Bug#589403: Update

2010-09-30 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
So I plugged the phone onto another computer that's running Debian
testing as well, and this time, it worked, and the phone was correctly
recognized as iface usb0. Networkmanager caught up and brought the
connection up just fine. That's very confusing.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca45fdf.3030...@free.fr



Bug#589403: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: rndis_host fails to create an interface for an HTC tatoo phone

2010-07-19 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
 Hello,

I've tried your module, but I get the "unknown symbol in module error"
when insmod'ing it. I successfully recompiled a new kernel with your
patch included instead:

jonat...@nala:/opt $ head linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/changelog
linux-2.6 (2.6.32-15a~test) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * Testing patches ../0001-rndis_host-Poll-status-and-control-channels-
concurre.patch

 -- root   Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:46:09 +0200

linux-2.6 (2.6.32-15) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Ben Hutchings ]
jonat...@nala:/opt $ stat /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
  File: `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686'
  Size: 2287168   Blocks: 4480   IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 805h/2053dInode: 644367  Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (0/root)   Gid: (0/root)
Access: 2010-07-19 16:53:32.0 +0200
Modify: 2010-07-19 16:33:40.0 +0200
Change: 2010-07-19 16:53:50.0 +0200
jonat...@nala:/opt $ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Installed-Size: 76188
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Architecture: i386
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15a~test

I did

dpkg -i --force-depends linux-image-... linux-headers-...

after the packages were built. dpkg complained about the linux-image
package having version ~test1 and requesting linux-base >=
2.6.32-5~test1, whereas my linux-base was only 2.6.32-5, which is why I
had to force the install. I still see no change with your patch applied,
sorry.

Output from dmesg

[  590.724628] scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC  Android Phone   
0100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2
[  590.742373] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk
[  594.006027] usb 1-3: USB disconnect, address 5
[  594.320128] usb 1-3: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and
address 6
[  594.465153] usb 1-3: New USB device found, idVendor=0bb4, idProduct=0ffe
[  594.465170] usb 1-3: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2,
SerialNumber=1
[  594.465182] usb 1-3: Product: Android Phone
[  594.465191] usb 1-3: Manufacturer: HTC
[  594.465200] usb 1-3: SerialNumber: SH9ANLG01978
[  594.465546] usb 1-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[  594.540898] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether
[  594.562132] usb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-:00:1d.7-3, RNDIS
device, 6a:b4:67:d3:a3:4f
[  594.562488] usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host
[  594.637517] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
[  594.637525] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
[  594.637530]  (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain,
max_eirp)
[  594.637539]  (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
[  594.637548]  (517 KHz - 519 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[  594.637557]  (519 KHz - 521 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[  594.637565]  (521 KHz - 523 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[  594.637574]  (523 KHz - 533 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[  594.637582]  (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
[  594.638068] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
[  594.652899] usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan

Is there anything I can do?

jonathan

On 07/18/2010 02:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 13:52 +0200, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply! I'm amazed.
>>
>> I cannot use your pre-built amd64 module because I'm not at work
>> anymore, and although I still have my phone with me, the machine I'm
>> using is a 686 now.
> There is also a 686 build in the same place.
>
>> I cannot apply your patch either. I'm running testing, and the
>> rndis_host.c file looks like this:
>>
>> int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
>> {
>> struct cdc_state*info = (void *) &dev->data;
>> intmaster_ifnum;
>> intretval;
>> unsignedcount;
>> __le32rsp;
>> u32xid = 0, msg_len, request_id;
>>
>> Which is obviously not what you diff'd against (the patch fails in this
>> area).
> [...]
>
> I think you're looking at the unpatched source.  You can use the
> debian/bin/test-patches script to apply the new patch.
>
> Ben.
>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c446b68.1040...@gmail.com



Bug#589403: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: rndis_host fails to create an interface for an HTC tatoo phone

2010-07-18 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
 Sorry for the confusion, test-patches works just fine, I'm building the
new kernel right now.

