Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Processed: reassign 617743 alsa-driver

2011-04-01 Thread Tarek Soliman
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
  * Debian Bug Tracking System [110331 03:39 +]:
   Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
   
reassign 617743 alsa-driver
   Bug #617743 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-686: found another USB midi 
   cable with a 4 byte limit
   Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'alsa-driver'.
   Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.37-2.
  
  This can be fixed easy to the alsa-source package. The fix will then
  be valid for users who build their alsa-drivers from alsa-source.
  But people using alsa drivers from Debian's kernel won't, though.
  
 I agree it should be fixed in linux-2.6.  But it should be accepted
 upstream first, and filing a bug in the upstream bug tracker is
 probably not the way to get this done!

What is the correct way to get this accepted upstream?
-- 
Tarek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401060328.GA10032@zeus.olympus



Bug#619827: linux-source-2.6.38: [linux-dvb] cx88-blackbird broken (since 2.6.37)

2011-04-01 Thread Andreas Huber

Continuing Ben's work, I fixed all remaining issues.

Patch was uploaded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31962

Everything works fine for me now.

regards
Andi



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d957020.1040...@gmx.at



Re: Bug#619827: linux-source-2.6.38: [linux-dvb] cx88-blackbird broken (since 2.6.37)

2011-04-01 Thread Andreas Huber
Continuing Ben's work, I fixed all remaining issues.

Patch was uploaded to 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31962

Everything works fine for me now.

regards
Andi 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20110401t082954...@post.gmane.org



Bug#620331: linux-2.6: igb driver fix for management card detection

2011-04-01 Thread Julien-externe BLACHE
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi,

The igb driver up to 2.6.34 uses an incorrect check to detect the presence 
of a management card sharing the network interface.

This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or the 
management card eventually.

The fix from upstream applies cleanly to 2.6.32 and is attached to this 
bug report for convenience.

Thanks,

JB.

-- 
Consultant INTM - Debian Developer - TMI Calibre
EDF - DSP - CSP IT - ITS Rhône Alpes - C4S - CCNPS
04 69 65 68 56





Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes (ci-après le 'Message') sont établis à 
l'intention exclusive des destinataires et les informations qui y figurent sont 
strictement confidentielles. Toute utilisation de ce Message non conforme à sa 
destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication totale ou partielle, est 
interdite sauf autorisation expresse.

Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce Message, il vous est interdit de le 
copier, de le faire suivre, de le divulguer ou d'en utiliser tout ou partie. Si 
vous avez reçu ce Message par erreur, merci de le supprimer de votre système, 
ainsi que toutes ses copies, et de n'en garder aucune trace sur quelque support 
que ce soit. Nous vous remercions également d'en avertir immédiatement 
l'expéditeur par retour du message.

Il est impossible de garantir que les communications par messagerie 
électronique arrivent en temps utile, sont sécurisées ou dénuées de toute 
erreur ou virus.


This message and any attachments (the 'Message') are intended solely for the 
addressees. The information contained in this Message is confidential. Any use 
of information contained in this Message not in accord with its purpose, any 
dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except 
formal approval.

If you are not the addressee, you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any 
part of it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and 
all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return message.

E-mail communication cannot be guaranteed to be timely secure, error or 
virus-free.


igb-use-correct-bits-to-identify-if-manageability-is-enabled.patch
Description: Binary data


Processed: Re: Bug#620297: base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 620297 linux-2.6
Bug #620297 [base] base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree
Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'linux-2.6'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
620297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13016460639001.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#619371: [Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

2011-04-01 Thread Amaya
reassign 619371 linux-2.6 
thanks

Hi there kernel maintainers, please take a look at this bug, I am at
loss at to which package might be responsible for the issue described.
Thanks!

Christian Andretzky wrote:
 Package: base
 Severity: important
 Tags: squeeze
 
 Until lenny we could use this machines with no problems. But with squeeze the 
 wake on lan function does no longer work.
 I've tried a lot of things but I could not get it working. The machine(s) 
 simply do not wake up. If the Machine was
 powered off from the parallel installe Win XP, the wakeup works.
 
 I could also see, that the wakeup does not work if the machine was powered 
 off from a system like Knoppix or SysrescueCD
 which also use newer kernels. So I assume, it must have something todo with 
 the way, the kernel handles PME events.
 
 The variable NETDOWN in /etc/default/halt is set to 'no'. 
 
 Unfortunately in this special case wake on lan is the only way to wake up the 
 machine(s) for maintenance and other things. Time controlled wakeup
 is not available.
 
