Bug#588426: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: fail to boot in a kvm virtual machine

2010-07-08 Thread Vincent Danjean
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-16
Severity: important

  Hi,

  I tried to install linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/2.6.32-16 in a kvm virtual
machine. With this kernel, it fails to boot. The virtual machine freeze after
the line:
[0.324387] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 4220k
(see below the full boot log taken from a serial console)
I tried to boot both with a serial console (attached to a tty in the host)
and with a vga video emulated screen. Same things happened.

  The kvm machine is a lenny with a few package from unstable

  Regards,
Vincent

PS: the severity can be increased if lots of people experiments the same thing
or lowered if this is specific to my configuration.

-- Package-specific info:
[log of a boot with a serial console with linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/2.6.32-16]

  Booting a command list

Loading Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 ...
Loading initial ramdisk ... 
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-16) 
(b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 
14:14:38 UTC 2010
[0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64 
root=/dev/mapper/ran-root ro console=ttyS0,9600n8
[0.00] KERNEL supported cpus:
[0.00]   Intel GenuineIntel
[0.00]   AMD AuthenticAMD
[0.00]   Centaur CentaurHauls
[0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[0.00]  BIOS-e820:  - 0009f000 (usable)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0009f000 - 000a (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0010 - 1fffb000 (usable)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 1fffb000 - 2000 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: fffbc000 - 0001 (reserved)
[0.00] DMI 2.4 present.
[0.00] last_pfn = 0x1fffb max_arch_pfn = 0x4
[0.00] PAT not supported by CPU.
[0.00] init_memory_mapping: -1fffb000
[0.00] RAMDISK: 17cf4000 - 1803b6c6
[0.00] ACPI: RSDP 000f8940 00014 (v00 BOCHS )
[0.00] ACPI: RSDT 1fffde30 00034 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCRSDT 0001 
BXPC 0001)
[0.00] ACPI: FACP 1e70 00074 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCFACP 0001 
BXPC 0001)
[0.00] ACPI: DSDT 1fffdfd0 01E22 (v01   BXPC   BXDSDT 0001 
INTL 20090123)
[0.00] ACPI: FACS 1e00 00040
[0.00] ACPI: SSDT 1fffdf90 00037 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCSSDT 0001 
BXPC 0001)
[0.00] ACPI: APIC 1fffdeb0 00072 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCAPIC 0001 
BXPC 0001)
[0.00] ACPI: HPET 1fffde70 00038 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCHPET 0001 
BXPC 0001)
[0.00] No NUMA configuration found
[0.00] Faking a node at -1fffb000
[0.00] Bootmem setup node 0 -1fffb000
[0.00]   NODE_DATA [9000 - 00010fff]
[0.00]   bootmap [00011000 -  00014fff] pages 4
[0.00] (7 early reservations) == bootmem [00 - 001fffb000]
[0.00]   #0 [00 - 001000]   BIOS data page == [00 
- 001000]
[0.00]   #1 [006000 - 008000]   TRAMPOLINE == [006000 
- 008000]
[0.00]   #2 [000100 - 0001684754]TEXT DATA BSS == [000100 
- 0001684754]
[0.00]   #3 [0017cf4000 - 001803b6c6]  RAMDISK == [0017cf4000 
- 001803b6c6]
[0.00]   #4 [09f000 - 10]BIOS reserved == [09f000 
- 10]
[0.00]   #5 [0001685000 - 0001685071]  BRK == [0001685000 
- 0001685071]
[0.00]   #6 [008000 - 009000]  PGTABLE == [008000 
- 009000]
[0.00] found SMP MP-table at [880f8990] f8990
[0.00] kvm-clock: cpu 0, msr 0:14ed701, boot clock
[0.00] Zone PFN ranges:
[0.00]   DMA  0x - 0x1000
[0.00]   DMA320x1000 - 0x0010
[0.00]   Normal   0x0010 - 0x0010
[0.00] Movable zone start PFN for each node
[0.00] early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges
[0.00] 0: 0x - 0x009f
[0.00] 0: 0x0100 - 0x0001fffb
[0.00] ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xb008
[0.00] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
[0.00] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0])
[0.00] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23
[0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
[0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 5 global_irq 5 high level)
[0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
[0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 10 global_irq 10 high level)
[0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR 

