Re: [PATCHv2] Nuke a few easily Lintian warnings
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 05:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 19:14 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:41 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I happened to notice on packages.qa.debian.org that the kernel packages have 250 lintian warnings, of which the vast majority come from just a few easy to fix issues. Patch rebased on trunk with comments addressed. Since this steps outside of the areas where I feel comfortable committing of my own accord I'd quite like an ACK on these changes (if they are appropriate). ACK, except for: Thanks. Committed with the omission of the no-debonf-config override for linux-base. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Indecision is the basis of flexibility -- button at a Science Fiction convention. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#593793: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000041 (__d_lookup+0xb5/0xd3)
On 08/21/2010 05:03 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Unless this is reproducible, there is little we can do with this information. Ok, so from now on, I'll only report BUGs which have occurred more than once. However, if you want to record oops messages to help developers spot patterns, please install the 'kerneloops' package. I have that installed already. Cheers, Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6f8a0b.5080...@googlemail.com
Bug#593792: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffd17c8c (do_vfs_ioctl)
On 08/21/2010 05:19 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: The kernel image in the above package contains this machine code around the address of the faulting instruction: [...] Notice that several bytes around the faulting instruction (8b) differ from this in the recorded 'oops'. This indicates memory or filesystem corruption, possibly due to a hardware fault. You should check the integrity of the package on disk using debsums, and you can check the system RAM with memtest86+. Many thanks Ben! I've been suspecting something along these lines, but that's the best evidence I've got up to now. (I've been running memtest86 for 19h without any errors. debsums gives no errors.) Cheers, Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6f8cb6.6070...@googlemail.com
Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 05:04:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Somehow I didn't notice earlier that this is an alignment check and not a seg-fault or similar. Alignment checks are normally disabled on x86. This may well be a bug in the hypervisor. The hypervisor cleans the AC bit before the normal entry into the kernel. This fix was introduced somewhere between Xen 3.0 and 3.1. Maybe there is another path, that is unfixed. Or the OP uses Xen 3.0, which may be unfixed. Bastian -- I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose. -- Spock, The Squire of Gothos, stardate 2124.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821083630.gb...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:16:02PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: 1) boot debian under xen check 2) sudo aptitude install oprofile gdb check 3) sudo opcontrol --init --no-vmlinux | Option --setup not valid with --init. opcontrol --no-vmlinux works 4) sudo opcontrol --start | Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface. | Using log file /var/lib/oprofile/samples/oprofiled.log | Daemon started. | Profiler running. 5) gdb /bin/true 6) type break main and enter 7) type y and enter 8) type run and enter I see this also on a Xen 3.2 from Lenny: | oprofile: using timer interrupt. | alignment check: [#1] SMP | last sysfs file: /sys/module/dm_mod/initstate | CPU 1 | Modules linked in: oprofile evdev snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc pcspkr ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod btrfs zlib_deflate crc32c libcrc32c xen_netfront xen_blkfront | Pid: 1, comm: gdb Not tainted 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 #1 / | RIP: e030:[a0165c42] [a0165c42] sync_buffer+0xa3/0x405 [oprofile] | RSP: e02b:880060321be8 EFLAGS: 00250286 | RAX: 8800937b4c9c RBX: 8800937b4c9c RCX: 0006 | RDX: 8100603f RSI: RDI: 8800937b4c98 | RBP: R08: R09: 8800fd914af0 | R10: 8100603f R11: 8800fd914af0 R12: | R13: R14: 0001 R15: | FS: 7f101e69b700() GS:880003d64000() knlGS: | CS: e033 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b | CR2: 7f101e69b9d0 CR3: 6020f000 CR4: 0660 | DR0: DR1: DR2: | DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 | Process gdb (pid: 1, threadinfo 88006032, task 8800fd912210) | Stack: | 0006 880003d6f1e0 0001 0015 | 0 8800937b4c98 8800937b4c9c 0001 8800937b4cac | 0 8800fd912210 8800fd914af0 8800fd912210 | Call Trace: | [a0165fb5] ? task_exit_notify+0x11/0x16 [oprofile] | [81303b5d] ? notifier_call_chain+0x2e/0x5b | [8105f5e3] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x63 | [810476f9] ? do_exit+0x22/0x70d | [81047e5e] ? do_group_exit+0x7a/0xa4 | [813007c5] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x7/0x22 | [810546ce] ? get_signal_to_deliver+0x357/0x379 | [81007f03] ? do_signal+0x6c/0x68b | [8100603f] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1 | [81300eb5] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30 | [813010ea] ? error_exit+0x2a/0x60 | [81300c1d] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6 | [81008547] ? do_notify_resume+0x25/0x67 | [810407e3] ? schedule_tail+0x57/0x59 | [81008c90] ? int_signal+0x12/0x17 | Code: c7 44 24 14 01 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 18 e9 e8 02 00 00 48 8d 7c 24 20 44 89 f6 e8 54 f6 ff ff 48 85 c0 48 89 c3 0f 84 dd 02 00 00 48 8b 38 48 83 ff ff 0f 85 2c 02 00 00 48 8b 58 08 f6 c3 04 74 | RIP [a0165c42] sync_buffer+0xa3/0x405 [oprofile] | RSP 880060321be8 | ---[ end trace db6fd061b9be07d3 ]--- Which register shows the address of the unalligned access? Bastian -- You! What PLANET is this! -- McCoy, The City on the Edge of Forever, stardate 3134.