Re: Kernel 2.6.38 for squeeze
Am 17.04.11 06:01, schrieb Thomas Goirand: I have an old laptop with a bad internal WiFi board, so I bought a newer RaLink driver. To make it work, I had to add the option rt2800usb - Include support for rt33xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL) and rt2800usb - Include support for rt35xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL). These are not activated in your build (I've just checked). I believe that one of the most important point of running a backported kernel is to have such drivers for newer hardware. Could you please include the option above? The options to activate are as below: CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT33XX CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT35XX CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT33XX CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX If you include the above options, I'll be able to test your backport instead of the quick and dirty one that I did myself. That's something that should be done in the package itself, not just in the backport. I added the debian-kernel mailinglist to CC, but you should just file a bugreport against the package in unstable. Regards Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4daae8c9.60...@tretkowski.de
Re: [Debian-ha-maintainers] drbd in linux-2.6
Hi Dann, Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: I'd appreciate it if an existing drbd user could test it. I didn't hear back from the drbd maintainers, but I did get some testing feedback from a drbd user (thanks to Lukasz Oles, bcc'd) sorry for not coming back to you earlier, I was quite out-of-order for the last weeks because of a skiing accident. My plan is therefore to: 1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package No problem from my side. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1270633379.2354.4.ca...@moonlight.office.ip-exchange.de
Bug#511085: 60 seconds timeout for ipconfig is not enough
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92n Hi, in 0.92m, the timeout for ipconfig in scripts/functions was set to 60 seconds. This broke our iscsi-rootfs setups. It took me a while to debug this, but it seems that 60 seconds is not enough for switches which have spanning-tree enabled, they need some more time before they take up a port, in our case between 62 and 65 seconds. Please raise the timeout to 90 or 120 seconds. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Towards consensus of our usage of the Uploaders field
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:32 -0600, dann frazier wrote: [...] Does this match other people's interpretations? Yes. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305330: starfire NIC driver on alpha
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Norbert said he was going to contact the upstream maintainer of the driver, but there's no information about what came of that. Unfortunately I never got a reply. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Areca ARC1110 SATA RAID adapter
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 15:43 +0100, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: Or would it be possible to have the Areca driver backported to the Debian 2.4.18 kernel? The Areca driver is part of the Debian kernel since 2.6.18-2. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410933: alpha: Could not allocate X bytes percpu data
* Steve Langasek wrote: [...] Norbert, do you have any further thoughts on this? It's still on my radar, I hope to find some time to take a closer look at it next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410933: alpha: Could not allocate X bytes percpu data
* Andras HORVATH wrote: linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from Could not allocate X bytes percpu data when loading modules (for example, xfs, eepro100 and e100). I've found this discussion (regarding the previous version, linux-image-2.6.18-3-alpha-smp): http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-alpha@lists.debian.org/msg23999.html where this patch was suggested: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=116593521703170w=2 Could (the|a) fix please be included in the next release please? I'd be all too happy to go back to distro kernels from self-built ones. Unfortunately, that patch doesn't really help: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/12/msg00565.html Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'
tags 409222 +moreinfo thanks * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each plus several 5 second retries. Sounds like #391867 which was fixed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9, please retry with the latest kernel. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: confirmed : problem fixed
* Fabrice Lorrain wrote: Targeting this kernel for etch would be appreciated. It is targeted for etch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Michael Richters wrote: I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels cannot access /dev/rtc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] # hwclock --show select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out This same error occurs when the system is booting. Could you please retry the above command using the --directisa option? That works: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] # hwclock --directisa --show Fri Dec 22 09:52:27 2006 -0.565819 seconds Okay... as a temporary workaround, add the --directisa option to $HWCLOCKPARS in /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels cannot access /dev/rtc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] # hwclock --show select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out This same error occurs when the system is booting. Could you please retry the above command using the --directisa option? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels cannot access /dev/rtc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] # hwclock --show select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out This same error occurs when the system is booting. Same here on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Frederik Schueler wrote: [...] The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes. Is there a new schedule already? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330664: feed back: logs of crashing SMP kernel with QLA1040
* DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote: Could not allocate 16 bytes percpu data 2.6.18-2 and newer include a workaround for this problem. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: port is slow to respond on computer with SATA disk
* David Lazar wrote: Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Could you please try if the kernel from http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/ fixes this problem? If it works for you, I'm going to add this patch to 2.6.18-9. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch It's on my TODO list for this weekend. This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was also reported by James Andrewartha on debian-alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Frederik Schueler wrote: If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can discuss them. You may want to apply this patch. This problem was reported before on debian-alpha http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch It's on my TODO list for this weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Holger Levsen wrote: On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote: 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI which version of the patch is it? 2.0.2.2-rc6 and 2.0.2.2-rc9 has a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic while restarting vservers. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: port is slow to respond on computer with SATA disk
* David Lazar wrote: Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Same hardware here, same problem. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408 If this patch is part of 2.6.19 or 2.6.20, it should be added. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.18-5 schedule
* maximilian attems wrote: nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies. Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.18-5 schedule
* maximilian attems wrote: nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies. Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#397139: ftbfs alpha + ia64
* Falk Hueffner wrote: This updated patch instead of alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch should help: Are you going to add this patch to the next gcc-4.1 upload? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
* Frederik Schueler wrote: - alpha gcc-4.1 migration It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r7634 - in dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian: . arch arch/alpha
* Bastian Blank wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Log: Switched alpha to gcc-4.1, bumped ABI revision. I don't see a discussion about the ABI name change. There was a discussion about switching alpha to gcc-4.1 about two weeks ago. I revert that. Then you also need to revert the compiler switch on alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch Included in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 22:52]: * Jurij Smakov wrote: What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1? Yes. Anybody can run a build and make the log available? Tomorrow. FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch Thanks, I'll give it a try. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first upload today. Is there an .orig.tar.gz already? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* maximilian attems wrote: It didn't fix the problem. one first shot would be to lower CONFIG_NR_CPUS in config.alpha-smp Tried that already. or otherwise one could use a similar hack than the one proposed here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=115507250028744w=2 Didn't work either. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing 2.6.17-7
* Steve Langasek wrote: Frederik Schueler wrote: #369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data The alpha smp kernel didn't work in sarge either. I would suggest dropping this flavor until someone steps up to maintain it. Agreed, I'm going to drop the smp flavour in 2.6.17-10. My alphas have always been UP, so I have no interest in it myself. Same for me, none of my alphas have more than one processor. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* Andras Horvath wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel currently... It didn't fix the problem. if that's 2.6.17-2 then I'm sorry to report that -smp still doesn't work (same scsi errors; see attached log). -generic works fine though. Since smp on alpha seems quite broken currently, I'm going to drop the smp flavour with the next upload. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Andras Horvath wrote: but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems.. Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend. I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel currently... Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Christian T. Steigies wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Bastian Blank wrote: At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have to be solved quickly. Aha. Really? No. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
tags 369517 +confirmed thanks * Andras Horvath wrote: [...] but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems.. Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Bastian Blank wrote: The following arches did not yet switch to gcc-4.1: - alpha Linux 2.6.17 doesn't compile with gcc 4.1 on alpha. At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have to be solved quickly. Aha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Frederik Schueler wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have to be solved quickly. Aha. How is the alpha-vserver flavour coming along? ;-) It's still on my todo list, but due to some personal and job-related changes in my life I didn't find the time for it until now. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn games
