date:20100722

Processed: tagging 583968, reassign 583968 to linux-2.6

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 583968 - squeeze
Bug #583968 [linux-source-2.6.32] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 
=> resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Bug #588601 [linux-source-2.6.32] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 
=> resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
> reassign 583968 linux-2.6 2.6.32-14
Bug #583968 [linux-source-2.6.32] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 
=> resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Bug #588601 [linux-source-2.6.32] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 
=> resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-source-2.6.32' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-source-2.6.32' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug #583968 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume 
from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Bug #588601 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume 
from suspend fails with KMS enabled
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-14' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-14'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-14.
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-14.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127978759227068.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#583968: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled

2010-07-22 Thread Julien Cristau

tag 583968 patch
kthxbye

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 17:15:41 -0400, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:

> When I try suspending using KMS my computer (an HP Pavilion dv5035nr laptop)
> does not resume. Furthermore I've tried logging into it remotely to obtain a
> backtrace from X with no success (following this procedure:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1228332). I'm letting NetworkManager
> handle my network interfaces, however, I also tried using dhcp directly in the
> /etc/network/interfaces file.
> 
> Unfortunately as soon as the resuming process starts (and fails) I am unable 
> to
> establish a connection the laptop (wired or wireless). On top of this, upon
> hard reboot I have no network connectivity (if managed by network manager):
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2010-March/msg00123.html
> The workaround for the last bit has been to erase the stale file and reboot.
> 
> When using UMS the resume process happens perfectly.
> I don't know how else to get a backtrace. The laptop screen is completely 
> blank
> so I can't switch to another session.
> I've marked this bug as important because suspend/hibernate are almost
> essential features in a laptop.
> 
Patch seems to be
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/48108

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#583968: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume from suspend fails with KMS enabled

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 583968 patch
Bug #583968 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume 
from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Bug #588601 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xpress 200m 5955 => resume 
from suspend fails with KMS enabled
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127979966912039.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#577640: Another oops + repost

2010-07-22 Thread Martín Ferrari

Hi again,

First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this
problem  that got kinda lost in the thread:

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:05, Martín Ferrari  wrote:

> I have just downloaded and compiled 2.6.32-2 and 2.6.34-rc5 from
> kernel.org using the .config from the debian package, and the oops is
> reproducible in both.
>
> This small C file reproduces the error every time:
>
> $ cat netnsoops.c
> #include 
> #include 
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include 
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
>        int c;
>        unsigned long flags = CLONE_NEWNET;
>
>        if(unshare(flags) == -1) {
>                perror("unshare");
>                return 1;
>        }
>        system("ip link add name FOO type veth peer name BAR");
>        system("ip link set FOO netns 1");
>        system("ip link show");
>        return 0;
> }

Secondly, I discovered another related bug, just more subtle.

I'm creating a dummy device, moving it into a name space and then
taking it back to netns 1. Later, when I delete the dummy, I get an
oops:

[  610.540091] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 0028
[  610.541512] IP: [] sysfs_find_dirent+0x9/0x2f
[  610.542369] PGD 3799d067 PUD 37bb3067 PMD 0
[  610.543370] Oops:  [#1] SMP
[  610.544018] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/net/lo/operstate
[  610.544018] CPU 0
[  610.544018] Modules linked in: dummy loop parport_pc parport
snd_pcm snd_timer tpm_tis tpm tpm_bios snd soundcore snd_page_alloc
pcspkr psmouse serio_raw i2c_piix4 evdev i2c_core button processor
ext3 jbd mbcache ide_cd_mod cdrom ide_gd_mod ata_generic ata_piix
8139too libata scsi_mod floppy piix 8139cp mii thermal thermal_sys
ide_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[  610.544018]
[  610.544018] Pid: 1359, comm: ip Tainted: GW  2.6.34-rc5 #1 /
[  610.544018] RIP: 0010:[]  []
sysfs_find_dirent+0x9/0x2f
[  610.544018] RSP: 0018:88003789f988  EFLAGS: 00010296
[  610.544018] RAX: 88003789e000 RBX:  RCX: 88007d3d2cd8
[  610.544018] RDX: 0003 RSI: 814a6352 RDI: 
[  610.544018] RBP: 814a6352 R08: 00037f80e800 R09: 88007d3d2ce8
[  610.544018] R10: 88007d3d2800 R11: 0006 R12: 814a6352
[  610.544018] R13: 88007d3d2c48 R14:  R15: 88003789fbb8
[  610.544018] FS:  7f22855f7700() GS:880001a0()
knlGS:
[  610.544018] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[  610.544018] CR2: 0028 CR3: 7d4df000 CR4: 06f0
[  610.544018] DR0:  DR1:  DR2: 
[  610.544018] DR3:  DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400
[  610.544018] Process ip (pid: 1359, threadinfo 88003789e000,
task 88007d2b69f0)
[  610.544018] Stack:
[  610.544018]  00037f80e800  
81138fbb
[  610.544018] <0> 0296 88007d3d2c38 816698d0
8113a980
[  610.544018] <0> 88007d3d2c38 88007d3d2c38 88007d3d2800