Bug#588452: softdep modules not included in initramfs when MODULES=dep is specified

2010-07-08 Thread Stephen Powell
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.97

softdep modules are not included in the initial RAM file system
when MODULES=dep is specified.  Here's an example from the s390
architecture:

/etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf:

   options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)
   softdep dasd_eckd_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod
   softdep dasd_fba_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod

(/etc/modprobe.conf does *not* exist)

/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy:

   MODULES=dep

/etc/initramfs-tools/modules:

   (dasd_diag_mod is *not* listed)

dasd_eckd_mod is included in the initial RAM file system.  I assume that
that is due to matching on the alias ccw:t3990m*dt3390dm*.  dasd_mod
is also included in the initial RAM file system.  I presume that that
is due to the fact that dasd_mod is a hard dependency of dasd_eckd_mod.
But dasd_diag_mod is *not* included in the initial RAM file system,
even though it is listed as a soft dependency of dasd_eckd_mod, which
has already been selected for inclusion.

On the system above, this prevents the system from booting, as the
devices marked for use with the diag driver, including the root file
system in this case, cannot be brought online.  Therefore, the permanent
root file system cannot be mounted.

I am able to circumvent the problem by explicitly listing dasd_diag_mod
in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, but this should not be necessary.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/922649436.38679.1278600800110.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Processed: tagging 588409

2010-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 588409 + pending
Bug #588409 [linux-2.6] perf (linux-tools-2.6.32) fails to build on many 
architectures
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
588409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127858885830721.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#588409: perf (linux-tools-2.6.32) fails to build on many architectures

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-16
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

perf fails to build for several reasons.

1. Its default CFLAGS include -fstack-protector which isn't available
on all architectures.

2. It has a configuration test which relies on linking with an output
file of /dev/null, which doesn't work on HP-PA.

3. The perf events feature requires architecture-specific code in the
kernel which hasn't been done for all architectures; thus some don't
even have a system call number assigned yet.

The first two problems are fairly easy to fix.  The third will be
addressed by restricting the architectures for which perf is built.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100708021506.23487.46969.report...@localhost



Bug#588433: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: tries to run update-grub, although grub isn't installed anymore

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-16
Severity: normal

Hi,

today the linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (2.6.32-16) package failed for me during the
configuration phase. When the postinst script is run manually, the following
happens:

$ sudo LANG=C /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-`uname -r`.postinst configure
Running depmod.
Running update-initramfs.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
initrd.img(/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-
image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 379.
vmlinuz(/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-
image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 379.
Running update-grub.
User postinst hook script [update-grub] failed to execute: No such file or
directory

So it fails to start update-grub, which is expected as I have purged all grub
packages from my system and replaced it with the extlinux bootloader instead.
However, grub-pc is still set as postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf:

$ grep grub /etc/kernel-img.conf
postinst_hook = update-grub
postrm_hook   = update-grub

Please note that I have never ever touched this file. It should not blindly
rely the existance of update-grub.

Cheers,
Fabian



-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-16) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 14:57:57 UTC 2010