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After repeating my question a few times, I was able to deduce from Bastian's one-word replies that he talked to someone else on ftp-master team and was assured that the rejection of sparc binaries was still possible. Bastian tends to ignore uncomfortable questions. Nothing new. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Frederik Schueler wrote: What is the status of the other architectures? alpha Test-build is running currently. 2.6.17 is ready on alpha, kernel built and works fine. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: What is the status of the other architectures? alpha Test-build is running currently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Overtake ITP
owner 304330 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner 333695 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks * Bastian Blank wrote: As there was no progress over 2 months in this two ITP and the kernel team was asked to provide support for the kernel included iscsi support, I overtake both ITP in favour of the kernel team. Next time just ask before doing something. Packages are ready for upload, and I'm going to upload them within the next days. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367570: unknown symbols in sound modules
* Frederik Schueler wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:47:43PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: After the upgrade to 2.6.16 (from 2.6.15), I started seeing the following errors during boot: rerunning alsaconf fixes this. No, it doesn't, I'm still seeing these errors during boot after rerunning alsaconf. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS Release version does not match the current version
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable. Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling the first upload of 2.6.17-rc to experimental
* Frederik Schueler wrote: I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday, this leaves 4 days for preparations. I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I don't know if I'm able to update the configs. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Bastian Blank wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded. There was. Where? Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 have been announced. Bastian? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
python2.4-minimal dependency
Currently the linux-patch-debian-* and linux-support-* packages depending on python2.4-minimal. According[0] to Steve, the python-minimal package should not be used as a dependency by other packages. I think it's the same for python2.4-minimal. Norbert [0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/04/msg01063.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upload of 2.6.16-10
Hi, 2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha. Any objections? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Frederik Schueler wrote: Do we have the resources to check the next upload for all architectures within a day or two? No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which are available for alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which are available for alpha. Which sort of machine? EV56, 433 MHz, 192 MB RAM. What happens if you use ccache? It faster? I haven't tried it recently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Bastian Blank wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded. There was. Where? Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 have been announced. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice. I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded. 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted to fix it. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded. There was. Where? 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted to fix it. 2.6.16.10 is scheduled for tomorrow. Does it fix the build problem on alpha? Otherwise I don't care. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364206: linux-source-2.6.16: 2.6.16.6 patch to arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c references for_each_possible_cpu
tags 364206 +pending thanks * Nicholas Riley wrote: The 2.6.16.6 patch contains a reference to for_each_possible_cpu, which is not present until 2.6.17. It should be replaced with for_each_cpu. This causes the package to fail to build on Alpha. Thanks, I added your patch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backports of linux-2.6 and dependencies
* Bastian Blank wrote: The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed packages to run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg initramfs-tools) are outdated, That's because backports.org is based on testing, not unstable. It's the same reason why 2.6.16 isn't available on backports.org yet, but I already prepared updated linux-image, udev and initramfs-tools backports on http://people.backports.org/~tretkowski/upload/ some are seriously broken (linux-2.6 uses the same abiname as the versions in sid/etch but provides a different abi due to the usage of another compiler). Indeed. The advantages of this solution, compared to the current status, are automatic updates on new release of udev/klibc/whatever And automatic breakage when something in unstable breaks. That's why we're using testing. To implement this solution, we need help from both the backport and the kernel team: we need autobuilders and we need someone for every arch to verify and approve the packages for the archive. An updated version of kernel-package (and make as it's dependency) is also needed. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.16 released - 2.6.16-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs: alpha Nope, buildd had no problems. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.16-1arch=alphafile=log Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: preparing 2.6.16-rc2-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: The svn branch to be used is dists/trunk/linux-2.6/ It's based on 2.6.15-3, what about the changes in -4, -5, -6 and the not yet uploaded -7? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6 ftbfs on testing
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because 2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (= 10.029), but testing has 9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble with kernel 2.6.15
* Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote: I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems very bizarre. I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could you try to rebuilt the initrd with initramfs-tools? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347186: linux-image-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: garbled Matrox framebuffer
* Sven Luther wrote: matroxfb is problematic, since the matroxfb maintainer didn't agree on the 2.4-2.6 fbdev API change, and thus things broke all over, and has a huge patch that reverses the new fbdev stuff. At least this was the case a year or two back at least. Last time I tried matroxfb on alpha (IIRC it was with 2.5.68), this patch helped to get it working correctly: ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/linux/matrox-latest/ I thought that patch was integrated upstream already, but there's a patch against 2.6.15-rc4, so I don't think it was integrated already. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339080: Frequent crash in handle_IRQ_event on alpha with kernel 2.6
tags 339080 +pending thanks * Uwe Schindler wrote: Looking through the kernel surces of the different architectures I have seen that almost all architectures use the same irq.c code. In newer kernels ( 2.6.8) for example x86, ia64, amd64, powerpc, parisc change to a generic IRQ handler code. The others are not yet changed, others have different IRQ handlers. Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2. Thanks for your time, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339080: Frequent crash in handle_IRQ_event on alpha with kernel 2.6
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2. http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=eee45269b0f5979c70bc151c6c2f4e5f4f5ababe http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0595bf3bca9d9932a05b06dd438f40f01d27cd33 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346173: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:49! (possibly fglrx related)
* James McCaw wrote: Since upgrading to kernel 2.6.15 (from 2.6.14) I now get this kernel message consistently when running fgl_glxgears (provided by fglrx driver package) or standard glxgears. It may be an error with the binary fglrx driver, but given the specific reference to mm/swap.c:49 I thought I should post the bug report here. As you can see, below is 4th time since reboot that I ran a GL program: Sounds like bug #345040... please retry with this updated package of flgrx-driver: http://people.debian.org/~nobse/fglrx-driver/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346107: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: missing acpi sleep support
* Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote: after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore (/proc/acpi/sleep is missing). What's wrong with /sys/power/state? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346107: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: missing acpi sleep support
severity 346107 normal reassign 346107 klaptopdaemon merge 337502 346107 thanks * Jim Hague wrote: On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 18:25, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote: after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore (/proc/acpi/sleep is missing). What's wrong with /sys/power/state? Currently klaptopdaemon for one only works with /proc/acpi/sleep. In this particular case it seems (Bug#337502) a fix will be coming in the KDE 3.5 packages. Not a kernel bug, reassigning to klaptopdaemon and merging with #337502. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346141: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp: the package doesn't configure
reassign 346141 yaird severity 346141 important merge 341524 346141 thanks * Fabien COUTANT wrote: You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version 2.6.15-1-k7-smp) on a machine currently running kernel version 2.4.31-k7-smp. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341524 In short, yaird doesn't work on kernel 2.4. Known limitation in yaird, and not a bug in the kernel. As a workaround, update to 2.6.8-2-k7-smp first. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bits from the release team
* Gabor Gombas wrote: Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases, and this is what upstream needs the most. We already had some -rc releases in experimental for 2.6.14 and 2.6.15. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing 2.6.15-rc7 for experimental
* Frederik Schueler wrote: The following architectures need their configs still to be updated: alpha Current svn (and rc7.experimental1 too) builds fine on alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342931: doesn't work on alpha
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.42 Severity: normal I gave initramfs-tools a new try on my alpha, but it failed to create a working initrd: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! The qla1280 module is the right one for my rootfilesystem, the ext3 module is also loaded. Using break=mount: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 system hangs Using break=init: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. system hangs Please ask if you need more informations. I'm really interested to get initramfs-tools working on alpha, because it's not possible to upgrade from a running 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel with yaird. Regards, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Proposed Kernel Updates for Sid: Round 1
* Horms wrote: * Recently fixed, in the most need of testing kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha I'm going to take a look at those next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ABI changes on specific architectures only
Hi, I switched the alpha build from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0 in the not yet uploaded 2.6.14-3, and Jurij said he'll also switch sparc from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0. How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110
* Bill Gatliff wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Version: 2.6.12-10 Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337497: initramfs-tools: [powerpc] doesn't work on pegasos - ALERT! /dev/hda1 does