 Here a list of the installed kernel-related packages:
 
 ii  firmware-linux-free  2.6.32-30
  Binary firmware for various drivers in the Linux kernel
 ii  firmware-linux-nonfree   0.28 
  Binary firmware for various drivers in the Linux kernel
 ii  linux-base   2.6.32-30
  Linux image base package
 ii  linux-doc-2.61:2.6.32+29  
  Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6 
 (meta-package)
 ii  linux-doc-2.6.32 2.6.32-30
  Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.32
 ii  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64 2.6.32-30
  Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64
 ii  linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common2.6.32-30
  Common header files for Linux 2.6.32-5
 ii  linux-image-2.6-amd642.6.32+29
  Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
 ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64   2.6.32-30
  Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs
 ii  linux-kbuild-2.6.32  2.6.32-1 
  Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.32
 ii  linux-libc-dev   2.6.32-30
  Linux support headers for userspace development
 ii  linux-manual-2.6.32  2.6.32-30
  Linux kernel API manual pages for version 2.6.32
 ii  linux-patch-nfs-ngroups  
 4.58.debian.20100106.1Client-side bypassing of ngroups limitation 
 in NFS protocol
 ii  linux-sound-base 1.0.23+dfsg-2
  base package for ALSA and OSS sound systems
 ii  linux-wlan-ng0.2.9+dfsg-4 
  utilities for wireless prism2 cards
 ii  linux-wlan-ng-doc0.2.9+dfsg-4 
  documentation for wlan-ng
 ii  linux-wlan-ng-firmware   0.2.9+dfsg-4 
  firmware files used by the linux-wlan-ng driver
 ii  linux-wlan-ng-source 0.2.9+dfsg-4 
  linux-wlan-ng driver
 
 
 TIA for Your help.
 
 Christian
 
 P.S. Different from the apt-policy below only stable packages are installed.
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 6.0
   APT prefers stable
   APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 
 
 ___
 Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers mailing list
 virtual-pkg-base-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/virtual-pkg-base-maintainers

-- 
 .''`.  Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
: :' : -- The life of David Gale
`. `'   
  `-Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401095736.GL4573@aenima



Processed: Re: [Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 619371 linux-2.6
Bug #619371 [linux-2.6] base: wake on lan does not work with some special type 
of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)
Ignoring request to reassign bug #619371 to the same package
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130165236425625.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies; adding linux-version command

2011-04-01 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Hello, all. I'm not a packager but GRUB2 upstream maintainer and so I'll
speak from our point of view.
 Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies
Go for it. These files are just a nuisance
 As I understand it, the main reason for these is to allow boot loaders
 to be configured using the unversioned link names, so that neither users
 nor maintainers have to update the configuration for new kernel
 versions.
   
Hm, goal not really accomplished. But I'll provide some GRUB2
configuration snippets to accomplish this with scanning the kernel list
at boot time if some admins don't want to rely on update-grub being
correctly run. These scripts would just be an alternative, not default.
 - Comparing and sort versions (grub gets this wrong)

   
Trouble comes from Debian adopting seemingly unpredictable version
suffixes. Could you perhaps provide a spec on how to compile 2 Linux
versions so we all get it right and done in the same way?
 With version 3.2 of linux-base, I've added the command 'linux-version'
 which should make these things easier, and should help you to generate
 kernel version menus without the aid of links.
   
Haven't checked it yet. However I would like to avoid using
debian-specific tool if possible. So I'd prefer a spec.

-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies; adding linux-version command

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 13:49 +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
 Hello, all. I'm not a packager but GRUB2 upstream maintainer and so I'll
 speak from our point of view.
  Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies
 Go for it. These files are just a nuisance
  As I understand it, the main reason for these is to allow boot loaders
  to be configured using the unversioned link names, so that neither users
  nor maintainers have to update the configuration for new kernel
  versions.

 Hm, goal not really accomplished. But I'll provide some GRUB2
 configuration snippets to accomplish this with scanning the kernel list
 at boot time if some admins don't want to rely on update-grub being
 correctly run. These scripts would just be an alternative, not default.
  - Comparing and sort versions (grub gets this wrong)
 

 Trouble comes from Debian adopting seemingly unpredictable version
 suffixes.

No it doesn't.  '-rcN' is just as problematic as '-trunk'.

 Could you perhaps provide a spec on how to compile 2 Linux
 versions so we all get it right and done in the same way?
  With version 3.2 of linux-base, I've added the command 'linux-version'
  which should make these things easier, and should help you to generate
  kernel version menus without the aid of links.

 Haven't checked it yet. However I would like to avoid using
 debian-specific tool if possible. So I'd prefer a spec.

There isn't an official spec.  However the source and unit tests for the
DebianLinux Perl module (added to linux-base to support this command)
explain the rules I came up with.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#620297: [Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#620297: base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree

2011-04-01 Thread Brandon Metcalf
This is the only version on which I have seen this behavior.  It's
also the first version using flush-8:0 instead of pdflush that I've
tried.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Amaya am...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi, Brandon

 Can you reproduce this with other kernel versions?

 Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 Package: base
 Severity: important

 After a system running squeeze has been under constant load, the load
 averages in /proc/loadavg seem to be calculated incorrectly with
 /proc/loadavg showing values that are much too low.  Below is vmstat
 output along with the contents of /proc/loadavg.  The fourth field
 of /proc/loadavg seems correct, but the 1-minute avg is definitely wrong:

 vmstat:
 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- cpu
  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
 11  0      0 12569200  22832 7468824    0    0     9   135   22   96 39  3 
 58  0
 loadavg:
 0.34 4.98 6.47 10/468 13072
 vmstat:
 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- cpu
  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
 15  0      0 12566340  22832 7469612    0    0     9   135   23   96 39  3 
 58  0
 loadavg:
 0.34 4.98 6.47 16/468 13075

 Although this is just two samples, the behavior is consistent over a long
 period of time.


