GDM is not starting

2011-01-09 Thread janani s
Hello everyone,

  I am facing some problems while booting up newly compiled
kernel(2.6.37).. I took the source for 2.6.37 kernel(.tar.gz) from
kernel.org website.. I have took the config file of already existing stable
2.6.32 kernel and created the debs for image and header.. When i installed
the linux-image-2.6.37 , i am not able to login looks like some problem with
GDM.. Every time i login i need to give gdm restart on the console..
Showing some error like
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0008
no IPv6 routers present
Except for this problem all other things are working properly.. So anyone
kindly suggest some solution to this problem..


Regards,
S.Janani


Bug#520928: PIIX performance regression still present in lenny's 2.6.26*

2011-01-09 Thread Witold Baryluk
Why this bug was marked
"No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.26-13lenny2. "
?

I have newest lenny kernel and problem is stil present.
(It is annoying, but becuase I have most of data on scsi disks,
IDE performance isn't very important currently beyond booting system)

r...@noisy:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads: 2 MB in  3.25 seconds = 630.59 kB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:2 MB in  3.43 seconds = 597.07 kB/sec

r...@noisy:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:24 MB in  2.02 seconds =  11.89 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:4 MB in  3.56 seconds =   1.12 MB/sec

r...@noisy:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:16 MB in  2.06 seconds =   7.78 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:4 MB in  3.14 seconds =   1.27 MB/sec
r...@noisy:~# hdparm --direct -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing O_DIRECT cached reads: 4 MB in  2.87 seconds =   1.39 MB/sec
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:6 MB in  4.36 seconds =   1.38 MB/sec
r...@noisy:~# hdparm --direct -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing O_DIRECT cached reads: 4 MB in  2.74 seconds =   1.46 MB/sec
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:6 MB in  4.37 seconds =   1.37 MB/sec

#


As one can see it is even worse than it was (my previous reports given about 
1.5 MB/s buffered disk read).


r...@noisy:~# hdparm -d /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 using_dma =  0 (off)

r...@noisy:~# hdparm -d1 /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 setting using_dma to 1 (on)
 HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Input/output error
 using_dma =  0 (off)

# dmesg | tail
[6545265.490382] hda: no DMA mode selected
[6545265.490485] hda: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4
#


r...@noisy:~# dpkg -l | grep linux-image
ii  linux-image-2.6-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 Linux 2.6 
image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4
ii  linux-image-2.6-686-smp 2.6.18+6etch3Linux 2.6 
image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 
ii  linux-image-2.6-xen-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 Linux 2.6 
image on i686, oldstyle Xen suppor
ii  linux-image-2.6.18-6-6862.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1Linux 
2.6.18 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/
ii  linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-6862.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1Linux 
2.6.18 image on i686
ii  linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-vserver-6862.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1Linux 
2.6.18 image on i686
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-6862.6.26-13lenny2  Linux 
2.6.26 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-6862.6.26-13lenny2  Linux 
2.6.26 image on i686, oldstyle Xen sup
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-2-6862.6.26-26lenny1  Linux 
2.6.26 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-6862.6.26-26lenny1  Linux 
2.6.26 image on i686, oldstyle Xen sup
r...@noisy:~# uname -a
Linux noisy 2.6.26-2-xen-686 #1 SMP Mon Aug 30 10:02:38 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux



r...@noisy:~# hdparm -iI /dev/hda

/dev/hda:

 Model=IBM-DTLA-307030, FwRev=X, SerialNo=X
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=40
 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1916kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=off
 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=60036480
 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
 PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 
 DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 
 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 
 AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255) WriteCache=enabled
 Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1:  ATA/ATAPI-2,3,4,5

 * signifies the current active mode


ATA device, with non-removable media
powers-up in standby; SET FEATURES subcmd spins-up.
Model Number:   IBM-DTLA-307030 
Serial Number:  XXX
Firmware Revision:  TX
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1 
Supported: 5 4 3 & some of 6
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders1 6383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors:   16514064
LBAuser addressable sectors:   60036480
device size with M = 1024*1024:   29314 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000:   30738 MBytes (30 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
bytes avail on r/w long: 40 Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16  Current = 0
Advanced power management level: disabled
Recommended acoustic management value: 128, current value: 254
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 *mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 
 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 
 Cycle time: no flow control=240ns  IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
   *SMA

tu busi labakais, ja spelesies ar mums

2011-01-09 Thread Juliuss_E
Patlaban karadarbiiba ir skaarusi muus visus 

tomer viss nav tik launi - tu, bez problemam, vari vinnet.