* Sven Luther wrote: ALERT!: /dev/hda1 does not exist, Dropping to a shell! I saw the same on my notebook (i386) when using MODULES=dep in initramfs.conf. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337072: linux-image-2.6.14-1-386: XFS Quota Support missing
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Kim Hansen wrote: The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to add a new patch to svn yet. It's indeed in the queue for 2.6.14.1. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit messages
* Horms wrote: On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: would it be possible to apply the following patchlet to /srv/svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/hooks/post-commit? [...] Sure, though I don't seem to be able to check hooks/post-commit out :( You have to login at costa and edit it there directly. I already did that. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337072: linux-image-2.6.14-1-386: XFS Quota Support missing
* Kim Hansen wrote: The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to add a new patch to svn yet. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333842: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333842: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now there is shown as the content of /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686/.extraversion 2.6.14-1-686 This is the full version, rather than the persumably desired EXTRAVERSION component This is fixed in 2.6.14-2 from unstable. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: udev issue
* Elimar Riesebieter wrote: $ -depmod -a zsh: command not found: -depmod if it is a shell command that won't work. From the GNU make documentation: , | To ignore errors in a command line, write a `-' at the beginning of | the line's text (after the initial tab). ` http://www.cs.utah.edu/dept/old/texinfo/make/make_toc.html#SEC46 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel package
* roberto wrote: i am looking for the latest downloadable kernel-source-2.6.x package for sarge, but i did not find anything later than 2.6.8 in http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.en-gb.html#search_packages The kernel-source package is architecture independent, you can use the one from unstable: http://debian.n-ix.net/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.14_2.6.14-1_all.deb Regards, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: x86 kernel flavours was: 2.6.14-1 in incoming, status and future
* Anand Kumria wrote: I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until I picked the right kernel package. Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.14-1 in incoming, status and future
* Sven Luther wrote: but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the build success, we can do -2. Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
* Horms wrote: I've put the packages in http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/ incase they dissapear from other sources. The ABI revision in the version number is missing in those packages. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
* Horms wrote: I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and assuming the i386 build completes I will upload. I already know it doesn't compile on HPPA, and I expect other FTBFS. It will fail on alpha too, I hope I'll find time next weekend to update the configs. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: volatile backport
* Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Andres Salomon wrote: I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not have it require any further backports. Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for backports.org, but I used a backported kernel-package for the build. http://www.backports.org/pending/linux-2.6/ Is this the same backported kernel-package that i provide? Or your own stuff? It's a separate backport of kernel-package. What do you do for udev and futur yaird/initramfs ? There's also a udev backport. And I need to add a yaird/initramfs backport when I add add the backport of 2.6.13. How does backports.org work? Is it autobuilt? If yes we could use that and forget about volatile for now. Not yet, but Joerg Jaspert is working on the setup currently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13 kernel
* Allyn, Mark A wrote: Does anyone know what the plans are for 2.6.13, which is now available from www.kernel.org? I notice that unstable (sid) is still at 2.6.12. http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/09/msg00458.html I have just subscribed to this email list; I apologize if this question was repeated recently. Here's the list archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328424: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: does not update grub/menu.lst
* Peter Eisentraut wrote: I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched. Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#328424: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: does not update grub/menu.lst
* Peter Eisentraut wrote: I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched. Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* dann frazier wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote: 2.4.27 is building. And done: http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27 Works fine on my sparc64. Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Horms wrote: 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security Builds finished on alpha. http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/alpha/sarge/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* Horms wrote: I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed for some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC). 2.4.27 is also still needed for the alpha installer. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.12 upload
* Andres Salomon wrote: - there are 3 patches that were in 2.6.11 that have been dropped due to lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine their value, at some point. The dropped alpha patch is no longer required with 2.6.12, at least on my systems the kernel works fine without it. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel updates accepted for sarge
