Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Meskes
 I had to rebuild both -guest-kms and -ose modules, which implies that
 there's not a safe upgrade path for vbox when ABI changes as it is
 currently. Quite bad, because the näive user needs to manually recover
 things more than expected.

Well there is. If this really was an ABI change the kernel version number
should have changed ttbomk which then would have easily told you to rebuild.
After all there would have been no modules for that new kernel.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004130943.ga25...@hyperion.credativ.de



Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:02:32PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
  On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  I would also be interested in the watchdog support for the same
  chip,
  
  That patch does *not* add watchdog support for the Fintek F71889FG
  chip, it *only* adds support for the F71808E and the F71882FG.
  
  Oops.
  
  Additionally a patch for the F71862FG is currently pending review and
  inclusion.
  
  That being said, this driver should be fairly easy to expand to
  include support for the F71889FG chip (AFAIK only pin-configuration
  should be added, which probably is just a datasheet-reading
  exercise).  Adding support however would be something I'd suggest
  doing across the LKML *first*, then (optionally) backport it later.
  
  However, the last patch (729d273aa7c86eb1406ade4eadf249cff188bf9a)
  doesn't look right; surely it should be using the new
  request_muxed_region() macro too?
  
  IIRC that patch was submitted and applied *before* 8b6d043, hence
  request_muxed_region() wasn't available and thus not used.
  
  The patch to make use of request_muxed_region() [1] has been acked [2]
  but not yet applied yet, I've just sent out a poke-mail (CC-ed to this
  bug) with the request for it to be committed.
  
  [1] 1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu
  
  AFAICS, this id refers to the patch that ended in 
  96cb4eb019ce3185ec0d946a74b5a2202f5067c9.
 
 I can't find that commit in Torvald's tree.  Who's the author and what's
 the first line of the commit message?

commit 96cb4eb019ce3185ec0d946a74b5a2202f5067c9
Author: Giel van Schijndel m...@mortis.eu
Date:   Sun Aug 1 15:30:55 2010 +0200

watchdog: f71808e_wdt: new watchdog driver for Fintek F71808E and F71882FG

In Linus' tree.
$ git describe --contains 96cb4eb019ce3185ec0d946a74b5a2202f5067c9
v2.6.36-rc1~290^2~2

  The one you are referring to must be
  http://marc.info/?l=lm-sensorsm=127219192018988w=2
 
 Actually I'm referring to this patch (updated/rebased version of the one
 you're referring to):
 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=128066949410960w=2
 
 PS marc.info allows direct searching on Message-ID like so:
http://marc.info/?i=$message_id
 e.g.:
http://marc.info/?i=1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu

Interestingly, I found this with your message-id:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116315/

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004064033.ga4...@glandium.org



Bug#597820: [PATCH] watchdog: f71808e_wdt: add support for the F71889FG

2010-10-04 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Signed-off-by: Giel van Schijndel m...@mortis.eu
---
 drivers/watchdog/Kconfig   |4 ++--
 drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c |   10 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
index 24efd8e..0fcbb87 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
@@ -409,11 +409,11 @@ config ALIM7101_WDT
  Most people will say N.
 
 config F71808E_WDT
-   tristate Fintek F71808E and F71882FG Watchdog
+   tristate Fintek F71808E, F71882FG and F71889FG Watchdog
depends on X86  EXPERIMENTAL
help
  This is the driver for the hardware watchdog on the Fintek
- F71808E and F71882FG Super I/O controllers.
+ F71808E, F71882FG and F71889FG Super I/O controllers.
 
  You can compile this driver directly into the kernel, or use
  it as a module.  The module will be called f71808e_wdt.
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
index 7e5c266..65e5796 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
@@ -308,6 +308,12 @@ static int watchdog_start(void)
superio_set_bit(watchdog.sioaddr, 0x29, 1);
break;
 
+   case f71889fg:
+   /* set pin 40 to WDTRST# */
+   superio_outb(watchdog.sioaddr, 0x2b,
+   superio_inb(watchdog.sioaddr, 0x2b)  0xcf);
+   break;
+
default:
/*
 * 'default' label to shut up the compiler and catch
@@ -708,8 +714,10 @@ static int __init f71808e_find(int sioaddr)
case SIO_F71882_ID:
watchdog.type = f71882fg;
break;
-   case SIO_F71862_ID:
case SIO_F71889_ID:
+   watchdog.type = f71889fg;
+   break;
+   case SIO_F71862_ID:
/* These have a watchdog, though it isn't implemented (yet). */
err = -ENOSYS;
goto exit;
-- 
1.6.4.4




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286181928-4010-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu



Bug#592955: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: Can’t see mouse pointer in X)

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:03:24 +
with message-id e1p2gxa-00042t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#592415: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #592415,
regarding linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: Can’t see mouse pointer in X
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.1
Severity: important

Hi,

when I run the 2.6.35 kernel, I can’t see the mouse pointer under X
on my ThinkPad X40.

The mouse pointer works fine: I can right–click to get context menus
and select any of the menu items to activate it. Focus–follows–mouse
also works fine, only I can’t see where the pointer is located.

The problem goes away as soon as I boot using the 2.6.34 kernel,
installed a while ago from experimental.