 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 6.0.1
   APT prefers stable
   APT policy: (500, 'stable')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



 ___
 Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers mailing list
 virtual-pkg-base-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/virtual-pkg-base-maintainers

 --
  .''`.  Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
 : :' :                 -- The life of David Gale
 `. `'
  `-    Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=2sl9onuf_d82xnpnkmmk4upwre0r539nq1...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#521646: Not possible to rebuild debian/control

2011-04-01 Thread Adrian Glaubitz
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #521646

Hi,

the problem still exists in the current release of linux-kbuild-2.6.
Simply adding a new entry to the changelog and invoking 'debuild'
without any parameters will gencontrol let fail rebuilding
debian/control. If the changelog isn't altered, the package
builds fine.

Adrian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401124349.15549.28391.reportbug@unstable



Bug#611750: Bug#613790: 2nd update (Re: Bug#613790: pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate)

2011-04-01 Thread Frédéric Boiteux
Hello Ben,

  I've run the 2.6.32-31 Debian kernel without the identified faulty
patch
(x86-hotplug-use-mwait-to-offline-a-processor-fix-the-legacy-case.patch)
since about two weeks, using multiple hibernation cycles, without any
problem. I don't know if other people involved tried this also ?
What are you plans about this bug ? Did you reported it upstream to the
kernel devs ? Do you plan to revert it in next Debian kernel release ?

  Thanks for your feedback,
Fred.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401150331.7de17cb8@prem6s



Processed: tagging 620204

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 620204 + pending
Bug #620204 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: FTBFS on armel: ERROR: __bad_udelay
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
620204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130166413610559.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#620204: linux-2.6: FTBFS on armel: ERROR: __bad_udelay

2011-04-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Hector Oron zu...@debian.org [2011-03-31 03:11]:
   A possible fix can be found at:
   
 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8c6113cd03c7e927f5ee5f6ad98e155ef2d27177

Thanks a lot!  Applied.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401132219.ga4...@jirafa.cyrius.com



Re: Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies; adding linux-version command

2011-04-01 Thread Jason Fleischli
Elilo's perspective
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 04:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 With version 3.2 of linux-base, I've added the command 'linux-version'
 which should make these things easier, and should help you to generate
 kernel version menus without the aid of links.
[Added the command 'linux-version' to what?]
the elilo efi binary doesnt generate a kernel list and loads versioned
filenames from the local efi boot partition defined in elilo.conf under
versioned labels just fine. 
The elilo efi binary wouldnt need any change. Only the elilo debian
script would need to be changed to accomodate that I believe.

 
 If there are any remaining reasons to continue using the unversioned
 links, or additional features you think linux-version should provide,
 please let us know.
No objections.

was this adequate feedback?

-Jason


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301668183.9288.6.camel@charlene



Bug#521646: Not possible to rebuild debian/control

2011-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 02:43:49PM +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
 the problem still exists in the current release of linux-kbuild-2.6.
 Simply adding a new entry to the changelog and invoking 'debuild'
 without any parameters will gencontrol let fail rebuilding
 debian/control. If the changelog isn't altered, the package
 builds fine.

And what could possibly the error message?

Bastian

-- 
Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401151335.ga29...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org



Re: Re: No build target for -xen-amd64 in Squeeze (2.6.32-5) ?

2011-04-01 Thread Matt
Thanks Ben,

that was too easy wasn't it. Happily compiling 

Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d95ee91.7080...@bannach.net



Re: Dropping unversioned kernel links/copies; adding linux-version command

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:29:43AM -0600, Jason Fleischli wrote:
 Elilo's perspective
 On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 04:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  With version 3.2 of linux-base, I've added the command 'linux-version'
  which should make these things easier, and should help you to generate
  kernel version menus without the aid of links.
 [Added the command 'linux-version' to what?]

As I said, 'version 3.2 of linux-base'.

 the elilo efi binary doesnt generate a kernel list and loads versioned
 filenames from the local efi boot partition defined in elilo.conf under
 versioned labels just fine. 
 The elilo efi binary wouldnt need any change. Only the elilo debian
 script would need to be changed to accomodate that I believe.
[...]

Yes, and that is what I am concerned with.  I don't believe any of
the boot loaders themselves would have trouble with using full names.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401154417.gc2...@decadent.org.uk



Bug#521646: marked as done (linux-kbuild-2.6: Not possible to rebuild debian/control)

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:46:20 +0100
with message-id 20110401154620.gd2...@decadent.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#521646: Not possible to rebuild debian/control
has caused the Debian Bug report #521646,
regarding linux-kbuild-2.6: Not possible to rebuild debian/control
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
521646: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521646
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6

Hi,

trying to rebuild debian/control with or without local modifications to
control.source.in fails:

[...]
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6'
chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py
debian/bin/gencontrol.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File debian/bin/gencontrol.py, line 6, in ?
from debian_linux.debian import *
ImportError: No module named debian_linux.debian
make[1]: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-kbuild-2.6'
make: *** [debian/control] Error 2
(sid_i386)user@debian:~/linux-kbuild-2.6$

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 02:43:49PM +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
 Package: linux-kbuild-2.6
 Followup-For: Bug #521646
 
 Hi,
 
 the problem still exists in the current release of linux-kbuild-2.6.
 Simply adding a new entry to the changelog and invoking 'debuild'
 without any parameters will gencontrol let fail rebuilding
 debian/control. If the changelog isn't altered, the package
 builds fine.

