Bug#605787: Should be fixed by now
Hi Ola, it works Thx for your work! Am 20.06.2011 07:26, schrieb Ola Lundqvist: Hi Ulrich Would it be possible for you to verify that the issue you reported in 605787 was fixed in 2.6.32-31 (latest stable release). There are checkpointing fixes in that release namely that should solve this as well. Thanks in advance, // Ola -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfeeafe.9050...@1und1.de
Processed: Re: Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 631080 linux-2.6 Bug #631080 [general] general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'linux-2.6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13085590689174.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices
reassign 631080 linux-2.6 thanks On Montag, 20. Juni 2011, David Jorge wrote: Package: general Severity: normal Tags: d-i On a new installation of Squezee, i dont have a sound. This is my sound device: lspci | grep -i audio 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device a002 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21 Memory at fe024000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel With gstreamer-properties, i cant get any sound too. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_MX.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_MX.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201106201037.44279.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#631080: No sound
Hi, I seems hit by the same bug. But only under desktop. I mean when I try alsamixer under console I see all the channel but no sound and no channel under my desktop. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktik4fs5k5yt43wdy8zpo8w1f-ba...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#604469: Update check
On 20/06/11 06:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote: I would like you to check if the issue you reported in 604469 is solved in the squeeze release. Well, I can't say for certain, but I couldn't reproduce the issue using the squeeze kernel. Tim. -- South East Open Source Solutions Limited Registered in England and Wales with company number 06134732. Registered Office: 2 Powell Gardens, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 1TQ VAT number: 900 6633 53 http://seoss.co.uk/ +44-(0)1273-808309 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dff1823.4080...@seoss.co.uk
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi ola, my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero. see http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary and in contrary http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1 They *don't* update their git tree. come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41 So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different. cheers -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620102301.ga14...@vostochny.stro.at
Bug#628184: linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: ath5k module is unstable after upgrade
On Jun 20 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: This was a correction to the description - PAE is not supported on most Pentium M and Celeron M processors (although it may work at least partly). If the 'flags' line in /proc/cpuinfo does not include 'pae' then you should use the 486 version. Thanks for the explanation. Following it I noticed that my processor supports pae, albeit it is a Celeron M (cpu family 6, model 14, stepping 8). Getting back to the reported bug, I'll try linux-image-3.0 as soon as it gets into stable. Thanks again. Best regards, Alexandre -- === Alexandre Lymberopoulos - lym...@gmail.com === -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620111724.ga17...@ime.usp.br
Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices
On a new installation of Squezee, i dont have a sound. Strange was it working before, you mean to say this is an fresh install, not a upgrade. Was working on Linux before, a different distro. This is my sound device: lspci | grep -i audio 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device a002 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21 Are you missing something here? Memory at fe024000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Seems to be correct. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=xch85t74qodklozk23mvjspq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks and Kir Maks: See below. Kir: Can you see if the openvz team can help out with what is described below. Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: Hi ola, my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero. see http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary and in contrary http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1 They *don't* update their git tree. come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41 So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different. Ok. // Ola cheers -- maks -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620134659.98893lekglnbe...@webmail.inguza.net
Bug#631080: No sound
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 11:29 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Hi, I seems hit by the same bug. But only under desktop. I mean when I try alsamixer under console I see all the channel but no sound and no channel under my desktop. So report a bug on whatever program you used on the 'desktop'. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: closing 605787