http://www.latvia-vs-russia.info - tas tik ir iespaidigs numurs :), kas tev, 
komandieri, noteikti patiks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101092348.p09nlkok018...@ns1.ipac.ac.ru



Bug#607141: xm block-attach failed on domU

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Viskup

Hello Timo,
for some reason I didn't received your question and I found it just now 
on bugs.debian.org pages.


I didn't record my previous commands but I used standard xm block-attach 
syntax from vhost config like:


'xm block-attach  phy:data/disk /dev/xvda6 w'

I am mapping LVM LV's from VG named 'data' to my vhosts.

--
Peter Viskup



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2a392c.3030...@gmail.com



Bug#607242: [PATCH v2] psmouse: mitigate failing-mouse symptoms

2011-01-09 Thread Jim Hill
Keep a failing PS/2 mouse usable until it's convenient to replace it.
Filter incoming packets: drop invalid ones and attempt to correct for
dropped bytes.

New parameter 'filter' makes filtering and logging selectable, set to 0
to shut off all effects.

Tested on AMD64, full coverage. No one else has tried this yet.

Signed-off-by: Jim Hill 

---

This is a second version, choosier about accepting apparently-valid
start bytes, no redundant test and more concise syslog and changelog
text.

This is my first patch, I hope I got the procedures right, apologies in
advance if I goofed something.

My mouse failed while in XP, but I didn't know it - it seemed it'd need
cleaning soon. On booting into Linux, it was dangerous, wild slews and
random clicks.  The difference was consistent, making it seem the
problem wasn't the mouse.

Jim
---
 drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c |  108 
 drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.h  |7 ++
 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c 
b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
index cd9d0c9..f7421ea 100644
--- a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
+++ b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
@@ -69,6 +69,22 @@ static unsigned int psmouse_resync_time;
 module_param_named(resync_time, psmouse_resync_time, uint, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resync_time, "How long can mouse stay idle before forcing 
resync (in seconds, 0 = never).");
 
+enum {
+   DROP_BAD = 1,
+   SUMMARIZE_ERRORS = 2,
+   LOG_REJECTS = 4,
+   LOG_ALL  = 8,
+   ATTEMPT_RECOVERY = 16,
+   DROP_CLAMPED = 32,
+   DROP_PACKET = DROP_CLAMPED | DROP_BAD
+};
+static unsigned int psmouse_filter = DROP_BAD | SUMMARIZE_ERRORS |
+   ATTEMPT_RECOVERY | DROP_CLAMPED;
+module_param_named(filter, psmouse_filter, uint, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter, "1 = drop invalid or hotio packets, +2=summary-log, "
+   "+4=log-rejected, +8=log-all, +16=attempt-recovery, "
+   "+32=drop-clamped.");
+
 PSMOUSE_DEFINE_ATTR(protocol, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
NULL,
psmouse_attr_show_protocol, psmouse_attr_set_protocol);
@@ -119,6 +135,85 @@ struct psmouse_protocol {
int (*init)(struct psmouse *);
 };
 