** Command line:
initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 
root=UUID=e6445315-c5bf-4e2c-b011-3ed84748fd53 ro quiet 
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[1.267887] ehci_hcd :00:0b.0: irq 19, io mem 0xf0805000
[1.273371] libata version 3.00 loaded.
[1.276165] ehci_hcd :00:0b.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
[1.276207] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002
[1.276208] usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=1
[1.276210] usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller
[1.276212] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 ehci_hcd
[1.276213] usb usb1: SerialNumber: :00:0b.0
[1.276533] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[1.276596] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.276602] hub 1-0:1.0: 8 ports detected
[1.278578] ata_piix :00:01.1: version 2.13
[1.278925] ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver
[1.283457] scsi0 : ata_piix
[1.283803] scsi1 : ata_piix
[1.284000] ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xd000 irq 14
[1.284002] ata2: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xd008 irq 15
[1.284297] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: PCI INT A - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22
[1.284348] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: OHCI Host Controller
[1.284366] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus 
number 2
[1.284443] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: irq 22, io mem 0xf0804000
[1.340199] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0001
[1.340202] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=1
[1.340203] usb usb2: Product: OHCI Host Controller
[1.340205] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 ohci_hcd
[1.340206] usb usb2: SerialNumber: :00:06.0
[1.340284] usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[1.340302] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.340360] hub 2-0:1.0: 8 ports detected
[1.440679] ata2.00: ATAPI: VBOX CD-ROM, 1.0, max UDMA/133
[1.440943] ata1.00: ATA-6: VBOX HARDDISK, 1.0, max UDMA/133
[1.440945] ata1.00: 16777216 sectors, multi 128: LBA 
[1.441587] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
[1.441766] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
[1.441985] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  VBOX HARDDISK1.0  
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[1.442390] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROMVBOX CD-ROM   1.0  
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[1.478171] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 16777216 512-byte logical blocks: (8.58 
GB/8.00 GiB)
[1.478202] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[1.478204] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[1.478216] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, 
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[1.478336]  sda: sda1 sda2 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x xa/form2 tray
[1.481173] Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[1.481428] sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
[1.485832]  sda5 sda6 
[1.493719] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
[1.533184] sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
[1.533486] sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5
[1.765793] PM: Starting manual resume from disk
[1.765795] PM: Resume from partition 8:5
[1.765796] PM: Checking hibernation image.
[1.765982] PM: Error -22 checking image file
[1.765983] PM: Resume from disk failed.
[1.802971] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[1.802979] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[

Bug#588409: perf (linux-tools-2.6.32) fails to build on many architectures

2010-07-08 Thread Michael Cree

Regarding the perf tools:

Commit 5d7bdab75cd56d2bdc0986ae5546be3b09fea70a upstream should give the 
-fstack-protector-all test.


Regarding the Alpha architecture the following commits that are in 
v2.6.33 of the kernel upstream provide the performance event interface:


Commit fcd14b3203b538dca04a2b065c774c0b57863eec upstream adds the Alpha 
specific part for perf tools.


Commit a582e6f01b90211933e70edcec9bc0bbb1157402 upstream provides 
minimal support for performance events in the kernel for Alpha.  However 
it probably won't apply cleanly to 2.6.32 without commit 
21797c599c710d3851d241c4b50690f2482bf618 which wires up quite a number 
of missing syscalls, which in turn depends on 
6e17e8b9fb74b9fb9f6ea331f7f4a049c5b4c4b8 which wires up the syscall for 
recvmmsg that is new in 2.6.33.  Thus a modified 21797c599 is required 
for 2.6.32 to do all this;  I think I might still have the patch 
somewhere, but in any case I could regenerate it should you wish to have it.


Cheers
Michael



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c35b72d.5000...@orcon.net.nz



Bug#588452: softdep modules not included in initramfs when MODULES=dep is specified

2010-07-08 Thread Michael Prokop
* Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com [Thu Jul 08, 2010 at 10:53:20AM -0400]:

 softdep modules are not included in the initial RAM file system
 when MODULES=dep is specified.  Here's an example from the s390
 architecture:

 /etc/modprobe.d/dasd.conf:

options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)
softdep dasd_eckd_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod
softdep dasd_fba_mod pre: dasd_diag_mod

 (/etc/modprobe.conf does *not* exist)

 /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy:

MODULES=dep

 /etc/initramfs-tools/modules:

(dasd_diag_mod is *not* listed)

 dasd_eckd_mod is included in the initial RAM file system.  I assume that
 that is due to matching on the alias ccw:t3990m*dt3390dm*.  dasd_mod
 is also included in the initial RAM file system.  I presume that that
 is due to the fact that dasd_mod is a hard dependency of dasd_eckd_mod.
 But dasd_diag_mod is *not* included in the initial RAM file system,
 even though it is listed as a soft dependency of dasd_eckd_mod, which
 has already been selected for inclusion.