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Submitter reported as fixed in stable close 605787 2.6.32-34squeeze1 Bug#605787: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: openvz checkpointing end resuming doenst work due to problems with file access right 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.32-34squeeze1, send any further explanations to Ulrich Goettlich ulrich.goettl...@1und1.de thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605787: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605787 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130857400019341.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#604469: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64: openvz - deadlock during RAID rebuild with container backing store on LVM+snapshot)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:47:31 +0100 with message-id 1308574051.3093.3.camel@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#604469: Update check has caused the Debian Bug report #604469, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64: openvz - deadlock during RAID rebuild with container backing store on LVM+snapshot to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604469: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604469 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-25lenny1 Severity: normal On Lenny, I have observed the following behaviour: An I/O deadlock occurs under the following conditions: . OpenVZ container data stored on an LVM for which the PV is an md RAID1 . RAID1 md undergoing a rebuild or check . An LVM snapshot is active for the logical volume (in order to take a backup) . I/O occurs within the container The RAID resync then stops, as does all other I/O to the filesystem which is mounted upon the LVM. Adding various debug to the md raid1 driver shows that when the system gets to this state, there are a number of bio requests which are still pending (or at least their callback never gets executed). http://marc.info/?t=12847354111r=1w=2 Adding the debug printks and atomic counters appears to make the deadlock occur more readily (within seconds rather than minutes of starting the openvz container). My guess was that this is some sort of a priority inversion deadlock, I/O in the container is triggering I/O outside of the container (via LVM snapshot) which must complete first (because of the OpenVZ scheduling rules or otherwise), and possibly the md barrier code is enforcing the opposite ordering. .. but when I tried: echo 0 /sys/block/sda/queue/iosched/virt_mode echo 0 /sys/block/sdb/queue/iosched/virt_mode prior to starting the container, didn't seem to change things. So maybe that's not the problem. Simply using the container private directory as a chroot, and placing reasonably heavy I/O load does not seem to cause the same deadlock to occur. I haven't seen the deadlock occur on 2.6.32, but haven't tried to insert the same debugging statements. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.98.5 tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii vzctl 3.0.24-10 server virtualization solution - c linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 recommends no packages. Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 suggests: pn grub | lilo none (no description available) pn linux-doc-2.6.26 none (no description available) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.6.32-34squeeze1 On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:51 +0100, Tim Small wrote: On 20/06/11 06:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote: I would like you to check if the issue you reported in 604469 is solved in the squeeze release. Well, I can't say for certain, but I couldn't reproduce the issue using the squeeze kernel. Closing, then. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 17:31 +0530, Sujit Karatparambil wrote: On a new installation of Squezee, i dont have a sound. Strange was it working before, you mean to say this is an fresh install, not a upgrade. Was working on Linux before, a different distro. This is my sound device: lspci | grep -i audio 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device a002 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21 Are you missing something here? Memory at fe024000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Seems to be correct. Please send the text of /proc/asound/cards Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 631080
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 631080 + moreinfo Bug #631080 [linux-2.6] general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130857425620014.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +, maximilian attems wrote: Hi ola, my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero. see http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary and in contrary http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1 wrong cp, meant of course, see how happily that tree is maintained regularly: http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1 They *don't* update their git tree. come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41 So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620124057.gb14...@vostochny.stro.at
