Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Hi Salvatore, Le 09/11/2022 à 17:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : There is our documentation at https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.2 . But would you be willing to test (but be aware, unsigned!) test packages fetched byhttps://people.debian.org ? I am not sure I am able to do that :) The first thing to do would be to perform the check you suggested yesterday. Am I wrong or do I have to rebuild a whole kernel from the source code? In this case would it be possible to install the source code elsewhere than on my (relatively small) SSD ? Excuse me for my maybe basic questions, I've never done this before, and thanks in advance for your help ! Best regards. -- Guy
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/ when a kernel package was built
On donderdag 10 november 2022 03:42:36 CET Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 03:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > $ ls -al 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build -> > > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 37 > > Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/source -> > > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-common > The date of the symlinks is November the 5th, however I built the > custom kernel this night. https://tracker.debian.org/news/1381949/accepted-linux-607-1-source-into-unstable/ Shows that 6.0.0-3 was accepted into Unstable on Nov 5 ... > So there must have been something else that created them (dkms? - at > least not me personally)... or is there some date mangling somewhere > for making reproducible builds? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux does say "Does not build reproducibly" But in the aforemention link you can also see this line: "Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:41:22 +0100" It _could_ be a coincidence, but I doubt it. So it looks like it's not fully reproducible (yet), but using that date is a step towards it. Getting (back) to the actual subject of the bug report, it seems quite likely that you also have linux-headers-X.Y.Z installed. And IIRC, it needs/creates those 'source' and 'build' dirs/links. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Hi Salvatore, Le 10/11/2022 à 09:41, Guy Durrieu a écrit : I am not sure I am able to do that :) Perhaps I didn't understand what you meant... Does the linux image 6.0.0.3 (6.0.7.2) include the patch correcting my issue ? And in this case, is it sufficient to download the linux image and the linux headers in order to test the result ? Thanks and my apologies ! Best regards. -- Guy
Bug#999485: firmware-brcm80211: Please add brcmfmac43456-sdio.* files for wifi support in Raspberry p400
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:52:00 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Please note I'm currenlty shipping the required files in > raspi-firmware -- I believe their right place is in > firmware-brcm80211, so please just ping me (or better, raise a bug on > raspi-firmware) whent they are added to this package. I opened https://bugs.debian.org/1023741 for it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1023240: firmware-iwlwifi: iwlwifi-so-a0-gf-a0-72.ucode possibly missing
It was added to linux-firmware.git after 2022-10-12, should be in 20221109: commit 06dbfbc74388a2e9a7228f4215b884a3139ece56 Author: Gregory Greenman Date: Wed Oct 26 12:15:12 2022 +0300 iwlwifi: add new FWs from core69-81 release Add the -69.ucode firmwares for the currently supported hardware. This is not the latest core, but we didn't send it before and it still can be useful. I'll check tomorrow whether it will cure the errors I'm getting with kernel 5.19.11-1~bpo11+1 on an AX211 with -71.ucode (regression from 5.18.16-1~bpo11+1 which works on the same hardware/firmware combo).
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Just a quick response to this question, but I'll leave it up to Salvatore for the rest of the bug handling/assistance :-) On donderdag 10 november 2022 11:35:33 CET Guy Durrieu wrote: > > I am not sure I am able to do that :) > > Perhaps I didn't understand what you meant... Does the linux image > 6.0.0.3 (6.0.7.2) include the patch correcting my issue ? And in this > case, is it sufficient to download the linux image and the linux headers > in order to test the result ? No. In order to test the patch, you do need to build a kernel. The instructions from 4.2.2 is the simplest (relatively) way to build a kernel with a patch applied. But AFAIK, before you do the instructions from 4.2.2, you need to do the 'Preparation' steps from 4.2.1 first. > Thanks and my apologies ! No need to apologize :-) If you've never build a kernel before, it looks 'scary'. The instructions from 4.2.2 are made to make it as simple as possible, but that doesn't mean it is simple (for everyone). Good luck! (Back to Salvatore now) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
On donderdag 10 november 2022 11:54:59 CET Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Perhaps I didn't understand what you meant... Does the linux image
> > 6.0.0.3 (6.0.7.2) include the patch correcting my issue ? And in this
> > case, is it sufficient to download the linux image and the linux headers
> > in order to test the result ?
>
> No. In order to test the patch, you do need to build a kernel.
Oh boy, I probably should've stayed out of it completely ...
In another response to this bug, Salvatore did provide an alternative means
and that is using the kernel package he build for you.
See this part:
On woensdag 9 november 2022 17:42:44 CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Additionnally, I am not sure to know how to proceed in order to apply the
> > patch you sent. Could you give me some hint ?
>
> There is our documentation at
> https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4
> .2.2 . But would you be willing to test (but be aware, unsigned!) test
> packages fetched by https://people.debian.org ?
>
> https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/linux/6.0.7-2/
>
> I have put a sha256sum file with signature on it with my gpg key to
> have an additional verification on those.
>
> https://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=04A4407CB9142C23030C17AE789D6
> F057FD863FE
So you have 2 options:
- build it yourself from source (with instructions from 4.2.2)
- Use the packages Salvatore build for you at the above location
Keep in mind that you normally shouldn't install programs ('deb' on Debian or
'exe' if on Windows) from "strangers on the internet". Salvatore did provide a
(gpg) signed file to provide some mitigation against the risks.
But you would still need to trust Salvatore.
If you build it yourself, then you don't download programs from "strangers on
the internet". But that obviously is more work. Which can be daunting if you
hadn't done that before.