 On the system above, this prevents the system from booting, as the
 devices marked for use with the diag driver, including the root file
 system in this case, cannot be brought online.  Therefore, the permanent
 root file system cannot be mounted.

 I am able to circumvent the problem by explicitly listing dasd_diag_mod
 in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, but this should not be necessary.

For MODULES=dep we use modprobe as interface to detect dependencies.
To display the dependencies of dasd_eckd_mod you could run:

 modprobe --set-version=$(uname -r) --ignore-install --quiet --show-depends 
dasd_eckd_mod | awk '/^insmod/ { print $2 }'

which will not list dasd_diag_mod as a dependency AFAICS.

Quoting:

, [ modprobe.conf(5) ]
| COMPATIBILITY
|
|A future version of module-init-tools will come with a strong
|warning to avoid use of the install as explained above. This
|will happen once  support for  soft  dependencies  in the
|kernel is complete.  That support will complement the
|existing softdep support within this utility by providing
|such dependencies directly within the modules.
`

I don't want to include any special support for softdep just inside
initramfs-tools, instead I'd like to get an interface from
module-init-tools's modprobe that we could use for dependency
resolution.

Any objections against reassigning this bugreport to
module-init-tools (maks?)?

regards,
-mika-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#588426: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: fail to boot in a kvm virtual machine

2010-07-08 Thread Cristian Greco
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:36:48 +0200
Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org wrote:

 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-16
 Severity: important
 
   Hi,
 
   I tried to install linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/2.6.32-16 in a kvm
 virtual machine. With this kernel, it fails to boot. The virtual
 machine freeze after the line:
 [0.324387] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 4220k
 (see below the full boot log taken from a serial console)
 I tried to boot both with a serial console (attached to a tty in the
 host) and with a vga video emulated screen. Same things happened.
 
   The kvm machine is a lenny with a few package from unstable
 
   Regards,
 Vincent
 
 PS: the severity can be increased if lots of people experiments the
 same thing or lowered if this is specific to my configuration.

Hi,

I can confirm I had the very same problem with a kvm virtual machine
(amd64) upgraded from squeeze to sid. Downgrading to 2.6.32-15 from
squeeze made it able to boot again.

Thanks,
--
Cristian Greco
GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
 # remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
 #  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
 #  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
 #  * reopen upstream
 tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
Bug #571741 [linux-2.6] System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Bug #534422 [linux-2.6] Enabling KMS causes lots of segfaults after hibernation 
resume
Bug #545125 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #545517 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #576800 [linux-2.6] libc6: Cannot create new processes after hibernating
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
Usertags are now: .
 usertags 571741 + status-NEW
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
 # remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
 #  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
 #  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
 #  * reopen upstream
 tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
Bug #571741 [linux-2.6] System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Bug #534422 [linux-2.6] Enabling KMS causes lots of segfaults after hibernation 
resume
Bug #545125 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #545517 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #576800 [linux-2.6] libc6: Cannot create new processes after hibernating
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #571741 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #534422 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #545125 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #545517 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #576800 to the same tags previously set
 usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
 usertags 571741 + status-NEW
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
 # remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
 #  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
 #  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
 #  * reopen upstream
 tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
Bug #571741 [linux-2.6] System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Bug #534422 [linux-2.6] Enabling KMS causes lots of segfaults after hibernation 
resume
Bug #545125 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #545517 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #576800 [linux-2.6] libc6: Cannot create new processes after hibernating
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #571741 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #534422 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #545125 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #545517 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #576800 to the same tags previously set
 usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
 usertags 571741 + status-NEW
Bug#571741: System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
 # remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
 #  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
 #  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
 #  * reopen upstream
 tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
Bug #571741 [linux-2.6] System freezes after pm-hibernate when kms is on
Bug #534422 [linux-2.6] Enabling KMS causes lots of segfaults after hibernation 
resume
Bug #545125 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk 
corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk
Bug #545517 