Use dpkg-buildpackage and it will tell you the problem.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus

---End Message---


Bug#521646: Not possible to rebuild debian/control

2011-04-01 Thread Adrian Glaubitz

On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 02:43:49PM +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
 the problem still exists in the current release of linux-kbuild-2.6.
 Simply adding a new entry to the changelog and invoking 'debuild'
 without any parameters will gencontrol let fail rebuilding
 debian/control. If the changelog isn't altered, the package
 builds fine.
 
 And what could possibly the error message?

It's exactly the same as in the original post by Daniel. That's
why I wasn't posting it again.

Adrian



kbuild_debuild.out
Description: Binary data


Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Processed: reassign 617743 alsa-driver

2011-04-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tarek Soliman [110401 01:03 -0500]:
 On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
   * Debian Bug Tracking System [110331 03:39 +]:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 617743 alsa-driver
Bug #617743 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-686: found another USB 
midi cable with a 4 byte limit
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'alsa-driver'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.37-2.
   
   This can be fixed easy to the alsa-source package. The fix will then
   be valid for users who build their alsa-drivers from alsa-source.
   But people using alsa drivers from Debian's kernel won't, though.
   
  I agree it should be fixed in linux-2.6.  But it should be accepted
  upstream first, and filing a bug in the upstream bug tracker is
  probably not the way to get this done!
 
 What is the correct way to get this accepted upstream?

AFAIK http://lkml.org/

Elimar
-- 
  The path to source is always uphill!
-unknown-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401181431.ga2...@samweis.home.lxtec.de



Bug#620059: Acknowledgement (nfs-kernel: Starting NFS kernel daemon: nfsd mountd failed!)

2011-04-01 Thread Nigel Horne
Getting nowhere on this.  I tried uninstalling and re-installing but got this.

sh-4.1# apt-get install nfs-kernel-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  nfs-kernel-server
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 153 kB of archives.
After this operation, 406 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main nfs-kernel-server i386 
1:1.2.3-1 [153 kB]
Fetched 153 kB in 1s (105 kB/s) 
Selecting previously deselected package nfs-kernel-server.
(Reading database ... 111892 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking nfs-kernel-server (from .../nfs-kernel-server_1%3a1.2.3-1_i386.deb) 
...
Processing triggers for readahead-fedora ...
Processing triggers for readahead ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up nfs-kernel-server (1:1.2.3-1) ...

Creating config file /etc/exports with new version

Creating config file /etc/default/nfs-kernel-server with new version
insserv: warning: script 'K02breakinguard' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'breakinguard' missing LSB tags and overrides
Starting NFS common utilities: statd failed!
invoke-rc.d: initscript nfs-common, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing nfs-kernel-server (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
configured to not write apport reports
  Errors were encountered while processing:
 nfs-kernel-server
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/locale: 0 KiB
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/man: 0 KiB
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/omf: 0 KiB

Total disk space freed by localepurge: 0 KiB

E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
sh-4.1# dpkg-reconfigure nfs-kernel-server
/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: nfs-kernel-server is broken or not fully installed
sh-4.1# 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#620059: Acknowledgement (nfs-kernel: Starting NFS kernel daemon: nfsd mountd failed!)

2011-04-01 Thread Nigel Horne
Replacing portmap with rpcbind also worked for me.  Thanks for the tip.

-Nigel

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#611750: Bug#613790: 2nd update (Re: Bug#613790: pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate)

2011-04-01 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
One more datapoint :

I also upgraded to 2.6.32.31 as packaged in testing, without further
problems on my 1005PE. I have used it since its apparition in testing
(that's 8 days and 8 hours according to uptime), using my machine as
usual (meaning 2-5 hibernations per day) without shutdown or reboot.

Other models may be pickier ?

HTH,
Emmanuel Charpentier

Le vendredi 01 avril 2011 à 15:03 +0200, Frédéric Boiteux a écrit :
   Hello Ben,
 
   I've run the 2.6.32-31 Debian kernel without the identified faulty
 patch
 (x86-hotplug-use-mwait-to-offline-a-processor-fix-the-legacy-case.patch)
 since about two weeks, using multiple hibernation cycles, without any
 problem. I don't know if other people involved tried this also ?
 What are you plans about this bug ? Did you reported it upstream to the
 kernel devs ? Do you plan to revert it in next Debian kernel release ?
 