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821085335.gc...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#583949:
tags 583949 + squeeze sid thanks Hi, Has there been any update on this issue ? I can reproduce it here. Using: Linux mybox 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 08:42:31 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux when I insert a CD-R , dmesg shows: [ 3215.932055] CE: hpet increasing min_delta_ns to 22500 nsec [ 3224.224047] CE: hpet increasing min_delta_ns to 33750 nsec [ 3247.464319] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code [ 3247.464327] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 3247.464336] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [ 3247.464345] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Timeout on logical unit [ 3247.464355] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 01 87 68 00 00 01 00 [ 3247.464374] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 400800 [ 3247.464384] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 100200 [ 3253.942573] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code [ 3253.942581] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 3253.942590] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [ 3253.942599] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Timeout on logical unit [ 3253.942610] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 01 87 68 00 00 01 00 [ 3253.942628] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 400800 [ 3253.942638] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 100200 [ 3260.420680] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code [ 3260.420688] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 3260.420696] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [ 3260.420705] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Timeout on logical unit [ 3260.420716] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 01 87 68 00 00 01 00 [ 3260.420735] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 400800 [ 3260.420745] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 100200 DVD-R are fine . I can mount the cdrom manually doing: sudo mount /dev/cdrom /tmp/cdrom [ 3578.447634] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 100200 [ 3584.925386] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code [ 3584.925394] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 3584.925403] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [ 3584.925412] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Timeout on logical unit [ 3584.925423] sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 01 87 68 00 00 01 00 [ 3584.925441] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 400800 [ 3584.925450] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 100200 [ 3585.495263] ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A What looks surprising is that my fstab shows: /dev/cdrom1/media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 while $ ls -al /dev/cdrom* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2010-08-21 10:42 /dev/cdrom - sr0 I am not sure why there is a trailing '1' in my fstab (maybe during the kernel update / udev update with uuid stuff) Anyhow the bug can be seen on a DELL Precision M6300 / amd64 with a drive: [2.448406] ata1.00: ATAPI: TSSTcorp DVD+/-RW TS-L632H, D400, max UDMA/33 [2.480325] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33 [2.488411] scsi 0:0:0:0: CD-ROMTSSTcorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H D400 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 I could also find some reference on other distribution such as mandriva: Bug 52806 - CD-ROM media are not detected automatically https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=52806 Thanks ! -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=fbpm8qtx6me2zaedyxu8qz6z30lon_5_5i...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 583949 + squeeze sid Bug #583949 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] 2.6.32-3-amd64 can't read DVDs/CDs (sometimes) Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 583949: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583949 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1282381254416.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: Which register shows the address of the unalligned access? (The following numbers apply to my original 2.6.32-18 crash) dpg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84occw72st@sauna.l.org
Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
Which register shows the address of the unalligned access?
The RIP register.