-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.35-trunk-686 (Debian 2.6.35-1~experimental.1) 
(m...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.4.4 (Debian 4.4.4-7) ) #1 SMP Fri Aug 6 
14:49:07 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.35-trunk-686 root=/dev/mapper/lagann-root ro quiet

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[2.796297] ata1.00: 31522816 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 
[2.804207] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
[2.804359] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  KingSpec KSD-PA1 0908 
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[3.278886] e1000 :02:01.0: eth0: (PCI:33MHz:32-bit) 00:0a:e4:2d:dc:07
[3.278895] e1000 :02:01.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
[3.278923] sdhci-pci :02:00.1: SDHCI controller found [1180:0822] (rev 
13)
[3.278943] sdhci-pci :02:00.1: PCI INT B - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 
17
[3.279967] sdhci-pci :02:00.1: Will use DMA mode even though HW doesn't 
fully claim to support it.
[3.281080] Registered led device: mmc0::
[3.282149] mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI [:02:00.1] using DMA
[3.914628] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48
[3.921072] fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
[3.921075] drm: registered panic notifier
[3.921093] Slow work thread pool: Starting up
[3.921147] Slow work thread pool: Ready
[3.921158] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0
[3.941738] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 31522816 512-byte logical blocks: (16.1 
GB/15.0 GiB)
[3.941813] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[3.941818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[3.941849] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, 
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[3.942046]  sda: sda1 sda2
[3.943039] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
[4.027696] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
[4.028499] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.17.0-ioctl (2010-03-05) initialised: 
dm-de...@redhat.com
[   10.472711] EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: 
(null)
[   11.122465] udev: starting version 160
[   11.587872] Non-volatile memory driver v1.3
[   11.618020] ACPI: AC Adapter [AC] (on-line)
[   11.622128] input: PC Speaker as /devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input5
[   11.644139] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery absent)
[   11.709962] intel_rng: FWH not detected
[   11.740606] ACPI: acpi_idle registered with cpuidle
[   11.742293] Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle
[   11.758574] i801_smbus :00:1f.3: PCI INT B - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 
17
[   11.762284] Switching to clocksource acpi_pm
[   11.787659] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
[   11.828803] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
[   11.866687] NET: Registered protocol family 23
[   11.886617] nsc-ircc 00:09: activated
[   11.886647] nsc-ircc, chip-init
[   11.886658] nsc-ircc, Found chip at base=0x164e
[   11.886682] nsc-ircc, driver loaded (Dag Brattli)
[   11.897864] IrDA: Registered device irda0
[   11.897870] nsc-ircc, Using dongle: IBM31T1100 or Temic TFDS6000/TFDS6500
[   12.023410] yenta_cardbus :02:00.0: CardBus bridge found [1014:0555]
[   12.149151] yenta_cardbus :02:00.0: ISA IRQ mask 0x0cb0, PCI irq 16
[   12.149158] yenta_cardbus :02:00.0: Socket status: 3006
[   12.149170] yenta_cardbus :02:00.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge window: 
[io  0x3000-0x7fff]
[   12.149177] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x3000-0x7fff: 
excluding 0x3000-0x30ff 0x3400-0x34ff 0x7000-0x703f
[   12.190494] yenta_cardbus :02:00.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge window: 
[mem 0xd020-0xdfff]
[   12.190502] 

Re: [PATCH] d-i manual: nuke references to kernel-img.conf

2010-10-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting maximilian attems (m...@stro.at):
 In squeeze it is no longer necessary or useful to generate or
 to consult kernel-img.conf.
 
 Thanks to the new bootloader policy, see:
 http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html


Thanks for the patch. I added committing it to my TODO list (I'll also
try to learn about updating translation files for the D-I
manualwe're stil lin the process of taking things over after
Frans' loss, for the D-I manual).



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#598207: marked as done ([linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64] BUG: NULL pointer dereference)

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:03:24 +
with message-id e1p2gxa-00042y...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#598207: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #598207,
regarding [linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64] BUG: NULL pointer dereference
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
598207: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64
Version: 2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1

Severity: important

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

When booting I see the following bug:

Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.679118] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at (null)
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] IP: [a0078ea2] 
hiddev_open+0x89/0x15b [usbhid]
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] PGD 139902067 PUD 13a2c8067 PMD 0 
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] last sysfs file: 
/sys/devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input0/capabilities/sw
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] CPU 1 
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Modules linked in: vboxnetadp 
vboxnetflt vboxdrv microcode binfmt_misc ipt_LOG ip6t_LOG xt_comment 
ip6t_REJECT ipt_REJECT ipt_addrtype xt_multiport xt_mark nf_conntrack_ipv6 
ip6table_mangle ip6table_raw ip6table_filter ip6_tables xt_tcpudp xt_conntrack 
iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_raw 
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ext2 nf_conntrack_ftp 
nf_conntrack tp_smapi thinkpad_ec loop snd_hda_codec_conexant snd_hda_intel 
snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep arc4 snd_pcm_oss ecb snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm 
thinkpad_acpi iwlagn snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event iwlcore 
snd_seq mac80211 uvcvideo joydev snd_timer videodev v4l1_compat snd_seq_device 
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 cfg80211 tpm_tis i2c_i801 tpm rfkill wmi psmouse snd 
tpm_bios battery nvram serio_raw ac soundcore snd_page_alloc evdev 
processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc 
dm_crypt dm_mod sg sr_mod sd_mod cdrom crc_t10dif usbhid hid i915 ahci libahci 
lib
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: ata uhci_hcd scsi_mod drm_kms_helper ehci_hcd drm 
sdhci_pci sdhci i2c_algo_bit usbcore e1000e i2c_core mmc_core thermal video 
led_class button output nls_base thermal_sys [last unloaded: 
scsi_wait_scan]
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] 
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Pid: 2059, comm: hald-probe-hidd 
Not tainted 2.6.36-rc5-amd64 #1 2808D9G/2808D9G
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] RIP: 0010:[a0078ea2]  
[a0078ea2] hiddev_open+0x89/0x15b [usbhid]
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] RSP: 0018:880139a0dcb8  
EFLAGS: 00010286
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] RAX:  RBX: 
880139aa RCX: 0001
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] RDX: a007cc90 RSI: 
a007bf0b RDI: 880139aac030
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] RBP:  R08: 
80d0 R09: 88013863d970
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] R10: a01f4059 R11: 
ffed R12: 8801399ac300
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] R13: ffed R14: 
 R15: 88013a20f780
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] FS:  7f709325f700() 
GS:880001a8() knlGS:
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 
80050033
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] CR2:  CR3: 
000138f3a000 CR4: 000406e0
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] DR0:  DR1: 
 DR2: 
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] DR3:  DR6: 
0ff0 DR7: 0400
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Process hald-probe-hidd (pid: 
2059, threadinfo 880139a0c000, task 88013abea210)
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Stack:
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006]  880137ffb480 a02065a0 
8801399ac300 880137495b40
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] 0 ffed 
a01ff5d3 8801399ac300 880137495b40
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] 0 8801399ac300 
880137ffb480  810eeacc
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk kernel: [   13.680006] Call Trace:
Sep 27 15:01:52 nanuk 