   Thanks for your feedback,
 Fred.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1301684635.2727.193.ca...@portable-ec.bacbuc.dyndns.org



Processed: Re: Same problem found in 2.6.26-2-amd64

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 518643 moreinfo
Bug #518643 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: kvm host machine crashes 
with backtrace reference to kvm mmu call
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
518643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130168706721210.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#600656: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Crash after nullpointer dereference during gparted reading a disk

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:20:00AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:41 +0200, Andreas Feldner wrote:
  Hi Ben,
  
  somehow netconsole doesn't do anything for me. But it turned out the the 
  system behaviour is not exactly reproducible and anyway I can see the 
  messages 
  on screen if X is not started (because nvidia module banned ;-) ).
  
  So, here I have the following error message, hope that helps!
 [...]
 
 OK, this looks really weird.  I looked for reports of similar crashes
 and found http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/11/302 which apparently turned
 out to be due to a hardware fault.
 
 Could you test Linux 2.6.36 as packaged in experimental?  If that has
 the same problem, try running memtest86+ for a while to check whether
 this is due to bad RAM.  I suspect it isn't, but we have to check.

Andreas, did you test later kernels (now also in unstable) and memtest?

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401193501.GA11579@pisco.westfalen.local



Processed: tagging 516785

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 516785 + moreinfo
Bug #516785 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R 
cassini network driver kernel panic
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
516785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130168757823205.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: sata hd freezes with heavy load

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 510471 moreinfo
Bug #510471 [linux-2.6] sata hd freezes with heavy load
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
510471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130168757323165.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: [kernel] mount.cifs fails to mount MS DFS shares (object is remote)

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 504584 moreinfo
Bug #504584 [linux-2.6] [kernel] mount.cifs fails to mount MS DFS shares 
(object is remote)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
504584: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504584
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130168824825258.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#620421: nfs-kernel-server: init script depends on non-existent ‘/dev/tcp/’

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Finney
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.2-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch

The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on a
non-existent directory:

=
# See if portmap or rpcbind are running
(cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111) 2/dev/null
RET=$?
if [ $RET != 0 ]; then
echo
log_warning_msg Not starting: portmap daemon is not 
running
exit 0
fi
=

This results in the script failing, with “Not starting: portmap daemon
is not running”.

That's nothing to do with the portmapper service. It's because there is
no such directory ‘/dev/tcp/’ on this machine:

$ ls /dev/tcp/
ls: cannot access /dev/tcp/: No such file or directory

To check for the portmapper service, the ‘rpcinfo(1)’ tool is provided.
Using that program, we can see that the service is running on this
machine:

$ rpcinfo -t localhost portmapper
program 10 version 2 ready and waiting

The following patch uses this test, which works in current “Wheezy”.

=== modified file 'init.d/nfs-kernel-server'
--- old/init.d/nfs-kernel-server2011-04-01 12:03:38 +
+++ new/init.d/nfs-kernel-server2011-04-01 19:51:56 +
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
log_progress_msg nfsd
 
-   # See if portmap or rpcbind are running
-   (cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111) 2/dev/null
+   # See if the portmapper service is running.
+   (rpcinfo -t localhost portmapper) /dev/null 2/dev/null
RET=$?
if [ $RET != 0 ]; then
echo


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (900, 'stable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-powerpc64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_AU.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii  libblkid1   2.17.2-9.1   block device id library
ii  libc6   2.11.2-11Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcomerr2  1.41.12-2common error description library
ii  libgssapi-krb5-21.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k
ii  libgssglue1 0.1-4mechanism-switch gssapi library
ii  libk5crypto31.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C
ii  libkrb5-3   1.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libnfsidmap20.24-1   An nfs idmapping library
ii  librpcsecgss3   0.19-2   allows secure rpc communication us
ii  libwrap07.6.q-19 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  lsb-base3.2-27   Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  nfs-common  1:1.2.2-5NFS support files common to client
ii  ucf 3.0025+nmu1  Update Configuration File: preserv

nfs-kernel-server recommends no packages.

nfs-kernel-server suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739m1vj1w@benfinney.id.au



Bug#504584: [kernel] mount.cifs fails to mount MS DFS shares (object is remote)

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
tags 504584 moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:35:05PM +0100, ulrich.me...@ulmeco.ch wrote:
 Package: kernel
 Version: 2.6.26
 Severity: important
 
 --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
 unable to mount microsoft dfs share
 
 as root:
 mount -t cifs -o credentials=/root/user.txt -o workgroup=WG -o rw
 //test.domain.de/DB_001/Project/BO2 /root/bo2
 
 error message: object is remote
 
 the same share can be accessed using smbclient.
 
 (Ubuntu 8.1 with 2.6.27 does not work either)

Does is work with more recent kernels, e.g. the version from Debian
Squeeze (6.0)?