(The following numbers apply to my 2.6.32-18 only:)
$ objdump -axdt
/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/arch/x86/oprofile/oprofile.ko|grep
sync_buffer
0b63 sync_buffer:
shows that sync_buffer is at 0xb63 so sync_buffer+0xae = 0xc11
which looks like
bf2: e9 e3 02 00 00 jmpq eda sync_buffer+0x377
bf7: 8b 74 24 0c mov0xc(%rsp),%esi
bfb: 48 8d 7c 24 20 lea0x20(%rsp),%rdi
c00: e8 00 00 00 00 callq c05 sync_buffer+0xa2
c01: R_X86_64_PC32
op_cpu_buffer_read_entry+0xfffc
c05: 48 85 c0test %rax,%rax
c08: 48 89 c5mov%rax,%rbp
c0b: 0f 84 d8 02 00 00 je ee9 sync_buffer+0x386
-- c11: 48 8b 38mov(%rax),%rdi --
c14: 48 83 ff ff cmp$0x,%rdi
c18: 0f 85 2a 02 00 00 jnee48 sync_buffer+0x2e5
c1e: 48 8b 58 08 mov0x8(%rax),%rbx
c22: f6 c3 04test $0x4,%bl
c25: 74 12 je c39 sync_buffer+0xd6
c27: e8 00 00 00 00 callq c2c sync_buffer+0xc9
c28: R_X86_64_PC32
add_event_entry+0xfffc
and matches contents of the Code: line.
The C code in question is
sample = op_cpu_buffer_read_entry(entry, cpu);
if (!sample)
break;
if (is_code(sample-eip)) {
where sample stored in %rax and seems to contain 0x88003cc9d36c
which is indeed not aligned to sizeof(void*) == 8. According to
http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/OProfileTutorial.txt
oprofile does enable the flag(s?) that generates interrupts if
unaligned acceses are made so that it can collect statistics.
1) Is oprofile supposed to keep that flag enabled also when executing
kernel code?
2) If yes, why is it not handled?
3) If no, why is the flag set?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/844oeowclt@sauna.l.org
Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs.
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system New version of kernal installed 20Aug2010. Tried booting this AM. The new kernal could not have been tested with Lilo. I cannot use GRUB as it corrupts its own boot stage 1.5 in a system crash or sometimes after /sbin/halt. N.B. my e-mail address is now: jmd...@btinternet.com John Hunter -- Package-specific info: ** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached ** Model information not available ** Network interface configuration: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback address 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.13 netmask 255.255.254.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1 dns-search greenwood ** PCI devices: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller [8086:29c0] (rev 02) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR+ INTx- Latency: 0 Capabilities: access denied Kernel modules: intel-agp 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express PCI Express Root Port [8086:29c1] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: b000-bfff Memory behind bridge: fa00-fe8f Prefetchable memory behind bridge: d000-dfff Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 4: I/O ports at ac00 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 21 Region 4: I/O ports at a880 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 18 Region 0: Memory at f9fffc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:293e] (rev 02) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR-
Bug#591073: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend-to-RAM regression -- Possible solution
An update to this report which might help with the solution: While the old system based on Kernel package version 2.6.32-3 worked, I've experienced graphics slowdowns after resume. Just today I've come across #587722 which seems to be related. It hints at installing firmware-linux. Its dependency linux-firmware-free was already installed, but firmware-linux-nonfree was not yet present. When I installed it, I've experienced the same issue as Pietro, the submitter of #587722, namely that Kernel 2.6.32-3 doesn't resume at all anymore. However, with the newer kernel packages and in particular 2.6.35-trunk the resume works flawlessly now after several tries, and on top of it it also fixes the slowdown issue after resume. Therefore, in summary, Kernel 2.6.35 + firmware-linux-nonfree is the best combination for my system. Now I guess the next step is to find out if the non- free part is really needed. If my observations are correct, it might make sense to retitle the report accordingly. I will also add a note to #587722. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201008211318.52046.2...@kuarepoti-dju.net
Processed: bug 592415 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 592415 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29413 Bug #592415 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: invisible mouse under GDM and GNOME Bug #592955 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: Canât see mouse pointer in X Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29413'. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29413'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 592415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592415 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128239629327627.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#593747: [linux-2.6] standy issue with my laptop Dell Latitude D630
Le 20/08/2010 19:55, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:34:21PM +0200, Guy Roussin wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Since upgrade to 2.6.32-20 (i think 2.6.32-19 is safe) my laptop do not wakeup in standby mode (blank screen). I need to press 5 seconds the power button to restart. Downgrade to squeeze linux-image version 2.6.32-18 and now all is fine again. My laptop is Dell Latitude D630. I use proprietary video nvidia driver (*) Can you reproduce this if you don't use the nvidia driver? I remove all nvidia stuff (all packages related to nvidia) upgrade to linux-image-2.6-686 version 2.6.32-20, install xserver-xorg-video-all and use 'nouveau' driver. I try the standby mode 4 or 5 times with success. 2-6-32-18 + nvidia = ok 2-6-32-20 + nvidia = not ok 2-6-32-20 + nouveau = ok I can make other tests if necessary, Thank you Ben. Guy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6fe201.7080...@teledetection.fr
Bug#591073: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend-to-RAM regression -- Possible solution