Bug#588426: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: fail to boot in a kvm virtual machine

2010-07-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul  8, 2010 at 10:36:48 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:

 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-16
 Severity: important
 
   Hi,
 
   I tried to install linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/2.6.32-16 in a kvm virtual
 machine. With this kernel, it fails to boot. The virtual machine freeze after
 the line:
 [0.324387] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 4220k
 (see below the full boot log taken from a serial console)
 I tried to boot both with a serial console (attached to a tty in the host)
 and with a vga video emulated screen. Same things happened.
 
   The kvm machine is a lenny with a few package from unstable
 
   Regards,
 Vincent
 
 PS: the severity can be increased if lots of people experiments the same thing
 or lowered if this is specific to my configuration.
 
Likely the same as reported by weasel at
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.0/02385.html

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-08 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
#  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
#  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
#  * reopen upstream
tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
usertags 571741 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
#  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
#  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
#  * reopen upstream
tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
usertags 571741 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
#  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
#  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
#  * reopen upstream
tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
usertags 571741 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #571741 (http://bugs.debian.org/571741)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
#  * remote status changed: RESOLVED - NEW
#  * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?)
#  * reopen upstream
tags 571741 - fixed-upstream
usertags 571741 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
usertags 571741 + status-NEW

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100708163348.2376.83261.btsl...@merkel.debian.org



Bug#587093: link with uswsusp

2010-07-08 Thread Jean-Louis Biasini
After complete reinstall of the system it turns out that the problem is
link with uswsusp. Without it plymouth don't hang anymore while resuming
(althrougt there isn't any plymouth while resuming anymore) 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278608080.10807.2.ca...@pink



Bug#551821: [nfs-common] directory not mounted at boot-time

2010-07-08 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Hi,

this bug is the same as bug #540291.

-- 
Laurent Bonnaud.






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278610233.4599.6.ca...@localhost



Bug#588452: softdep modules not included in initramfs when MODULES=dep is specified

2010-07-08 Thread Stephen Powell
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:03:39 -0400 (EDT), Michael Prokop wrote:
 
 For MODULES=dep we use modprobe as interface to detect dependencies.
 To display the dependencies of dasd_eckd_mod you could run:
 
  modprobe --set-version=$(uname -r) --ignore-install --quiet --show-depends 
 dasd_eckd_mod | awk '/^insmod/ { print $2 }'
 
 which will not list dasd_diag_mod as a dependency AFAICS.

Output of the above command on my system:

   /lib/modules/2.6.32-custom5b-s390x/kernel/drivers/s390/block/dasd_mod.ko
   /lib/modules/2.6.32-custom5b-s390x/kernel/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.ko

In other words, it list only the module itself plus hard dependencies.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1294535410.43811.1278611163548.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#588458: 2.6.32-5-vserver-686

2010-07-08 Thread Jan Prunk
Same kernel configuration is missing also for 2.6.32-5-vserver-686.
Please apply the needed change in the upcoming release.

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Prunk   http://www.prunk.si
0x00E80E86  http://pgp.prunk.si



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinponaqt5f11ybojhzymbgj3sqw6v3d8ydhd...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#588461: Solved

2010-07-08 Thread Jan Prunk
The issue was solved, after running update-grub, the initrd line was
missing inside grub.cfg. Boots properly now.

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Prunk   http://www.prunk.si
0x00E80E86  http://pgp.prunk.si



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimtrcmt0jajdyhtxkcljsg2ruj3uses7dos4...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#573144: Re: Re: Re: Bug#573144: linux-image-2.6-686: kernel freezes related to i915 handle error

2010-07-08 Thread Zbynek Michl
So it has been really caused by xserver-xorg-video-radeon. I have downgraded 
from 6.13.0-2 to previous 6.12.6-1 and freezing gone :)

Zbynek

  On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:02:55AM +0200, Zbynek Michl wrote:
   So 2.6.32-3-686 freezes too. I don't know how to debug it, because kernel
  seems to be completely dead :(
   
   Zbynek
  
  did you check with latest experimental intel driver?
 
