Bug#685360: Logitech USB keyboard broken with Linux 3.2 (regression from 3.1)
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote: Hello Josip, I am back at the office. Please let me know if applying the patch solved your problem. Yes, please let me know. I'd like to have confirmation so that we could have it for 3.6 still (otherwise we'll go with -stable of course). I'll of course need the patch from [1] with proper commit message and sign off. Adding Benjamin to CC. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174/comments/55 -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1209191533290.31...@pobox.suse.cz
Bug#688131: [l10n:cs] Initial Czech translation of PO debconf template for firmware-nonfree 0.37
Package: firmware-nonfree Version: 0.37 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch In attachment there is initial Czech translation of PO debconf template (cs.po) for package firmware-nonfree, please include it. cs.po Description: Binary data
Bug#688132: firmware-nonfree: Romanian translation of the debconf template
Source: firmware-nonfree Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Dear Maintainer, See attached the Romanian translation of the debconf template. Kind regards, Andrei -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-rt-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash # Romanian translation of firmware-nonfree. # Copyright (C) 2012 # This file is distributed under the same license as the firmware-nonfree package. # Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com, 2012. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: firmware-nonfree\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: firmware-nonf...@packages.debian.org\n POT-Creation-Date: 2012-09-03 12:15+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2012-09-19 19:56+0300\n Last-Translator: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com\n Language-Team: Romanian Team debian-l10n-roman...@lists.debian.org\n Language: ro\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates/templates.license.in:2001 msgid Do you agree to the \@license-title@\? msgstr Sunteți de acord cu „@license-title@”? #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates/templates.license.in:2001 msgid In order to install this package, you must agree to the following terms, the \@license-title@\. If you do not agree, the installation will be canceled. msgstr Pentru a instala acest pachet trebuie să acceptați termenii licenței „@license-title@”. Dacă nu sunteți de acord instalarea va fi anulată. #. Type: error #. Description #: ../templates/templates.license.in:3001 msgid Declined @license-title@ msgstr @license-title@ refuzată #. Type: error #. Description #: ../templates/templates.license.in:3001 msgid If you do not agree to the \@license-title@\ license terms you cannot install this software. msgstr Dacă nu acceptați termenii licenței „@license-title@” nu puteți instala acest software. #. Type: error #. Description #: ../templates/templates.license.in:3001 msgid The installation of this package has been canceled. msgstr Instalarea acestui pachet a fost anulată.
Bug#685360: Logitech USB keyboard broken with Linux 3.2 (regression from 3.1)
Hello Jiri, I am pretty busy but I think I will be able to send you the official patch tomorrow. Thanks, Nestor. On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote: Hello Josip, I am back at the office. Please let me know if applying the patch solved your problem. Yes, please let me know. I'd like to have confirmation so that we could have it for 3.6 still (otherwise we'll go with -stable of course). I'll of course need the patch from [1] with proper commit message and sign off. Adding Benjamin to CC. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174/comments/55 -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
Re: [PATCH] asus-wmi: use ASUS_WMI_METHODID_DSTS2 as default DSTS ID.
Just FYI. (I'm not filing a bug because I'm not sure if anyone's experienced this with Debian kernels.) Sincerely, Jonathan ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carsten Otto o...@informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Dear all, the patch seems to be integrated in 3.5.4 (current stable kernel). When rebasing using git I see that the patch is not applied on top, most likely because it was already included somewhere in the official stable Linux itself. Easy workaround is to blacklist/remove asus-wmi (and/or eeepc-wmi/asus-nb-wmi). I think ubuntu guys are working on it, and since they seems to be working with Asus (and I'm not), it will be easier for them. As mentioned in the following Ubuntu bug report, this patch causes problems (which I also observe). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1041883 It takes me about 10 tries to successfully boot my system. In the unsuccessful tries the screen is blanked shortly during the boot process and nothing happens (the magic keys don't work, network access cannot be tested that early). Bye, -- Carsten Otto o...@informatik.rwth-aachen.de LuFG Informatik 2 http://verify.rwth-aachen.de/otto/ RWTH Aachenphone: +49 241 80-21211 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBYSzUACgkQjUF4jpCSQBQpbgCfSUUvaZbs1krkcRKa8iTcyKxA 7AQAn1NfXugZ5553+Z9LOB46lJqFcXt8 =avwS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net ---End Message---
Bug#682726: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Bug#682726: fixed in linux 3.2.29-1)
reopen 682726 thanks On 2012-09-19 01:48, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 20:10 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: On 2012-09-18 14:30, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the linux-source-3.4 package: #682726: [linux-source-3.4] make xconfig: Unable to find the QT4 tool qmake. It has been closed by Ben Hutchingsb...@decadent.org.uk. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Ben Hutchingsb...@decadent.org.uk by replying to this email. I understand that suggesting pkg-config might reduce the prevalence of this bug, but how would that solve it? There is no solution to the problem of 'optional dependencies'; this is the best you're going to get. Ben. If by 'optional dependencies' you mean assuming a feature provided by a package on which the dependency is not declared as absolute, there are certainly solutions; declare the dependency as absolute or stop assuming the feature's presence. Note that the absence of a solution for a bug, even if it would be real, would not solve the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505a988e.30...@gmail.com
Processed: tagging 682726
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 682726 + wontfix
Bug #682726 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-source-3.4]
[linux-source-3.4] make xconfig: Unable to find the QT4 tool qmake.
Added tag(s) wontfix.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
682726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134811535223913.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#682726: [linux-source-3.4] make xconfig: Unable to find the QT4 tool qmake.
Hi, Filipus Klutiero wrote: If by 'optional dependencies' you mean assuming a feature provided by a package on which the dependency is not declared as absolute, there are certainly solutions; declare the dependency as absolute or stop assuming the feature's presence. Neither of those would be appropriate in this case. However, if you'd like to improve the error message, that would probably be a welcome change upstream. Upstream would be the place to propose such a change (with a patch); it does not seem worth tracking in Debian. Thanks for your help, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120920043655.GA2924@elie.Belkin
Bug#688131: [l10n:cs] Initial Czech translation of PO debconf template for firmware-nonfree 0.37
Quoting Michal Šimůnek (michal.simu...@gmail.com): Package: firmware-nonfree Version: 0.37 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch In attachment there is initial Czech translation of PO debconf template (cs.po) for package firmware-nonfree, please include it. Unfuzzied file cs.po Description: application/gettext signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688132: firmware-nonfree: Romanian translation of the debconf template
Quoting Andrei POPESCU (andreimpope...@gmail.com): Source: firmware-nonfree Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Dear Maintainer, See attached the Romanian translation of the debconf template. Unfuzzied file. ro.po Description: application/gettext signature.asc Description: Digital signature
