Bug#678957: btrfs-tools: snapshot of a subvolume in itself behaves strangely
Actually the invisible directory xxx/xxx created by btrfs subvolume snapshot . xxx can be removed by rmdir xxx/xxx. (Martin Ziegler) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1206270836530.21...@zertz.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Bug#534598: bisection
Dear Maximilian, the bisecting resulted in + c5a4bcd0cac546c5d776af881c5e913ba4a9922d is the first bad commit commit c5a4bcd0cac546c5d776af881c5e913ba4a9922d Author: Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de Date: Fri Feb 6 17:22:05 2009 +0100 ALSA: hda - Use digital beep for AD codecs Use digital beep instead of analog pc-beep for AD codecs. Create the beep mixer controls dynamically on demand. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de :04 04 a8cd08b609a39ff23952d7f475a2a22100c91205 1f01f6ce27db017ed638c05ff2d806d1933babd3 M sound Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1006061553510.8...@zertz.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Bug#534598:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, maximilian attems wrote: the best would probably be a bisect on linux-2.6 upstream between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, do you need guidance on that? I'd like to do that. How do I find (compile?) the older kernels? Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1002172137350.26...@zertz.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Bug#534598:
Yes, with linux-image-2.6.32-2-686 2.6.32-8 it is still the same. Martin On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Martin Ziegler wrote: It seems to be only a boot problem: After modprobe -r pcspkr; modprobe pcspkr the console beeps again. hmm does still happen with latest 2.6.32 ?? thanks for feedback. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#432877: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: adjtimex changes frequency-offset incorrectl\y
Sorry, the bug is still there as before. Here is the content of /proc/version: Linux version 2.6.22-1-686 (Debian 2.6.22-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-14)) #1 SMP Sun Jul 29 14:37:42 UTC 2007 By the way: If I run the program as non--root, it reports the new frequency as 128350. But changes nothing, of course. Do You need further information? Regards, Martin On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, maximilian attems wrote: i guess the bug can be closed, please double check against 2.6.22 and report back. regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432877: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: adjtimex changes frequency-offset incorrectl\y
Hi, 2.6.23-rc2 has the same behaviour. To set frequencies in multiples of 16 is good enough, but it could break software which relied on different behaviour until kernel 2.6.18 ( or on different behaviour on other machines.) So I would consider it as a bug. Regards, Martin On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, maximilian attems wrote: ok, two possibilities arise 1) you are happy and we close it off. 2) you see that as a bug and report it upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org for 2 i'd wait 24 hours as 2.6.23-rc2 should be available soonest as trunk linux image build, see apt lines - http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