[  610.544018] Call Trace:
[  610.544018]  [] ? sysfs_get_dirent+0x24/0x43
[  610.544018]  [] ? sysfs_remove_group+0x24/0xcf
[  610.544018]  [] ? device_del+0x3b/0x1a0
[  610.544018]  [] ? rollback_registered_many+0x15d/0x1c8
[  610.544018]  [] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x1f5
[  610.544018]  [] ? unregister_netdevice_queue+0x78/0xa9
[  610.544018]  [] ? rtnl_dellink+0xb7/0xdb
[  610.544018]  [] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x34/0x7c
[  610.544018]  [] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x1f/0x25
[  610.544018]  [] ? netlink_unicast+0xe2/0x148
[  610.544018]  [] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x23f/0x252
[  610.544018]  [] ? sock_sendmsg+0x83/0x9b
[  610.544018]  [] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x10f/0x5e2
[  610.544018]  [] ? copy_from_user+0x13/0x25
[  610.544018]  [] ? verify_iovec+0x49/0x84
[  610.544018]  [] ? sys_sendmsg+0x225/0x2af
[  610.544018]  [] ? sys_recvmsg+0x48/0x56
[  610.544018]  [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[  610.544018] Code: fb 74 1a 8b 07 85 c0 75 11 be 9d 00 00 00 48 c7
c7 da 56 4b 81 e8 2b cf f0 ff f0 ff 03 48 89 d8 5b c3 55 48 89 f5 53
48 83 ec 08 <48> 8b 5f 28 eb 14 48 8b 7b 18 48 89 ee e8 46 a4 04 00 85
c0 74
[  610.544018] RIP  [] sysfs_find_dirent+0x9/0x2f
[  610.544018]  RSP 
[  610.544018] CR2: 0028
[  610.597008] ---[ end trace f92104e98ea87a47 ]---


To reproduce:

$ cat netnsoops2.c
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include 

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
   int pipefd[2];
   pid_t pid;
   unsigned long flags = CLONE_NEWNET;

   if(system("ip link add name FOO type dummy"))
   return 1;
   if(pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
   perror("pipe");
   return 1;
   }
   pid = fork();
   if(pid == -1) {
   perror("fork");
   return 1;
   }
   if(pid) {
   char buf[256];
   read(pipefd[0], buf, 1);

Bug#589945: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: NFS client hangs

2010-07-22 Thread Andrew Chittenden

Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-17
Severity: important

This looks to be a similar problem to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578152 but I cannot
post to that bug as it's been archived.

If I do this in 4 different xterm windows having cd to the same NFS
mounted directory:

xterm1: rm -rf *
xterm2: while true; do let iter+=1; echo $iter; dd if=/dev/zero 
of=$$ bs=1M count=1000; done
xterm3: while true; do let iter+=1; echo $iter; dd if=/dev/zero 
of=$$ bs=1M count=1000; done
xterm4: while true; do let iter+=1; echo $iter; dd if=/dev/zero 
of=$$ bs=1M count=1000; done

then it normally hangs before the 3rd iteration starts. The directory
contains loads of information (eg 5 linux source trees).

When it gets into this hang state, here's the packets from the client to server:

4   42.909478   172.18.0.39 10.1.6.102  TCP 1013 > nfs [SYN] Seq=0 Win=5840 
Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=108490 TSER=0 WS=0
5   42.909577   10.1.6.102  172.18.0.39 TCP nfs > 1013 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 
Win=64240 Len=0 MSS=1460
6   42.909610   172.18.0.39 10.1.6.102  TCP 1013 > nfs [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 
Win=5840 Len=0
7   42.909672   172.18.0.39 10.1.6.102  TCP 1013 > nfs [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 
Win=5840 Len=0
8   42.909767   10.1.6.102  172.18.0.39 TCP nfs > 1013 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=2 
Win=64240 Len=0
9   43.660083   10.1.6.102  172.18.0.39 TCP nfs > 1013 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=2 
Win=64240 Len=0
10  43.660100   172.18.0.39 10.1.6.102  TCP 1013 > nfs [ACK] Seq=2 Ack=2 
Win=5840 Len=0

and then repeats after a while.

IE the client starts a connection and then closes it again without
sending data.

FWIW I've found it easier to reproduce this problem if Ethernet flow
control is off but it still happens with it on as well. This happens
with different types of Ethernet hardware too. The rm -rf isn't necessary
either but makes the problem easier to reproduce (for me anyway).

The mount options are:

# mount | grep u15
sweet.dev.bluearc.com:/u15 on /u/u15 type nfs 
(rw,noatime,nodiratime,hard,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,proto=tcp,hard,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,sloppy,addr=10.1.6.102)

I've generated a stock 2.6.34.1 kernel and that also has the same
problem. We don't encounter this problem with the 2.6.26 package currently
in lenny:

# dpkg --status linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 | grep Version
Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1

As this problem is still present in 2.6.34.1, I've posted a message to
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/22/185 as well.