HTH
(And now I'm really staying out of it ;-))
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/ when a kernel package was built
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 03:37:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > l 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source > lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build -> > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 37 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/source -> > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-common > I guess something during the build process creates these symlinks? Those symlinks are included in linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64, see https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64/filelist Did you remove that package as well? Bastian -- There's coffee in that nebula! -- Capt. Kathryn Janeway, Star Trek: Voyager, "The Cloud"
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/ when a kernel package was built
Hey Diederik and Bastian On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 13:07 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Those symlinks are included in linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64, see > https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64/filelist > > Did you remove that package as well? You are both right, I have linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64 and totally forgotten about that. But nevertheless, shouldn't that then contain those files and dpkg not print out an error then? And indeed: $ dpkg -L linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64 | grep '^/lib' /lib /lib/modules /lib/modules/6.0.0-3-amd64 /lib/modules/6.0.0-3-amd64/build /lib/modules/6.0.0-3-amd64/source So I'm a bit surprised why I saw some error at all in that case. Thanks, Chris.
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Hi Diederik,
Thanks for your useful answer, that is what I more or less understood
after thinking about it, but it's better to have a confirmation :)
And don't worry, my emails were a bit messy anyway !
Best regards.
-- Guy Durrieu.
Le 10/11/2022 à 12:15, Diederik de Haas a écrit :
On donderdag 10 november 2022 11:54:59 CET Diederik de Haas wrote:
Perhaps I didn't understand what you meant... Does the linux image
6.0.0.3 (6.0.7.2) include the patch correcting my issue ? And in this
case, is it sufficient to download the linux image and the linux headers
in order to test the result ?
No. In order to test the patch, you do need to build a kernel.
Oh boy, I probably should've stayed out of it completely ...
In another response to this bug, Salvatore did provide an alternative means
and that is using the kernel package he build for you.
See this part:
On woensdag 9 november 2022 17:42:44 CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Additionnally, I am not sure to know how to proceed in order to apply the
patch you sent. Could you give me some hint ?
There is our documentation at
https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4
.2.2 . But would you be willing to test (but be aware, unsigned!) test
packages fetched byhttps://people.debian.org ?
https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/linux/6.0.7-2/
I have put a sha256sum file with signature on it with my gpg key to
have an additional verification on those.
https://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=04A4407CB9142C23030C17AE789D6
F057FD863FE
So you have 2 options:
- build it yourself from source (with instructions from 4.2.2)
- Use the packages Salvatore build for you at the above location
Keep in mind that you normally shouldn't install programs ('deb' on Debian or
'exe' if on Windows) from "strangers on the internet". Salvatore did provide a
(gpg) signed file to provide some mitigation against the risks.
But you would still need to trust Salvatore.
If you build it yourself, then you don't download programs from "strangers on
the internet". But that obviously is more work. Which can be daunting if you
hadn't done that before.
HTH
(And now I'm really staying out of it ;-))
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Hi Salvatore, I did the test using the kernel image you built for me. After reactivating rasdaemon (and rebooting), all apparently work fine. I have a last question: Do I keep this version, and what will happen when the next kernel update occurs ? And what about the 6.0.0.2 one ? Thanks for your help ! Best regards. -- Guy. Le 09/11/2022 à 19:21, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Hi Guy, On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote: Hi Salvatore, OK, I will try that as soon as possible. Am I supposed to re-enable the rasdeamon once the patch applied ? Anyway I will report you the result (f I don't make any mistake). Yes right, the idea would be to boot the new kernel with rasdeamon enabled again and see if the system is stable again. Be aware though that rasdaemon itself might segfault, there is a second issue, where rasdaemon needs fixing as well, see #1023725. Regards, Salvatore
[bts-link] source package src:linux
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #1023192 (http://bugs.debian.org/1023192) # Bug title: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: Bluetooth no longer works: hci0: Reading Intel version command failed (-110) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215167 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 1023192 + status-NEW thanks
Bug#1023734: linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection
Hi Guy, [Thanks to Diederik for taking time as well to contribute!] On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 06:22:48PM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > I did the test using the kernel image you built for me. After reactivating > rasdaemon (and rebooting), all apparently work fine. Good news, thanks for your testing! So it's the same as #1023726. > I have a last question: Do I keep this version, and what will happen when > the next kernel update occurs ? And what about the 6.0.0.2 one ? As it is an unofficial build, please do revert back to an official one. I plan to upload 6.0.8-1 based on the today's released 6.0.8 "soonish" which will contain the fix as well. Hope this helps so far, Regards, Salvatore
Processed: forcibly merging 1023726 1023734
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1023726 1023734 Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference oops with rasdaemon Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference oops with rasdaemon Marked as found in versions linux/6.0.5-1. Bug #1023734 [src:linux] linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64: No network connection, no pulseaudio server connection Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAM6Wdxft33zLeeXHhmNX5jyJtfGTLiwkQSApc=10fqf+rqh...@mail.gmail.com/T/'. Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Marked as found in versions linux/6.0.7-1, linux/6.0.6-2, and linux/6.0.6-1. Added tag(s) upstream and pending. Merged 1023726 1023734 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1023726: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023726 1023734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023734 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1022900: grub-install, efibootmgr etc. not working with new kernel
Yesterday, kernel 6.0.8 was released with a number of EFI fixes. I have compiled the vanilla kernel and I am happy to confirm that it solves the issue. Regards