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:47:11PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:33:23AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
  On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
  On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  I would also be interested in the watchdog support for the same
  chip,
  
  That patch does *not* add watchdog support for the Fintek F71889FG
  chip, it *only* adds support for the F71808E and the F71882FG.
  Additionally a patch for the F71862FG is currently pending review
  and inclusion.
  
  That being said, this driver should be fairly easy to expand to
  include support for the F71889FG chip (AFAIK only pin-configuration
  should be added, which probably is just a datasheet-reading
  exercise).  Adding support however would be something I'd suggest
  doing across the LKML *first*, then (optionally) backport it later.
  
  Heck I gave it a try and attached you'll find a patch to add F71889FG
  support to the current f71808e_wdt watchdog driver.  The reason I
  haven't send this to the LKML before however, is that I don't have
  any system with that chip to test it, so please do test it and tell
  me the results.
  
  I gave a try to your patch, on top of the other ones.
  
  For the kernel team, please note that some of the patches don't apply
  cleanly on 2.6.32, because of some changes in context (mostly
  coding-style changes) that apparently happened between 2.6.32 and the
  various patches landing. I manually edited the patches to make them
  apply properly, please ping me if you want the modified versions. The
  configs also need to be modified to include CONFIG_F71808E_WDT=m.
 
 For the patches cherry-picking 729d273a, 8b6d043 and 96cb4eb (in that
 order) will do.  8b6d043 will probably cause a merge-conflict, just
 ditch IORESOURCE_WINDOW and you should be able to finish that
 cherry-pick.

Exactly. I also had to edit the hwmon: f71882fg: use a muxed resource lock
for the Super I/O port because of style changes.

  Still for the kernel team, applying the release_mutex_region patch
  makes the ABI check script barf with the following changes:
  __devm_release_regionmodule: vmlinux,
  version: 0x969a2a91 - 0x70191467, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
  __devm_request_regionmodule: vmlinux,
  version: 0x51144912 - 0x9e7acb57, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
 
  For Giel, it appears the watchdog driver doesn't entirely work:
  It loads fine:
  f71808e_wdt: Found f71889fg watchdog chip, revision 21
  But watchdog-test (as from Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-test.c)
  doesn't work and outputs:
  Watchdog device not enabled.
  stracing it shows this:
  open(/dev/watchdog, O_WRONLY) = -1 ENODEV (No such
  device)
 
 Right, it seems that I forgot a single break-statement (causing the
 driver to fall through to the undetected part).  Attached patch has this
 fixed and should work properly.

I may have fucked up, but it looks like it doesn't work either. Same
behaviour as before. :( I'm trying another build.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004072920.ga5...@glandium.org



Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-04 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:40:33 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 14:02:32 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
 [1] 1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu
 
 AFAICS, this id refers to the patch that ended in 
 96cb4eb019ce3185ec0d946a74b5a2202f5067c9.
 
 I can't find that commit in Torvald's tree.  Who's the author and
 what's the first line of the commit message?
 
 .. snip ..
 
 In Linus' tree.
 $ git describe --contains 96cb4eb019ce3185ec0d946a74b5a2202f5067c9
 v2.6.36-rc1~290^2~2

Right, looking at my shell's history I see I accidentily copied the
dot following the SHA-1 hash.  Removing it solved that problem.

And yes that patch is part of the same series as the one eventually
adding the watchdog driver.  That patch is now applied in the hwmon
branch of Guenter Roeck's staging tree with hash
cadb86570c41fe52a0ea741f1f9775e3412f0167.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/groeck/staging.git;a=summary

 The one you are referring to must be
 http://marc.info/?l=lm-sensorsm=127219192018988w=2
 
 Actually I'm referring to this patch (updated/rebased version of the one
 you're referring to):
 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=128066949410960w=2
 
 PS marc.info allows direct searching on Message-ID like so:
http://marc.info/?i=$message_id
 e.g.:
http://marc.info/?i=1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu
 
 Interestingly, I found this with your message-id:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116315/

That Message-ID isn't the same, note the ...-31283-2-git-... part
instead of the ...-31283-1-git-... part given in my Message-ID.  That
patch is the second in the same patch series.  This patch is the correct
one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116314/

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,
Giel van Schijndel
--
A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.
  -- Albert Einstein


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#599030: linux-2.6: cannot play dvd, if disk included on boot

2010-10-04 Thread zoltan herman
tags 599030 - upstream
thanks

Sorry, the upstream tag resulted from wrong reportbug configuration.




