0.0200 Setting the DASD online failed because of missing DIAG 
discipline
   dasd: 0.0.0200: Setting the DASD online failed with rc=-19

0.0.0201 (/dev/dasdb) was the only device that it could get online.
I knew immediately what was the cause of this: dasd_diag_mod was not
loaded soon enough.  By the time it dropped me into an ash shell,
dasd_diag_mod was loaded, but at the time that dasd_eckd_mod was
trying to bring the devices online, dasd_diag_mod was not loaded.  The
modules listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules must be loaded *before*
udev is allowed to do its thing.  The message

   udev: starting version 154

occurs in the log before

   Begin: Loading essential drivers ... done.

To further complicate matters, it appears that the entire /etc/initramfs-tools
directory, including /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, is absent from the
initial RAM filesystem.  How would it even know what modules need to be
loaded as "essential drivers" if this file is not present?

A new kernel, linux-image-2.6.32-5-s390x, was also included in the upgrade;
so perhaps this is part of the problem as well.  Previously, I was using
linux-image-2.6.32-3-s390x.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1715772729.195258.1274113995407.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
severity 582002 important
stop

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> 
> I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture.  I just performed
> an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the
> updates was a new version of initramfs-tools: 0.94.4.  (I noticed that
> Debian bug report 576603 was opened with a severity of "serious" with the
> apparent goal of keeping the package from migrating from Sid to Squeeze,
> and the bug has not been marked as resolved, nevertheless the package
> did migrate to Squeeze within the past few days.)
> 
> The new package completely broke my system's ability to boot.  Allow me
> to explain the boot mechanism that the old version successfully accomplished,
> and then explain how the new version fails.  I have four different disks,
> one partition each, that are mounted on four different mount points,
> as follows:
> 
>Device   Mount Point
>0200 /
>0201 /boot
>0202 /home
>0203 swap
> 
> I have a file called /etc/modprobe.d/dasd which contains the following
> statement:
> 
>options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)

you need give it a .conf ending then it ends up in initramfs.
soon modprobe will not even look at your file without that ending.
this special needs to be reverted due to stable -> testing upgrade,
but will reappear soon.
 
> This accomplishes two things: (1) it guarantees the correspondence of
> Linux devices names to s390 device numbers as follows:
> 
>Device
> 
>0200   /dev/dasda
>0201   /dev/dasdb
>0202   /dev/dasdc
>0203   /dev/dasdd
> 
> and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:

iam not familiar where this files comes from,
so please feel free to reassign to whomever who created it.
and/or maybe to release notes.

thanks

ps thanks for reminding me of 576603, will nuke that and get soonest
   latest git out.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517171353.gh13...@baikonur.stro.at



Processed: Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 582002 important
Bug #582002 [initramfs-tools] Modules not loading in the proper order 
(initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
582002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582002
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127411884516447.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Oops!  I accidentally sent the e-mail prematurely.  Allow me to continue ...
> 
> and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:
> 
>Device   Device
>Name Driver
>--   -
>/dev/dasda   dasd_diag_mod
>/dev/dasdb   dasd_eckd_mod
>/dev/dasdc   dasd_diag_mod
>/dev/dasdd   dasd_diag_mod
> 
> I run Debian GNU/Linux in a virtual machine under IBM's z/VM operating
> system, of course.  Otherwise, the DIAG driver cannot be used.
> The way the module dependencies work, the modules must be loaded in
> the following order:
> 
>(1) dasd_mod (no dependencies on another module)
>(2) dasd_diag_mod (dependency on dasd_mod)
>(3) dasd_eckd_mod or dasd_fba_mod (both have a dependency on dasd_mod)
> 
> Although strictly speaking neither dasd_eckd_mod nor dasd_fba_mod have a
> dependency on dasd_diag_mod, nevertheless dasd_diag_mod must be loaded
> *before* either dasd_eckd_mod or dasd_fba_mod if a dasd of that type is
> to use the DIAG driver. 

you can use modprobe config here again see man modprobe.conf and
the softdep line.

