Bug#733826: crazy loop "xhci_hcd Too many fragments"
Package: src:linux Version: 3.11.10-1 Severity: wishlist Whatever you do, please add some break out code. Do not just loop putting # grep -c xhci /var/log/syslog 1052792 lines of xhci_hcd :00:14.0: Too many fragments 79, max 63 swelling # ls -l /var/log/syslog -rw-r- 1 root adm 107977515 01-01 07:17 /var/log/syslog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8738l8y4rs@jidanni.org
Processed: tagging 733770, severity of 733770 is normal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 733770 + upstream Bug #733770 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: linux/btrfs.h: 'NULL' undeclared Added tag(s) upstream. > # workaround is trivial > severity 733770 normal Bug #733770 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: linux/btrfs.h: 'NULL' undeclared Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 733770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.138852020322533.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#733770: linux-libc-dev: linux/btrfs.h: 'NULL' undeclared
Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 3.11.10-1 Severity: important Control: affects -1 src:trinity Attempting to #include without first ensuring a definition of NULL (for instancy, by including ) fails: /usr/include/linux/btrfs.h: In function 'btrfs_err_str': /usr/include/linux/btrfs.h:511:11: error: 'NULL' undeclared (first use in this function) return NULL; ^ /usr/include/linux/btrfs.h:511:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in As a result, trinity FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=trinity&arch=amd64&ver=1.2-1&stamp=1388344679 Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131231184529.13071.69597.report...@ghostwheel.internal.ucko.debian.net
Processed: linux-libc-dev: linux/btrfs.h: 'NULL' undeclared
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:trinity Bug #733770 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: linux/btrfs.h: 'NULL' undeclared Added indication that 733770 affects src:trinity -- 733770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.138851553626162.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 729704 with 652459
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 729704 with 652459 Bug #729704 [audit] audit: Init script should depend on $remote_fs for awk 729704 was not blocked by any bugs. 729704 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 729704: 652459 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 729704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13884960351613.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#652459: Move awk implementations from /usr/bin to /bin
On 31 December 2013 08:11, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 31 décembre 2013 01:30 CET, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) : > >>> Any thoughts? >> The correct solution is completing #652459, which mounts /usr in the >> initramfs. > > It is quite unclear why this bug is stalled. I believe there were reservations about /etc portions of the patch series, which were asked to be "unbundled" and to be considered separately. I don't know if this was done, if not I guess I should come up with such patch on top of the proposed patch series, as one of the interested parties to get this resolved. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhluj1kpjmlat1dgqteojwvdfpeyxhbqmu7ybkyvahju8...@mail.gmail.com