Situation:
Sata dvd-usb/sata converter-pci usb card with VIA chip-MoBoard

No, it's a Sata DVD on usb/sata converter(JMicron):
-
CD-ROMOptiarc  DVD RW AD-7203S  1.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
48x/48x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray

-
usb/sata converter(JMicron) :
usb 2-4: Product: USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge

-
The card has 4+1 port USB (1 internal share, 4 external) with VIA chip:

03:03.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1
Controller (rev 62) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 26
I/O ports at 2480 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd

03:03.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1
Controller (rev 62) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 27
I/O ports at 24a0 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd

03:03.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 65) (prog-if 20
[EHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 24
Memory at dd201800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd



Thanks
Zoli


Memory leaks (Desperate help!)

2010-10-04 Thread Teresa e Junior
Hello!

Please, I need some attention or I may end up damaging my machine!

I've been struggling for not few hours with memory leaks on this
machine. I'm running 2.6.32-5-686, and the problem is as follows:

Some months ago, I have compiled kernel 2.6.33-2-686 without any issues
in this same machine. This week I have tried compiling GNUzilla Icecat
and the 2.6.35 kernel, but when compiling the kernel, when it is just
starting compiling, all real memory (2GB) fills, and when beginning to
swap, the machine becomes absolutely unresponsive. With Icecat, it
takes 15 minutes before this happens, and today I tried leaving it
working for almost 5 hours, unresponsive, before killing the machine.

I killed the machine almost 10 times this week with high I/O activity.
I've already tried changing vm.swapinness to 60, and
vm.overcommit_memory to 2, but nothing helps. Also disabled the memlock
available for audio applications, but nothing yet. Increased my swap to
10GB, but nothing.

So here goes the output of some commands:

# sysctl -a | grep vm. | sort
error: permission denied on key 'net.ipv4.route.flush'
error: permission denied on key 'net.ipv6.route.flush'
vm.block_dump = 0
vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
vm.dirty_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
vm.dirty_ratio = 20
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
vm.drop_caches = 0
vm.highmem_is_dirtyable = 0
vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
vm.laptop_mode = 0
vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256   32  32
vm.max_map_count = 65530
vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
vm.min_free_kbytes = 3789
vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
vm.nr_hugepages = 0
vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
vm.oom_dump_tasks = 0
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
vm.overcommit_memory = 0
vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
vm.page-cluster = 3
vm.panic_on_oom = 0
vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
vm.scan_unevictable_pages = 0
vm.stat_interval = 1
vm.swappiness = 60
vm.vdso_enabled = 1
vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100

$ ulimit -a
core file size  (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size   (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size   (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 16382
max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files  (-n) 1024
pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority  (-r) 0
stack size  (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time   (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes  (-u) unlimited
virtual memory  (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks  (-x) unlimited

$ free -m
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:  1987437   1549  051 192
-/+ buffers/cache:193   1793
Swap:10240  0  10240


Any help will be appreciated!
Teresa e Junior


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004084748.017b5...@gmail.com



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:55:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:18 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
   reassign 599054 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
   thanks
   
/etc/init.d/virtualbox-ose start fails with:

Oct  4 09:27:38 blegrez kernel: [  247.934129] supdrvGipCreate: failed 
to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8

This is for sure true on i386 and does not allow rebuilding of modules 
too.
   
   I don't know what you mean with does not allow rebuilding of modules. A
   simple module rebuild fixed the problem for me which leads me to believe 
   that
   the kernel ABI has changed.
   
  
  module-assistant fails as well:
  
  Done with 
  /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb
   . 
  dpkg -Ei 
  /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb
   
  Selezionato il pacchetto virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686.
  (Lettura del database... 309581 file e directory attualmente installati.)
  Estrazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 (da 
  .../virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb)...
  Configurazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 
  (3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24)...
  Stopping VirtualBox kernel modules.
  Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 
  'dmesg' to find out why ... failed!
   failed!
 [...]
 
 So are you going to run dmesg or just make us guess?
 
 Ben.
 

An easy guess: it is exactly the same error already pointed in the report.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004121418.gg3...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:18 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
  reassign 599054 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
  thanks
  
   /etc/init.d/virtualbox-ose start fails with:
   
   Oct  4 09:27:38 blegrez kernel: [  247.934129] supdrvGipCreate: failed to 
   allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
   
   This is for sure true on i386 and does not allow rebuilding of modules 
   too.
  
  I don't know what you mean with does not allow rebuilding of modules. A
  simple module rebuild fixed the problem for me which leads me to believe 
  that
  the kernel ABI has changed.
  
 
 module-assistant fails as well:
 
 Done with 
 /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb 
 . 
 dpkg -Ei 
 /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb 
 Selezionato il pacchetto virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686.
 (Lettura del database... 309581 file e directory attualmente installati.)
 Estrazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 (da 
 .../virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb)...
 Configurazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 
 (3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24)...
 Stopping VirtualBox kernel modules.
 Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 'dmesg' 
 to find out why ... failed!
  failed!
[...]

So are you going to run dmesg or just make us guess?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: Re: Bug#599030: linux-2.6: cannot play dvd, if disk included on boot

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 599030 - upstream
Bug #599030 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: cannot play dvd, if disk included on boot
Removed tag(s) upstream.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599030: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128619154918865.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
 module-assistant fails as well:
 ...
 Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 'dmesg' 
 to find out why ... failed!
  failed!
 invoke-rc.d: initscript virtualbox-ose, action restart failed.

Are you sure your headers are correct? I tried both, the dkms build and the m-a 
build and both worked for me.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004121226.ga16...@hyperion.credativ.de



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:17:27PM +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote:
 Ben Hutchings wrote:
 synaptic makes this difficult.  Use apt:

 apt-get install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64 linux-base/experimental

 Ben.
   
 Done.
 It seems OK but recently I tried running GoogleEarth after a resume from  
 hibernate and my system froze.