+static int psmouse_filter_packet(struct psmouse *m)
+{
+   int todo = 0;
+
+   int xoflow = m->packet[0]>>6 & 1;
+   int yoflow = m->packet[0]>>7 & 1;
+
+   if ((m->packet[0] & 0x08) != 0x08)
+   todo |= DROP_BAD + ATTEMPT_RECOVERY;
+   else if ((xoflow | yoflow) && psmouse_filter & DROP_CLAMPED)
+   todo |= DROP_CLAMPED;
+
+   if (todo & DROP_PACKET) {
+   todo |= LOG_REJECTS;
+   if (m->err_log_counter == 0)
+   m->err_log_base = m->last;
+   ++m->err_log_counter;
+   }
+
+   if (time_after(m->last, m->interval_base + HZ/m->rate)) {
+   m->interval_pkts = 0;
+   m->interval_base = m->last;
+   }
+   if (m->interval_pkts > m->rate/HZ + 1) {
+   if (m->hotio_log_counter == 0)
+   m->hotio_log_base = m->last;
+   ++m->hotio_log_counter;
+   todo |= DROP_BAD;
+   }
+   ++m->interval_pkts;
+
+   if ((todo & psmouse_filter & LOG_REJECTS) |
+   (psmouse_filter & LOG_ALL)) {
+   unsigned long long packet = 0;
+   int p;
+   for (p = 0; p < m->pktcnt; ++p)
+   packet = packet<<8 | m->packet[p];
+   printk(KERN_INFO "psmouse.c: packet %0*llx%s\n", p*2, packet,
+   todo & DROP_PACKET ? " bad" : "");
+   }
+
+   if (m->err_log_counter && time_after(m->last, m->err_log_base + HZ) &&
+   psmouse_filter & (SUMMARIZE_ERRORS | LOG_ALL)) {
+   printk(KERN_WARNING "psmouse.c: %s at %s %lu bad packets\n",
+   m->name, m->phys, m->err_log_counter);
+   m->err_log_counter = m->err_log_base = 0;
+   }
+
+   if (m->hotio_log_counter && time_after(m->last, m->hotio_log_base + HZ)
+   && psmouse_filter & (SUMMARIZE_ERRORS | LOG_ALL)) {
+   printk(KERN_WARNING "psmouse.c: %s at %s %lu excess packets\n",
+   m->name, m->phys, m->hotio_log_counter);
+   m->hotio_log_counter = m->hotio_log_base = 0;
+   }
+
+   /*
+* Take a flyer on recovery, works ok on dropped bytes. Work backwards
+* from end looking for a byte that could be a valid start-byte with
+* the same buttons down and general direction as the last good packet.
+*/
+   if (todo & psmouse_filter & ATTEMPT_RECOVERY) {
+   int p = m->pktcnt;
+   while (--p) {
+   if (m->packet[p] == m->last_mbstate) {
+   m->pktc

Bug#609455: linux-2.6: block hardlinks to non-accessible sources

2011-01-09 Thread Maximilian Gaukler

Hello Ben,

Ben Hutchings wrote:

You seem to be a bit confused about this vulnerability.  /bin/bash is of
course not suid-root, only owned by root.


You're right. To correct this: It is a big problem for suid-root binaries, but even a 
problem for non-suid-root-binaries like "/bin/bash" - if you can write to 
/bin/bash after fooling the admin to run chown on your home, you own the system as soon 
as root logs in or some shell script is started as root.

Thanks for the information about POSIX.


Many distributions apply many patches that are not upstream.  We
generally try to avoid doing that in the standard kernel images.

Do you see any way to deny the described attacks (flooding /tmp, hardlinking 
insecure suid binaries) without this patch?


However, we may add kernel images with the 'grsec' featureset for the
next release (wheezy).

That sounds good.

Thanks

Max




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2a290f.8080...@maxgaukler.de



Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-30)

2011-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-30 on Monday or Tuesday.
This will include many bug fixes from longterm release 2.6.32.28 and
elsewhere.

There is no ABI bump.  One of the bug fixes changes the ABI of the
Socket Control Message interface used to support passing file
descriptors through AF_UNIX and AF_NETLINK sockets, but we believe that
this is not used by OOT modules.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#609455: linux-2.6: block hardlinks to non-accessible sources

2011-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 17:51 +0100, Maximilian Gaukler wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> An indirect security problem in many linux systems is that a user can
> generate hardlinks to files that he may not write. I suggest adding a
> patch [1] to Debians kernel which adds a sysctl configuration option
> to forbid such hardlinks. This option should default to "allow" so
> that the default behaviour does not change.
> 
> This patch will protect against the following security problems when
> activated:
> One scenario that is described in [2] is that a user creates a
> hardlink to a suid-root binary, e.g. /bin/bash, inside his home

You seem to be a bit confused about this vulnerability.  /bin/bash is of
course not suid-root, only owned by root.