-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-17) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Sun Jul 11 01:44:28 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64 
root=UUID=3d1b595c-9dbc-460f-a68f-58a84e571927 ro quiet

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[7.590069] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should 
use it instead of the native driver
[7.738875]   alloc irq_desc for 16 on node 0
[7.738880]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 0
[7.738913] nouveau :03:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
[7.746000] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Detected an NV30 generation card 
(0x034200b1)
[7.746053] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from 
PROM
[8.017531] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: ... appears to be valid
[8.017686] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: BMP BIOS found
[8.017688] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: BMP version 5.39
[8.017691] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Bios version 04.34.20.27
[8.017695] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Found Display Configuration Block 
version 2.2
[8.017699] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Raw DCB entry 0: 01000300 88b8
[8.017702] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Raw DCB entry 1: 02010310 88b8
[8.017705] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Raw DCB entry 2: 01010312 
[8.017707] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Raw DCB entry 3: 02020321 0003
[8.017852] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Loading NV17 power sequencing 
microcode
[8.017856] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 0 at offset 
0xE5D9
[8.017912] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 1 at offset 
0xE7EA
[8.017932] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 2 at offset 
0xE930
[8.018024] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 3 at offset 
0xEAB6
[8.018031] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 4 at offset 
0xEAD3
[8.018040] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 5 at offset 
0xEAF0
[8.047478] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 6 at offset 
0xEC74
[8.158717] [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics memory: 2064726 kiB.
[8.158733] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: 128 MiB VRAM
[8.190630] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: 64 MiB GART (aperture)
[8.191043] mtrr: type mismatch for e000,1000 old: write-back new: 
write-combining
[8.192312] [drm] nouveau :03:04.0: Allocating FIFO number 0
[8.19

Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) resync/check implicated

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: 
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) 
> resync/check implicated"):
> > Please try 2.6.34 from experimental.
> 
> I've now replicated the problem on my coffee table with a temporary
> (intermittent) loan of an identical machine from Jump networks.
> I can get 2.6.26-21lenny4 and 2.6.26-24 to crash on demand very
> easily.  In none of the crashes do I get any kind of kernel log
> messages (eg, soft lockup warnings).
[...]

But I do see a deadlock on the barrier between resync and normal I/O, as
you suspected.  Every process is blocked in wait_barrier(),
raise_barrier() or a filesystem lock.

The only explanations I can think of are:
1. The regular I/O requests were miscounted so that the resync process
will wait forever for them to complete in raise_barrier(), while the
other processes wait forever for the barrier to be lowered.  (It seems
like the directions of this barrier are inverted.  Maybe it is really a
bollard.)
2. The wait condition of one of the waiters was met, but it wasn't
woken.
3. A thread which raised the barrier failed to lower the barrier.
4. A thread which raised the barrier caused paging.

Unfortunately I can't see any evidence for any of these.

The following patch should give us some chance of detecting cases 1 and
3.  The instructions at

 explain how to rebuild an official kernel package with a patch applied.

Ben.

--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -657,6 +657,7 @@

/* block any new IO from starting */
conf->barrier++;
+   WARN_ON(conf->barrier != 1);

/* No wait for all pending IO to complete */
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@
 {
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->resync_lock, flags);
+   WARN_ON(conf->barrier == 0);
conf->barrier--;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->resync_lock, flags);
wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
@@ -694,6 +696,7 @@
 {
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->resync_lock, flags);
+   WARN_ON(conf->nr_pending == 0);
conf->nr_pending--;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->resync_lock, flags);
wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
--- END 

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: reassign 589832 to linux-2.6

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 589832 linux-2.6
Bug #589832 [xserver-xorg-input-wacom] xserver-xorg-input-wacom: Bamboo Pen & 
Touch not supported
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-input-wacom' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xf86-input-wacom/0.10.5+20100416-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127980865327972.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589960: linux-source-2.6.34: iwlwifi-4965 firmware is no longer loaded since 2.6.34

2010-07-22 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer

Package: linux-source-2.6.34
Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal


Hi.

I'm using a custom kernel, where the IWL4965 drivers are compiled in 
statically. Also the system
uses initramfs images for booting.

Since 2.6.34, the WLAN device no longer works:
The device is correctly detected:
[1.094126] iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, 
in-tree:
[1.094347] iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation
[1.094566] iwlagn :14:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[1.094740] iwlagn :14:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
[1.094784] iwlagn :14:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN 
REV=0x4
[1.133993] iwlagn :14:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 19 802.11a 
channels
[1.134358] iwlagn :14:00.0: irq 30 for MSI/MSI-X
[1.134814] iwlagn :14:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode

however, the firmware cannot be loaded during boot:
[1.493944] iwlagn :14:00.0: request for firmware file 
'iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode' failed.
[1.494178] iwlagn :14:00.0: no suitable firmware found!
[1.494529] iwlagn :14:00.0: PCI INT A disabled

The firmware is not included in the initramfs image,.. but the strange thing 
now is:
It wasn't included in the 2.6.33 kernel initramfs either.


Has anything changed there in loding the firmwares?


Thanks,
Chris.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100722143429.5510.37659.report...@heisenberg.scientia.net

Bug#583933: Bug # 583933: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Latest radeon + KMS ASIC bug error message

2010-07-22 Thread Andres Cimmarusti

In this xorg-radeon mailing list thread below the issue was discussed and it
was stated by the developers that after patch:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/0001-drm-radeon-kms-fix-gtt-MC-base-alignment-on-rs4xx-rs.patch

The code that causes the DRM error be removed

Please patch kernel 2.6.32 in Squeeze!

