[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:

> On Jan 04, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev.  Who knows what other newer
>> things newer kernels might require.
> OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we
> lack the manpower to backport for years fixes and new features RHEL-style.
> Do you have a better solution?

Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a
stable kernel tree, or something?

-- 
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to