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401200416.GA14548@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#510471: sata hd freezes with heavy load

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
tags 510471 moreinfo
thanks

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:14:56AM +0100, Luigi Pizzirani wrote:
 Package: linux-source-2.6.26
 Version: 2.6.26-12
 Severity: important
 
 
 -- no debconf information
 
 Info related to this bug in my dmesg:
 
 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  SAMSUNG HM121HI  LZ10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
 
 ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
 [   68.392430] ata1.00: cmd 60/90:00:69:f3:3b/00:00:0c:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 
 73728 in
 [   68.392432]  res 40/00:fe:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 
 (timeout)
 [   68.392437] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
 [   68.392446] ata1.00: cmd 60/10:08:4e:74:cd/00:00:03:00:00/40 tag 1 ncq 
 8192 in
 [   68.392448]  res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 
 (timeout)
 [   68.392455] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
 [   68.392463] ata1.00: cmd 60/14:10:7e:ba:cc/00:00:03:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 
 10240 in
 [   68.392466]  res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 
 (timeout)
 [   68.392472] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
 [   68.392480] ata1: hard resetting link
 [   68.697415] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 [   68.702840] ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.702840] ata1.00: ACPI cmd b1/c1:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.702840] ata1.00: ACPI cmd c6/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
 [   68.702840] ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/10:03:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.713986] ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.713994] ata1.00: ACPI cmd b1/c1:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.714701] ata1.00: ACPI cmd c6/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
 [   68.714709] ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/10:03:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
 [   68.718848] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
 [   68.730700] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
 [   68.730700] ata1: EH complete

Sorry for the late reply.

Does this error still occur with more recent kernels, e.g. the kernel
from Debian 6.0 (squeeze)?

Cheers,
Moritz





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401193901.GA11990@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:30:05PM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 09:29:25AM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote:
  I tried again with vanilla 2.6.32 (2.6.27-2.6.31 are unusable due to a 
  kernel
  memory corruption bug), the driver is still crashing my Sunfire V480R.
 
 Tried today vanilla 2.6.33, then did a:
 
 # modprobe -v cassini cassini_debug=-1
 insmod /lib/modules/2.6.33/kernel/drivers/net/cassini.ko cassini_debug=-1
 
 In kern.log the messages appeared:
 
 Mar  1 12:17:14 tantalus kernel: cassini.c:v1.6 (21 May 2008)
 Mar  1 12:17:14 tantalus kernel: PCI: Enabling device: (0002:00:02.0), cmd 146
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: cassini: MAC address not found in ROM VPD
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: eth0: Sun Cassini+ (64bit/33MHz PCI/Cu) 
 Ethernet[24] 08:00:20:cb:31:01
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: PCI: Enabling device: (0003:00:01.0), cmd 146
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: cassini: MAC address not found in ROM VPD
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: udev: renamed network interface eth0 to eth15
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: eth0: Sun Cassini+ (64bit/66MHz PCI/Cu) 
 Ethernet[30] 08:00:20:bc:c7:b7
 Mar  1 12:17:15 tantalus kernel: udev: renamed network interface eth0 to eth16
 Mar  1 12:20:48 tantalus kernel: eth15: Link up at 1000 Mbps, full-duplex.
 Mar  1 12:20:48 tantalus kernel: eth15: TX pause enabled
 Mar  1 12:20:59 tantalus kernel: eth15: no IPv6 routers present
 
 As before, setting up the interface with ifconfig works.
 After sending out 68 pings the machine crashed with the usual 
 Hardware FATAL RESET.
 
 What can be done to debug this further ?

Is this fixed in later kernels, e.g. the 2.6.38 from Debian unstable?

If so and the fix can be isolated we can fix it in 2.6.32 for Squeeze.

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401194206.GA12436@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#518643: Same problem found in 2.6.26-2-amd64

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
tags 518643 moreinfo
thanks

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:13:53AM +0200, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
 Hi,
 
 We experienced a similar lockup tonight.

Sorry for the late reply.

The KVM version from Lenny is very old. Did you upgrade to something
more recent since then, e.g. to Debian 6.0 (Squeeze)?

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401194433.GA12792@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#617364: linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances

2011-04-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:30:32PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Severity: important
 Tags: patch
 
 Due to a NFS attribute revalidation problem it might happen that
 lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END) returns a stale file size.
 
 Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672981 and
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg02611.php for
 details. It would be appreciated if the bug could be fixed in the next
 point-releases for Lenny and Squeeze.
 
 Thanks and cheers,

The ideal way to get this fixed in Squeeze is to get the patches
merged into the 2.6.32 long term kernel, on which Squeeze is based.

Could you check back with Joe Conway and ask for commits IDs of the
upstream fixes?

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401195427.GA13123@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#502452: marked as done (kernel: UDF written file corrupted by zeros)

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:57:13 +0200
with message-id 20110401195713.GA13374@pisco.westfalen.local
and subject line Re: Bug#502452: Info received (kernel: UDF written file 
corrupted by  zeros)
has caused the Debian Bug report #502452,
regarding kernel: UDF written file corrupted by zeros
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
502452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502452
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64
Severity: important


Due to existing bugs I had with UDF in kernel 2.6.18, I use 2.6.24 for 8
days.
With 2.6.18 some file were not copied/created, when my log file was mainly
right.
With 2.6.24 my log file is corrupt.

Some monthes ago, I made one script which copy files to the 33 Gbytes IOMEGA 
/dev/hda
drive I formatted just before, with udf filesystem, in the same time it
writes the text log file.

Everithing looks nice, but begin of log file contains null bytes till
around offset 0x06e3, when begin of this text file is missing.

The log file is obtained by redirecting stdout.