Andres

--- On *Fri, 7/16/10, Jerome Glisse * wrote:

From: Jerome Glisse 
Subject: Re: DRM_ERROR("Forcing to 32M GART size (because of ASIC bug
?)\n");
To: "Alex Deucher" 
Cc: "Andres Cimmarusti" ,
xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
Date: Friday, July 16, 2010, 10:33 AM

On 07/16/2010 09:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Andres Cimmarusti
> http://us.mc507.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andrescimmaru...@yahoo.com>>
wrote:
>>
>> In the kernel: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c
>>
>> You will find this piece of code:
>>
>>  if (rdev->family == CHIP_RS400 || rdev->family == CHIP_RS480) {
>>  /* FIXME: RS400&  RS480 seems to have issue with GART
size
>>   * if 4G of system memory (needs more testing) */
>>  rdev->mc.gtt_size = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
>>  DRM_ERROR("Forcing to 32M GART size (because of ASIC bug
?)\n");
>>  }
>>
>> I don't have 4Gb of system memory (I have 2Gb DDR) so I deleted the whole
thing and compiled my kernel fine. Testing it didn't lead me to any
problems. My gtt size went from 32Mb to 512Mb. Is this ok? my card is
supposed to have 128 Mb of VRAM.
>>
>> Also if the issue is only when you are above 4Gb of system memory,
couldn't there be some sort of if statement that could probe the memory and
if it was bigger than 4G then it would force 32mb on gtt memory.?
>>
>> should I play it safe? I guess I don't really understand what gtt memory
is
>>
>
> GTT is system memory that is mapped into the video card's address
> space so it can be read from or rendered to; it's separate from vram.
> I don't recall why we added that quirk, Jerome or Dave may remember,
> but I suspect, it should be ok to remove it after this patch:
>
http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/0001-drm-radeon-kms-fix-gtt-MC-base-alignment-on-rs4xx-rs.patch
> is applied.
>
> Alex

Yes i think it should be ok to remove it after your patch.
I would like to test it but might not have the hw handy.

Cheers,
Jerome

Bug#589963: preinst fails if awk is unpacked but not configured

2010-07-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow

Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.96.1
Severity: normal

Hi,

when cdebootstraping an Ubuntu Lucid system initramfs-tools gets
installed now. The problem then is that at the point initramfs-tools
is unpacked the mawk package is unpacked but not configured. That
means the /usr/bin/awk alternative is not yet setup.

O: Selecting previously deselected package mawk.
O: dpkg: regarding .../mawk_1.3.3-15ubuntu2_amd64.deb containing mawk, 
pre-dependency problem:
O:  mawk pre-depends on libc6 (>= 2.11~20100104-0ubuntu3)
O:   libc6 is unpacked, but has never been configured.
O: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
O: Unpacking mawk (from .../mawk_1.3.3-15ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ...
P: Unpacking package mawk
D: Updating mawk to status 2
O: Selecting previously deselected package base-files.
O: dpkg: regarding .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20_amd64.deb containing 
base-files, pre-dependency problem:
O:  base-files pre-depends on awk
O:   mawk provides awk but is unpacked but not configured.
O: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
O: Unpacking base-files (from .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20_amd64.deb) ...
P: Unpacking package base-files
D: Updating base-files to status 2
...
O: Selecting previously deselected package initramfs-tools.
O: Unpacking initramfs-tools (from .../initramfs-tools_0.92bubuntu78_all.deb) ..
.
P: Unpacking package initramfs-tools
D: Updating initramfs-tools to status 2
O: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 59: 
O: awk: not found
O: 
O: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 59: 
O: awk: not found
O: 
O: dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/bootstrap/initramfs-tools_0.92bubuntu78_all.deb (--unpack):
O:  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 127


While this could be blamed on cdebootstrap I think it might be a good
idea to fix initramfs-tools. The relevant command is

  awk ' { print $1 } '

which really does not need awk. "cut" would do instead and avoid the
rather probelamtic pseudo-essential awk issue.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-xen-2010.02.18 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  cpio 2.11-4  GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  findutils4.4.2-1 utilities for finding files--find,
ii  klibc-utils  1.5.18-1small utilities built with klibc f
ii  module-init-tools3.12~pre2-3 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  udev 157-1   /dev/ and hotplug management daemo

Versions of packages initramfs-tools recommends:
ii  busybox   1:1.15.3-1 Tiny utilities for small and embed

initramfs-tools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100722151026.23132.50164.report...@frosties.localdomain

Processed: severity of 589963 is wishlist

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 589963 wishlist
Bug #589963 [initramfs-tools] preinst fails if awk is unpacked but not 
configured
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589963
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127981219426670.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589960: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.34: iwlwifi-4965 firmware is no longer loaded since 2.6.34)

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:21:57 +0100
with message-id <20100722152157.gf3...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#589960: linux-source-2.6.34: iwlwifi-4965 firmware is 
no longer loaded since 2.6.34
has caused the Debian Bug report #589960,
regarding linux-source-2.6.34: iwlwifi-4965 firmware is no longer loaded since 
2.6.34
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
589960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589960
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-source-2.6.34
Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal

Hi.

I'm using a custom kernel, where the IWL4965 drivers are compiled in 
statically. Also the system
uses initramfs images for booting.