 Should I report this separately?

rc6 should available soonest, please try to reproduce on rc6 and if possible
file new report please.

thanks.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004122301.gy5...@vostochny.stro.at



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-04 Thread Philip Ashmore

Ben Hutchings wrote:

synaptic makes this difficult.  Use apt:

apt-get install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64 linux-base/experimental

Ben.
  

Done.
It seems OK but recently I tried running GoogleEarth after a resume from 
hibernate and my system froze.


Should I report this separately?

Philip



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca9c5d7@philipashmore.com



Bug#598023: marked as done (linux-base in experimental still depends on libapt-pkg-perl)

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:03:24 +
with message-id e1p2gxa-00042q...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#589996: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #589996,
regarding linux-base in experimental still depends on libapt-pkg-perl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
589996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.3
Severity: normal


linux-base in experimental still depends on libapt-pkg-perl, which
makes it uninstallable, and makes the experimental linux-image
uninstallable.

This has been fixed in sid afaics (bug 589996), but not in experimental.
Maybe it's just a matter of uploading an updated package, I don't know.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libuuid-perl  0.02-4 Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii  udev  161-1  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  util-linux2.17.2-3.2 Miscellaneous system utilities

linux-base recommends no packages.

linux-base suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual-boot-loader:
  linux-base/disk-id-update-failed:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual:
  linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan-no-relabel: true
  linux-base/disk-id-convert-auto: true
  linux-base/do-bootloader-default-changed:
  linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan: true


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 589...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (supplier of updated linux-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 21:18:41 +0100
Source: linux-2.6
Binary: linux-tools-2.6.36 linux-source-2.6.36 linux-doc-2.6.36 
linux-manual-2.6.36 linux-patch-debian-2.6.36 firmware-linux-free 
linux-support-2.6.36-rc6 linux-base linux-libc-dev linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-all 
linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-all-alpha linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-common 
linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-generic linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-generic 
linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-smp linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-smp 
linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-legacy linux-headers-2.6.36-rc6-alpha-legacy 

Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Meskes
 I'm not about to dig into the virtualbox source, so you tell me what's
 going on.

I guess he was talking about the bug report. The message is this:

[11016.299837] supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004131027.gb25...@hyperion.credativ.de



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
 reassign 599054 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
 thanks
 
  /etc/init.d/virtualbox-ose start fails with:
  
  Oct  4 09:27:38 blegrez kernel: [  247.934129] supdrvGipCreate: failed to 
  allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
  
  This is for sure true on i386 and does not allow rebuilding of modules too.
 
 I don't know what you mean with does not allow rebuilding of modules. A
 simple module rebuild fixed the problem for me which leads me to believe that
 the kernel ABI has changed.
 

module-assistant fails as well:

Done with 
/usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb .  
   
dpkg -Ei 
/usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb 
Selezionato il pacchetto virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686.
(Lettura del database... 309581 file e directory attualmente installati.)
Estrazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 (da 
.../virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb)...
Configurazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 
(3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24)...
Stopping VirtualBox kernel modules.
Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 'dmesg' 
to find out why ... failed!
 failed!
invoke-rc.d: initscript virtualbox-ose, action restart failed.

(sorry for localized information)

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004111842.ge3...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
  module-assistant fails as well:
  ...
  Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 
  'dmesg' to find out why ... failed!
   failed!
  invoke-rc.d: initscript virtualbox-ose, action restart failed.
 
 Are you sure your headers are correct? I tried both, the dkms build and the 
 m-a build and both worked for me.
 
 Michael

I had to rebuild both -guest-kms and -ose modules, which implies that
there's not a safe upgrade path for vbox when ABI changes as it is
currently. Quite bad, because the näive user needs to manually recover
things more than expected.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004124907.gh3...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it



Bug#589996: marked as done (Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed on update)

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:03:24 +
with message-id e1p2gxa-00042q...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#589996: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #589996,
regarding Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed on update
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
589996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-17
Severity: important

Hi,

in the linux-image packages there is now a dependency chain from
linux-image-2.6... - linux-base - libapt-pkg-perl -
libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. Which is the virtual package provided by apt
to signal the ABI of its library and binary caches. In effect the
kernels are locked to a specific ABI version of apt. The problem is
that the ABI changes from time to time and every time it does an
update of apt will now remove the kernel for the duration of the
transition. For an example try installing apt from experimental.

Well, that is life you might say. That is what is called a library
transition.

But here comes the insane part. The 1637 line long perl postinst
script of linux-base only depends on apt because of this code at the
end:

sub compare_versions {
return $AptPkg::Config::_config-system-versioning-compare(@_);
}

if ($ARGV[0] eq 'reconfigure' || defined($ENV{DEBCONF_RECONFIGURE}) ||
(!is_fresh_installation() 
 compare_versions($ARGV[1], $libata_transition_ver)  0)) {
DebianKernel::DiskId::transition();
}


Could I suggest replacing this with a call to

  system('dpkg', '--compare-versions', $ARGV[1], '', $libata_transition_ver)

That way the dependency on apt can be droped completly.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-xen-2010.02.18 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libuuid-perl  0.02-3+b1  Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii  udev  157-1  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  util-linux2.17.2-3   Miscellaneous system utilities

linux-base recommends no packages.

linux-base suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 589...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (supplier of updated linux-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; 

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  Right, it seems that I forgot a single break-statement (causing the
  driver to fall through to the undetected part).  Attached patch has this
  fixed and should work properly.
 
 I may have fucked up, but it looks like it doesn't work either. Same
 behaviour as before. :( I'm trying another build.

I did fuck up, and it just works fine. I used watchdog-test and kill
-STOP it, and the machine rebooted within a few seconds, as expected.