The interesting thing that can be done with suid-root binaries is to
make links to them so that if a vulnerability is discovered in them it
can be exploited even after the administrator has upgraded them.  (This
can be defended against in the package manager by removing the suid/sgid
bits before unlinking them.  I don't know whether dpkg does that yet.)

>  directory and asks the administrator to fix the permissions in this
> directory. The administrator will probably run chmod -R u+w,g+w and
> chown -R user:usergroup. Now the user is the owner of /bin/bash and
> can quickly become root.
> A rather simple case would be flooding /tmp/ with hardlinks to
> root-owned files. Even if the user is limited to a certain number of
> files, this will not be counted on his quota.
> 
> If the patch is activated, there are only few negative side effects:
> It violates POSIX specifications and might break unknown, possibly
> insecure, applications.

It doesn't violate POSIX specifications; implementations are allowed to
apply restrictions beyond the standard Unix permission checks (e.g.
SELinux).

> BTW, Ubuntu has this patch enabled by default, so it can't be too bad.

Many distributions apply many patches that are not upstream.  We
generally try to avoid doing that in the standard kernel images.

However, we may add kernel images with the 'grsec' featureset for the
next release (wheezy).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#609448: linux-source-2.6.37: source code not included for drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h?

2011-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 18:36 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Ben Hutchings  writes:
> > I do check for blobs in each new upstream version but apparently I
> > missed this one.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your work. Are you using the same deblob script or is
> there some heuristics used for new versions?

I have my own script that looks for large arrays of integer literals.  I
run that over the diff and then use my own judgement as to whether each
such array is plausibly the 'preferred form for making changes'.  (Most
of them turn out to be lookup tables for e.g. keymaps, cryptography or
radio parameters.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: your mail

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 607885 linux-2.6
Bug #607885 [installation-reports] squeeze testing di beta2 amd64 installer 
kernel panic on xenserver vm
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129459309614884.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#609448: linux-source-2.6.37: source code not included for drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h?

2011-01-09 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ben Hutchings  writes:
> I do check for blobs in each new upstream version but apparently I
> missed this one.

Thanks a lot for your work. Are you using the same deblob script or is
there some heuristics used for new versions?









-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84aajadofl@sauna.l.org



Bug#609455: linux-2.6: block hardlinks to non-accessible sources

2011-01-09 Thread Maximilian Gaukler

Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

An indirect security problem in many linux systems is that a user can generate hardlinks 
to files that he may not write. I suggest adding a patch [1] to Debians kernel which adds 
a sysctl configuration option to forbid such hardlinks. This option should default to 
"allow" so that the default behaviour does not change.

This patch will protect against the following security problems when activated:
One scenario that is described in [2] is that a user creates a hardlink to a 
suid-root binary, e.g. /bin/bash, inside his home directory and asks the 
administrator to fix the permissions in this directory. The administrator will 
probably run chmod -R u+w,g+w and chown -R user:usergroup. Now the user is the 
owner of /bin/bash and can quickly become root.
A rather simple case would be flooding /tmp/ with hardlinks to root-owned 
files. Even if the user is limited to a certain number of files, this will not 
be counted on his quota.

If the patch is activated, there are only few negative side effects:
It violates POSIX specifications and might break unknown, possibly insecure, 
applications.

BTW, Ubuntu has this patch enabled by default, so it can't be too bad.

Thanks

Max Gaukler


[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2010-May/010495.html
[2] 
http://books.google.com/books?id=x3jWs7735WgC&lpg=PA107&ots=JQDfr2tCV2&dq=hardlink%20owner&hl=de&pg=PA107#v=onepage&q=hardlink%20owner&f=false




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d29e78e.10...@maxgaukler.de



Bug#596649: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: system crash using rtl818x USB wlan

2011-01-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi,

I still had the rtl8187 error despite booting with
usbcore.autosuspend=-1 on the kernel command line.  I wondered if the
bug was being triggered by USB suspend/resume, but apparently not.  And
the rtl8187-related crash actually happened while the interface was down
(but rtl8187 module loaded).