Since 2.6.34, the WLAN device no longer works:
The device is correctly detected:
[1.094126] iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, 
in-tree:
[1.094347] iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation
[1.094566] iwlagn :14:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[1.094740] iwlagn :14:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
[1.094784] iwlagn :14:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN 
REV=0x4
[1.133993] iwlagn :14:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 19 802.11a 
channels
[1.134358] iwlagn :14:00.0: irq 30 for MSI/MSI-X
[1.134814] iwlagn :14:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode

however, the firmware cannot be loaded during boot:
[1.493944] iwlagn :14:00.0: request for firmware file 
'iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode' failed.
[1.494178] iwlagn :14:00.0: no suitable firmware found!
[1.494529] iwlagn :14:00.0: PCI INT A disabled

The firmware is not included in the initramfs image,.. but the strange thing 
now is:
It wasn't included in the 2.6.33 kernel initramfs either.

Has anything changed there in loding the firmwares?

Thanks,
Chris.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:34:29PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.34
> Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I'm using a custom kernel, where the IWL4965 drivers are compiled in 
> statically.
[...]

This is not a supported configuration.  In theory you can use
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL to make this work, but I believe that requires
that the firmware images are included in the kernel source tree.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus

--- End Message ---

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #577563 (http://bugs.debian.org/577563)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15771
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 577563 + status-NEW
Bug#577563: ahci fails to handle some 88SE6145 boards
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #545112 (http://bugs.debian.org/545112)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10935
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 545112 + status-NEW
Bug#545112: Firewire stack gets into a state where it cannot send to some 
devices
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #565797 (http://bugs.debian.org/565797)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
> usertags 565797 + status-ASSIGNED
Bug#565797: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: EXT3-fs error on sata SiI 3114 controller
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED.
> # remote status report for #566516 (http://bugs.debian.org/566516)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15772
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 566516 + status-NEW
Bug#566516: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: suspend failure in ehci_hcd
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #568207 (http://bugs.debian.org/568207)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15070
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
> usertags 568207 + status-NEEDINFO
Bug#568207: KMS does not work on 82830 CGC
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEEDINFO.
> # remote status report for #571251 (http://bugs.debian.org/571251)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14716
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
> usertags 571251 + status-NEEDINFO
Bug#571251: base: hp pavillon won't start (30% success)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEEDINFO.
> # remote status report for #571980 (http://bugs.debian.org/571980)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15638
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
> usertags 571980 + status-ASSIGNED
Bug#571980: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: Kernel oops when ipmi modules loaded 
on ibm 326m
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED.
> # remote status report for #574541 (http://bugs.debian.org/574541)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15577
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CLOSED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> CODE-FIX
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 574541 + fixed-upstream
Bug #574541 [linux-2.6] iwlwifi disconnects
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 574541 + status-CLOSED resolution-CODE-FIX
Bug#574541: iwlwifi disconnects
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-CODE-FIX status-CLOSED.
> # remote status report for #575660 (http://bugs.debian.org/575660)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15652
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 575660 + status-NEW
Bug#575660: With last kernels, terminal/console processing getting worse
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #575924 (http://bugs.debian.org/575924)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 575924 + status-NEW
Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #577555 (http://bugs.debian.org/577555)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14980
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
> usertags 577555 + status-NEEDINFO
Bug#577555: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: [athk9] Bad performance issue and 
losing easly connection with an AR9285
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEEDINFO.
> # remote status report for #577563 (http://bugs.debian.org/577563)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15771
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 577563 + status-NEW
Bug#577563: ahci fails to handle some 88SE6145 boards
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #580050 (http://bugs.debian.org/580050)
> #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15902
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 580050 + fixed-upstream
Bug #580050 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: kcryptd crashes under heavy 
I/O
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 580050 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID
Bug#580050: linux-image-2.6.3

[bts-link] source package src:linux-2.6

2010-07-22 Thread bts-link-upstream

#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #586557 (http://bugs.debian.org/586557)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16259
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 586557 + status-NEW

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100722163344.23047.31011.btsl...@merkel.debian.org

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-22 Thread bts-link-upstream

#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #577563 (http://bugs.debian.org/577563)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15771
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 577563 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #545112 (http://bugs.debian.org/545112)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10935
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 545112 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #565797 (http://bugs.debian.org/565797)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 565797 + status-ASSIGNED

# remote status report for #566516 (http://bugs.debian.org/566516)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15772
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 566516 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #568207 (http://bugs.debian.org/568207)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15070
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
usertags 568207 + status-NEEDINFO

# remote status report for #571251 (http://bugs.debian.org/571251)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14716
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
usertags 571251 + status-NEEDINFO

# remote status report for #571980 (http://bugs.debian.org/571980)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15638
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 571980 + status-ASSIGNED

# remote status report for #574541 (http://bugs.debian.org/574541)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15577
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> CLOSED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> CODE-FIX
#  * closed upstream
tags 574541 + fixed-upstream
usertags 574541 + status-CLOSED resolution-CODE-FIX

# remote status report for #575660 (http://bugs.debian.org/575660)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15652
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 575660 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #575924 (http://bugs.debian.org/575924)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 575924 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #577555 (http://bugs.debian.org/577555)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14980
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO
usertags 577555 + status-NEEDINFO

# remote status report for #577563 (http://bugs.debian.org/577563)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15771
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 577563 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #580050 (http://bugs.debian.org/580050)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15902
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID
#  * closed upstream
tags 580050 + fixed-upstream
usertags 580050 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID

# remote status report for #584724 (http://bugs.debian.org/584724)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11663
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 584724 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #584830 (http://bugs.debian.org/584830)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16153
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 584830 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #585608 (http://bugs.debian.org/585608)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16385
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 585608 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #581830 (http://bugs.debian.org/581830)
#  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28140
#  * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
usertags 581830 - status-NEW
usertags 581830 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100722163352.23047.74367.btsl...@merkel.debian.org

Bug#589960: linux-source-2.6.34: iwlwifi-4965 firmware is no longer loaded since 2.6.34

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:03:48PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi Ben.
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is not a supported configuration.  In theory you can use
> > CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL to make this work, but I believe that requires
> > that the firmware images are included in the kernel source tree.
> 
> Have you read the remaining info in the bug? I'd especially like to know
> whether it worked with 2.6.33 just to understand the boot/firmware
> loading process better.

initramfs-tools relies on module information to work out which firmware
should be included in the initramfs.  There is no way to get that
information for drivers included in a monolithic kernel.  Further, some
drivers will request firmware when probing devices, before the initramfs
has even been mounted.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100722171046.gg3...@decadent.org.uk

Bug#577640: Another oops + repost

2010-07-22 Thread Eric W. Biederman

Martín Ferrari  writes:

> Hi again,
>
> First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this
> problem  that got kinda lost in the thread:

I can't reproduce this on 2.6.35-rc1+

Can you please test a 2.6.35-rc version?  If you can still reproduce
it there can you send me your .config?  Otherwise I expect my last
round of changes to sysfs fixed whatever was the underlying problem.

Thanks,
Eric

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/m1zkxjwjq9@fess.ebiederm.org

Bug#589231: linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc: pmu_battery is not loaded automatically, so ibook battery detection does not work

2010-07-22 Thread Lino Mastrodomenico

2010/7/16 Ben Hutchings :
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 23:46 +0200, Lino Mastrodomenico wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.32-15
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> The pmu_battery module is not loaded so ibook battery detection does not work
>> (e.g. the GNOME power applet always report that the laptop is connected to 
>> the
>> AC adapter and has no battery).
>>
>> To fix the problem just do modprobe pmu_battery.
> [...]
>
> Did this work in an earlier kernel version?

I don't know, I just recently started using Debian testing on this computer.

In lenny AFAIK the pmu_battery module (and the functionality it
provides) was not available at all.

-- 
Lino Mastrodomenico



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktineohe5eoz8hgu8hfwbsvf1hunjhefchwicd...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#582281: Upstream fix

2010-07-22 Thread Stephen Powell

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:55:58 -0400 (EDT), Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> 
> A fix for this problem has been accepted for inclusion into 2.6.35-rc5. See:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=cffab6bc5511cd6f67a60bf16b62de4267b68c4c

Thanks, Peter.  I'm really busy right now, but I'll try to test this
sometime in the next few weeks.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1006577487.39581.1279823196854.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com

Bug#589989: Kernel panic after few seconds of booting

2010-07-22 Thread Luca Falavigna

Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: grave

Starting from version 2.6.32-16, linux-image-2.6.32-5-{4,6}86 produce a kernel
panic a couple of
seconds after I select an image to load. That didn't happen with 2.6.32-15.

See the attached file for kernel OOPS.



-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-15) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 root=UUID=10d31aeb-3d40-44ee-900c-
9465eee6cb17 ro quiet

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[2.707213] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[2.707542] usbhid: v2.6:USB HID core driver
[3.911735] PM: Starting manual resume from disk
[3.911751] PM: Resume from partition 8:3
[3.911756] PM: Checking hibernation image.
[3.912202] PM: Error -22 checking image file
[3.912209] PM: Resume from disk failed.
[4.015328] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
[6.165815] udev: starting version 160
[7.016297] input: PC Speaker as /devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input0
[7.123606] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
[7.190351] ACPI: I/O resource via686a [0xc00-0xc7f] conflicts with ACPI
region TSN1 [0xc20-0xc20]
[7.190430] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should
use it instead of the native driver
[7.208377] input: Power Button as
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0C:00/input/input1
[7.208407] ACPI: Power Button [PWRB]
[7.212203] input: Sleep Button as
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0E:00/input/input2
[7.212245] ACPI: Sleep Button [SLPB]
[7.212807] input: Power Button as
/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3
[7.212820] ACPI: Power Button [PWRF]
[7.277583] processor LNXCPU:00: registered as cooling_device0
[7.433435] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
[7.454012] parport_pc: VIA 686A/8231 detected
[7.454021] parport_pc: probing current configuration
[7.454048] parport_pc: Current parallel port base: 0x378
[7.454150] parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7 [PCSPP,TRISTATE]
[7.541561] parport_pc: VIA parallel port: io=0x378, irq=7
[7.589075] input: Logitech USB Receiver as
/devices/pci:00/:00:07.2/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/input/input4
[7.589785] logitech 0003:046D:C517.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10
Keyboard [Logitech USB Receiver] on usb-:00:07.2-2/input0
[7.617529] logitech 0003:046D:C517.0002: fixing up Logitech keyboard report
descriptor
[7.645608] input: Logitech USB Receiver as
/devices/pci:00/:00:07.2/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.1/input/input5
[7.653071] logitech 0003:046D:C517.0002: input,hiddev0,hidraw1: USB HID
v1.10 Mouse [Logitech USB Receiver] on usb-:00:07.2-2/input1
[8.073373] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[8.684266] nouveau :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LNKA] -> GSI 11 (level,
low) -> IRQ 11
[8.704974] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Detected an NV20 generation card
(0x02a5)
[8.705358] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from
PROM
[8.831794] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: ... appears to be valid
[8.832387] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: BMP BIOS found
[8.832395] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: BMP version 5.20
[8.832405] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Bios version 03.20.00.10
[8.832416] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Found Display Configuration Block
version 1.4
[8.832425] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: No useful information in BIOS output
table; adding all possible outputs
[8.832435] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Probing TV encoders on I2C bus: 1
[8.872577] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: No TV encoders found.
[8.873225] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 0 at offset
0xA486
[8.873251] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 1 at offset
0xAAD7
[8.873267] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 2 at offset
0xA4A1
[8.873297] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 3 at offset
0xAA7E
[8.873314] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 4 at offset
0xA525
[8.873324] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 5 at offset
0xA62F
[8.960072] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 6 at offset
0xA54E
[8.960113] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Parsing VBIOS init table 7 at offset
0xA5CA
[8.979152] [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics memory: 322154 kiB.
[8.979191] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: 64 MiB VRAM
[8.979383] agpgart-via :00:00.0: AGP 2.0 bridge
[8.979417] agpgart-via :00:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode
[8.979476] nouveau :01:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode
[8.979486] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: 64 MiB GART (aperture)
[8.980202] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Allocating FIFO number 0
[8.983420] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: nouveau_channel_alloc: initial