Thanks

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004074428.ga5...@glandium.org



linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2010-10-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6.orig.tar.gz
linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
  to 
main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional kernel
linux-2.6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc - source devel
linux-base_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional kernel
linux-doc-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional doc
linux-manual-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional doc
linux-patch-debian-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional kernel
linux-source-2.6.36_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional kernel
linux-support-2.6.36-rc6_2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb - optional devel

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 589996 592415 598207 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p2gxa-00042k...@franck.debian.org



Processed: Re: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 599054 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Bug #599054 [virtualbox-ose] After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable
Bug reassigned from package 'virtualbox-ose' to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions virtualbox-ose/3.2.8-dfsg-2.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599054
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12861897178828.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 14:14 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:55:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:18 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
   On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
reassign 599054 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
thanks

 /etc/init.d/virtualbox-ose start fails with:
 
 Oct  4 09:27:38 blegrez kernel: [  247.934129] supdrvGipCreate: 
 failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
 
 This is for sure true on i386 and does not allow rebuilding of 
 modules too.

I don't know what you mean with does not allow rebuilding of modules. 
A
simple module rebuild fixed the problem for me which leads me to 
believe that
the kernel ABI has changed.

   
   module-assistant fails as well:
   
   Done with 
   /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb
. 
   dpkg -Ei 
   /usr/src/virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb

   Selezionato il pacchetto virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686.
   (Lettura del database... 309581 file e directory attualmente installati.)
   Estrazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 (da 
   .../virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686_3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24_i386.deb)...
   Configurazione di virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.32-5-686 
   (3.2.8-dfsg-2+2.6.32-24)...
   Stopping VirtualBox kernel modules.
   Starting VirtualBox kernel modulesmodprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 
   'dmesg' to find out why ... failed!
failed!
  [...]
  
  So are you going to run dmesg or just make us guess?
  
  Ben.
  
 
 An easy guess: it is exactly the same error already pointed in the report.

I'm not about to dig into the virtualbox source, so you tell me what's
going on.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: severity of 599054 is normal

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 599054 normal
Bug #599054 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-686] After kernel upgrading vbox is no more 
usable
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599054
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128619590311664.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#599054: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
  I'm not about to dig into the virtualbox source, so you tell me what's
  going on.
 
 I guess he was talking about the bug report. The message is this:
 
 [11016.299837] supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
 
Yeah, and that means what?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004150402.gn13...@decadent.org.uk



Bug#595711: new bug description

2010-10-04 Thread George Shuklin
I found one more very interesting feature of this bug: 

When memory overcommitment is disabled, system shall not be in state
when OOM killer is called. (Only 'EOM' for greedy application).

But with this kernel OOM is still appear, even no overcommitment
happens.

Steps to reproduce:

mem=1GiB
maxmem=16GiB
disable swap.

After VM boot:

sysctl vm.overcommit_memory=2
vm.overcommit_memory = 2

python
a= *1024*1024*128
b= *1024*1024*128
c= *1024*1024*128
Killed

dmesg

[  108.601023] python invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1280d2, order=0,
oomkilladj=0
[  108.601044] Pid: 1574, comm: python Not tainted 2.6.26-2-xen-686 #1
[  108.601051]  [c0150d96] oom_kill_process+0x4f/0x1bb
[  108.601062]  [c0125118] __capable+0x8/0x1b
[  108.601069]  [c0151237] out_of_memory+0x14e/0x17f
[  108.601075]  [c0153285] __alloc_pages_internal+0x2b8/0x34e
[  108.601085]  [c0153327] __alloc_pages+0x7/0x9
[  108.601090]  [c015e83c] handle_mm_fault+0x299/0xda5
[  108.601097]  [c0131916] hrtimer_run_pending+0x19/0xf7
[  108.601107]  [c0126312] run_timer_softirq+0x30/0x1c8
[  108.601112]  [c010eaf3] do_page_fault+0x605/0xb2e
[  108.601121]  [c0122e08] do_softirq+0x51/0x76
[  108.601126]  [c0105b05] do_IRQ+0x52/0x65
[  108.601133]  [c023dba3] evtchn_do_upcall+0xfa/0x191
[  108.601139]  [c010e4ee] do_page_fault+0x0/0xb2e
[  108.601145]  [c02cc6ad] error_code+0x35/0x3c
[  108.601154]  [c02c] setup_cpu_cache+0x4/0x11f
[  108.601163]  ===
[  108.601166] Mem-info:
[  108.601168] DMA per-cpu:
[  108.601173] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[  108.601177] Normal per-cpu:
[  108.601180] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 161
[  108.601185] HighMem per-cpu:
[  108.601188] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  97
[  108.601192] Active:92875 inactive:123 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
[  108.601193]  free:128300 slab:1223 mapped:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0
[  108.601202] DMA free:12320kB min:72kB low:88kB high:108kB active:0kB
inactive:0kB present:16256kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
[  108.601210] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 706 16240 16240
[  108.601218] Normal free:500372kB min:3364kB low:4204kB high:5044kB
active:66296kB inactive:116kB present:723392kB pages_scanned:114955
all_unreclaimable? yes
[  108.601227] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 124269 124269
[  108.601237] HighMem free:508kB min:512kB low:19004kB high:37500kB
active:305204kB inactive:376kB present:15906496kB pages_scanned:678120
all_unreclaimable? yes
[  108.601244] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
[  108.601252] DMA: 0*4kB 2*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12320kB
[  108.601269] Normal: 195*4kB 58*8kB 29*16kB 17*32kB 11*64kB 0*128kB
1*256kB 3*512kB 2*1024kB 3*2048kB 119*4096kB = 500364kB
[  108.601289] HighMem: 2*4kB 13*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB
1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 496kB
[  108.601306] 183 total pagecache pages
[  108.601311] Swap cache: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
[  108.601315] Free swap  = 0kB
[  108.601317] Total swap = 0kB
[  108.636184] 4194304 pages of RAM
[  108.636196] 4007936 pages of HIGHMEM
[  108.636199] 38231 reserved pages
[  108.636201] 69 pages shared
[  108.636203] 0 pages swap cached
[  108.636206] 0 pages dirty
[  108.636208] 0 pages writeback
[  108.636211] 0 pages mapped
[  108.636213] 1223 pages slab
[  108.636215] 0 pages pagetables
[  108.636225] Out of memory: kill process 1574 (python) score 6255 or a
child
[  108.636236] Killed process 1574 (python)