On 07/01/11 18:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Additionally, after this error occurs, other USB devices on the same bus
> seem to break too:
> 
> [1416023.409112] generic-usb 0003:051D:0002.0003: control queue full

Actually that error could have been a different problem.  It recurred
just now without even the rtl8187 device plugged in or the module ever
having been loaded:

[20561.882890] generic-usb 0003:051D:0002.0001: control queue full

That is my APC UPS, a usbhid device.  After 654 of those messages, that
and another USB device on the same bus (USB serial port) locked up
(userland programs hang trying to use them):

[20761.723850] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[20761.732439] apcupsd   D 88008164d800 0 20649  1
0x
[20761.739891]  8800bf034000 0082 
0292
[20761.747903]  88007c92bcd8 fa40 88007c92bfd8
00016940
[20761.756018]  00016940 88008164d800 88008164daf8
00017fc0f000
[20761.764191] Call Trace:
[20761.766909]  [] ? ohci_urb_dequeue+0xd9/0xe9 [ohci_hcd]
[20761.774308]  [] ? usb_kill_urb+0x9d/0xbb [usbcore]
[20761.781219]  [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[20761.788210]  [] ? usbhid_init_reports+0x8c/0xee
[usbhid]
[20761.795684]  [] ? hiddev_ioctl+0x2bf/0x632 [usbhid]
[20761.802705]  [] ? handle_mm_fault+0x48f/0x9bb
[20761.809178]  [] ? do_uncharge_dcache+0x3d/0x51
[20761.815689]  [] ? vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x6c
[20761.821375]  [] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x48d/0x4cb
[20761.827486]  [] ? do_page_fault+0x2e0/0x2fc
[20761.833743]  [] ? sys_ioctl+0x3d/0x5c
[20761.839424]  [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

It could be relevant that my original rtl8187 lockup issue showed an
identical portion within the stack trace:

[1410483.801467]  [] ? ohci_urb_dequeue+0xd9/0xe9
[ohci_hcd]
[1410483.808842]  [] ? usb_kill_urb+0x9d/0xbb [usbcore]
[1410483.815768]  [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e

I'm not having much fun with USB recently...

Thanks,
Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d29e183.4050...@pyro.eu.org



Processed: found 609450 in 2.6.32-29

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 609450 2.6.32-29
Bug #609450 [linux-2.6] firmware-iwlwifi: since ~2weeks connection problems
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-29' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-29'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-29.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12945900733172.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#609448: linux-source-2.6.37: source code not included for drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h?

2011-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 17:26 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.37
> Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
> Severity: serious
> 
> drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h seems to contain firmware
> in binary form. Is the source code available somewhere?
[...]

I do check for blobs in each new upstream version but apparently I
missed this one.

For what it's worth, we're not building this driver, so this doesn't end
up in any linux-image package.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: reassign 609407 to linux-2.6

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 609407 linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
Bug #609407 [linux-2.6] firmware-iwlwifi: Can't resume from hibernate due to 
iwlagn
Ignoring request to reassign bug #609407 to the same package
Bug #609407 [linux-2.6] firmware-iwlwifi: Can't resume from hibernate due to 
iwlagn
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-29' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-29'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-29.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609407
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12945897061060.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 606976 debian-installer
Bug #606976 [linux-2.6] Kernel panic with Squeeze (AMD64) d-i beta 2
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129458944732360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#606976:

2011-01-09 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
i got this info on #debian-boot which may help:

- the message points to a missing initramfs
- you get this message if no initramfs is around, so unless mistaken
this smells isolinux to me.
- I'd ask him to try the dailies, irc isolinux got fixes for broken
bios'es.

So, can you try with the dailies?


-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1294589223.2400.111.ca...@eeepc.belkin



Processed: reassign 609450 to linux-2.6

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 609450 linux-2.6
Bug #609450 [firmware-iwlwifi] firmware-iwlwifi: since ~2weeks connection 
problems
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-iwlwifi' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions firmware-nonfree/0.27.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129458874128515.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#609450: firmware-iwlwifi: since ~2weeks connection problems

2011-01-09 Thread Stefan Krueger
Subject: firmware-iwlwifi: since ~2weeks connection problems -- direct probe to 
AP
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.27
Severity: important

*** Please type your report below this line ***

Since 2weeks I have connection Problems(after an apt-get update; apt-get 
upgrade) with my iwl3945 Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG. 
Now, I dont become an connection to my router, i dont know why, before the 2 
weeks all works very fine.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

firmware-iwlwifi depends on no packages.

firmware-iwlwifi recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-iwlwifi suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools   0.98.7 tools for generating an initramfs
ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 [lin 2.6.32-29  Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs

-- no debconf information

**uname -a
Linux squeezy 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Fri Dec 10 16:12:40 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux

**lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
usbhid 28008  0 
hid50873  1 usbhid
iwl394546032  0 
rndis_host  4359  0 
cdc_ether   2633  1 rndis_host
usbnet  9527  2 rndis_host,cdc_ether
mii 2714  1 usbnet
usb_storage30541  0 
iwlcore67478  1 iwl3945
mac80211  123574  2 iwl3945,iwlcore
cfg80211   87657  3 iwl3945,iwlcore,mac80211
acpi_cpufreq4951  1 
cpufreq_conservative 4018  0 
cpufreq_userspace   1480  0 
cpufreq_powersave602  0 
cpufreq_stats   1940  0 
parport_pc 15799  0 
ppdev   4058  0 
lp  5570  0 
parport22554  3 parport_pc,ppdev,lp
sco 5857  2 
bridge 33019  0 
stp  996  1 bridge
bnep7444  2 
rfcomm 25171  8 
l2cap  21705  16 bnep,rfcomm
kvm_intel  32860  0 
uinput  4796  1 
kvm   182779  1 kvm_intel
nls_utf8 908  1 
nls_cp437   4489  1 
vfat6570  1 
fat34912  1 vfat
coretemp3401  0 
loop9765  0 
firewire_sbp2   9647  0 
snd_hda_codec_realtek   163282  1 
joydev  6739  0 
arc4 974  2 
ecb 1405  2 
snd_hda_intel  16787  2 
i915  222064  2 
drm_kms_helper 18301  1 i915
snd_hda_codec  46002  2 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel
btusb   8077  2 
drm   112088  3 i915,drm_kms_helper
psmouse44657  0 
i2c_algo_bit3497  1 i915
snd_hwdep   4054  1 snd_hda_codec
bluetooth  36319  9 sco,bnep,rfcomm,l2cap,btusb
serio_raw   2916  0 
wmi 3575  0 
processor  26327  3 acpi_cpufreq
snd_pcm47222  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
button  3598  1 i915
video  14605  1 i915
battery 3782  0 
evdev   5609  19 
snd_seq35463  0 
snd_timer  12258  2 snd_pcm,snd_seq
snd_seq_device  3673  1 snd_seq
rfkill 10264  3 cfg80211,bluetooth
i2c_i8016462  0 
i2c_core   12696  5 i915,drm_kms_helper,drm,i2c_algo_bit,i2c_i801
output  1204  1 video
snd34375  12 
snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device
soundcore   3450  1 snd
snd_page_alloc  5045  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
ac  1640  0 
pcspkr  1207  0 
ext4  257803  2 
mbcache 3762  1 ext4
jbd2   56155  1 ext4
crc16   1027  2 l2cap,ext4
sg 15968  0 
sd_mod 25969  5 
crc_t10dif  1012  1 sd_mod
sr_mod 10770  0 
cdrom  26487  1 sr_mod
ata_generic 2067  0 
uhci_hcd   16057  0 
firewire_ohci  16725  0 
sdhci_pci   4525  0 
sdhci  12147  1 sdhci_pci
ata_piix   17736  0 
tg388273  0 
ahci   27270  4 
libata115753  3 ata_generic,ata_piix,ahci
ricoh_mmc   2561  0 
firewire_core  31235  2 firewire_sbp2,firewire_ohci
crc_itu_t   1035  1 firewire_core
mmc_core   38665  1 sdhci
ehci_hcd   27851  0 
led_class   1757  3 iwl3945,iwlcore,sdhci
libphy 11638  1 tg3
thermal 9206  0 
thermal_sys 9378 

Processed: your mail

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 606976 linux-2.6
Bug #606976 [installation-reports] Kernel panic with Squeeze (AMD64) d-i beta 2
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12945874798.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#609448: linux-source-2.6.37: source code not included for drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h?

2011-01-09 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: linux-source-2.6.37
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: serious

drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h seems to contain firmware
in binary form. Is the source code available somewhere?

