Bug#402676: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000100

2006-12-11 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: normal

Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference 
at virtual address 0100
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  printing eip:
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: c0130adb
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: *pde = 
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Oops:  [#1]
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Modules linked in: af_packet nfs nfsd exportfs lockd 
nfs_acl sunrpc ipt_LOG xt_limit xt_state xt_multiport iptable_filter 
ipt_REDIRECT xt_tcpudp iptable_nat ip_tables x_tables ip_nat_ftp ip_nat 
ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack nfnetlink ext2 dm_mod floppy ne pcspkr ext3 jbd 
mbcache ide_cd cdrom ide_disk ide_generic generic ide_core 3c59x mii ne2k_pci 
8390 crc32 unix
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: CPU:0
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: EIP:0060:[c0130adb]Not tainted VLI
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010006   (2.6.18-7.pentium1.1 #1)
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: EIP is at find_get_page+0x1b/0x30
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: eax: c0fa04d8   ebx: c88f1cd0   ecx: 0100   edx: 

Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: esi:    edi: c0fa04d4   ebp:    esp: 
c2c27ec8
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: eax: c0fa04d8   ebx: c88f1cd0   ecx: 0100   edx: 

Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: esi:    edi: c0fa04d4   ebp:    esp: 
c2c27ec8
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Process find (pid: 9113, ti=c2c26000 task=c7fe6050 
task.ti=c2c26000)
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Stack: c0132ef2 c0fa04d4  c88f1cd0  
 c7c6f3e0 c88efcdd
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:c0fa04d4  c88f1cd0  1605 
  fd03
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:41ed 0004    
  
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c0132ef2] read_cache_page+0x32/0x160
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c88f1cd0] ext2_readpage+0x0/0x20 [ext2]
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c88efcdd] ext2_get_page+0x1d/0x290 [ext2]
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c88f1cd0] ext2_readpage+0x0/0x20 [ext2]
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c88f03e3] ext2_readdir+0xd3/0x2c0 [ext2]
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c015b9df] vfs_readdir+0x5f/0x80
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c015b800] filldir64+0x0/0xd0
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c015ba63] sys_getdents64+0x63/0xc0
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c015b800] filldir64+0x0/0xd0
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c01029f7] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Code: eb dd 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 
fa 8b 44 24 04 8b 4c 24 08 83 c0 04 51 50 e8 2d 9e 06 00 89 c1 58 85 c9 5a 74 
0c 8b 01 89 ca f6 c4 40 75 07 ff 42 04 fb 89 c8 c3 8b 51 0c eb f4
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel:  [c01029f7] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: Code: eb dd 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 
fa 8b 44 24 04 8b 4c 24 08 83 c0 04 51 50 e8 2d 9e 06 00 89 c1 58 85 c9 5a 74 
0c 8b 01 89 ca f6 c4 40 75 07 ff 42 04 fb 89 c8 c3 8b 51 0c eb f4
Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: EIP: [c0130adb] find_get_page+0x1b/0x30 SS:ESP 
0068:c2c27ec8




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#392126: `kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at': Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?

2006-10-10 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: normal

  Log has

kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at 

Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-9.pentium3.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#391619: p{re,ost}insts' comments contradict each other.

2006-10-07 Thread shaulka
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.80
Severity: minor

  Does  [ $1 = configure ]  [ -n $2 ] refers to an upgrade
or to a First time install?

  postinst cliams that:

 # Regenerate initramfs on upgrade
if [ $1 = configure ]  [ -n $2 ]; then

  while in preinst,

case $1 in
configure)
if [ -n $2 ]; then
mkdir -p /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d

# First time install.  Can we autodetect the RESUME partition?




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389486: typo in comment at initramfs-tools.preinst: inhertic - inherit

2006-09-25 Thread shaulka
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.80
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

--- initramfs-tools.preinst 2006-09-19 17:36:29.0 +0300
+++ initramfs-tools.preinst  2006-09-26 02:08:53.0 +0300
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
# First time install.  Can we autodetect the RESUME partition?
RESUME=$(tail -n $(($(wc -l /proc/swaps | awk ' { print $1 } ') - 1)) 
/proc/swaps | sort -rk3 | head -n 1 | awk ' { print $1 } ')

-   # Inhertic initrd-tools settings if possible.
+   # Inherit initrd-tools settings if possible.
if [ -e /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf ]; then
. /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf
fi




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hopefully straight forward patch by a newbie. Any comments?

2006-08-29 Thread shaulka
  I am clueless with kernel programming. Still, I have came up with the
following - hopefully straight forward - patch. Any comments?

--- ne.c2006-08-29 14:55:59.0 +0300
+++ linux-source-2.6.17/drivers/net/ne.c2006-08-29 16:02:24.0 
+0300
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@
 is at boot) and so the probe will get confused by any other 8390 cards.
 ISA device autoprobes on a running machine are not recommended anyway. */

-int init_module(void)
+static int __init init_ne_module(void)
 {
int this_dev, found = 0;

@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@
release_region(dev-base_addr, NE_IO_EXTENT);
 }

-void cleanup_module(void)
+static void __exit cleanup_ne_module(void)
 {
int this_dev;

@@ -880,4 +880,8 @@
}
}
 }
+
+module_init(init_ne_module);
+module_exit(cleanup_ne_module);
+
 #endif /* MODULE */

--- smc-ultra.c 2006-08-29 15:03:33.0 +0300
+++ linux-source-2.6.17/drivers/net/smc-ultra.c 2006-08-29 16:08:08.0 
+0300
@@ -553,8 +553,7 @@

 /* This is set up so that only a single autoprobe takes place per call.
 ISA device autoprobes on a running machine are not recommended. */
-int
-init_module(void)
+static int __init init_smcUltra_module(void)
 {
struct net_device *dev;
int this_dev, found = 0;
@@ -594,8 +593,7 @@
iounmap(ei_status.mem);
 }

-void
-cleanup_module(void)
+static void __exit cleanup_smcUltra_module(void)
 {
int this_dev;

@@ -608,4 +606,8 @@
}
}
 }
+
+module_init(init_smcUltra_module);
+module_exit(cleanup_smcUltra_module);
+
 #endif /* MODULE */







-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#384889: Don't know the implications of the following

2006-08-27 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-7
Severity: normal

  I am getting the following messages on stderr while make-kpkging. I don't  
know what the
implications are. 
  There is a DEPMOD=/sbin/depmod in the top Makefile: why, then, do I get
the message about depmod bellow? This was ran by a normal user: ddepmod is, 
indeed,
not on the PATH.

WARNING: drivers/net/ne.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from 
.text between 'init_module' (at offset 0xeb) and 'ne_close'
WARNING: drivers/net/smc-ultra.o - Section mismatch: reference to 
.init.data:ultra_portlist from .text between 'init_module' (at offset 0xa4) and 
'ultra_close_card'
WARNING: drivers/net/smc-ultra.o - Section mismatch: reference to 
.init.data:ultra_portlist from .text between 'init_module' (at offset 0xb4) and 
'ultra_close_card'
WARNING: drivers/net/smc-ultra.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: 
from .text between 'init_module' (at offset 0xc2) and 'ultra_close_card'
WARNING: drivers/net/smc-ultra.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: 
from .text between 'init_module' (at offset 0xea) and 'ultra_close_card'
/bin/sh: depmod: command not found
make: [install/linux-image-2.6.17-7] Error 127 (ignored)
tar: -: file name read contains nul character






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]