AFAIK in normal system no OOM shall be when overcommitment is disabled.
I recheck behavior on normal kernel and it was fine (just MemoryErrors)
from python.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286207457.16126.7.ca...@home.desunote.ru



Processed: severity of 599089 is important

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 severity 599089 important
Bug #599089 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686: Kernel Panics when using 
NFS from DomU to Dom0
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128620830411524.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#517449: problem also occurs on 2.6.32

2010-10-04 Thread Toni Mueller


Hi,

I have the almost latest of  2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (2.6.32-21~bpo50+1),
and the problem occured to me several times today.


Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712134] INFO: task sync:18607 blocked 
for more than 120 seconds.
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712138] echo 0  
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message.
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712141] sync  D 
 0 18607  18591 0x
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712145]  814591f0 
0086  88009c6bbe30
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712150]   
f9e0 88009c6bbfd8 00015780
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712153]  00015780 
88011d78f100 88011d78f3f8 810402dc
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712157] Call Trace:
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712166]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712170]  [81106598] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x9/0xe
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712174]  [812f81d5] ? 
__wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712177]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712180]  [812f826f] ? 
out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712184]  [810638fc] ? 
wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712188]  [81106610] ? 
sync_inodes_sb+0x73/0x12a
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712191]  [8110a175] ? 
__sync_filesystem+0x4b/0x70
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712194]  [8110a234] ? 
sync_filesystems+0x9a/0xe3
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712197]  [8110a2c2] ? 
sys_sync+0x1c/0x2e
Oct  4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712202]  [81010b42] ? 
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712565] INFO: task sync:18607 blocked 
for more than 120 seconds.
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712569] echo 0  
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message.
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712572] sync  D 
 0 18607  18591 0x
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712577]  814591f0 
0086  88009c6bbe30
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712581]   
f9e0 88009c6bbfd8 00015780
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712585]  00015780 
88011d78f100 88011d78f3f8 810402dc
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712588] Call Trace:
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712598]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712601]  [81106598] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x9/0xe
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712606]  [812f81d5] ? 
__wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712609]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712613]  [812f826f] ? 
out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712616]  [810638fc] ? 
wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712620]  [81106610] ? 
sync_inodes_sb+0x73/0x12a
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712623]  [8110a175] ? 
__sync_filesystem+0x4b/0x70
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712626]  [8110a234] ? 
sync_filesystems+0x9a/0xe3
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712629]  [8110a2c2] ? 
sys_sync+0x1c/0x2e
Oct  4 12:24:22 debian kernel: [1963200.712634]  [81010b42] ? 
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712059] INFO: task sync:18607 blocked 
for more than 120 seconds.
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712064] echo 0  
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message.
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712066] sync  D 
 0 18607  18591 0x
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712071]  814591f0 
0086  88009c6bbe30
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712075]   
f9e0 88009c6bbfd8 00015780
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712079]  00015780 
88011d78f100 88011d78f3f8 810402dc
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712083] Call Trace:
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712092]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712096]  [81106598] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x9/0xe
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712100]  [812f81d5] ? 
__wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712103]  [8110658f] ? 
bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xe
Oct  4 12:26:22 debian kernel: [1963320.712106]  [812f826f] ? 
out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77

Bug#598518: linux-image-2.6-686: ata_piix module loaded before ahci module deactivate hotplug support (regression from lenny)

2010-10-04 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello,

On 09/30/2010 12:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:50 +0200, thomas.debesse+deb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 [...]
 ICH6 sata controller could be managed by both ata_piix and ahci module but 
 only
 ahci module handle hotplug.
 At boot time, when ata_piix is loaded before ahci module, it takes control of
 the ICH6 controller and the ahci module does'nt manage nothing. Because
 ata_piix also manage ICH6 sata controller, hard drives are managed, but 
 because
 ata_piix module is used in place of ahci module, because ahci module is'nt
 used, hotplug (and other ahci functionnalities indeed) does'nt works.
 [...]
 The solution is to load ahci module before ata_piix module, then we can have
 SATA drives managed by ahci module and IDE drives managed by ata_piix module.
 [...]
 
 You can force ahci to be loaded first:
 1. Add the line 'ahci' to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules.
 2. Run 'update-initramfs -u' to regenerate the initramfs.
 3. Reboot.
 
 But it seems like it would be better if ahci was automatically
 preferred.