Disk was formated with:

dd if=/dev/zero of=$DEV bs=512 count=64
/usr/bin/mkudffs --lvid=$LABEL --vid=$LABEL  --vsid=$LABEL
--fsid=$label --media-type=hd  $DEV  
mount -i -t udf $DEV $MNT 
(
echo -e Role:Archivage hebdomadaire\nnum:Cartouche $label 
/mnt/iomega/identifiant.txt
umount $DEV
)


Log file is created with the following command:
sauvegarde $DEST/log/log.log

Function sauvegarde begins with:

presente_date ()
{
  echo -n   
  date
}


indente ()
{
  sed -u 's/^/  /g'
}

sauvegarde ()
{
echo -n  A la date du   ; date # FIXME pour process de verification de
date
echo
echo Sauvegarde de $SOURCE vers $DEST
presente_date
cd $SOURCE
echo i varie dans  *
for i in *
do
if [ -d $i ]
then
(
if pushd $i
then
echo j varie dans  * 
for j in *
do
if [ ! -f  $toto ]
then
echo  bof
continue
fi

echo
echo ** Traitement de  $i/$j
presente_date
if [ $OPTION_CHERCHE_ANTIVIRUS -eq 1 ]
then

echo  Recherche d'antivirus dans $i/$j
clamscan -ri --detect-broken --block-encrypted
--block-max --max-files=2000 --max-space=100M $j
presente_date
else
echo  Desactivation de la recherche antivirus,
pour les performances
fi

echo Archivage de  $i/$j
destname=$DEST/data/${i}_$j

(
echo $destname
if [ -f $j ] # guillemets  pour les noms de fichiers
à espace
then
cp $j  $DEST/data/${i}_$j
#cp $j  $destname
else
echo   tar czf $DEST/data/${i}_$j.tgz $j
echo   tar czf $destname.tgz $j
#tar czf $destname.tgz $j  ||
tar cz  --ignore-failed-read -f
$DEST/data/${i}_$j.tgz $j ||
(
echo ECHEC ARCHIVAGE TAR non splité 





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 06:27:04PM +0200, jeanmichel@free.fr wrote:
 Selon Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org:
 
 
  Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
  this Bug report.
 
 
 In fact, UDF for those 33 Gbytes cartridge seams to work fine with linux 
 debian
 both 32 bits and 64 bits, both kernel 2.6.18 (for reading) and 2.6.24, both 
 IDE
 and USB.
 
 However, cartridge written with linux is not fully readable under windows XP:
 
 Cartridge is recognized as plug and play when connecting USB.
 Three directory in root are displayed in explorer.
 According to windows explorer,
 lost+found directory is empty (ok).
 log directory contain a single file witch is readable (ok).
 data directory containing about 20 or 40 files including some files up to 3-4
 Gyga bytes is marked as broken, so those 20-40 files are not displayed by
 explorer.

Closing the bug. Compability with Windows is beyond the scope of this bug.

Cheers,
Moritz

---End 

Bug#515956: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 2.6.26-1-alpha-generic fails to boot on DS10 (Tsunami))

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:40:20 +0200
with message-id 20110401194020.GA12221@pisco.westfalen.local
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 2.6.26-1-alpha-generic 
fails to boot on DS10 (Tsunami)
has caused the Debian Bug report #515956,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 2.6.26-1-alpha-generic fails to 
boot on DS10 (Tsunami)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
515956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: normal

Hi,

Right after the release of Lenny, I upgraded my Compaq AlphaServer DS1Â0 which 
was previous running Etch.

Everything went rather smoothly, until I tried to reboot the system: the new 
kernel fails to load.

aboot stops at loading compressed vmlinuz, and then nothing happens. The 
previous Etch kernel (2.6.18) still boots just fine.

I'm not quite sure how to debug this, is there any specific info to provide?

HTH

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: alpha

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-alpha-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.92o  tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.4-1  tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic suggests:
ii  aboot  1.0~pre20040408-3 Linux bootloader for the SRM conso
pn  fdutilsnone(no description available)
pn  linux-doc-2.6.26   none(no description available)

-- debconf information:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 false
  linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/initrd-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 false
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/abort-install-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 
true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 
true
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
 true
  linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:
  
linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic:


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
 Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic
 Version: 2.6.26-13
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi,
 
 Right after the release of Lenny, I upgraded my Compaq AlphaServer DS1Â0 
 which was previous running Etch.
 
 Everything went rather smoothly, until I tried to reboot the system: the new 
 kernel fails to load.
 
 aboot stops at loading compressed vmlinuz, and then nothing happens. The 
 previous Etch kernel (2.6.18) still boots just fine.
 
 I'm not quite sure how to debug this, is there any specific info to provide?

Alpha will be removed from the archive, closing this bug.


Bug#516015: marked as done (lenny kernel does not boot Alpha architecture)

2011-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:40:20 +0200
with message-id 20110401194020.GA12221@pisco.westfalen.local
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 2.6.26-1-alpha-generic 
fails to boot on DS10 (Tsunami)
has caused the Debian Bug report #515956,
regarding lenny kernel does not boot Alpha architecture
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
515956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic
Version: 2.6.26-13
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: lenny kernel not booting alpha

The linux-image that ships with Lenny will not boot on my Alpha architecture.  
The kernel tries to boot, but I'm immediately dumped back into the SRM console. 
 I'm able to boot with 2.6.18-6 from Etch.  Please let me know what more 
debugging info I can provide.