By the way, you might want to check your permissions, I'm getting errors
when trying to retrieve rndis_host.ko from your web directory.


  Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /~benh/rndis_host.ko.686 on this server.


On 07/18/2010 02:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 13:52 +0200, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply! I'm amazed.
>>
>> I cannot use your pre-built amd64 module because I'm not at work
>> anymore, and although I still have my phone with me, the machine I'm
>> using is a 686 now.
> There is also a 686 build in the same place.
>
>> I cannot apply your patch either. I'm running testing, and the
>> rndis_host.c file looks like this:
>>
>> int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
>> {
>> struct cdc_state*info = (void *) &dev->data;
>> intmaster_ifnum;
>> intretval;
>> unsignedcount;
>> __le32rsp;
>> u32xid = 0, msg_len, request_id;
>>
>> Which is obviously not what you diff'd against (the patch fails in this
>> area).
> [...]
>
> I think you're looking at the unpatched source.  You can use the
> debian/bin/test-patches script to apply the new patch.
>
> Ben.
>


Bug#589403: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: rndis_host fails to create an interface for an HTC tatoo phone

2010-07-18 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
 Hi,

Thanks for the quick reply! I'm amazed.

I cannot use your pre-built amd64 module because I'm not at work
anymore, and although I still have my phone with me, the machine I'm
using is a 686 now.

I cannot apply your patch either. I'm running testing, and the
rndis_host.c file looks like this:

int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
{
struct cdc_state*info = (void *) &dev->data;
intmaster_ifnum;
intretval;
unsignedcount;
__le32rsp;
u32xid = 0, msg_len, request_id;

Which is obviously not what you diff'd against (the patch fails in this
area).

jonat...@nala:/tmp $ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Installed-Size: 76316
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Architecture: i386
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15

Should I source linux-2.6 from unstable?

jonathan

On 07/17/2010 05:06 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 16:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
>> 2. Apply the attached patch and rebuild the kernel package by following
>> the instructions at
>> .
> Really attached this time.
>
> Ben.
>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c42eb19.3080...@gmail.com



Bug#589403: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: rndis_host fails to create an interface for an HTC tatoo phone

2010-07-17 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: important

So I own this HTC Tattoo phone, that supposedly has internet tethering support
when using the USB cable. Just to make things clear, I tested it under Windows.
It shows up as "HTC Remote NDIS based Device", and it uses the drivers
rndismpx.sys and usb8023x.sys from the system32\drivers directory.

There was an old driver (usb-rndis-lite) that shows up *a lot* in Google
results, but from what I could find, it has been merged with newer kernels, and
I'm not supposed to use this (it doesn't compile, anyway). Just in case, the
page at http://www.jooz.net/rndis/ which is about this old drivers mentions
compatibility with any windows device that uses the rndismp.sys and usb8023.sys
drivers, but mine uses rndismpX.sys and usb8023X.sys, don't know if that's
relevant.

Anyway, here's what dmesg gives.

[ 5746.540139] usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6
[ 5746.685343] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0bb4, idProduct=0c01
[ 5746.685360] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2,
SerialNumber=1
[ 5746.685373] usb 1-1: Product: Android Phone
[ 5746.685382] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: HTC
[ 5746.685390] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: SH9ANLG01978
[ 5746.685746] usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[ 5746.690316] scsi3 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
[ 5746.690759] usb-storage: device found at 6
[ 5746.690771] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
[ 5751.689934] usb-storage: device scan complete
[ 5751.693085] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access HTC  Android Phone0100
PQ: 0 ANSI: 2
[ 5751.709720] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk
[ 5755.759530] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 6
[ 5756.080155] usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7
[ 5756.225289] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0bb4, idProduct=0ffe
[ 5756.225306] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2,
SerialNumber=1
[ 5756.225319] usb 1-1: Product: Android Phone
[ 5756.225328] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: HTC
[ 5756.225336] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: SH9ANLG01978
[ 5756.225694] usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[ 5756.360311] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether
[ 5756.475454] usb0: register 'rndis_host' at usb-:00:1d.7-1, RNDIS device,
6a:b4:67:d3:a3:4f
[ 5756.475988] usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_host
[ 5756.573794] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
[ 5756.573810] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
[ 5756.573821]  (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain,
max_eirp)
[ 5756.573840]  (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
[ 5756.573859]  (517 KHz - 519 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[ 5756.573877]  (519 KHz - 521 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[ 5756.573896]  (521 KHz - 523 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[ 5756.573913]  (523 KHz - 533 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[ 5756.573931]  (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
[ 5756.573969] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
[ 5756.652142] usbcore: registered new interface driver rndis_wlan