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 13:18 +0200, Josef Spillner wrote: An update to this report which might help with the solution: While the old system based on Kernel package version 2.6.32-3 worked, I've experienced graphics slowdowns after resume. Just today I've come across #587722 which seems to be related. It hints at installing firmware-linux. Its dependency linux-firmware-free was already installed, but firmware-linux-nonfree was not yet present. [...] ATI/AMD Radeon GPUs require some microcode for 3D acceleration, which is loaded by the radeon driver and is packaged in firmware-linux-nonfree. However, following Debian policy the kernel packages do not depend on or recommend this package. All other functionality of the radeon driver (including suspend/resume) should be available without the 3D microcode installed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 591073
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 591073 - moreinfo Bug #591073 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend-to-RAM regression Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 591073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128240523029965.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 593826
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 593826 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #593826 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12824058602718.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs.
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 12:09 +0100, John Hunter wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system New version of kernal installed 20Aug2010. Tried booting this AM. The new kernal could not have been tested with Lilo. Works for me. Please send the contents of /etc/kernel-img.conf. I cannot use GRUB as it corrupts its own boot stage 1.5 in a system crash or sometimes after /sbin/halt. That sounds like a hardware problem to me. Do you have both lilo and grub packages installed? N.B. my e-mail address is now: jmd...@btinternet.com [...] Then you should put that address in ~/.reportbugrc. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: severity of 593826 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 593826 important Bug #593826 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128240690710631.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: submitter 593826
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 593826 jmd...@btinternet.com Bug #593826 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. Changed Bug submitter to 'jmd...@btinternet.com' from 'John Hunter j...@johnhunter0.orangehome.co.uk' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12824066988922.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 593793
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 593793 + unreproducible Bug #593793 [linux-2.6] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0041 (__d_lookup+0xb5/0xd3) Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128240726913482.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#576408: looks like acpi_enforce_resources again
I'm no expert on kernel matters, but this looks like another instance of someone being affected by the relatively recent change in upstream kernel policy toward ACPI resource overlaps. Possibly adding this to the kernel boot parameters would help: acpi_enforce_resources=lax HTH, Dave W. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c7020a1.3090...@sbcglobal.net
race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss
clone 593516 -1 reassign -1 linux-2.6 retitle -1 linux-2.6: race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss severity -1 serious thanks Hi kernel team, This bug was originally reported as #593516. The schroot program reads /proc/mounts to determine which filesystems to umount as it cleans up after itself. However, if more that one instance is running then if one process reads /proc/mounts while another instance is umounting filesystems then things get a bit screwy: the reader can miss mount entries and as a result could purge entire filesystems under the mistaken assumption that they are no longer mounted. This is not specific to schroot: the problem could occur if any process is mounting/umounting filesystems as another is reading /proc/mounts. In the case of schroot, we use /proc/mounts to umount all filesystems under a given path prior to running rm -r on that path, so there's the potential for serious dataloss if an entry in /proc/mounts gets skipped as a result of this issue. Since we examine the contents of /proc/mounts as a sanity-check, and /proc/mounts is unreliable, it means that our sanity-checking is equally unreliable... I'm not aware of the specifics of how /proc/mounts is implemented, but I think this could be made reliable if the contents were not changed once opened (i.e. each reader gets a unique immutable copy rather than a mutable global copy that's subject to spurious changes). Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 593516 -1 Bug#593516: schroot: race condition in /proc/mounts can break cleanup Bug 593516 cloned as bug 593883. reassign -1 linux-2.6 Bug #593883 [schroot] schroot: race condition in /proc/mounts can break cleanup Bug reassigned from package 'schroot' to 'linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions schroot/1.3.2-1. retitle -1 linux-2.6: race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss Bug #593883 [linux-2.6] schroot: race condition in /proc/mounts can break cleanup Changed Bug title to 'linux-2.6: race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss' from 'schroot: race condition in /proc/mounts can break cleanup' severity -1 serious Bug #593883 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: race reading /proc/mounts causes umount failure and potential for serious dataloss Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593883 593516: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593516 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12824236184371.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Graphics driver fixes for squeeze kernel-xen ?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Please send such mails to the maintainer of the package, not me. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:55:33PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Is there a plan to update the dom0-capable kernel to the latest version from xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch? On the way. Oh, kernel update form xen/stable-2.6.32.x will bring Xen PV-on-HVM drivers aswell.. Allowing fully virtualized (Xen HVM) guests use paravirtualized disk/net devices and perform much better. Those drivers are also merged to upstream kernel.org 2.6.36. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821205246.gy2...@reaktio.net
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Graphics driver fixes for squeeze kernel-xen ?