 I have tried the latest 2.6.34-1-686_2.6.34-1~experimental.2_i386 with no 
 luck.
 
  also we will shortly make 2.6.35-rcX available.
  the old intel driver support is since some time messy, sorry for that.
 
 Do you think intel driver in the kernel? Couldn't be there any connection with
 x.org driver (xserver-xorg-video-radeon in my case)?
 
 Thanks,
 Zbynek
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/4788.619.948-14764-2080684246-1278617...@seznam.cz



Bug#588433: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: tries to run update-grub, although grub isn't installed anymore)

2010-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:13:11 +0100
with message-id 20100708201311.gg5...@decadent.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#588433: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: tries to run 
update-grub, although grub isn't installed anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #588433,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: tries to run update-grub, although grub 
isn't installed anymore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
588433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588433
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-16
Severity: normal

Hi,

today the linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (2.6.32-16) package failed for me during the
configuration phase. When the postinst script is run manually, the following
happens:

$ sudo LANG=C /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-`uname -r`.postinst configure
Running depmod.
Running update-initramfs.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
initrd.img(/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-
image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 379.
vmlinuz(/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-
image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 379.
Running update-grub.
User postinst hook script [update-grub] failed to execute: No such file or
directory

So it fails to start update-grub, which is expected as I have purged all grub
packages from my system and replaced it with the extlinux bootloader instead.
However, grub-pc is still set as postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf:

$ grep grub /etc/kernel-img.conf
postinst_hook = update-grub
postrm_hook   = update-grub

Please note that I have never ever touched this file. It should not blindly
rely the existance of update-grub.

Cheers,
Fabian



-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-16) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 14:57:57 UTC 2010

** Command line:
initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 
root=UUID=e6445315-c5bf-4e2c-b011-3ed84748fd53 ro quiet 
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[1.267887] ehci_hcd :00:0b.0: irq 19, io mem 0xf0805000
[1.273371] libata version 3.00 loaded.
[1.276165] ehci_hcd :00:0b.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
[1.276207] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002
[1.276208] usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=1
[1.276210] usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller
[1.276212] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 ehci_hcd
[1.276213] usb usb1: SerialNumber: :00:0b.0
[1.276533] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[1.276596] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.276602] hub 1-0:1.0: 8 ports detected
[1.278578] ata_piix :00:01.1: version 2.13
[1.278925] ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver
[1.283457] scsi0 : ata_piix
[1.283803] scsi1 : ata_piix
[1.284000] ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xd000 irq 14
[1.284002] ata2: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xd008 irq 15
[1.284297] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: PCI INT A - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22
[1.284348] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: OHCI Host Controller
[1.284366] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus 
number 2
[1.284443] ohci_hcd :00:06.0: irq 22, io mem 0xf0804000
[1.340199] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0001
[1.340202] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=1
[1.340203] usb usb2: Product: OHCI Host Controller
[1.340205] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 ohci_hcd
[1.340206] usb usb2: SerialNumber: :00:06.0
[1.340284] usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[1.340302] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.340360] hub 2-0:1.0: 8 ports detected
[1.440679] ata2.00: ATAPI: VBOX CD-ROM, 1.0, max UDMA/133
[1.440943] ata1.00: ATA-6: VBOX HARDDISK, 1.0, max UDMA/133
[1.440945] ata1.00: 16777216 sectors, multi 128: LBA 
[1.441587] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
[1.441766] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
[1.441985] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  VBOX HARDDISK1.0  
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[1.442390] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROMVBOX CD-ROM   1.0  
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[1.478171] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 16777216 512-byte logical blocks: (8.58 
GB/8.00 GiB)
[

Re: [DRAFT v2] Policy for Linux kernel, initramfs, boot loader update process

2010-07-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Guillem Jover dixit:

A bit of background info. For GNU/kFreeBSD the kernel images are named
'kfreebsd-image-*', for GNU/Hurd they are named 'gnumach'. (I should
probably rename gnumach to match the current kernel naming convention.)