With modules.order in place, modprobe will always prefer ahci over
ata_piix (the preference follows the link order).  Maybe debian initrd
doesn't handle modules.order properly?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caa04fb.7070...@gmail.com



Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
 # remote status report for #596801 (http://bugs.debian.org/596801)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19122
 #  * remote status changed: (?) - NEEDINFO
 usertags 596801 + status-NEEDINFO
Bug#596801: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-686: keyboard  touchpad io breaks when 
netbook LED switches on or off
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEEDINFO.
 # remote status report for #598533 (http://bugs.debian.org/598533)
 #  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
 #  * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED
 #  * remote resolution changed: (?) - PATCH-ALREADY-AVAILABLE
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 598533 + fixed-upstream
Bug #598533 [linux-2.6] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 598533 + status-RESOLVED resolution-PATCH-ALREADY-AVAILABLE
Bug#598533: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-PATCH-ALREADY-AVAILABLE.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
598533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12862135257029.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-10-04 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #596801 (http://bugs.debian.org/596801)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19122
#  * remote status changed: (?) - NEEDINFO
usertags 596801 + status-NEEDINFO

# remote status report for #598533 (http://bugs.debian.org/598533)
#  * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
#  * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) - PATCH-ALREADY-AVAILABLE
#  * closed upstream
tags 598533 + fixed-upstream
usertags 598533 + status-RESOLVED resolution-PATCH-ALREADY-AVAILABLE

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20101004173203.5479.68386.btsl...@merkel.debian.org



Bug#598518: linux-image-2.6-686: ata_piix module loaded before ahci module deactivate hotplug support (regression from lenny)

2010-10-04 Thread maximilian attems
hello,

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:46:51PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
  The solution is to load ahci module before ata_piix module, then we can 
  have
  SATA drives managed by ahci module and IDE drives managed by ata_piix 
  module.
  [...]
  
  You can force ahci to be loaded first:
  1. Add the line 'ahci' to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules.
  2. Run 'update-initramfs -u' to regenerate the initramfs.
  3. Reboot.
  
  But it seems like it would be better if ahci was automatically
  preferred.
 
 With modules.order in place, modprobe will always prefer ahci over
 ata_piix (the preference follows the link order).  Maybe debian initrd
 doesn't handle modules.order properly?

we do shipp modules.order in initramfs.

hmm thomas what are your MODULES settings, please post output of
 egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/

if MODULES=dep appears it could be that the sys walking code has
a bug in adding the wrong module to the initramfs.
please change it to the safe and default MODULES=most and regenerate:
update-initramfs -u -k kernelversion

you can check any initramfs if it has the relevant modules with
lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-trunk-amd64 | grep ahci 


thanks

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004175438.gz5...@vostochny.stro.at



Re: [RFC][PATCH] [ia64] Raise minimum binutils version and remove checks for old bugs

2010-10-04 Thread Tony Luck
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
 diff --git a/Documentation/Changes b/Documentation/Changes
 index 4fb88f1..23fc499 100644
 --- a/Documentation/Changes
 +++ b/Documentation/Changes
 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ isdn4k-utils.

  o  Gnu C                  3.2                     # gcc --version
  o  Gnu make               3.80                    # make --version
 -o  binutils               2.12                    # ld -v
 +o  binutils               2.12 (2.16 for ia64)    # ld -v
  o  util-linux             2.10o                   # fdformat --version
  o  module-init-tools      0.9.10                  # depmod -V
  o  e2fsprogs              1.41.4                  # e2fsck -V

Won't this file become a complete mess if each architecture starts
specifying its own version for each of the tools?  Is it likely that
all the others will follow ia64's bold lead in moving past 2.12
for binutils?

Overall this patch looks to be a good idea (oldest binutils on any
of my systems is 2.17) ... so clearing out all the ancient tests
for long-fixed bugs is nice.  But I worry about being the trend
setter here.

-Tony


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=jqpfknhxcw2dp5qwn9hjg9gk3uzagtrndn...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#599121: linux-2.6: [m68k] nfeth driver vanished? no network connectivity!

2010-10-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-24
Severity: important
Tags: experimental sid

After compiling an m68k kernel for ARAnyM using the atari platform,
requiring the fix from Debian #598893 as well as a patch I've sub-
mitted upstream¹ in order to allow inclusion into the Debian kernel,
and getting it to boot into multiuser, I find myself with a system
that doesn't support the nfeth (nat-feature) ethernet endpoint.

Further grepping in sid and experimental reveals:

t...@frozenfish:~/linux-2.6-2.6.32 $ fgrep -r NFETH .
../debian/config/m68k/config.atari:CONFIG_NFETH=y
t...@frozenfish:~/linux-2.6-2.6.36~rc6 $ fgrep -r NFETH .
../debian/config/m68k/config.atari:CONFIG_NFETH=y

So this must have been lost somewhere in the progress; I believe it
was available in linux-image-2.6.29-2-atari_2.6.29-5_m68k and can
say for sure 2.6.26-1-atari (Debian 2.6.26-13) had it.

With having *either* TLS *or* (virtual) networking but not both,
and having to rely on VMs to develop, this unfortunately brings
my attempts at helping reviving m68k to just another stop.

So, please bring back these patches. Thanks in advance!


① http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.m68k/1580/focus=1581
  I'll reportbug this separately once the maintainer accepted it.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: m68k

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-atari
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh-static



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20101004204515.6931.50532.report...@www.freewrt.org



Processed: severity of 599118 is important

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 599118 important
Bug #599118 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64: crashes hard after 
starting firefox
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599118: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599118
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128622535432159.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#599121: Acknowledgement (linux-2.6: [m68k] nfeth driver vanished? no network connectivity!)

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 599121 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
Bug #599121 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [m68k] nfeth driver vanished? no network 
connectivity!
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599121: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599121
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12862257192355.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: severity of 599118 is important

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 599118 important
Bug #599118 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64: crashes hard after 
starting firefox
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 599118 to the same value.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599118: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599118
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128623539211285.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: severity of 599121 is wishlist

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 599121 wishlist
Bug #599121 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: [m68k] nfeth driver vanished? no network 
connectivity!
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599121: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599121
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128623542411360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org