Processed: found 589989 in

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 589989
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #589989 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798253091103.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: found 589989 in 2.6.32-16

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 589989 2.6.32-16
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-16' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-16'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-16.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798253341345.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: found 589989 in 2.6.32-16, notfound 589989 in 2.6.32-15

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 589989 2.6.32-16
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-16' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-16'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #589989 to the same values 
previously set
> notfound 589989 2.6.32-15
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-15' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-15'
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-15.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798253351369.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: severity of 589989 is important

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 589989 important
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798294348750.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589996: Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed on update

2010-07-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow

Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-17
Severity: important

Hi,

in the linux-image packages there is now a dependency chain from
linux-image-2.6... -> linux-base -> libapt-pkg-perl ->
libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. Which is the virtual package provided by apt
to signal the ABI of its library and binary caches. In effect the
kernels are locked to a specific ABI version of apt. The problem is
that the ABI changes from time to time and every time it does an
update of apt will now remove the kernel for the duration of the
transition. For an example try installing apt from experimental.

Well, that is life you might say. That is what is called a library
transition.

But here comes the insane part. The 1637 line long perl postinst
script of linux-base only depends on apt because of this code at the
end:

sub compare_versions {
return $AptPkg::Config::_config->system->versioning->compare(@_);
}

if ($ARGV[0] eq 'reconfigure' || defined($ENV{DEBCONF_RECONFIGURE}) ||
(!is_fresh_installation() &&
 compare_versions($ARGV[1], $libata_transition_ver) < 0)) {
DebianKernel::DiskId::transition();
}


Could I suggest replacing this with a call to

  system('dpkg', '--compare-versions', $ARGV[1], '>>', $libata_transition_ver)

That way the dependency on apt can be droped completly.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-xen-2010.02.18 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libuuid-perl  0.02-3+b1  Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii  udev  157-1  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  util-linux2.17.2-3   Miscellaneous system utilities

linux-base recommends no packages.

linux-base suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100722201936.29008.4321.report...@frosties.localdomain

Processed: notfound 589989 in 2.6.32-15, found 589989 in 2.6.32-16

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> notfound 589989 2.6.32-15
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-15' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-15'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #589989 to the same values 
previously set
> found 589989 2.6.32-16
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-16' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-16'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #589989 to the same values 
previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798330134248.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: severity of 589989 is important

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 589989 important
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 589989 to the same value.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798330144280.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589989: Kernel panic after few seconds of booting

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:53:32PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-15
> Severity: grave
> 
> Starting from version 2.6.32-16, linux-image-2.6.32-5-{4,6}86 produce a kernel
> panic a couple of
> seconds after I select an image to load. That didn't happen with 2.6.32-15.
> 
> See the attached file for kernel OOPS.
[...]
> [1.944984] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at e894f13c
> [1.948014] IP: [] window_set+0x6/0x2e [3c59x]
> [1.948014] *pde = 278ac067 *pte = 
> [1.948014] Oops:  [#1]
> [1.948014] last sysfs file: 
> /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A03:00/device:00/PNP0700:00/uevent
> [1.948014] Modules linked in: ehci_hcd(+) 3c59x(+) floppy(+) thermal_sys 
> usbcore nls_base scsi_mod mii
> [1.948014]
> [1.948014] Pid: 64, comm: modprobe Not tainted (2.6.32-5-486 #1)
> [1.948014] EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 00010086 CPU: 0
> [1.948014] EIP is at window_set+0x6/0x2e [3c59x]
> [1.948014] EAX: e894ef80 EBX: 0004 ECX: 0004 EDX: 0004
> [1.948014] ESI: e894ef80 EDI: 0286 EBP: 0006 ESP: e5d89d44
> [1.948014]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS:  GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
> [1.948014] Process modprobe (pid: 64, ti=e5d88000 task=e5d2b0c0 
> task.ti=e5d88000)
> [1.948014] Stack:
> [1.948014]  0008 e894ef80 e891212d 0282 e894ef80 001f 
>  0005
> [1.948014] <0> e891231b 0008 e5cadb60 0001 e8915715 c12bd2f4 
> e894ef80 e5cadb68
> [1.948014] <0> e5cad800  e8917914 e7857660 e789c800  
> 0050 da43
> [1.948014] Call Trace:
> [1.948014]  [] ? window_write16+0x26/0x44 [3c59x]
[...]