> To guarantee this I have the following lines
> in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules:
> 
>dasd_mod
>dasd_diag_mod
> 
> in that order.  Neither dasd_eckd_mod nor dasd_fba_mod are listed here,
> since they are loaded as needed by the hot plug system (i.e. udev).
> I do not use sysconfig-hardware "touch files"
> (i.e. /etc/sysconfig/hardware/config-ccw-0.0.0200,
> /etc/sysconfig/hardware/config-ccw-0.0.0201, etc.), since I have had
> trouble in the past getting one of these devices varied offline
> dynamically if they are brought online at boot time via this method.
> Instead, I bring the devices online at boot time via the dasd option
> passed to the dasd_mod module via the /etc/modprobe.d/dasd file.
> 
> All of this has been working flawlessly through a number of releases
> until now.  All of a sudden, nothing works.  The boot process times
> out waiting for the permanent root file system and drops me into an
> ash shell while the initial RAM filesystem is still mounted as /.
> 
> I investigated and found that /etc/modprobe.d/dasd was not included
> in the initial RAM filesystem.  That's a problem!  Seeing that all
> other files that were included in /etc/modprobe.d had an extension of
> .conf, I renamed /etc/modprobe.d/dasd to /etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf,
> rebuilt the initial RAM filesystem, re-ran zipl, and rebooted.
> This time it tried to bring the devices online but got errors of the form:
> 
>dasd: 0.0.0200 Setting the DASD online failed because of missing DIAG 
> discipline
>dasd: 0.0.0200: Setting the DASD online failed with rc=-19
> 
> 0.0.0201 (/dev/dasdb) was the only device that it could get online.
> I knew immediately what was the cause of this: dasd_diag_mod was not
> loaded soon enough.  By the time it dropped me into an ash shell,
> dasd_diag_mod was loaded, but at the time that dasd_eckd_mod was
> trying to bring the devices online, dasd_diag_mod was not loaded.  The
> modules listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules must be loaded *before*
> udev is allowed to do its thing.  The message
> 
>udev: starting version 154
> 
> occurs in the log before
> 
>Begin: Loading essential drivers ... done.

it is necessary nowadays to have udev running when people put modules
in there due to firmware requirements. thus you cannot rely on
initramfs-tools second guessing module requirements anymore indeed.
 
> To further complicate matters, it appears that the entire /etc/initramfs-tools
> directory, including /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, is absent from the
> initial RAM filesystem.  How would it even know what modules need to be
> loaded as "essential drivers" if this file is not present?

no it is, just the location is a bit unusual conf/modules.
 
> A new kernel, linux-image-2.6.32-5-s390x, was also included in the upgrade;
> so perhaps this is part of the problem as well.  Previously, I was using
> linux-image-2.6.32-3-s390x.

that should be fine, but again i'm not a s390 porter,
so not familiar with this specific case.
anyway modprobe ordering seems the way to go.

thanks

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517173305.gi13...@baikonur.stro.at



Bug#582021:

2010-05-17 Thread IAN DELANEY

woops...
To correct some entries in the post, I got the kernels mixed up in making the 
report. 
It may not matter, the end description is right, but to straighten it out,

The kernel first used to boot lenny is the squeeze xen kernel, 2.6.32-bpo.4-xen
The original ubuntu kernel is  vmlinuz-2.6.31.6-xenU.
The recompiled kernel is kernel-2.6-xen-amd64-domU.

Booting squeeze with  2.6.32-bpo.4-xen and  kernel-2.6-xen-amd64-domU gave 
similar results.

In citing which kernel used, I cut and pasted wrongly due to so many runs , 
getting the wrong one for a couple of the entries if you look closely.


  
_
View photos of singles in your area! Looking for a hot date?
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/

Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Powell
I just tried a couple of things.  First, I thought this might be
related to the new dependency-based boot sequencing.  I tried
adding the line

   CONCURRENCY=none

to /etc/default/rcS to disable parallel booting.  But it didn't
do the trick.  I then rebuilt the initial RAM filesystem and re-ran
the boot loader after making the above change.  It still didn't
fix the problem.  Then I booted the old kernel.  It booted just fine.
But when I rebuilt the initial RAM filesystem for the old kernel with

   update-initramfs -uk 2.6.32-3-s390x

and re-ran the boot loader, then the old kernel wouldn't boot either.
So this is not related to the kernel.  It is definitely related to the
new version of initramfs-tools.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1209128820.198253.1274118663770.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#582002: [SOLVED] Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:33:05 -0400 (EDT), Maximilian Attems wrote:
> 
> you can use modprobe config here again see man modprobe.conf and
> the softdep line.