I wonder if there will ever be packages like kmidnightbsd-image-* for
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (it’s a relatively close fork of it, and the few
kfreebsd specific patch lines could be applied)…

bye,
//mirabilos, who’s had beers with the MidnightBSD founder recently
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.  -- Coywolf Qi Hunt


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1007082127010.18...@herc.mirbsd.org



Re: [DRAFT v2] Policy for Linux kernel, initramfs, boot loader update process

2010-07-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi!

So while this was presented as a draft for Linux kernels, it touches
interfaces shared with other kernels, so I think it would be nice to
try to get it to be kernel agnostic, CCing debian-bsd@ and debian-hurd@
just for that. The complete draft can be found in debian-ker...@.

A bit of background info. For GNU/kFreeBSD the kernel images are named
'kfreebsd-image-*', for GNU/Hurd they are named 'gnumach'. (I should
probably rename gnumach to match the current kernel naming convention.)

GNU/kFreeBSD can boot using either the native FreeBSD boot loader, or
grub. GNU/Hurd can boot with any multiboot compliant boot loader.

Currently neither make use or need any initrd image to boot, due to
using boot loader loadable modules. But there's been talk about adding
initrd support to gnumach for d-i.

On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:48:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 4. During a kernel package installation, upgrade or removal, various
 boot loader hooks may be invoked (in this order):
 
 a. A postinst_hook or postrm_hook command set by the user or the
installer in /etc/kernel-img.conf

kfreebsd-image-* packages honour those hooks. I'll add support for
those to gnumach.

 b. A hook script in /etc/initramfs/post-update.d

Neither kfreebsd nor gnumach honour this, not needed yet though.

 c. A hook script in /etc/kernel/postinst.d or .../postrm.d

Neither do honour these, they need support added. I can probably make
some time to do that for both.

 To avoid unnecessary updates, the hooks invoked at step a and b may
 check whether $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE begins with 'linux-image-' and
 do nothing in this case.

Take into account that DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE is only set if running
under dpkg, dpkg-reconfigure (from debconf) does not set this nor other
variables yet. See #560317.

It would be nice to consider the other kernel package names. But even
nicer to just have a centralized place where all currently known package
patterns are listed or can be queried so that there's no need to update
multiple scripts on new kernel additions, or name convention changes.

 5. Kernel packages must not invoke boot loaders except via hooks.
 If /etc/kernel-img.conf contains 'do_bootloader = yes' or equivalent,
 maintainer scripts that previously acted on this must warn that they are
 ignoring it.  linux-base must also warn on upgrade that the default has
 changed.  In squeeze+1, this prohibition extends to initramfs builder
 packages.

Neither kfreebsd-image-* nor gnumach packages have ever honoured
do_bootloader.

thanks,
guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100708075158.gb31...@gaara.hadrons.org



Re: Proposed changes to initramfs-tools hook scripts

2010-07-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, maximilian attems wrote:

 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
 
  Max,
  
  As promised, here are my proposed changes to the initramfs-tools hook 
  scripts.
  
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
  http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  
  /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools:
  http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools
  
  I release the changes under the same license as currently used.
  I did not include the scripts or patches in-line in my e-mail because my
  e-mail client has the nasty habit of expanding tabs, inserting extra line
  breaks, etc.  So I up-loaded the files to my web site and included links
  to them in this e-mail.
  
  Changes:
  
  (1) Does not create an initial RAM file system image for a custom kernel
  created by make-kpkg if one was not requested by the --initrd flag of
  make-kpkg.
  
  (2) Redirects STDOUT to STDERR when invoking update-initramfs.
  (Avoids output being swallowed by debconf's redirection of STDOUT.)
  
  (3) Postinst.d version always exits with status code zero, even if an
  error occurs attempting to delete the initramfs.
 
 thank you very much. applied your 3 changes to branch maks/hooks on
 http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary
 please review before I'd merge into master for next upload.
 