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Steve Langasek wrote: If there are updates to unstable pending for any other architectures, please let debian-release know. I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, upload tomorrow. Uploaded, please approve for sarge. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel updates accepted for sarge
* Steve Langasek wrote: If there are updates to unstable pending for any other architectures, please let debian-release know. I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, upload tomorrow. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel Security Updates for Sarge
* Horms wrote: 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out of date in SVN) I'm going to upload kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha 2.4.27-9 next weekend, built against kernel-tree-2.4.27-8, because 2.4.27-8 made it into testing by mistake. I'm not sure what you mean with 'seems to be out of date in SVN', SVN is up to date. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: config.gz files
* Nico Golde wrote: why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file via /proc? Because the file is available in '/boot/config-$(uname -r)'. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305330: kernel driver starfire for the Alpha architecture
* Bob Lindell wrote: [...] I added an additional || defined (__alpha__) expression and compiled the driver. I tested it on a PC164 running the Sarge 2.4.27-2-generic kernel. Seems to run correctly on the Alpha. All 4 ports of the card worked properly. This fix needs to make it upstream to the driver maintainer for the Linux kernel. It is broken on the Alpha for all recent 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Thanks for your bugreport. I'll contact upstream of the starfire driver within the next few days. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304028: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: No Mouse
reassign 304028 discover thanks * Florian Hars wrote: maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Florian Hars wrote: If I boot into 2.6.8-2, I have no mouse. i presume that you are not using hotplug/discover. I most definitely use discover, as I found out the hard way (/etc/rcS/S36discover caused a kernel panic by loading two conflicting SCSI drivers, see bug #301486). This bug was fixed with the uploads of kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-9 and initrd-tools 0.1.78 from yesterday. I have no module mousedev, but modprobe psmouse activated the mouse. Now, why doesn't it work out of the box? Good question... I have no idea. Looks like a bug in discover to me, not really kernel related, so I'm reassigning it. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304095: kernel-image-2.6.11: Getting loads of ERROR Removing module 'xxxxx' at the end of kernel loading
* Jaap Haitsma wrote: I get around 10 messages which say something like ERROR Removing module 'x' where is a name of some module just before init starts http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/03/msg00114.html Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler
reassign 301486 discover1 thanks * Florian Hars wrote: It wasn't a initrd problem at all, /etc/rcS/S36discover was the culprit. If I disable qlogicisp for discover, 2.6.8-2 boots. Alright, thanks for feedback and reporting! So I'm reassigning this bugreport to discover1, see #289995 for details. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt
* Florian wrote: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Hmm... what's the output of 'lspci' on your system? Here it is: :00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 30) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Contaq Microsystems 82c693 :00:07.1 IDE interface: Contaq Microsystems 82c693 :00:07.2 IDE interface: Contaq Microsystems 82c693 :00:07.3 USB Controller: Contaq Microsystems 82c693 :00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: Digital Equipment Corporation PBXGB [TGA2] (rev 22) :00:14.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 (rev 03) :01:04.0 SCSI storage controller: QLogic Corp. ISP1020 Fast-wide SCSI (rev 05) This is what 2.4.27 says. Hmm... I'm wondering why qla1280 is included... For a workaround, replace 'qlogicisp' in /usr/sbin/mkinitrd with 'qla1280' and make sure qlogicisp is not listed in /etc/mkinitrd/modules and /etc/modules. Then run the following command: mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-2.6.8-2-generic /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-generic Reboot the system, qlogicisp shouldn't get loaded from the initrd and the system should run fine. I'll try to modify mkinitrd accordingly ASAP. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
* hars wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:48:18PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Why are you loading both, qlogicisp _and_ qla1280 on boot? Disabling the qlogicisp module should fix your problem. I didn't do anything, I just booted the kernel as installed by apt-get. Hmm... what's the output of 'lspci' on your system? The problem is that both, qlogicisp and qla1280 are included in your initrd, that's known to make problems. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301486: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
* Florian Hars wrote: Loading qlogicisp module. ERROR: SCSI host `isp1020' has no error handling ERROR: This is not a safe way to run your SCSI host ERROR: The error handling must be added to this driver fc000fb2bdf8 fffc00385db0 fffc0026a390 fffc00386968 fffc00386968 fc000febb800 fffc00386968 fc00 fc000fb2be40 fc000fb2be40 fc000febb800 fffc00370047 fffc00386968 fffc0037a08c fffc00386968 fc59e800 fffc0026204c fffc00386968 fc59e800 fffc00386a48 fc59e800 fc59c778 Trace: [fc34ddcc] sys_init_module+0x1cc/0x3d0 [fc315244] entSys+0xa4/0xc0 qlogicisp : new isp1020 revision ID (5) scsi0 : QLogic ISP1020 SCSI on PCI bus 01 device 20 irq 27 I/O base 0x8000 [...] qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 4 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 01c8 swapper(0): Oops 1 Why are you loading both, qlogicisp _and_ qla1280 on boot? Disabling the qlogicisp module should fix your problem. Unfortunately I had no time to modify initrd-tools so qla1280 is used for ISP1020 controllers. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