That did the trick!  I changed /etc/modprobe.d/dasd (now called
/etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf) as follows:

   options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)
   softdep dasd_eckd_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod
   softdep dasd_fba_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod

I also removed the two lines from /etc/initramfs-tools/modules

   dasd_mod
   dasd_diag_mod

since they are no longer needed.  I then rebuilt the initial RAM
filesystem and re-ran the boot loader (zipl).  It's working now!
Thanks for your help.  I'll leave this problem record open though,
to remind you that files in /etc/modprobe.d which do not have an extension
of .conf need to be re-enabled (at least for a while longer) to prevent
migration problems.  But my system is bootable again, now that I've made
the changes indicated above.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/964759525.199155.1274120274698.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#582002: [SOLVED] Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:17:54PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:33:05 -0400 (EDT), Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > 
> > you can use modprobe config here again see man modprobe.conf and
> > the softdep line.
> 
> That did the trick!  I changed /etc/modprobe.d/dasd (now called
> /etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf) as follows:
> 
>options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)
>softdep dasd_eckd_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod
>softdep dasd_fba_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod

cool, nice! :)
 
> I also removed the two lines from /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> 
>dasd_mod
>dasd_diag_mod
> 
> since they are no longer needed. 

yep.

> I then rebuilt the initial RAM
> filesystem and re-ran the boot loader (zipl).  It's working now!
> Thanks for your help.

happy it boots.

> I'll leave this problem record open though,
> to remind you that files in /etc/modprobe.d which do not have an extension
> of .conf need to be re-enabled (at least for a while longer) to prevent
> migration problems.  But my system is bootable again, now that I've made
> the changes indicated above.

#577981 is open for the transition no point in having two bugs for that.
unless you want to reassign this bug to debian installer or the package
that created aboves modprobe file, i'd say it can be closed.

thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517183159.gk13...@baikonur.stro.at



Bug#582002: marked as done (Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture))

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id 
<1630259876.200341.1274122778109.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#582002: [SOLVED] Bug#582002: Modules not loading in 
the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)
has caused the Debian Bug report #582002,
regarding Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 
architecture)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
582002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582002
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: serious

(Note: I opened this bug report with a severity of "serious", since it
prevents my system from booting.  In my humble opinion this makes the
package unsuitable for release in a stable release.  But I am not a
package maintainer nor the release manager; so you can argue with me about
the severity if you think it is warranted.)

I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture.  I just performed
an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the
updates was a new version of initramfs-tools: 0.94.4.  (I noticed that
Debian bug report 576603 was opened with a severity of "serious" with the
apparent goal of keeping the package from migrating from Sid to Squeeze,
and the bug has not been marked as resolved, nevertheless the package
did migrate to Squeeze within the past few days.)

The new package completely broke my system's ability to boot.  Allow me
to explain the boot mechanism that the old version successfully accomplished,
and then explain how the new version fails.  I have four different disks,
one partition each, that are mounted on four different mount points,
as follows:

   Device   Mount Point
   0200 /
   0201 /boot
   0202 /home
   0203 swap

I have a file called /etc/modprobe.d/dasd which contains the following
statement:

   options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)

This accomplishes two things: (1) it guarantees the correspondence of
Linux devices names to s390 device numbers as follows:

   Device

   0200   /dev/dasda
   0201   /dev/dasdb
   0202   /dev/dasdc
   0203   /dev/dasdd

and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:
-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 17 May 2010 14:31:59 -0400 (EDT), Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:17:54PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> I'll leave this problem record open though,
>> to remind you that files in /etc/modprobe.d which do not have an extension
>> of .conf need to be re-enabled (at least for a while longer) to prevent
>> migration problems.  But my system is bootable again, now that I've made
>> the changes indicated above.
> 
> #577981 is open for the transition no point in having two bugs for that.
> unless you want to reassign this bug to debian installer or the package
> that created aboves modprobe file, i'd say it can be closed.
> 
> thanks

Closing per above.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-

--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: initramfs-tools: no lvm in initramfs with 0.94.4

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 578007 moreinfo
Bug #578007 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: no lvm in initramfs with 0.94.4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
578007: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578007
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127413277111842.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.32-13_amd64.changes

2010-05-17 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.32-13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.dsc
  linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.diff.gz
  linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-base_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-openvz_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-libc-dev_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-vserver_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-xen_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oe8iz-0001ea...@ries.debian.org