 I'm not sure if the indirection to STDERR is needed for make deb-pkg,
 but it shouldn't hurt there?

so mika reviewed
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/maks/hooks

he critisize the exit 0 without any stdout/stderr message.
so rethinking why do you want that anyway?

I do not see the point of it, update-initramfs is already told
to not care if that initramfs exists with the takeover flag
so will not errexit.

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100708132402.gc2...@stro.at



Bug#582826: Oops: 0002 unable to handle kernel paging request

2010-07-08 Thread paul . szabo
For the record only. - My machine has been occasionally (far too
regularly, every couple of weeks) crashing with the same error as
reported. Other machines, similar hardware and identical kernel,
did not seem affected. - Today I updated the kernels to one based
on 2.6.26-24, will monitor whether that helps.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/201007082254.o68ms066031...@bari.maths.usyd.edu.au



Processed: reassign 588466 to initramfs-tools

2010-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 588466 initramfs-tools
Bug #588466 [klibc-utils] klibc-utils: kernel panic when resume failed and 
normal boot continues
Bug reassigned from package 'klibc-utils' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions klibc/1.5.18-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
588466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12786321153415.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Proposed changes to initramfs-tools hook scripts

2010-07-08 Thread Stephen Powell
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:24:02 -0400 (EDT), maximilian attems wrote:
 
 so mika reviewed
 http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/maks/hooks
 
 he critisize the exit 0 without any stdout/stderr message.
 so rethinking why do you want that anyway?
 
 I do not see the point of it, update-initramfs is already told
 to not care if that initramfs exists with the takeover flag
 so will not errexit.

You're right.  With the -t flag, attempting to delete a non-existent
initial RAM file system does not cause an error exit.  Exit status
is zero, even if the file does not exist.  The exit 0 is unnecessary.
Good catch, Mika!

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1884856145.37359.1278598343367.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#588409: perf (linux-tools-2.6.32) fails to build on many architectures

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:31 +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
 Regarding the perf tools:
 
 Commit 5d7bdab75cd56d2bdc0986ae5546be3b09fea70a upstream should give the 
 -fstack-protector-all test.

Thanks; I've applied this and several other upstream build fixes and
improvements:

perf tools: Display better error messages on missing packages
perf tools: Add 'make DEBUG=1' to remove the -O6 cflag
perf tools: Test -fstack-protector-all compiler option for inclusion in CFLAGS
perf tools: Support static build
perf tools: Add V=2 option to help debug config issues
perf tools: Suggest static libraries as well
perf: Use default compiler mode by default
perf tools: Move QUIET_STDERR def to before first use
perf tools: Check if /dev/null can be used as the -o gcc argument

 Regarding the Alpha architecture the following commits that are in 
 v2.6.33 of the kernel upstream provide the performance event interface:
 
 Commit fcd14b3203b538dca04a2b065c774c0b57863eec upstream adds the Alpha 
 specific part for perf tools.
 
 Commit a582e6f01b90211933e70edcec9bc0bbb1157402 upstream provides 
 minimal support for performance events in the kernel for Alpha.  However 
 it probably won't apply cleanly to 2.6.32 without commit 
 21797c599c710d3851d241c4b50690f2482bf618 which wires up quite a number 
 of missing syscalls, which in turn depends on 
 6e17e8b9fb74b9fb9f6ea331f7f4a049c5b4c4b8 which wires up the syscall for 
 recvmmsg that is new in 2.6.33.  Thus a modified 21797c599 is required 
 for 2.6.32 to do all this;  I think I might still have the patch 
 somewhere, but in any case I could regenerate it should you wish to have it.

I'll be happy to apply backported patches.  However, Alpha is no longer
a Debian release architecture and I don't intend to spend any
significant time on it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: your mail

2010-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 583933 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Bug #583933 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Latest 
radeon + KMS ASIC bug error message
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-video-radeon' to 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-video-ati/1:6.13.0-2.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583933: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583933
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12786510676131.transcr...@bugs.debian.org