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
cpu			: Alpha

cpu model   : PCA56
cpu variation   : 7
cpu revision: 0
cpu serial number	: 
system type		: EB164

system variation: SX164
system revision : 0
system serial number	: 
cycle frequency [Hz]	: 5 
timer frequency [Hz]	: 1024.00

page size [bytes]   : 8192
phys. address bits  : 40
max. addr. space #  : 127
BogoMIPS: 1055.68
kernel unaligned acc: 0 (pc=0,va=0)
user unaligned acc  : 16564 (pc=21d8d4c,va=22020e1)
platform string : Digital AlphaPC 164SX 533 MHz
cpus detected   : 1
L1 Icache   : 16K, 1-way, 64b line
L1 Dcache   : 8K, 1-way, 32b line
L2 cache: 1024K, 1-way, 64b line
L3 cache: n/a


--
Jiann-Ming Su
Black Reagan will be blamed for the failing economic and monetary
policies instituted by white men over past 100 years.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
 Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic
 Version: 2.6.26-13
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi,
 
 Right after the release of Lenny, I upgraded my Compaq AlphaServer DS1Â0 
 which was previous running Etch.
 
 Everything went rather smoothly, until I tried to reboot the system: the new 
 kernel fails to load.
 
 aboot stops at loading compressed vmlinuz, and then nothing happens. The 
 previous Etch kernel (2.6.18) still boots just fine.
 
 I'm not quite sure how to debug this, is there any specific info to provide?

Alpha will be removed from the archive, closing this bug.

Cheers,
Moritz

---End Message---


Bug#620421: nfs-kernel-server: init script depends on non-existent ‘/dev/tcp/’

2011-04-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Apr  2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:

 The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on a
 non-existent directory:
 
It's not supposed to be a directory, it's a bash feature for
redirections to tcp sockets.

Cheers,
Julien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401210534.gl3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#600656: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Crash after nullpointer dereference during gparted reading a disk

2011-04-01 Thread Andreas Feldner
Hi Moritz,

I did run memtest for a day or so, without any findings. I did not repeat the 
test yet, as it appears a bit dangerous to me. After Ben's remark, I was 
wondering if perhaps the respective disk, or the IDE controller it is connected 
to, might have a hardware problem. This would not necessarily show up in 
everyday operation, as the operational system disk is connected via SATA. 
Certainly I will try with a later kernel version in a quiet minute!

Cheers,
Andreas.

Am 01.04.2011 um 21:35 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:

 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:20:00AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:41 +0200, Andreas Feldner wrote:
 Hi Ben,
 
 somehow netconsole doesn't do anything for me. But it turned out the the 
 system behaviour is not exactly reproducible and anyway I can see the 
 messages 
 on screen if X is not started (because nvidia module banned ;-) ).
 
 So, here I have the following error message, hope that helps!
 [...]
 
 OK, this looks really weird.  I looked for reports of similar crashes
 and found http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/11/302 which apparently turned
 out to be due to a hardware fault.
 
 Could you test Linux 2.6.36 as packaged in experimental?  If that has
 the same problem, try running memtest86+ for a while to check whether
 this is due to bad RAM.  I suspect it isn't, but we have to check.
 
 Andreas, did you test later kernels (now also in unstable) and memtest?
 
 Cheers,
Moritz





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/5bf8e55c-1567-473a-9b05-2cd210ed9...@flying-snail.de



Bug#620421: nfs-kernel-server: init script depends on non-existent ‘/dev/tcp/’

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Finney
On 01-Apr-2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sat, Apr  2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
 
  The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on
  a non-existent directory:
 
 It's not supposed to be a directory, it's a bash feature for
 redirections to tcp sockets.

Okay. It's not working on this machine; the ‘rpcinfo -t localhost
portmapper’ test does work.

-- 
 \   “If you don't know what your program is supposed to do, you'd |
  `\ better not start writing it.” —Edsger W. Dijkstra |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#620421: nfs-kernel-server: init script depends on non-existent ‘/dev/tcp/’

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:42:09AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
 On 01-Apr-2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Sat, Apr  2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
  
   The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on
   a non-existent directory:
  
  It's not supposed to be a directory, it's a bash feature for
  redirections to tcp sockets.
 
 Okay. It's not working on this machine; the ‘rpcinfo -t localhost
 portmapper’ test does work.

Which version of bash is installed?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110402003433.ge2...@decadent.org.uk



Bug#620421: nfs-kernel-server: init script depends on non-existent ‘/dev/tcp/’

2011-04-01 Thread Ben Finney
On 02-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 Which version of bash is installed?

$ aptitude show bash | grep '^Version:'
Version: 4.1-3
$ /bin/bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)

-- 
 \“There are no significant bugs in our released software that |
  `\ any significant number of users want fixed.” —Bill Gates, |
_o__)   1995-10-23 |
Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature