Bug#750360: systemd-sysv: breaks NFS root systems
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 07:49:08PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: thank you very much, pushed out to initramfs repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git will upload soonish. Hi. It's two months later and people (e.g. me!) are being bitten by this bug when upgrading to systemd. Can I help with getting this fix uploaded? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#714497: More info: not found in 3.8-2-amd64
Hi, I booted my old kernel (3.8-2) and the problem has gone away, so it is definitely something in the 3.9 kernel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201307012203.16387.st...@sumost.ca
Bug#714497: kernel BUG at /build/linux-eHaf39/linux-3.9.6/include/drm/drm_mm.h:100
Package: src:linux Version: 3.9.6-1 Severity: important File: /boot/vmlinuz-3.9-1-amd64 Hi, I shut off the monitors and leave my computer running when not using it (still logged into the X session). Four times in the past week, I've returned (hours or days later) to find that the X session is 'locked up': the display looks OK, but does not respond to mouse motion or keyboard input. I've simply power-cycled the machine to recover. Below is a sample sequence from kern.log. All four instances look similar and all start with Failed to find memory space Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139471] [TTM] Failed to find memory space for buffer 0x88014da81448 eviction Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139476] [TTM] No space for 88014da81448 (41832 pages, 167328K, 163M) Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139478] [TTM] placement[0]=0x00010002 (1) Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139480] [TTM] has_type: 1 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139481] [TTM] use_type: 1 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139482] [TTM] flags: 0x000A Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139483] [TTM] gpu_offset: 0x2000 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139485] [TTM] size: 131072 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139486] [TTM] available_caching: 0x0007 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139487] [TTM] default_caching: 0x0001 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139523] [ cut here ] Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139550] kernel BUG at /build/linux-eHaf39/linux-3.9.6/include/drm/drm_mm.h:100! Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139586] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.139609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 nls_cp437 vfat fat usb_storage tcp_diag inet_diag nfnetlink_queue nfnetlink_log nfnetlink parport_pc ppdev lp parport cuse tun cpufreq_userspace cp ufreq_powersave cpufreq_stats cpufreq_conservative snd_hrtimer pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) binfmt_misc uinput nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl nfs lockd dns_resolver fscache sunrpc loop firewire_sbp2 fu se dm_crypt dm_mod snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_analog uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_core videodev media snd_usb_audio snd_usbmidi_lib snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_os s snd_pcm coretemp kvm_intel snd_page_alloc snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event iTCO_wdt radeon snd_rawmidi acpi_cpufreq mperf iTCO_vendor_support processor kvm snd_seq ttm pcspkr i2c_i801 lpc_ich mfd_core thermal_sys snd_seq_dev ice snd_timer snd drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core asus_atk0110 soundcore evdev button ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sg sr_mod sd_mod cdrom crc_t10dif ata_generic hid_generic usbhid hid pata_marvell firewire_ohci skge firew ire_core crc_itu_t ahci libahci microcode sky2 ehci_pci uhci_hcd ehci_hcd libata scsi_mod usbcore usb_common Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140295] CPU 2 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140307] Pid: 6141, comm: kwin Tainted: G O 3.9-1-amd64 #1 Debian 3.9.6-1 System manufacturer P5Q-E/P5Q-E Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140356] RIP: 0010:[a02104f3] [a02104f3] drm_mm_hole_node_start+0x6/0x11 [drm] Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140411] RSP: 0018:8801e08bf950 EFLAGS: 00010246 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140436] RAX: ed73ed73 RBX: 880224060180 RCX: 0007 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140468] RDX: ed73 RSI: a0289d2c RDI: 8802240600d0 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140500] RBP: a0289d2c R08: 0002 R09: 814ec0f2 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140533] R10: R11: 8801b62ded00 R12: 880223faa640 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140565] R13: R14: 8802240600c0 R15: 880223faa9c0 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140598] FS: 7fb4f973f780() GS:88022fd0() knlGS: Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140634] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140660] CR2: 7fb4dce89ea0 CR3: 0001e08ae000 CR4: 27e0 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140693] DR0: DR1: DR2: Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140726] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140758] Process kwin (pid: 6141, threadinfo 8801e08be000, task 8801e0836830) Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140793] Stack: Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140804] a0210789 880224060180 8802240600c0 880223faa640 Jun 26 23:02:23 localhost kernel: [370417.140848]
Bug#714497: More info: also found in RedHat
It seems this bug is reported at least four times to Fedora project, so it's likely an upstream issue. Fedora references: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964120 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967282 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975073 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976577 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201306291924.14122.st...@sumost.ca
Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:04:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: for most userspace apps there exist working patches as documented by post of libdc1394 maintainer. That's irrelevant. There is manifestly a problem with video. It was reported in August of last year. You can't credibly continue to claim 8 months later that everything is hunky dory. It was not then and is not now. we reverted for etch+half, if userspace stays as lame as currently it is still an option for Lenny but we'd prefer out of several provided grounds not to be forced to do that. Rather than complaining about the lame userspace, work with them to apply the requisite patches. Debian is about building a *system* in support of our users. Some of us want to use video out of the box. It's not that much to ask, is it? Chimo, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#436267: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686: IEEE1394 modules unbuilt in packaged kernel
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:59:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:56AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Git repos are not relevant here. they are fucking important, but it seems that the firewire lib maintainers are quite lame. I'm sad to read a response that seems to be blaming and finger-pointing. Debian is about building a *system* and we all need to work together to that end. It seems to me that if you make a change that in turn requires a change in other packages -- indeed, it explicitly *breaks* other packages -- then it is incumbent on you to work with the other package maintainers to achieve the required changes. In the present case, it appears that the libraw maintainer, for one, wasn't informed (c.f. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453358). -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#436267: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686: IEEE1394 modules unbuilt in packaged kernel
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:17:28PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: As noted by Guus Sliepen, switching from a functioning driver to an experimental driver with no library support is not going to cause the latter to be improved. It's simply annoying to the user. that is a pretty bold incompetent statement, for all relevant libraries patches exists. take them out of the corresponding git repos. By user, I meant Debian user. There is manifestly no library support for the Debian user. Git repos are not relevant here. The linux1394.org people say: At the time of this writing (12/2007), there are still multiple problems with the new FireWire kernel driver stack (alias Juju) compared to the old stack [...] Regarding Linux 2.6.22 and 2.6.23, the best advice to Linux distributors (kernel packagers) as well as to regular users is: Build only the old IEEE 1394 drivers. http://wiki.linux1394.org/JujuMigration et ceterum censo aboves quote is from 1 of the 2 maintainers. the other maintainer considered it fit enough for fedora stable release 7 and 8. And the Fedora users are complaining as well. I cannot see how you think it improves things to produce a system (Debian Sid) with an unusable 1394 subsystem. It is clearly not being tested nor improved, since anyone who wants to use it is rebuilding the kernel with the old drivers again! the new stack has many advantages: - leaner codebase (less than 8k lines of code compared to 30k lines of code in the old stack) - cleaned-up and improved in-stack APIs (with the side effect of getting rid of a bunch of old bugs) - design (no kernel threads, compared to one subsystem thread and one thread per FireWire controller in the old stack) Those are all great theoretical advantages. None of them matter to me, as a user. What matters is a working system. And Debian is -- allegedly -- about the users. In that light, I would think that the best approach is: 1. Make sure all libraries are patched. 2. Switch the kernel module. Rather than the other way around. Best regards, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#436267: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686: IEEE1394 modules unbuilt in packaged kernel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:32:36PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: hello, On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:20:26PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: another application stopped working after this kernel change. It is coriander. I do not know if all applications must be fixed or if a fix in the 1394 libraries is enough. Unfortunately libraries are not fixed yet, see bug #453358 : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453358 that is expected and thus the switch to juju is made early in the release cycle. enough time to fix those up. As noted by Guus Sliepen, switching from a functioning driver to an experimental driver with no library support is not going to cause the latter to be improved. It's simply annoying to the user. The linux1394.org people say: At the time of this writing (12/2007), there are still multiple problems with the new FireWire kernel driver stack (alias Juju) compared to the old stack [...] Regarding Linux 2.6.22 and 2.6.23, the best advice to Linux distributors (kernel packagers) as well as to regular users is: Build only the old IEEE 1394 drivers. http://wiki.linux1394.org/JujuMigration Please consider enabling the working driver until userspace libraries exist for the new one. Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303918: acknowledged by developer (closing 303918)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:51:22PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #303918: Patch to support IT8212 on-board RAID controller, which was filed against the kernel package. It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]. You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly. So the note in the bug report says presumably fixed. Did you find something in the kernel package to make you presume this? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303918: Patch to support IT8212 on-board RAID controller
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:28:19PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Dear Debian Kernel Maintainers, Alan Cox has a patch against 2.6.10 that supports the IT 8212 RAID Controller, which is found on some motherboards. just checked it's not in 2.6.12-rc2 nor in the ide-dev tree. i guess alan hasn't submitted it yet to bart. [ ... ] the patch will get into our tree as soon as it's accepted upstream. The main point of my request is that the patch be applied to Debian's kernel *before* it gets into the official sources. Indeed, once it is in the official sources, there's no need to patch Debian's kernel. I've been running a kernel with this driver for several weeks now with no ill effects -- in fact, my root partition is on a mirrored drive on this controller. Moreover, the patch simply adds one source file and fixes the Makefile to build it. It is quite safe for you to apply it. Regards, -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303918: Patch to support IT8212 on-board RAID controller
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-i386 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Dear Debian Kernel Maintainers, Alan Cox has a patch against 2.6.10 that supports the IT 8212 RAID Controller, which is found on some motherboards. This patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/28/79) applied with no problem against the Debian kernel sources. It just adds one extra source file that builds one extra module so there is no concern about code destabilization. I'm using this module on my system now. If you could include this in the debian sources and enable the module, I'd be very much in your debt. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10it8212 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