Bug#578007: initramfs-tools: no lvm in initramfs with 0.94.4

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
tags 578007 moreinfo
stop


is your /tmp noexec mounted?


this bug report currently has zero information on what went wrong,
please respond on the followup request to send the output of

sh -x mkinitramfs -v -o /tmp/foo

for initramfs-tools 0.94.4

thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517185241.ga2...@stro.at



linux-2.6_2.6.32-13_amd64.changes is NEW

2010-05-17 Thread Archive Administrator
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-13.dsc
linux-base_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-base_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-openvz_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-openvz_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-vserver_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-vserver_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-xen_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-xen_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb extra debug
Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64
 This package provides the binary debug image and pre-built debug loadable
 modules for Linux kernel 2.6.32 on PCs with AMD64 or Intel 64 processors
 machines.
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb extra debug
Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64
 This package provides the binary debug image and pre-built debug loadable
 modules for Linux kernel 2.6.32 on PCs with AMD64 or Intel 64 processors
 machines.
linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb extra debug
Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64
 This package provides the binary debug image and pre-built debug loadable
 modules for Linux kernel 2.6.32 on PCs with AMD64 or Intel 64 processors
 machines.
linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64-dbg_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb extra debug
Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
 This package provides the binary debug image and pre-built debug loadable
 modules for Linux kernel 2.6.32 on PCs with AMD64 or Intel 64 processors
 machines.
linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-libc-dev_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.32-13_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-13_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-13_all.deb
xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
Changes: linux-2.6 (2.6.32-13) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  [ Frederik Schueler ]
  * sparc: Fix use of uid16_t and gid16_t in asm/stat.h
 .
  [ Moritz Muehlenhoff ]
  * Enable tomoyo (Closes: #562486)
 .
  [ maximilian attems]
  * backport KVM: x86: Extend KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS with selective updates.
(closes: #580652)
  * KEYS: find_keyring_by_name() can gain access to a freed keyring.
CVE-2010-1437
  * hppa, sparc, powerpc disable BLK_DEV_CMD64X.
  * topconfig enable PATA_CMD64X. (closes: #580799)
  * x86: Disable CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL as it causes boot failures on T410.
  * Add stable 2.6.32.13:
- [SCSI] Enable retries for SYNCRONIZE_CACHE commands to fix I/O error.
- [SCSI] Retry commands with UNIT_ATTENTION sense codes to fix ext3/ext4
  I/O errors.
- [SCSI] skip sense logging for some ATA PASS-THROUGH cdbs
  (Closes: #578129)
- raid6: fix recovery performance regression.
- raid456: Enable error-correction on singly-degraded RAID6
  (Closes: #581392)
- r8169: fix broken register

Processed: fixed 392592 in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 392592 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
Bug #392592 [src:linux-2.6] linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses some 
scripts when building external modules
Bug Marked as fixed in versions linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
392592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414531231116.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: reassign 392592 to src:linux-2.6, found 392592 in 2.6.18-2

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 392592 src:linux-2.6
Bug #392592 [linux-kbuild-2.6] linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses 
some scripts when building external modules
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-kbuild-2.6' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.29-1.
> found 392592 2.6.18-2
Bug #392592 [src:linux-2.6] linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses some 
scripts when building external modules
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.18-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
392592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414529830856.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: found 392592 in 2.6.29-1

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 392592 2.6.29-1
Bug #392592 [src:linux-2.6] linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses some 
scripts when building external modules
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.29-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
392592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741461293837.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 392592

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 392592 + pending
Bug #392592 [src:linux-2.6] linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses some 
scripts when building external modules
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #392592 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
392592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741461774100.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 562486

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 562486 + pending
Bug #562486 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: please enable tomoyo
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #562486 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
562486: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562486
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414905124517.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580652

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580652 + pending
Bug #580652 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-12 breaks KVM and QEMU
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580652 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414905324539.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580799

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580799 + pending
Bug #580799 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64: Should include 
pata_cmd64x driver instead of cmd64x
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580799 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414905624562.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 578129

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 578129 + pending
Bug #578129 [linux-2.6] please apply "skip sense logging for some ATA 
PASS-THROUGH cdbs" from 2.6.33
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #578129 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
578129: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414905924588.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 581392

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 581392 + pending
Bug #581392 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: A couple of RAID4/RAID6 
fixes from upstream.
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #581392 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414906324619.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 407217

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 407217 + pending
Bug #407217 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus 
N2100
Bug #486442 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus 
N2100
Bug #488495 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus 
N2100
Bug #494363 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus 
N2100
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #407217 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #486442 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #488495 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #494363 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
407217: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414906724649.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 573007

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 573007 + pending
Bug #573007 [linux-2.6] NIC r8169 doesn t start at restart on kernel 
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
Bug #575805 [linux-2.6] r8169 - Corrupting MAC address
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #573007 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #575805 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
573007: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573007
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414907124684.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 575207

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 575207 + pending
Bug #575207 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: budget.ko causes kernel Oops 
with TT-budget S2-1600 DVB pci card
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #575207 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
575207: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414907524709.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580467

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580467 + pending
Bug #580467 [linux-base] linux-base & linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 post-install: 
"... uninitialized value $label_len ..."
Bug #580453 [linux-base] linux-base: Fail to upgrade to 2.6.32-12
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580467 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580453 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414907924924.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580710

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580710 + pending
Bug #580710 [src:linux-2.6] linux-base: elilo needs simpler assignments
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580710 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580710: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580710
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414908225223.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580740

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580740 + pending
Bug #580740 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64: 0bda:8171 Realtek USB WiFi 
unsupported
Bug #580638 [linux-2.6] realtek r8192s_usb new_id
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580740 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580638 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414908525363.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 572618

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 572618 + pending
Bug #572618 [linux-2.6] libata missing workaround for HPA overlapping normal 
partitions
Bug #574795 [linux-2.6] libata missing workaround for HPA overlapping normal 
partitions
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #572618 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #574795 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
572618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414908925393.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 575223

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 575223 + pending
Bug #575223 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: please enable STV0900/STV0903(A/B) based DVB 
frontends (CONFIG_DVB_STV090x)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #575223 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
575223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414909225433.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 548090

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 548090 + pending
Bug #548090 [linux-2.6] [amd64-agp] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer 
dereference
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #548090 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
548090: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414910025512.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 566522

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 566522 + pending
Bug #566522 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-486: eth0 silently disapear 
after upgrading from 2.6.30 to 2.6.32-trunk (3c503)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #566522 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
566522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414909625472.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 466977

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 466977 + pending
Bug #466977 [linux-2.6] 2.6.24-1-sb1-bcm91250a mipsel hangs running init
Bug #404951 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: sb1-bcm91250a kernel does not boot
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #466977 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #404951 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
466977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414910325544.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580602

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580602 + pending
Bug #580602 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: mips FPU emulation broken
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580602 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414910625576.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 572842

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 572842 + pending
Bug #572842 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: "Clickpad" style trackpads as the ones found 
in an HP Envy 15 are not supported
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #572842 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
572842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414910925609.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 365349

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 365349 + pending
Bug #365349 [linux-2.6] Add support for creating a "debuginfo" package
Bug #492676 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: should be compatible with systemtap
Bug #500013 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6-amd64: Please provide a debug package 
for the kernel
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #365349 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #492676 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #500013 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
365349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414911325655.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 578349

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 578349 + pending
Bug #578349 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and 
debian/control review
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #578349 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
578349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414911725684.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579234

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579234 + pending
Bug #579234 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese program translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579234 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414912025710.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579864

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579864 + pending
Bug #579864 [linux-2.6] [I18N, DE] linux-2.6: updated german debconf translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579864 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579864
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414912325738.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 578994

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 578994 + pending
Bug #578994 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates 
translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #578994 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
578994: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578994
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414912725769.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579019

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579019 + pending
Bug #579019 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Estonian translation for debconf
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579019 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579019: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579019
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414913025799.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579268

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579268 + pending
Bug #579268 [linux-2.6] [l10n:cs] Initial Czech translation of PO debconf 
template for package linux-2.6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579268 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579268: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414913325823.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579308

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579308 + pending
Bug #579308 [linux-2.6] [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for linux-2.6 debconf
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579308 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579308
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414913625894.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 579763

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 579763 + pending
Bug #579763 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates 
translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #579763 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414914225935.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580538

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580538 + pending
Bug #580538 [linux-2.6] [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580538 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414914325956.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580855

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580855 + pending
Bug #580855 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [INTL:ja] initial Japanese debconf 
translation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580855 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414915026029.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 577227

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 577227 + pending
Bug #577227 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for 
debconf messages
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #577227 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
577227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414914625987.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 580915

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 580915 + pending
Bug #580915 [linux-2.6] [INTL:da] Danish translation of the debconf templates 
linux-2.6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580915 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414915326063.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 581399

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 581399 + pending
Bug #581399 [linux-2.6] [l10n:cs] Updated Czech translation of PO debconf 
template for package linux-2.6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #581399 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581399: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127414915626093.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#578152: NFS problems with kernel 2.6.32

2010-05-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 12:28 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.3-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-9~bpo50+1
> Severity: important
> 
> On pettersson.debian.org we're running the official Debian CD
> builds. The final step of this process involves copying hundreds of
> gigabytes of data over NFS to a Solaris server. Under this heavy NFS
> load, kernel 2.6.32 repeatably hangs; I/O stops and the system
> eventually becomes non-responsive. Log attached showing the kernel
> reports. We've tried UDP and TCP for the NFS connection, and different
> values for the rsize and wsize. No noticeable effect.
> 
> Under 2.6.26 the exact same copy process runs reliably.
> 
> If there's anything more we can do to help diagnose this, just let us
> know.

Several deadlock bugs in the NFS client were fixed in 2.6.32.11, which
is included in Debian's 2.6.32-11.  Please can you test whether the
current version from sid fixes the problem on pettersson?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: closing 576603

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # bug didn't fit purpose so nuke it
> close 576603
Bug#576603: stay in sid to settle dust
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to maximilian attems 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
576603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741514026669.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: severity of 576678 is important

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 576678 important
Bug #576678 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: breaks but continues if /tmp is 
mounted with noexec option
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
576678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741514086695.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: found 578152 in 2.6.32-9, tagging 578152

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # really 2.6.32-9~bpo50+1, but assume it's in this as well
> found 578152 2.6.32-9
Bug #578152 [linux-2.6] NFS problems with kernel 2.6.32
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-9' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-9'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-9.
> tags 578152 moreinfo
Bug #578152 [linux-2.6] NFS problems with kernel 2.6.32
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
578152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741514496949.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#581377: initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 581377 initramfs-tools
Bug #581377 [multipath-tools-boot] initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load 
correctly at boot time
Bug reassigned from package 'multipath-tools-boot' to 'initramfs-tools'.
> forcemerge 337176 581377
Bug#337176: troubles due to 32-bit chroot on amd64
Bug#581377: initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time
Forcibly Merged 337176 581377.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581377
337176: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741515827603.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: reopening 506533

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 506533
Bug #506533 {Done: maximilian attems } [initramfs-tools] 
initramfs-tools: includes .dpkg-new files into initrd
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
506533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741517418719.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 577981

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 577981 pending
Bug #577981 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: files in /etc/modprobe.d/ 
ignored (ie not copied) when building initramfs
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
577981: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12741517418709.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#581377: initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 581377 initramfs-tools
forcemerge 337176 581377
stop

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 06:24:12PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > an error like this:
> > ... /lib64/multipath/libcheckdirectio.so cannot open shared object file
> > Sorry, i didn't get the full message.
> > It semms that multipath is expecting this file in /lib64/multipath but
> > this file is located in /lib/multipath in the initrd-image.
> > When i create a symbolic link in lib64 pointing to lib/multipath the 
> > initializing of the multipaths works.
> 
> Almost certainly a bug in the multipath-tools package or its initramfs hook,
> not in initramfs-tools.  Reassigning.

this is a duplicate of #337176, badly reported.

will be working on it now that initramfs is GPL and can
"steal" the better dracut code in that area.

thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100518025116.gl13...@baikonur.stro.at



Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Ben,

On Sunday 16 May 2010 01:18:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [29747.217066] iwlagn :03:00.0: Failed to allocate SKB buffer with
> > GFP_ATOMIC. Only 1 free buffers remaining.
> 
> [...]
> 
> You are not testing the right kernel version.  This error message was
> removed by the first patch Max applied.

This is the log from syslog. The following kernel was used.

May 14 12:09:42 champaran kernel: [0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 
(Debian 2.6.32-13) (f...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Deb
ian 4.3.2-1.1) ) #1 SMP Sat May 8 22:47:58 CEST 2010


-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
"Necessity is the mother of invention."


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.