Bug#605787: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: openvz checkpointing end resuming doenst work due to problems with file access right)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:08:46 +0200 with message-id 20110620150846.148029yqzh8qf...@webmail.inguza.net and subject line Re: Should be fixed by now has caused the Debian Bug report #605787, regarding linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: openvz checkpointing end resuming doenst work due to problems with file access right to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 605787: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605787 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 Severity: normal Full Bug report and patches to fix the Bug can be found at: http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1603 Because this is a backport kernel the bug should also occur on squeeze systems. Regards, Ulrich Goettlich -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux 0.92o tools for generating an initramfs ii linux-base 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 Linux image base package ii module-init-tools 3.4-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii vzctl 3.0.22-14 server virtualization solution - c Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 recommends: ii firmware-linux-free2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 Binary firmware for various driver Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 suggests: ii grub 0.97-47lenny2 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v ii lilo 1:22.8-7 LInux LOader - The Classic OS load ii linux-doc-2.6.32 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 Linux kernel specific documentatio Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 is related to: ii firmware-bnx2 0.24~bpo50+1 Binary firmware for Broadcom NetXt pn firmware-bnx2x none (no description available) pn firmware-ipw2x00none (no description available) pn firmware-ivtv none (no description available) pn firmware-iwlwifinone (no description available) pn firmware-linux none (no description available) pn firmware-linux-nonfree none (no description available) pn firmware-qlogic none (no description available) pn firmware-ralink none (no description available) pn xen-hypervisor none (no description available) -- debconf information excluded ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.6.32-31 Ok, thanks. Closing the bugreport then. // Ola Quoting Ulrich Goettlich ulrich.goettl...@1und1.de: Hi Ola, it works Thx for your work! Am 20.06.2011 07:26, schrieb Ola Lundqvist: Hi Ulrich Would it be possible for you to verify that the issue you reported in 605787 was fixed in 2.6.32-31 (latest stable release). There are checkpointing fixes in that release namely that should solve this as well. Thanks in advance, // Ola -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- ---End Message---
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. // Ola Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +, maximilian attems wrote: Hi ola, my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero. see http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary and in contrary http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1 wrong cp, meant of course, see how happily that tree is maintained regularly: http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1 They *don't* update their git tree. come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41 So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different. -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u...@webmail.inguza.net
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 15:00 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. [...] It is very easy: you look at the changelog. If you don't want to get the whole package then see: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/kernel/dists/squeeze/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?revision=HEADview=markup Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. // Ola that is totally uncorrect. we have pretty much allways synced with available openvz git. (see 2.6.26 history and 2.6.32 history) uploads are not immediate as we have a different schedule. also please next time do at least the *effort* of asking the openvz guys instead of just forwarding my rants on stupid questions. a little effort from your side would really be appreciated. thanks -- maks PS. also you didn't cc the debian openvz mailinglist nor pavel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620132429.gc14...@vostochny.stro.at
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Ben Sorry. My mistake. I looked only at the stable release, not the stable-security release. If I look into the correct one, yes then it is quite obvious. However I have one additional question as I do not know the process you work with in the kernel team fully. When you update to a newer version of the kernel package, how do you handle openvz in that case? I assume you use the same kernel patch as before, but how do that differ from this case. Or do you mean that the one I referred to was to some other track than the openvz track? In that case, I'm sorry, I did not understand that. Best regards, / /Ola Quoting Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 15:00 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. [...] It is very easy: you look at the changelog. If you don't want to get the whole package then see: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/kernel/dists/squeeze/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?revision=HEADview=markup Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620164221.18295ici1o1tz...@webmail.inguza.net