So my device seems to be recognized fine (although I'm not sure what this
cfg80211 driver is about). But no interface is created, ifconfig still shows
eth0 (my network card), lo, and wlan0 (my wifi adapter). From what I could find
on Google, I should be seeing something like "eth1", but there's no such thing.

I've spent days googling and reading search results, but I couldn't come up
with anything close, even on kernel bugzilla, so I'm reporting here.

Please don't hesitate to request more information, as I'm eager to see this
fixed :).



-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-15) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:34:03 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64 
root=UUID=d151d68c-193d-4769-b41d-1bbc1c16b9ae ro quiet

** Tainted: P (1)
 * Proprietary module has been loaded.

** Kernel log:
[257127.763549] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257134.813961] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257144.253273] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257152.345623] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257161.492234] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257171.115752] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257179.121983] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257185.550294] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257191.075222] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257197.899420] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257204.458462] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257211.069375] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257220.589190] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257228.597568] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257236.576413] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257242.957273] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257249.014093] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257255.602119] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257265.566554] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257271.288303] icmpv6: msg of unknown type
[257280.321684] i

Bug#551663: Reopening

2010-06-26 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
 Sorry for the delay, I'm busy with other projects.

Just ran a test against latest 2.6.32-5 from testing and xset dpms force
off still doesn't work for the LVDS screen.

On 02/19/2010 08:47 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
>
>> Actually, the bug can be rewritten in a much simpler way.
>>
>> xset dpms force off does *not* work on my laptop's screen. If I plug in
>> an external screen, and disable the laptop's screen, xset dpms force off
>> actually turns off the external screen. If I enable the laptop's screen,
>> it prevents both screens from turning off. With no external monitor, it
>> doesn't work of course.
>>
>> jonat...@nala:~ $ uname -a
>> Linux nala 2.6.32.2 #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 15:44:54 CET 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Bug still present. I'm on testing, and I don't see a 2.6.32-8 package in
>> the repositories. Do you want me to install linux-image-2.6.32-trunk ?
> 2.6.32-8 package version is present in unstable, yes please test
> against it.
>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c25cd83.5020...@free.fr



Bug#580901: Confirmed

2010-05-10 Thread Jonathan Protzenko

 I have been experiencing this too, on a 4-core Xeon with hyperthreading.

Basically, what happens is that after a suspend/resume cycle or a 
hibernate/thaw cycle, a single process cannot span more than TWO cores. 
Here's a nice picture:


http://jonathan.protzenko.free.fr/beforesuspend.png

This is a build (make -j 16) of Mozilla Thunderbird. The build is highly 
parallel. The build dir was clean. All 8 logical cores are used.


http://jonathan.protzenko.free.fr/aftersuspend.png

Exact same build, after suspend. I did run make clean. Please note that 
only two cores are 100% busy and the other five do strictly nothing. The 
scheduler seems to be dead.


There is also a report here. 
http://superuser.com/questions/136291/core-i7-on-linux-loses-its-multithreading-capability-after-suspend.


I can provide more information if needed.

uname -a:
Linux sauternes 2.6.32-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 5 21:14:10 UTC 2010 x86_64 
GNU/Linux


cat /proc/cpuinfo:
processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 26
model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3520  @ 2.67GHz
stepping: 5
cpu MHz: 1596.000
cache size: 8192 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 0
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 0
initial apicid: 0
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 11
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall 
nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology 
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 
xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi 
flexpriority ept vpid

bogomips: 5333.12
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor: 1
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 26
model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3520  @ 2.67GHz
stepping: 5
cpu MHz: 1596.000
cache size: 8192 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 1
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 2
initial apicid: 2
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 11
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall 
nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology 
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 
xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi 
flexpriority ept vpid

bogomips: 5333.64
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor: 2
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 26
model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3520  @ 2.67GHz
stepping: 5
cpu MHz: 1596.000
cache size: 8192 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 2
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 4
initial apicid: 4
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 11
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall 
nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology 
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 
xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi 
flexpriority ept vpid

bogomips: 5333.37
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor: 3
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 26
model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3520  @ 2.67GHz
stepping: 5
cpu MHz: 1596.000
cache size: 8192 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 3
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 6
initial apicid: 6
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 11
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall 
nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology 
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 
xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi 
flexpriority ept vpid

bogomips: 5333.12
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor: 4
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 26
model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   W3520  @ 2.67GHz
stepping: 5
cpu MHz: 1596.000
cache size: 8192 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 0
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 1
initial apicid: 1
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 11
wp: yes
f

Bug#551663: Testing with the latest version

2010-03-16 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
jonat...@nala:~ $ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Installed-Size: 75208
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Architecture: i386
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9

jonat...@nala:~ $ apt-cache show xserver-xorg-video-intel | headPackage:
xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 1476
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force 
Architecture: i386
Version: 2:2.9.1-2

xset dpms force off still doesn't work as long as the laptop LVDS is not
disabled.

jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9fe16b.3070...@free.fr



Bug#551663: Reopening

2010-02-19 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
Actually, the bug can be rewritten in a much simpler way.

xset dpms force off does *not* work on my laptop's screen. If I plug in
an external screen, and disable the laptop's screen, xset dpms force off
actually turns off the external screen. If I enable the laptop's screen,
it prevents both screens from turning off. With no external monitor, it
doesn't work of course.

jonat...@nala:~ $ uname -a
Linux nala 2.6.32.2 #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 15:44:54 CET 2009 i686 GNU/Linux

Bug still present. I'm on testing, and I don't see a 2.6.32-8 package in
the repositories. Do you want me to install linux-image-2.6.32-trunk ?

On 02/13/2010 12:46 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
>
>   
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ok, sorry but I'm reopening this. It was kind of difficult to track it
>> down, but it is not fixed upstream (as of rc5). The condition to trigger
>> this bug is a bit subtle. Still running a 1920x1200 virtual on external
>> VGA1, we have :
>>
>> xrandr --output LVDS1 --auto (now 1024x600)
>> xrandr --output VGA1 --auto (now 1920x1200)
>> xrandr --output LVDS1 --off
>> xset dpms force off
>>
>> - --> *works*
>>
>> xrandr --output LVDS1 --auto (turns back on the laptop's screen)
>> xset dpms force off
>>
>> - --> *does not work*
>>
>> If you need additional information, feel free to ask.
>> 
> thanks for the follow up. yes we need feedback on 2.6.32-8 images,
> they should behave much better on KMS??
>   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b7e5493.9000...@free.fr



Bug#551663: Reopening

2009-10-22 Thread Jonathan Protzenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok, sorry but I'm reopening this. It was kind of difficult to track it
down, but it is not fixed upstream (as of rc5). The condition to trigger
this bug is a bit subtle. Still running a 1920x1200 virtual on external
VGA1, we have :

xrandr --output LVDS1 --auto (now 1024x600)
xrandr --output VGA1 --auto (now 1920x1200)
xrandr --output LVDS1 --off
xset dpms force off

- --> *works*

xrandr --output LVDS1 --auto (turns back on the laptop's screen)
xset dpms force off

- --> *does not work*

If you need additional information, feel free to ask.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrgunMACgkQaAzAp091CaDtKACfQ2adUao861OMak9m8f0iscAR
qRYAnA1NLY3Mtxnpr0jnWHuHmKQ8BJWs
=XwWo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org