(This is the only blob I could find with
http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.37-libre/deblob-2.6.37)

$ head -n50 linux-source-2.6.37/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/boot.h
//---
// FT1000 driver for Flarion Flash OFDM NIC Device
//
// Copyright (C) 2002 Flarion Technologies, All rights reserved.
//
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
// under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
// Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any
// later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be 
useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 
MERCHANTABILITY
// or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
// more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
// License along with this program; if not, write to the
// Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place -
// Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
//---
//
// File: boot.h
//
// Description:boatloader
//
// History:
// 1/11/05WhcPorted to Linux.
//
//---
#ifndef _BOOTH_
#define _BOOTH_

// Official bootloader
unsigned char bootimage [] = {
0x00,0x00,0x01,0x5E,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x02,0xD7
,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x5E,0x46,0xB3
,0xE6,0x02,0x00,0x98,0xE6,0x8C
,0x00,0x98,0xFB,0x92,0xFF,0xFF
,0x98,0xFB,0x94,0xFF,0xFF,0x98
,0xFB,0x06,0x08,0x00,0x98,0xFB
,0x96,0x84,0x00,0x98,0xFB,0x08
,0x1C,0x00,0x98,0xFB,0x51,0x25
,0x10,0x1C,0x00,0xE6,0x51,0x01
,0x07,0xFD,0x4C,0xFF,0x20,0xF5
,0x51,0x02,0x20,0x08,0x00,0x4C
,0xFF,0x20,0x3C,0x00,0xC0,0x64
,0x98,0xC0,0x66,0x98,0xC0,0x68
,0x98,0xC0,0x6A,0x98,0xC0,0x6C
,0x98,0x90,0x08,0x90,0x09,0x90
,0x0A,0x90,0x0B,0x90,0x0C,0x90
,0x0D,0x90,0x0E,0x90,0x0F,0x90
,0x04,0x90,0x06,0xFB,0x51,0x22
,0x16,0x08,0x03,0xFB,0x51,0x52
...



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84ei8mdro6@sauna.l.org



Bug#592943: Confirmed in linux-image-2.6.37-rc7

2011-01-09 Thread Oliver Sander

I just tried linux-image-2.6.37-rc7 from experimental.  The problem is still 
there.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d29d11b.5020...@mi.fu-berlin.de



Processed: reassign 609407 to linux-2.6

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 609407 linux-2.6
Bug #609407 [firmware-iwlwifi] firmware-iwlwifi: Can't resume from hibernate 
due to iwlagn
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-iwlwifi' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions firmware-nonfree/0.27.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609407
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12945670926001.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#609407: firmware-iwlwifi: Can't resume from hibernate due to iwlagn

2011-01-09 Thread harven
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.27
Severity: normal

I recently upgraded debian squeeze a week ago and now I have a problem with
hibernate, which is related to iwlagn. Everything was working fine before the
upgrade.

This is on a Dell Latitude E6400. That computer has a switch on its right side,
that enable/disable wifi and bluetooth. Starting the computer with that switch
off (I don't use wifi often), everything works fine. Then I put the computer
into hibernate mode (either through the menu or with pm-hibernate).
The computer goes to sleep. At wake up, the following message is printed
on screen.

[2282-124196] iwlagn 000:0c:00.0: MAC is in deep sleep! CSR_GP_CNTRL = 0xOOO
 repeated several times
[2282-124196] iwlagn 000:0c:00.0: Hardware error detected. Restarting
[2282-62340] hub 3.0: 1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 1

Then, nothing else and a hard reboot is needed.

The problem does not appear if the wifi switch is on. So my guess is, it tries
to
find the wifi after waking up even if it is not enabled, and fails in that
case.
The problem also appears sometimes when suspending the computer,
but not always.

Sidenote: the only wifi related packages on the computer are
firmware-iwlwifi and wireless-tools.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

firmware-iwlwifi depends on no packages.

firmware-iwlwifi recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-iwlwifi suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools 0.98.6   tools for generating an initramfs
ii  linux-image-2.6.30-2-68 2.6.30-8squeeze1 Linux 2.6.30 image on PPro/Celeron
ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-68 2.6.32-29Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110109094836.4585.97070.report...@ergodik.univ-brest.fr