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. // Ola that is totally uncorrect. Well. See below. we have pretty much allways synced with available openvz git. (see 2.6.26 history and 2.6.32 history) uploads are not immediate as we have a different schedule. I understand that this is the case before the release. However after the release only security updates are there, unless there is a point release to be planned. That is at least the case for all other packages in Debian. also please next time do at least the *effort* of asking the openvz guys instead of just forwarding my rants on stupid questions. a little effort from your side would really be appreciated. I do not understand this comment actually. I thought you wanted better support from openvz project. This is what you wrote in the email to me. Kir is the project manager for that project and the one I'm in contact with normally. This is why I asked him to help with what you complained about. And about stupid question: All I did was to ask a question to you, and what I got back was a angry email stating that openvz project behaves badly, and now I get another angry email stating that I have not put in any effort. I'm sorry if that is the impression you get. Sorry about that, but I do really not understand what you are so upset about. If it is so that you do not have time to look into this yourself, I have no problem if you simply write that. Just let me know that (without all the angry tone) and I'll try to help as much as I can. thanks -- maks PS. also you didn't cc the debian openvz mailinglist nor pavel. Yes I know, because Kir is the project manager. I asked Kir a question. If I would not had got a response I would have followed that up on the mailinglist as well. But as you pointed that out I'm cc:ing it now. Best regards, // Ola -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620165256.14971zl5kb0n6...@webmail.inguza.net
Bug#595187: marked as done (linux-2.6: lots of OOPses on resume (NULL pointer dereference in file_ra_state_init))
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:47:24 +0200 with message-id banlktimjhycym1b-m4oattxywsb0tg8...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Not in experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #595187, regarding linux-2.6: lots of OOPses on resume (NULL pointer dereference in file_ra_state_init) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 595187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595187 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: normal Hi, Since the upgrade from 2.6.32-20 - 2.6.32-21, my laptop fails to resume properly into Xorg : the cursor only appears when I move it and there is nothing much more I can do than switching to the console, login as root and reboot. In the console, I can see a lot of OOpses that are visible in the attached log file. This did not happend with 2.6.32-20, or at least not before many suspend cycles. Here is the first of the many similar stack traces : -- Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410659] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0020 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410665] IP: [810ba09c] file_ra_state_init+0x4/0x14 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410673] PGD 7c87e067 PUD 7c370067 PMD 0 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410678] Oops: [#1] SMP Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410681] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0003:00/power_supply/AC/uevent Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410685] CPU 1 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410687] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc acpi_cpufreq firewire_sbp2 firewire_core crc_itu_t loop sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt arc4 snd_hda_codec_idt ecb iwl3945 snd_hda_intel iwlcore snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep joydev mac80211 snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device led_class battery dell_laptop snd cfg80211 soundcore psmouse snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 evdev pcspkr rfkill dcdbas wmi serio_raw ac processor ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod sd_mod crc_t10dif i915 drm_kms_helper drm ata_generic uhci_hcd i2c_algo_bit tg3 libphy thermal ata_piix button libata ehci_hcd scsi_mod i2c_core video thermal_sys output usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410739] Pid: 2798, comm: date Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 Latitude D630 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410742] RIP: 0010:[810ba09c] [810ba09c] file_ra_state_init+0x4/0x14 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410747] RSP: 0018:88007df39db0 EFLAGS: 00010206 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410749] RAX: RBX: RCX: 88007c89ba80 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410752] RDX: 88007c89ba80 RSI: 88007ef53798 RDI: 88007c89baf0 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410754] RBP: 88007c89ba80 R08: R09: 880037bd9c00 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410757] R10: 88007df39e48 R11: 81151385 R12: Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410759] R13: 88007ef53678 R14: 0024 R15: 810eb47c Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410762] FS: () GS:88000190() knlGS: Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410765] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410768] CR2: 0020 CR3: 7c70e000 CR4: 06e0 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410770] DR0: DR1: DR2: Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410773] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410776] Process date (pid: 2798, threadinfo 88007df38000, task 88007db662e0) Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410778] Stack: Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410779] 810eb991 880037bd9c00 880037a1aa00 88007a759600 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410783] 0 88007df39e48 88007df39e48 8001 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410787] 0 0024 ff9c 810f70bb 88007df39e78 Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410792] Call Trace: Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410797] [810eb991] ? __dentry_open+0x1c4/0x2bf Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410802] [810f70bb] ? do_filp_open+0x4e4/0x94b Sep 1 21:29:47 annalee kernel: [ 1062.410806] [810e40dd] ?