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 23:52 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Please send such mails to the maintainer of the package, not me. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:55:33PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Is there a plan to update the dom0-capable kernel to the latest version from xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch? On the way. Oh, kernel update form xen/stable-2.6.32.x will bring Xen PV-on-HVM drivers aswell.. These drivers have also been backported to the regular 2.6.32 flavour for Squeeze so you won't need the Xen flavour to get this functionality. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Pilfering Treasury property is paticularly dangerous: big thieves are ruthless in punishing little thieves. -- Diogenes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Graphics driver fixes for squeeze kernel-xen ?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 23:52 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Please send such mails to the maintainer of the package, not me. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:55:33PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Is there a plan to update the dom0-capable kernel to the latest version from xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch? On the way. Oh, kernel update form xen/stable-2.6.32.x will bring Xen PV-on-HVM drivers aswell.. These drivers have also been backported to the regular 2.6.32 flavour for Squeeze so you won't need the Xen flavour to get this functionality. Oh nice! Thanks. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821221620.gz2...@reaktio.net
Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs.
Forwarded Message From: JOHN HUNTER jmd...@btinternet.com To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:08:43 + (GMT) Hi Ben, Answers embedded. It would when one installs dear old lilo, the script needs to check for the presence of GRUB and adjust some config files? What should /etc/kernal-img.conf look like with lilo/ Regards, John --- On Sat, 21/8/10, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. To: jmd...@btinternet.com, 593...@bugs.debian.org Date: Saturday, 21 August, 2010, 15:56 On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 12:09 +0100, John Hunter wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system New version of kernal installed 20Aug2010. Tried booting this AM. The new kernal could not have been tested with Lilo. Works for me. Please send the contents of /etc/kernel-img.conf. ## # Kernel image management overrides # See kernel-img.conf(5) for details do_symlinks = yes relative_links = yes do_bootloader = no do_bootfloppy = no do_initrd = yes link_in_boot = no postinst_hook = update-grub postrm_hook = update-grub I cannot use GRUB as it corrupts its own boot stage 1.5 in a system crash or sometimes after /sbin/halt. That sounds like a hardware problem to me. Do you have both lilo and grub packages installed? ## yes. N.B. my e-mail address is now: jmd...@btinternet.com [...] Then you should put that address in ~/.reportbugrc. ## Thanks, fixed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282441328.12956.25.ca...@localhost
Bug#593826: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs.)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Aug 2010 02:40:46 +0100 with message-id 1282441246.12956.24.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#593826: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. has caused the Debian Bug report #593826, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Lilo reports kernal stack overlap on boot then hangs. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 593826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system New version of kernal installed 20Aug2010. Tried booting this AM. The new kernal could not have been tested with Lilo. I cannot use GRUB as it corrupts its own boot stage 1.5 in a system crash or sometimes after /sbin/halt. N.B. my e-mail address is now: jmd...@btinternet.com John Hunter -- Package-specific info: ** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached ** Model information not available ** Network interface configuration: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback address 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.13 netmask 255.255.254.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1 dns-search greenwood ** PCI devices: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller [8086:29c0] (rev 02) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR+ INTx- Latency: 0 Capabilities: access denied Kernel modules: intel-agp 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express PCI Express Root Port [8086:29c1] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: b000-bfff Memory behind bridge: fa00-fe8f Prefetchable memory behind bridge: d000-dfff Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 4: I/O ports at ac00 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7357] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 21 Region 4: I/O ports at a880 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 02) (prog-if