This regression is presumably due to the fix for bug #586967.  I'll try
to decode this oops and work out what I've done wrong.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100722212448.gh3...@decadent.org.uk

Bug#589996: Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed on update

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 22:19 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: linux-base
> Version: 2.6.32-17
> Severity: important
> 
> Hi,
> 
> in the linux-image packages there is now a dependency chain from
> linux-image-2.6... -> linux-base -> libapt-pkg-perl ->
> libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. Which is the virtual package provided by apt
> to signal the ABI of its library and binary caches. In effect the
> kernels are locked to a specific ABI version of apt. The problem is
> that the ABI changes from time to time and every time it does an
> update of apt will now remove the kernel for the duration of the
> transition. For an example try installing apt from experimental.
> 
> Well, that is life you might say. That is what is called a library
> transition.
> 
> But here comes the insane part. The 1637 line long perl postinst
> script of linux-base only depends on apt because of this code at the
> end:
[...]

What's really insane is that we don't have a nice and stable library to
do this and instead I have to fork every time I want to compare two
strings.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: severity of 589996 is normal

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 589996 normal
Bug #589996 [linux-base] Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed 
on update
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12798416823574.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: tagging 589989

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 589989 + pending
Bug #589989 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic after few seconds of booting
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127984347414466.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589989: [PATCH net-next-2.6] 3c59x: Fix call to mdio_sync() with the wrong argument

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

commit a095cfc40ec7ebe63e9532383c5b5c2a27b14075
"3c59x: Specify window explicitly for access to windowed registers"
changed the first parameter to mdio_sync(), from a pointer to the
register mapping, to a pointer to the vortex_private structure,
and changed all but one of the call sites.  Fix that last one.

Reported-by: Luca Falavigna 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
---
 drivers/net/3c59x.c |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
index 069a03f..b124283 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static int __devinit vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev,
mii_preamble_required++;
if (vp->drv_flags & EXTRA_PREAMBLE)
mii_preamble_required++;
-   mdio_sync(ioaddr, 32);
+   mdio_sync(vp, 32);
mdio_read(dev, 24, MII_BMSR);
for (phy = 0; phy < 32 && phy_idx < 1; phy++) {
int mii_status, phyx;
-- 
1.7.1





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279844308.4883.365.ca...@localhost

Bug#590022: lilo: Needs to install kernel and initramfs update hooks

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.8-8.1
Severity: serious

lilo can no longer rely on explicit support from kernel packages or
initramfs-tools, and must install hook scripts.  The policy for these
is documented in:

http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lilo depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.33  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.11.2-2Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1   2:1.02.48-2 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  mbr  1.1.10-2Master Boot Record for IBM-PC comp

lilo recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lilo suggests:
pn  lilo-doc   (no description available)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723002653.16534.94290.report...@localhost

Bug#590023: elilo: Needs to install kernel and initramfs update hooks

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

Package: elilo
Version: 3.12-3
Severity: serious

elilo can no longer rely on explicit support from kernel packages or
initramfs-tools, and must install hook scripts.  The policy for these
is documented in:

http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723002851.16879.67063.report...@localhost

Bug#590024: arcboot: Needs to install kernel update hooks

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

Package: arcboot
Version: 0.3.13
Severity: serious

arcboot can no longer rely on explicit support from kernel packages,
and must install hook scripts.  The policy for these is documented in:

http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723003041.16932.35489.report...@localhost

Bug#590028: zipl: Needs to install kernel and initramfs update hooks

2010-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings

Package: s390-tools
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: serious

zipl can no longer rely on explicit support from kernel packages or
initramfs-tools, and must install hook scripts.  The policy for these
is documented in:

http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723003914.17403.42701.report...@localhost

Processed: tagging 589231

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 589231 - moreinfo
Bug #589231 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc: pmu_battery is not loaded 
automatically, so ibook battery detection does not work
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127985538223043.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: closing 588287

2010-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> close 588287 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
Bug#588287: linux-image-2.6.34-1-686: Heavy disk activity triggers a 
warn_slowpath_common at fs-writeback.c:589
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.34-1~experimental.2, send any further 
explanations to GSR 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
588287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127985558524180.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#589231:

2010-07-22 Thread Onkar Shinde

The pmu_battery module was not built in kernels < 2.32 in Debian.

gnome-power-manager previously used some different methods for battery
detection. So it didn't depend on presence of pmu_battery. IIRC, the
problem started showing up since gnome-power-manager version 2.28. Now
it can not detect battery if the pmu_battery module is not loaded.

Cheers,
Onkar
-- 
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinriejnrnjqutijhh9mkiebsk0rtjpjpg7ru...@mail.gmail.com

39 matches

Mail list logo