[bts-link] source package linux-2.6
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #627575 (http://bugs.debian.org/627575) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37514 # * remote status changed: NEW - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED usertags 627575 - status-NEW usertags 627575 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620163923.19502.26819.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
Bug#515201: linux-image: sata drive connected via marvell controller crashes
forwarded 515201 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 quit egr...@bol.com.br wrote: I put a message on bugzilla.kernel.org, on bug report 12075. I found two reports on Marvell sata controllers, and chose the most recent one, in spite of the fact that it deals with 6145 controller, while mine is a 6121. But, as I understand, the issue is the same. Thanks, Eduardo. Marking accordingly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620202900.GA32275@elie
Processed: Re: linux-image: sata drive connected via marvell controller crashes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 515201 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 Bug #515201 [linux-2.6] linux-image: sata drive connected via marvell controller crashes Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12075'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 515201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130860175631975.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices
Forwarded Message From: David Jorge Hernandez Ibarra david...@gmail.com To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: Bug#631080: general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:17:33 -0500 In my last installation of debian (Squezee unstable), i dont have problems with the sound But in my new installation of squeze, (A clean one) i dont have sound, in both versions (32 and 64 bits), with gnome. I test the sound in Fedora 15 and Ubuntu 11.04 and works. /proc/asound/cards 0 [NVidia ]: HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia HDA NVidia at 0xfe024000 irq 21 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1308622826.3093.13.camel@localhost
Processed: reassign 631080 to gnome
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Sorry this isn't very specific but I don't know what to ask next reassign 631080 gnome Bug #631080 [linux-2.6] general: No sound in Squezee, control volume dont found devices Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'gnome'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130862291918815.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [Debian] Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 18:58 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: [...] As you can see my questions were rather polite. I asked if you thought it would be possible to include it or not. I even asked if you wanted me to file a Debian specific bug report about this. Maybe that is the part you mis-interpreted. It was not my intention to be rude. It was a polite question actually. Yes, and I think Maks has been very rude to you without justification. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:52 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Maks and Kir Kir: Some updated statement from Maks. Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates. // Ola that is totally uncorrect. Well. See below. we have pretty much allways synced with available openvz git. (see 2.6.26 history and 2.6.32 history) uploads are not immediate as we have a different schedule. I understand that this is the case before the release. However after the release only security updates are there, unless there is a point release to be planned. That is at least the case for all other packages in Debian. [...] Not quite. People using a Debian stable release should have the following package sources: - stable (updated at point releases) - stable-security (updated at any time for security fixes) - stable-updates (updated at any time for other important fixes; this is new for Debian 6.0 and replaces the volatile suite) All upgrades in stable and stable-updates initially go into: - stable-proposed-updates from which some users and developers may install and test them. We (the kernel team) generally merge updates in the 2.6.32.y series into our stable branch quickly, and may upload to stable-proposed-updates multiple times between point releases. We can request that important fixes are released through stable-updates, though we haven't yet done so. While we continue to maintain packaging using svn (this will change RSN :-), the source changes are also converted into the 'squeeze' branch of git://anonscm.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git. Beware that this branch is generated from a patch series and is effectively rebased. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 627575
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 627575 + pending Bug #627575 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-amd64: hangs loading eeprom after reporting GMBUS timed out [i915] Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13086305943990.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Ben First many thanks for your help. Much appriciated. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:16:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: ... I understand that this is the case before the release. However after the release only security updates are there, unless there is a point release to be planned. That is at least the case for all other packages in Debian. [...] Not quite. People using a Debian stable release should have the following package sources: - stable (updated at point releases) - stable-security (updated at any time for security fixes) - stable-updates (updated at any time for other important fixes; this is new for Debian 6.0 and replaces the volatile suite) Thanks for the reminder about stable-updates, and also change of mind. I got the impression that stable-updates was merely a volatile renamed, but I see now that it can be used for other purposes as well as you describe below. All upgrades in stable and stable-updates initially go into: - stable-proposed-updates from which some users and developers may install and test them. Yes that is a point. I'm too focused on release, while this is a community where pre-release versions may as well be important. We (the kernel team) generally merge updates in the 2.6.32.y series into our stable branch quickly, and may upload to stable-proposed-updates multiple times between point releases. We can request that important fixes are released through stable-updates, though we haven't yet done so. This is good to know. While we continue to maintain packaging using svn (this will change RSN :-), the source changes are also converted into the 'squeeze' branch of git://anonscm.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git. Beware that this branch is generated from a patch series and is effectively rebased. Thanks for letting me know. Best regards, // Ola Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110621052947.ga7...@inguza.net
